HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 2927-D1
~~
V
4
J
G
R
c~
1O
11',
12~
13I
14
1~1~
~;
~.
~~
1G~~
~~
li~j
it
1$il
i
i9
2(1
2l~
)=) ,
i;
23 ~ j
24
,,
~~
2~
2G
27
2sil
RESOLUTION NO. 2927-D
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
DENIAL TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF DESIGN
REVIEW 91-07 FOR MINOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS
INCLUDING CERTAIN LOT CONSOLIDATION BONUSES
AND A CONSOLIDATED PARKING/ACCESS BONUS
PURSUANT TO THE FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN FOR
THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 135 SOUTH PROSPECT
AVENUE AND 240 EAST FIRST STREET
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as
follows:
A. That a proper application, Design Review No.
91-07 was filed on behalf of Stephen Paquette
requesting approval of minor site
improvements, certain Lot Consolidation
Bonuses and Consolidated Parking/Access Bonus
in accordance with the First Street Specific
Plan.
B. That the application was discussed on July 22,
1991 and a resolution recommending denial was
brought back as requested by the Commission on
August 12, 1991.
C. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin
Municipal Code, findings must be made that the
location, size, architectural features and
general appearance of the proposed development
will not impair the orderly and harmonious
development of the area, the present or future
development therein. In making such findings,
the Commissior, has considered at least the
follo~~ing items
1. Height, bulk and area of buildings.
2. Setbacks and site planning.
3. Exterior materials and colors.
4 . Type and pitch of roofs .
5. Size and spacing of windows, doors and
other openings.
lI
~~
4
J
G
8
~I
1O
11
I
12~~
13i
14
15I
,;
1G;;
,,
1i~1
;,
I
l~j
i.
i~i~
,,
2()~
21
22
,~
23
~~
24 '
~.
2~ ~ ~
2G
27
,~
28
Resolution No. 2927-D
Page 2
6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures,
flagpoles, radio and television antennae.
7. Landscaping, parking area design and
traffic circulation.
8. Location, height and standards of
exterior illumination.
9. Location and appearance of equipment
located outside of an enclosed structure.
10. Location and method of refuse storage.
11. Physical relationship of proposed
structures to existing structures in the
neighborhood.
12. Appearance and design relationship of
proposed structures to existing
structures and possible future structures
in the neighborhood and public
thoroughfares .
13. Proposed signing.
14. Development Guidelines and criteria as
adopted by the City Council.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends denial to
the Redevelopment Agency of Design Review 91-07 for
minor site improvements, including certain lot
consolidation bonuses and a consolidated
parking/access bonus pursuant to the First Street
Specific Plan for the properties located at 135
South Prospect Avenue and 240 East First Street as
the following findings cannot be made pursuant to
City Code Section 9272:
A. Setbacks and Site Planning - The project
overall proposes awkward site planning and
requires deviations in landscaping, parking
area design and circulation that are not
justified by the visual improvements proposed
and, therefore, does not meet the Development
Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the
First Street Specific Plan.
1
?I
~3
4
J
G
i
8
c~
1 Cl
11
12
13
14i,
1:~!I
1G
~~
~:
lil'
i
l~l~
I'
1~~'
20 ~ I
~, ~ ~ .
~~)
4nr
~i
.,
23
24
i.
~,
2J
2G
2i
28
Resolution No. 2927-D
Page 3
B. Landscat~ina, Parking Area Desian and Traffic
Circulation - The project requires approval of
development bonuses and the implementation of
these would only compound problems associated
with deficiencies in the amount of parking
provided (28 spaces overall) compared with
that required (30 spaces overall).
C. Physical Relationship of Proposed Structures
to Existing Structures in the Neighborhood -
The existing structures at the property
located at 135 South Prospect Avenue are
located in such close proximity that the site
is constricted and parking and on-site
circulation problems would result.
D. Development Guidelines and Criteria as Adopted
by the City Council - The project would not
result in furthering many of the goals and
objectives of the First Street Specific Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City
of Tustin at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of
July, 1991.
~,
DONALD LE UN ~
Chairman
~i ,,~
~_ ; ~~~
KATHLEEN CLANCY
Recording Secretar~•
1
3
4
J
G
g
c)
1f)
11
12 ~
13
14
15
i~
1G
li j
1$
1~ ~
2U
~~
21 ~~
i~
22
23
24
25
2G
27
28
Resolution No. 2927-D
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, KATHLEEN CLANCY the
I am the Recording Secs
of the City of Tustin,
2927-D was duly passed
of the Tustin Planning
of July, 1991.
undersigned, hereby certify that
~etary of the Planning Commission
California; that Resolution No.
and adopted at a regular meeting
Commission, held on the 22nd day
THLEEN CLANCY
Recording Secretar
AEB:nm