HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 208410
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
~ RESOLUTION NO. 2084
,. ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE
PROPERTIES AT 1252 IRVINE BOULEVARD
(ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 103-626-26 & 103-626-27)
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That Section 65356.1 of the Government Code of the
State of California provides that when it is deemed to
be in the public interest, the legislative body may
amend a part of the General Plan.
B. That in accordance with Section 65356 of the
Government Code of the State of California, a public
hearing was duly advertised and held on February 28,
1983 to 6onsider General Plan Amendment 83-1(B) to
reclassify the parcel of land at 1252 Irvine Boulevard
from the Single-Family classification to the
Professional (office) classification.
C. That the Planning Commission did by the adop~cion of
Resolution No. 2079 recommend to the City Council that
General Plan Amendment 83-1(B) be approved.
D. That the City Council, at a duly advertised public
hearing, referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission to consider the addition of the undeveloped
parcel immediately east of the lot that was considered
in Resolution No. 2079.
E. That a second public hearing before the Planning
Commission was duly advertised and held on March 28,
1983 to reconsider General Plan Amendment 83-1(B) to
include both parcels of land located at what is commonly
known at 1252 Irvine Boulevard.
F. That a Negative Declaration has been applied for to
comply with. the California Environmental Quality Act.
G. That the change in classification of the additional
lot would be in the public interest and not detrimental
to the welfare of the public or the surrounding property
owners based on the following findings:
1. That because of the nature of the surrounding uses,
and because the property fronts along Irvine
Boulevard, a professional land use designation is
justifiable and more appropriate than single-family
res i denti al.
3
10
11
12
13
__. 14
-15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution NC .....2084
March 28, 1983
Page 2
2. That the Professional classification will minimize
the impacts of potential future development as it
would affect residents of the adjacent single-family
homes.
H. That the adoption of this resolution supercedes and
replaces Resolution No. 2079.
II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City
Council approval of General Plan Amendment 83-1(B) to
reclassify subject parcels (A.P. #103-626-26 &
#103-626-27) from the Single-Family Residential to the
Professional (office) Classification.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a re~g~ar meetinA of the Tustin Planning
Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1983.
J"4n~ f, Hester
Recording Secretary
James B. ISharp, Chairma~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, JANET HESTER, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the
Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Tustin, California; that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning
Commission, held on the~~ day of..'~~ , 19~.~.
Janet Hest~r
Tustin Planning Agency