The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC RES 33676 7 $ 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 27 RESOLUTION NO. 3367 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 95-003 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN GATES AT MARICOPA AND PARKCENTER LANE ON TRACT 13080 The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I · The Planning Commissio~ finds and determines as follows: A· That a proper application, Design Review 95-003, was filed by the Maricopa Homeowner's Association requesting approval to install vehicular and pedestrian, gates at an existing residential project on Tract 13080. B· That the said application was considered by the Planning Commission on July 10, 1995. C· Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 1. Site planning. 2. Exterior materials and colors. 3. Landscaping and traffic circulation. · Development Guidelines and Criteria as adopted by the City Council. De That this project has been determined to be Categorically Exempt (Class 3) pursuant to Section 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act. II. The Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Design Review 95-003 authorizing the installation of vehicular and pedestrian gates at the Maricopa residential project on Tract 13080, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 I 27 28 Resolution No. 3367 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 10th day of July, 1995. Recording Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) Chairperson I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3367 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 10th day of July, 1995. Recording Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 3367 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DESIGN REVIEW 95-003 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans date stamped July 10, 1995 on file with the Community Development Department as herein modified or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with provisions of the East Tustin Specific Plan. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in the Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 Design review approval shall become null and void unless all building permits are issued within eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. (1) 1.4 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of building permits. (1) 1.5 The applicant and property owner shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin for all claims and liabilities arising out of the City's approval of the entitlement process for this project. (5) 1.6 The pedestrian gates shall not have any locking devices that would restrict pedestrians from exiting the tract. PLAN SUBMITTAL (4) 2.1 The landscaping proposed for the new medians shall be consistent with the existing landscape theme located within the Maricopa/Parkcenter right-of~'way and similar to the existing landscaping contained within the existing median. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UI~IFOR/{. BUILDING CODE/$ (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW ** * EXCEPTION Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3367 Page 2 (4) 2.2 Ail finish materials and colors shall be noted on the working drawings and shall be consistent with existing improvements, subject to final approval by the Community Development Department. (5) 2.3 At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the 1991 Uniform Building Code, other related Codes, City Ordinances, and State and Federal laws and regulations. (1) 2.4 Specifications at Building Permit plan check submittal shall reflect material call-outs on all elevations with applicable details and notes added. (1) 2.5 At plan check, submit three (3) sets of construction plans, two (2) sets of structural calculations and Title 24 energy calculations prepared be a licensed engineer/architect. No field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. (5) 2.6 At plan check, submit a complete landscaping plan as described in Condition of Approval No.2.1. FIRE (5) 3.1 All trees at the entrance shall be maintained to provide a minimum vertical clearance of thirteen feet, si>: inches (13'-6"). (5) 3.2 The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Orange Count}, Fire DeDa~' . _=ment regarding vehicular gate access requirements. POLICE 4.1 The KNOX box shall be located on the outside/public portion of the vehicle gates at all times. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3367 Page 3 PUBLIC WORKS (1) 5.~ The applicant shall replace any damaged public improvements along Maricopa or Parkcenter Lane occurring as a result of Design Review 95-003, which may include, but not limited to the following: a · Curb and gutter; Sidewalk; Street paving~ FEES (1) 6.1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees including but not limited to building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. (1) 6.2 Within 48 hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashiers check payable to the COUNTY CLERK,in the amount of $25.00 (twenty five) pursuant to AB 3185, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21151 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If within such forsy-eigkt (45) hour period that the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the approval for the project granted herein shall be considered automatically null and void. In addition, should the Department of Fish and Game reject the Certificate of Fee Exemption filed with the Notice of Determination and require pa~ent of fees, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, within forty-eight (48) hours of notification, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $850 (eight hundred fifty dollars) pursuant to AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. If this fee is imposed, the subject project shall not be operative, vested or .final unless and until the fee is paid.