HomeMy WebLinkAbout03 AMEND. NPDES AG 07-01-02AGENDA REPORT
NO. 03
07-01-02
MEETING DATE: JULY 1, 2002 400-70
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF NPDES
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT NO. D02-048
SUMMARY
The Santa Ana Region National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater
Permit requires all permittees to revise the existing Implementation Agreement by July 1, 2002.
The existing Implementation Agreement, approved December 18, 1990, is a multi-agency
agreement that identifies the roles of participating cities, the County of Orange, and the Orange
County Flood Control District. It also provides a cost sharing formula for funding the
implementation of the NDPES permit. The revision is necessary to include three (3) additional
cities and incorporate the revised cost sharing formula.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Amendment and Restatement of NPDES
Implementation Agreement No. D02-048 with the participating Orange County cities, the County of
Orange, and the Orange County Flood Control District, and authorize execution of the agreement
by the Mayor and City Clerk on behalf of the City.
FISCAL IMPACT
The agreement requires the City to pay the amount of $132,041 for its portion of the Fiscal Year
2002/2003 costs associated with the NPDES program administered by the County of Orange.
These costs include County staff and supplemental consultant staff time spent on managing and
developing work products for each of the major category requirements of the permit. This fee is
determined for each participating city based upon its area and population. The proposed Fiscal
Year 2002/2003 NPDES Operating Budget (01-402-6222) includes funding for this fee.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The NPDES Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement delegates the responsibilities between
the County and cities for compliance with the Santa Ana Region NPDES Stormwater Permit.
Currently, thirty-three (33) cities, the County of Orange, and the Orange County Flood Control
District share the responsibilities mandated by the NPDES stormwater permit. However,
Implementation Agreement No. D02-048 will allow the addition of the cities of Aliso Viejo, Laguna
Woods, and Rancho Santa Margarita in addition to incorporating the revised shared cost formula
based on the new total of thirty-six (36) permittee cities and two county agencies. The revised
cost sharing formula is based upon the weighted average of the population and land area in each
respective city, with the Orange County FloodControl District funding 10% of the total cost. The
participating costs for each city are also adjusted for regional costs specific to the Santa Ana and
San Diego Region NPDES Permits.
Amendment and Restatement of NPDES Implementation Agreement No. D02-048
July 1, 2002
Page 2
The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Tim D. Serlet
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
TDS:DRK:ccg:Amendment & Restatement of NPDES Imp Agmt.doc
Engineering Services Manager
Attachment: Amendment and Restatement of NPDES Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement No. D02-048
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEHENT
This AGREEMENT, for purposes of identification numbered D02-048, entered into
this day of
, 2002, by the County of Orange, (herein called
the COUNTY), the Orange County Flood Control District (herein called DISTRICT) and the
cities of Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Brea, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Dana Point,
Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Laguna Beach,
Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, La Habra, La Palma, Los
Alamitos, Mission viejo, Newport Beach, Orange, Placentia, Rancho Santa Margarita, San
Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton, Tustin, Villa Park,
Westminster, and Yorba Linda (herein called CITIES) restates the agreement provisions
made previously by the COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES with respect to compliance with the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) municipal stormwater permits
issued for Orange County and amends specified provisions to add three additional
cities, revises participant share calculations and allows participant share
calculations on a countywide and regional basis. The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES may
be referred to collectively as PERMITTEES or individually as a PERMITTEE in this
AGREEMENT.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 through the Water Quality Act (herein called WQA)
amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p)) to require
the federal Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate regulations for applications
for permits for stormwater discharges; and
I 5-31-02 Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048I
WHEREAS, these permit regulations will require the control of pollutants from
stormwater discharges by requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit which would allow the lawful discharge of stormwaters into waters of the United
States; and
WHEREAS, these EPA regulations require NPDES permits for discharges from
municipal storm sewers on a system-wide or jurisdiction-wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature, in enacting the Orange County Flood Control Act,
created the Orange County Flood Control District to provide for the control of flood
and storm waters; and
WHEREAS, the powers granted to the DISTRICT include carrying on technical and
other investigations, examinations, or tests of all kinds, making measurements,
collecting data, and making analyses, studies, and inspections pertaining to water
supply, control of floods, use of water, water quality, nuisance, pollution, waste,
and contamination of water, both within and without the DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, the DISTRICT and the CITIES desire to develop an integrated
