Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 346810 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 3468 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 96-037 TO ELIMINATE THREE (3) PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRODUCT TYPES FROM, AND ADD TWO (2) NEW PRODUCT TYPES TO, THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ON VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14410, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PIONEER ROAD AND PETERS CANYON ROAD.. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: ae That a proper application for Design Review 96-037 was submitted by Lewis Homes of California requesting approval to eliminate three (3) previously approved product types, hereafter referred to as Plan 398, Plan 399 and Plan 520, and to provide two (2) additional product types, hereafter referred to as Plan 388 and Plan 520, on Tract 14410, located at the northwesterly corner of Pioneer Road and Peters Canyon Road; and B · That the said application was considered by the Planning Commission on November 25, 1996; and C· That an Environmental Impact .Report EIR 85-2, as amended, for the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP) has been certified in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the subject project; and De Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 1. Height, bulk and area of buildings. 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior materials and colors. 4. Type and pitch of roofs. . Size and spacing of windows, doors and other openings. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 3468 Page 2 . Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television antennae. . Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation. . Locatioh, height and standards of exterior illumination. . Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure. 10. Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures in the neighborhood. 11. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structure to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 12. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Design Review 96- 037 authorizing the elimination of Plan 398, Plan 399 and Plan 520 and the addition of Plan 388 and Plan 520 on Tract 14410, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED A~D ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 25th day of November, 1996 y LOU BONE Chairman Recording Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY oF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify tha~ I am the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3468 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, he~d on the 25th day of November, 1996. Recording Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 3468 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DESIGN REVIEW 96-037 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans date st.amped November 25, 1996, on file with the Community Development Department as herein modified or as modified by the Director of. Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with provisions of the ETSP. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in the Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 Design Review approval shall become null and void unless building permits are issued within twenty four (24) months of the date of this Exhibit. (1) 1.4 The applicant shall sign and return an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form prior to issuance of building permits. (1) 1.5 The applicant and property owner shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of the City's approval of the entitlement process for this project. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7). PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW *** EXCEPTION Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 2 PLAN SUBMITTAL 2.1 At building plan checki the following items shall be submitted: (3) A. Construction plans, structural calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations. Requirements of the Uniform Building Codes, State Handicap and Energy Requirements shall be complied with as approved by the Building Official. (2) B. (3) Preliminary technical details and plans for all utility installations including cable TV, telephone, gas, water and electricity. Additionally, a note on plans shall be included stating that no field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Building Official. (2) C. (3) Rough and/or Precise grading plans and specifications consistent with the site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by' the Community Development Department. (1) D. (3) A precise soils engineering report provided by a soils engineer written in the previous twelve (12) months from the date of plan check submittal. (4) E. A model complex plan identifying all temporary fencing, landscaping, elevation alterations, parking facilities and other temporary model complex facilities subject to approval of Community Development Department. (2) F. (3) A detailed acoustical noise study prepared by a qualified acoustical expert, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department, to insure that interior noise levels do not exceed a maximum of 45 DbA CNEL and exterior noise levels shall not exceed a maximum of 65 DbA CNEL. (1) G. Detailed plans for pool and spa areas must be approved by the Orange County Health Department. All pool and spa areas must be enclosed by a five (5) foot high fence with self-closing and latching gates with access by key only and with vertical openings as established by the City's Uniform Swimming Pool.and Spa Code. Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 3 (3) H. Comply with Sec. 1710 of UBC for projections, e.g.; '. 1) combustible projections located where openings are not permitted or where protection of openings is required, shall be of i-HR fire- resistive or heavy timber construction conforming to Sec. 2106 of UBC, and; 2) projections shall not extend more than 12 inches into the area where openings are prohibited. (1) 2.2 Consideration shall be given to include rough plumbing for future solar heating options for recreation buildings. Copper shall be installed from hot water closet and the hot water closet shall be adequate to accommodate a solar water heater and the addition of a ll0V electrical outlet. (1) 2.3 Applicant shall be permitted to obtain grading permits and building permits for model unit construction prior to the recordation of applicable phases of Final Map 14410 provided all Building Code, Public Works, Fire Department and Community Development Department requirements have been met and approvals granted. (1) 2.4 Architectural plans shall not be submitted for plan check unless accompanied by a letter approving proposed design by The Irvine Company. SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS *** 3.1 The subject amended Design Review shall only apply to Lots 102, 104, 110, 115, 116, 119, 130, 137, 144, 151, 155, 158, 160, 163 and 168. Design Review 95-008 (Resolution Nos. 3392 and 3448) and the specific plotting of units on the remaining lots with Plans 250, 389, 398, 399, 393 and 520 shall remain in full force and effect. (1) 3.2 .Provide exact details for exterior doors and window types (4) and treatments (i.e., framing color, glass tint). (1) 3.3 Indicate location of exterior utility meters and include screening details. Screening adequacy, appearance and compatibility shall be subject to approval of the Community Development Department. Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 4 (1) 3.4 Ail exterior colors to be used shall be consistent with (4) the previously approved residences and shall be subject to review and approval of the Director of the Community Development Department. All exterior treatments shall be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on submitted construction plans and elevations. The color glacier white shall be eliminated from the exterior color palette. (1) 3.5 Note on final plans that a six-foot-high chain linked fence shall be installed around the site prior to building construction stages. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeter of the site for construction vehicles. (1) 3.6 Ail mechanical and electrical fixtures and equipment (4) shall be adequately and decoratively screened. The screen shall be considered as an element of the overall design of the project and shall blend with the architectural design of buildings. All telephone and electrical boxes shall be indicated on the building plans and shall be completely screened. Electrical transformers shall be located toward the interior of the project maintaining a sufficient distance to minimize visual impacts on entry points along Pioneer Road. If visible from the backbone road or auto court, air conditioning units shall be screened from view by architectural features. (1) 3.7 Exterior elevations of the buildings shall indicate any (4) fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the building, equipment heights and typ~ of screening. (4) (1) 3.8 Perimeter walls constructed by the subdivider shall be (3) consistent with wall concepts approved.for Tract 13627. Patio or courtyard block walls which do not also serve as perimeter walls for the project shall be consistent with main building treatments or community theme wall as reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department during plan check. (1) 3.9 Final'mailbox architectural details indicating color and (4) exterior treatment shall be included in the working drawings, and subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department during plan check. 3.10 Personal storage may occur within enclosed garages to the extent that vehicles can be parked within the garages at rates required by the East Tustin Specifid Plan. Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 5 LANDSCAPING, GROUNDS AND HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS (6) 4.1 The applicant shall submit detailed landscaping and irrigation plans for all new landscaping areas and the model'complex on the site consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Guidelines. The plans shall include the following information: a. A summary table applying indexing identification to plant materials in their actual location. The plan and table must list botanical and common names, sizes, spacing, actual location and quantity of the plant materials proposed. · Planting and berming details, soil preparation, staking, etc. C · The irrigation plan shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be provided. Do Ail property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-way area, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. E · Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping irrigation materials is subject to field inspection at project completion by the. Community Development Department. (6) 4.2 The Community Development Department may request minor substitutions of plant materials or request additional sizing or quantity materials during plan check. (7) 4.3 The submitted landscaping plans at plan check shall reflect the following requirements: A· Turf is Unacceptable for grades over 25%. A combination, of planting materials must be used, ground cover on large areas along is not acceptable. B · Shrubs shall be spaced a minimum of 5 feet on center. C. Ground cover shall be planted between 8 to 12 inches on center· Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 6 D. Fences, walls and equipment areas, shall be screened with shrubs and/or vines and trees. E o Ail plant materials shall be installed in a healthy vigorous condition typical to the species and must be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. Maintenance includes but is not limited to trimming, mowing, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of diseased or dead plants. F o Buffer driveway and parking areas with landscaping berms when possible. G. Earth mounding is essential and must be provided to applicable heights whenever it is possible in conjunction with the submitted landscaping plan. Earth mounding should be particularly provided at project entries and along the backbone road. Major points of entry to the project, courtyards and pedestrian internal circulation routes shall receive specimen trees to create an identification theme. I · Landscape adjacent to' the right'-of-way shall be coordinated with parkway landscaping. Perimeter walls shall be treated with vines, in order to relieve large expanses of walls. Vines shall be informally grouped with training devices installed. (1) 4.4 Screening adjacent to roadways, whenever possible, shall (7) compliment the architecture, color and construction (4) material of primary buildings on the site. (1) 4.5 Ail Walls, fences or landscaping adjacent' to streets (7) should be designed to provide adequate sight distance for (4) vehicles exiting the tract via the private streets. (1) 4.6 Provide details, 'colors, and materials for all exterior (4) walkways, stairs and walls. Design interior walkways to (7) create a reinforced pedestrian corridor with accessory landscaping treatment. (1) 4.7 Entryways to the project, site should be focal points. (4) In addition to larger tree treatments, these areas should (7) be provided with a variety of color and treatment of landscaping as well as an incorporation of special decorative signage or pavement treatment (i.e., walls, gates, lighting, etc.). Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 7 · (1) 4.8 A complete, detailed project sign program including (4) design, location, sizes, colors, and materials shall be approved by The Irvine Company then submitted for review and approval by the Department of Community Development. The sign program shall include temporary and permanent project identification, addressing and street signs. Address signs shall be automatically illuminated. (1) 4.9 Indicate lighting scheme for project, note locations of (4) all exterior lights and types of fixtures on the 'elevations. All street lighting shall be in accordance with City standards. Lights to be installed on buildings shall be a decorative design No lights shall be permitted which may create any ~1 have a are or negative impact on adjoining properties. The location and types of lighting shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. (6) 4~10 Ail landscape structures, such as trellises, gazebos, decks, barbecue areas, pools, etc., within the recreation complex shall require building permits. (4) 4.11 The. motor court shall include the use of decorative hardscape pavement treatments and subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department during plan check. (4) 4.12 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 1, the developer shall install all landscaping on .perimeter Lots "M", "N" and "O" and a chain-link screen fencing, maximum 6 feet in height, shall be installed on Lots "K", "L" and "V". Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase 3, the developer shall install all landscaping on perimeter Lots "K", "L" and "V". Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for Phase A, the developer shall install all landscaping on perimeter Lots "R" and "S". The phasing plan shall be revised to include these improvements. (4) 4.13 Prior to the issuance of any certificates: of Occupancy for dwellings within Phase 2, all site improvements and landscaping shall be installed on recreation lots A', W and AJ. The phasing plan shall be revised to include these improvements. (4) 4.14 The visibility sight lines need to be shown on the landscape plan per OCE ~M~ Standard Plan No. 1117 at the intersection of Pioneer Road/Carlson court and Peters Canyon Road/Orchard Drive. Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 8 NOISE (1) 5.1 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, a final (2) acoustical analysis report describing the acoustical (3) design features of the structures required to satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards shall be submitted to the Tustin Community Development Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the appr6ved acoustical report(s) have been incorporated into the design of'the project. The acoustical analysis shall be prepared by an expert or authority in the field of acoustics. Ail residential lots and dwellings shall be sound attenuated against present and projected noises, which shall be the sum of all noise impacting the project, so as not to exceed an exterior' standard 65 dBA CNEL in outdoor areas and an interior standard of 45 dBA CNEL in all habitable rooms is required. Evidence prepared under the supervision of an acoustical consultant that these standards will be satisfied in a manner consistent with applicable zoning regulations shall be provided. (1) 5.2 Prior to issuance of any Certificates of Use or (3) Occupancy, field testing in accordance with the Title 25 regulations may be required by the Building Official to verify compliance with STC and IIC design standards. (1) 5.3 Ail construction operations, including engine warm-up, deliveries of materials and equipment, shall be subject to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance shall take place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until $:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on. Saturday unless otherwise determined by the Building Official.. (1) 5.4 Construction hours shall be clearly posted on the project site to the satisfaction of the Building Official. FEES (1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall (3) be made of all required fees as may be in effect at the (6) time of permit issuance, including but not limited to: a. Major thoroughfare and bridge fees in the amount of $2,501 per unit to the Tustin Public Works Department, or as may be amended prior to permit issuance. Exhibit A Design Review 96-037 Resolution No. 3468 Page 9 S . C. m. E · F· G. Water and sewer connection fees to the Irvine Ranch Water District. Street improvement, grading and landscaping plan check~ and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule, as may be amended prior to permit issuance. Ail applicable Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule, as may be amended prior to permit issuance. New development fees in the amount of $350 per unit to the Community Development Department, or as may be amended prior to permit issuance. 'School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the Irvine Company. Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a ~ashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight dollars) pursuant to AB 3185, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, to enable the. City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code SeCtion 21151 and 14 California Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above- noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. In addition, should the Department of Fish and Game reject the Certificate of Fee Exemption filed with the Notice of Determination and require payment of fees, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, within forty-eight (48) hours of notification, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $850 (eight hundred fifty dollars) pursuant to AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. If this fee is imposed, the subject project shall not be operative, vested or final unless and until the fee is paid.