Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 326210 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 3262 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 93-043 FOR A 223 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM DWELLING DEVELOPMENT ON TRACT 14883. The Planning Commission of the City of. Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A® That a proper application, Design Review 93-043 was filed by John Laing Homes requesting approval of a 223 residential condominium dwelling development to be constructed on a 14.616 acre site identified as Lot 12 of Tract 12870. Be That the said application was considered by the Planning Commission on May 23, 1994. Ce Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission finds that t~e location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 1. Height, bulk and area of buildings. 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior materials and colors. 4. Type and pitch of roofs. Se Size and spacing of windows, doors and other openings. · Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television antennae. · Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation. · Location, height and standards of exterior illumination. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 3262 Page 2 · Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure. 10. Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures in the neighborhood. 11. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structure to existing structures and possible feature structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 12. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. II. The Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Design Review 93-043 authorizing construction of a 223 residential condominium dwelling development subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 23rd day of May, 1994. Recording Secretary Chairperson 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 3262 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3262 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 23rd day of May, 1994. Recording Secretary EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 3262 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DESIGN REVIEW 93-043 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans date stamped May 23, 1994 on file with the Community Development Department as herein modified or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with provisions of the East Tustin Specific Plan. (1) 1.Z Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in the Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 Design review approval shall become null and void unless all building permits are issued within eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. (1) 1.4 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of building permits. (1) 1.5 The applicant and property owner shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin for all claims and liabilities arising out of the City's approval of the entitlement process for this project. (1) 1.6 Approval of Design Review 93-043 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14883 is contingent upon approval by the City Council of Zone Change 93-005 amending the East Tustin Specific Plan. Should Zone Change 93-005 not be approved, the project shall be modified to comply with the applicable requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan, subject to the review of the Director of Community Development. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW *** EXCEPTION Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 2 PLAN SUBMITTAL 2.1 At building plan check the following shall be submitted: (3) A. Construction plans, structural calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations. Requirements of the Uniform Building Codes, State Handicap and Energy Requirements shall be complied with as approved by the Building Official. (2) (3) Be (2) C. (3) (2) D. (3) (2) (3) Et (2) F. (3) (2) G. Preliminary technical detail and plans for all utility installations including cable TV, telephone, gas water and electricity. Additionally, a note on plans shall be included stating that no field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Building Official. Final grading and specification consistent with the site plan and landscaping plans and prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the Community Development Department. Subject grading submittal shall comply with all requirements of Condition 4.1 and 4.2 contained in Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3263. Information, plans and/or specifications to ensure satisfaction of Condition 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 and 1.10 of Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3263. Final soils report prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the Building Division. Information, plans and/or specifications to ensure compliance with Conditions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3263. A detailed acoustical noise study prepared by a qualified acoustical expert shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department to insure that interior noise levels do not exceed a maximum of 45 dBa's and that the Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 3 exterior noise levels shall not exceed a maximum of 65 dBa's. The report and any subsequent field inspection shall comply with Condition 6.1 and 6.2 of Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3263. (1) Z.2 Submitted construction drawings shall be in conformance with all development standards as applicable in the East Tustin Specific Plan. Conceptual approval of locations of structures shall not constitute final approval. Any administrative adjustments are subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. (5) 2.3 No temporary construction fencing shall be permitted to encroach into the required travelways of the private streets or private courts. (1) 2.4 Submitted construction drawings shall reflect all dimensions consistently between vesting tentative tract map, site plan, landscape plan, model plan and architectural plans. SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS (1) 3.1 Provide exact details of all exterior door and window (4) types, including but not limited to such information as frame color and glass tint. (1) 3.2 All exterior colors to be used shall be subject to review (4) and approval of the Director of the Community Development Department. All exterior treatments shall be coordinated with regard to color, materials and detailing and noted on submitted construction plans and elevations shall indicate'all colors and materials to be used. (1) 3.3 Note on final plans that a six-foot high chain linked fence shall be installed around the site prior to building construction stages. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeter of the site for construction vehicles. (1) 3.4 Ail mechanical and electrical fixtures and equipment (4) shall be adequately and decoratively screened. The screen shall be considered as an element of the overall Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 4 design of the project and shall blend with the architectural design of buildings. Ail telephone and electrical boxes shall be indicated on the building plans and shall be completely screened. Electrical transformers shall be located toward the interior of the project maintaining sufficient distance to minimize visual impacts from Greenway Drive. (1) 3.5 Exterior elevations of the buildings shall indicate any (4) fixtures or equipment to be located on the roof of the building, equipment heights and type of screening. (1) 3.6 On-site subdivision walls shall be constructed by subdivider including property line or common area dividing fencing (between units) within interior of project. Provide drawings indicating wall materials, cap and other decorative treatments and color. Walls must be consistent with wall concepts approved for Tract 12870. Interior property line dividing walls which do not also serve as perimeter Walls for project shall be consistent with main building treatments. Retaining walls shall have exterior treatments consistent with other subdivision walls. Provide wall/fence legend on site plan including retaining walls. (1) 3.7 Provide legible grade numbers with a minimum of .40% grade information on the tract map and grading plan. (1) 3.8 Show three inch (3") stripping details of parking spaces. (1) 3.9. Automatic garage doors are required. (1) 3.10 Each dwelling shall have separate gas and electrical meters. (1) 3.1~ The site plan shall be revised to provide six-inch continuous curbs and minimum 2.5 foot landscape planters in front of the following head-in parking spaces: spaces 6-9, 19-23, and 112-114. (5) 3.~Z The setback from the private drive at the garage court entrance shall be modified to indicate a minimum 3-foot setback from the private drive to the garage. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 5 LANDSCAPIN~ ~ROUNDS AND HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS (1) 4.1 Submit at plan check complete detailed landscaping and irrigation plans for all landscaping areas, including the model complex, consistent with adopted City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Submittal Requirements. Provide summary table identifying plant materials. The plant table shall list botanical and common names, sizes, spacing, location and quantity of the plant materials proposed. Show planting and beaming details, soil preparation, staking, etc. The irrigation plan shall show location and control of backflow prevention devices, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing and coverage. Details for all equipment must be provided. Show all property lines on the landscaping and irrigation plan, public right-of-way areas, sidewalk widths, parkway areas, and wall locations. The Community Development Department may request minor substitutions of plant materials or request additional sizing or quantity materials during plan check. Note on landscaping plan that coverage of landscaping and irrigation materials is subject to field inspection at project completion by the Department of Community Development. (7) 4.2 The submitted landscaping plans at plan check shall reflect the following requirements: A® Turf is unacceptable for grades over 25%. A combination of planting materials must be used, ground cover on large areas alone is not acceptable. Be Shrubs shall be a minimum of 5 gallon size and shall be spaced a minimum of 5 feet on center. Ce Ground cover shall be planted between 8 to 12 inches on center. De Fences, walls and equipment areas, shall be screened with shrubs and/or vines and trees. Ee Ail plant materials shall be installed in a healthy vigorous condition typical to the species and must be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 6 Maintenance includes but is not limited to trimming, moving, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering and replacement of diseased or dead plants. Fo Buffer driveway and parking areas with landscaping berms when possible. Ge A thickly planted landscape shall be installed along the edge of the project. Use natural landscaping and other architectural detailing to soften their visual appearance. He Major points of entry to the project, courtyards and pedestrian internal circulation routes shall receive specimen trees to create an identification theme. I · Landscape adjacent to the right-of-way shall be coordinated with parkway landscaping. Perimeter walls should be treated with vines in order to relieve large expanse of walls with greenery and color. Vine should be informally grouped with raining devices installed. (1) 4.3 The landscape treatment along Greenway Drive shall be (7) consistent with the approved landscape concept for Sector (4) 7. This treatment includes the use of Desert and Spotted Gum Eucalyptus trees, Pittosporum Tobira and Jasminum Humile shrubs, Lonicera, Vinca and Turf ground covers and Bougainvillea vines. (1) 4.4 Screening adjacent to roadways, whenever possible, shall (7) compliment the architecture, color and construction (4) materials of primary buildings on the site. (1) 4.5 Ail walls, fences or landscaping adjacent to streets (7) should be designed to provide adequate sight distance for (4) vehicles exiting the tract via the private streets. (1) 4.6 Provide details, colors and materials for all exterior (4) walkways, stairs and walls. Design interior walkways to create a pedestrian corridor with accessory landscaping treatment. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 7 (1) 4.7 Entryway to the project site should be focal points. In (4) addition to larger tree treatments these areas should be provided with a variety of color and treatment of landscaping as well as an incorporation of special decorative signage or pavement treatment (i.e., walls, gates, lighting, etc.) (1) 4.8 A complete, detailed project sign program including design, location, sizes, colors and materials shall be approved by the Irvine Company then submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. The sign program shall include temporary project identification, addressing and street signs. Address signs shall be automatically illuminated. (1) 4.9 Indicate lighting scheme for project, note locations of all exterior lights and types of fixtures. Lights to be installed on buildings shall be a decorative design. No lights shall be permitted which may create any glare of have a negative impact on adjoining properties. The location and types of lighting shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. (4) 4.10 Mailboxes shall include methods to ensure security provisions with locking devices where an acceptable manufactured product is available, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. Said mailboxes shall also meet the requirements of the postmaster. (5) 4.1~ A weed barrier shall be placed below the dwarf kumquat grove wherever gravel is utilized as a planting base around kumquat trees, subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. At any future, point in time as determined by the developer or future Homeowner's Association, the alternate landscaping plan provided as Attachment D in the Planning Commission staff report dated May 23, 1994, may be implemented without the need for any additional design review subject to issuance of any permits required by the Uniform Building Code. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Design Review 93-043 Resolution No. 3262 Page 8 FEES (1) 5.1 Payment of all fees is required in accordance with Condition 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3 of Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3263.