stormwater discharge management program with the objective of improving water quality
in the County of Orange; and
WHEREAS, the California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) as designee
of the EPA has delegated authority to the Regional Water Quality Control Boards-Santa
Aha Region (RWQCB-SAR) and San Diego Region (RWQCB-SDR)(collectively, the RWQCBs) for
administration of the NPDES stormwater permit application process within the
boundaries of their Regions; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES have been designated as PERMITTEES by
the RWQCBs; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has been designated as the Principal PERMITTEE on the
permits; and
2 ~31~2Fi~1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
WHEREAS, cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT to jointly
file applications for NPDES Stormwater permits and implement common programs, to the
extent feasible, is in the best interests of the CITIES, the COUNTY and the District;
and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY is willing to share the expertise of its staff with the
CITIES so that they can join in seeking and implementing certain requirements of the
NPDES Stormwater permits; and
WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES approved a Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement to
memorialize program cooperation based on the above recitals on December 18, 1990 which
was subsequently amended on October 26, 1993 by Amendment No. 1 (the December 18, 1990
Agreement as Amended by Amendment No. 1 will be referred to collectively hereinafter
as the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT); and
WHEREAS, Section X of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT provided that the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT may be amended by consent of a majority of the PERMITTEES which represent a
majority of the percentage contributions as described in Section IV of the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, Section VI of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT states that any city which becomes
signatory to this ORIGINAL AGREEMENT after the applications for the initial NPDES
stormwater permits have been approved shall comply with all of the provisions of the
ORIGINAL AGREEMENT; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections VI and X of the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT, the PERMITTEES
approved Amendment No. 1 to the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT (herein called AMENDMENT NO. 1) on
October 26, 1993 to add two newly incorporated cities, provide participant share
calculations based on thirty-three PERMITTEES and establish a Technical Advisory
Committee; and
WHEREAS, the PERMITTEES now desire to restate those provisions in the ORIGINAL
AGREEMENT that remain unchanged and amend specified provisions to add three additional
3 5-31-02 Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
cities, revise participant share calculations and allow participant share calculations
on a countywide and regional basis.
NOW THEREFORE: The PERMITTEES hereto do mutually agree to add the cities of
Aliso Viejo, Laguna Woods and Rancho Santa Margarita as PERMITTEES under this
AGREEMENT, to restate those provisions in the ORIGINAL AGREEMENT that remain unchanged
and amend Sections II, III.A., III.B., III.C., IV, VIII, IX, XI and XV in their
entirety as follows:
I. FILING STATUS
The COUNTY, DISTRICT and CITIES will file the applications for stormwater
permits as PERMITTEES. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT and each individual City
will be a PERMITTEE.
II. INCORPORATION OF FEDERAL GUIDELINES
The terms of all applicable Federal and State water quality regulations
and guidelines under the Clean Water Act and Water Quality Act, as
presently written or as changed during the life of this agreement are
hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT and
take precedence over any inconsistent terms of this AGREEEMEATT.
III. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
The responsibilities of each of the parties shall be as follows:
a.
The COUATTY, on a cost-shared basis, shall administer system
compliance by:
1 ·
Preparing implementation and annual operating budgets. The
budget year shall coincide with the fiscal year of the COUNTY,
July 1 - June 30.
a. The participants shall be permitted to review and
approve the annual operating budget and work plan for
the forthcoming year. Criteria for approval shall be
4 ~31~2Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2 .
3 .
4 .
5 .
6 .
Agreement D02-048
affirmative responses from a majority of the PERMITTEES
which represent a majority of the percentage
contribution as described in Section IV. The COUNTY and
the DISTRICT will represent one voting PERMITTEE with
their percentage contribution equal to the total of the
COUNTY and the DISTRICT as described in Section IV. The
review period shall be from January 1 to January 31 of
each year with approval of the final budget to be
completed by February 15.
b. The annual operating budget shall not be exceeded
without prior consent of the majority of the PERMITTEES
which represent a majority of the percentage
contribution.
Consulting with the city managers and any committees
established by the city managers when preparing budgets and
major program elements.
Preparing compliance reports to the Regional Board and
providing copies to the PERMITTEES.
Preparing a model system-wide Best Management Practices (BMP)
Program report.
Monitoring the implementation and ensuring the effectiveness
of system-wide BMPs. This will include field reconnaissance to
evaluate structural and procedural BMPs. An annual report to
the RWQCBs will be prepared presenting the results of these
evaluations.
The COUNTY as Principal PERMITTEE may retain the services of
professional consultants and may fund, or contribute to
5 ~31~2Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
B ·
C.
