Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1981 06 01MINUTES OF A RBGIILAR METING OF THB TIISTIN CITY COIINCII. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way June 1, 1981 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 4:42 p.m. II. ROLL 1 CALL Councilpersons Present: Councilpersons Absent: Others Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp None James G. Rourke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Comm. Dev. Consultant Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Russ Churchman, Recreation Supervisor Nancy Miller, Administrative Aide Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk Approximately 10 in the audience AGffiIDA ORDER IB. OLD BIISINSSS 1. 41' STRIP OF LAND ADJACffidT TO BOYS' CLIIB This item was considered out of agenda order pursuant to a request from Walter Foster, who was present in the audience. Councilman Edgar reported on a meeting of the three parties Walter Foster, Boys' Club attorneys, and City representatives =• two weeks prior and stated the difficulty in obtaining accep- tanc~ from the Boys' Club attorneys on the modified agreement, ~ but no definitive objections were given. Council members expressed a desire to resolve the matter expeditiously after nearly eight months of negotiating. Following discussion, Council concurred to set a two-week time limit for resolution of the matter and advise the Boys' Club that if not resolved within that time frame, the City will pursue an agreement with Mr. Foster directly. Mr. Foster indi- cated he was agreeable with this action. 85 III. RBCSSS It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to recess at 5:00 p.m. to the Redevelopment Agency meeting. Carried 5:0. MINIITBS OF A REGQLAR I+~S'PING R1~EVSI.OP~iffi1T AGffiiCY June 1, 1981 1. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 5:00 p.m. 2. Members Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Members Absent: None 3. APPROVAL OF liINIITSS - May 18, 1981 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the minutes of the May 18, 1981, meeting. Carried 5:0. 5 . PARKING IIZRE[~]TS, R~BVffiAPMHNT DISTRICT ( 190 El Camino Real) The Community Develoi+ment Director provided the staff report on the request for waiver of nine required on-site parking spaces p„LO~ant to Ordinance No. 510. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 6-1-81 Councilman Saltarelli felt the percentage of the requested waiver was too great; Mayor Sharp stated the City needs to move forward so that downtown parking becomes a reality before con- sideration is given to parking requirement waivers and suggested a building moratorium until the parking problem is resolved; Councilman Hoesterey felt public parking should be provided for downtown commercial purposes only; Councilman Edgar stated he would not approve the waiver request and felt the Redevelopment Agency has not explored full use of its powers to greatest benefit of the City. The motion by Kennedy to begin investigation of acquisition of the school property and advise the waiver applicant was with- drawn. Councilman Saltarelli suggested that a public hearing be held to discuss public parking downtown; Councilwoman Kennedy stated that public parking does not have to be free, but can be pro- vided on a per-hour basis. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to deny the waiver of on-site parking requirements to such a degree (41$). Motion carried 5:0. 74 81 6. ffi. CAMINO REAL DTZLITY ONDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 5 The City Engineer provided clarification regarding budgeting of the project. As recommended in the memo dated May 27, 1981, prepared by the City Engineer, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the Chairman to execute the "Agreement for Replace- ment of Overhead with Underground Distribution Facilities" on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and authorize payment of $288,747.35 to Southern California Edison Company. Carried 5:0. 104 7. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to adjou8n at 5:35 p.m. to the 7:30 p.m. public hearing for Fiscal Year 1981-82 Redevelopment Agency Budget. Carried 5:0. ~. ~ RECORD G SEC ARY CHAIRMAN NESTING OF '1VSTIN CITY OOUNCIL RSCL~IVffi~SD AT 5:35 P.M. June 1, 1981 Iv. Pvsi.Ic CONCERNS Kathy Weil, 1702 Summerville, recognized by the Chairman during the Planning Agency meeting, requested that a letter be entered into the record commending and thanking the Council and Maintenance Depart- ment, particularly Councilman Saltarelli and Maintenance Superin- tendent Hugh West, for the planting of grass on Sycamore Avenue in Tustin Meadows with speed and efficiency which resulted in little traffic disruption. Mrs. Weil further complimented the Council on its appointment of Police Chief Charles Thayer as Interim City Administrator. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-1-81 V. CONSENT CALffi~iDAR 1. APPRdPAL OF lIINOTES - May 18, 1981 2. APPROVAL OF DEIKANDS in the amount of $292,128.25. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL in the amount of $90,686.11. ' 3. BUSINESS CERTIFICATE - NOT PERMIT TO VIOLATE APPLICABLE LAWS Approval of the sample wording as contained in the Report of the Finance Director dated May 22, 1981, and authorize the Finance Director to have same added to the text of the busi- ness certificate as recommended by the Finance Director. 