Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09 FINAL TRACT MAP 17404
w I Agenda Item 9 Reviewed: AGENDA REPORT City ManagerIL Finance Director MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, INTERIM CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: FINAL TRACT MAP 17404 PROPERTY OWNERS: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 DEPARTMENT OF NAVY 1455 FRAZEE ROAD, SUITE 900 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108 SUMMARY: APPLICANT: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 Final Tract Map (FTM) 17404 is a subdivision of a 627.9 acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for conveyance and financing purposes only. On September 6, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-60 approving Tentative Tract Map 17404. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 11-70 approving Final Tract Map 17404 to subdivide a 627.9 acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes only. FISCAL IMPACT This is a City initiated application. Fees related to the preparation of FTM 17404 have been appropriated in the current budget. City Council Report September 20, 2011 FTM 17404 Page 2 DISCUSSION Site and Surroundings The project site is generally bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Armstrong Road to the west. The project area is located entirely within Tustin Legacy (Attachment A — Location Map). FTM 17404 consists of approximately 627.9 acres of land and is located within Neighborhoods B, D, and a portion of G of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Planning Areas 7, 8, 13-15) as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Final Tract Map 17404 FTM 17404 is being proposed as a financing and conveyance map only and would subdivide the project site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots (Attachment B). No development in conjunction with this map is being proposed. Future development of the project site will be subject to approval of a Concept Plan and Design Review which City Council Report September 20, 2011 FTM 17404 Page 3 will facilitate the development on the proposed lots consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed FTM 17404 has been analyzed for conformity with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, applicable City of Tustin guidelines and standards, and applicable mitigation measures identified in the certified FEIS/EIR. In addition, the Public Works Department has reviewed the map and determined that the proposed map is in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Tustin City Code Section 9323 et al (Subdivision Code). ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. An environmental check list was prepared for the proposed project that concluded no additional environmental impacts would occur from approval of the project (Exhibit A of Resolution No. 11-60). The proposed project is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and is determined not to result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantial changes, or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. No mitigation measures are required for the proposed subdivision of the site for conveyance and financing purposes. In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Council considered the checklist and found that it is complete and adequate prior to approving the Tentative Tract Map 17404 by adopting Resolution No. 11-60 on September 6, 2011. Elizabeth A. Binsack Ict g S. Stack Community Development Director of Public Works/City Engineer Attachments: A. Location Map B. Final Tract Map 17404 C. City Council Resolution No. 11-60 D. Resolution No. 11-70 ATTACHMENT Location Map City of Tustin CITY OF TUSTIN - [Created: 7/13/2011 10:45:36 AM] [Scale: 3676.91] [Page: 8.5 x 11 / Portrait] Map Display Legend City Limits Intersections v, Centerlines FWY 'Private Parcels Railroad Centerlines Limits A (c) 2004.1 www.GeoPhwAET (C) 2002-1 GeoPrise.net (GeoVec, Inc.) - (888)422-2505 01 13677ft ATTACHMENT B Final Tract Map 17404 SHEET 1 OF 37 SHEETS 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, ��''''"[� A 'hV, TRACT ■ • � T ■ - O• 17404 ACCEPTED AND FILED AT THE REQUEST OF T O LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST AMERICAN COMPANY LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE BEING LOTS 1, Z 4 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE 2( 25 THROUGH 34, INCLUSIVE, 36 AND DAZE: LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, A PORTION OF LOT 24 OF TRACT NO. 17026, PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 884, PAGES TIME: FEE: $ LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE 1 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE AND A PORTION OF LOT 76 IN BLOCK 46 OF IRVINE'S THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, 23, 24, 26 THROUGH 48, INCLUSIVE, 50, 54 THROUGH ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK I PAGE 88, BOTH OF INSTRUMENT N0. (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. BOOK PAGE V`<, Py (q BY TOM DALY HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. COUNTY CLERK — RECORDER RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 BY DEPUTY FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE: SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING ALL PARTIES HAVING ANY RECORD TIT,.E INTEREST IN THE LAND METED THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY COSBY THIS MAP, DO HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID - tN CONFORMANC' WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURUVISON MAP ACT AND LOCAL F MA, AS SHO WN WITHIN THE OISTINGTIVE BORDER LINE ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION IN AUGUST, 2007. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER ANO OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN SUCH POSITIONS; AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, OWNER AS TO LOTS i THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDIFONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THROUGH 21, INCLUSIVE, 23, 24, 26 THROUGH 48, INCLUSIVE, 50, 54 THROUGH 56, INCLUSIVE, A THROUGH N, INCLUSIVE, R, T THROUGH Z. INCLUSIVE, AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, AAA THROUGH RRR, INCLUSIVE, ITT, VW, WWW, YYY, ZZZ, AAAA THROUGH LLL_, INCLUSIVE, NNNN, PPPP THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, — �S NO S�` AAAAA, BBBBB AND IIIII THROUGH OOOOO, INCLUSIVE, V`<, Py (q BY RORY 5. YAW*AMS, L.S. B65i DATE CITY MANAGER THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY AS OWNER OF LIFOC AREAS; LOTS 22, 25, 49, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, LOT 0, LOT P. LOT O, LOT S, LOT SSS, LOT UUU, .LOT XXX, LOT MMMM,LOT 0000, LOT CCCCC. LOT DDODD, LOT EEEEE, LOT FFFFF, LOT GOODS AND LOT HHHHH: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THESE LEGG AREAS WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA AFTER SITE CLOSURE IS ATTAINED AND THE GOVERNMENT ISSUES A FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER. BY ELi ZABEM _ARSON REAL ESTATE CONTRACTING OFFICER AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, BENEFICIARY UNDER A DEED OF TRUST RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007000753417 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BY: NAME: TITLE: NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF CALIFORNIA l CGI OF NAME: 1171E ON BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED ____ _ _ WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO ME WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED ME SAME IN HIS/HER/TFEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HEA/THEIR SIGNATURE(/) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. WITNESS MY HAND: SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PLACE Of BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE IN COUNTY (NAME PRINTED) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MY COMMISSION NO.. STATE OF CAUFORNIA COUNTY OF f ON BEFORE ME, PERSONALLY APPEARED WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(/) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOV&EDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/IUUR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(ES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/HEIR SIGNATURES) ON THE INSTRUMENT 'HE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON IO HAU OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECU LEO .HE INSTRUMENT-. 1 CURREY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER Pit LAWS OF -,ITE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT_ WITNESS MY HANG-: SIGNATURE___ MY PRINCIPAL PLAGE OF BUSINESS IS NOTARY I UMUC IN AND FOR SAID A51 TE IN COUNTY (NAME PRINTED} MY COMMSS?ON EXPIRES: MY COMMISSION NO_^ _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA I` COUNTY DF J s ON BEFORE ME, _ PERSONALITY APPEARED WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY CADENCE TO BE INE PERSONS) WHOSE NAMES) P/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO ME WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNMEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME 'HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORT2E0 CAPACITY(.ES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/-,FEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE ROMER ENT THE PERSON(S), OR ENTITY UPON BFF ALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE` OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT, WITNESS MY HAND: SIGNATURE MY PRINCIPAL PEACE Of BUSINESS IS NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID $TATE IN COUNTY. —_(NAMEPRINTED) _ MY CUMMfSSfON EXPIRED -- MY COMMISSION NO.: CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND 1T TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TENTATIVE MAP, IF REQUIRED, AS FILED WITH, AMENDED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION; THAT ALL PROVSIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND CITY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. DATED THIS DAY OF_ 2011. DOUGLAS S. STACK, R.C.E. 54637 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS THE CITY OF T-JSTIN EXPIRATION DATE: 12/3)/11 COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT: I H=REBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND HAVE FOUND THAT ALL MAPPING PROVSIONS OF THE SU3D?VISI0N MAP ACT HAVE" BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND : AM SATISFIED SAID MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT, DATED THIS __DAY CF_..__ 2011. RAYMOND - MATHS, COUNTY SURVEYOR L. 5, 6185, EXPIRATION DATE: 3/31/12 COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO "HFRECORDS OF MY OFFICE THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP OR ANY PART THEREOF FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOT YET PAYABLE, AND DO ALSO CERTIFY TO THE RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH REGARDING DEPOSITS TT -D SECURE THE PAYMENT OF TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLEC7ED AS TAXES ON THE LAND COVERED BY THIS MAP. GATED THIS _DAY OF 2011 SHARI DENRICH BY: COUNTY TREASURER -TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TREASURER—TAX COLL'E'CTOR CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA(I COUNTY OF ORANGES ss. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PRESENTED FOR APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE DAY OF 2011 AND THAT THEREUPON SND COUNCIL DC, BY AN ORDER DULY PASSED AND ENTERED, APPROVE SAID MAP, AND DO A, 50 APPROVE SUBJECT MAP PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436(,)(3) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, DATED MIS --------DAY OF. _—___....20'1. PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TJ57N SEE SHEET 2 FOR SIGNATURE OMISSIONS SHEET 2 OF 37 SHEETS 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) BASIS OF BEARINGS TRACT NO. 17404 IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 THE REACH ;S SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING BETWEEN OC.S. HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION GPS NO. 6576 AND STATHM GPS NO, 6527Rl BEING N`47'020 PER RECORDS ON FI -E IN THE OFFICE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SURVEYOR, DATUM STATEMENT: COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYS''_EM (CCGD5), ZONO %4 1983 HAS, (1991.35 MUCH OS GPS ADJUSTMENT), ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND UNLESS 01HERMSE NOTED TO OBTAIN GRID GSTANCE MULTPLY GROUND DISTANCE BY 099997770 (SCALE FACTOR IS PROJECT SPECFND) RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES (} INDICATES RECORD DATA AS NOTED. i INDICATES RECORD AND MEASLRU) DATA R1 tNDICATES RG, 92-1023, R.S.B. 1391E-2 NO INDOAFLS R.B. N0, 2000-1002, R.S.B. 181141-47, R3 INDICATES RS, NO, 2002-1058, RSB. 194/19-27. R4 INDICATES RD, NO. 47-1015, R,SB. 165/31-39, RE INDICATES N_S_ NO, 86-1041, R.S.D. 114/1-3. R6 INNCA?FS RED. 12/43, R7 INDICATES BOOK 1180, PAGE 12, C.R. R8 INDICATES BOOK 6661, PAGE 721, O.A. R9 INDICATES CORNER RECORD 97-072 RIO INDICATES TRACT NU 17144, M.M. _/------ BIT _.,211 INDICATES TRACT NO. 17026, M,M_ 884/1-14, BOUNDARY ESTABLISHMENT NOTE: SEARCHERFOUND NOTHING AT BCYJNDAR. CORNERS ANDA ANGLE POINTS OF (ONTRCF LINES, ESTARLI HHD AT "(;(AD LOGAGON PER WI, EXCEPT AS NOTED HEREON PER AICNC'1AENT NOTES MONUMENT NOTES: 2' !F, TAGGED L.S. 6654 OR LEAD, TACK & TAS LS 6654 OR NAIL & TAG I P 6654 OR 8" S&W STAMPED S. 6654 TO FIE SET A- ALI TRACT HOHNOARY CORNERS WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED_ NO MONUMENTS ME[ B_ SET AT INTEPOR LOT CORNERS, RTFSF ML;, 3E SET BY OR BECOME OBSCLETT ON FUTURE TRACTS. i INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTFD. M1 ESTABLISHED BLOCK LINE S4W39'04'W 1.00' FROM ED. 51CW STAMPED YS 5831` PER R' AND R3. O.(lS, CPS 6576 N 2,197.725.170 _` 6,084,556.279 M2 ESTAP,LISHE(: AT INIERSECI ON OF ONES OFFSET MTGE SOUTRIBUST Of LINES P -,{ROUGH Mi, MEN AND M6. FD. PK NAd AND TAG 'ORANGE COUNTY ."-;RVEYCR', PER RI?, 536'57'38 i T,02, FLASH, 43 FD, NAIL AND BRASS TAG (It1EGIE.E) PER R3, OCS GPS 6558 M4 TO. T ./2' MASS CAP STAMPED 'LS 3246' IN WELL MONUMENT DOWN 1.29' PER R3, O.C.S. GPS 6552. M5 FD 2 1/2' BRASS CRP STAMPED "LS 3248` M WF.L MONUMENT, GOWN 1.2PER R3, MF ED_ 3 1/2" BRASS DISC, NOT STAMPED, IN WELL MONUMENT DOWN LS' PER R3. M7 TO, 2 BRASS CAP STAIRPED 'LS 3248' K WELL MUNJMENT DOWN 171 PE: R3`, O,C.S. GPS 6555. M8 FD. NOTHING. ESTABLISHED AT INTERSECT.ON CF LINES OFFSET 30DTF SOUTHWEST /ROM USES THROUGH M 40. M6 AND Mi O. NOTE: R3 SF DISTANCE FROM M2 TO MB AS 5262.78'5262.78'P5284,96' THEREON) AND DISTANT FROM M8 TO M9 AS 2645.09' (2642.92' HEREON), SAID DISTANCES WERE CALCDLATED ON SAID R3 U9NG THE SAME INTERSECTION O 30.00' OFFSET USES AS ON THIS SURVEY (I.E, SAME PROCEDURE). ii APPEARS THAT SAID R3 HAD AN ERROR .N CALCULATION: USING MEASURED DATA ON SAID R3, THESE TWO O{_TANCES CALCULATE AS 528496' AND 2642.92', P,ESPECYVELY M9 70'3. SAW STAMPED 'LOO ERIN FRANK' 1S 31FF&E. ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINT 1NTERSECTI N PER R3, FE ISH MID ED, 3' O.C.S. BRASS DISC, NOT STAMPED, DOWN 0GV PER R3, OGS. CPS 65M Mtt FD_ 3 1/2' BRASS CAP STAMPED '9 - 10' IN WELL MONUMENT, DOWN RED' PEH R1 OGS GPS 6529. N 2,206,043.606 E 6,078,864355 MI FD. HEX BAR IN WELL, DOWN 1.34 PER R3. O,C,S. GPS 6528 N 2,208.097,505 E 6,080,581577 M13 ED. BRASS NAIL AND WASHER STAMPED OLS FRIG' FLUSI IN EPDXY, IN LIEU OF PUNCHED SPIKE AND WASHER, MONUMENT WAS RESET PER CORNER RECORL' 2001-850 (FOUND TN DE:ERHM, SOCA) D.C.S. DEC 652721_ N 2,209,806.138 E '"0,082,050.201 M14 F0. NOTHING. ESTABLIS4ED BY INTERSECTION AT PkCi ONGATION OF LINE FROM MS THROUGH MIT, AND PROLONGATION OF LIME FROM M17 THROU011 1118, M15 ED 3 1/2" ALUMINUM CAP IN CONICS, TE MARKED '10 ?i - 45 - 46 30' WIC." PER R3, SHOWN AS )ES7ROYEO ON RG FOUND IN PLACE UY THIS SURVLY, DRAFT 0.4", 016 FD. NOTHING. ESTABLISHED 30.07 FROM NIS ON LINE: THROUGH ME 417 EAS' CORNER LOT 189, BLOCK 62, M.R.M. './88, §D. DOTHAN, SET NOP -,Y- . EST. ON PROD, O SE -Ly USE OF LOT 189 AT RECORD DISTANCE (75.60) PER RA M18 T1 +JNCHED 1/Z HE BRASS CA I4 OCS WELL MJNJAEN7, DOWN .34' PER R4. ACCEPTED 11 AFTNESS CORNER TO EAST CORNER OF LD '.89, BLOCK 6c M R M 1/88, - R4 OCS CPS 96573. NIS ED, 3-1/4' ALUM CAP STAMPED 'CITY OF fRVINE LOT :89, 193, 190, 195 ELK 62, PLS 4215' PER R3, O -S. CPS 6715. N 4201,20B,220 F_ FYBB,YGL666 M20 FEN, NOTHING. ESTAFUSHED AT RECORD ANGd ANO DISTANCE FROM MR) AND dd18 PER R5. M21 FD, 2' BRASS DISC WITH SCREW IN CQYC. PER P.M. O. M-151, TIM B, 243/ 5-8, OF 0.2. M22 ED. NOTHING FSTABUSHED ON UNE-HROUCH MOD, PARALLEL AND 750.00' NORTHEAST OF M21 PER R3, R5, R6 AND R7: M23 FD. NOTH!NC. ESTADUSHED BY ?NTERSFCTION, LUTE TO -`-_AST ESTABLISHED AT RECORD ANGLE (135.) FROM M20 AND M19 PER R8 AND R7, LINE TO N0.",",HAEUT EFFIGIES ID HOLDING M21 AND LINE PARALLEL AND 750,00' SQJTH'W=ST OF UNE FROM MOB THROLGH M22 PER R6 AND R7_ MONUMENT NOTES (CONTD): M24 FD_ 2' PUNCHED BRASS OISC iN WELL MONUMENT STAMPED 'LS 4868' PER 43, DOWN 1.3'. M25 ED, 3 1/4' ALUMINUM DISC STAMPED 'CITY OF 'RINE, JGHNSCN-FRANK PLS 4215 RV. SUE. BIOCR 46 LOT 90 LOT 89 BLOCK 42 LOT 102` PER R3, DOWN OB'. M26 ED, NOTHILNG. ESTABLISHED AT RECORD LOCATION PER R3. F0, 1 1/2' i.P. IN CONCRETE TAGCLO "USN, LTAS 1942, LS_ 2201' PER R3 AND R6, N A*2CO2'W 0.65'. P27 FD. PUNCHED SPIKE W/TAC RCE 22015 PER R9, N04°58'28'" 0.00'. P28 F0. GEAR SPIKE & TAG RCE 14488 PER R4 AT INTERSECTION OF FLOCK ONE AND CENIERLNE OF EDINGER. M29 ED. EAT & TAC RCE 22015 IN TO PER RC M30 TO, 1-1/2" IP W BRASS TAG STAMPED 'L5 4140' PER R4, 7049°20'21'W 0.18'. HEIR FOR LARGEST LAE. M31 HE SPIKE AND O.GS. BRASS TAG PER R2 N T02'09'W 0.10' FROM B.C. HELD FOR TANGENT :JNE. SPIKE AND NO TAG PER RS NOT FOUND, KOSFO, 2' LP. TAG4YD "LS. 4965' PER R7,M33 F0. SkW STAMPED 'LS 4965" PER R2, IA 57'5'."E OTT, M34 ED, NOTHING. ESTABLISHED B.C. HOLONO TANGENT LINE FROM SOUTH (TPROUCH M32 AND MOD) AND RECORD RADIUS TO NGRiHI0kST (180000') FROM M36 PER R2 U35 FD. i' LP. 'TAGGED 7.S. 54;1', PER III, ACCEPTED AS CENTREINE B.C. PER 91, R2 AND R3, W37 IT, 2 1/4' O.C.S. BRASS DISC PER R2. MONUMENT PER R3 NOT FOUND, FLUSH. M38 F0, 3 1/4' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "CITY Of TUSTIN PLS 4215, FLESH PER Rl, R2 AND R3, M39 F0. 3'1/4" A_UMINUM CAP STAMPED 'GTI OF?RNNE PTS 4215', FLUS-+ PER R1 AND R1 M40 FD, 3 1/4' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED 'CITY OF TUSTIN PLS 4215', FLUSH PER R1 AND R3. Mot FO. 2 f/1 BRASS CAP STAMPED -L S. 3246' IN CCS WTI, PER R1 AND R3, DOWN 14'_ M42 FD I&T ID 5282 IN LIEU OF 2' I.P. TAGGED "LS 52€2', PER R3, N74°02'25',' 0.16', FLUSH, V43 ED I.&T 1S 5262 IN LLU OF 2' I.P. TAGGED 'LS 5282', PER R3, N22°42'30'W 0.59'. M44 FO L&T 'S 5282 IN LIEU Of 2' TO, TAGURD 'LS $282', PER R3, N23`37TO"W M45 PD, 2" I.P. TAGGED 'LS 5287 PER R3, N82 -CO -587 0.09', TO LAT "LS 5282", PER 211, 7073"3542T 877. M46 FI _S TAGGED 'LS 5282' PER R3, S87"37'04'E 0.09'. M47 NE 2' ,P. TAGGED .S 5282' PER R3, N4S' 3''22"W 0.47', ED LAT °LS 5282' PER R3, N37"5l1'15'E 9.05'. M48 INDICATES SPIKE AND WASHER TAGGED "LS 7038" TO BE SET LFR TRACT MAP NO. ';5'695, M.M, 868/1-9, M49 INDICATES 2" I.P. TAGGED 'LS 7038', OR SPIKE AND WASHER 'LS 7039', OR LEAD, TACK AND YAG 'LS 7038' TO BE SET PER TRACT NO, 15695, MM 866/1-9, MSO INGCAt S FD. LEAD, TACK A, TAG 'l5 6054" PER R'E :T_USTI 0,51 INDICATES E$, 2' 1,P, TAGGED 1S. 6654' PER R11. V52 INDICATES SEARCHED FOUND NOTHING. ESTABLISHED AT RECORD ANCLS AND DISTANCE FROM FOUND MONUMENTS PER RID, Mai INDICATES FD, 8' S&iN STAMPED 1G. 6654' PER Rtl. FLUSH, M54 INDICATES ED. NAIL & TAG 'LS. 6654" PER Ol, FT,IISH. M55 N. S' S&W S?AMMD %.S 6654' PER CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED OC`OBER 17, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT N0, 2007000634945, OR, FLUSH. M56 ED 3 1/4' ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "CITY OF TUSTIN PLS 4215' PER R1 AND R3, FLUSH. SIGNATURE OMISSIONS PURSIA `O:E PROVIGIONS OF SECRON 66436 (a)(3) D THE 1MIDITI O4 MAP ACT, 1H1 FOGOWNG 9GN1TJRE`; HAVE BEEN OMITTED: IRt4NE RANCH WATER DGTLCT, HOLDER Or AN EASEMENT FOR PHLINFS ARE INCIDEN`AE PURPOSES RECORDED 5£PTEMBM 1, 1971 TY BOOK 9788, PAGE. 771 OF OFF)MAL RECORDS, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED MAY '4, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20020,0ED 4594 AND RE-REOOROAPRIL 9, 2003 AS INS"-RUMENT NO 2003000392129; MAY 14, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2002C404597; MAY 14, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 29020404598 AND MAY 9, 2003 AS tNSTRUMEN7 N0. 2GC03T0053338i, AL1, Or OFFICIAL RECORDS (ALL NOT PLOITABL.), THE CITY OF '-USTN, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS RECORDED MAY 14, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO, 20020404599 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS (NOT PLOTTMLE) ANJ HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES AS SHOMd OR. TRACT NU 17OZ6, MR. 864/1-14. SOUTHERN OATEN 'A EDISON COMPANY, A. CORPORATION, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UNUTIES AND INGOENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED JANUARY 10, 2007 A; INSTRUMENT NO. 2007000016377 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASEMENT NOTES: OINOICAT:S AN EASEM SO FOR ESPEUNES A U INCIDENTAL PURPOSES N FAY'Ott OF !ROME RANCH WA eq DISTRICT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1971 IN BOOK 978h CAG, . 771, O OPTICAL RECORDS INS Cr11T5 AN EASEMENT ~'ON FLOOD CON' OL PURP0.SES IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF TIISON PER TRACT SO. 17026, MM. 884/1-14_ INCCA.ES AN £ASEMEUT FOR PUB IC J. UTAS AN INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF DLT" RN CALIFORNIA EDISON COAPAY A CORPORATION RESTATED JANUARY 10, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007000016377 OF OFPIOAL RECORDS, NOTES: SOTS A THROUCH L INCLUSIVE, K THROUGH Z, INCILCT E, AA THROUGH 27, TNCL,1311 AND AAA THROUGH UW, :NCLUSIVE, ARE FOR OPEN SPACE /PARK PURPOSES. LOT J IS FOR OPEN SPACE/ FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES LOTS XXX NROUGH ZZZ, NCLU9VT, AAAA THROUGH 7721 NCLJSIPL ANG AAAAA THROUGH OCCUR LNCLOSEF ARE FOR STREET PURPOSES. - Fv C Yi c� CD o / > \ Cl) LAJ OD �T (^� o y�@� C) y I yx 107 P"1G N Q, Ca UJoNN C7 N / F V p d <00 fc ✓ N �� N� N i to ■ Z 0= oco I'.. (n O¢ v .,,, J Q rr CLi� N N N F- tQ W Z m j l� 4) -5' 1. U U 0 o� 1-1 F- x O F w J ---� �.. N Y a ¢ ,�r�+� FF- N a ,,. „'�rY U N O W Z W J / ��Lul y+y/.+ CY # I QQ F- z° LO �2 ® O7 AK AP iy LO e �\ m uNi 09x001 LO M r sial Opp1 ,,b l U c /.. lCl IT > > > v t5 -N=Nxmm x b, 0609�oO¢imF y bib\SPS c� jQ LL "pZ Ww -,n X o0 < W'mv�wv�0�� `J S 0.000000(7 -� (ll.NN _1�Isssgd G F- LU s * ttM,tt tcsot xs>,oz.eeNl W ui 3nN3/iY / ,YS 9004 M„Si LY.15N 3_ tl�(,>Z 9li 3 co C6 NIDNIGI j z 12 Q S Uz a z t¢�', ` �y l• �53Wt'6 m W t9 W o O~ F z_ O z V < o `v mil tlb]5L 617 39 ,ftf.06N] ZS "�F $2 <_ �ti�y� PV NUE tr[ts9v1 a7, O O 3l1INa °v z�yO F z 133 VINVS NOW= c� o W W Z ail 3nN3nV oA_ VIDN33Vn I lij 96 965 �. , M.tr$fi1�66N] X cv Qom. Q 8 S : .y: l OC� N �j S R i1i t '��, �> > m z, 3nN3nv W ° W o o iiia gq W ° <� U Zo Q C, o C/i..., r0 01 \ /, F- LL a. LU 1—Q LL,y cc t a U K ` -✓ 4 c) V N ¢ Q� v d' �% Z! W = F O 3nN3/ A i F m, N3NNVM _ ol, /'4 91 I o� ryes Ll -Ci Ld ❑j',d }_}_�U • �'� • • Muzof LL)• N N Z a V lJN N3Al.l \TJ ti(,Sfi"Z 9Z M,lt,fit.fi4h] �- - tlF(AR t6Z9 M,L564.6 ] ; ' I Y➢Ch.p�N] W> X30 - .. _ . Z 3 v U p .... �_ .. - 4} J Z njO • --- ,li�Z6 ZV6Z M,tf,Bt.59N] - { 96'99LS •.5..cn z::N N N O w t.Yj,lt 4Z, Z 1? N N = kVMNNVd VDNVNNVB W, zn O ¢2=xmq� J �I ce W w IOtt W�tQQ_QQQQ JXJX((sQQ[��O O F E Q Q 6 X Q O W z }-- ce W Z; N8 .030 00o� x InNIAV MN103 a x ILLJ LLJ W ,. ._ :', _✓ ttt[Pf SLbl M,S4AZ,6iN] _ _ its-��5 .p _. Lu H i 1 "a°o-os�1 a T g Z W 4`l is ��i--ai+] ' W F ZW � LL z L j w o pzo- atlA mmow m m a w PSE <<,C4f 94Z � O W ¢ v�N Uti P--- - /1 O W = W W mCOWugm r AS CL i �/10 O W / ''LU r1 W "¢ U�- ��� z = U � �! � �� Q �g � J � ! v, W LU UJ z IN 0 Y / V � � � ttaibrsiac .x.zo.¢,e4N] ,V�/ S J Z � let W rr \ O°' 60 .ry5 N i m Sy All \;APIC c� C;) z w 165 .> > m V U W� N J= � yZ'oo. Ism L8006 0 N, m g L.% W _ z — O[,l N Z W ..— f.4Nb tlk(f6549t) .laCw 9sfij "' f4426j— Z � +-- ;� l.2(,9698Z5 .1Y M,CS 6.,84N� � ` kVAAMVd VJNVNNYO � � z w ro oOO¢s¢xo,< .Ox wTv O"�¢� x WFW inrm X C7LL YZ ZW Y Z mIU IW 4 O _B x U m 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 9 m m N J� 1 J J J 4 RJ "I'll, OZ -0 zo laz =,I= mo�w woo. W . <W . CC W 0 CL z oo Dost a• F- Ld W 2 Vi w w Ld z LU C] W2 0n CD z Z 0 rr < to w Fz Z ozaw Z , L QT < 0 "I'll, OZ -0 zo laz =,I= mo�w woo. W . <W . CC W 0 CL z oo Dost a• wa,l • .At 3 gra IAIACI 11344ON Ig 5 ce gg to ul 0--y----- — LU > ui 117— > 13, Z-- I x • W� 0 (1) 0 f w Z Z �o z u'U'a') kVAANNVd VDNVANVO 0 N N w Wp N. co ZR o ce ce ne 0 cc = x: P 0 0 cm 0- 2. 0'. Lu LU < 6 gg x • ce O w ce LU W wwowP < NAAWd VDNVNNVO =.29-00 oo� --D wa,l • .At 3 gra IAIACI 11344ON Ig 5 ce gg to ul 0--y----- — LU > ui 117— > 13, Z-- I x • W� 0 (1) 0 f w Z Z �o z u'U'a') kVAANNVd VDNVANVO 0 N N w Wp N. co ZR o ce ce ne 0 cc = x: P 0 0 cm 0- 2. 0'. Lu LU < 6 gg x • ce O w ce LU W wwowP < NAAWd VDNVNNVO =.29-00 oo� SHEET 7 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1" = 801 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) TRACT NO. 17404 BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, STATE RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, OF CALIFORNIA MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. AND NOTES. RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4 5 AND 6 FOR m N6'oj 42w �� $) =v M51 Nn9'20'45'W 103331 1 I ,-„] 6914294 e -t }01 •..9.26 t LOT JJJJ \ EDINGER AVENUE DETAIL "A" K N.I.S. CJRrF IA- ('UR4E OQ RAYt15 LE tN ' !1 92 S 0 677 C2 B 7.] 900 914 $: ,3_ 92146 -600 858 n V02107' 67 100 6. 1 L5pM21* 24.361 x021 C7__ 4 9.3. 42 Do _11V C9 9 O9 .3 500 14.33' G9 - 2 37 8 X740 1 5.91 �f 4'OB i3 2B 50 129' , N LU W � N4Y2 PH If @ LU LU 1n TRACT 1\10, 17026 BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. EDINGER AVENUE m ci , -�flAD W N51°a]i W M50 t2LM \ M51 La 51 C•�•-�1.. MS ---§}65 `-44 M51• M51 EDINGER AVENUE IGPS PE 46 I; 0.025 AC. M51 lt1 -a. 1 900 8419 869.52' -- N:fC'3 44W 229.27 n,8g L]-=,_ 301 f5 N 1 1329. • C9 _ Nq8°N'n6"W 33963'-�- 929 D35� � 55�� 1 N50°3945SEEM 39595 N2 y-2•i6e t941'�.• �/ �` LOT M A 21' 0.57 L=x2.56' DE7AL eAR AY'S0 E� R=241 HEREON pqj .- ' EDINGER AVENUE 1 - 0.525 AC. t$ ~ fw68'33 a0 R=SO.OG L=58.93 - I 1 i. i _ . lNE IINV R AME —BEARINm i G LENGiH �� `oI �. VAR',ES , Lt L2 L3 NS 6°E 4 9 53 NS9'ovW 530 'W 36.11' 21.W' 5256 m N6'oj 42w �� $) =v M51 Nn9'20'45'W 103331 1 I ,-„] 6914294 e -t }01 •..9.26 t LOT JJJJ \ EDINGER AVENUE DETAIL "A" K N.I.S. CJRrF IA- ('UR4E OQ RAYt15 LE tN ' !1 92 S 0 677 C2 B 7.] 900 914 $: ,3_ 92146 -600 858 n V02107' 67 100 6. 1 L5pM21* 24.361 x021 C7__ 4 9.3. 42 Do _11V C9 9 O9 .3 500 14.33' G9 - 2 37 8 X740 1 5.91 �f 4'OB i3 2B 50 129' , N LU W � N4Y2 PH If @ LU LU 1n TRACT 1\10, 17026 LOT Y 1.685 At LOT KKKK ,.795 Ac"49'21 VALENCIA RA7 fF1t'S924'R,1650E real 50 ------------ t ( 7 Na16z6YE 961 N B 716 N o' 4 9AG PR N44'0422 979 -� Y VAWES al YAWS X10'42'97"R 163 D34.27' - 1 N56 — D PRC N522555'W: -RAD-;;K ;_ I I ^ 66 PAD 6m JE YE xsW 1 82 78' N46 IKO6'W , RAD IT 74125N i X47"39'17 R-10.00" 09'2i'29'N 215fi 5 n 6' ,i °z 67 66• fr39 5862 R®10.00 L 6.5 14 8' M 2486°3933' 5.3J'-. N49.4246 % 13711 I` I N40'19'15'E 149 -v:," i81W w WAS SFE DETAIL N49.2o45Y1 265351 ,� HEREON --- 925 02 � ♦ :., 5,' AVENUE m 664 r � N49 20 S W SaS.Dn' 1 0 � — _— n9'20'4SW A-`I'OTA4' N49'21'37'w }84}2' � � 3 L=860 6-„ 19'0.5 LOT U R 3500'L=691' 1 I 0 0.454 AC. ` ` N.A P. 11IJjVJ,, 83-4111-14 SEE SHEET 15 BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. EDINGER AVENUE N49°20 5 n 2x]531' 's"'' LOT JJJJ { , EDINGER AVENUE _... \ o N49"2C45W io33.3t' 0.025 AC. M51 lt1 -a. 1 900 8419 869.52' -- N:fC'3 44W 229.27 n,8g L]-=,_ 301 f5 N 1 1329. • C9 _ Nq8°N'n6"W 33963'-�- 929 D35� � 55�� 1 N50°3945SEEM 39595 N2 y-2•i6e t941'�.• �/ �` LOT III) A 21' 0.57 L=x2.56' DE7AL eAR AY'S0 E� R=241 HEREON pqj .- ' EDINGER AVENUE 1 - 0.525 AC. t$ ~ fw68'33 a0 R=SO.OG L=58.93 - I 1 i. i _ . lNE IINV R AME —BEARINm i G LENGiH �� `oI �. VAR',ES , Lt L2 L3 NS 6°E 4 9 53 NS9'ovW 530 'W 36.11' 21.W' 5256 14y 91C4'W N504831°W 5 ]I__,y 589 ,5 i9 50 394 'W 33 '• N59'O25a'W 65• 1 -- L9 Na 220 1Y4Ii -05`W 38.9• 04 6' FA0�� 1 VAWES 1 411 02 N28'26'42'E 1128' ` t 1 I L 3 L15 Nay, .132°W NC M46"W 36 69` 11W I � I EIJ 4 50 }9 4 i 5 r°i •' Lt 2 '85 3915E I N82°1p i W 102 7In S, l it ' uda 1145 .1�u6�z6ow !. ae- 10 4 I _ -aB 5309'F 32'5 _ �1'4 0 r N0595F14.9'fi•'. it 1 4 s39.rz 1.5 2 U N4120 n5' DETAIL "B" a� - co i 20.260 AC. IDI VARIES VARIES — `.- s — LU 'I Ld RAD x i 2 1� W LOT Y 1.685 At LOT KKKK ,.795 Ac"49'21 VALENCIA RA7 fF1t'S924'R,1650E real 50 ------------ t ( 7 Na16z6YE 961 N B 716 N o' 4 9AG PR N44'0422 979 -� Y VAWES al YAWS X10'42'97"R 163 D34.27' - 1 N56 — D PRC N522555'W: -RAD-;;K ;_ I I ^ 66 PAD 6m JE YE xsW 1 82 78' N46 IKO6'W , RAD IT 74125N i X47"39'17 R-10.00" 09'2i'29'N 215fi 5 n 6' ,i °z 67 66• fr39 5862 R®10.00 L 6.5 14 8' M 2486°3933' 5.3J'-. N49.4246 % 13711 I` I N40'19'15'E 149 -v:," i81W w WAS SFE DETAIL N49.2o45Y1 265351 ,� HEREON --- 925 02 � ♦ :., 5,' AVENUE m 664 r � N49 20 S W SaS.Dn' 1 0 � — _— n9'20'4SW A-`I'OTA4' N49'21'37'w }84}2' � � 3 L=860 6-„ 19'0.5 LOT U R 3500'L=691' 1 I 0 0.454 AC. ` ` N.A P. 11IJjVJ,, 83-4111-14 SEE SHEET 15 SHEET S37SHEETS SCALE: 1" = 80' TRACT NO. 58 NUMBERED ED LOTS 17404 LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE,STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LLJ W LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, j HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) EDINCER AVENUE _ I ` 79,. 7V ssN49'10'45 W 2475.3'" ... ., "... 1,49.20WIN 103331 sm 0.525 At I I EDINGR AVENUE LOT KKKKK 9.490 At Sry; 3».,...PA 1435 AC. 407' NUS -2537'. / FG SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP, Itt I' t � 8 rn 42'5446•µ 0� / f- �'i 0y ti O CLRJE CG;;TA RMI1:S :.`eNCT1 9 1 56 ,�I t LLJ W 65 t' VAPoES . J 1 1 1 4 v� 4 / i 1.259 At / 1 h� I LU m 1 LU AI} G �59I � 024 J 41.00 9671 5 - U27i4 T e.0 2U' E 274 4.00' 6.77'i c2e I az9 sr 9 97e-'4� ] r I WUj t� 159.04' 2_13'1 M 1C .J3 927'17 1 P7_ 2311" i'� J vw1'c' VAf<3E5 1 11 I. O � o, a 11 { W 61,,0, 3a' 30' ,. � ! u f I 89 7g 1 � W 3 Eal� � f' E SE Rltr 1 L1H-1 39 9 $a OC 023 N54 f9�1 E 3 66 a _ _ i.2a N40 A10 7 i { I VARiF.'i VARIES 1__35 VL53429' 36 §�' I L 26 N4R 9."c 1600 'y, I � n� I c' 49 I 2�N}8530 Vim_ 5255 y I - N93 _04.yW --am I z 96fi .3 47 I t I $ 24 L- !13915 - �8 499567'E �i Ct2 649'1048"W B: 4'---I 4832 OB 3�Bo 76 L45 Wil 5f85'1, � s <Ot JY �. X13 I Litb N4 318'E 3553 I VALENCIA seas, � N I L,75 N 42�j 3955 � m 1_ I 62 66 6 r m n- -^ 825C2�. 1`66.95 � I i... _ 1418. .77 71 . i sm 0.525 At I I EDINGR AVENUE LOT KKKKK 9.490 At Sry; 3».,...PA 1435 AC. 407' NUS -2537'. / FG SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP, Itt I' t � 8 rn SEE SHEET 15 42'5446•µ 0� / f- �'i 0y ti O CLRJE CG;;TA RMI1:S :.`eNCT1 9 �y LLJ W /v J 235fl 27000 011 1 927'44 6.^0U9L' LUT BB/ 4 / i 1.259 At / Im h� r� 1 14 p9'�13 9100 1 ]'; 022 p Db33 2 28- 7', CZ} ib515 59_50 AI} G �59I � 024 J 41.00 9671 5 - U27i4 T e.0 2U' E 274 4.00' 6.77'i c2e I az9 sr 9 97e-'4� ] r w % A t� 159.04' 2_13'1 M 1C .J3 927'17 1 P7_ 2311" i'� J I I. O F- 11 { W 61,,0, 3a' 30' ,. .. 1 W to I l W W ijs I � J J 1 C 140943 9501 _ -31 J ' SEE SHEET 15 �'i qWV� LABIe O CLRJE CG;;TA RMI1:S :.`eNCT1 9 J 235fl 27000 011 1 927'44 6.^0U9L' .� 22a _p9'1Y goo -10 a 21 - Im 7.527 At 2 1 14 p9'�13 9100 1 ]'; 022 p Db33 2 28- 7', CZ} ib515 59_50 AI} G �59I � 024 J 41.00 9671 5 - U27i4 T e.0 2U' E 274 4.00' 6.77'i c2e I az9 sr 9 97e-'4� ] r t� 159.04' 2_13'1 M 1C .J3 927'17 1 P7_ 2311" i'� J I I. 034 9 D'17 i J 9 2{ C4 151]'2 1]476' l7 - T 163.75 414! 048 2 31t 2I COD 11 { S6 J6' 301 :9 274000 494'1 �., 'fi4I 60 '; Ci61 _ 47'56 9050 20.9E N555036E aAp�2lt 0162 _ 76 ,}' 24950'1 633'? 83 - I0. 0913 80.50' '9 ` ijs ) 2 Ir 5 12" } 1 C 140943 9501 _ -31 Ct2 649'1048"W 17351 m. w N4—'45•IN 265351 5 LOT GGGG r` 14047 At 5f85'1, � s <Ot JY �. 11 I ' VALENCIA seas, � N I n AVENUE i... 70,m.