Agreement D02-0481
funding technical and/or economic studies conducted by
professional organizations such as the American Public Works
Association
The DISTRICT shall, to the maximum extent practicable, and on a
cost-shared basis except as set forth in subparagraph 4 below:
1. Perform the water quality and hydrographic monitoring for
permit compliance.
2. Administer the water pollution control program by enforcing
the Orange County Water Quality Ordinance.
3. Develop uniform criteria for annual inspection of drainage
facilities.
4. Perform inspections, at no cost to the CITIES or the COUNTY,
on those facilities owned by the DISTRICT and on municipal
separate storm sewers in unincorporated County. Contracts for
such inspections within CITIES may be undertaken at the sole
expense of the requesting city.
The CITIES shall, to the maximum extent practicable, and at no cost
to COUNTY or DISTRICT:
1. Implement a facility inspection program in accordance with the
uniform criteria developed by the DISTRICT, for all municipal
separate storm sewers as defined by the stormwater permit and
within the jurisdictional boundaries of that city.
2. Submit to the COUNTY stormwater drain maps with periodic
revisions which reflect the modifications that were made to
the storm drain system.
3. Prepare watershed characterizations, including:
a.
Zoning designations, and
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
D.
E.
Agreement D02-048
b. Identification of areas where hazardous materials
presently are or are suspected to have been stored,
manufactured, or disposed. This shall include sites at
which a hazardous material spill has occurred.
4. Review, approve, and implement system-wide BMPs.
5. Eliminate, or have eliminated, illegal/illicit connections to
the storm drain system.
6. Identify the legal authority for control of discharges to the
storm drain system.
7. Provide to the COUNTY annual reports (on forms provided by the
COUNTY) and any other information needed to satisfy annual
reporting requirements of the RWQCBs.
8. Adopt and enforce, or name DISTRICT as enforcer of a water
pollution control ordinance, which prohibits non-NPDES
permitted discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer
system.
The COUNTY shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost
to the CITIES or the DISTRICT, undertake in the unincorporated areas
of the COUNTY all activities required above of the CITIES that are
not responsibilities of the DISTRICT as outlined in Section III. B.
The PERMITTEES hereby establish a Technical Advisory Committee
(herein called COMMITTEE) consisting of five members chosen by the
Orange County City Engineers Association, and one member
representing the COUNTY. The COMMITTEE shall prepare by-laws for the
Technical Advisory Committee and submit same to PERMITTEES for
approval. The COMMITTEE will act in an advisory role to the
7 5-31-02 Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IV.
Agreement D02-048
PERMITTEES and implement policy previously established by the
PERMITTEES.
PROGRAM COSTS
The responsibilities for payment of all shared costs of equipment,
services, contracted analytical services, and the cost of the Regional
Board permits, shall be distributed among the COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES
as follows:
Participants
Percentage Contribution
DISTRICT 10
CITIES + COUNTY
9O
The individual percentage contributions from each city and the COUNTY
shall be functions of their respective areas and population relative to
those of the entire County. Each area shall be calculated as one half of
the sum of the area and population fractions, multiplied by 90%. Excluded
are national forests, state parks, airports, landfills, oceans, harbors,
tidal bays and military installations (Exhibit A-l). The contribution of
the COUNTY shall be calculated from unincorporated areas and their
respective populations.
Share in percent for City #1 = {(Xl/Xtot) + (Y~/Y=ot)}/2 x (90)
X = area
Y = population
tot = total population or area
90 = total percentage excluding Flood Control District contribution
8 5-31-02 Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048i
The percentage share shall be calculated by the COUNTY Public Facilities
and Resources Department Environmental Resources Section from population
and area data. These calculations shall be completed by January 1 of each
year and shall be included in the annual budget proposal. The annual
budget proposal shall be recomputed for the thirty-six PERMITTEES based on
the following percentage share computation methods:
A. Countywide costs as provided in Exhibit B-1.
B. Regional costs specific to only one RWQCB permit as provided in
Exhibits B-2A and B-2B.
C. In the event of a regulatory directive issued to PERMITTEES, the COUNTY
shall provide immediate notice to the affected PERMITTEES and meet and
confer with them with respect to responding to the directive and
funding the immediate response.
Amended calculations and computation method for fiscal year 2002-03 are
provided in Exhibits B-I, B-2A and B-2B, which are made a part hereof.
If at any time during a given fiscal year the program costs exceed the sum
of the deposits, the COUNTY shall submit invoices to the CITIES to recover
the deficit, following the approval process described in Section
III.A.l.b. above. The share for each city shall be prorated according to
the formula above. Each city shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the
billing date.
