HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 1986 04 21 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 21, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 8:43 p,m. by Chairman Saltarelli in the
:~it~Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present: Donald J, Saltarelli, Chairman
Ronald B. Hoesterey, Chairman Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
John Kel 1 y
Ursula E. Kennedy
Agency Members Absent: None
Others Present: William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Robert S. Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Edward M. Knight, Senior Planner
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Services
~ Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent
Approximately 50 in the audience
3. DESIGN REVIEW FOR USE PERMIT 86-15, MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER -
RESOLUTION NO, RDA 86-5
The Senior Planner presented the staff report as contained in the inter-
com dated April 21, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Depart-
ment.
Agency member Saltarelli recommended replacing planter boxes with tree
wells in the parking lot.
In response to Mr. Edgar, Ron Paige, project architect, stated that the
timetable to complete construction drawings for submission to the City for
final check is within 3-1/2 months of Agency approval to proceed.
James Wilmoth, no address given, spoke in opposition to the Multipurpose
Senior Citizen Center, stating that it would get greater use as a com-
munity center. Mr. Wilmoth expressed unhappiness that park improvements
will be torn down to facilitate the building.
Edmund F. Shaheen, Clover Drive, spoke in favor of the Center, stating
that seniors deserve this type of facility.
Richard Vining, 400 West Main Street, stated he was not opposed to the
center itself, but objected to the location of the center. He recommended
that it be moved southerly so as not to reduce the size of the park.
Chairman Saltarelli clarified that the center is designed for general pur-
pose use as well, i.e., banquets, town hall meetings, and not solely for
senior citizen activities. The City Council and Steering Committee
reviewed various proposals, and what is before the Agency this evening is
what the consultants and committee have agreed upon.
Victor Anderson, Jr., owner of Tustin Blacksmith Shop, spok~ in opposition
to the center's location in Peppertree Park. He felt the matter should
have been placed on the ballot.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 86-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SITE AND ELEVATION
PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED MULTIPURPOSE SENIOR CENTER AT 200 SOUTH "C" STREET.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES
Page 2, 4-21-86
Agency members spoke in support of the project. After further discussion
and public input, the motion carried 5-0. 60
4. MAIN STREET & PACIFIC STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
As recommended in the inter-com dated April 15, 1986, prepared by.the
Public Works Department, Engineering Division, it was moved b~/Edgar'sec-
onded by Kennedy, to authorize a supplemental 1985-86 budget appropriation
in the amount of $99,000 for traffic signal installation at Main and ~--
Paci fi c Streets.
Agency member Kelly wondered if something less expensive could be.done to
slow traffic, such as stop signs. Mr. Edgar felt that the traffic signal
is the most direct and effective method to slow down traffic.
Lyn A. Van Dyken, 235 South "A" Street, recommended installation of stop
signs in the interest of saving money.
Chairman Saltarelli pointed out some negative factors of stop signs, such
as noise, impeded ability to control timing of traffic, and safety
aspects.
Ms. Van Dyken felt residents on Main would endure the noise of cars stop-
ping/starting to be able to exit their driveways. She was in favor of the
stop signs, and suggested flashing warning lights for drivers traveling
easterly on the freeway overpass.
Mrs. Kennedy suggested that members of the newly-organized TRUST (Tustin
Residents United to Save Tustin) group make an appointment with the Direc-~
tor of Public Works and Chief of Police to discuss area residents' feel'
ings on the matter. The Agency then could proceed with the residents'
best interests i n mind.
Ms. Van Dyken was receptive to Mrs. Kennedy's suggestion. Chai'rman
Saltarelli suggested that the Agency could proceed with the motion, but :
delay its implementation until residents have had an opportunity~to meet
with staff.
The motion carried 4-1, Kelly opposed. 94
5.. OTHER BUSINESS
None.
6. ADJOURNMENT
At 9:35 p,m, the meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on
May 5, 1986, by unanimous informal consent,
?