� .. II I SEE SHEET 15 z � 2 U N 2 Z, p;< �� 2z �W�6° LL d F z Q 0z0 -o N 2 p d O W N CllOQN Z O R 0 `C O a p O v Z N N iia � f r. Ow y 02 N N w U N w w wwwww NCC NN tt 133HS 33S "NVA 8 � I � Cl) «o=,tura ts,va." '95L MIA.Kll 31St 1 A I - B.YC.ola6� ,E '. N,Sb,OZa64k i l :.Gv6=.3 C>LZeS=P w w� >wNU o U15 — 3 n W N J J Z Q r z N J Z ? 0 �?�NNONO N ? NNN� N N 2� 2 w Nx20�Jaw oaoa0o�N> n. DO¢222m¢ mw OXMT Q2f-f•~ <0 w O 2 3 t-wXII -<a, max ¢O w K'�-F-1-FIMM N -1 -t -w J 2UN000OOOcS N N t t) J J J J J J 6 S E 9 133HS 338 SHEET 10 OF 37 SHEETS TRACT N O. 17404 SCALE: P = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, 1100 WIF LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE— ee 6lNc--cNGT Nag°16'40"W 60100' _ LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA L45Ld6 Nme16,iU'W 3627 LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, --.SG — Nzs.zv.ar.x j— sbfia.— LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. Ls1 __ Nss°1za'w 32J% LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 «+a wa6°as95e 1 45.04' ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 17404)—LE�RVE eDA sFNCM SEE SHEET 9 cn 61-1'55' �'. 1547 ao' w5.n' C53 )°2fi'09 : ISbJ.p6'� 92.JJ' SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM — - - - STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES, SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY i GPS CONTROL MAP a,a �. LOT DD 1.051 AC. 40 t'S1'3 •L o�qC \ 1.3.)0' !!te�t 30'47 � i Nd2°20'45'04 2653.51''-ry - -_ 206'tr14.05"�� 40137 - m•� Lo Rt7� �{qq VALENCIA �I 9", LOT EEE 0.437 AC. i v 2�ry� 4y V 14.047 Aa ...... .... ,` ASG , /1 Jl (lI /J LOT ZZ eye 7.212 AC. RAP. 4„ 3 7F?AC7' 1\10, 1-1026 a tyLwi B8411-1-14 �/J 6 a r I rI+J I 6,a 30' I ao' Y CO � a r LU 1, - LU 0 w a,a �. LOT DD 1.051 AC. 40 t'S1'3 •L o�qC \ 1.3.)0' !!te�t 30'47 � i Nd2°20'45'04 2653.51''-ry - -_ 206'tr14.05"�� 40137 - m•� Lo Rt7� �{qq VALENCIA �I 9", LOT EEE 0.437 AC. i v 2�ry� 4y V 14.047 Aa ...... .... ,` ASG , /1 Jl (lI /J LOT ZZ eye 7.212 AC. RAP. 4„ 3 7F?AC7' 1\10, 1-1026 a tyLwi B8411-1-14 SHEET 11 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: P = 80' TRACT N O. 17404 58 NUMBERED LOTS XLTA flAB1U5 LENGTH LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, .' LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, NJ `Z '08' 'a, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS, 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE: 627,928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 17404) 4 s �SY 4 N B iY 0 E_Rnp i W58 �� -'__M14 3018° � R 1J ..• .... ` 1 O) IF LJ w x m Iw w m O LJ LJ x cn LJ LJ m SEE SHEET 14 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. Yls. C'�. 3•UZsgbz� \ \ v I- LLI w x w LU w En J � hI F m _ w w r, I SEE SHEET 13 TABLE 1 XLTA flAB1U5 LENGTH CIM .' r AE TABLE r— t,NE L31 eEaainc j 11,77 rE N^e0°Ot'SJ'W i.JI` 92 NJ `Z '08' 'a, t93 NJO°2J'08'E 9t.GC' SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. Yls. C'�. 3•UZsgbz� \ \ v I- LLI w x w LU w En J � hI F m _ w w r, I SEE SHEET 13 SHEET 12 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 7" = F 3 T RAST NO. 17404 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE,' DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, °sr';-.... IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, - STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, � ,!'' - SEE SHEETS 4,6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY \ LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE,''" HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. GPS CONTROL MAP. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE -'^'\ \ RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 11 RE TABU _ ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES r^\ (ALL OF TENTATIVE / A. ]qQ4: TRACT NO. 17404) ' ru yr T,ie DfL' cuavERVE'—A MUS LN—LN—L55 H, HIM- a— Lsa y_Z•n 9aE sF.Do' -32'w >5 " (-'52—N,g•3252W 8743' - C102 1 9'0816 _ 209.IX 33.3tl' L152 11, 9R W_ 3 Po V C103 9°08 a8' 190.00 Jp33' / ? 16 \ \ C252 8- a2 ]55 W t 106.89' pg'S41W 3680' 53 N4B 18 U W .CO' L56 � / \ C253 '21' 755.00 8.a}' 1153 N., 5,*A 33.32' L25a N42'16 59't 49.37' N? FLLI LLI W N y C O S��T y LLI So. w / FCha+�� ' e 'vFt SAO n M51 M30 _ (R, VAR 1E'S 2 I � n Z M37 Ng 4 y _ 1&777 AC. �� =m z / ~Y s fN o� 1 3vI 3u � -R > S M,M37 M r 0 I �� $-[ J W u.l O 0 }' = 4 t zi $ Jco ` S uj uj Iz oa 8 i M51 f U37 Ip a � m DETAIL "C" N.T.S. 7 0.005 AC. _ � -°$ / � g fi 0' SEE DONE 'C' HEREON 30 30'` LOVARIES u10 L e _,WW 3]H 88' �i' tM51 M37 65.W 312 , ` Y48'904'W )9C 1S t - .4'�904'W 36G 8A' t25 MOFFFTT N,9,9D<'N,52, s IAVENUE,1z51 2 1 42 89916 LOT GGGG 1,c,� ACa 69.93 7 T 1 —7- — _. _ _ — �. �- .tt _ .f — _ _ kp o. SEE SHEET 19 SHEET 13 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1° = 80' TRACT 58 NUMBERED LOTS N O. 17404 LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, SEE SHEET 12 RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. \ \ r H W W S N w w U) z \ \ l�6 r�62>� � � �• _ W2 0l� 419. 3 !',-'TAC I' 1\10. 17026 a M,All 88411-14 N.A.P. y; y1 Z %Q v 3p� 15 ,4.032 AC . 61 I -LOT WW L5a ,� 2t.04' 0-t 39 AC. T✓ -- : = 12.67 Nag°i9'04'W JI4 54' ; uN6 na4 tl B[APo. RJ iN _ L5 N 'zJ w ao.on' L60 O lvi W 13 Lt52 N43°7999_' 34.4P' 1153 14 't' ' Li93 k vO'3" .-_,4767 MOFFETT 4ce:a'04"W J5015 P AVENUE 9•,g6<«,52»a" 65 m 699,5 LOT GGGG -- 14.047 AC. m I f � i W 30' 1 t tit it 452,5, o — 569.93 G o x (3p `I 3p 8 0 SEE SHEET 19 0 W W S W W 1n SHEET 14 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: I' = 80' TRACT N O. 17404 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, V/ LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES "Lg3,((+(('�� (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. XRT i Ile C\�±•/ �, RAD '._ I LOT ZZ 7.212 AG SEE SHEET 11 7RACr JVO. 1702- N.A.P. ' ,g� M3s•��3.,v 47 17' 9t4 81 LOT AAA iv " "Id 1316 AC.�j LOT BBB g, -------- ��o AG,� I I -'F9Exk NC FNCiH �N4919 }4W • 25P' L53 Nig` O'30'W ±4. 6' 154 L55 N50'12'2]�W }0,00' i1BS N.i9'4J'3]'E 14].A2 gave *utF OUR'1F OCTA RNNl15 IENGRi — d4n r10'29' 1500.00' 56.93' ' t A ,F t,�+'%yam/� h AVENUE , , V/ 0' 411 i "Lg3,((+(('�� 1! 21111"' �)) i /i I I t A h AVENUE N4G tlC:W,R, 9' 1 — , "Lg3,((+(('�� 1! 21111"' r A C7 VoI �F �.. 30 30• a 35-25 Nei �gltip ��/t 60' is i6 \ SEE SHEET 18 K 133HS 33S i -7- 7 A z 1 0 ,z w 01- er 30\'3 V Nvd ol z oz Qa [tg f= 0 w zo Lu 00,01-0 0 z �5 - Q <<ZXQ MO<WZ O w Ll U., o . A LL - Z. 0 woz ul w w "I Zb ,Z5 6 0 ww LL. Toa � Rl 0 Z CC 0 LLI 0-W.: w LLI < C) - qLq 0 000 101 z 90 '0 a owum LL CO v 101 S 0p N ac 41c 'OV RICO ul z LL o -W FJ 3; 2, s ,as rrF- a > I', SIM Fsa .a uj uj CO Lij LLJ z u 10 , ,,0.9 b9zLOMll`\ V8� I > SI, us 0 1, -)NV 'A L,r >a 3, 4-4 kA CIVO'A > N\ �tr. ugLoo 'NO dzffNNOW 55 jv Lo N Q aex xm Cc, T Dig 2.D t, c z 0 w "Alol 2 :2 97�0-1[ 'Off J-OV&,L z T 9 LU w 16, A Jol 0 0 zs w q< I L 133HS 33S 4t 133HS 33S 9t 133HS 33S Vf LLI W WLLI ,Zb 9fC sif)NIA 10'1 g \ w w n 4 � W Z --.. W O Zr y T� LL < Z> T 4a Z t2 ❑. F- .s 0 D o W o w U ¢ U ¢p Z LL ` N ¢ $ w ~LLI aro vwLL i O \ O ujF z U tea_ rlrZ U)� 'z. r�o�grp ¢ '3 SSE atN �. W u�i O O P o L N Lj j Zf1- ? ` �LOSttl f £ ti D oz a s o N LL, W>j�UZpp Wy xO W m Cl) _ Z�NNON U OZZFOW Lp �6:t -.. L� ...:.' Tr a'3�.: W ZIJN x¢ ¢ (!I F^Quj W tN/ 7• < T I W, OxC7a�OttNr ¢ocn¢¢ 6a �-�, 2" gsoy� yy< Oo l2c) G n' N ¢xmH OLL ¢�Ov> cyE30� Pi d'+ 0�6¢Q7mW Z�W I 9s'SyL=, co9L°tom po U h- u1 Q 4 Q X Q0 x¢ W 4Z FN-FFN-H H!N-wJ� W Ow Www �(U�oOO000Q4 m¢i¢.i. 9Z 133HS 33S 8L 133HS 33S P 91 _0 04 uj U, w0�9 tt W-6 f-- F —1, W.7. uj LLI CO 7'� 6>6 InNIAV AWd T300 0000101 -101 K, L —w- 3.9- 0 A-4 R`6 MCI - 0 X UZ, Is., U0 0 0 z 0 0 04 0 0, < C 0 ) z LLrn F- Lij 0 LLI LLJ z - LLI (CLI0 F- u, -j LU U) m CJ Q j � . s CO W< CO M LLI z D < Lij >0' III j7 � � � � � '' .sr � s> I I N)i)4 101 gap av LCIO 0 7 AAA 101 CIVON HDNVN Nusni —1110 <z ¢ zo <' @ O� 0 � WE "I oxz�zo OyW �ZL� j i <,o z SZZ4! CL w 16 ZZ woo �ww W. 0 Im wo W w 0 p p w to 0 c!) 9z 133HS 33S SHEET 18 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1' = 80' TRACT N O. 1 74®4 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, FFFF LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. ,--LOT MOEVETT AWNUE N49%S LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 8664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 0.157 Ac. 2T _. s9 59' ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTESAND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. „'x y� ',sn� 5s}� M ��0fia - u4a-- SEE SHEETS 4.6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. ges �2 W 6z LOT DDD \ t �c MOEfETT AVENUE 13 1 i aXy DETAIL "E" LOT SS LOT DDDD o.zo7 Ac PARK AVENUE 0,003 At SEE SHEET 13 w m a aor T .- { ®Z " m filo,l SEE SHEET 14- F- �' '.....•.� .:: 1 e 4. o I 999a,W,E29.9 AVENUES w QA) L/ / AT xo — 19_y —4— p fib) W OOi / ,4 i A ._ \N49°WWW 2162.4Y'—�. /VNi �9 \ ,4 �g. �e`w ,6E, �0l G� .9 -t —� 368 0� OTQFFFF C� v �+ 4�a 6T V 0 I—\—SEE \-SEE OETAiE 'E' HEREON W9- ti H w w w I CURVE tA6LE \\ I CU VE D LiA RAOIST tttl6iH i \ �� � '� f56 -BB 56'13 ]000 0& 0' use ..25,22' 2r oa a o3.22 : 13 1 a csa as 1° -o ' _ a` 9C CCbO SCO C88 \`✓" cy 9755 A0. �1 a' C61 11 4J 36" SW GO 023 \� O 62 h �' SCC CGS 1fl2J G 5G 9�Cfi 13 5 1 CC 1�03E' \ \ LOT SS , C 58 3J 3CL OU 23.2 I� `s \ f— U2 3 436' 9000Ci 4.7* \ V (Y' ` ^ w G2.5 1 59 l_ 3Co a0 :L- 'i: R l j. 0107 AQ C2 0 1•ba+1. 7 sato T-_l� l \ r 111 i a� \ N LWE 4.56E � 1•� \ LM BEAR NG 7 CtH \ 19 N 14 w Li 'i81251'k 3.1 ` Lat N'. J°`538' JCCv w N Ra6llm 'J6W' C ' ' \, \ Li24 - .iA'3,�4<�K —94.x0' 1140 N69,3'WE 36.13' -14 N96°42 3 i!- ' L14 L91 N5'2]25 J286' \` L 93 N39°4] 3}"E 14].6'<` 1 „ ° , SYS g5a6fi 5i2 J% :245 NSJ'48 SJ'W 4>ta' \ { I' aAo-AEna� eEALLEb a uc�gT !1 ., D000 f2A.�. F S / ! R ]6689'_ 52 Y'2� rj C�9 R _ 9.4' SEE SHEET 21 J0 wz Z. Q.0 � < Z ZZz ¢,0 MZ x 0 mw.Wm 0 X 0,0= 0 Zr, ddzxo madN2 ozwo. < - � w I z M,L a Zw w w 0 M w owww <WW W.W 4 0 OVON 33NOgwr 0 04 00000 1 0 1 Bf d81m , "N w w WN 3v6G6o nn iol all- LLI O\ O ol -,L�� 0 0000 LL� LL. 0 E St 133HS 33S Lu uj Lu % z 9 LU g F� w F- uj LU ut > > Ll Ds 65 � 10 Z 0 T � AZO N0 z J N, J.66 3 8 < Orx w 0 XX z C� 0 CC x w 0 0 wow 2 0, r M�o Z0,O—q =0 9 H, -7 —__TI I SII I Is I CD isF- 0 uj LLI Lij ui Cl) 0 OVON 33NOgwr 0 04 00000 1 0 1 Bf d81m , "N w w WN 3v6G6o nn iol all- LLI O\ O ol -,L�� 0 0000 LL� LL. 0 E St 133HS 33S >ql; z 9 z4 lz w ut > > Ll Ds 65 � 10 Z 0 T � AZO N0 z N, J.66 3 8 < Orx w 0 XX z C� 0 CC x w 0 0 wow 2 0, r M�o Z0,O—q =0 9 H, 0 OVON 33NOgwr 0 04 00000 1 0 1 Bf d81m , "N w w WN 3v6G6o nn iol all- LLI O\ O ol -,L�� 0 0000 LL� LL. 0 E St 133HS 33S SHEET 20 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1' = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO 17404) TRACT NO. 17404 IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, 3D' 30, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY CPS CONTROL MAP. z4- 0 I, gill Na" tW LU m to LU LU rn W54 - 77.40' -- M51 N - 'WW SEE SHEET 22 IN, M54 SEE SHEET 19 LINE 0z 133HS 33S �, BEN Br Coe 30G. L" 8 0000016, � 0 N 3 L ZJ.s4'N _."----._'_'_.�_' ..•[OD2S:L � nsb i S z I I ao� I z < w J VNa— F 2 O p O QW a O 0`z a0 ZO gz g ��wo� w ° F Z m OQZWO N F 0 W Q Z 2 0 M O Q N Z CLONll < OZWO. a Z m y z 10 W¢ .111. W O° � W w W.¢ww NCL, 9ojE Nom— 69 N2 Sp3�A16 JONi4e r i BPS9=l ....... JV 9gF.f a 7ISY 'gi.9�lP r�bY oGG=� a B ^� .SZ yj,6Cyj .6Z ',n'1 �61 EZ 133HS 33S i CJ \\�..,.g\ ...1.. 0 � 0 N ` LLI z Z `.Q - 4e ',p �4 Z am s Z 6 Wo d c3 Q ¢ vVV00 o PL ZZ V A LL p6P9 q Lu z O 7- �$ ¢1616 V 00 Z¢ W = j\ rr s F- id(_ F- W w W Z O w � G\ W � A I �y GP.IS,ISN z < w J VNa— F 2 O p O QW a O 0`z a0 ZO gz g ��wo� w ° F Z m OQZWO N F 0 W Q Z 2 0 M O Q N Z CLONll < OZWO. a Z m y z 10 W¢ .111. W O° � W w W.¢ww NCL, 9ojE Nom— 69 N2 Sp3�A16 JONi4e r i BPS9=l ....... JV 9gF.f a 7ISY 'gi.9�lP r�bY oGG=� a B ^� .SZ yj,6Cyj .6Z ',n'1 �61 EZ 133HS 33S i N OLLI z N Z � O Z Q �r L, W T 0 �E>,w o=� W o a� U ¢ o U Z U O F 0 N OW Z m r co 2, z Z U �¢ W =� rr = 3 Z N Y O tz W W S W w 0) OZ 133HS 33S / ,or .m .a,..; 9 I y _ ! mow, ivw 5 tF n®PH f- }� m ` JO J/I of s .0 . F- 0 J 3,iC.cc.: M1 �i r m!z 3,:E,LE.'Y6h BUO aA�` - v�clu ��sy Y Y �4 l OZ M 9Q£b,YEN f- }� m ` JO J/I of s Z z a U O F- 0 J 3,iC.cc.: M1 �i r 3,:E,LE.'Y6h Z z a Y �4 l OZ M 9Q£b,YEN r d/) A, O0 9:8 JJ•f t � 2 <.� OP \ O 0 N< q J N U j q`t'y •. �'? .Qa'i "-��-,.`.'SZI pFyJ N'eF > p W y �� y ` 3NNtlI 30 Alq 3 0 313 Zci N J z Z ZOO 1V/V 000maj N T�QQ LL. ... 4X 6C7 ..... // W G Z F H VN-IN-}-I-2O NUmOOOOOOU KS EZ 133HS 33S SHEET 23 OF 37 SHEETS TRACT N O. 17404 SCALE: T o 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA `� ` , ✓� LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, jJ LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNISAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. \ s LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 17 1 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES <,— SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. / �' 6 _ m v5a•I9'c3'w 7 32, �, sz za =299" — 13153' p SEE SHEET8 S 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS / aat�5 oo _ zlass CONTROL MAP. V10 Ra9540C 1=29.0 --.., � V �psiy�.3� 47 9 47 1I N05vv / .', / �O•(\ V / �a poi CV LOT MMM v }tls 25' 'yam T ,E NS �ti 4.106 AD. LLI 1 T LU 04 0 LULLI d a LLI VAS' , hf LU D N5 +� LOT NNN 4 0,442 11 LINE BE_ ' LENGTH 10 9j6 „ -. L69 , 70' ?; 2� ±7i N 6 Sb 69'F .8221' , 20 •�" T �� /b \� '_]5 7.491 A0. �� 'h'` h / T L 7 N42 S3 5 W 2 08 '2V49'W tPA N43 )229 W 9a oD' _ lJ S. 0 9' 18 at vao 5Y3 _ _ 15 .59_ 24, 192 --t-- 1M14 N89 55 6 E 39.,9' 1 : ,_: ., •, ,,: I L95 ti41843E 3S?' 1 LOT PPP-..... / Las N3 b 05'W -_7 "�" I Ej� p e87 N1 E l 0.140 AC. .7 IM d36 418'E ]820 3 24 E 51.29' ) N2] _ E 3 80 L164 4 p EVE -.90 Lt 66 N 14958 5001'— N Li66 N69 5161 22,40' / N ,62 Nao ark E seg — °' N4 515'W Li]8 N2 W 199 09 _ N756SE mud $ 1YYa 1 C I '4 SEE DETAIL •G' ON SHEET 22 U) i = LOT UUUIs UJ " Na9'2229'W 258.58' 1'f L80 flA0 I W {fig 22 t LOT XXX 11x11 2596 A., w os1 ust u5lt Ms1 ust_ ve 9098 AC N853YSi21 ii'= ~� 4 gk i�1 z LOT UUU _ N44• '92 W 516.31' Xu,I.'S vs i1 0.069 AC. e`s>r 21 �E c o. sly x �' S. irk. / 1 `R°� j' - .y°o: J o.sss AC — — — — — _` `�� I�j � 70 N04•22 w'w z414 _.... '^ I \\ I roe•h SCTA 9a-cS LFNcrH c7 '0948 QO I may, I CT9 4"3'1 a 1, 0296' t o ¢ Tt ,!✓ 457 �,S 3 C7] fl*M 9.05' 47.41' c m £ k DETAIL 1 ,52 t j SEE DETAIL 22 45? aD21 Q i i ,q o393 , °A�' 1oz:N ro I' HEREON .559 AC 5 , `i O 1 / 5, S ,Htq, n g I - LOT 55!d 930.00' _ 1993 $ I 23 C RRR I `239 :340.04' 2.2G' '" I o a5 I ca3 e-tz'da 30k •11,11 3 4iasl I __ LOT I L95 '95 i6 I_ c - n u eDE N ).9 iR� 2'5455 340.04 7v 13 l / ?i tr.D Com_ 1_q ��C °gSxyBg, - 27.7 1, I 1i67 S5S I CBS 3'55 3 40M 9214' 1141, #� 9' I �} 451 I 087 2'2122 40004 60 J21 M49 70, L88 "59'21 ,a9N.04 5033' $ " LOT TTT i 99 i •0 4 1.31 {— 1 �s 1 $°9' �, c9D ,52752 9 W IS92' w �� 1 H9,:_ 23 W LOT 45i AIL i �ss 2 ,6� 52 `3a sssz E J49 AC mJ` RRR i T i 3. a" R CI aAll I I -___ I ro94 nSOY {�3 4o W 9.na cf)�; a T 1.112 AG DETA -9a p .d SEE DETAIL ----h_T.s----'I LU 141E crs _ f LJss r il6g�,. J HERE cu" Darn rA��amus L GTc I JT F RAD jn 451 C C)'S6 I (1 T{' CJ6 3 12'51' C 3 43 h57 t 6fi 1 • x_44 <25' 552 t — [L+OT 4,1411 FAJ E' , M49'2913'� 0?.5•�`J`7 Ll2 �N'Z j MA. 1579" 44s 'v ;'i 5�J 3 2 451 cl'F +-, aca3�Ac. _ o9u to6c' M49 /.; ">�p „�_ 3, �p .Q •'� Qq-} Y .. R�2 Nsuzo 'iA51 ix. _19609_ M48 'P 3_ i gip. C'/0 J4 J 5D0 -{A16° A eAo �a s9 09 Sex SEE DETAIL '= 2. w°� Y ¢`° BI VAI .�=63)81 �\ C73 9 93J. 2608 4089 •K• d! SIgET 25 r// fi`O Uf ` 074 [.412'2`," 141 JJ 275tl1 SHEET 24 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: T = 80' TRACT N 0. 17404 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA}�� LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, I! LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 17 \ SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, SEE SHEET 26 ' MONUMENT NOTES, \ � 35' EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES I - .' ,. •, , -' SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS t\ CONTROL MAP. J cq W LLI < , m / -�` ,a /OPS - � A _ co ,� W/ �� � / / /t / t-��� V a Ti / euA 15 3 rn 1F.S `i .., �— ., µ6P9 p(j• i ` I... N 2g :. 70' 24 6.759 AG /1¢,179 W O A4a2r""' co 6�• 61 1 W W co Z I u Oak?9d p) I � I u, N wi70, W x�� 15.T• I It .... . z3,9N Lu 1N T B ARIN9 T 'ENG" —I F" I j// J` C b NI& 355J E. 9.kJ 0 rN 9 4105 '17 56 L±6 N3248 } + 3 6 — L N8359E bx 1103 N60'26'S9'E_ _fy14_ 1104 N83'31'Z4'!_"9' N��' M49 ry gyp, i/ fps 1, ..... TA6LEAl _ CJRTITA RA9. 55 tENOHi c 531'ST 46.w 1064'1 N H2 C66 Z 343' 329564' 59,41' C67 12 2'34 600J' 13.31' � Rqp �� h ��� `. L R<� ♦♦�� q (r�� cse 6 .1'0 +aro' loso' c ave 93' nob oa SEE DETAIL "K' ON SHEET 25—� �- bez 11'12- 34n 04' 19 — 19 V2 1340.2.OJ' �y' Aqp p` r Mt9 ,pf S' 064 - 5" 134064' 170.00"' -12'W55' 'W3.55'23' '34o.04- 77=4{4'E-Sk M49 ry q� 066 Chi 21 2' -0OQO4' 6002' N^i,'g �� � 095 15'14'11' 41 Jd tt GG'' 086 12'48 60 59 W' rx 15 j •3.W %p - '6�ptr A •.cY ,(.:+m ~• �4i y M49 7�, C ,!'. �^p "Y,•"� •�/o^ CSS � 14'12'44"=9.IXi• 10.i J• Y /�.f o� Np " 2'•h µ 0243 1 8'55'28' 1J46.Od" 22P.' /$, � � 49 SEE SHEET 25 SHEET 25 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1' = WO 58 NUMBERED LOTS TRACT N O. 17404 LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE 627.828 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) Y. 5 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS,sI SEE SHEET 26 DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATUM DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, ':5f �pB pg EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES SEE DETAIL 'M' HENEON- SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY LOT !��{�� GPS CONTROL MAP. 0.002 Ac, h5 GPC ry� p6 , p oo 9 C µ15S9 09 !a h IN h W W W W rn 25 31.016 AG. 00 �',o NaJgn ah> a°r o _ _ SEE DETAIL 'K'HERECN I— — N49`O6'_TW 18651' - rye W ti N49LU W.V a� (n z�� \� A sA AFP �'Ai49 30'lop f •1 a �rj �!� 6Rs �-nar•;z�s,H srz, c;, -_ 1p�'�� � 1� ua����'^;' hl4 9 / N46 DETAIL "K° N.Ts' cA L E BEnR.'6 LENGM •y� � C` / X49 � \ X103 nea s ^ •. 3e3a• d%`A "�rye� ._ LOT O Z �2`• \ 0.002 AG ouNs � i/f.,9. 656yg w•a''q �'¢csVp•'is11^yrtp33,5 w �" xz>Ssog3 `zsazl .>z�s`s.. �• I 1 \ \ \pr5\p•'y& 4 0Aa'4 y�• .`°'! i'44—'a•�M'.•ti5 49ta- 2 aTs3a g9Y 59 osM49 M49 / / 11 8 -E8` �..�. DETAIL V' DETAIL SEE SHEET 35 -Nae N.LS NT.& U 133HS 33S £Z 133HS 33S \ w w vt -61 CO w LLI -�' l .ate to a ' SO _ 2+ LL] LLI Y ��( Ws w w 8 46 W N A9 ow w s o ¢ Z O p w d Z U 0066 P, w z t\7 �' wd ¢ / \ O J W Y4g C) F rr�+ yA%"ate° Ir o sr ,at 1 5 d n w LLI LLI Uj LIJ w ( z{ d ySyN tF zg w W — sarocta 3sa4m,or*r'.3 z L:DSY �t'c o R V Sig/ ,598fe - .4-441Z0I` sat 4Poz ys6 z, j9Jt- O 9, -._ ..-_ .i9'666Z _.9m.. " (/ N 3 Z — .4H'OPbl 3„90A�•4SN ° \ y> yy b N�JZO Z F W �. 4 �. \ N JZZ�pO LL.w O 2 Qmm N V Z�.N NON N W 0 K ZCj OLLO < Q 2 0 ¢ N F N= QZ N Q 6 ¢? O2C5 U N> Q.f p W N!C O ¢ NQS .rvQ=4r~aQ4a w ti ho.<FZF N X61 ~QQ >X,Qw Z wp W J O N N N N N N W O U N O W N N Z w¢�r-�Mt-rt-¢-�¢ waozNwawz 0��0000004�� uwm.wa�am 6Z 133HS 33S SHEET 27 OF 37 SHEETS SEE SHEET 7 SCALE: T = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS TRACT NO. 17404 1 LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU. INCLUSIVE,0 > STATE OF CALIFORNIA S2 52' n LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, C.7 In b - LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. z LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007N E ACREAG627,928 ACRES z oG < V. M51 (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) VALENCIA AVENUE M50, '�9�20 "'N 2653.51 LU N92 241 X l—s IAD .9 LOT T C242 5fb 00'.N1 fJ SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM M51j 340 AC N V2II �l �11 11 U-1 T. STATEMEN RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, -"C 62252 LOT o. MONUMENT NOTES EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP, 3k 'A-111 IlTll 'N' K1. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY CPS CONTROL MAP. Ei O I UNE I C.— I LENGTH 0 -#64-2. �-41! E D Ll3 x35°117 31111-41L —W -U—I. v N.A.P.y spy --- ------ -- - LOT T LOT U 0 DETAIL 'N' 58 1,478 AC, m C)i N0 -20'x'. 1—C' P.1„7 CIO! W LOT S 7.466 AQ co Ld U-1 Lu Lu SEE SHEET 26 SHEET 28 OF 37 SHEETS TRACT N Q. 17404 SCALE: 7° c 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6854 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES )))/ (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) ,. SEE SHEET 26 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. i U-1 H». 'o R 6 0 t of a»ai°as^as a=ai<p. e) h LU LU S LU LU U) Na0`39'30'F tr 11'5538' R- q3 w 1x40.23' N52 36 08'E 44.28' Ga ti 35' R m oc L«35.23' 7,387 AL \Trr, a� \ ' R 5.73' "3°•ia�; A P -)• R�4 09•)1. $�$ A C, L ...... W6•q'4.a4' m SEE SHEET 34 co G4W, � T DETAIL "0'' N.T.S. _ _ JFW \ \ 214 CaJ� 6 9 G \ 39 '' 4 ter, s oa 6.749 AC. i W jb-\\ w / INE TAKE W l!N6 BEARING LENGTH lOS N3' 9' 9W 6900'—' A" :/ Ll. _ N3529'39 W 5690' (1J LW N 4'30'21 .55 dr IjJ / l0� ,/A�..t L1.1 •R1 8 /y/ ON N18'0'k5'W 38.66, . l2 9 7 Z* 35 pQ l '� t_za N2 zaYZW i 3a�� �� —2 4,959 zE x366'-1 ary �� - —125 h6i orzs s1 a9' / WR. TABLE I ,g'.��, QIRV ILTA RAp JS LENGTH a/ �Uf' ABLE _ ff�2 LE46iM0. ib 92.96OGfR1 IGO.b9 'zrsl W' .46' _ 9. }'I C196 £30.200• 50.00 '.H].62' eT 9 '199 3]'S 1330. 3].89' C9 3.795' 50. 10+.6' i� p90 13°5081 y, BaO roP 19bd5 C22 50.0 1)Z C2Tl !'5743' 750.00T 6A96` SEE SHEET 35 csso a•z<'A' uuRP s'».a2• 04 U-1 I w S LU LU W �* zgGow�`\h5 Ts ,3 1' 9 �2�045 g6Gh ��g'S :541 d Jn:PA W W 1 Cy, LST P 11.675 AC. ^yn h}Y5`.49 502.BT ul `� py2'1 24p5W 'owl rvw yo� iv f "c �5 g0�� N50 YG'10'W 97 5 b.21'L+3'SS• Prv99.�' 0) "0 1x59951 .f,% � A F (✓ R 2 �4C pR,�W � LU LU \ W'If9 0.SDE�Y>ID'-•. .. �l Kn O 4. �, :OO - pS.�'� Q �b9T. ��� U-1 H». 'o R 6 0 t of a»ai°as^as a=ai<p. e) h LU LU S LU LU U) Na0`39'30'F tr 11'5538' R- q3 w 1x40.23' N52 36 08'E 44.28' Ga ti 35' R m oc L«35.23' 7,387 AL \Trr, a� \ ' R 5.73' "3°•ia�; A P -)• R�4 09•)1. $�$ A C, L ...... W6•q'4.a4' m SEE SHEET 34 co G4W, � T DETAIL "0'' N.T.S. _ _ JFW \ \ 214 CaJ� 6 9 G \ 39 '' 4 ter, s oa 6.749 AC. i W jb-\\ w / INE TAKE W l!N6 BEARING LENGTH lOS N3' 9' 9W 6900'—' A" :/ Ll. _ N3529'39 W 5690' (1J LW N 4'30'21 .55 dr IjJ / l0� ,/A�..t L1.1 •R1 8 /y/ ON N18'0'k5'W 38.66, . l2 9 7 Z* 35 pQ l '� t_za N2 zaYZW i 3a�� �� —2 4,959 zE x366'-1 ary �� - —125 h6i orzs s1 a9' / WR. TABLE I ,g'.��, QIRV ILTA RAp JS LENGTH a/ �Uf' ABLE _ ff�2 LE46iM0. ib 92.96OGfR1 IGO.b9 'zrsl W' .46' _ 9. }'I C196 £30.200• 50.00 '.H].62' eT 9 '199 3]'S 1330. 3].89' C9 3.795' 50. 10+.6' i� p90 13°5081 y, BaO roP 19bd5 C22 50.0 1)Z C2Tl !'5743' 750.00T 6A96` SEE SHEET 35 csso a•z<'A' uuRP s'».a2• 04 U-1 I w S LU LU W SHEET 29 OF 37 SHEETS 68 NUMBERED LOTS TRACT NO. 17404 LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, SEE SHEET 26 LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, } tit (I I LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 77404) UNE TABU: CVaV£ TABLE SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, Ldrs eE aiuc LexaTe ; nuR� eE¢A a.Ac;us :exc� g m �I RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, uos . ' a2,lmg, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES Lf Dr N5f3o3i. 's5.4' c132 3• s.3'_ b,w SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP, ui, ;,g7 .,133 _ 5 g� . 8' u11 KIN' 1 Y cin t - 071 Is 3i SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. 113 n7r47 sa'W 36.2D cies ,t. �s�7T ss_DD. 1 s� 1114 aze ,3.0 - w1 L116 N7'3!'Ol' ciao I _lift N29'I6'19•W i ' C1312°G2'19 X50(' 140. 3' L119 N���E X21. 9' Cf90 � 13'5"�-$QD.Oo'_ 18335' Lf06 N76°t 6' W YI.o4L 1198 N) °:"' •W 19.00 N40°4( WE RAD N 9 9 Sry W 1923.91' RA9 S3 4.545 AG LOT FFFFF 5972] b "IF19 iB 4 W N 9'19'S4•W 432 CB' _ �> '\ a2�� 5) al U co -N 4E„E 3133 �w, LOT 0 s 04 I, ,.e,t AD. 30 30 ~ 5^ W 5 W 57 4.710 AD. lb m d W W },,� 80' 3D. 3Va C LOT P 6 3�o °A3 N85.�e5 W 11.675 AC. ./ � 5 � I '.. ,"; 1.433 AG qe` 3 r ygpsp W/ } Nob'19'$0°W 35.38' R.=i 0.O Shy6 W - N49'19'Stl•W 311 68' C/o n °6 LOT AAAAA 1637 AG N1 .5 v4s°f e W'W 138, 2a -- i cal rfi 1 - N49"960 W 3"0 68' 1... " t 136,1 �. -21.48 s'G Nne<<c,re 35]6 SEE DETAIL 'a HEREON LOT D I J0' 5.966 AG ^ N ;Ao�� 4g�n of 55 h:4a 1 O 'd o 1.858 AD10 . O '.I t 01 D,24 / 64 _ J--2467 Al LOT 4 � - w { AVENUE $ 6 mm t=9713 ( w �1 �Yt ]3 ty40ro1 RT -Y— - C=iif7J2 / 6q µ��40D.04 1 ' e j 7 fn �z LOT PPPP 8.782 AD w x 6, n fp Qp���� r LOT AAAAA <bA ��. 55 ya ;w �4 ! VAAIES LOT ' / DETAIL "P' DETAIL' N.T.S. N.TS. SEE SHEET 31 SEE SHEET 34 SHEET 30 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: TRACT NO. 17404 BERED LOTS -.--. -.48227' LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, 0.870 AG LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, 267.33' k33'SJt - Na9%9'50•'8 IfiS96' LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS, 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 ACREAGE: 627,928 ACRES v (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) LOT BBBBB SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, A°i^3Y'at' y EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. Q a SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. -07.83' SEE SHEETS 4,6AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. X35°59'33"W 1240 A0 M51 N49°1954w 1922.91'RAO 9-N u" LOT EEEEE - o NAS -.--. -.48227' R 0.870 AG - 3o 3G ts69`q -.,., II31J' (�(� _ .. m ,S; LOT C(�VCCC Q527 AC ��� - ""NS&°44'QiW 3148• LU .'N 46' X39°22'S2•W Rao 267.33' k33'SJt - Na9%9'50•'8 IfiS96' 8 $ 1250 X 2W (r,2,w1' E).6r 51 0.220 AC v RAO, w LOT BBBBB J VARIES" A°i^3Y'at' y 0.121 AC, "...._. - Q a -07.83' 52 1240 A0 M51 � m M6i n 46• M61 .. - X07°2U1e•w 36.32• � ml�+� a� C s6 Gj3 t SEE NAIL •P` ON SHEET 29 M51 - 3o 3G ts69`q -.,., II31J' (�(� _ .. m ,S; LOT C(�VCCC Q527 AC LU 6 �. 267.33' k33'SJt - Na9%9'50•'8 IfiS96' 30 1250 5 32u L 3> 2W (r,2,w1' E).6r 51 0.220 AC v RAO, w LOT BBBBB J VARIES" A°i^3Y'at' y 0.121 AC, "...._. - -07.83' Hti'2 ,ie12 A V O M6i ' M61 L � g N} � Sa3Ar " Q zla ✓,� y ol 1 t 64' 9% M810 At, 892411' 53 3.848 AC. [7<iSnm 54 0.013 A^, N49.19'.'A 12X1, 23' sort' " 263 N�4 WW 35.35 �•� � SEE NAIL •P` ON SHEET 29 N W LU 30 W LU M51 M81 O) ,y7 � s8h C,' s t SEE NAIL •P` ON SHEET 29 M51 `,.,✓ M51 M81 � s8h C,' s 6933 .- Hti'2 ,ie12 A V M61 g N} � Sa3Ar " y 0a {�l t - Tz •p dC� R` h a, L1yz IWWWW A-'909 ., 65 - �.•""F ,` X23 ------C 55221 _ NESEAH L133 _ + 6p5 Q� J J' IJHE G l..Nciti NSG 9 w 1 18510' �u'p451 p. i VV r\ / Lfi9 7E 123.40' 021 X40 W101 363' 'ry 10 8 -- A,.ye 41`32• AG � ,,, Li 3 X49 JP 5f` W 14 .- 2�1 Q4•'1(� CQ i i Lue N391Gse =� 1 & ` dui `0 T i127 NZS P'18•E 38.66' < n > J_ —TAHLE _128 X39 031•E 6G.W' ` CIRIF. Oi 'A RADIUS . NGTH ON 94`.•E 36.66' 2-� 4' `/ -_'�' J I C.30 2555'58' -GW 113.15 _ LM 113.1 21723" 374360 199,72' L131 0134 9•.38'19' ]793b0' §i.B9' Ci3'< 4391 3;•E 4_994, N04a 1G"W 35.97' YD6"84'20•A 37.ag' Y 4135 •, 7' 9• 3759b ' 15636' L133 # 49' 9'W i 4200' 10.38' Lia] .10' N38°t9_'17E _ 121.0t T ... I / C137 14'0313• 59.00'_ 14.33' 039 C'M 14.6314" 58. W 19.33' Li P,1 N65.15'26•E 37.48'_ X66.56'37"w '3.8 14 JTI,e 42.W' 1939, 1192 N28.464YE 73.27 C126 1209' 135404 92.05' ,165 CM 2.10'13' '354.04' St'eg' 1i96 N]5.WWA MW 7.`i 15"4a•w 30M, SEE SHEET 31 cn1 r19'1s' 1354.04' M7W Lzso X50.99' 9•w 96.23__, 0 C}' o V N 0 z Z � Q � Z d w. w Z� 0 d z¢ Z � N ,.,� O W O U J a" 0 Q U � zZ U ��QO H W Z O F- Y J Q U z d W x� rw 2 yn Ii.il � h Z F— } 0 ¢ M W W W 2 W W U 33S 6? 133HS dj ;pby W ��f a a a m i uj 11 I ..� i l •00 ti ' m £ OL .�j W co \ t F- 0 i s N � 8 � S�F�D oC ,Ot i e C-immn \\JAY — W ar zap:— W w > D N Z O d > 9aT b W J _ > = o 2 ¢ y ¢ Z o: y y vJ J Z ti J J Z ' Z 2. O W W w N O Z p m...... f ` ¢� f0 .U12 N U— N N fry U?�NNO(O U 0 C}' o V N 0 z Z � Q � Z d w. w Z� 0 d z¢ Z � N ,.,� O W O U J a" 0 Q U � zZ U ��QO H W Z O F- Y J Q U z d W x� rw 2 yn Ii.il � h Z F— } 0 ¢ M W W W 2 W W U 33S b£ 133HS 33S I- dj ;pby W ��f a a a m i uj 11 I ..� i l •00 ti ' m £ OL .�j W co F- 0 i s N ,0 9 S�F�D oC ,Ot i h 2 4 — W ar zap:— W w > D N Z O d > 9aT b W J _ > = o 2 ¢ y ¢ Z o: y y vJ J Z ti J J Z ' Z 2. O W W w N O Z p m...... f ` ¢� f0 .U12 N U— N N fry U?�NNO(O U z N N x Q W S 6 F.z^v 3 t9 uWj U !¢- n O O¢ 2 m t= p Q 5 O F . i\'bra 9ry i� J, u, I `'- 2N Iqt �� s>.ss.2r�p... �S'V�yp Mo�-wO Wo va\pp2z st ¢'•- �.,.. ZNzNq w2 /QF��QJ xfi N0c)Ow2 + w¢Zw2O own a2 cOJ b£ 133HS 33S I- dj ;pby W ��f a a a m i uj 2 I � m W W co t ,09 I oc x Cl) M ry I- r W X W W F- 0 i ry N ,0 9 co oC ,Ot i e;raa.�Mot — W ar zap:— W W ul ,6l9 LLa 1 I ,6 e 3.SO, , ,, SHEET 32 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1° = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE 827.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. kE T i ':INE 6EAA:NG LQN- 1139 Not'VVE 06 F.7' LZte Ne4452YE V97 :220 8 132W 7 63_ `221 M6 2i43'.L.. i 1 222 N34 410 W 13 1223 L11A 7 1 43'w 14.2T c225 N5 54TE g60J' 1226 -'ll WE -SS' :Zll N 6'2 '40'W 34.93- 79,7U 4. -7970' 1235 N67 39 kt'E ]000' L239'd9 4414'W .00 1.zao N6.. L^_w aa.00' L241 M1 °15' I .63 j W z O 452- , vavLyM' TRACT NO. 17404 IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6664 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 (aG R� 3P K d Vr 0.029 AC SHEET 31 1 i239Y..:kt�J3 s 4qa w 3 .49}q6 s I — 452 Ig N I 11 -LOT H mss, N ! 3030'E 1088.25. LaT xxxx 8.374 AG 0.029 AC. _57720'— - b - ---- __ N87-39'301 W—' t m sr \ 053 ,1' NO 48C2W >.o N47 zaa,'W d^ID 0101 � 21.21' � d >s' (aG .. SEE SHEET 31 1 i239Y..:kt�J3 RAG Noe w� / u9' � I — 452 11 N ! 3030'E 1088.25. LaT xxxx 8.374 AG ,`czza- _57720'— - b - ---- __ N87-39'301 W—' t m sr \ 053 ,1' NO 48C2W >.o N47 zaa,'W d^ID 0101 21.21' N 7413'p ' F 30' 30' 30 30' e DTAI EL "S" 45 — N.T.s SEE SHEET 37 1.323 AC. ',.. g`NII N 46 ` 1.552 AC. 0 y N47.2A'.'/YW 21.21' N42'39'30`E 21 21 ( g 44 � ?' N8I°3i JO'E 33800' ` _ `_ '-'7N4&-A3' L 74' ,� LOT xxxx .37+AC 393U'E 96305 0_ 4.638Nfi ' r __ Ne7°3e'3a'e 3.w.aa -�- 1 nn2°S9 a E 111 Na7•zo� 0'W 2i ti 6 0' 6.0 30.,',,,, 36 30' 30 M M N n 43 - ai y 3.018 AC. X o o z x LLI I � C 01• o„ 0 o \ � 4500 2SB 00 4509 ; ?M� 10 �3Q.p 5 ala R W30 P7 �n N9]•59- 10 E 4 B 00 ]000 36 1 0_ A„>S Lb � N8J 1930E 92i'i !' v Nf��'SB F J g0 LOT YYYY 2.15o Ac. R'ID p;f 4G t'tbfi13 /`�� ;� h8) ' N423B'kl"E 21.9' N4T20'30°W 2121 I ti D' l 6,, 0. d 30' 30' F 30• ',,' 30' iXn lo. LOT I +.res ac. } 0026 AG 36 fix) 4 +.107 AC. X X z Cq�w O gip( *as d��x V arx'1e } � n=a°3n 16' ty r, N s tab I N s�.00 aofSEE DE'AR'S KK. \ N00 5 Ptl E 63.0`,-�i 80' l'�� *:.k'f1548'E 6329' 37 oz. lA I3B 130 k R -h 14o F )SL W � 1 i239Y..:kt�J3 Noe w� / u9' � � 0 Rey �' 24 A N11t32 1903-. 36 6.4C mom. C m __ ._ 053 ,1' NO 48C2W It LOT SSSS DTAI EL "S" — N.T.s SEE SHEET 37 SHEET 33 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1" = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE, 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORA STATE OF CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. RORY S. WILLIAMS, L.S. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUG SEE SHEET 31 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 6 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP. NGE ve TM e I cc_avE �rua—NAuus �NCTtI - y 9oom' alj WOOL+194,5Y. #AN2' 96.53'7UST, 2007 a3°so'w_ 2w o1+ 127.sz_ 019) 13"t ]'0.5` 2.j9j 4 L69°s' C19a W42'55! 55' 250 `] _ LINE TABLE c199 i] -]GL` 32 7�sizy _ IJ4E T BEARWG !E'N61X C2W 2-19" 10 L208 N6{39'30'E '_207 NH7°39'30°E 5p.00_ 0202 y_15`CC'(W` 250.07' 69.Ftj ;.212 " 9"W' 19.12' 0203 e°J '13" 00'i 28.14" t21S �'3g°04'i0°C 3(1.12' 0204 i 9.24'47` 240.00'1 41.07' .fir. LZ15^ 1719 10517' o2oe a o ra; 2sa 3 9f°, 0206 q,}p0` L2I_"E 21]2' , 1234 NB]S9'30'E 3c100' (,1213 90 W'00' _ c s912'_ 0222 , d'fii Yll1.Oc 0227 .7.'.0103' 800:¢Y;_91�8* _°. --- n N2]'39'30"E 1988.25 n LUT XXXX N87 39'h'G 446.05' / ! N42°39.360 <l.i1' N47°1030W 9.8.] 6 0' 30' r 1 81— / / j •� 30 30 I � 47 X,Fi 3.715 Ac. } X o l 54 30 3(i' \ �� .,_Nu•ze'ao"a z1.^rr NM12.03o'a 2121 LOT XXXX937+AC. .� 3a1.Y3' 03 3 ' 69LLJ � I LU LOT F X 42 A 0:986 AC, & 1 29W AC. I w 02 - hI1J30'W 2=21 6=4.360 574y L-728 N7 39 JOE 2 4zsee o9 a �e9ar LOT XXXX cz �' Ntl)`39'30'E 324.47' 4374 AC 5§.10 ,46"6000" RAG i �t' 60 7;8, N51g 3 �� 7 V 30 3t7' 6.1G'RAO 138 'r 38`.1. i L R 139. L�548 � K I M'12 X-'3GY.'i2 p R 0 A tg30'; z 8 1 n RAp PRC :�� W m 37 { _ 5,695 AC. •`� 9, } i 1 50 38 .B8 f t. �>< N33r2"w ,207 _2W >< >< R _ XI } ,5' �-- �gAp AG. Y.,. \ i ONl}°bpi 85 '. 