The COUNTY shall prepare a fiscal year end accounting within 60 days of
the end of the fiscal year. If the fiscal year end accounting results in
costs (net of interest earnings) exceeding the sum of the deposits, the
9 ~31~2Fi~1
"1" ' -
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated share of the excess cost.
Each city shall pay the billing within 45 days of the date of the invoice.
If the fiscal year end accounting results in the sum of the deposits
exceeding costs (net of interest earnings), the excess deposits will carry
forward to reduce the billings for the following year.
The COUNTY shall invoice each city for its annual deposit at the beginning
(July 1) of each fiscal year. Each city shall pay the deposit within 45
days of the date of the invoice. Each city's deposit shall be based on
their prorated share of the approved annual budget, reduced for any
surplus identified in the prior fiscal year end accounting.
interest earned on the CITIES' deposits will not be paid to the CITIES,
but will be credited against the CITIES' share of the program costs.
Upon termination of the program a final accounting shall be performed by
the COUNTY. If costs (net of interest earnings) exceed the sum of the
deposits, the COUNTY shall invoice each city for its prorated share of the
excess. Each city shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the date of the
invoice. If the sum of the deposits exceeds the costs, the COUNTY shall
reimburse to each city its prorated share of the excess, within 45 days of
5he final accounting. Interest earnings are used to offset the CITIES'
share of program costs and will not be refunded to the CITIES.
Each city and the COUNTY shall bear the financial responsibility for
implementing the Program, within its jurisdictional boundaries, as
outlined in Section III. C. and D.
10
5-31-02 Final
l0
12
15
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
V. LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT
The life of the AGREEMENT shall be indefinite or as long as the WQA
mandates compliance.
vi. ADDITIONAL PARTIES
Any city which becomes signatory to this AGREEMENT after the applications
for the initial NPDES stormwater permits have been approved and any city
which becomes incorporated shall become a PERMITTEE on the NPDES
stormwater permit issued by its respective RWQCB and shall comply with all
of the provisions of this AGREEMENT. The date of initiation, for
determining participant costs for newly incorporated CITIES shall be the
date of incorporation, and for a city signing after NPDES stormwater
permit approval it shall be the date of the initial application for the
NPDES Stormwater permit. The costs for adding the additional parties to
the program, including additional permit and processing fees, shall be
paid by the added party. Monies to be reimbursed to the existing
PERMITTEES shall be credited to their respective annual program operating
fees for the following budget year.
VII. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE AGREEMENT
A participant may withdraw from the AGREEMENT 60 days subsequent to
written notice to the COUNTY. The COUNTY will notify the remaining
PERMITTEES within 10 business days of receipt of the withdrawal notice.
The withdrawing participant shall agree to file for a separate permit and
to comply with all of the requirements established by the RWQCB(s). In
addition, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture of the withdrawing
~arsicipant's deposit for the budget year of withdrawal. The withdrawing
participant shall be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a
11 ~31~2Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
consequence of withdrawal. The cost allocations to the remaining members
will be recalculated in the following budget year.
VIII. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
Any PERMITTEE found in non-compliance with the conditions of the permit
within their jurisdictional responsibilities shall be solely liable for
any lawfully assessed penalties, pursuant to Section 13385 of the Water
Code and the Federal Clean Water Act. Common penalties shall be calculated
according to the formula outlined in Section IV.
IX. LEGAL ACTION/ COSTS/ ATTORNEY FEES
where any legal action is necessary to enforce any provision hereof for
damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this
AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the
losing party all litigation and collection expenses, administrative costs,
witness fees and court costs including reasonable attorneys fees.
x. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT may be amended by consent of a majority of the PERMITTEES
which represent a majority of the percentage contributions as described in
Section IV. The COUNTY and the DISTRICT will represent one voting
PERMITTEE with a percentage contribution equal to the sum of the
individual contributions of the COUNTY and DISTRICT as described in
Section IV. No amendment to this AGREEMENT shall be effective unless it is
in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the
majority of PERMITTEES.
XI. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES
The County Director of the Public Facilities and Resources Department and
the respective City Managers, shall be authorized to execute the
application(s) for NPDES municipal stormwater permit(s) and take all other
12 ~31~2Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Agreement D02-048
procedural steps necessary to file the application(s) for NPDES municipal
stormwater permit(s).
XII. NOTICES
All notices shall be deemed duly given if delivered by hand; or three (3)
days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid.