31 4. RESOLUTION NO. 81-62 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, AMENDING THE HANDBOOK OF GUIDELINES FOR PLAN- NING, ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR PARKING LOTS Adoption of Resolution No. 81-62 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 81 5. RBSOLUTION NO. 81-63 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Fiscal Year 1980-81 Handi- capped Ramp Construction Program - Impact Construction, Inc.) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-63 and if no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days of the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, authorize payment of the final 10$ retention (5686.67) at that time as recom- mended by the Engineering Department. 92 6. RESOLUTION NO. 81-64 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 81-1026 (228 West 7 Main Street) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-64 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 7. RESOLUTION NO. 81-65 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING FINAL PARCEL MAP NO. 81-1027 (440 West Main Street) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-65 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 8. RESOLUTION NO. 81-66 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10979 (228 West Main Street, Stevens Square) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-66 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 9. RESOLUTION NO. 81-67 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11476 (14512 Holt Avenue) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-67 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 10. RESOLUTION NO. 81-68 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, DESIGNATING PLACEMENT OF CERTAIN STOP SIGNS (Mitchell at Heatherfield) Adoption of Resolution No. 81-68 as authorized by the City Council. 94 ' 11. EgTBrISION OF TffiiTATIVB TRACT NO. 10875 (15851 Pasadena, Tustin Arms II) Grant a 90-day extension as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 12. LEGISLATIVE ACTION - AB 1721 Authorize Mayor to send letters to the appropriate officials opposing AB 1721 as recommended by the Personnel Director. 61 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 6-1-81 13. LEGISLATIVE ACTION - SB 305 Authorize Mayor to send letters to the appropriate officials opposing SB 305 as recommended by the Personnel Director. 61 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5:0. RECESS - EVB[dING At 5:37 p.m. it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the 7:30 p.m. session. Carried 5:0. I~PING OF TQSTIN CITY COONCII. RSCONVffiiED AT 7:30 P.K. June 1, 1981 I. CALL TO ORDER The City Council meeting was reconvened at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Sharp. II. RDLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney Charles Thayer, Interim City Administrator Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director R. Kenneth Fleagle, Comm. Dev. Consultant Robert S. Ledendecker, City Engineer Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director (arrived 8:00 p.m.) Russ Churchman, Recreation Supervisor Earl Rowenhurst, Water Service Manager Ronald Lowenberg, Acting Chief of Police Approximately 40 in the audience III. PRO- CLA!lATIONS A proclamation was read by Mayor Sharp and presented to Dan Link- horn for the donation of many hours over a six-year period to the youth of Tustin as Director of the Annual All City Tract Meet. A proclamation designating the month of June, 1981 as "Parks and Recreation Month" was read by Mayor Sharp and presented to Russ Churchman, Recreation Supervisor. 84 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ORDINANCE NO. 851 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Cali- fornia, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO AUTHORIZE A WARIER OF OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that Ordinance No. 851 was recommended by the Planning Agency and it basically consists of a permission in the PD District of a waiver of up to 5$ of the open space, with a new minimum estab- lished at 45$ open space for such residential projects that abutt a permanent open space facility and is acceptable upon review of the Use Permit by the Planning Agency. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:39 P.M. There being no com- ments or objections, the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 851 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 6-1-81 Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 851 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 851 be introduced. Carried 5-0. 110 2. FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 CITY BQDG$T •- The Interim City Administrator reported that any public input should be heard and then continued to a Budget Torkshop on June 8th at 7:00 P.M. and thence to the continued Public Hearing on June 15, 1981. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:40 P.M. There being no com- ments or objections, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this to a Budget Workshop on June 8th at 7:00 P.M. and thence to the continued Public Hearing on June 15, 1981 at 7:30 P.M. Carried 5-0. 