Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1981 05 18MINDTSS OF A RBGQLAR MEETING OF THB TQSTIN CITY CODNCII, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way May 18, 1981 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 5:05 p.m. II. RDLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Dan Blankenship, City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Comm. Dev. Dir. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 6 in the audience III. RECESS It was moved by Kenney, seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Rede- velopment Agency meeting at 5:06 p.m. Carried 5:0. MINIITSS OF A REGQLAR MEETING RE:DEVSGC)PMENT AGENCY May 18, 1981 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 5:06 p.m. 3 i 2. Members Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Members Absent: None 3. APPImVAI, OP IIIIJQTSS - May 4, 1981 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the min- utes of the May 4, 1981, meeting. Motion carried 5:0. 4. RS.90LDTION RDA 81-3 - A Resolution of the Tustin Community Rede- velopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAIN STREET STORM DRAIN N0. 2A AND 2B, AND SIXTH STREET STORM DRAIN N0. 2C As recommended in the memo dated May 5, 1981, prepared by the Engineering Department, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to adopt Resolution RDA 81-3 and direct the Agency Secre- tary to advertise for bids. Pursuant to Councilman Edg geted for subject project, request for authorization come in considerably above Agency has the option to mntinn rarriar~ Se(]. ar's comments relative to amount bud- the City Engineer indicated this is a to advertise for bids; should bids or below the Engineer's estimate, the reject all bids at that time. The 91 5. PARKING RSQQIREMffiITS, REDSVEIAPMENT DISTRICT (190 E1 Camino Real) Following Dr. Fleagle's comments and Council discussion on the memo dated May 18, 1981, prepared by the Community Development Department regarding downtown parking needs and parking require- ments as contained in Ordinance No. 510, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue the matter until more information can be provided by staff and to allow Council review of Ordinance No. 510. Carried 5:0. 74 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 5-18-81 6. PROPERTY AOQOISITZON Dr. Fleagle provided a status report on negotiations with Gfeller Development Corporation regarding the Agency's partici- pation in development of downtown parking, and indicated staff will keep the Agency informed of any progress. In reference to the Mitchell properties, Council concurred to assure the developer that the Agency will not be in competition with him for site acquisition, as contained in the memo dated May 18, 1981, prepared by the Community Development Department. 81 7. FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 TUSTIN COlglUNITY RSDEVffi,OPNIFti'P AGS[1CY BUDGET As recommended in the memo dated May 13 , 1981 , prepared by the Finance Director, it was moved b~Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to conduct a Redevelopment Agency budget workshop/hearing that coincides with the City Council's workshop/hearing, to review the combined Fiscal Year 1981-82 budget. Motion carried 5:0. 29 8. BLANCO OFFICE BIIII.DING, 150-160 EL. CAMINO REAL Following consideration of the memo dated May 18, 1981, prepared by the Community Development Department, regarding development of an office building at 150-160 El Camino Real, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve amended elevations and materials subject to conditions of Resolution No. 1938 as follows: a. Reduction of the decks facing E1 Camino Real and "C" Street from 40' x 60' to 10' x 60' walkways. b. The addition of a two-story stairway on the "C" Street frontage. c. Rearrangement of the stair configuration on the El Camino Real frontage. d. A change in materials to substitute plaster for brick veneer on the side elevations and the reduction of brick veneer on the E1 Camino Real and "C" Street elevations. Carried 5:0. 81 9. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 81-4 -A Resolution of the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, Tustin, California, ADOPTING A NEW CON- FLICT OF INTEREST CODE It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. RDA 81-4. Motion carried 5:0. 32 10. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adjourn at 5:36 p.m. to the City Council evening session, and thence to a Redevelopment Agency/Council budget workshop to be held Wednes- day, May 20, 1981, in the City Hall Conference Room. Carried 5:0. CORD G SECRE RY CHAIRMAN i MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY CDUNCII, RHCOIiVEIIED AT 7:33 P.K. May 18, 1981 I. GALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 7:33 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 5-18-81 z II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Comm. Dev. Dir. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Charles Thayer, Chief of Police Approximately 25 in the audience III. PIm- CLAMATION This item was continued to the next meeting because Dan Linkhorn was unable to be at the meeting to receive the proclamation. III. PUBLIC HBARIIIGS 1. ORDINANCE NO. 846 (Continued Public Hearing) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROV- ING THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM C-1 TO CG DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF RED HILL AVENUE AND NISSON ROAD (Zone Change 81-2 - Eugene and Rita Tutt) 1 R. Kenneth Fleagle, Acting Community Development Director, reported that this property is on the northeasterly corner of Red Hill Avenue and Nilson Road, formerly occupied by Mr. Ups restaurant, now occupied by a Shell Service Station and an Auto- mobile Leasing Agency. Adjoining is a single family residence and a nursery operating on an expired Use Permit. The automo- bile leasing agency is not a permitted use in the C-1 zone and it is recommended that the property be reclassified to the Com- mercial General District. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:36 p.m. There being no comments or objections, it was moved bX Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to amend the ordinance by the inclusion of the three conditions that had been listed in the Use Permit of guaranteeing that the street improvements be done or bond for the street improvements, filing of a subdivision parcel map, and the removal of the outdoor advertising signs. In response to Councilman Saltarelli's question, the City Attor- ney said that the inclusion of the removal of the billboard was permissible and the City would not be required to pay the owner for the billboard. Councilman Saltarelli felt it would be more fair to give a time limit of three or four years for the removal of the billboard. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, Attorney Rourke stated that at the end of the three year period, there could be a possibil- ity that the City would have to initiate a law suit for removal of the billboard if the applicant refused to remove it. Dr. Fleagle indicated that Mr. Tutt's initial response to these con- ditions was that he would rather have the building vacant than to remove the billboard. A substitute motion was made by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to amend the ordinance by adding the following three conditions: 1) That applicant will post a bond that he will do his share of the street improvements when the property is developed or when the street improvements can be installed without impacting the on-site property and blocking drainage; CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 5-18-81 2) File a subdivision parcel map; and 3) The recording of a signed agreement as prepared by the City Attorney and the posting of a bond to guarantee the removal of the billboards from subject property at no expense to the City within three (3) years from the date of the adoption of this ordinance. Motion carried 5:0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 846 as modified have first reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 846 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 846 be introduced. Carried 5:0. 110 2. ORDINANCE NO. 847 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO SUBDIVISIONS Dr. Fleagle reported that the subdivision ordinance is an exten- sive section of the Municipal Code and when the State Legisla- ture amends the Subdivision Act, which is frequently, it is nec- essary for the City to revise its ordinance since it is manda- tory for most sections of that Act that the City follow the same provisions. To eliminate the need to submit annual amendments and publish, we are proposing that the State Act be adopted by reference and adopt only those amendments to it that are permis- sive. Instead of incorporating modification of fees into the ordinance, we have incorporated subdivision map fees into a resolution. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:56 P.M. There being no comma ments or objections, the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 847 have first reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 847 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 847 be introduced. Carried 5:0. 99 RESOLUTION NO. 81-53 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-28 PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISH- MENT OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES (Subdivision Fees, License and Permit Board Fees and Microfilming of Building Records Fees) It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolu- tion No. 81-53. Carried 5:0. 50 3. APPEAL OF DBNIAL OF IISE PSRMIT 81-16 (James Glomb, 13121-13296 Gwyneth - To authorize the conversion of an apartment complex carport to a meeting room for group meditation.) Dr. Fleagle reported that staff had talked with the applicant and they have agreed to withdraw the Appeal and staff has their letter to this effect. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 5-18-81 O. PDBLIC CONCBRNS 1. Al~NDI~NTS TO BIIILDING CODE REGARDING SWII~QNG POOLS Henry Dennis Gankema, 13501 Diamond Head Dr., Tustin, was opposed to the amendments to the Building Code regarding con- struction of the swimming pools and surrounding decking and ' drainage around pools. Mr. Gankema agreed to discuss the matter with staff as suggested by Mayor Sharp. Dr. Fleagle said that he would have a report on this for the next meeting. 30 2. TRAFFIC, SPEED ZONES, AND PARKING ON 1rQTCHEL.L AVffiQUS Jane Schaffer, 1735 Mitchell Avenue, spoke in the interest of safety and accidents that occur on Mitchell Avenue. She asked for red curbing along the driveways and for posting of speed zones. It was moved by^Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to hear New Busi- ness No. 5 at this time which addresses this problem. Carried 5:0. 