Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 J.W. AIR NOISE 08-07-00 NO. 6 08-07-00 _ Inter-Com DATE' AUGUST 7, 2000 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the third and fourth quarters of 1999. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N (formerly M-7), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, slightly increased during the third quarter and decreased during the fourth quarter. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION Receive and file report. FISCAL IMPACT The City retains the acoustics consulting fn-m of J.J. Van Houten and Associates, Inc. to review JWA Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports. The costs for such reviews are annually included in the Community Development Department budget. DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and transmits a copy of the report to the City of Tustin. Twice a year, the City's consultant prepares a report, which summarizes two quarterly reports. Exhibit A contains the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of 1999. Exhibit B contains the summary report prepared by the noise consultant. A brief overview of the information contained within these attachments follows. Measured Noise Levels During the third quarter of 1999, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 1 ON (formerly RMS #7), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School was 57.4 dB. This is .5 dB more than the four previous quarters. However, for comparison, the CNEL was 1.1 dB lower (56.3) during the third quarter of 1998. City Council Report .IWA Noise Abatement Ouarlc~,: J<eports August 7, 2000 Page 2 During the fourth quarter of 1999, the average CNEL was 56.0 dB. This is 1.1 dB more than the four previous quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was 1.2 dB higher (57.2) during the fourth quarter of 1998. All measured noise levels are below the City, County and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. Noise Complaints During the third quarter of 1999, there were 57 Tustin/Orange complaints compared with 79 for the same period during 1998. During the fourth quarter of 1999, there were 18 Tustin/Orange complaints compared with 32 for the same period during 1998. The number of complaints decreased during the third and fourth quarters compared to the same period in 1998. The overall number of complaints during the last two quarters of 1999 appears to correlate with the average quarterly aircraft CNEL but not with the number of quarterly jet operations at the airport. The number of jet operations increased steadily throughout 1999, but the number of complaints peaked in the third quarter and dropped significantly in the fourth quarter. Type and Mix of Aircraft Related to Noise Levels During the third quarter of 1999, the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft increased and the percentage of noisier Class A aircraft decreased compared with the same period in 1998. The average CNEL for the third quarter of 1999 was slightly higher than 'the same period during 1998. During the fourth quarter of 1999 the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft increased and the percentage of noisier Class A aircraft decreased compared with the same period in 1998. The average CNEL for the fourth quarter was slightly lower than the fourth quarter of 1998. The percentage of quieter Class E aircraft using John Wayne Airport has increased slightly in 1999, compared to 1998. This percentage increase in Class E aircraft was offset by a decrease in the use of the noisier Class A and Class AA aircraft. Based on data fi.om first quarter of 1998. through the fourth quarter of 1999, there does not appear to be any correlation between the aircraft mix and the average quarterly CNEL at NMS 10. Airport Noise Contours A noise contour was utilized by Van Houten and Associates, Inc. in preparing the attached report. This noise contour is based on the 1998 contours developed by the noise consultant for the John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement office. Using this new contour, it is estimated that in 1999 the aircraft-generated CNEL in Tustin will range from about 60 dB to less than 55 dB. This is well below the City, County and State criteria of 65 dB for residential areas. City Council Report JWA Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports August 7, 2000 Page 3 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John' Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Justi~ Willkom Associate Planner E'gzabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Exhibits A, John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 1999- September 30, 1999 and October 1, 1999 - December 31, 1999. Bo Review of John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Reports, 3rd and 44 Quarters 1999 (Van Houten and Associates, Inc.) \\COMM DEV~VOLI~SHARED\CDD-RDA\CDD~USTINAkIWAXJWA report to council 08-07-00.doc -- EXHIBIT A John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999 and October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 RECEIVED COM Niff DEVEL NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For t. he period: July 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2J, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards ~mitted by: Alan Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 107th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SU31MARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels. Effective July 1, 1999, the numbers used to refer to the remote monitoring stations were changed. In the new numbering scheme, the letters "S" and "N" refer to the monitoring stations' location either to the south or to the north of the airport. The numbering and location of each monitor is as follows: Former NMS Number MONITOR STATIONS New NMS Number Location 1 1S 2 2S 3 3S 22 4S 21 5S 24 6S 6 7S 9 8N 8 9N 7 10N Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach 324 ~ Vista Madera, Newport Beach 1918 Santiago, Newport Beach 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 1998 - September 30, 1999). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- "' FIGURE I JOI-..,i STATION ! WAYNE LOCATION I 1 t. AIF,, 'ORT MAP I JOHN WAYNE NMS - NOISE MONITORING STATION -2- LEGEND Noise Monitors ~ Multi-Family Residential ,,':',j' 65 dB CNEL Contour B Single Family Residential STATISTI CS: N Incompatible Land Use Area: 24.4 Acres or .039 square miles .~ Number of Dwellings: 105 Number of People: 263 (Based on 2.5 people per D.U.) JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65 dB CNEL Impact Area October 1998 - September 1999 J~e$lre ~reve A$$ociale$ -3- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July - ~ eptember 1999 · , Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Prop Operations (2) Jet Operations July 7,205 668 1,254 43,118 273 August 7,266 654 1,103 45,001 270 September 6,987 604 1,126 38,693 270 Third Quarter 21,458 1,926 3,483 126,812 271 Twelve Months 81,594 6,044 14,327 448,456 263 10/01/98 - 09/30/99 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY ,(Landing and Takeoff Operations) Jet Carrier ~litary Prop Carrier GA Jet GA Other July o September 1999 ........ i~; _---;-,,,] 21,458 25 1,926 ~! 3,483 ~ 99,289 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (l) Business Jet fi=mares include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE Eq}UIV.M.~ENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carder and Business Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. -4- For the twelve month period ending September 30, 1999, 105 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an decrease of two units in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending June 30, 1999. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-1) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".) During the third quarter of 1999, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 224 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1.1999 - September 30, 1999) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period July 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999, the Office received 684 complaints from citizens. This is a 98.3% increase from the 345 complaints received last quarter. It is a 3.0% decrease from the 705 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 120 , 108 ? 100 ~ [] 81 60 ~ 41 40~ 22 I 25 ~.8 :>l ~,, 25 26 27 20 i 4 12 9 i 15 9 7 13 o ia · Communi~ One household is responsible for 55% of the 96 calls from Balboa Island. -5- TABLE 2 LONG TBR_k4 .k,[EASU~D LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/98 through 9/99 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site II~ ~ ~ ~ 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S ~ 9N ~ Oct 1998 66.4 65.4 64.1 59.2 59.8 60.1 57.4 58.1 52.2 67.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 1998 66.5 65.6 64.6 61.8 60.2 60.6 57.7 56.8 52.5 66.9 # Days 30 30 30 16 22 30 27 30 30 30 l Dec 1998 66.0 64.7 64.7 58.7 59.3 61.2 56.0 56.6 52.1 66.1 !# Days 31 31 31 15~ 31 31 31 31 31 31 ;Q-4 1998 66.3! 65.2 64.4 59.9 59.7 60.7 57.1 57.2 52.2 66.8 # Days 92 92 92 62! 84 92 89 92 92 92 Jan 1999 66.0 65.0 63.7 59.1 59.0 58.8 56.6 56.0 52.4 66.5 # Days 31 31 30 30 30 30 28 31 29 30 Feb 1999 66.2 65.3 64.5 59.1 59.8 59.7 56.4 56.7' 52.7 66.8 # Days 28 28 28 26 27 26 26 26 28 27 Mar 1999 66.3 65.7 63.9 59.3 60.4 58.9 57.0 57.1 55.5 67.7: # Days 31 31 31 31 30 7 30 27 29 31 Q-1 1999 66.2 65.3 64.1 59.2 59.7 59.2! 56.7 56.6 53.8 67.01 # Days 90 90 89 87 87 63 84 64 86 88 Apr 1999 66.2 66.0 64.1 60.3 #N/A #N/A 56.6 57.0 52.3 67.5 # Days 30 30 30 30 0 0 29' 30 10 29 May 1999 66.2 66.0 63.9 60.8 #N/A #N/A 56.5 57.5 49.6 68.0 # Days 31 31 31 31 0 0 31 31 31 31 Jun 1999 66.8 66.6 64.8 60.8 #N/A #N/A 56.2 57.3 49.3 68.2 # Days 30 30 30 30 0 0 27 30 30 30 Q-2 1999 66.4 66.2 64.3 60.7 #N/A #N/A 56.4 57.3 50.0 67.9 # Days 91 91 91 91 0 0 87 91 71 90 Jul 1999 66.6 66.6 65.2 61.2 59.1 60.3 57.7 56.7 51.8 68.6 # Days 31 31 30 28 30 31 30 30 29 29 Aug 1999 66.9 66.7 65.2 59.5 58.9 60.0 58.4 57.5 50.6 68.4 # Days 31 31 26 30 30' 30 22 31 29 30 Sep 1999 66.4 66.4 64.6 59.5 58.1 59.5 57.7 58.0 50.5 68.2 # Days 30 30 29 30 30 29 29 28 20 '30 Q-3 1999 66.6 66.5 65.0 60.1 ., 58.7 59.9 57.9 57.4 51.11 68.4 # Days 92 92 85 88 90 90 , 81 89 78 89 Q-4 1998 thru Q-3 1999 Total I 66-41 65.9 64.5 60.0 59.4 60.1 57.0 57.1 52.1 67.6 !.~, Days! 3651 365 357 328 261 245 341 356 327 359 IQ-3 1998 thru Q-2 1999 (Previous 4 Quarters) # DaysI I' 365 358! 364 332 244 241 352 359 337 362 Change from Previous 4 Quarters I -0.1! 0.21 0.2 0.1 -0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 -0.1 0.3 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CN'EL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.6 65.9 64.9' #N/A 63.2 61.0 57.8 57.4 58.2 69.3 2 67.3 66.4 66.2 63.1 59.9 61.3 57.0 58.7 45.4 69.3 3 64.8 64.7 63.4 60.2 57.3 59.7 59.1 56.4 #N/A 69.1' 4' 64.0 63.9 62,6 62.1 57.2 57.9 57.6 54.4' 49.3 #N/A 5 65.9 66.0 64.5 60.2 59.1 59.5 57.1 54.4 39.9 #N/A 6 66.8 66.5 65.5 60.9 58.7 60.7 55.9 58.5 45.5 68.9 7 66.2 66.2 64.7~ 61.9 57.9 61.1 55.6 57.0 52.2 69.1 8 68.0 69.8 69.3 63.3 #N/A 63.8 59.9 56.7 50.8 69.0 9 66.9 67.1 65.3 62.0 59.0 60.4 56.6 61.0 46.7: 67.7. 10 65.0~ 65.0 63.6 61.0 57.9' 58.7 55.5 52.4 47.8 67.7' 11 67.0 67.0 65.5 60.8 61.7 60.1 59.9 51.2 51.0 68.2 12 67.3 66.9 66.4 #N/A 58.9 60.8 57.1 52.1 43.6 67.8 13 66.3 66.1 64.5 61.7 58.1 59.6 55.9 54.3 52.5 68.6 14 67.3 67.1 65.8 61.3 59.5 61.2 57.8 56.7 49.3 69.0 15 67.2 66.9 65.4 61.3~ 59.6 60.8 57.1 56.8 51.3 69.1 16 67.2 67.1 65.7 61.3' 59.1 60.9 58.5 54.3 #N/A 68.5 17 65.1 65.4 64.0 62.4 57.6 58.6 #N/A 59.8 54.8i 66.3 18 66.3 65.9 64.9 60.3 59.4 59.8 57.0 57.4 54.4 69.1 19 66.8 67.1 65.1 60.1 58.6 60.1 56.2 58.0 54.6 68.3 20 66.9 67.0 65.3 62.2 59.0 59.9 56.8 58.3 49.9 68.9 21 66.7 66.7 64.9: 60.9 58.8 59.6 56.1 55.3 49.9 68.6 22 67.6 66.9 #N/A #N/A; 59.4 60.4 59.0 58.0 55.6 68.3 23 67.4 66.6 65.3 58.9 59.3 59.6 58.1 55.8 49.4 67.9 24 65.3 65.0 64.3 60.1 57.4 58.3 57.0 55.1 48.7; 67.0 25 66.1 65.9 64.5 61.8 58.4 60.1 58.9 56.1 54.0 69.5 26 67.4 67.4 65.7 60.0 59.4 60.3 56.8 56.0 53.0 68.8 27 66.6 66.4 65.0 59.8 58.8 59.8 59.1 #N/A 47.7 69.0 28 66.8 67.1 65.4 61.8 59.2 60.8 61.0: 58.2 53.0 69.4 29 67.2 67.3 65.3 59.6 59.3 60.4 56.8 55.8 44.9 68.6 30 66.8 66.9 65.4 60.8, 58.8 59.9 57.5 54.7 54.3 68.2 31 65.1 64.8 63.4 58.2 57.5 59.0 56.7 53.5 48.7 67.2 Days 31 31 30 28 30 31 30 30 29 29 En.Avg 66.6 66.6 65.2 61.2 59.1 60.3 57.7 56.7 51.8 68.6 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N I 67.2 67.0 65.7 59.4 58.9 60.6 58.9 55.7 42.6 67.9 2 67.0 67.0 65.3 59.1 59.41 59.7 #N/A 56.2 50.1 68.3 3 66.7 66.5 65.2 58.7 58.3' 60.1 56.4 58.5 45.5 68.4 4 66.7 66.6 65.6 59.3 59.2 60.7 57.3 57.9 52.4 69.3 5 67.6 66.5 65.9 61.3 59.0 60.4 56.2 59.3 37.7 69.9i 6 67.6 67.4 65.91 60.4 60.8 61.8 60.4 59.0 51.2~ 69.0 .... 7 67.3 66.7 65.4 #N/A 58.9 60.2 59.0 56.0 45.9 66.7 8 66.6 66.1 64.7 59.5 58.6 60.1 57.3 57.7 50.2 68.4 9 66.8 67.2 65.3 60.3 59.6 60.9 #N/A 58.0' 52.3 69.2 10 66.9 66.9 65.0 60.9 59.4 61.0 57.7 59.4 46.9 68.9 11 66.8 65.8 65.1 59.6 59.8 61.3 58.2: 58.7 44.0 68.5 12! 67.0 67.5 65.2 59.5 59.4 61.8 57.6 57.0 53.0 68.7 13 67.8 67.8 #N/A 60.8 #N/A #N/A 60.9 58.7 52.0 #N/A 14 65.4 65.3 #N/A 57.7 56.2 57.4 54.7 56.5 #N/A 67.1 15 67.1 66.4 #N/A 59.1 58.6 59.5; #N/A 56.4 #N/A 68.5 16 67.2~ 67.5 #N/A 59.2 58.8 59.9 56.9 55.1 47.3 67.8 17 67.0 67.2 #N/A 59.3 59.1 59.8 58.8 56.9 47.7 68.3 18 67.2 67.3 65.2 60.1 58.8 60.0 #N/A 56.0 52.3 67.9 19 67.1 66.7 65.3 60.0 59.1 60.2 60.8 57.7 49.5 68.9 20 67.1 67.0 65.3 59.7i 62.6 59.3 58.9 59.4 59.1 69.4 21 65.3 65.2 63.3 56.9 56.5 57.1 #N/A 58.7 43.6 66.8 22 67.2 66.9 65.4: 59.4 58.8 60.3 #N/A 57.4 50.1 68.7 23 67.1 66.2 65.3 58.7 58.3 58.8 #N/A 56.8 51.8 69.0 24 66.4 66.1 64.4 57.8 56.9 57.5 57.7 54.5 44.8 68.0 25 66.8 67.0 64.8 57.9 58.4 59.3 #N/A 54.3 50.0 68.0 26 67.4 66.9 65.3 59.9 58.6 59.7 58.3 55.2 50.9: 68.4 27 67.9 67.8 67.0 59.9 59.3 61.2 #N/A 56.0 47.5i 68.3 , 28 65.5 65.3 63.5 57.3 57.1 57.7 58.5 52.2 48.1 66.2 29 66.7 66.6 64.9 59.2 58.5 58.9 59.4 56.8: 39.4 68.7 30 66.6 65.9 64.8 59.7 58.1 59.2 57.2 57.7 48.9 '68.6 31 66.3 65.9 65.2 59.7 57.6 59.8 58.0 60.7 52.0 69.1 Days 31 31 26 30 30 30 22 31 29 30 !En.Avg 66.9 66.7 65.2 59.5 58.9 60.0 58.4 57.5 50.6 68.4 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALISES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON 1 66.3' 65.2 64.7 61.2 58.2 60.1 59.3 59.3 47.1 69.© 2 66.9 66.7 65.5 60.1 59.1 60.6 57.2 58.9 49.1 69.3 3 68.2 68.3 #N/A 61.3 60.6 62.2 59.6 56.1 49.4 69.4 4 64.8 64.8 63.1 57.5 56.7 57.2 57.2 54.2 #N/A 65.6 5 63.9 63.8 62.9 55.9 55.3 55.9 54.1 55.8 48.5 67.3 6 66.8 66.6 65.5 58.2 58.3 60.0 #N/;~57.7 #N/A~ 68.2~ 7 66.6 66.8 65.2 58.9 58.2 58.7 58.0 56.2~ #N/A 69.1 8 65.7 65.9 64.4 58.8 58.1 60.2, 55.6 58.3 #N/A 68.1 9 67.0 67.1 65.5: 61.2 59.0 60.5 56.9 57.5 47.8 67.7 10~ 66.9' 67.0 64.9 65.3 58.9 59.4 59.2 55.9 #N/A 68.0 11 64.6 64.7 62.4 57.5 56.3 57.1 57.9 55.6 #N/A 65.4 12 66.3 65.9 63.8 58.4 58.1 59.2 58.3 #N/A #N/A 68.4 13 67.0 67.3 65.2 59.1 58.9 59.1 56.7 56.1 49.6 67.6 14 65.7 65.8 64.4 58.8 58.1 59.0 56.2 58.9 52.3 68.1 15 66.1 66.5 64.3 59.1 58.1 59.1 56.9 58.6 50.9 69.01 16 66.9 66.7 64.7 60.5 57.5 61.5 57.8 60.8 56.8 68.7 17 67.7 67.6 66.1 59.7 59.0 60.6 58.0 59.4 48.4 69.3 18 64.6 64.3 62.61 57.4 56.0 56.9 56.7 56.6 41.8 65.7 19' 66.4' 66.4 64.9 59.4 58.9 60.0 58.2 55.4 49.8 68.5 20 66.5 66.7 64.6 59.0 58.4 59.2 60.4 57.3 #N/A 68.0 21 66.2 66.7 65.2 58.7 58.1 60.1 56.0 60.3 51.2 68.0 22 66.7 66.9 65.3 59.5 58.9 61.6 58.5 57.6 52.4 68.4 23 66.9 66.9 65.4 58.5 58.3 60.0 58.1 59.6 52.0 69.1 24 67.0 67.2 65.2 59.3 58.1 59.4 61.0 60.2 54.6 68.9 25 64.7 64.8 63.0 57.0 56.9 56.9 56.3 57.3 41.0 66.0 26 65.9 65.4 64.2 56.7 56.4 57.7 57.5 57.8 40.4 69.1 27 66.6 66.1 64.5 59.7 57.2 58.8 54.5 56.7 44.3 69.0 28 66.0: 66.4 65.1 59.9 58.6 59.6 56.7 57.9 47.5 69.1 29 66.4 66.2 64.5 58.5 56.5 #N/A 54.9 #N/A #N/A 66.7 30 67.0 67.3 64.5 58.2 57.1 58.9 55.2 57.9 #N/A 67.5 Days 30 30 29 30 30 29 29 28 20 30 En.Avg 66.4 66.4 64.6 59.5 58.1 59.5 57.7 58.0 50.5 68.2 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July- September 1999 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Alaska Air 87374 363 AVerage 96.3 96.0 93.31 86.0 89.1 87.6 86.7 78.5~ 83.2 94.7 Count (357) (345) (338) (351) (357) (355) (349) (2) (1) (1) America West A320 21 Average 94.2 94.2 91.9 87.5 84.0 85.4 81.