29 v. RECESS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to recess to the Rede- velopment Agency for a Public Hearing on the Redevelopment Budget. Carried 5-0. REDEVffiAPMffidT AGENCY MEETING 7:43 P.K. 4. PQBLIC HSARII~iG FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 REDEVELOPMENT AGffi~1CY BQDGET The Public Hearing was opened at 7:43 P.M. There being no comments or objections, it was moved by Edgar, ~ seconded by Hoesterey, to continue to a Budget Workshop on June 8, 1981 at 7:00 P.M. and then to the continued Public Hearing on ~ June 15, 1981 at 7;30 P.M. Carried 5-0. 29 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 7:44 P.M. to the Workshop on June 8 at 7:00 P.M. and thence to the next regular meeting on June 15, 1981. Carried 5-0. COUNCIL MEETING RECONVffidED 7:44 P.M. VI. PIISLIC HEARINGS 3. FTATER SALBS RATE INCREASE In the absence of the Finance Director, Charles Thayer, Interim City Administrator, gave the staff report. The Public Hearing was opened at 7:45 P.M. Ferngill Hansen, N. "C" Street, asked for an explanation of the energy cost increase and commented that the 12$ increase was more than the Senior Citizens are getting on their whole cost of living increase. Mr. Thayer responded that the major increases in the operation budget are a 40$ increase in purchased water costs, a 27B increase in purchased power; and a 10~ increase in pump tax. Capital improvements amount to $289,800. If rates are not raised this year, there will be a $286,000 shortage in the fund balance of the Water Department. Bill Davenport, Director of Municipal Water District No. 4 of Orange County requested verification of the 40$ increase in water rates that waa stated previously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 6-1-81 Mayor Sharp said that verification of the facts would have to be made at the next meeting when the Finance Director would be present. Mr. Davenport responded that the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California actually has a decrease in rates for this year if you properly utilize interruptable pricing, and the Municipal Water District of Orange County does not pass on any increase so actually the overall wholesale rate of water to Tustin should be less than for the past year. He wanted to make sure that the facts were straight because he did not want the Metropolitan Water District to be held responsible for the increase in rates. There being no further comments or objections, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this hearing to the June 15, 1981 meeting. Councilman Saltarelli suggested that staff could look at some alternative sources of raising revenue as opposed to general rate increases. Motion carried 5-0. 107 PII. PQffi.IC CONCBIaIS 1. SIS STAR CABL$VISION ANR'ffi]NA LOCATION The following people spoke in opposition to the Beneta Way loca- tion for the Six Star Cablevision antenna: Jim Baker, a Tustin resident; Gloria J. Alm, 17932 Lucero Way, Tustin; Bob Davis, Lucero Way, Tustin; George Banks, a Tustin resident; and Tom McDuff, 14521 Livingston, County area. There were approximately 25 people in the audience who were opposed to this location and a petition in opposition with approximately 80 signatures was presented to the Council. The opponents requested response to the following concerns at the June 15, 1981 Council meeting: 1. Address the landscaping and drainage project that was promised over 8 years ago; 2. Zoning aspects of Six Star's choice of location; 3. Can a private company erect industrial equipment in a residential area; 4. Does Council consider it ethical to support a private company such as Six Star Cablevision with public land; 5. Ability of the City to erect bars in between bars to make it impossible for a small child to enter the drain- age area; 6. Creating an extreme attractive nuisance directly across from a Tustin school. 7. Possibility of Six Star locating the antenna in an industrial area where they would buy or lease land and pay the appropriate taxes. Dr. Fleagle, Planning Consultant, explained that before Six Star could be granted permission to use any site, a Public Hearing would be required, with notification to ali rocidents within 300 feet of the site, and an environmental analysis would have to be made for any site. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 6-1-81 Council concurred that staff should prepare answers to these questions for the next meeting. 53 VIII. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODQCTION AND ADOPTION AS IIRGffidC'Y ORDINANCE 1. ORDINANCE NO. 852 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Cali- fornia, REVISING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS AS AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordi- nance No. 852 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 852 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 852 be introduced. Carried 5-0. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 852 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 852 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 852 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: EDGAR, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI, SHARP NOES: NONE 100 I%. ORDI- '~ NANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDINANCE NO. 847 Y An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO SUBDIVISIONS The staff report was given by Dr. Fleagle, Planning Consultant. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 847 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 847 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 847 be adopted. In response to Councilman Saltarelli's question, Dr. Fleagle said that there would be no changes in processing a map. Mr. Saltarelli said that he would like to see anything that changes. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: EDGAR, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI, SHARP NOES: NONE 99 2. ORDINANCE NO. 848 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, Califor- nia, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE TO CREATE AND ESTABLISH THE OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordi- nance No. 848 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 6-1-81 Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 848 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 848 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: EDGAR, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI, SHARP NOES: NONE 35 3. ORDINANCE NO. 849 An Ordinance of the City of Tustin AMENDING SECTION F3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 835 ADOPTING THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TO PROVIDE FEES FOR MICROFILMING OF BUILDING RECORDS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 849 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 849 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 849 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: EDGAR, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI, SHARP NOES: NONE 30 50 4. ORDINANCE NO. 850 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, AMENDING SECTION 1534 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE PERTAINING TO APPLICATION FEES TO THE LICENSE AND PERMIT BOARD Zt was moved by Hoestere~ seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 850 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following the reading of the title of Ordinance No. 850 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 850 be passed and adopted. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: EDGAR, HOESTEREY, KENNEDY, SALTARELLI, SHARP NOES: NONE 31 50 5. ORDINANCE NO. 846 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, APPROVING THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM C-1 TO CG DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF RED HILL AVENUE AND NISSON ROAD Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that the owner of the property to be rezoned, Mr. Tutt, has requested a chance to address the Council. He will respond in writing. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue Ordinance No. 846 to the June 15, 1981 meeting for Mr. Tutt's written response. Carried 5-0. 110 %. OLD BQSINBSS 1. RBSOLDTION NO. 81-55 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND OWNERSHIP OF LOW-RENT HOUSING PROJECTS, OF NOT TO EXCEED 58 OF THE TOTAL DWELLING UNITS IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND APPROVING THE FORM OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE ORANGE HC~j1QTetr A11TUr'i`='m' °1w AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 6-1-81 Mike Brotemarkle, Community Development Director, reported that each project for low cost housing would have to be adopted by the City Council. He said this resolution and agreement allows the County to act on our behalf and to act immediately if we have an application for low cost housing. ' It was _moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to adopt Resolution No. 81-55. Councilman Saltarelli urged the Council not to pass this. He said it was obvious that Proposition "X" that was placed before the voters was different from what we were told. It was to be a referendum granting the City of Tustin and the voters the right to vote on any low cost housing. This resolution states we have a need for low-rent housing which we do not. We have housing stock in all ranges. We have higher percent of apartment and low rent housing than most any city. We have not had any trouble in bringing in housing for senior citizens on our own merit. There is no reason to sign an outside agency to have control over our housing. Councilwoman Kennedy asked if this was a commitment or is it just an opportunity to get a project for senior citizens. Mr. Brotemarkle responded that this would not take away the City's ability to pick and choose a particular project. The County of Orange Housing Authority already acts as our agent in regard to some housing issues. The cooperative agreement would allow them to continue to act as our agent if we choose to select a site and a developer and there are funds available. 1 Following further discussion, the motion was defeated 1-4, ~ Edgar, Hoesterey, Saltarelli and Sharp opposed. 45 67 ; 81 3. AL~IARD OF BID - COLUl~OS TQSTIN PARRSITE PARKING LOT Councilwoman Kennedy was concerned about the condition of the area around Beneta Way and the park. She suggested this be included in an overall plan for the area. Councilman Edgar agreed that it is necessary to have a total plan for the area but felt this portion should be approved now as inflation would cause the cost to be more in 6 months or a year. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to award the bid to Allied Sprinkler Company, Inc. of Anaheim, in the amount of $29,973.00 and authorize a supplemental budget appropriation of $10,000 from general fund monies for this project. Councilwoman Kennedy stated that she could not support the motion because she felt we should take care of upgrading the area of Beneta Way. She asked if there would be any budget problem of trimming trees and eliminating weeds to improve the area. Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, responded that this could be accomplished through day-to-day maintenance. There is a disease that affects the Orange trees but the area can be cleaned up within our operational budget. The motion carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed. 77 %I. NEW B[1SINESS 1. PARKING PROHIBITION - 16561 ALLIANCE AVffidIIE The City Engineer reported that he had received another request from an apartment owner since this report was submitted and he expects additional requoo}s in the near future. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 6-1-81 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the installation of the following signing on the northerly side of Alliance Avenue and that warnings be issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after the sign installation: "NO PARKING, 6:00 AM TO NOON, THURSDAY, STREET SWEEPING." Carried 5-0. 75 2. AWARD OF BID - MC FADDSN AVffi~QE STORM DRAIN NO. lA AND MAIN STREBP STORM DRAIN NO. 1B The City Engineer reported that the low bid was $167,266 for the storm drains. To bring the Council up to date on comparing budget figures, in addition to this cost, we have previously expended $18,000 in design engineering costs on the 2 projects and we anticipate an additional $10,000 if we have to utilize a consultant for the construction staking. It is necessary to put in a water valve in the Santa Ana water system which is approxi- mately $3,000. The total project cost would be approximately $198,266 instead of $211,200. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to award the contract for subject project to Mike Prlich & Sons of El Monte, California, in the amount of $167,266.00. Carried 5-0. 91 3. REQQIRffi~NTS OF SWIlQ~iING POOL CODE It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to advertise a hearing for the purpose of amending Ordinance No. 835 pertaining to the construction of swimming pools as fol- lows: 1) Delete the requirement for "key" locked gates; 2) Establish a performance criteria for soil preparation under decking; 3) Establish a minimum three (3) foot walkway require- ment around a pool; and 4) Establish a performance criteria for deck drainage. Carried 5-0. 30 4. FOOTHILL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR Dr. Fleagle, Planning Consultant, reported that a presentation was given at the Planning Agency meeting and staff was requested to respond to the presentation. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to authorize the Mayor to sign the prepared letter of Council concerns to the Board of Supervisors, attached to the June 1, 1981 staff report. Carried 5-0. 101 5 . PERS(kdNNEL VACANCIES - MAINTS[dANCB WORKER I , RECORDS (Z..BR1C _AND COl4~IDNICATIONS OFFICER It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to authorize filling the position of Maintenance Worker I in the Tustin Water Service and the positions of Records Clerk and Communications Officer in the Police Department. Carried 5-0. 79 %II. OTHER BIISINBSS 1. GLEAN IIP OF AREA OF BSNETA WAY Councilwoman Kennedy asked if Council did not want to give some direction to staff regarding the conditions in the area of Beneta Way. She felt this area was in very poor condition and the City should not wait six months or a year to improve it. Council concurred to cleaning up of the weeds and staff to respond to the areas of concern at the June 15th meeting which were requested by the residents. 108 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 6-1-81 2. TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT CANDIDATES Mayor Sharp reported that he had received correspondence from several Mayors regarding sponsoring members of their Council for the Transportation District opening. Council concurred that each Councilperson should contact Dick Edgar to advise him of any choices they might have prior to the June 18th meeting. 101 3. ITEM PRICING RBSOLDTION Council concurred to agendize a resolution supporting item pric- ing for the next meeting. 61 4. DNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS Council concurred not to pay dues to the United States Confer- ence of Mayors . ~ 3 5. PROCLpiMATION TO A NATIONAL GROIIP Council concurred to decline a proclamation to a National group for Honor America. 84 6. THANKS FOR CONSTRIICTIVB CRITICISM Councilman Saltarelli thanked Henry Gankema for his valid con- structive criticism at the June 1 meeting on the Ordinance regarding swimming pool requirements. ~ %III. ADJOIIIai- MSNT It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn at 9:23 P.M. to a Budget Workshop on June 8, 1981 at 7:00 P.M., and thence to the next regular meeting on June 15, 1981. Carried 5-0. MAYOR ~. TY CLERK