Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 1982 06 07 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF · THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUne 7, 1982 1. CALL. TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Edgar at 3:17 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. ~ 2o ROLL CALL Agency Members Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Agency Members Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Ronald Nault, Finance Director Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Royleen White, CommUnity Services Director Approximately 10 in the audience 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the minutes of May 17, 1982. Carried 5-0. 4. REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT MAIN AND "B" STREETS Bob Ledendecker, City Engineer, reported that this intersection missed meeting the warrant requirements by 75% and he recommended that no action be taken. CoUncilwoman Kennedy reported that she had spent some time on Main Street and was alarmed at the travel speeds and she requested enforcement by the Police Department. Mayor Edgar pointed out that staff has recommended in the past that the 25 mph limit be changed to 35 mph so that radar could be used. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that no action be taken at this time and that another traffic survey be taken when construction at that corner is completed. Carried 5-0. 94 5. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 82-4 - A Resolution of the Tustin Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EL CAMIN0 REAL/MAIN STREET IMPROVEMB~TS AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS The City Engineer reported that the number of parking spaces are staying the same and that there are no areas projecting out into the street. The plans will be complete in a few days and construction should be completed in mid November. He introduced Mr. Fisher, the consultant. Mr. Fisher, consultant, explained that the landscape improvements consist of paving (brick look alike) texture that will have a slight coarseness but would not prohibit pushing strollers. There will be planting at the bus stops with benches, newspaper racks and bicycle racks. The Pine trees atthe south end of the project will be replaced with flowering trees. The F~cu~ree~!lw~ll~be pruned ashweLl-asjputting inlaba=rier ~totrootsbreak- ing the sidewalk. We will put iron tree gates around the tree:! wells. There will be general upgrading to the landscaping but not as much as in the first plans submitted. Most of the concrete paving will be replaced and any drainage problems will be addressed. CoUncilman Greinke reported that the Historical Society has asked for a bench in front of their establishment to draw attention to their office. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to adopt Resolution No. RDA 82-4. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 2, 6-7-82 In response to Councilman Hoesterey's desire to see the final proposal, Mr. Ledendecker suggested that he could bring a set of plans that would be 98% complete to the evening meeting. Councilwoman Kennedy withdrew her motion and moved, seconded b~'Greinke, to continue this item to the 7:30 p.m. meeting. Carried 5-0. 95 6. AGENCY C0NCERNS MR. GREINKE'S STATUS ON THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mr. Greinke asked the City Attorney to explain his position on the Redevelopment Agency. Attorney Rourke explained that Mr. Greinke did not want to be in a position Where he-could notacquire-.prdperty in the Redevelopment Agency areas. As long as the City Council has, by majority action, established itself as the body of the Redevelopment Agency, Mr. Greinke is automatically a member. The only other alternative would be for the Council to appoint residents of the City as the governing board, none of whom could be Councilpersons. In the case of Mr. Schuster, when he was a Councilperson, he understood that he could not acquire any property in the Redevelopment Agency. He already owned property in the Redevelopment Agency and he chose to not participate, even though he was a member~ Mr. Greinke could choose to not participate. Mr. Greinke stated that he would serve on the Redevelopment Agency as a participating member. 81 7. ADJOURNMENT - It was moved b~ Kennedy, seconded by Boesterey, to adjourn to the 7:30 p.m. meeting of the Redevelopment Agency. Carried 5-0. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUne 7, 1982 7:30 p.m. 1 · CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by-Chairman Edgar at 8:46.p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. 2. R0LL CALL Agency Members present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy Agency:Members Absent: Saltare~li Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Ronald Nault, Finance Director Charles Thayer, Chief of Police Approximately 10 in the audience AGENDA ORDER 5. CONTINUED FROM AFTERNOON MEETING RESOLUTION NO. RDA 82-4 - A Resolution of the Tustin, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin, California, APPROVING pLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EL CAMINO REAL/MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS A Recess was declared at 8:07 p.m. to review plans. The Redevelopmerit Agency reconvened at 8:21 p.m. It Was .mowed by Greinke, seconded by Eoesterey(, tO.,OdRBt_,~9lution No. RDA 82-4- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES Page 3, 6-7-82 Mr. Hoesterey requested that the motion be amended that the Redevelopment Agency review the type of trees that would go in at the North and South ends of E1 Camino Real. The motion was amended by Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Res~ lution No. RDA 82-4 and that the Redevelopment Agency would review the type of trees that go in at the North and South ends of E1 Camino Real. Carried ~0, Saltarelli absent. 95 3. ADJOURNMENT - It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Greink~, to adjourn to a Workshop to review status of South/Central Redevelop ment Project Area and to the next regular meeting on June 21, 1982. Carried 4-0, Saltarelli absent.