100 VI. NSW BIISINBSS 5. lSITCSSI,L AVffidIIS PARKING, SPEED ZONING AND STOP INVESTIGATION Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that he had some addi- tional input that was not in the staff report. He reviewed the staff report that was requested by the City Council and many residents along Mitchell Avenue with respect to three items: 1) ~ Visibility of motorists exiting driveways; 2) Speed zone; and 3) Stop sign installation at Heatherfield and Mitchell Ave. While the staff was in the process of studying Mitchell Ave., the ~- curbs were painted red by a representative or employee of 1722 Mitchell. Shortly after that we discovered someone had painted the curbs adjacent to 1731 Mitchell. Both of these actions are in violation of the Tustin City Code. Each of the condominiums have on site parking but several of the garages on site have been enclosed or are being utilized for storage. Some of the CC&R's do not allow recreational vehicles to be parking on site. We conducted a speed study and 85B of the drivers on Mitchell are driving 40 to 45 MPH. We would recommend a 30 MPH speed zone and that it be enforced by radar. We did the warrant study for stop signs and the intersection of Mitchell and Heatherfield did not warrant stop signs, therefore staff is recommending that stop signs not be put in. Tom Hartnett, 1731 Mitchell, agreed with 30 MPH speed zone but thought most of the problem was with the types of vehicles parked on the street that blocked visibility. Catherine Young, 1771 Mitchell Ave., expressed that campers or recreational vehicles were not the problem but speeders were. She was in favor of 25 MPH speed zone and the stop signs. She would go along with 15 ft. of red curbing at driveways. Warren Ettelman, 14262 Mitchell, was in favor of the stop signs, but felt the red zones needed to be at least 25 ft. at driveways because the campers and RV's cause the problem. He thanked Bob Ledendecker and Councilman Saltarelli for their cooperation in dealing with this problem. Jim Short, 1722 Mitchell, agreed with putting in the stop signs, reducing the speed, and leaving the red zones at approximately what they are at present. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 5-18-81 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded ~ Kennedx, that: 1) Mitchell Avenue between Red Hill and Browning be speed zoned at 30 MPH, to be enforced by radar, and posted properly and vis- ibly; 2) Additional red curbing as proposed on the City Engi- neer's map be placed on the curbs as soon as possible; and 3) Three-way stop sign be installed at Mitchell Avenue and Heather- field Avenue. Saltarelli suggested that the Council review this area in a few months. Al Cannellini, 1811 Mitchell Avenue, said that he was one of the first RV owners in the area and he is guilty of parking his RV on the street. He suggested that the condominiums change their CC&R's to allow RV's to park on-site, even if there was a charge for it. Motion carried 5:0. 100 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 4, 1981. 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in the amount of $565,553.30. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $90,477.68. 3. DENIAL OF APPLICATION TO FILE LATE CLAIM BY RANDY WELSH DATE/ LOSS 10-8-80 Denial of Application to File Late Claim by Randy Welsh as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF JON ALVIN ILLINGWORTH, ALLSTATE INSURANCE DEAN BEAUMONT AND STATB FARM INSURANCE CO., DATE/I,OSS 12-18-80 Denial of Claims of Jon Alvin Illingworth, Allstate Insur- ance, Dean Beaumont and State Farm Insurance Co. as recom- mended by the City Attorney. 40 5. POPULATION CSRTZPICATION Confirmation of the request for certification of the Janu- ary 1, 1981 population estimate as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 33 6. RESOLDTION NO. 81-55 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND OWNERSHIP OF LOW-RENT HOUSING PROJECTS, OF NOT TO EXCEED 5$ OF THE TOTAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND APPROVING THE FORM OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE ORANGE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION Adoption of Resolution No. 81-55 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. (See page 7) 7. RESOLUTION NO. 81-56 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin OVER- RULING THE PLANNING AGENCY AND APPROVING A USE PERMIT FOR THE B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION AT SUITES H & I, 13112 NEWPORT AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 81-56 as requested by the City Council. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 5-18-81 8. RESOI.DTZON NO. 81-57 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION TO BE HELD IN TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION N0. 121, IRVINE BLVD.-DEAN STREET TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN ON THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 1981, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK Adoption of Resolution No. 81-57 as recommended by the City Clerk. 24 48 9. RESOLUTION NO. 81-60 A Resolution of the City Council, City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 81-61 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES OF THE DEPARTMENTS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPLICABLE TO DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES THEREOF Adoption of Resolution No. 81-60 and No. 81-61 as recommended by the City Attorney. 32 d 10. APPOINTMffi~iT OF INTERIM CITY ADMINISTRATOR To appoint Charles Thayer, Chief of Police, as Interim City Administrator for the period from June 1, 1981 to the reporting date of the new City Manager with an additional compensation of $300.00 per month above his compensation as Chief of Police during said period as recommended by the City Administrator. 35 11. ASSEMBLY BILL 2055 APPEALING THE GOVERNMENT CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS Authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letter opposing this bill. 61 12. RESOLUTION NO. 81-53 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 80-28 PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES Adoption of Resolution No. 81-53 as recommended by the Acting Community Development Director and the City Council. 13. 30 DAY TIME E%TENSION OF NEWPORT AVENUE MEDIAN LANDSCAPE CONTRACT Grant a thirty day time extension to the firm of Grissom and Johnson, Inc. for the Newport Avenue median landscape contract as recommended by the City Engineer. 92 Item 6 of the Consent Calendar was removed by Saltarelli and Hoesterey removed Item 12 as this Resolution was adopted under Public Hearing No. 2 (recorded on Page 4 of these Minutes). It was moved by_ Edgar, seconded ~ Kennedy, to approve the Consent Calendar as submitted except for Items 6 and 12. Carried 5:0. 6. RBSOLUTION NO. 81-55 Councilman Saltarelli said that this was not his understanding of the referendum that was put on the ballot. This turns control over to the Orange County Housing Authority. He said he would like for the City Attorney to report on the ramifications if this was turned down by the Council. It was moved b~Saltarelli, seconded ~ HoestereY, to continue this to the next meeting with a report from the City Attorney. Carried 5:0. 45 81 67 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 5-18-81 VIII. ORDINANCBS FOR INTRC)- DUCPION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 848 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING THE TUSTZN CITY CODE TO CREATE AND ESTABLISH THE OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER The City Attorney reported that it had been brought to his attention that some of the language could be changed to not limit to masculine gender. Councilman Saltarelli objected to this. He said the law says that refers to both male and female. It was moved b~Kennedy to amend the ordinance to include both genders. The motion died for lack of a second. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 848 have first reading by title only. Councilman Hoesterey brought up that at the last meeting there was some concern over the wording in Section 1412 of the Ordi- nance that says "The City Manager shall take his orders and instructions from the City Council when sitting in a duly held meeting of the City Council." The concern was that the Manager would only respond to all items directed at the Council meet- ing. He asked if that wording was overly limited. The City Attorney responded that it is customary in a City Mana- ger ordinance to provide something like that and that it was an appropriate provision. Motion carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 848, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to introduce Ordinance No. 848. Carried 5:0. 35 2. ORDINANCB NO. 849 An Ordinance of the City of Tustin AMENDING SECTION F3 OF ORDI- NANCE N0. 835 ADOPTING THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TO PROVIDE FEES FOR MICROFILMING OF BUILDING RECORDS It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 849 have first reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 849 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to introduce Ordinance No. 849. Carried 5:0. 30 50 3. ORDINANCB NO. 850 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING SECTION 1534 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO APPLICATION FEES TO THE LICENSE AND PERMIT BOARD It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordi- nance No. 850 have first reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 850, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to introduce Ordinance No. 850. Carried 5:0. 31 50 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 5-18-81 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE RELATIVE Td NOISE CONTROL It was moved b~ Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 845 have second reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 845 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoester~, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 845 be passed and adopted. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 843 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY THE ADDITION TO SECTION 8105, ADOPTION OF THE STATE HISTORICAL CODE It was moved_by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 843 have second reading by title only. Carried 5:0. Z%. ORDI- NANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 845 ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp NOES: None 81 Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 843 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 843 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp NOES: None 81 %. OLD BIISINBSS 1. 41' STRIP OF LAND AT THE BOY'S CLIIB Councilman Edgar reported that the City Attorney and he had met with Mr. Foster and the Boy's Club representative and had made some pro- gress but the matter is not settled yet. He will have more informa- tion at the next meeting. 85 %Z. NBW BDSINESS 1. AWARD OF BZD FOR ~•~`~'RTC & TELEPHONE IITZLZTY SERVICE CONVERSIONS - SL CAMINO REAL IINDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 5 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to award the subject project contract to Raymor Electric Co. of San Gabriel, Ca., in an amount to be determined later, depending on the actual number of conversions to be performed under this contract. Carried 5:0. 104 2. SIGN CODE EgCEPTZON (13341 Newport Ave., Bank of America) It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the following signs: East elevation - 1 - 6.6 sq. ft. trademark sign 1 - 9.0 sq. ft. versateller sign 15.6 sq. ft. Total North elevation- 1 - 19 sq. ft. business I.D. 1 - 6.5 sq. ft. versateller sign 25.5 sq. ft. Total Motion carried 5:0. 93 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 5-18-81 3. WATER SALES RATE It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to consider a water rate increase for all water sales of 12$, effective July 1 , 1981 and order the City Clerk to prepare proper notice for public hearings at the June 1 and June 15 Council meetings. Carried 5:0. 107 4. FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 PRELIMINARY BIIDGST It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to schedule a Budget Workshop for May 20, 1981 at 5:00 p.m. in the Conference Room and the City Clerk to prepare proper notice for public hearings during the June 1 and June 15 Council meetings. Carried 5:0. 29 5. MITCHSL.L AVENIIB PARKING, SPEED ZONING AND STOP INVESTIGATION Recorded on Page 5 of these Minutes. 6. RESOLDTION NO. 81-59 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, SUPPORTING THE SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Zt was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adopt Resolu- tion No. 81-59. Carried 5:0. 104 7. RECOMMENDATIONS ON CERTAIN WATER MAIN BgTENSION AGRESMF.L~iTS The City Engineer reported that under the Briarcliff agreement we were able to settle for $11,000. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that the purchase of the Briarcliff agreement be approved in the amount of $11,000 from the Water Fund subject to receipt of an executed release prepared by the City Attorney and that the proposal in the case of Village Homes (held by C&C Utilities) be rejected. Carried 5:0. 107 8. AWARD OF BID - COLIIMBIIS TQSTIN PARICSITE PARKING LOT It was moved by Edgar to award the bid for the Columbus Tustin Parksite Parking Lot Landscape and Irrigation to the low bidder, Allied Sprinkler Co. of Anaheim, in the amount of $29,972.00 and to approve the supplemental appropriation of $10,000. The motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Saltarelli asked to see the plans before taking any action on this. He was interested in seeing how much extra landscaping and sprinklers were involved in the medians. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, explained that the areas in the middle of the parking lot where the bumper stops are is not a continuous type planter as normally used but are isolated islands that are left open to get the drainage through the lot. These will have trees in them unless they have lights and then just a ground cover. The islands are only six ft. wide and there will be adequate area to walk through. The area on the southerly boundary adjacent to the ballfields have some existing Orange trees which will remain and this will be a grass area. There will be an opening at approximately 150 ft. East of Pros- pect with a walk area and an opening in the fence. He said that he would send plans to the Council and if there are any changes to be made, we will try to negotiate with the low bidder. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 5-18-81 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue this to the next meeting and Councilpersons Hoesterey and Kennedy to look at the plans and make a recommendation. Councilman Hoesterey was opposed to the last half of the motion. • - The motion was amended by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue this to the next meeting and the City Council review the plans and make a recommendation. Amended motion carried 5:0. Council concurred for staff to review parking lot layouts. 77 XII. OTBBR BIISINESS 1. TQSTIN CITY BITS Royleen White, Community Services Director, reported that staff has investigated the potential value of the City bus and the company from which the bus was purchased offered to buy the bus for $14,000 which is close to double what the Maintenance Division anticipated receiving for the bus. This offer is good for only seven days. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize staff to accept the offer from National Bus Sales and Leasing Co., Inc. for sale of City bus at the price of 514,000 which was contained in the staff report dated May 15, 1981. Carried 5:0. Zt was moved b Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the Com- munity Services Department to solicit bids for a van for Council's review. Councilman Edgar asked for a report to portray a positive way in which the van will be used. 1 _ Motion carried 5:0. 87 2. E%SCOTIVE SESSION The City Attorney asked for an Executive Session for legal matters. Council concurred. 3. COF~LAINT REGARDING MOSQQITOS BEHIND 'THE BARN" RESTAIIRANT Councilwoman Kennedy reported that she had received complaints about mosquitos. Mayor Sharp said that Ralph Welsh is our representative on the Vec- tor Control. At present there is discussion about him being elected to the State Office. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, said he would contact Vector Control about the mosquitos. 67 XZII. AD.TOUIaiP~IT Zt was moved by Edclar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adjourn at 9:30 p.m. to an Executive Session on legal matters, thence to the Budget Workshop on May 20, 1981, at 5:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, and thence to the next regular meeting on June 1, 1981. Carried 5:0. ~;:~~~ ~~ MAYOR Y l~ _ ~ - w ~-~~ C Y CLERK