9 8 t J 1 N s m W W N67 9'30 E 6- I LU LU S SEE SHEET 36 SHEET 34 OF 37 SHEETS SCALE: 1' = 80' 58 NUMBERED LOTS LOTS A THROUGH Z, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AA THROUGH ZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAA THROUGH UUU, INCLUSIVE, LOTS XXX THROUGH ZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAA THROUGH ZZZZ, INCLUSIVE, LOTS AAAAA THROUGH 00000, INCLUSIVE ACREAGE: 627.928 ACRES (ALL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17404) TRACT NO. 17404 IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. RORY S. WILLIAMS, LS. 6654 DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST, 2007 SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS. DATUM STATEMENT, RECORD MAP AND DATA NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND NOTES. SEE SHEET 3 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP. SEE SHEETS 4, 5 AND 6 FOR BOUNDARY GPS CONTROL MAP, SEE SHEET 31 128'3890 E • RhD N9 39'30'E 35 .26 R-<x'�' = R 000 ssl R 89 M1011 'Oif 30 30 � I a j s c �„$ ze;�• _ 30 30 X90. SEE SHEET 29 czar • s•z<a1` zsoos_ +a.or ��, A \ C2as baa -aa- zw.oa ie>xi' V 6201 ' 109'00'00' Lao' 122 101;1' C2U�90°00'00' 44.0x' 69.' � ��b \ � \ C22J Z•01'03' 909 CO' 9].98' UNE TABLE 8 A. hC FLEwf Jp U15 154302 E .55 5 eun1 Ns1.39'waB y app 1 ?B LZIC t-N4z'41 zz-w ss OD' '133"W 3B Oa' 1211 +`...,� �zs xTJsw. 'm_ I n�' 2� •�''p-' \ _1216 _. m WE 1.12 NieP ��� L2]Z k+5550 21.9' 2A.L I A 9G s i 11 yo n 6.720 40AC { LOT E �x�� s. N5r393a-e Y �' 6.560 A0. N9J•3a'�o s a f � �'k a � •Fw 41 h' 4 i< 1033 AC. X m 55. O m+ P ,b ti 36 3o-, t ��� CiG3S �2N4 _ N92030'W i71.�:�5' B,T. t? 5 _97 0202 ,o czo c p� 7 6' 39 ><, 38 3.523 AE R tD cuR�c rcpt_ `—CllF R`F' DEtTA_i�—RADWS LENCM 1 Ct21 9.68'09' 1 5 .00' 21- J' i 0126 13°35'119' j)604 22,64' i azs P2262- m30.D9' 51.21' (.. CIB1 6'5449' B.'�.00' 56.53' 6=2`ZT4fi' 0193 6°J3't7 .00 6 b0' Noa•�}3^^ � GId4 �_ TV 000.00 3439' _ CI95 else 5'06'5w %0.00' 7i,41' -- i n ci91 1'5451` aya a' W33'35- bga,na: 79z' J G190 '3505 %IC a 19335' V1351, BJG 00 _ 9400' _ 019 )0655 P.00 9935' 19] 69'.,3 T 0 966' 0194 1,195 7., 1 02]'62 800.00 6.46` LOT WWWW AC, 0196 4J°pa'00-E50.00" i9]. ' C 8 4'-k .00- 101.80' g5 199.42 czol ; 11'.157 3:i6Ac � 11.56' 0202 _� cza3 16'00`00' ' SEE SHEET 29 czar • s•z<a1` zsoos_ +a.or ��, A \ C2as baa -aa- zw.oa ie>xi' V 6201 ' 109'00'00' Lao' 122 101;1' C2U�90°00'00' 44.0x' 69.' � ��b \ � \ C22J Z•01'03' 909 CO' 9].98' UNE TABLE 8 A. hC FLEwf Jp U15 154302 E .55 5 eun1 Ns1.39'waB y app 1 ?B LZIC t-N4z'41 zz-w ss OD' '133"W 3B Oa' 1211 +`...,� �zs xTJsw. 'm_ I n�' 2� •�''p-' \ _1216 _. m WE 1.12 NieP ��� L2]Z k+5550 21.9' 2A.L I A 9G s i 11 yo n 6.720 40AC { LOT E �x�� s. N5r393a-e Y �' 6.560 A0. N9J•3a'�o s a f � �'k a � •Fw 41 h' 4 i< 1033 AC. X m 55. O m+ P ,b ti 36 3o-, t ��� CiG3S �2N4 _ N92030'W i71.�:�5' B,T. t? 5 _97 0202 ,o czo c p� 7 6' 39 ><, 38 3.523 AE R SEE SHEET 36 tD t �n ~" 1201 I: r20 CB � 6=2`ZT4fi' —��N�,1� Noa•�}3^^ � � / 297 54' n SEE SHEET 36 SEE SHEET 35 i 6=2`ZT4fi' Ay � 59 / / 297 54' E x1213 a -� LOT WWWW AC, SEE SHEET 35 8 1 41 21�� zzfa� zlziga i� N W W /, jj�,�S W W ~Z2� i.zo.eb.esrin-- a 9Z 133HS 33S tr 8i8888k 8'58888888881888888 � I ' n S r $ S $ rt }9 _ Gv11 ��•\« � r Q tl f 4ryy4t nJ G" JJJ CYtl ti JN G* n ,moi pnYt' /aa PRC 'x'10 L°12INWM U N Rv oL ew -- ct es es gpaeN ,R ObW 3nN3n 00W a W G '- 1 ui = yy } > N U O W n J = W��JZO vJ J22 p Z U V Z� N N O N U W ?N7NNx Q2 m O ¢ 0 ¢ S b D x r r mW M�mxr¢Q-ae{(� f-ui�6 d<x GO W J zq�mpo NNW W¢zr r rrt-r¢� O N 22SS2200Sg n ,moi U N C) Oo OZ 0 N 00W a W G \ Sa C1 < O w F- W OZ ZONp _ 05 b 65 9ZC - > i• O ¢ z ¢ _ Qi Z tai V �,Ada nea =, � \` S • Z W 0 w L \ 0�LL 0~W U — < a a7 ay g a ', C S Q W W qOW H W Z OwOw¢ O �g�ag / (/L, V O w 6 wta-Zrii� znwwz U =_a Q Z < O� Q W w o" W W W N <- w c `w w m o ££ 133HS 33S W S ~ 3 rr Z y Z I- -------_JQ e �¢¢ a Cl) L� � F- ,.______ _.aroas x.pf,cz.zcN _—.__._...__ . '• 1 ui = yy } > N U O W n J = W��JZO vJ J22 p Z U V Z� N N O N U W ?N7NNx Q2 m O ¢ 0 ¢ S b D x r r mW M�mxr¢Q-ae{(� f-ui�6 d<x GO W J zq�mpo NNW W¢zr r rrt-r¢� O N 22SS2200Sg KH n ,moi co C) Oo W co �I—_ --- 9SB-_ �M,C} afM �lT_.---M.Z450S0 o� _ M: S �aaa 1e, _ ap C8f OZ ZONp _ 05 b 65 9ZC - inN3nH V �,Ada nea =, ZQ Qp g L ... ma = Z 0 0 —09. v_100 Z Z CJS �-�6 \ 9f 13SW .f L liyl'A W W qOW Q¢�Zx OwOw¢ O �g�ag / wta-Zrii� znwwz O� Q W w o" W W W N <- w c `w w m o ££ 133HS 33S 9£ 133HS 33S KH n ,moi C) ce v Q of S30A 3 88$888$RBS" I 9£ 133HS 33S . I co f Lf S4Yt--N OZ.ZON F— W ! W Z Q : rja ,or Ar W W B 1 8 w ¢t -co Z O N CO n 7 ujm m ..p. LaNJ j = Z F Z Z aQ = IL -LI --- - u�16 XO T- BLt'- ,80i8f n ! [I£pZ,ZQN a GD SS b 9Zf ,6S .0 (ZJ F W ziJj NNx�K Z_ f11FOWm 3nNInb ; S e MVV s'taa M_,.zc so ecx 9 — ¢Omtt� cuazM�T $ 't'j Kf% ay0S4 S'P G r e ) 4$ 2WWxw ,Bt'9 O O W 4ZIm-}m-Fm-Fm-Hl-K-) ^gx zry�!I-Yq 9415 ww¢wuw w w o m no3a3N n.'tnl� 335"' LE 133HS 33S 1H l LLI Z = 4), y To<Z> F Z ¢ I crc m � W° O' lL ¢ ~ M U Q O q0 (h Z wl vo Z Z' 0s l x. O '13 m S aQ J CIJ z<1 W V <71 W Z W , a rr 3 7 Y Q t i aYE J2RE' S30A 3 88$888$RBS" g es d: ry�x� .rya °z � so RT/4:>< f Lf S4Yt--N OZ.ZON Z Q rja 1 0 m~z O V 1 8 w ¢t -co Z O N CO n 7 ujm m ..p. LaNJ j = Z F Z Z aQ = IL -LI , L.B4 w(i}JJ Q u�16 XO .8v NO J ZZ Z NO 0'ZK O Z O . 98 .0 (ZJ F W ziJj NNx�K Z_ f11FOWm 1 / 8a 2 gym, tS�S�C3 C�(77¢ w m lb06fA W W W OxL7DJ06:m> www Omx x��cNi )'" ¢Omtt� cuazM�T $ 't'j O u o: o:xr r ¢mz wx¢r¢ QQ w ¢ (-u�F-w —,--r g es d: ry�x� .rya °z � so W W S RT/4:>< f Lf S4Yt--N OZ.ZON Z Q rja 1 0 m~z O V 1 8 w ¢t -co Z O N CO n 7 ujm O w m ..p. LaNJ j = Z F Z Z aQ = IL -LI , L.B4 w(i}JJ Q u�16 XO .8v NO J ZZ Z NO 0'ZK O Z O . 98 .0 (ZJ F W ziJj NNx�K Z_ f11FOWm 1 / 8a 2 gym, tS�S�C3 C�(77¢ w m lb06fA W W W OxL7DJ06:m> www Omx x��cNi )'" ¢Omtt� cuazM�T $ 't'j O u o: o:xr r ¢mz wx¢r¢ QQ w ¢ (-u�F-w —,--r r e ) Haj Q<QX QQw O 2WWxw O W 4ZIm-}m-Fm-Fm-Hl-K-) 9 w m m wsw W w zry�!I-Yq x�m000000o VJ m m J J J J J J Q g ww¢wuw w w o m LE 133HS 33S W W S NI1sni ,77 .t58LFaZ 8988!=y 8NJ %9 p S8L0£x� .LS.St.Ot--q N.9Zry M 4l F PN l� j 10 d Q 0 < O wO 0 o O QOn �° o� M F— U- "¢mvi < � F \ v r '�\ V ` N Lu a;a f Ln U �Z W 2 _J rr uj 1 Z � y F— 0 �i z a ,rc 9saz� 3.LI,ef.o4N 1 OO CS z 3,C..Bf NEN ; CI) X M R b C Z(K a,Bp (itr,0§N ,fti HBI 3,60,04�AhN - � a� ,I v - v N x y h ry inN3AV r)NOKSWNd .oll NLLSIll !0 .LLp tlNtl tl1NY5 !0 Atp -.I_ -- 'y 3nN3Ab 111N CID w � J Q w yp:90§1'N � UO / y5w§tb �a91 W 4 Z a u!y Lauf> $ OW zZ as W iqy J= 2 : W O uj ZO ?�00-0 O Z VS W mwy m VJJZ2N0 WO,zm OZOLO LL O' N O W ZN�NNS � N �(7000mOzV> a F- OQ�w�Q r 'WFC'Q W tu- Lii ru QQq F 2 Q Q 6 x Q LL W O S Q W 2 2 oo <ZFm- Fid-F�-FFm-Q W 0� W W wwQWW NN.0000004s m ¢ W 4 ,rc 9saz� 3.LI,ef.o4N 1 OO CS z 3,C..Bf NEN ; CI) X M R b C Z(K a,Bp (itr,0§N ,fti HBI 3,60,04�AhN - � a� ,I v - v N x y h ry inN3AV r)NOKSWNd .oll NLLSIll !0 .LLp tlNtl tl1NY5 !0 Atp -.I_ -- 'y 3nN3Ab 111N CID ATTACHMENT C City Council Resolution No. 11-60 fi RESOLUTION NO, 11-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17404 TO SUBDIVIDE A 627.9 -ACRE SITE INTO 58 NUMBERED LOTS AND 119 LETTERED LOTS LOCATED WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS B, D, AND A PORTION OF G (PLANNING AREAS 7, 8, 13-15) OF THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY BOUNDED BY EDINGER AVENUE TO THE NORTH, JAMBOREE ROAD TO THE EAST, BARRANCA PARKWAY TO THE SOUTH, AND ARMSTRONG ROAD TO THE WEST FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES ONLY The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Tentative Tract Map No. 17404 was initiated by the City of Tustin to subdivide a 627.9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes. The site is generally bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Armstrong Road to the west; B. That the proposed Tentative Tract Map 17404 is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan land use designation of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan which designates the project sites (Planning Areas 7, 8, 13- 15) as Village Services, Community Core, and Residential Core which provides for future development of offices, retail and service commercial, businesses, residences, and parks; C. That a public hearing was duly called, 2011, by the Planning Commission Resolution No. 4177 recommending Tract Map 17404; noticed, and held for said map on July 26, and the Planning Commission adopted that the City Council approve Tentative D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said map on September 6, 2011, by the City Council; E. That the map would be in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Tustin City Code Section 9323 (Subdivision Code); F. That the City Engineer has examined the Tentative Tract Map and found it to be substantially in conformance with all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and City Subdivision Code. Resolution 11-60 Page 1 of 34 G. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEISIEIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR and its Addendum is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The FEIS/FEIR and its Addendum considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin; and, H. That the proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development rights are associated with approval of this conveyance map. An Environmental Analysis Checklist has been prepared, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and concluded that the proposed project does not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantial changes, or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEISIEIR and Addendum. 11. The City Council hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 17404 for the subdivision of an approximately 627.9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes only. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 6 th day of September, 2011. ATTEST: PAMB A STOKER, City Clerk Resolution 11 -60 Page 2 of 34 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE )SS CITY OF TUSTIN 1, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 11-60 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 61" day of September, 2011, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA 8TO KE R, City Clerk Resolution 11-60 Page 3 of 34 Amante, Nielsen, Gomez, Murray, (4) None (0) None (0) Gavello (1) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 51-3-3100 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST For Projects With Previously Certified/Approved Environmental Documents: Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin This checklist and the following evaluation of environmental impacts takes into consideration the preparation of an environmental document prepared at an earlier stage of the proposed project. The checklist and evaluation evaluate the adequacy of the earlier document pursuant to Section 15162 and 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. A. BACKGROUND Project Title(s): Tentative Tract Map 17404 (Conveyance and Financing purposes) Lead Agency: City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 927$0 �;; f��sx-K i N Lead Agency Contact Person: Justina Willkom Phone: (714) 573-3115 Project Location: Neighborhoods B, D, and G of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 General Plan Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Toning Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (SP -I Specific: Plan), Neighborhoods B, D, G Project Description: Tentative Tract Map 17404, a subdivision of a 627.9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for conveyance and financing purposes only. Surrounding Uses: North: Edinger Avenue /commercial, business parks, and commuter rail station East: Jamboree Road & Peters Canyon Channel and Tustin Ranch Road & the District Shopping Center South: Barranca ParkwaylComrnereial and Business Parks West: Future Armstrong Road/vacant land/OC Sheriffs Academy/Columbus Square Residential Development Academy/Columt Resolution 11-60 Page 4 of 34 E Previous Environmental Documentation: Program Final Frivironmental Impact Statement/linvironmental Impact Report (Program FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin (State Clearinghouse 494071005) certified by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001 and its Addendum approved by the City, Council on April 3, 2006. B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below, Ol.and Use and Planning MPopulation and Housing MGeology and Soils MHydrology and Water Quality MAir Quality MTransportation & Circulation MBiological Resources ['Mineral Resources ElAgricultural Resources C. DETERMINATION: ❑Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑Noise OPublic Services ❑Utilities and Service Systems OAcsthetics ElCultural Resources DRecreation OMandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ 1 find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, El I find that although the proposed project could have a significant eftect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I Find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 1 Find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the 0- proposed project. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects I ) have been analyzed Resolution 11-60 Page 5 of 34 adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have 1Aem been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigati;onures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Preparer: Date: J j na na Wilikorn, Principal Planner Date Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS See Attachment A attached to this Checklist OWN on LIM Resolution 11-60 Page 6 of 34 c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? EVALUATION {)F ENVIR©NMENTAG IMPACTS 17 quality of the site and its surroundings? f NON,', d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which criteria established by the applicable air quality management ?{' F-1 (� or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the II AGRICULTURE RE,S+p RC S: In determining No Substantia! whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant New afore Change From a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable I. AESTHETICS -Would the project: Significant Impact Severe Impactr Previous Anulyvis Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not to an existing or projected air quality violation? a) Conven Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps mss; $tea prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring within a state scenic highway? Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 17 quality of the site and its surroundings? (-1 d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which criteria established by the applicable air quality management would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? F-1 (� or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the II AGRICULTURE RE,S+p RC S: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assesamenr air quality plan? Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: to an existing or projected air quality violation? a) Conven Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps mss; $tea prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air agricultural use.' quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? F-1 17 Ill. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Resolution 11-60 Page 7 of 34 IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife uxridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites". e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: -Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? V11 „GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No SubstantialON ❑ New More Change From .Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Analysis _ ❑gwtMR ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑gwtMR Q �z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Resolution 11-60 Page 8 of 34 Vtl. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOI S MATERIALS: Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the No Substantial New More Change From ❑ Significant Severe Previous i} Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the Impact Impacts .4nalysis accident conditions involving the release of hazardous most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map materials into the environment? ❑ issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other c} Emit hazardous emissions or handlc hazardous or acutely substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ❑ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ii) Strung seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government iii} Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b} Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftopsoit? c} Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse'? ❑ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code ( 1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? ❑ ❑ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [� ❑ Vtl. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOI S MATERIALS: Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ❑ ❑ c} Emit hazardous emissions or handlc hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ❑ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (� ❑ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workiR iA thet:u�a — — ❑ ❑ Resolution1--60 Page 9 of 34 I g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation pIan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site eam or area, including through the alteration of the course of a MEstream or river. in a manner which would result in substantial VM erosion or siltation on- or otT-sire? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially derzrade water quality? g) Place housing, within a l 00 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Floud Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a I M -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? r j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Substantial New Afore Change From tis NINE Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Anahsis ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A €- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D ❑ RON ❑ ❑ 9 Resolution 11-60 Page 10 of 34 ran d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient I noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing No substantial New ,blare Change From b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or Significant Impact ,Severe Impucts Previous Analysis where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project public airport or public use airport, would the project expose (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, people residing or working in the project arca to excessive local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the noise levels? 7 purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? D would the project expose people residing or working in the c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or project area to excess noise levels'' Cl natural community conservation plan? 0 XIt POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: X. MINERAL RESOURCES— Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of resource that would be of value to the region and the residents roads or other infrasrmcture)? Q of the state? ❑ ❑ b) Result in the loss of availability of locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan'? El 0 -NLAQ- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (3 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project arca to excessive noise levels? 7 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excess noise levels'' Cl XIt POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrasrmcture)? Q b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsew esolution 11-60 Cl Page 11 of 34 L Li 0 XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire }protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? MM XIV. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV.TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC -Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highuays? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.' d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g,, farm equipment):' e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ff Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ 0 No Substantial ❑ New More Change From Z Significant Severe Prcn,ious t` Impact Impacts Anal) srs c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the 11-6a construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ❑ XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire }protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? MM XIV. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV.TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC -Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highuays? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.' d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g,, farm equipment):' e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ff Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Z 13❑ ❑ Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ate RI M ❑ ❑ Z ❑ ❑ ❑RaMution 11-6a Page 12 of 34 ate RI M g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND -SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVIL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, Substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Resolution 11-60 Page 13 of 34 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No Substantial New ,More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts 4nrelvsie ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ __._ ❑ ❑ 20 RN 00011 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP I7404 FOR CONVEYANCE PURPOSES NEIGHBORHOODS B, D, AND C OF MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN Resolution 11-60 Page 14 of 34 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION A Final Joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the FISiFIR was prepared by the City of Tustin and the Department of the Navy (DoN) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National 1=nvironmental Policy (NEPA). The FEIS,1EIR analyzed the environmental consequences of the Navy disposal and local community reuse of the MCAS Tustin site per the Reuse Plan and the MCAS Tustin Specific PlarvReuse Plan. The CEQA analysis also analyzed the environmental impacts of certain "Implementation Actions" that the City of Tustin and City of Irvine must take to implement the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan. The FEIS/EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program were adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001. The DoN published its Record of Decision (ROD) on March 3, 2001. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The WAS Tustin Specific Plan and the FEIS/EIR and Addendum analyzed a multi-vear development period for the planned urban reuse project. When individual activities with the t MCAS 'Tustin Specific Plan are proposed, the planning agency is required to examine individual activities to determine if their effects were fully analyzed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. The planning agency can approve the activities as being within the scope of the project covered by the FEIS/EIR and Addendum if the agency finds that pursuant to Sections 15162, 15164, and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines no new effects would occur, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects occur, then no supplemental or subsequent environmental document is required. For the proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 17404 project, the City prepared a comprehensive Environmental Checklist and the analysis is provided below to determine if the project is within the scope of the FEIS/EIR and Addendum and if new effects would occur as a result of the project. PROJECT LOCATION The Property is within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan also known as Tustin Legacy, TTM 17404 consists of approximately 627.9 acres of land at Tustin Legacy and is located within Neighborhoods B. D, and G of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Planning Areas 7, 8, 13-I5). Tustin Legacy is that portion of the former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin within the City of Tustin corporate boundaries. Owned and operated by the Navy and Marine Corps for _y nearly 60 years, approximately 1,585 gross acres of property at MCAS Tustin were determined surplus to federal government needs and was officially closed in July 1999. The majority of the former MCAS Tustin lies within the southern portion of the City of Tustin.'Che remaining NOS NO— approximately 73 acres lies within the City of Irvine. EI W Resolution 11-60 Page 14 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental impacts TTM 17404 (Convevance) Page 2 �z Tustin Legacy is also located in central Orange County and approximately 40 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles. Tustin Legacy is in close proximity to four major freeways: the Costa Mesa (SR -55), Santa Ana (I-5), Laguna (SR -133) and San Diego (I-405). Tustin Legacy is also served by the west leg of the Eastern Transportation Corridor (SR 261). The major roadways bordering Tustin Legacy include Red Hill Avenue on the west, Edinger Avenue and Irvine Center Drive on the north, Harvard Avenue on the east, and Barranca Parkway on the south. Jamboree Road transects the Property. John Wayne Airport is located approximately three miles to the south and a Metrolink Commuter Rail Station is located immediately to the north providing daily passenger service to employment centers in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Diego counties. PRESENT CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY Historically, the Property was used as a Marine Corps helicopter training facility. Currently, the actual footprint of the Property is largely undeveloped land that was previously used for interim agricultural out -leasing by the Marines and also improved with landing strips and tarmac areas. Demolitions of abandoned buildings, tarmac areas, and landing strips have substantially been completed. Interim earthwork and mass grading have commenced. Rough grading in the area of Red Hill Ave. and Barranca Ave. as well as the installation of storm drain pipelines and retention facilities have also commenced. The City of Irvine is currently widening Barranca PRIZE, Ave. near Red Hill Ave. and providing underground storm drain facilities in this area. C TENTA'T'IVE TRACT MAP 17404 TTM 17404 would subdivide a 627,9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes only. The site is generally bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Armstrong Road to the west. The project area is located entirely within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/ Reuse Plan area (Tustin Legacy). No development in conjunction with this map is being proposed. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following information provides background support for the conclusions identified in the Frivironmental Analysis Checklist. I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Resolution 11-60 Page 15 of 34 Fvalualion of Environmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 3 No Substantial Change front Previous Analysis. The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development plan is proposed with the subdivision and therefore the project will have no substantial adverse effects on a scenic vista. The proposed project has no potential for substantially damaging scenic resources, degrade the existing visual character, or create a new source of substantial light or glare. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. MitigatioWN 16nitoring Required: None. Sources: Tentative Tract Map Field Observations FEIS(EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-84, 4-109 through 114) and Addendum (Page 5-3 through 5-8) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan 11. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the A California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in i assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is associated with the project. The proposed TTM 17404 will not directly cause Agricultural impacts. The project site was leased as interim agriculture sites. All agricultural activities on the site and Navy out leases were terminated in phases by the Navy prior to the closure of MCAS Tustin in July, 1999. The physical impact area for the proposed TTM 17404 is the same as that identified in the 11:.B F;IR and Addendum. Although not proposed at this time, implementation of the u proposed project would continue to impact areas mapped but not used as Prime Farmland. Additionally, there are no areas subject to a Williamson Act contract, and conservation of farmland in this area was deemed unwarranted by NC;RS. The loss of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. The mitigation options previously identified in the FEISiMR and Addendum are still Resolution 11-60 Page 16 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 4 infeasible and would be ineffective to reduce the localized adverse effects associated with the loss of mappedfdesignated farmland. t There are no new feasible mitigation measures that could be implemented that would reduce the significant unavoidable impact associated with the conversion of Farmland to urban uses. Mitigation options identified in the FEIS/EIR determined to be infeasible are still infeasible and ineffective to reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. There would not be a substantial increase in the severity of project -specific and cumulative impacts to agricultural resources beyond that identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum, however, these impacts would continue to be significant unavoidable impacts of the proposed project. The Tustin City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the FEIS/EIR on January 16.2001. All implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/EIR for ACAS Tustin and Addendum. Mitigatiorv'Monitoring Required: In certifying the FEIS/EIR, the Tustin City Council 611 adopted Findings of Fact and Statement in Overriding Consideration concluding that w impacts to agricultural resources were unavoidable (Resolution No. 00-90). No mitigation �n WI is required. Sources: Field Observations 11"IS/1 IR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-84. 4-109 through 114) and Addendum (Page 5-8 through 5-10) Resolution No, 00-90 MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan III. AIR QUALITY --- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Resolution 11-60 Page 17 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance)110 M, Page 5 OMEN No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The conveyance tentative tract map has no potential to violate air quality standards, or contribute to a cumulatively considerable increase of any criteria pollutant for the project region. The project wi Il not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration or create objectionable odor. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report and addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FFIS/EIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigationthlonitoring Required- Specific mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in certifying the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for operational and construction activities. However, the FEIS/EIR and .Addendum also concluded that the Reuse Plan related operational air quality impacts were significant and could not be fully mitigated. A Statement of Overriding Considerations for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001 (Resolution No. 00-90). No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. I .Sources: Field Observations FIBER, ' FI:ISIC'IR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-143 throughl53, 4-207 through 4-230, pages 7-41 through 7-42 and Addendum Pages 5-10 through 5-28) MCAS Tustin Specific Plam'Reusc Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Resolution No. 00-90 Tustin General Plan IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or MINE, other means? Resolution 11-60 Page 18 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 0 'FIN 17404 (Conveyance) r Page 6 r d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? ,Vo Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts ane anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum found that implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would not result in impacts to federally listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species; however, the FEIS/EIR and Addendum determined that implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (including the proposed project site) could impact jurisdictional waters/wetlands and the southwestern pond turtle, FIRE! which is identified as a "species of special concern" by the California Department of Fish rand Game (CDFG), or have an impact on jurisdictional waters/wetlands. Mitigation measures were included in the WAS Tustin FEIS/EIR and Addendum to require the relocation of the turtles and establishment of an alternative off-site habitat, and to require the applicant to obtain Section 444, Section 1601, and other permits as necessary for areas on the project site affecting jurisdictional waters of the U.S. or vegetated wetlands. Appropriate permits have been obtained and are subject to conditions listed in the respective permits. Future implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program for MCAS "Tustin and Addendum. iWitigariorv'Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for future developments. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. .sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS "Tustin (Pages 3-75 through 3- 82, 4-103 through 4-108, 7-26 through 7-27 and Addendum pages 5-28 through 5-40) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-I04 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan Resolution 11-60 Page 19 of 34 �J Evaluation of Environmental impacts TTM 17404(Conveyance)WIN. Page 7 ONE �s V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5." h) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal cemeteries.? .No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project has no potential to change the significance of a historical resource, or destroy a unique paleontological resource. Future development activities have been previously considered within the Program FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. Numerous archaeological surreys have been conducted at the former MCAS Tustin site. In 1988, the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) provided written concurrence that all open spaces on MCAS Tustin had been adequately surveyed for archaeological resources. Although one archaeological site (CA -ORA -381) has been recorded within the Reuse Plan area, it is believed to have been destroyed. It is 1 011 possible that previously unidentified buried archaeological or paleontological resources within the project site could he significantly impacted by grading and construction activities. With the inclusion of mitigation measures identified in the MCAS Tustin FEIS/EIR and Addendum that require construction monitoring, potential impacts to cultural resources can be reduced to a level of insignificance. There is no new technology or methods available to reduce the identified significant unavoidable project -specific and cumulative impacts to historical resources associated with the removal of Hangars 28 and 29 to a level considered less than significant. Although these unavoidable project -specific and cumulative impacts would not occur with the proposed `["I'M 17404 (tor conveyance only), future development within the Master development footprint could present impacts to these resources. A Statement of Overriding Considerations for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001, to address potential significant unavoidable impacts to historical resources resulting from the removal of both blimp hangars. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. All implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. ffiffl Alitigation/19o»itoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the "Tustin City 01,N NN. Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures are included in the Mitigation W Monitoring Program for future developments or as conditions of approval for titture developments. No refinements need to be made to the FEIS/EIR and Addendum mitigation Resolution 11-60 Page 20 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM { 7404 (Conveyance) Page 8 measures and no mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observations FEISIEIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-68 through 3- 74, 4-93 through 4-102, 7-24 through 7-26, and Addendum Pages 540 through 5-45) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. • Strong seismic ground shaking? WIN • Seismic-relatcd ground failure, including liquefaction? • Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (2001), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The FEISIEIR and Addendum indicate that impacts to soils and geology resulting from implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would include non -seismic hazards (such as local settlement, regional subsidence, expansive soils, slope instability, erosion, and mudflows) and seismic hazards (such as surface fault displacement, high-intensity ground shaking, ground failure and lurching, seismically induced settlement, and flooding associated with dam failure. However, the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum concluded that compliance with state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, would avoid unacceptable risk or the creation of significant impacts related to Resolution 11-60 Page 21 of 34 fli Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17444 (Conveyance) gsom Page 9 a V such hazards. No substantial change is expected for development of the project from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS,'EIR for WAS Tustin and Addendum. All implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEISIEIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. MiiigationJfonitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations would avoid the creation of potential impacts. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources. I ield Observations FEISIEIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-88 through 3- 97, 4-115 through 4-123, 7-28 through 7-29 and Addendum Pages 5-46 through 5-49) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan M Vit. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: 110 i a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 1 5111 g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency 011-4 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Resolution 11-60 Page 22 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ®rr"ATTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 10 1 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Substantia! Change from Previous Analysis The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and its Addendum include a detailed discussion of the historic and current hazardous material use and hazardous waste generation within the Specific Plan area. The DoN is responsible for planning and executing environmental restoration programs in response to releases of hazardous substances for MCAS Tustin. The FEISIEIR and Addendum concluded that the implementation of the Specific Plan would not have a significant environmental impact from the hazardous wastes, substances, and materials on the property during construction or operation since the DoN would implement various remedial actions pursuant to the Compliance Programs that would remove, manage, or isolate potentially hazardous substances in soils and groundwater. As identified in the FEIS/EIR and the Addendum, the project site is within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) and is subject to height restrictions. The TTM 17404 does not propose changes to height limitation included in the Specific Plan, nor do they pose an aircraft -related safety hazard for future residents or workers. 'Me project R.� site is not located in a wildland fire danger area. 10 Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. Mitigatiott,'Mfonitoring Required: Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CI:QA as may he required by law. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin pages (3-106 through 3- 117, 4-130 through 4-138, 7-30 through 7-31, and Addendum Pages 549 through 5-55) WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) for Southern Parcels 4-8, 10-2, 14, and 42, and Parcels 25, 26, 30-33, 37 and Portion of 40 and 41 Finding of Suitability to Lease (FOSL) for Southern Parcels Care -out Areas 1, 2, 3,and 4 Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AH.UP) Tustin General PIan Resolution 11-60 Page 23 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 174(A (Conveyance) Page I 1 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially atter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff". f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map". h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or muditow? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will not impact groundwater in the deep regional aquifer or shallow aquifer. The project is not located within a 100 -year flood area and will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury and death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or darn, nor is the proposed project susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. 021 MINE OWE 9 FIRMS, g go As concluded in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum, preparation of a WQMP in compliance with MEN all applicable regulatory standards would reduce water quality impacts from the PIN development activities to a level of insignificance, Implementation of the proposed TTM would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to water quality than what was previously identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Resolution 11-60 Page 24 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 12404 (Conveyance) Pagc 12 Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/I:IR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. ,WitigationlMonitoring Required: Compliance with existing rules and regulations would reduce any potential impacts related to water quality and groundwater to a level of insignificance and no mitigation is required. Measures related to hydrology and drainage were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin and Addendum; these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program or as conditions of approval for future projects. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/HIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-98 through 3- 105, 4-124 through 4-129, 7-29 through 7-30 and Addendum Pages 5-56 through 5-92) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan r� �IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited, to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? .Vo Substantia! Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The proposed subdivision would not alter the land uses proposed for development or the location of the land uses in relation to communities within the Specific Plan area. The project site area is surrounded by existing development and future development on-site would not physically divide an established community. Also, the proposed project will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required 031 by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. Aditigation�Honitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that there would be no significant unavoidable land use impacts. The TTM 17404 for conveyance purposes Resolution 11-60 Page 25 of 34 V �' Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 13 w7W does not increase the severity of the land use impacts previously identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; therefore, no refinements needed to he made to the FEIS/EIR and Addendum mitigations and no new mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Fl-'IS/FIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-3 to 3-17, 4-3 to 4-13, 7-16 to 7-18 and Addendum Pages 5-92 to 5-95) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are IMI anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum indicated that no mineral resources are known to occur anywhere within the Specific Plan area. The proposed project will not result in the 09 loss of mineral resources known to be on the site or identified as being present on the site by 01-1 any mineral resource plans. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Hitit'ationlMonitoring Required: No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-91) and Addendum (Page 5-95) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) "Tustin General Plan XI. NOISE — Would the project: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or = ground borne noise levels`' NINEIN IN c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Resolution 11-60 Page 26 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fit; K TTM 17404(Conveyance) Page 14 e d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? i For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ,Vo Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no noise impacts are anticipated. The proposed subdivision will not increase the severity of the long-term tratJic-rclated noise impacts more than previously identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. With respect to the short-term noise impacts, future development would be required to comply with adopted mitigation measures and state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, thus avoiding significant p: short-term construction -related noise impacts. As discussed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum, John Wayne Airport is located southwest of the project site. Based on review of the Airport Land Use Plan for John Wayne, the project site is not located within the 60 CNEL contour for airport operations. The proposed TTM 17404 is for conveyance purposes only and would not expose people to excessive noise related to aircraft operations. Mitigatioti/Monitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that with implementation of identified mitigation measures, there would be no impacts related to noise. The 17M 17404 does not increase the severity of the noise impacts previously identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; therefore, no refinements need to be made to the FEIS/EIR and Addendum mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-154 through 3- 162) and Addendum (Page 5-96 through 5-99) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan XII. POPULATION & HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Resolution 11-60 Page 27 of 34 Li 0 L" 4 Evaluation of Fnvironmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 15 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construcdan of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Substantia/ Change from Previous Analysis. The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts to population and housing are anticipated. No new housing, removal of existing housing, or displacement of any people to necessitate construction of additional housing are proposed with the TTM 17404. The proposed TTM 17404 would not have an adverse effect on population and housing. Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law, leo substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/ETR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. .bfitigatiarvhtonitoring Required: The proposed TTM 17404 does not change the conclusions of the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; no refinements need to be made to the FEISIEIR and Addendum mitigation measures and no new mitigation measures for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observations FEISIEIR for Disposal and Rcuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-18 to 3-34, 4- 14 to 4-29, and 7-18 to 7-19) and Addendum Pages (5-101 through 5-112) MCAS Tustin Specific PlarvReuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62. pages 3- 70 through 3-81. pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts public services are anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin requires developers of the site to contribute to the creation of public services such as fire and police protection services, schools, libraries, recreation facilities, and biking/hiking trails. New facilities will be provided within the Master Developer footprint upon development of the site. Lire Protection. Future development will be required to meet Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) regulations regarding construction materials and methods, emergency Resolution 11-60 Page 28 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ROUND' TTM 17404 (Conveyance) ro Page 16 access, water mains, fire flow, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, building setbacks, and other relevant regulations. Adherence to these regulations would reduce the risk of uncontrollable fire and increase the ability to efficiently provide fire protection services to the site. The number of existing fire stations in the areas surrounding the site and a future fire station proposed at Edinger Avenue and the West Connector Road will meet the demands created by the proposed project. Police Protection. The need for police protection services is assessed on the basis of resident population estimates, square footage of non-residential uses, etc. Future implementation of the project site in compliance with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would not increase the need for police protection services in addition to what was anticipated in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. As a condition of approval, future development projects would be required to work with the Tustin Police Department to ensure that adequate security precautions are implemented in the project at plan check. Schools. The impacts to schools resulting from future implementation of the proposed Tentative Tract Map would be similar to that identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Consistent with SB 50, the City of Tustin has adopted implementation measures that K require future developer to pay applicable school fees to the TUSD to mitigate indirect M and direct student generation impacts prior to the issuance of building permits (Neighborhoods B, D, and G is located within the TUSD boundary). The payment of school mitigation impact fees authorized by SB 50 is deemed to provide "full and complete mitigation of impacts" from the development of real property on school facilities (Government Code 65995). SB 50 provides that a state or local agency may not deny or refuse to approve the planning, use, or development of real property on the basis of a developer's refusal to provide mitigation in amounts in excess of that established by SB 50. Other Public Facilities (Libraries}. Since certification of the FEIS/EIR, the Orange County Library (OCPL) entered into an agreement with the City of Tustin for the expansion of the Tustin Branch library. The expansion of the library is a capital improvement of a public facility that will directly benefit development activities within the Specific Plan area. Developers within the Specific Plan arca are required to make a fair share contribution to a portion of the development costs of the library expansion. To support development in the reuse plan area, the Reuse Plar/Specific Plan requires public services and facilities to be provided concurrent with demand. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that public facilities would be provided according to a phasing plan to meet projected needs as development of the site proceeded. The proposed TTM 17404 is for conveyance only and would not increase the demand of public services more than what was already analyzed in the previously approved FEIS/EIR and Addendum; therefore, no substantial change is expected. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that there would be no significant unavoidable impacts related to public services. The proposed TTM 17404 Resolution 11-60 Page 29 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17.304 (Conveyance) Page 17 would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to public services beyond that identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Therefore, no refinements or new mitigation measures are required for a subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-47 to 3-57, 4- 56 to 4-80 and 7-21 to 7-22) and Addendum (Pages 5-112 through 5-122) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impacts associated with recreation tacilities were analyzed and addressed in the FEIS/EIR MIS i, and Addendum. The proposed TTM 17404 is for conveyance purposes only and no development is proposed. Therefore, the proposed Tentative Tract Map would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts related to recreation services compared to conclusions of the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. tl Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CVQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. Mitigation%Vnnitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that there would be no significant unavoidable impacts related to recreation facilities. Additionally, the proposed TTM 17404 for conveyance purposes would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts to recreation facilities beyond that identified in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Therefore, no new mitigation measures are required. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin pages 3-47 to 3-57, 4-56 to 4-80, 7-21 to 7-22 and Addendum Pages 5-122 through 5-127 MCAS Tustin Specific PlarvReuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin City Code Section 9331 d (1) (b) Tustin General Plan Resolution 11-60 Page 30 of 34 E WE t Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 1 T"I"M 17404 (Conveyance) Call Page IS r XV. TRANSPORTATIONIIRAFFIC --- Would the project; a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No new impacts or substantially more severe impacts would result from TTM 17404 than were originally considered by the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Therefore, no new or rcvised mitigation measures are required. Sources Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-118 through 3- 142, 4-139 through 4-206 and 7-32 through 7-42) and Addendum (pages 5- 127 through 5-147) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Pian Legacy Park of Tustin Legacy Traffic Analysis, March 2007, Austin Foust Associates, Inc. (Exhibit 1) Resolution 11-60 Page 31 of 34 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? NUNN The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposcd and no impacts are anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum concluded that traffic impacts could occur as a result of build out of the Specific Plan. The FEIS/EIR concluded that there could be significant impacts at 18 arterial interscetions (see Table 4.12-6 of the FEIS/EIR for a complete list) and the levels of service (LOS) at two intersections would improve compared to the no-projcct condition. The trip generation resulting from implementation of the original Specific Plan and Addendum would create an overall Average Daily Trip (ADT) generation of 216,440 trips. The original Specific Plan also established a trip budgct tracking system for each neighborhood to analyze and control the amount and intensity of non-residential development by neighborhood. The tracking system ensures that sufficicnt ADT capacity exists to serve future development. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No new impacts or substantially more severe impacts would result from TTM 17404 than were originally considered by the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Therefore, no new or rcvised mitigation measures are required. Sources Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-118 through 3- 142, 4-139 through 4-206 and 7-32 through 7-42) and Addendum (pages 5- 127 through 5-147) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Pian Legacy Park of Tustin Legacy Traffic Analysis, March 2007, Austin Foust Associates, Inc. (Exhibit 1) Resolution 11-60 Page 31 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 14 `. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) [lave sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid HE waste? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The FEIS/EIR and Addendum analyzed new off-site and on-site backbone utility systems required for development of the site as necessary to support the proposed development, including water, sewer, drainage, electricity, natural gas, telephone, cable television, and solid waste management. In accordance with the FEIS/EIR and Addendum, future development of the site is required to pay a fair share towards off-site infrastructure and installation of on-site facilities. In addition, development of the site is required to meet federal, state, and local standards for design of waste water treatment, drainage system for on-site and off-site, and water availability. As concluded in the FEISlEIR and Addendum, no unavoidable significant impacts would result. The proposed TTM 17404 for conveyance only would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts than what was evaluated in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. MitigationlMonitoring Required, No new impacts or substantially more severe impacts would result from the proposed TTM 17404; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are required. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of WAS Tustin (pages 3-35 through 3- NMI 46, 4-32 through 4-55 and 7-20 through 7-21) and Addendum (pages 5-147 �h through 5-165) WAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3.82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) Resolution 11-60 Page 32 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts N TTM 17404 (Conveyance) Page 20 Tustin General Plan XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The FEIS/EIR and Addendum previously considered all environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the proposed TTM 17404. with the enforcement of the FEISIEIR and Addendum mitigation and implementation measures approved by the Tustin City Council in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project or as conditions of approval, the proposed project would not cause unmitigated environmental effects that will cause substantial cffects on human beings either directly or indirectly nor degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitats or wildlife populations to decrease or threaten, eliminate, or reduce animal ranges, etc. To address cumulative impacts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001 (Resolution No. 00-90) for issues relating to aesthetics, cultural and paleontological resources, agricultural resources, and traffic/circulation. The proposed YFM 17404 is for conveyance only and does not create any impacts that have not been previously addressed by the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Sources Field Observations Fl TIS/I� IR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 5-4 through 5-11) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Pages 3-35 through 3-62, pages 3- 70 through 3-81, pages 3-82 through 3-88, and pages 3-104 through 3-137) and Addendum Resolution No. 00-90 Tustin General Plan CONCLUSION t� The proposed project's effects were previously examined in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin and Addendum. No new effects will occur, no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects will occur, no new mitigation measures will be Resolution 11-60 Page 33 of 34 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts T7M 17404 (Conveyance) V" � Page 21 required, no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and no new mitigation measures or alternatives applicable to the project that have not been considered are needed to substantially reduce effects of the project. Implementation of activities and development at the project site could be subject to subsequent environmental review under CEQA as may be required by law. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the Program FEISIEIR for WAS Tustin and Addendum. WE *11 Resolution 11-60 Page 34 of 34 RESOLUTION NO. 11-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP 17404 TO SUBDIVIDE A 627.9 -ACRE SITE INTO 58 NUMBERED LOTS AND 119 LETTERED LOTS LOCATED WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS B, D, AND A PORTION OF G (PLANNING AREAS 7, 8, 13-15) OF THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY BOUNDED BY EDINGER AVENUE TO THE NORTH, JAMBOREE ROAD TO THE EAST, BARRANCA PARKWAY TO THE SOUTH, AND ARMSTRONG ROAD TO THE WEST FOR FINANCING AND CONVEYANCE PURPOSES ONLY. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Final Tract Map No. 17404 was initiated by the City of Tustin to subdivide a 627.9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes. The site is generally bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Armstrong Road to the west; B. That the proposed Final Tract Map 17404 is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan land use designation of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan which designates the project sites (Planning Areas 7, 8, 13-15) as Village Services, Community Core, and Residential Core which provides for future development of offices, retail and service commercial, businesses, residences, and parks; C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for Tentative Tract Map 17404 on July 26, 2011, by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4177 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Tract Map 17404, D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for Tentative Tract Map 17404 on September 6, 2011, by the City Council and the Council adopted Resolution No. 11-60 approving Tentative Tract Map 17404; E. That the Public Works/Engineering Department has reviewed the map and determined that it is technically correct and is in substantial conformance with the City Council's approval of the Tentative Tract Map 17404, the Subdivision Map Act, and the City Subdivision Code. F. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On April 3, 2006, the City Resolution No. 11-70 FTM 17404 Page 2 Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR and its Addendum is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The FEIS/FEIR and its Addendum considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin; and, G. That the proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development rights are associated with approval of this conveyance map. An Environmental Analysis Checklist has been prepared, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and concluded that the proposed project does not result in any new significant environmental impacts, substantial changes, or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. II. The City Council hereby approve Final Tract Map 17404 for the subdivision of an approximately 627.9 -acre site into 58 numbered lots and 119 lettered lots for financing and conveyance purposes only. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of September, 2011. JERRY AMANTE MAYOR ATTEST: PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK Resolution No. 11-70 FTM 17404 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF TUSTIN 1, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 11-70 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 20th day of September, 2011 by the following vote: • W 04 [got I N IVA I a kh 1 1003 2 COMM a PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK