The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC RES 4213A I IN WA W&WWWOKI RM Ron OR The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Code Amendment 2012-04 was filed by Mr. Joseph Haikal requesting an amendment to the parking code allowing the child day care center to have an optional parking ratio of one (1) parking space per employee plus one (1) parking space per every ten (10) children with adequate drop-off/pick-up area. B. That the proposed minor code amendment is regulatory in nature and would provide for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards for day care centers C. That the City of Tustin has a substantial interest in protecting public EISNER: health and safety, and harmony of the community by providing 11171 1 strengthened and clarified off-street parking requirements and standards, particularly for day care centers. D. That the proposed amendment is considered a "project" subject to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). That an Initial Study has been prepared in conjunction with Code Amendment 2012-03 (Parking Code Update) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the project and concluded that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared. E. That a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was published and the Negative Declaration and Initial Study were made available for a 20-day public review and comment period from November 22, 2012, to December 11, 2012, in compliance with Sections 15072 and 15105 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. That a public hearing was duly noticed, called, and held for Code Amendment 2012-03 on December 11, 2012, by the Planning Commission. G. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Tustin General Plan Circulation Element in that it complies with the following goals and policies: Exhibit A Resolution No, 4213 CA 2012-04 Page 2 a. Goal 7: Provide for well-designed and convenient parking facilities. b. Policy 7.2: Provide sufficient off-street parking for all land uses. c. Policy 7.3: Encourage the efficient use of parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities, smaller vehicles and other provisions to improve the effectiveness of City codes and ordinances. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Negative Declaration for Code Amendment 2012-04 and adopt Ordinance No. 1425, amending various sections of Part 6 of Chapter 2 of Article 9 of the Tustin City Code related to off-street parking, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular meeting on the 11th day of December, 2012. 1>7 �61 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF TUSTIN 1, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting on the 11 th day of December, 2012. ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary &EV'E 4,(OZAK Chairperson hereby certify that I am the Planning California; that Resolution No. 4213 was of the Tustin Planning Commission, held IN- ON I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 921780 (714) 573-3100 Project Title: CODE AMENDMENT 2012-03 AND CODE AMENDMENT 2012-04 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Code Amendment 2012-03 and Code Amendment 2012-04 amend the Tustin City Code providing minor text amendments, clarification and minor updates to the parking ordinance. Project Proponent: The City of Tustin MBLead Agency Contact Person: Edmelynne flutter Telephone: (714) 573-3174 VMS, he, Cnmi-nnnitv Develnnmt-nt r)PnnrtmPnt hfAz onnt1iiotpt] nn lnitinl qtwix/ Fnr tlia n6n— —;—f Kill City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, and on the basis of that study hereby finds: M That there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. ❑ That potential significant effects were identified, but revisions have been included in the project plans and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur. Said Mitigation Measures are included in Attachment A of the Initial Study which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required. The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is attached and is on file at the Community Development Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this Negative Declaration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of Negative Declaration and extends for twenty (20) calendar days. Upon review by the Community Development Director, this review period may be extended if deemed necessary. REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 2012 Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 Project Title: Code Amendment 2012-03 (CA 2012-03) Parking Code Update Code Amendment 2012-04 (CA 2012-04) Amendment to Daycare Facility Parking Requirement Lead Agency: City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: Edmelynne Hutter uhf Project Location: Citywide Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Tustin General Plan Designation: All Zoning Designation: All Phone: (714) 573-3174 Project Description: Code Amendment 2012-03 and Code Amendment 20120-04 amend the Tustin City Code providing an updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments. The updated parking requirements will provide clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. Surrounding Uses: N/A North: East: South: West: Other public agencies whose approval is required: ❑ Orange County Fire Authority ❑ City of Irvine F-] Orange County Health Care Agency F-1 City of Santa Ana F-1 South Coast Air Quality Management District ❑ Orange County EMA ❑ Other CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below. F-1 Aesthetics ❑ Air Quality F-1 Cultural Resources F-1 Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Land Use/Planning El Noise F-1 Public Services ❑ Transportation/Traffic F-1 Mandatory Findings of Significance On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ Agriculture Resources Fj Biological Resources ❑ Geology/Soils [:] Hydrology/Water Quality Mineral Resources ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Recreation ❑ Utilities/Service Systems Z I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 6-01 ry ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. F-1 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. F-� I find that although the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described in the attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. F-1 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and no further documentation is required. Preparers Edmelynne V. Hinter Title Associate Plan-tier NOISE Date 11/22/2012 Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director ii w. 2 C/k20l2-03&CA28I2-U4 City ofTustin D EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Directions U Ahrief explanation is required for al I answers except "No answers that are adequately ' by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. \'No Impact" an is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not opp�o/y �� like the one involved (e.g,the jcct[oUaoutside ubmb rupture zooe). /\'��obn `aoov/crab' should be ' explained where it is based on p jcd-apeciGc factors and gcncoU standards (e.g., the project will noxczpoyo sensitive receptors nopollutants, huoud noaproject-specific screening analysis). 2) All auaneo must take into account the vvbo1e action involved, including off-site, on-site, oumuu|a1ive ��ot level, t indirect, di/cccooaboudon,and opem1ionalimpacts. ' ' 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made and EIR is required. � 4) Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of _ mitigation measures has reduced un effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" &ou"Less than Significant � " The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect tou less than significant kne|(nidgu1k/nnxuasoumfrum3cctooX\/U,"Earlier " m'ay becros+ --'---'. - 5\ ' Earlier analyses may bc used where, pursuant n/ the tiering, program ETQ,or other CG()Aprocess, un effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIRmnegative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3)(D). In this case, abrief discussion should identify the following: u) Godkr Analysis Uaed. Identify and state where they are available for review. N Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed ivao earlier documon( pursuant tu applicable legal and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated nr refined from the earlier document and the extent to v/bicb they address site-specific conditions for the project. @ Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references tu information sources for potential impacts (e.g` general plans, zoning mrdi . Reference to uprevioum|v prepared or outside documcutmbuuld` where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should bo attached, and other sources used orindividuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. sm 8> This iu only u suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies �� normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant tou project's environmental l in whatever format is selected. CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: PO®R o] the significance criteria ortbreaho)d,if any, used 0omvuhuUe each goo��n-and. LENIN b) h) � uu �=- 'ono�a�u�c identified, � uny, to reduce the b mztoienathnoaignificmooe. Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No [omuua: lnnyao1 Incorporated Impact Impact AESTHETICS. Would the project: u} Have u substantial adverse effect onuscenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, 0 including, but not limited to, tress, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? o) Substantially degrade the existing visual El Fl F1 character orquality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create u new source of substantial light mrglare El 0 0 which would adversely affect day ornighttime views in the area? Discussion: The proposed jcda vvUi provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amcndn000b for clarified io�p�o�ontahoo and onfbnoeno ' cf existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed ioconjunction with this project. m) No Impact. The City of Tustin General Plan encourages protection o[ scenic views and resources the Hillside Review prnucmm� monitoring and limiting development of Peters Canyon BJdom|bne consistent with the requirements ofthe East Tustin Specific Plan; and through imykrnentatinuofthe Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with this project. The parking ordinance nydu]eo du not exempt individual projects from review. |rupuctm related to any future project would he identified and evaluated io conjunction v/dbtbeapp|icab|capccificyluuocothcrreviu`vdoounoontaudnuuyheuukioct tu separate C|B(}/\ review. Therefore, these projects will not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vim1u. b) No Impact. The General Plan Circulation Element does not identify any State scenic highways within the City. Impacts related to any future project wou\dbc identified and evaluated in conjunction with the applicable specific plan or other review document and may be subject to separate C00/\ review. Therefore no impacts are forecast from the implementation o[ the proposed project. c No8mpc The o�kogmdnanmumndmntmdopaodonouxmpbdbdda 'es fomu*icw. Impacts '}u1ed 0/ any fu\urm ' 'su1 vvou\d hc idcnd�cd und cva uut�d bn c �uucdnn n�{b tho oppUcub� ron' cod� specific In CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin plan, or other review document and may be subject to separate CEQA review. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated from the implementation of the proposed projects, d) No Impact. The parking ordinance amendment and updates addresses lighting for parking lots and loading areas consistent with the Security Ordinance. A photometric plan and additional review would be required on a case-by-case basis for any lighting proposed, Therefore, there is no impact associated with these projects. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In r-1 determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, Lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? Potentially Significant Impact al Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated X ❑ ❑ r-1 ❑ Less Than Significant Impact a No Impact 101 El M ❑ F1 Discussion: The proposed project will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction �`_'with this project. CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin m) No DonRmot Since there are no improvements proposed in conjunction with this project, it will not rcooh in any impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, ov Farmland of Stu1ep/kic Importance (9urmluud). b) No Impact. Amendments to the parking ordinance will not result in conversion of farmland too use. There are oo areas m��u�lU��Adc��o��f�)��p A� Impacts related to uov future - project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction with each specific project. Therefore, no impacts are fbnuoustedto occur uuu result of implementation of the proposed projects. 6 No Impact. As described in Response D.b above, the proposed projects will not directly impact c« result inthe conversion of existing farmland uses to non-agricultural uses. Therefore, no impacts are forecasted to occur as a result of implementation of the proposed projects. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional nooaau/ou required Sources/ i City of Tustin General Plan (June l7. 2000 2. City ofTustin Zoning Code Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated DU. /\UR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established 6vthe applicable air quality management orair pollution control district may bc relied upon 10 make the following determinations. Would the a) Conflict with mobstruct Fl F-1 implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or El El El � contribute substantially toaoexisting or projected oirgnu|ityvio|utimu? C) RcmnU ioa cumulatively considerable El F-1 net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under au applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to El 7 substantial pollutant ? M CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 FROM@ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people" , City of Tustin Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with this project. a) No Impacts. The proposed projects would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan, as prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with the amendments to the zoning code. Impacts related to any future project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction with applicable specific plan(s) or other review document and may be subject to separate CEQA review. Therefore, no impacts are forecasted to occur as a result of implementation of the proposed projects. b-e) No Impacts. Grading and development activities are not associated with the proposed parking code amendments. Impacts related to any future project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction with applicable zoning specific plan(s) or other review document and may be subject to separate CEQA review and will be subject to the City's standard conditions of approval to minimize local nuisance from grading and construction activities. This condition is in conformance with the SCAQMD requirements and therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 21008) 010 2. A GUIDE TO THE FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM, 2004 EDITION fmm aide 2004. df Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, F-1 El either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact 1151 Mitigation Incorporated b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service'? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on E-1 0 El federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the 0 E-1 F-1 movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an EJ E-1 adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion: The proposed project will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with this project. a, b) No Impact. The California Fish and Game Code was adopted by the State legislature to protect the fish and wildlife resources of the State. Special permits are required for any lake or stream alterations, dredging or other activities that may affect fish and game habitat. No physical improvements are currently proposed in conjunction with the amendment to the parking code. Impacts related to any future project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction IN with the California Fish and Game Code and may be subject to separate CEQA review. Therefore, no impacts will result with implementation of the proposed projects. CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin o) No Impact. |n accordance with the City's existing permit (Order No. R8-20O9-OUJO and NPI]BS No. CAS6l8O30) with the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board, any future applicant may be required to prepare o Storm Water Pollution Prevention pbm (3WPPP)to ensure grading and reclamation oodvhieo do not allow runoff from the site to carry sediment during u storm event to impair the water quality. Any future project that ia considered a priority project will be required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP)to ensure runoff from the site due to ongoing operations do not impair water quality downstream, Therefore, no impact is anticipated as part of the parking code amendment that could cause a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. d) No Impact. As discussed in response N.4h, the parking code amendment does not propose any physical changes. Impacts related &o any future project v/oo|dbckkxdificdandevu|uarediuc juoctiouv/hbthoCu|i6`nuiuFiabuudGume Code and may be subject to separate CE{)A review and conditions of approval limiting grading activities. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated fronmtbe implementation ofthe proposed projects. c) No Impact. The City's General Plan Comumu Element encourage continued maintenance of significant tree stands. The parking ordinance requires landscaping, including trees and shrubs, bn areas at the parking lot that are not used as part nfthe parking and circulation area. Future individual projects would be subject to further review for consistency with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological rcauoroon. Therefore, there is no {oupuoL D No Impact. The City o[Tustin is participating member of the Natural Community Conservation Plan and is within the Coastal 8ub/Ccoboi Orange Counh/NCCP region. No nhvxicui improvements are currently proposed in conjunction with the amendments to the parking code. Impacts related to any future project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction with the applicable NCCPU7CP p|uo or any other conservation plan and may be subject to NONNI separate CB[)/\review. Therefore, the projects ba*eno innpmoL IN Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: i City of Tustin General Plan (June l7'20O8) I City of Tustin Zoning Code 3. Department of Fish and Game, NCCP Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the a) Cause u substantial adverse change in F� rq the oiguiOcmnceofuhish�doairesource -- -- -- -- as defined in § 150645? W Cause u substantial adverse ohan�� F� [� F� �� _ �� the significance ofuoarchaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy o i �l �� ' �� paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature9 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The City of Tustin General Plan sets out conservation goals to maintain and enhance the City's unique culturally and historically significant building sites or features, Specifically, Policy 12.1: Identify, designate, and protect facilities of historical signcance, and Policy 12.3: Development adjacent to a place, structure or object found to be of historic significance should be designed so that the uses permitted and the architectural design will protect the visual setting of the historical site. Since the parking code amendment will not change or alter the physical environment, and each individual proposal will be subject to the City's Goals and Policies of the General Plan, the project is not anticipated to create a substantial adverse change to historical resources and no impacts are forecasted from the implementation of the proposed project. b, c) No Impact. According to the City of Tustin General Plan Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Element (Goal 13), and the Standard Conditions of Approval, individual projects will be subject to site inspection by certified archaeologists or paleontologists for new development in designated sensitive areas. These conditions will be required on a case-by-case basis for individual projects; however the parking code amendment proposes no physical changes. Therefore, no impacts related to archaeological resources would result from the proposed projects. d) No Impact. No physical improvements are currently proposed in conjunction with the parking code amendments. As er, MEN such, the project will not adversely affect, destroy or disturb human remains. Impacts related to any future project would be MOMM identified and evaluated in conjunction with a specific project and standard conditions of approval applied; however, no foreseeable impacts related to cultural resources are anticipated. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2000 1 City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: In Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated CA 2012 -03 & CA 2012 -04 City of Tustin �. VISION� Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated i. Rupture of a known 0 0 earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground El 0 shaking? iii. Seismic- related ground failure, ❑ 0 including liquefaction? }y iv. Landslides? M El �vx b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the F] ❑ El loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil El 0 El that is unstable; or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately El supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Discussions 1�:The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation BONN- and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction 01 with these projects. CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin a (i) Na Impact. According to the City of Tustin General Plan, Public Safety Element 2001\ the Toodo Planning Area (Planning Area) lies vvhbio u ecimzuica||v active region. However, there are no known active or suspected potentially active faults idcobhud vvdbiu the Planning Area. The E| Modena fault pam*ua through the Pkuuoiug Arcu`m northern section; however, studies have not been conclusive about the active/inactive status of this fault. The Code /\mmeudzucoto propose no physical changes and individual proposals would be subject to individual review. Therefore, no impacts axunciuicd with rupture of a known earthquake fault are anticipated with the implementation of the proposed a (ii) No Impact. Tbou is no evidence of any active or potentially active faults within the Tustin Planning Area (Planning Area) and it is not k/ou1ed vvdbin an Alguist-Prio\o Earthquake Fault Zone. However, the Planning Area is located in the seismically active region of southern California. Slight to iu|euao ground shaking is possible at vvhbio the Planning Area ifuo earthquake occurs no a segment ofthe active Dsuba io the region. Under current seismic design atnudu,da and California Building Code (CBC) provisions, new buildings v/oo\d incur only minor damage in axnu}l to moderate earthquakes, and potential structural damage during a large earthquake, although new buildings are expected to remain standing during such events (City ofTustin General Plan, Safety Element). With application of the provisions of Chapter 16/\ Division IV of the 1998 California Building Code and the Structural Engineers /\uoouio1iun of California, (SE/\OC) guidelines, adequate atnzutuuz| protection in the event of an cudbqouke would be provided, thus reducing impacts from strong seismic ground shaking to a less than significant |cvm|. Since there is on development associated with the parking code amendments and individual projects would bo subject tothe California Building Code and the SE/\OC guidelines, no impacts will occur ae part of these projects. a 8ii-iv1N*Impact. There iano development associated with the parking code amendments and individual projects v/on}d be subject to the California Building Code and the S[/\OC guidelines. Furthermore, u abu/durd condition of approval requiring a soils report will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit for any future project. Therc6orm,00 impacts will occur uu part m[ these projects. b) No Impact. The City ofTustin is oco-peunittcu with Orange County io the NyT)ElS program, which ia designed tu rcdouo pollutants in storm v/a1ur runoff. Accordingly, during construction of any future project, the applicant will be required \o develop and submit Storm Water Pollution Prevention y|uo (8VVPP9)\o the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Muuogcmucot p|uu (|{W()K8P) for compliance with the S1u1cvvide NPDES for construction activity. The SWP9P would contain Best MuougcozccU Practices (BK49u) as identified in the Orange County Drainage Area Master p|ao (DAMP) 1u eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. (}coora| BMPm applicable to ounaUac[iun include erosion controls, sediment uou1x/|s, tracking controls, wind erosion oouUn|, uou'o\oon vvatmc management, and materials and water nounagomncu1. /\ standard condition of approval requiring BM9`o as pmt of individual dcvc|opnuon7 plans will be required prior to issuance of grading permit for any future project. Tbcrcfhcu` no impacts will occur as part of these ^-d) No Impact. As indicated inVi.a(iU above, there imnodevelopment associated with the parking code amendments and individual projects would besubject to the California Building Code and thcSEAOC guidelines. A soils report prepared by u certified soils engineer may be required as part of any project on u humio. bb'co there is no development associated with the zoning code amendment, no impacts will occur as part of these projects. m) N* Impact. The proposed code amendments do not involve the use of septic tanks nr alternative wastewater disposal systems. On u basis, any future proposed project wU1 be subject to submit usite-specific geotechnical investigation for the site and preparation ofu geologic undani|acopodproporedbracmrtifiedsodo engineer. Therefore, uo impacts will occur from the implementation of the proposed projects. Mitigation Measures/-Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sworocm: l. City of Tustin General Plan (June l7,2U08) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code IN CA 2012 -03 & CA 2012 -04 City of Tustin 13 3. OC Watersheds httn,/ /www.ocwatersheds.com%DAMP.as�x Issues; Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the D M public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the ❑ ❑ 17 public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle El 1-1 El FEE hazardous or acutely hazardous E r materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included ❑ on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport ❑ 0 E land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a El private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? } 13 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 Issues: g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Less Than Significant Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated D El El F-1 City of Tustin Less Than Significant Impact 0 M No Impact MP a 0 Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a - c) No Impact. The projects involve the implementation of zoning code amendment for parking. There are no am hazardous materials proposed as part of this project. Each individual development project will be subject to review on a MIN case-by-case basis for hazardous materials. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue will result from the praposed projects, and no mitigation measures are required. d) No Impact. These projects do not involve a specific hazardous materials site. Any new development project will be subject to review with the list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. A standard condition of approval will require a site-specific geotechnical investigation for the entire site and preparation of a geologic and soils report will be required as part of the project. Therefore, no impacts related to this issue will result from the proposed projects. e - I) No Impact. According to the City's General Plan Circulation Element, air travel is available from John Wayne Airport in Orange County, approximately five miles to the south by surface roadway. However, the Tustin Planning Area does not lie within any of John Way's safety zones. The former MCAS Tustin helicopter station is located in the southern portion of the City. A Specific Plan for reuse of the base has resulted in the elimination of aviation uses, with the exception of heliports individually permitted or blimp operations as an interim use. Any new development will be subject to review with the Airport Land Use Commission if necessary. Any conditions of approval will be incorporated into each individual project where necessary. Therefore, no safety hazards are anticipated related to this issue. g-h) No Impact. The proposed parking code amendments would not involve any uses that would interfere with the City's Emergency Operations Plan or with major emergency evacuation routes out of the area nor is it anticipated to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) E CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY R City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated 1:1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:1 F-1 F, r-1 r-1 ❑ r-1 ❑ ❑ z ❑ El ❑ F-1 F-1 r-1 M Would the project: a) During project construction, substantially impair the water quality of receiving waters? In considering water quality, factors such as water temperature, dissolved oxygen levels, and turbidity should be considered, b) Following project construction, substantially impair the water quality of receiving waters? In considering water quality, factors such as water temperature, dissolved oxygen levels, and turbidity should be considered. C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in flooding- or off-site? d) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off - site? e) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? 0 Otherwise result in substantial increased erosion or siltation on- or off-site? R City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated 1:1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:1 F-1 F, r-1 r-1 ❑ r-1 ❑ ❑ z ❑ El ❑ F-1 F-1 r-1 M CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 Issues: g) Change runoff flow rates or volumes in a manner that substantially alters the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, and results in a significant adverse environmental impact? h) Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems? i) Increase impervious surfaces and runoff in a manner that substantially impairs water quality or causes other significant adverse environmental impacts? D Provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff or increase the discharges of pollutants such as heavy metals, pathogens, petroleum derivatives, synthetic organics, sediment, nutrients, oxygen-demanding substances, and trash? k) For projects that are tributary to water bodies that are listed as impaired on the Clean Water Act section 303(d) list, result in an increase of any pollutant for which the water body is listed as impaired? 1) Substantially degrade or impair an environmentally sensitive area? M) Substantially degrade or impair surface water quality of marine, fresh, or wetland waters? n) Substantially degrade or impair groundwater quality? H City of Tustin Potentially L Less Than L Less Than No Significant S Significant S Significant Impact Impact W With I Impact Mitigation Incorporated El 1 1:1 ❑ 0 El F-1 ❑ 0111115111 z 11 El F1 0111111 rt, 1:1 El 0 z El 1:1 F-1 z El F-1 F-1 z El F-1 wmu. CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 0-119- Issues: BI- rEEN 0) Substantially degrade aquatic, wetland, Less Than or riparian habitat? P) Otherwise substantially degrade water Significant quality? q) Cause or contribute to an exceedance Impact of applicable surface water or groundwater receiving water quality objectives or degradation of beneficial uses? r) Violate any other water quality ❑ standards or waste discharge ❑ requirements? S) Substantially deplete groundwater ❑ supplies or interfere substantially with @001301-1 groundwater recharge such that there 011 would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? t) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood delineation map? U) Place within a I00 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flows? V) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 17 City of Tustin Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ EJ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ H ❑ 1:1 ❑ F� ❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ ❑ ❑ F� CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 reduce pollutants in storm water runoff. Accordingly, during construction of a development project, the applicant will be City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. General BMPs applicable to construction include erosion Significant Significant Significant Impact 1, water management. Impact With Impact BONN future project would potentially meet all applicable regulations to manage runoff from the project site. Pollutants in storm Mitigation NONNI part of these projects, there would be no impacts. Incorporated W) Expose people or structures to a 17 F-1 EJ significant risk of inundation by sciche, discussed in Response No. VIII.a-b, any future project would be required, as part of the standard conditions of approval, tsunami, or mudflow? (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with these Discussion: The proposed project will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with this project. a - b) No Impact. The City of Tustin is a co-permittee with Orange County in the NPDES program, which is designed to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff. Accordingly, during construction of a development project, the applicant will be required to develop and submit a SWPPP to the Santa Ana RWQMP for compliance with the Statewide NPDES for construction activity. The SWPPP would contain BMPs as identified in the Orange County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. General BMPs applicable to construction include erosion controls, sediment controls, tracking controls, wind erosion control, non-storm water management, and materials and water management. By preparing a SWPPP for NPDES compliance in addition to the standard conditions of approval for water quality, any future project would potentially meet all applicable regulations to manage runoff from the project site. Pollutants in storm water would be substantially reduced by source control and treatment BMPs. In that there is no development proposed as NONNI part of these projects, there would be no impacts. c) No Impact. Construction of any future project may temporarily alter existing drainage patterns, as there would be areas of exposed soil during grading and excavation activities. If a storm event were to occur during these