Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 02-065 RESOLUTION NO. 02-65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ADOPTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 5473 ET SEQ OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A REPORT RELATIVE TO PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY RECEIVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES, DETERMINING THE CHARGES FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION TO BE ASSESSED AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND AS THEY APPEAR ON THE CURRENT ASSESSMENT ROLL The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. That proceeding were duly instituted, conducted and completed pursuant to provisions of Section 5473 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. A. A written report dated July, 2002, containing a description of each parcel of real property receiving solid waste collection services and facilities and the amount of the charge proposed to be levied upon each parcel for the collection of solid waste for the fiscal year 2002-2003 was prepared and filed with the City Clerk of the City of Tustin on July 3, 2002.. B. That a Public Hearing to hear and consider all objections or protests, if any, to the aforesaid report and proposed charges was duly set for July 15, 2002 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chamber of the City of Tustin at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. C. Said hearing was duly noticed as required by law, by publication once each week for two successive weeks on July 4, 2002 and July 11, 2002 in the Tustin News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Tustin. D. At the foresaid time and place the duly noticed hearing was held and all persons who were present were heard and all comments, objections, and protests to the aforesaid report and proposed charges were duly heard and considered by the City Council. E. 'The charges proposed in the aforesaid report are fair and reasonable, are commensurate with the services provided, and the charge therefore should properly be collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, ger~eral taxes. Resolution No. 02-65 Page 2 II. The City Council hereby elects to have the charges set forth in the aforesaid report collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with and not separately from its general taxes, and hereby authorizes that such charges be collected on the tax roll, as all prescribed to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 5473 et seq. III. The Resolution shall be effective following its adoption by a two-thirds vote of the members of the City Council and shall remain in force and effect and said charges shall be collected in the manner as foresaid for the year 2002-2003 and for each subsequent year as authorized by the hereinabove referenced section of the Health and Safety Code. IV. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Auditor of the County of Orange, together with a copy of the hereinabove described report, and a statement endorsed thereon over her signature that the said report has been finally adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, held on the 5th day of August, 2002. J e~(y~V/l'/I,l,l~m a s, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk City of Tustin RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE )SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) RESOLUTION NO. 02-65 I, PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, hereby certifies that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; and that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 02- 65 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 5 day of August, 2002, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Thomas, Worley, Bone, Doyle, Kawashima None None None Pamela Stoker, City Clerk