The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 12-04 Jan-June 2012 Administrative Budgetw SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 12 -04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING AN ADMINSTRATIVE BUDGET PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 34177 OF PART 1.85 OF THE DISSOLUTION ACT The City of Tustin acting as Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ") was established as a community redevelopment agency that was previously organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq. ( " CRL "), and previously authorized to transact business and exercise 4 the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City of Tustin ("City"); and B. Assembly Bill x1 26 added Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health & Safety Code, which laws cause the dissolution and wind down of all redevelopment agencies ( "Dissolution Act "); and C. On December 29, 2011, in the petition California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, Case No. 5194861, the California Supreme Court upheld the Dissolution Act and thereby all redevelopment agencies in California were dissolved as of and on February 1, 2012 under the dates in the Dissolution Act that were reformed and extended thereby ( "Supreme Court Decision "); and D. The Agency is now a dissolved community redevelopment agency pursuant to the Dissolution Act; and E. By a Resolution No. 11 -71 considered and approved by the City Council at an open public meeting on September 20, 2011, the City chose to become and serve as the "successor agency" to the dissolved Agency under the Dissolution Act; and F. As of and on and after February 1, 2012, the City serves as the "Successor Agency" will perform its functions as the successor agency under the Dissolution Act to administer the enforceable obligations of the Agency and otherwise unwind the Agency's affairs, all subject to the review and approval by a seven- member Oversight Board formed thereunder; and Resolution No. 12 -04 Page 1 of 3 G. Health and Safety Code Section 34177 0), as modified by the Supreme Court decision requires the Successor Agency to prepare a proposed administrative budget covering the period from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 and submit it to the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency for approval; and H. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177 (k), upon approval of the administrative budget by the oversight board, the Successor Agency is required to provide administrative cost estimates, from the approved administrative budget, that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Fund, to the County of Orange Auditor-Controller for each fiscal year covered by the administrative budget; and I. On March 13, 2012 the Oversight Board to the Successor Agency reviewed, approved and authorized the Successor Agency to adopt an administrative budget pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177 0). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL SERVING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this resolution by this reference, and constitute a material part hereof. Section 2. Approval of Proposed Administrative Budge The Successor Agency hereby approves and adopts the proposed administrative budget covering the period from February 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012, in substantially the form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 34177. Section 3. Transmittal of Proposed Administrative Budget. The Executive Director on behalf of the Successor Agency or his authorized designees is hereby authorized and directed to take any action necessary to carry out the purposes of this Resolution and comply with applicable law regarding the proposed administrative budget, including submitting the proposed administrative budget and the administrative cost estimates from the approved administrative budget, that are to be paid from property tax revenues deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund, to the County of Orange Auditor Controller. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. N Resolution No. 12-04 Page 2 of 3 Section 5. The City Clerk an behalf of the Successor Agency shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED an the 20th day of March, 2012. ATTEST: CITY OF TUSTIN SERVING AS SUCCESSOR. NCY e ~ }fi Jahn Nielsen, Mayer on behalf of the Successor Agency Pamela Staker, City Clerk an behalf of the Successor Agency STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss. CITY OF TUSTIN } 1, PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk of the City of Tustin, acting as the Successor Agency for the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City of Tustin, acting as the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency at its regular meeting held on the 20th day of March, 2012, and that it was sa adopted by the fallowing vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Nielsen, Murray, Amante, Gavello, Gomez (5) None (0) None (0) None (0) Pamela Staker, City Clerk, City of Tustin, on behalf of the Successor Agency Resolution 12-04 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A (Attached Administrative Budget and Administrative Cost Estimates to be Paid from Property Tax Revenues Deposited in the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund) Object Position to Admin Total FY- 3 Estimated Property Tax allocated to Successor Agency Less Pass-Throughs 17,654,929 4 Administrative Cost Allowance for FY 11/12 5% $ 882,746 882,746 ESTIMATED EXPENSES EMPLOYEE DETAILS Object Position Fiscal Year-TOtaIlPercentto Admin TotaIFY-Admin Februarythru 1 5000 Assistant Executive Director $ 109 529 30% $ 32 859 27,383 2 5000 Finance Director 232 809 11% 25 609 11 640 3 5000 Pro ram Mana er #1 160 840 25% 40 210 16 755 4 5000 Pro ram Mana er #2 157 027 25% 39 257 16 355 5 5000 Pro'ect Mana er 123,778 0% 6 5000 Mana ementAnal st 86609 0% 7 5000 Administrative Secrets 73,522 100% 73,522 30,635 Sub-Total Wages, Benefits and WC: $ 944,114 $ 211,457 $ 102,768 OTHER Object Code Item Total During Fiscal Year 2011 12 Percent to Admin Total FY -Admin Costs February thru June 2012 5 Months 1 6147 Bank Service Charges 3,000 100% 3,000 3,000 2 6355 Telephone 4,800 100% 4,800 2,035 3 6400 Office Supplies 5,200 100% 5,200 1,890 4 6415 Mail and Postage Service 1,600 100% 1,600 510 5 6420 Printing 9,000 100% 9,000 1,300 6 6710 Meetings (staff) 5,400 100% 5,400 1,040 7 6715 Training Expense 3?i0D 100% 3,400 800 8 6730 Membership/Subscriptions 11,500 100% 11,500 0 9 6840 Vehicle Mileage 200 100% 200 100 10 6845 Vehicle Lease Equipment 6,800 100% 6,800 0 11 6848 IT Support Services 36,500 100% 36,500 15,208 Sub-Total Admin Cost Allowances: $ 87,400 $ 87,400 $ 25,883 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT COSTS BASED ON COST ALLOCATION (ATTACHED) Object Code Item Total During Fiscal Year 2011 12 Total FY -Admin Costs February thru June 2012 5 Months i City Administrative Support Costs based on Cost Allocation 814,448 52% 424,995 $ 424,995 CITY ATTOR NEY (contract services) Object Code Description of Services Total During Fiscal Year 2011/12 Percent to Admin Total FY -Admin Costs February thru June 2012(5 Months) 6017 City Attorney's Office -Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart (Including: StradBng Yocca Carlson & Rauth; Remy, Thomas, Moose & Manley, Waters & Company, Jeanette Justus). This does not include legal services from the following firms that are associated with project costs: 1) Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac LLP; 2)Cappello and Noel LLP, and 3) Kutak Rock. $ 400,000 75% $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Sub-Total City Attorney: $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 SPECIFIC SERVICES (3rd Revised EOPS and Draft ROPS) Object Code Description Total During Fiscal Year 2011/12 Percent to Admin Total FY -Admin Costs February thrU June 2012 (5 Months) 1 6315 Lease of Office Space $ 49,47 100% $ 49,497 19,100 2 6014 Auditing5ervices $ 10,~G0 100% $ 10,000 10,000 Sub-Total Specific Services: $ 49,497 $ 49,497 $ 29,100 TOTAL ADMI NISTRATIVE SERVICE COSTS Percent to Admin TotaIFY-Admin Costs FebruarythruJune 2012(5 Months) TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE COSTS $ 1,073,349 $ 882,746 BUDGES- REVEh1UlE5 QSUu3iadU5)/GxPIE~SES (DErOCdT) ~_ - - _ $ 4 S.. 4 O 4 V) O 24: ;1. 00 GOS 9q 9q , a cc Q a 00 CN ss Is 00 00 o 00 kn 00 v o v ° t4;;O cd M cn 3 o 40, 0 0 u -Ci r bD 'n 0 cn $5. Cd 0 m "a cn 72 N p vi 0p 00 o u COS m Go�l r' rs o a) u Os o to r. GOC, u 4� 'It 0 bA a U U) :3 O 7:j 0 cn cn O o o o cn ci ID cd bA cn cd cd a = 4 a) V , C,3 "o 0. cd 0. r -0 0 rz In cd 0 14Z Cn Ly ci 0 cl $.. U) cd Q. 0 U C.) M u �= CA r. u 0 bb 0 0 Q + C8 4 0 0 , O 0 C's CA 0 0. > 0 Cd Q CA — 4� U) Cd Cj 0 0 0 cri 0. Cd cd U , Cd 4-r to 0 to - 0 !z to - - a < v > Q O o. 0 cl q. U N Cd o Cd cd a v° tis o 0 "'cI 0" v) "0 -0 0 4 S.. 4 O 4 V) O 24: ;1. 00 GOS 9q 9q , a cc Q a 00 CN ss Is 00 00 00 kn 00 6R 6F3 M 00 Gs *. I I 11 I I 00 00 m N p vi 0p 00 o u COS m Go�l r' rs Os u u *. I I 11 I I O O O P6o ra CO U u u u O O O P6o ra CO