XIII. GOVERNING LAW
This AGREEMENT will be governed and construed in accordance with laws of
the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this AGREEMENT
shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity,
legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not any way
be affected or impaired hereby.
XIV. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT WAIVER
No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused,
unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the
PERMITTEE to have waived or consented. Any consent by any PERMITTEE to, or
waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not
constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or
subsequent breach.
XV. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS
This document restates and amends the provisions in prior agreements and
constitutes the entire AGREEMENT between the PERMITTEES with respect to
the subject matter; all prior agreements, representations, statements,
negotiations and undertakings are superseded hereby.
XVI. EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT.
This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts and the signed counterparts
shall constitute a single instrument.
5-31-02 Final
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CITY OF TUSTIN
Date:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
, 2O02
Agreement D02-041
By:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4 5 5-31-02 Final
EXHIBIT A - 1
LAND AREA DEDUCTED FROM JURISDICTIONS
Landfills
Area sq miles
Jurisdiction
Olinda
Santiago
Prima Descheca
Bee Canyon
Coyote Canyon
0.89
0.25
2.34
1.13
1.09
County
County
County
County
County
State Parks
Alamitos State Beach
Bolsa Chica State Beach
Chino Hills State Park
Corona Del Mar State Beach
Crystal Cove State Park
Doheney State Beach
Huntington State Beach
San Clemente State Beach
0.002
0.27
4.09
0.05
6.30
0.40
0.20
0.18
Seal Beach
Huntington Beach
County
Newport Beach
County
Dana Point
Huntington Beach
San Clemente
Airports
Fullerton
John Wayne
0.11
0.78
Fullerton
County
Military facilities
MCAS Tustin
MCAS E1 Toro
Los Alamitos Armed Svs. Center
Seal Beach Weapons Station
2.40
6.25
2.07.
2.17
Tustin
County
Los Alamitos
Seal Beach
National Forests
Cleveland National Forest
86.75
County
49
EXHIBIT B - 1
Cost Sharing For Region Specific Elements
NPDES Permittee Shares of Revenue
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Permittee Population * Area (sq. mi.) '* Weighted Average Budget Share
Share of Revenue (%) FY 2002-2003
IAliso Viejo**' 40,166 7.15 1.168548686 $70,114
Anaheim 336,300 49.761 9.005630974 $540,344
Brea 36,100 10.954 1.399038534 $83,943
Buena Park 80,100 10.064 2.007224432 $120.435
Costa Mesa 110,900 15.480 2.8981 48677 $173,891
Cypress 47,150 6.925 1.258634332 $75,519
Dana Point 35,800 6.440 1.046705013 $62,803
Fountain Valley 55,900 9.553 1.595652357 $95,740
Fullerton 129,200 22.536 3.7231 43526 $223,391
Garden Grove 169,200 17.900 3.981247954 $238,877
Huntington Beach 193,700 27.283 5.080856025 $304,855
I r vine 150,1 O0 46.1 48 5.863460245 $351,811
La Habra 60,800 7.313 1.498466857 $89,909
La Palma 15,700 2.014 0.396815551 $23,797
:Laguna Beach 24,150 7.820 0.973824935 $58,430
Laguna Hills 33,900 6.626 1.031809811 $61,909
Laguna Niguel 63,200 15.003 2.127750971 $127,666
Laguna Woods*" 16,750 3.050 0.492569562 $29,554
Lake Forest 76,700 16.795 2.473428382 $1 48,407
Los Alamitos 11,750 4.256 0.508566627 $30,514
Mission Viejo 96,600 17.427 2.828184924 $169,693
Newport Beach 72,000 27.740 3.244247595 $194,657
Orange 132,800 23.329 3.839599305 $230,378
Placentia 47,600 6.606 1.240982586 $74,460
Rancho Santa Margarita*** 48,350 13.080 1.751218729 $105,074
San Clemente 52,500 17.697 2.170701556 $130,243
San Juan Capistrano 34,600 14.054 1.614764803 $96,887
Santa Ana 348,100 27.349 7.480695499 $447,646
;Seal Beach 24,500 10.660 1.197977061 $71,879
~Stanton 38,300 3.131 0.830259739 $49,816
Tustin 69,200 10.992 1.911061605 $114,665
Villa Park 6,125 2.088 0.255047196 $15,303
Westminster 89,900 10.190 2.167659672 $130,061
Yorba Linda 60,000 19.918 2.45714216 $147,430
County of Orange 117,634 86.846 8.499136117 $509,953
OCFCD 0 0.050 10 $600,006
TOTALS 2,925,775 684.178 100.00000 $6,000,063
' Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E-1 City/County Population Estimates with Annual
Percent Change January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
'* Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatics. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state
parks, airports, landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES Implementation Agreement.
'** Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cities are added onto the Implementation
Agreement.
EXHIBIT B - 2A
Santa Ana Region Water Quality Monitoring Element Cost Sharing
NPDES Permittee Shares of Revenue
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Permittee Population * Area (sq. mi.) ** Weighted Average Budget Share
Share of Revenue (%) FY 2002-2003
Anaheim 336,300 49.761 11.50900704 $81,714
Brea 36,100 10.954 1.825103021 $12,958
Buena Park 80,100 10.064 2.553351287 $18.129
Costa Mesa 110,900 15.480 3.69761647 $26,253
Cypress 47,150 6.925 1.608166546 $11,418
Fountain Valley 55,900 9.553 2.047696569 $14,539
Fullerton 129,200 22.536 4.780735697 $33,943
Garden Grove 169,200 17.900 5.040702925 $35,789
Huntington Beach 193,700 27.283 6.484102882 $46,037
I lrvine 150,100 46.1 48 7.651879999 .$54.328
La Habra 60,800 7.313 1.903863349 $13,517
La Palina 15,700 2.014 0.504819924 $3,584
Laguna Hills (17.77% in SAR) 6,024 1.177 0.236215028 $1,677
Laguna Woods'** (51.97% in SAR) 8,705 1.585 0.329114592 $2,337
Lake Forest (68.68% in SAR) 52,678 11.535 2.195733065 $15.590
Los Alamitos 11,750 4.256 0.666605749 $4,733
Newport Beach 72,000 27.740 4.259213593 $30,240
Orange 132,800 23.329 4.931287387 $35,012
Placentia 47,600 6.606 1.583054937 $11,240
Santa Ana 348,100 27.349 9.374656128 $66,560
Seal Beach 24,500 10.660 1.577568779 $11,201
Stanton 38,300 3.131 1.044262359 $7,414
Tustin 69,200 10.992 2.447280658 $17,376
Villa Park 6,125 2.088 0.333769321 $2,370
Westminster 89,900 10.190 2.749617183 $19,522
Yorba Linda 60,000 19.918 3.213274703 $22,814
County of Orange (48.15% in SAR) 56,641 41.816 5.451300812 $38,704
OCFCD 0 0.000 10 $71,000
TOTALS 2,409,472 428.304 100.00000 $710,000
* Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E-1 City/County Popula6on Estimates with Annual Percent Change,
January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
** Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatics. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state parks, airports,
landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES stormwater Implementation Agreement.
*** Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cities are added onto the Implementation Agreement.
EXHIBIT B - 2B
San Diego Region Water Quality Monitoring Element Costs Sharing
NPDES Permittee Shams of Revenue
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Permittee Population * Area (sq. mi.) ** Weighted Average Budget Share
Share of Revenue (%) FY 2002-2003
Aliso Viejo*** 40,166 7.15 5.564958394 $70,675
Dana Point 35,800 6.440 4.979452958 $63,239
Laguna Beach 24,150 7.820 4.362458062 $55,403
Laguna Hills (82.23% in SDR) 27,876 5.449 4.002585974 $50,833
Laguna Niguel 63,200 15.003 9.639674834 $124,964
Laguna Woods*** (48.03% in SDR) 8,045 1.465 1.12410208 $14,276
Lake Forest (31.32% in SDR) 24,022 5.260 3.612339217 $45,877
Mission Viejo 96,600 17.427 13.45055257 $170,822
IRancho Santa Margarita*** 48,350 13.080 7.990217078 $101,476
San Clemente 52,500 17.697 9.684824286 $122,997
San Juan Capistrano 34,600 14.054 7.072980193 $89,827
County of Orange (51.85% in SDR) 60,993 45.030 18.31585436 $232,611
OCFCD 0 0.000 10 $127,000
TOTALS 516,303 155.874 100 $1,270,000
* Source: State of California, Department of Finance, E-1 City/County Population Estimates with Annual Percent Change,
January 1, 2000 and 2001, Sacramento, California, May 2001.
** Source: Public Facilities and Resources Department - Geomatics. Area was calculated in
miles using the dry land area figures and subtracting areas in each jurisdiction for national forests, state parks, airports,
landfills and military installations as determined in the NPDES stormwater Implementation Agreement.
*** Source: County of Orange will cover the program costs until the cities are added onto the Implementation Agreement.