HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA MINUTES 1978 09 18 COUNCIL MINUTES
9-18-78, P~age 7
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to the
Redevelopment Agency regular meeting at 8:30 P.M. Carried unanimously.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
September 18, 1978
1. Meeting called to order at 8:30 P.M.
2. Present: Members: Welsh, SharP, Kennedy, Saltarelli
Absent: Members: None
3. Approval of Minutes
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Sh~ to approve the minutes
of the September 5, 1978 meeting. Carried 3-0, Kennedy abstaining.
4. SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY ON EASTERLY SIDE OF NEWPORT AVENUE, SOUTHERLY
OF WALNUT AVENUE
It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kenned~ that the City Attorney
prepare the necessary documents for the sale of the subject property
and authorize the Chairman to execute a grant deed for the sale of
said property at the earliest date possible. 'Motion carried unanimousl~.
5. It was moved by Sharp, seconded by Kennedy to adjourn the Redevelopment
Agency meeting at 8:31 P.M. and thence to the next regularly scheduled
Redevelopment Agency meeting. Carried unanimously.
CORDING SECRETARY
I.
PUBLIC
CONCERNS
II.
OLD
BUS INESS
MEETING OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
RECONVENED AT 8:30 P.M.
September 18, 1978
Mr. Richard B. Edgar, 13622 Loretta Driv~ asked about the pace of develop-
ment of the County's commitment to widen a very short parcel, of Bryan
Avenue between Red Hill and Browning.
Mr. Ledendecker responded that he did not know the County's schedule but
he would check into it.
Mr. Edgar suggested that we ask for a precise time.
Dan Blankenship said the County has adopted their budget now and we should
be able to get an answer from them.
2. POLICY ON FEES, CLASSIFICATIONS AND WAIVERS - CLIFTON C. MILLER
COMMUNITY CENTER
Mrs. Kennedy had several questions regarding the use and fees of the
Community Center, the first of which was perhaps we should have a new
classification that would allow local businesses with non-local owners
to have the same rights as residents.
After some discussion, it was the consensus of opinion of the Council
that local businesses with non-local owners should have the same rights
and fees for the CCMCC as residents. However, this should not apply to
fees for recreation classes.