Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 1982 04 05 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA April 5, 1982 1, CALL TO ORDER ~e meeting was called to order by Chaiman Sharp at 3:~5 p.m. in the City Co~cil Cheers, 300 Centennial Way, ~stin, California. 2. ROLL CALL ! Agency Meters Present: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp Agency M~ers ~sent: None Others Present: J~es G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City ~ager ~ry E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Com. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of P~lic Works Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen ~ite, Com~ity Services Director Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant Jeff Davis, Planning Aide Approximately 10 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved b~ Hoesterse, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the March JS, ~982, re~lar meeting. Carried 5-0. 4. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS - EL CAMINO REAL & SIXTH STREET As reco~ended in the report dated March 25, J982, prepared by the City Engineer, it was mved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the follo~ ing resolution: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 82-33 - A Resolution of THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOP- ment Agency of THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF EL CAMINO REAL AND SIXTH STREET Motion carried 5-0. 94 5. AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN FINANCIAL CONSULTANT ~e Executive Director presented the staff report and recomendation. P~s~nt to the reco~endation contained in his report dated April 2, J982, it was moved by Hoesterse, seconded by Edgar, to authorize retention of ~e rim of Katz, Hollis, Coren a Associates, Inc., ~s ~geles, for the p~se of preparing a financial plan for the Redevelo9ment Agency. In response to Mr. Edgar, the Executive Director indicated that a repr~ sentative of the consultant fim will be present at the next Agency meet- ing to provide an overview on ~e scope of work and methodology ~d allow fo~ Agency input. ~e Executive Director responded to Mrs. Kennedy that staff did check with cities ~e rim has worked with, ~ey have ~ exten- sive track record in redevelopment, and are one of the foremost consul- tants in the field. Motion carried 5-0. 44 6. AGENCY CONCERNS In response to ~s. Kennedy, the Executive Director reported that staff has started on ~e EIR for ~e Edinger Overpass on a preliminary basis and will be utilizing some outside traffic engineering analysis. Staff's goal is to get ~e project funded by Dece~er. Responsibility for the project will be a joint effort on behalf of the Co~unity Develo~ent Director, the City ~gineer, ~d the Planning Consultant, with ~e Planning Consul- tant principally responsible for coordinating the focused EIR. ~e City ~nager ~inted out that if there are no state and/or federal monies available for the project, the City can look at other options for funding the project, i.e., ~rough a ~nd progr~ of the Agency. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 4-5-82 7. ADJOURNMENT : It was moved b~ Hoestere~, seconded bl~ Saltarelli, to adjourn at 3:22 p.m. to the next regular meeting on April 19, 1982. Carried 5-0.