activities, exposed sediments may be carried off-site and into the local storm drain system increasing siltation. However, as discussed in Response No. VIII.a-b, any future project would be required, as part of the standard conditions of approval, to implement construction BMPs in compliance with the NPDES permit and Orange County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with these projects. d -e) No Impact. The projects includes minor text amendments to the zoning code. Any future project would be subject to individual review and may be subject to CEQA review. To ensure off-site drainage does not result in flooding on or off-site, any future applicant may be required, as part of the standard conditions of approval, to provide on-site hydrology and hydraulic calculations for the proposed development and hydraulic calculations for proposed connections to the existing storm drain system. This will ensure drainage improvements of any future project site will have a less than significant effect on the environment. However, there are no impacts associated with the implementation of the parking ordinance. f) No Impact. Compliance with the NPDES permit (refer to Response VIII.a-b) and BMPs (discussed in Responses VIII.a-b, VIII.c, and VIIIA above) would reduce potential water quality impacts to less than significant levels. There are no impacts associated with the implementation of the parking ordinance. g - h) No Impact. Future projects may generate runoff and may increase runoff and types of pollutants (i.e.: some trash and oil/grease from vehicles) that are typically associated with parking areas. However, adherence to an approved le, Water Quality Management Plan will help to minimize polluted runoff into the storm drain. Since there is no development 18 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin associated with the parking code amendments and individual jeci may ho subject toproviding uW()M9ono 1111131111M case basis, no impacts will occur as parr of these projects, i-j) No Impact. As described in response Vlllg-h, runoff typically increases with parking, however, there is no development associated with the zoning amendment and individual projects v/onldheuubjcc1topruvidingu WQMP on case-by-case basis. Therefore there are no impacts associated with the proposed project, &) No Impact. Any future project may goucro10 and increase runoff and types of pollutants (i.e.: some tumb and o from As discussed in Response No. V1Da-N and c\ construction and operation of any new project will be subject to comply with the requirements of the Orange County NPDES program, which is designed to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff. Accordingly, any new applicant will be required to implement BB4Po as identified in the Orange Couuty Drainage Area Master Plan (D&MP)io eliminate mrreduce erosion and polluted runoff during and after construction ofthe proposed project. Adherence to an approved Water Quality Management Plan will help to minimize polluted runoff into the ston-n drain. There is no development associated with these projects uodindividuu1projects would be subject ho providing oVV(}MP on ucuae'by-oaac basis. Therefore, no inupuuim will occur. 1) No Impact. There is no construction proposed as part o[the proposed projects. There are no Environmentally Sensitive Areas (GS/\`y) or /\reuu of Special Biological Significance iASBS\ kbxddiod on the San Diego Creek Wutcmbu] map. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. m) No Impact. |funew development or redevelopment project involves the addition of 2,500 square feet ucmore of impervious surface and is located p/hhbu, directly adjacent to (vvkbh/ 200 feet), ordischarging directly to receiving waters within cuvi,onn/cotu||v mcnxbivc urcum, then it guu|i5oo as a priority project and is subject to additional requirements. 9i000 there is no development associated with these projects and individual projects would be subject to providing a WOK3P unocume-hv-ouxe booiu, no impacts will occur. u) No Impact. There iyno development associated with these projects uodfuture p - cciovou(dbcyuN~ ociioindividuu| review ona case-by-case buaim` no impacts will occur uo part nfthese projects. o) No Impact. As discussed in response VNL there are noEnvironmentally Sensitive Areas (B3A`s)m Areas ufSpecial Biological Significance (\SBS) identified on the 8uod Diego Creek Watershed map. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. p - o)NoUmmpuot. Am discussed iu Response No. VD1u-o, any future construction ofindividual projects will be subject no comply with the requirements of the Orange CountyNPT]ES program, p/biob is designed no reduce pollutants in mkonn water runoff. Accordingly, any individual applicant will he required to ioop)cneut BMPo as identified in the Orange County [)ruinuQc Area Master P|uo (DAMP) to eliminate or noduoc erosion and polluted runoff during and after construction uf the proposed project. No impact io associated with the Code Amendments. r) No Impact. As discussed in Response No. V7Ua-c,any future proposed construction and operation ofunindividual project will be subject to comply with the requirements of the Orange County NP[>E0 program, which is designed to reduce pollutants in storm water rnooO[ Accordingly.. individual applicants will be required to implement BM9a as identified in the Orange County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff during and after construction of the proposed project. No impact areas are anticipated us part of this Code Amendments. � No Impact. As discussed in Response Mo. VD/ n, mince there is no development associated with these projects and future projects would be subject to individual review on u basis, no impacts will occur as pod of these U, CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin t - u) No Impact. Any individual projects will besubject to review according to the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The map rvuu)d indicate whether a project was subject to a flood zone. However, no development is proposed as part ofthese projects. Therefore, there are uo impacts associated with this issue. v) No Impact. hthe unlikely event of flooding asoresult of the failure ofu levee mdam, the City has implemented an Emergency Preparedness Plan that addresses several hazard areas including This Emergency Preparedness Plan has been reviewed bv State and Federal agencies which have their own roles inthe event ofaoemergency. Any future development project would be subject to review onauase-Fy-casc basis asm whether m not dis within a flood zone (as addressed in VIII t-u) and potentially subject to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding aau result of the failure ofu levee o/dam. However, there are uo impacts associated with these projects. w) No Impact. Any future development projects would be subject to review 10 determine whether the project is v/hhbo un area that has been identified as susceptible to Uqoofaoduu or potential bedrock |oodoUdum. These areas are identified on Figu/eCOSB-1 of the ("ity's General Plan. When development is proposed within these areas, studies shall be performed as directed by the City to determine the potential for hazards and the amount of development which is supportable on the site. As described in \/1I| v, in the unlikely event of iuuoJoiimn by scicbo, tsunami, or rnudDovv an individual project would be part of the City's Emergency Preparedness Plan. Therefore, no impacts associated with this issue. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mcuaurmm required Sources: i City of Tustin General Plan (June l7,20O0) 2 City ofTustin Zoning Code 1 (}CWuterahoda Iueocy: 9o|ccdim||v Less Than Significant Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Ix. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the Less Than Significant Impact a) Physically divide an established El N1 o Impact @ Conflict with any applicable land use El [-1 plan, policy, oc regulation ofauagency with jurisdiction over the project but not limited tothe local general plan, specific ooumbdpcogran�,or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding oo mitigating an environmental effect9 d Conflict with any applicable habitat El Fl F-1 p� conservation plan ornatural community conservation plan? NE CA 2012 -03 &CA 2012-04 City of Tustin The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The parking ordinance update will provide minor text amendments to clarify and strengthen regulations and will not divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts will occur. b) No Impact. The City's General Plan Circulation Element Implementation Program indicates the following: "Parking Ordinance Study: The City shall complete a Parking Ordinance study which will include issues such as guest parking standards, shared use of parking facilities, parking for smaller vehicles and necessary changes to City codes and regulations." This parking ordinance update will provide minor text amendments to the parking requirements to clarify and strengthen regulations. Therefore, the project is in conformance with the General Plan, and there are no conflicts related to this issue. c) No Impact. As indicated in response IV f, the City of Tustin is a participating member of the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and is within the Central/Coastal Orange County region. No physical improvements are currently proposed in conjunction with the amendments to the parking code. Impacts related to any future project would be identified and evaluated in conjunction with the applicable NCCP/HCP plan or any other conservation plan and may be subject to separate CEQA review. As a result, no impacts are anticipated from the implementation of the proposed projects. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required : Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 200$) ME WINE 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated X MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a El known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a El locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact [00 101 Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation mhand enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction k IN with these projects. 21 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin a -b) No Impact, According to the City of Tustin Conservation/Open Space/Recreations Element (Figure COSR-2) there are no known mineral resources within the City that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state. Therefore, there are no project related impacts associated with mineral resources. ass Issues: X1 NOISE, Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated 0 EJ D 0 No Impact G El D z D El z F-1 El z El El z El El z Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a—lo 0 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin m-d) No Impact. The City o[ Tustin General Plan Noise Element, and the City's Municipal Code, 68cutkon AN 4h l4` Noise Control (Noise (]n1inance)eabab|iab noise standards for the City. The Sujen/ and Noise Element addresses kl-111111 noise with respect to general land use compatibility, while the Noise Ordinance addresses noise from specific sources. The Noise Ordinance established exterior noise guodurdm of 55 dB/\ during the daytime hours between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 pm. and 50 dB/\during the nighttime hours bcinneu lO:OO pm. and 7:00 a.m. These noise standards are adjusted further based on the cumulative duration of the noise occurrence, as well as the prevailing ambient noise levels near the project. Each future individual development project will be subject to review on u basis. The proposed projects would not expose people to excessive noise, therefore, no impact will occur osu result uFthese projects. e-f) No Impact. As indicated in response Vl1r-f, according to the City's General Plan Circulation Element, air travel is available from John Wayne Airport in Orange County, approximately five miles tothe south 6vsurface However, the TumLbm Planning Area does not lie within any of John VVav'm anGetv zones. The former K4C/\S Tustin helicopter station was located in the southern portion of the City. /\ Specific Plan for reuse ofthe haao has resulted in the elimination of aviation uses, with the exception of heliports individually permitted or blimp operations as an interim use. New development could he ao6ieot to review with the Airport Land Use Commission if necessary as well as with the Noise Ordinance. Any conditions of approval will be incorporated into each individual project v/bcrensccmaury. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: i City of Tustin General Plan (June |7,2008\ 2. City ufTustin Zoning Code Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant lmmuot NINE |cnpou< With Impact Mitigation Incorporated Xl| POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, bv proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road orother infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of F� �� people, necessitating the construction nf replacement housing elsewhere? 11 The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation IIand enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction I with these projects. 23 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin a) No Impact. The Tustin Planning Area is an established and urbanized area. The parking code updates will better 111 organize and supplement Tustin's existing parking regulations to clarify and strengthen regulations. There is no lglll development associated with the Code Amendments. Therefore, no impact on the local or regional population is expected INS to occur. b) No Impact. There is no development associated with the Code Amendments Therefore, no housing would be displaced by the implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. c) No Impact. As stated in Response No. X11 b) no development is associated with the Code Amendment and no persons would be displaced by the implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated XIII PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical F-1 71 impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 1-1 71 F-1 M Police protection? D El ❑ Schools? 0 1-1 Parks? ❑ ❑ N Other public facilities? E] El M Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. 24 0 N I CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin a) Fire protection. No Impact. The Orange County Fire Authority provides fire protection for the City of Tustin on a Ig contractual basis. All water mains and fire hydrants must be constructed in accordance with Orange County guidelines and are subject to approval by the Orange County Fire Authority. Adherence to these guidelines will ensure that no significant impacts on fire protection services will occur. Future projects will be subject to individual review by the Fire Authority. Therefore, there are no impacts related to fire protection. Police protection. No Impact. The Tustin Police Department provides law enforcement services within the City of Tustin. Routine and scheduled patrolling is done throughout the City and would continue as they do under existing conditions. It is not anticipated that the proposed parking amendments would require additional officers. Rather, it is assumed that the Police Department will continue to assess and evaluate its crime statistics for problem areas within the City. No impacts associated with the implementation of the parking code. Schools. No Impact. The proposed project will not provide housing that would generate demand for additional schools. The project will not increase student population necessitating a need for new or expanded school facilities. No impacts are anticipated. Parks. No Impact. The proposed projects do not propose new construction and would not attract new residents to the area. Therefore, the project would not generate a demand for additional parks. No mitigation measures are required. Other Public Facilities. No Impact. The proposed parking ordinance update addresses parking requirements for z:' future projects. The proposed project would not result in any substantial increase in demands on other government services or public facilities such as roads, libraries, hospitals, or post offices. Future projects may generate traffic PIN however; these impacts would be reviewed and considered on a case-by-ease basis and conditions of approval included as necessary to mitigate impacts. These projects would not increase the need for maintenance of these public facilities. No mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: XIV RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 25 Potentially Less Than Less Than Significant Significant Significant Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ No Impact a CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin b) Does the project include recreational F-1 facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a -b) No Impact. The proposed projects will provide minor text amendments to the parking code. The proposed project does not involve the construction of uses that will increase demand for parks. Therefore, the proposed projects will not adversely impact existing recreational facilities. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 1'1, 2008} 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: XV TRANSPORTATION/ TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? ma Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated El ❑ ❑ N ❑ El ❑ CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin A Result in inadequate parking capacity? [� Fl �� ^� u� u) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, F-I �l �l �� moprugcao�osupponingalternative �� transportation (e.g.' bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 0imommmiom: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and entorccm/en1ofcxiodnO parking rcquirenucu1aand standards. Nk� physical irupruveozeo1 uo�proposed i^oo conjunction vvi1btbceu projects, ' o) No Impact. Construction and operation of future projects may generate traffic. These impacts would he reviewed and considered on ucuac-bv-cumcbasis and conditions of approval included ua necessary tomitigate impacts. The proposed project is not anticipated to impact traffic. No mitigation is necessary. b) No Impact. The City has adopted u Congestion Management Program (CMp ) to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a nccbaoimu for coordinating |uud use development and tnu�opod aon improvement d�o�a�no. Any future project will require review and conformance with the requirements of the Tustin General Plan and the CMP. However, no improvements are proposed us part of these projects. Tbcrcfore,itvvnuldhuvcnoioupuotandnoonitigu1iuniouecmmmury. c) No Impact. The projects would not produce any air traffic increases, nor would im��. No are undohpu1cd�oo� irnp|cm/en�Ai000f the proposed p 'cct . ' - 6N No Impact. The parking ordinance update will provide minor text amendments to clarify and strengthen parking regulations. This will be'n to ensure that individual future projects are designed 10 avoid hazards and be conp u1 /n| op uu surrounding uses. c) No Impact. The proposed projects do not include any new development and will not result in ' emergency aoceme. Future projects will be reviewed and considered on aooue r basis and conditions ofapproval included as necessary to mitigate impacts. No mitigation is necessary, N No Impact. Individual uses and their required parking need will be updated to ensure that — ' ' - cupuohv r'-''--~ fhrfb�uru ,^`u �ct ~' ^^~~^~^, there is no impact issue and no u/�u�oo ia neocumury. u1 No Impact. The projects will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation in that the parking code update are minor text amendments to Tustin's existing parking regulations and help 27 Issues: Pmc�u� Less Than Less Than No ROO Significant SiAuiOcuu1 Significant /mouut Impact with Impact Mitigation Incorporated d) Substantially increase hazards due k/u �l �� design feature *�u(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Result ininadequate erncrgcuuy access? A Result in inadequate parking capacity? [� Fl �� ^� u� u) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, F-I �l �l �� moprugcao�osupponingalternative �� transportation (e.g.' bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 0imommmiom: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and entorccm/en1ofcxiodnO parking rcquirenucu1aand standards. Nk� physical irupruveozeo1 uo�proposed i^oo conjunction vvi1btbceu projects, ' o) No Impact. Construction and operation of future projects may generate traffic. These impacts would he reviewed and considered on ucuac-bv-cumcbasis and conditions of approval included ua necessary tomitigate impacts. The proposed project is not anticipated to impact traffic. No mitigation is necessary. b) No Impact. The City has adopted u Congestion Management Program (CMp ) to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a nccbaoimu for coordinating |uud use development and tnu�opod aon improvement d�o�a�no. Any future project will require review and conformance with the requirements of the Tustin General Plan and the CMP. However, no improvements are proposed us part of these projects. Tbcrcfore,itvvnuldhuvcnoioupuotandnoonitigu1iuniouecmmmury. c) No Impact. The projects would not produce any air traffic increases, nor would im��. No are undohpu1cd�oo� irnp|cm/en�Ai000f the proposed p 'cct . ' - 6N No Impact. The parking ordinance update will provide minor text amendments to clarify and strengthen parking regulations. This will be'n to ensure that individual future projects are designed 10 avoid hazards and be conp u1 /n| op uu surrounding uses. c) No Impact. The proposed projects do not include any new development and will not result in ' emergency aoceme. Future projects will be reviewed and considered on aooue r basis and conditions ofapproval included as necessary to mitigate impacts. No mitigation is necessary, N No Impact. Individual uses and their required parking need will be updated to ensure that — ' ' - cupuohv r'-''--~ fhrfb�uru ,^`u �ct ~' ^^~~^~^, there is no impact issue and no u/�u�oo ia neocumury. u1 No Impact. The projects will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation in that the parking code update are minor text amendments to Tustin's existing parking regulations and help 27 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin provide comprehensive parking regulations. These regulations are consistent with the City's Circulation Element which addresses the circulation improvements needed to provide adequate capacity for future land uses. The Element establis a hierarchy of transportation routes with specific development standards. Future projects will be required to conform t the City's Circulation Element based on individual review. Therefore, there is no impact to this issue and no mitigation i necessary. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code Issues: XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall consider whether the project is subject to the water supply assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et. Seq. (SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221). 28 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation incorporated ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11000, F-1 F-1 ❑ z 1:1 El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ F-1 ❑ CA 2012 -03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin Issues. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation NI Incorporated e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the projects projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments` f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The Tustin Planning Area is located within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board. Any wastewater generated by future projects would be subject to review for impacts on wastewater facilities. Typically, any increase in wastewater flows resulting from an oft - street parking project would be minimal. Future projects would be required to comply with local and state regulations to minimize any potential impacts from hazardous materials use. As discussed in Section VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality, any future project would be required to implement standard BMPs to control storm water runoff at the project site. Therefore, no impacts are associated with these projects. b) No Impact. Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) provides water and wastewater services and the Orange County Sewer District provides wastewater services within the Tustin Planning Area. The amount of potable water needed and wastewater generated by a future project would most likely be nominal. Minor infrastructure improvements may be M required to provide on -site connections from the existing seater and wastewater services to any new project. These minor OR improvements would be reviewed on a case -by -case basis for any potential to cause significant environmental impacts. Since there are no new wastewater treatments facilities or potable water facilities will be needed as part of these projects � there are no impacts. Ice h) Would the project include a new or retrofitted storm water treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g. water quality treatment NI basin, constructed treatment wetlands), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors and odors)? Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The Tustin Planning Area is located within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board. Any wastewater generated by future projects would be subject to review for impacts on wastewater facilities. Typically, any increase in wastewater flows resulting from an oft - street parking project would be minimal. Future projects would be required to comply with local and state regulations to minimize any potential impacts from hazardous materials use. As discussed in Section VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality, any future project would be required to implement standard BMPs to control storm water runoff at the project site. Therefore, no impacts are associated with these projects. b) No Impact. Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) provides water and wastewater services and the Orange County Sewer District provides wastewater services within the Tustin Planning Area. The amount of potable water needed and wastewater generated by a future project would most likely be nominal. Minor infrastructure improvements may be M required to provide on -site connections from the existing seater and wastewater services to any new project. These minor OR improvements would be reviewed on a case -by -case basis for any potential to cause significant environmental impacts. Since there are no new wastewater treatments facilities or potable water facilities will be needed as part of these projects � there are no impacts. Ice CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin c) No Impact. As discussed in Response No. XVI a) above, future projects would be required to comply wit local MEMO state regulations to minimize any potential impacts from expansion of existing facilities. Any future project would bQ1 required to implement standard BMPs to control storm water runoff at the project site. There are no impacts fro implementation of the proposed project. The project would also implement construction and post-construction BMPs in compliance with the NPDES permit and Orange County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. d- e) No Impact. As discussed in Response No. 7C\/ b) above., the increase in water demand from any future project is anticipated tobenominal. New project vvon|d be reviewed oua basis for any potential to cause significant environmental impacts. No mitigation measures are required. f-g) No Impact. CR&R Waste Services provides solid waste collection and disposal services to the City of Tustin. Any solid waste generated afuture project would bu diverted ioa transfer station and then to the Bee Canyon/Bowerman Landfill located at 11002 Bee Canyon /\conaa Road in Irvine. The parking code amendments do not propose any construction however, future projects would be reviewed on an individual buacu. Parking is unoa|h/ an accessory requirement to uruain use and typically geucotcm only nouoiuo} inonuuoc in waste. This inuncuao would be well within the 9U0 tons of waste that Bee Canyon/Bowerman Luudfi||can accommodate. Furthermore, any future project v/ouldbc required to comply with local, state, and federal rcgoi,crncntu for integrated waste management (i.e. recycling) and solid waste disposal. Waste Management provides recycling opportunities to buniueomce and institutions, although icop|ozncn1utiuu of recycling programs by businesses and institutions is voluntary. The project is anticipated tohave ono impact on landfill capacity. h) No Impact. A Standard Condition of Approval will be added to individual future projects requiring uWater Quality Management Plan ( ) for the use of non sboo{uo*| and/or structural ByW9m including but not limited totenant ednua1ion,aotivitvreebictiuns,abo*taveeping,iandmcupodurcauvvidhc[Duieoibduudonmudlimodedron-ot[mbatcgicu| placed catch basins with fboaU Uhcro, and catch basin stenciling. BMya required as part ofuo individual project vvou| not ncccmomilyresult in any migniDuuntcuvivoonuuutuloAio1. I�o impact aypa'1of these projects. ��| Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation mmaures required Sources: ). City of Tustin General Iqun (June |7,2OO8) 2. City uf Tustin Zoning Code ME Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The proposed parking code amendments will provide minor text amendments for clarified implementation of the parking requirements. The minor text amendments will better organize and supplement Tustin's existing parking regulations. There is no development proposed as part of these Code Amendments, therefore, the projects will not have the potential to significantly impact sensitive resources. PON 1b) No Impact. As discussed in response XV11a, the parking code amendment will provide minor text amendments. The Amendments, as proposed, are consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. Therefore, the project is not expected to have any cumulatively considerable impacts. 31 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin Issues: Potentially Less Than Less Than No E 110 Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact With Impact Mitigation Incorporated XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade ❑ ❑ the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve El short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion: The proposed projects will provide updated parking ordinance with minor text amendments for clarified implementation and enforcement of existing parking requirements and standards. No physical improvements are proposed in conjunction with these projects. a) No Impact. The proposed parking code amendments will provide minor text amendments for clarified implementation of the parking requirements. The minor text amendments will better organize and supplement Tustin's existing parking regulations. There is no development proposed as part of these Code Amendments, therefore, the projects will not have the potential to significantly impact sensitive resources. PON 1b) No Impact. As discussed in response XV11a, the parking code amendment will provide minor text amendments. The Amendments, as proposed, are consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. Therefore, the project is not expected to have any cumulatively considerable impacts. 31 CA 2012-03 & CA 2012-04 City of Tustin 10111 c) No Impact. As demonstrated throughout this Initial Study, the proposed projects will not have any significant effect considered cumulatively considerable. d) No Impact. As demonstrated throughout this Initial Study, the Code Amendments do not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. zl� Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: No additional mitigation measures required Sources: 1. City of Tustin General Plan (June 17, 2008) 2. City of Tustin Zoning Code 32 DRAFT Ail , 2DI Isdamas *00, a The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows: K That the Parking Ordinance was adopted in 2008 and provided standards for day care centers. That the proposed amendment would provide an optional criterion for day care center parking ratio of one (1) space per staff member and one (1) space for every ten (10) students with adequate drop-off and pick-up areas. & That the City of Tustin has a substantial interest in protecting the public health and safety, and harmony of the community by providing strengthened and clarified off-street parking requirements and standards. C. That on December 11, 2012, a public hearing was duly noticed, called, and held on minor Code Amendment 2012-04 by the Planning Commission. D. That on 1 2013, a public hearing was duly noticed, called, and held on MEM Code Amendment 2012-04 by the City Council. E That the proposed amendment is considered a "project" subject to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). That the City has prepared an Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the Code Amendment in conjunction with Code Amendment 2012-03 (Parking Code Update) in accordance with the City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. F. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation (4th Edition) data. G. That the Public Works Engineering Division has reviewed and is in support of the proposed code amendment. H. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Tustin General Plan in that it complies with the following goals and policies: Circulation Element Goal 7: Provide for well-designed and convenient parking facilities. Policy 7.2: Provide sufficient off-street parking for all land uses. Policy 7.3: Encourage the efficient use of parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities, smaller vehicles and other Draft Ordinance 1425 CA 2012-04 Page 2 provisions to improve the effectiveness of City codes and ordinances. Section 2. Subsection 9263g Table 1 of the Tustin City Code, regarding Child Day Care Center parking is hereby amended as follows: Land" Use Type Parking Spaces Required Child day care centers 1 space for each employee and teacher on maximum shift, plus 1 space for each 5 children at maximum enrollmentLor, 1 space for each employee and teacher on maximum shift, plus 1 space for each 10 children at maximum enrollment if adequate drop-off facilities provided. Drop-off facilities must be designed to accommodate a continuous flow of passenger vehicles to safely load and unload children. The adequacy of drop-off facilities proposed shall be determined by the approval body for the proposed use. Section 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held out to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any Mor court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Tustin on this — day of _, 2013. PATRICIA ESTRELLA, City Clerk 11TW719T11171"i =,Mn' CA 2012-04 Page 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE )ss. CITY OF TUSTIN PATRICIA ESTRELLA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1425 was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the _ day of _, 2013 and was given its second reading, passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of _, 2013 by the following vote: PATRICIA ESTRELLA City Clerk Published: