HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 355810
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 3558
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, DENYING THE APPEAL AND
UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S ACTION TO
APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND
DESIGN REVIEW 97-023, AUTHORIZING THE
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TWO-STORY DETACHED
GARAGE INTO A GUEST HOUSE AND TO CONSTRUCT A
TWO-STORY GARAGE ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 340 WEST
2ND STREET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I o
The Planning Commission finds and determines as
follows:
no
B o
C .
D .
E .
That a proper application, Conditional Use
Permit 97-014 and Design Review 97-023, was
filed by Cindy Dalrymple to authorize the
conversion of an existing two-story detached
garage into a guest house and to construct a
two-story garage addition to an existing
single-family residence located at 340 West
2nd Street.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed
and held on said application on September 22,
1997, and a continued public hearing was duly
called, noticed and held on October 6, 1997,
by the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning
Administrator adopted Zoning Administrator
Action 97-007, approving the request to
convert the existing garage and construct the
new garage'.
That on October 8, 1997, Mary Rivas, resident
at 350 West 2nd Street, submitted an appeal of
the Zoning Administrator's action on this
project.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed
and held for said appeal on November 10, 1997,
by the Planning Commission.
That the proposed use is allowed within the R-
I, Single-Family Residential District, with
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 2
F o
That the conversion of an existing two-story
detached garage into a guest house and the
construction of a two-story garage addition to
an existing single-family residence, as
conditioned, will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be
injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood of the
subject property, or to the general welfare of
the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the
following findings:
i o
The proposed addition complies with all
development standards, set forth for the
R-1 zoning district.
o
Ail proposed construction will be
consistent in style, color and appearance
with the existing construction.
.
Ail improvements within the detached
structure that were constructed without
City-issued building permits shall be
brought into compliance with City Codes.
o
The kitchen improvements within the
detached structure will be removed and
the exterior stairway will be enclosed,
thereby reducing the potential for use of
the structure as a rental second dwelling
unit.
.
A deed restriction will be executed and
recorded to prohibit the use of the
detached structure for leasing, rental,
or trade, and to prohibit the future
installation of kitchen improvements
within the structure. Said restriction
will run with the land and be binding on
all future owners or interested parties
of the property.
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin
Municipal Code, the Planning Commission finds
that the location, size, architectural
features and general appearance of the parking
lot expansion area will not impair the orderly
and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, or the
occupancy as a whole. In making such
findings, the Planning Commission has
considered at least the following items:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 3
1. Height, bulk and area of buildings.
2. Setbacks and site planning.
o
Landscaping, parking area design and
traffic circulation.
4. Location, height and standards of
exterior illumination.
5.. Location and method of refuse storage.
o
Physical relationship of proposed
improvements to existing structures in
the neighborhood.
·
Appearance ,and design relationship of
proposed improvements to existing
structures and possible future structures
in the neighborhood and public
thoroughfares.
.
Development Guidelines and criteria as
adopted by the City Council.
H.
This project is categorically exempt (Class 1)
pursuant to Section 15301 of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
I o
That the project has been reviewed for
consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element
of the City of Tustin General Plan and has
been determined to be consistent with the Air
Quality Sub-element.
II. The Planning Commission hereby denies the appeal
and upholds the Zoning Administrator's action to
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-014 and
Design Review 97-023 to authorize the conversion of
an existing two-story detached garage into a guest
house and the construction of a two-story garage
addition to an existing single-family residence at
340 West 2nd Street, subject to the conditions
contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City
meet on
of Tustin at a regular lng held t e 10th day of
November, 1997. ~
Chairman
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
!1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify
that I am the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the
City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3558 was
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 10th day of
November, 1997.
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3558
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND DESIGN REVIEW 97-023
NOVEMBER 10, 1997
GENERAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the
submitted plans for the project date stamped November 10,
1997 on file with the Community Development Department,
as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of
Community Development Department in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also
approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during
plan check if such modifications are to be consistent
with provisions of the Tustin City Code.
(1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in
this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance
of any building permits for the project, subject to
review and approval by the Community Development
Department.
(1) 1.3 Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval shall
become null and void unless all building permits are
issued and substantial construction is underway within
eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time
extensions may be granted by the Zoning Administrator if
a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to
expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 97-014 and Design
Review 97-023 is contingent upon the applicant and
property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director
of Community Development prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of
Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of the
City's approval of this project.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
(5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
(7) PC/CC POLICY
*** EXCEPTION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
(6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3558
Conditions of Approval
November 10, 1997
Page 2
PLANNING
(4) 2.1 The property owner shall execute and record a deed
restriction in a form acceptable to the Community
Development Department and City Attorney to ensure that
the guest room and room addition shall not be used for
leasing, rent, or trade, nor shall kitchen and/or cooking
facilities be installed. The deed restriction shall
provide that if the City is required to commence and
enforce an action to enforce the conditions contained
herein and the City prevails, the City shall be entitled
to an award of costs and fees incurred by the City
including attorney's fees and administration costs. The
deed restriction shall be recorded with the Office of the
County Recorder prior to the issuance of any permits and
shall be binding on all future owners or interested
parties of the property.
(4) 2.2 The kitchen improvements within the guest house are not
permitted pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9233
(B) (3) and shall be removed to the satisfaction of the
Building Official.
(4) 2.3 Ail improvements constructed without a building permit
shall be identified on construction level drawings as
required by Condition NO. 3.1 below, to the satisfaction
of the Building Official.
(1) 2.4 A Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the Community
Development Director is required prior to the issuance of
permits for the final design plans.
BUILDING
(1) 3.1 At plan check submit three (3) sets of construction
plans, including architectural, structural, electrical,
mechanical, plumbing, details and specifications, and two
(2) sets of structural calculations. Requirements of ~he
Uniform Building Code shall be complied with as approved
by the Building Official. No field changes shall be made
without corrections submitted to and approved by the
Community Development Department.
(3) 3.2 Ail new additions and existing areas added or converted
to a different use shall comply with the prevailing
building codes.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3558
Conditions of Approval
November 10, 1997
Page 3
FEES
(1) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall
(5) be made of all. applicable fees, including but not limited
to the following. Payment shall be required based upon
those rates in effect at the time of payment and are
subject to change.
A. Building plan check and permit fees to the
Community Development Department based on the most
current schedule.
B ,
C .
Orange County Fire Authority plan check and
inspection fees to the Community Development
Department based upon the most current schedule.
School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School
District subject to any agreement reached and
executed between the District and the applicant.
(1) 4.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject
(5) project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community
Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the
COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight
dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within
such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not
delivered to the Community Development Department the
above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any
interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act could be significantly
lengthened.