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (19) (19) (19) (20) 120) (20) 07) (0) (0) (0) 87373 9 Average 95.7 95.4 92.8 86.7 84.5 86.7 83.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (6) (6) (6) (S) (6) (6) (6) (0) (0) (0) 8757 58 Average 94.5 95.3 91.2 85.8 84.0 84.9 81.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (56) (54) (55) (53) (52) (53) (48) (0) (0)! (0) American 8757 327 Average 92.2 92.3 90.7 85.6 84.6 85.9 82.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A, Count (324) (309) (307) (311) (317) (316) (296) (0) (0) (0)! MD80 275 Average 100.4 100.4 99.4 92.7 92.9 93.9 90.9 87.3 84.4 102.41 Count (265) (248) (258) (255) I268) (260) (257) (2) (2) (3)! MD90 47. Average 86.2 87.0 85.7 80.4 79.9 79.8 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/Ai Count (46) (45) (47) (45) (35) (45) (18) (0) (0) Continental i87373 295Average 95.7 95.1 94.1 88.2 87.0 88.4 84.7 82.4 79.0 94.4 Count (288) (274) (277) (288) (290) (284) (279) (4) (2) (3}! i87377 240 Average 95.5 95.0 93.0 86.8 85.4 87.0 83.6 80.5 82.3 95.1 Count (225) (223) (220) (225) (230) (231) (221) (5) (2) (7) 87378 2 Average 95.9 95.6 92.2 88.5 85.5 89.3 85.6 #N/A #N/A #N/,~ Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) Delta 8757 182 Average 95.5 95.0 93.6 86.2 85.2 86.4 83.0 79.2 77.6 92.4 Count (171) (165) (166) (168) (171) (168) (165) (3) (1) (7) MD90 88 Average 92.2 91.9 90.4 83.7 82.9 85.3 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (85) (84) (83) (86) (83) (84) (86) (0) (0) (0) FedEx A300 4 Average 93.9 94.0 92.4 88.3 86.4 87.2 83.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (0) (0) (0) A310 59Average 97.9 97.7i 96.0 90.9 90.4 91.8 88.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (58) (58)i (56) (58) (58) (58) (57) (0) (0) (0) Northwest A320 443Average 95.3 94.9; 93.0 87.6 85.0 86.3 82.5 82.3 84.0 93.6 Count (428) (410)i (414) (433) (431) (427) (418) (3) (1) (6) Reno Air MD80 382 Average 97.6. 97.6 96.8 91.0 90.9 91.9 89.3 #N/A 82.1 101.7 Count (376) (354)i (356) (367) (380) (375) (372) (0) (1) (1) MD90 3 Average 86.6 86.6 85.8 79.7 79.4 79.3 77.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (3) (3)! (3) (3) (3) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 87373 180 Average 93.5 93.6 90.5 85.1 85.5 86.4 84.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (177)i (172) (168) (177) (179) (180) (173) (0) (0) (0) 87377 3 Average 92.41 92.6 88.8 81.2 82.4 83.1 80.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (3)i (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (0) (0) (0) TWA 8757 160 Average 93.4 93.2 90.3 84.0 83.1 84.1 81.0 #N/A #N/A #N/,~ Count (158) (145)i (153) (154) (156) (157) (151) (0) (0) (0) MD80 102 Average 100.2: 99.4; 97.7 89.8 90.6 92.9 90.3 #N/A #N/A 99.1 Count (99) (89); (96) (97) (99) (98) (96) (0) (0) (1) United 87373 140 Average 95.0 94.6; 92.8 87.0 86.1 87.5 84.2 82.4 #N/A 94.4 Count (137) (135) (128) (135) (137) (137) (134) (2) (0) (2) 8757 62 Average 93.7 93.6 91.8 86.1 84.8 86.6 83.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (56) (54) (54) (57) (57) (57) (55) (0) (0) (0) UPS 8757 63 Average 93.5 93.8 91.2 86.2 84.8 86.6 82.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A~ Count (61) (61.); (58) (59) (59) (59) (56) (0) (0) (0)! US Airways A319 184Average 94.5 93.4 93.8 86.5 84:7 86.7 83.4 80.2 #N/A 91.8 Count (173) (162)! (164) (171) (173) (172) (167) (4) (0) (8) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class AA July- September 1999 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Alaska Air 87374 171 Average 93.8 94.0 90.5 84.2 86.5 85.5 83.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (170) (164) (162) (167) (170): (169) (166) (0) (0) (0) America West A320 115 Average 91.6 92.0 89.4 85.7 83.2~ 83.6 80.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (115) (111) 011) 014) (112) (112) (79) (0) (0) (0) !87373 823 Average 92.9 93.0 90.0 84.9 84.3 85.4 82.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A' Count (801) (776) (773t (795)i (806) (802) (774) (0) (0) (0) 8757 l lAverage 88.7 89.4 86.7 79.8 79.8 76.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) American 8757 740Average 91.8 92.0 90.3 85.2 84.2 85.4 83.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (723) (695) (706) (714) (717) (724) (683) (0) (0) (0) MD90 28 Average 88.4 88.6 86.6 80.3 79.4 80.3 79.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (27) (28) (28) (24) (20) (26) (13) (0) (0) (0) Continental 87377 74 Average 93.2 93.3 90.5 85.3 83.9 84.6 87.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (72) (67)~ (68) (72) (73) (71) (71) (0) (0) (0) Delta MD90 352 Average 92.0 91.7 89.9 82.9 82.6 84.8 82.6 81.6 #N/A 92.7 Count (347): (336) (328): (336) (317) (346) (324) (1)i (0) (1) Reno Air MDg0 51 Average 91.3 91.0 89.2 82.4 81.3 83.5 80.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (50): (51) (48) (51) (47) (50) (44) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B7373 185iAverage 92.3 92.6 89.9 84.9 85.0 86.0 84.3 81.9 80.3 94.1 Count (183)1 (178) (175) (181) (184) (182) (178) (1) (1) (1) :United A320 343 Average 91.3' 91.4 90.5 85.7 83.8 85.6 83.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (339) (328) (318) (334) (337) (337) (328) (0) (0) (0) B757 146 Average 93.3 93.3 90.8 84.2 83.6 85.1 82.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (137) (132) (140) (139) (144) (141) (139) (0) (0) (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGI.F EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commemial Class E July- September 1999 Carder iAC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Alaska Air 87374 331 Average 90.6 91.2 88.2 82.5 84.5 83.5' 81.1 79.8 79.3 93.1 Count (321) (304) (313) (309) (322) (318) (307) (4) (3) (6)i 87377 73 Average 89.1 89.5 86.4 81.2 82.9 81.5 79.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (72) (73,) (69) (73) (72) (73) (66) (0) (0) (0)! America West 87373 818Average 91.9 92.1 89.2 84.7 83.9 85.0 81.7 78.3 81.2 92.3 Count (803) (776) (764) (792) (797) (798) (772) (1) (1) (1) American MD90 349:Average 87.9 88.3 86.6 80.8 80.3 81.2 80.4 #N/A #N/A #N/,a :Count (345) (339) (343) (333) (284) (328) (194) (0) (0) (0) Delta MD90 92iAverage 91.5 91.2 89.0 82.6 81.9 84.5 81.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A ~Count (92) (89) (88) (83) (79) (89) (83) (0) (0) (0) Reno Air MD90 621 Average 88.5 88.6 87.0 81.7 80.1 81.6 79.5 #N/A #N/A 81.7 ,Count (612) (590) (573) (589) (566) (602) (405) (0) (0) (1) S'i3uthwest 87373 843Average 91.6 92.0 89.3 84.7 84.7 85.4 81.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A 'Count (831) (809) (803) (833)! (837) (828) (817) (0) (0) (0) 87377 20 Average 89.3 89.8 85.4 81.2 81.0 81.2 79.2 #N/A #N/A #N/,a Count (20) (20) (20) (19)] (20) (20) (16) (0) (0) (0) United 8757 758 Average 91.3 91.6 89.0 83.4 82.7 83.8 81.5 #N/A #N/A 92.0 Count (743) (708) (710) (725)! (715) (730) (700) (0) (0) (2) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July- September 1999 Cartier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N !SkyWest CL60 91 Average 85.2 84.3 87.6 78.6 78.4 79.9 78.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (80) (76) (791, (48) (16/ (77) (1/ (0) (0) (0)~ E120 963 Average 80.6 82.7 82.0 80.4 83.3 79.7 84.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (891) (873) (845) (199) (629) (843) (80) (0) (0) (0) i MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July - September 1999 Cartier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N General Aviation Jet 1658 Average 90.0 88.9 91.2 84.6 86.4 86.1 84.9 77.6 #N/A 85.1 Count (1532) (1476) (1471) (982) (720) (1305) (542) (1) ~ (O)i (5) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRrER OPERATIONAL HISTORY carrier AC Type Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alaska Air AS !B7374 8,684 8,798 7,718 7,795 5,617 787377 146 MD80 270 220 4 America West AW A319 4 A320 1,184 780 6 509 667 87373 13,162 15,284 14,152 11,917 9,052 8757 318 858 1,332 205 397 ,American AA 87373 2 87378 2 8757 9,490 8,542 8,970 8,329 5,961 MD80 666 926 610 1,119 1,229 =MD90 855 Continental CO 87373 (1) 3,234 2,786 2,710 720 24 87375 (1) 1,995i 1,650 87377 868 1,562 87378 12 8757 588 659 724 298 MD80 6 4 I Delta DL 87373 1,138 614 2 8757 3,368 1,452 2,202 2,117 1,054 MD90 2,944 3,058 3,836 3,148 FedEx FM A300 16 18 12 20 :A310 384 484 486 496 361 Northwest NW A320 3,484 3,502 3,408 3,219 2,628 8757 2 Reno Air QQ MD80 4,272 4,072 4,200 4,246: 2,622 MD90 4,026 5,680 5,744 5,083 Southwest WN 87373 (1) 10,934 9,918 9,846 2,986 856 87375 (1) 6,689 6,335 "B7377 2 76 TWA TW B757 406 1,242 1,139 873 MD80 1,697 1,440 848 986 684 United UA A319 (2) 749 783 A320 (2) 2,348 2,524 2,024 1,816 1,040 B7373 (1) 950 1,332 836 503 6341 I B7375 (1) 2 49 I8757 7,856 7,766 8,274 8,617 6,093 UPS 5X 8757 504 504 476 500 378 US Airways US A319 589 A320 11 87373 880 842 1,444 1,456 482 8757 570 616i (1) Counts which separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts which separate 3.319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 A300 16 18 12 20 A310 384 484 486 496 361 A319 {1) 749 1,376 A320(1) 7,016 6,806 5,438 5,544 4,346 B7373(2) 30,300 30,776 28,990 17,582 tl,048 B7374 8,684 8,798 7,718 7,795 5,617 B7375 (2) 8,686 8,034 B7377 870 1,784 B7378 14 B757 22,694 20,805 23,220 21,205 14,756 MD80 6,910 6,662 5,662 6,351 4,535 MD90 6,970 8,738 9,580 9,086 (1) Counts that separate A319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts that separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,OO0 10,000 5,000 0 a300 [] 1995 I ~11996 ! ;E31997 ir'11998 la 1999 A310 A319 A320 B7373 B7374 B7375 B7377 B7378 B757 MD80 MD90 (1) (1) (2) (2) By Year -14- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alaska Air AS B7374 11.896 12.019 10.573 10.682 10.293 B7377 0.267 MDB0 0.370 0.301 0.005 America West AW A319 0.007 A320 1.622 1.066 0.008 0.688 1.223 B7373 18.030 20.880 19.386 16.351 16.582 'J~757 0.436 1.172 1.825 0.279 0.722 American AA B7373 0.003 B7378 0.004 B757 13.000 11.669 12.288 11.397 10.916i MD80 0.912 1.265 0.836 1.551 2.267 MD90 1.557 Continental CO B7373 {1) 4.430 3.806 3.712' 0.984 0.044 iB7375 (1) 2.742 3.048 "B7377 1.184 2.835 B7378 0.022 B757 0.805~ 0.900 0.992 0.408 MD80 0.008 0.005 Delta DL B7373 1.559 0.839 0.003 B757 4.614 1.984 3.016 2.899 1.934 MD~0 4.022 4.189 5.249 5.762 FedEx FM A300 0.022 0.025 0.016 0.037 A310 0.526 0.661 0.666 0.679 0.663 i Northwest NW A320 4.773 4.784 4.668 4.408 4.817 B757 0.OO3 Reno Air QQ MDB0 5.852 5.563 5.753 5.830 4.810 MD~0 5.500 7.781 7.860 9.311 iiii i Southwest WN B7373 (1) 14.978 13.549 13.488 4.088 1.571 B7375 (1) 9.167 11.623 B73// 0.003 0.139 TWA TW B757 0.555 1.701 1.564 1.619 MD80 2.325 1.9671 1.162 1.345 1.234 United UA A319(2) 1.030 1.432 A320(2) 3.216 3.448 2.773 2.488 1.912 B7373(1) 1.301 1.820 1.145 0.688 1.158 B7375 (1) 0.003 0.011 B757 10.762 10.609 ~ 1,334 11.803 11.267 ups 5x B757 0.690 0.689 0.652 0.685 0.692 US Airways US IA319 1.081 ;A320 0.018 'B7373 1.205 1.150 1.978 1.995 0.883 B757 0.781 0.842 (1) Counts which separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts which separate A319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: September 16, 1999 Time: 2:00 p.m. Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Replacement Monitoring System Update John Leyefle announced that on August 31, 1999, the Airport Director signed the letter of acceptance for the replacement monitoring system. This new system replaces our previous noise monitoring system which had been in place since 1979. In January 1997, the Board of Supervisors awarded the contract for the development and installation of the new system to Tracor Applied Sciences, Inc. (now BAE Systems North America) of Austin, Texas. With the completion of this contract the JWA Airport Access and Noise office now has a state-of-the-art aircraft operations and noise monitoring system which will allow us to better serve our customer groups, which include the community and the air carriers. 2. Airport Operation Statistics for August 1999 Bonnie Streeter gave an update on the August statistics. For the first time in this calendar year, our statistics show an increase in the number of passengers served during a month over the number served in the same month in the previous year. Other monthly figures that show increases over Au~oz~st 1998 levels were total operations, general aviation operations and air- cartier operations. There were decreases in air cargo tonnage, air taxi and military operations. 3. Status of the Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program Ann Gill of JWA gave an update. There are currently several series or groups of homes which are in various stages of construction. One group of twenty-two homes has been completed and is awaiting approval fi.om the building department. Construction began on another group of twenty-one homes during the tn-st part of August. A contract for the next group of twenty-two homes was awarded at the end of July and the construction materials have been ordered. Specifications are being completed now on an 182-unit apartment building; the contract for this series will be opened for competitive bid within the next two months. Thirty-three more homes are in the engineering phase, with construction expected to begin in approximately one year. -16- Noise Abatement Committee Meeting Continued Recently, the JWA Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program (SAIl AIP) received a visit from officials at San Diego International Airport. The San Diego officials are about to initiate a program to acoustically insulate about 12,000 homes within their noise impact area and were interested in learning about our methods of managing the SAH AlP. They videotaped their tour, which was conducted by Carl Braatz, the SAH AlP Project Manager: Q. Bernard Burger asked, "How far does the [JWA] program extend geographically?" A. John Leyerle replied that the 65 dB CNEL contour which defines the area of the project extends a little less than a mile from the south end of the main departure runway (19R). Q. Kevin Chun asked "What is the average cost per home [for acoustical insulation]?" A. John Leyerle explained that the Board of Supervisors has set a limit of $38,500 per home. However, recent changes in the bidding process have brought down the average cost while keeping quality high. The average cost per home since these changes were instituted is in the mid-S20,000 range. 4. Additional Questions Q. Bernard Burger explained that his home is located about ten miles from the airport. He noted that during instrument flight conditions he experiences less noise and less overflights than during times when visual flight roles are in effect. He asked why this was the case. He stated that he often experiences very low flying aircraft over his home and that the noise is often loud enough to interrupt conversation. A. John Leyerle stated that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Pilot-in Command (PIC) have jurisdiction of aircraft in flight. He described the two principle routes utilized by the FAA and the PIC on approach to JWA. The difference between Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) and Visual Flight Rules (VFR) was explained along with the way the F.4A~ handles arrivals during each of these conditions. The telephone number of the FAA's Western Regional Office and the Flight Standards District Office were offered to Mr. Burger. John explained the difference between Single Event Noise Event Exposure Level (SENEL) and Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The CNEL unit of measure is the standard which has been adopted by the Federal, state and local government for use in identifying noise exposures for land use compatibility determination. -17- Noise Abatement Committee Meeting Continued Q. Mark Esslinger asked "What is the current CNEL in [the North Tustin] area?" A. John Leyerle answered that the current CNEL is in the mid-50 decibels. Q. Toni Callaway inquired about a 1995 EIR produced by the FAA regarding an altered approach path over her area. She expressed concern about aircraft flying too low over her area. She further stated that she still is not receiving return calls from the Access and Noise Office in response to her calls. She asked what was going to be done with the noise monitoring stations from our old system, suggesting that they should be placed in areas that are experiencing noise problems. A. John Leyerle briefly explained the FAA's 1995 study. He reasserted the commitment of the Access and Noise office to return the telephone calls of everyone who requests it, and who leaves a return telephone number. As to the status of the old noise monitoring stations, John explained that they are not Y2K compliant and therefore would not be functional after December 31, 1999. 5. Next Meeting Date The date for the next quarterly Noise Abatement Committee meeting will be announced by letter approximately two weeks prior to the meeting. -18- NAC ROSTER September 16, 1999 NAM2E ORGANIZATION Toni Marie Callaway Residents of North Tustin Bernard Burger Orange Park Acres Kevin Chun City of Irvine Mark Esslinger Travis Christ County of Orange Planning Department America West Airlines Paul Seifert Continental Airlines Ravin Agarwal Continental Airlines Ann Gill Loft Peters JWA GovemmentJCommunity Relations United Airlines Fred Pena Alaska Airlines -19- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 108th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMSs) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels. Effective July 1, 1999, the numbers used to refer to the remote noise monitoring stations were changed. In the new numbering scheme, the letters "S" and "N" refer to the monitoring stations' location either to the south or to the north of the airport. The numbering and location of each monitor is as follows: Former NMS Number MONITOR STATIONS New NrMS Number Location 1 1S 2 2S 3 3S 22 4S 21 5S 24 6S 6 7S 9 8N 8 9N 7 10N Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach. 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach 324 V2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach 1918 Santiago, Newport Beach 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana 17952 Beneta Way, Tusfin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote noise monitoring station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January 1, 1999 - December 31, 1999). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne .Mrport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- FIGURE 1 JO, .,q WAYNE AiI-..~ORT STATION LOCATION MAP JOHN WAYNE 3RT E NMS - NOISE MONITORING STATION -2- 0 Noise Monitors Single Family Residential 65 dB CNEL Contour ~ Multi-Family Residential STATISITICS: Incompatible Land Use Area: 20.78 Acres or .032 square milesj Number of Dwellings: 119 Number of People: 298 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65dB CNEL Impact Area January 1999 - December 1999 Mestre ~re~e -~- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 1 1. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS October - December 1999 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (1) Total Average Daily Jet Prop Operations (2) Jet Operations October 7,555 658 1,1 36 40,741 280 !November 6,992, 796 1,025 38,243 267 'December 7,433 840 924 36,691 270 Fourth Quarter 21,980 2,294 3,085 115,675 272 Twelve Months 83,495 7,135 13,714 471,676 266 01/01/99 - 12/31/99 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) October- December 1999 0 Jet Carrier ~ 21,980 Military i 15 Prop Carrier ~i 2,294 GA Jet ~ 3,085 GA Other 87,661 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) Business Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and Business Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending December 31, 1999, 119 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an increase of 14 units in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending September 30, 1999. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AIP".) During the fourth quarter of 1999, an additional 22 residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AIP. A total of 246 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AIP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October 1, 1999 - December 31, 1999) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from' local citizens and all other sources. During the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999, the Office received 358 complaints from citizens. This is a 47.7% decrease from the 684 complaints received last quarter. It is a 18.9% increase from the 301 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 120 lO0 8O 6O 40 2O 0 102 43 23 27 3O 11 17 8 12 11 15 = 5 4 6 3 3 6 ~ 7 One household is responsible for 78% of the 102 calls from Balboa Island. -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 1/99 through 12/99 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Jan 1999 66.0 65.0 63.7 59.1 59.0 58.8 56.6 66.51 52.4 56.0 # Days 31 31 30 30 30 30 28 30 29 31 Feb 1999 66.2 65.3 64.5 59.1 59.8 59.7 56.4 66.8 52.7 56.7 # Days 28' 28 28 26 27 26 26 27 28 26 Mar 1999 66.3 65.7 63.9 59.3 60.4 58.9' 57.0 67.7 55.5 5711 # Days 31 31 31 31 30 7 30 31 29 27 Q-1 1999 66.2 65.3 64.1 59.2 59.7 59.2 56.7 67.0 53.8 56.6 !# Days 90 90 89 87 87 63 64 88 86 84 Apr 1999 66.2 66.0 64.1 60.3 #N/A #N/A 56.6 67.5 52.3 57.0 # Days 30 30 30 30i 0 0 29 29 10i 30 May 1999 66.2 66.0 63.9 60.8 #N/A #N/A 56.5 68.0 49.6 57.5 # Days 31 31 31 31 0 0 31 31 31 31 Jun 1999 66.8 66.6 64.8 60.8 #N/,~ #N/A 56.2 68.2i 49.3 57.3 # Days 30 30. 30 30 0 0 27 30' 30 30 Q-2 1999 66.4 66.2 64.3 60.7 #N/A #N/A 56.4 67.9 50.0 57.3 # Days 91 91 91 91 0 0 87: 90 71 91 Jul 1999 66.6~ 66.6 65.2 61.2 59.1 60.3i 57.7i 68.6 51.8 56.7 # Days 31 31 30 28 30 31 30 29 29 301 Aug 1999 66.9 66.7 65.2 59.5 58.9 60.0 58.4 68.4 50.6 57.5 # Days 31 31 26 30 30 30 22 30 29 31 !Sep 1999 66.4 66.4 64.6 59.5 58.1 59.5 57.7 68.2 50.5 58.0 # Days 30 30 29 30 30 29 29 30 20 28 Q-3 1999 66.6 66.5 65.O 60.1 58.7 59.9 57.9 68.4 51.1 57.4 # Days 92 92 85 88 90 90 81 89 78i 89 Oct 1999 66.1 66.1 64.4 58.8 57.4 59.9 57.9 67.5 51.0 56.1 # Days 31 30 31 30 31 29 27 30 22 31 Nov 1999 66.4 66.4 64.8 59.2 58.0 59.5 57.2 67.7 52.9 55.7 # Days 30 29 30 29 30 29 12 28 18 29 Dec 1999 65.4 65.3 65.3 59.2 56.8 60.4 57.3 66.6 53.4 56.1 # Days 31 31 31 30 30 31 29 30 22 26 Q-4 1999 66.0 66.0 64.9 59.0 57.4 60.0 57.5 67.3 52.5 56.O # Days 92 90 92 89 91 891 68 88 62 86 Q-1 1999 thru Q-4 1999 Total I 66'31 66.0 64.6 59.8 58.7 59.8 57.1 67.7 52.1 56.9 # DaysI 3651 363 357 355 268 242 320 355 297 350 !Q-4 1998 thru Q-3 1999 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total I 66'41 65'91 64.5 60.0 59.4 60.1 57.0 67.6 52.1 57.1 # DaysI 3651 365J 357 328 261 245 341 359 327 356 Change from Previous 4 Quarters I -0.~1 0.21 0.1 -0.2 -0.7 -0.3 0.1 0.1 o.oi -0.3 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION October 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON 1 66.7 66.6 65.0 59.7 58.5 59.9 57.8 68.7~ #N/A 58.1 2 64.5 64.2 63.1 58.3 55.8 58.0 56.5 65.8 #N/A 55.5 3 66.4 66.3 64.3 59.8 58.2 59.7 #N/A 69.2 44.5 58.8 4 66.4 66.4 64.3 59.2 57.8 59.4 59.8 69.2 #N/A 56.5 5 65.3 65.4 63.9 58.3 58.0 59.5 56.1 68.5 #N/A 57.9 .... 6, 65.9 65.8 64.6 59.3 58.9 61.3 58.2' 68.7 49.2 59.4 7 65.4 65.6 65.4 57.5 57.2~ 63.5 54.7 67.7 #N/A 54.9 8 66.6 66.5 65.2 #N/A 60.4 60.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.9 9 63.8 63.9 62.2 58.0 54.7 55.7 55.1 64.3 55.6 58.1 10 66.3 66.4 64.0 60.0 56.7 59.5 60.0 67.1 47.5 55.3 11 67.3 67.4 65.0 60.2 57.6 58.6 58.2 67.7 52.4 55.5 12 67.3 67.3 64.3 58.1 56.9 #N/A #N/A 67.2 53.7 54.3 13 66.2 66.3 64.3 60.8 57.0 59.7' 58.7 68.3' 54.8 56.1 14 66.8 66.7 65.1 61.0 58.1 61.5 57.0 69.1 55.0 58.2 15 66.7 66.4 64.7 60.1 58.2 60.2 60.6 69.0 48.3 57.5 16 64.5 64.7 63.3 57.0 56.5 57.7 57.5 65.8 #N/A 54.5 17 66.4 66.6 64.7~ 56.7 56.7 #N/A 56.7 66.2 50.0 54.3 18 62.7 63.0 62.6 53.8 53.5 62.2 50.0 66.1 50.6 53.0 19. 66.0 66.4 63.6 58.4 56.0 62.9 56.5~ 66.9 48.4' 54.3 20 66.1 66.1 63.7 57.9 56.5 58.4' 56.1 66.5 48.3 53.3 21 66.3 66.3 64.3 58.2 56.9 58.3 #N/A 66.9 47.7 53.9 22 68.1 67.7 66.2 60.0 58.3 60.0 57.9 67.8 #N/A 57.2 23 64.1 64.2 62.1 58.8~ 55.1 56.5 59.2 65.1 53.4 54.7 24 67.0 66.8 64.8 58.1 56.9 58.7 57.6 68.1 45.8 55.7 25 66.4 66.4 64.2 57.3 57.7 58.8 57.2 66.7 45.4 53.9 26i 65.4 65.9 .64.0 58.1 57.7 58.4 59.8' 68.2 50.3 55.9 27 66.0 66.3 64.4 59.2 58.3 59.5 58.1 68.6' 46.3 55.2 28 67.3 67.4 66.3 60.1 60.6 61.4 60.4 69.1 46.0 56.7 29 68.0 67.9 67.8 59.3 58.3 63.2 57.4 66.0 #N/A 55.2 30 62.9 62.4. 60.0 54.4 52.9 54.4 57.9 63.0 51.8 51.3 · 31 66.0 #N/A 62.5. 58.2 54.9 57.0 55.4 66.5 50.2 53.4 Days 31 30 31 30 31 29 27 30 22 31 En.Avg 66.1 66.1 64.4 58.8 57.4 59.9 57.9~ 67.5 51.0; 56.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION November 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N I 65.81 65.8 63.7 59.6 56.8 58.4 #N/A 68.4 #N/A 53.3 2 66.0 66.3 64.3 58.2 57.4 58.2 #N/A 68.7 44.0 55.2 3 67.2 66.6 64.8 59.8 58.0 59.5 58.8 #N/A 37.9 55.1 4~ 67.0 66.9 64.9 59.8 58.4 60.1 #N/A 69.3 #N/A 58.5 5 67.5 #N/A 65.8 #N/A 59.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 55.7 6 65.3 65.2 64.1 58.2 57.8 57.9 #N/A 66.0 55.9 53.9 7 67.5 67.2 65.2 60.3 59.3 60.4 #N/A 68.6 52.7 53.5 8 67.2 68.3, 66.2 60.9i 59.1 60.6 58.9 68.1 #N/A 57.5 9 66.0 66.7 65.1 60.5 58.5 59.4 #N/A 67.9 53.3 60.1 10 66.8 67.4 65.1 60.4 59.0 60.1 #N/A 68.3 49.8 57.9 11 67.3 67.4 65.6 59.3 58.3 59.7 #N/A 68.2 #N/A 55.1 12 67.6 66.9 65.4 59.3 58.4 59.5 #N/A 68.0 52.6 53.6 13 64.1 64.2 63.3 57.2 56.2 56.8 #N/A 65.7 48.2 55.1 14 66.7 66.7 65.2 58.7 58.3 59.6 #N/A 69.2 #N/A 57.1 · 15 68.0 68.1 65.6 59.3 59.360.1 59.2 67.9 48.5 55.6 16 66.1 66.8 65.2 58.8 58.9 59.6 #N/A 68.6 59.6 56.8 17 65.9 67.3 64.0 59.6 58.6 59.5 #N/A 68.8 48.31 54.4 18 66.7 66.9 65.2 60.7 58.9 61.1 #N/A 69.2 #N/A 56.3 19 67.9 67.8 66.0 61.2 59.9 60.8 #N/A 68.2 53.2 55.4 20 64.1 64.3 62.9 57.6 57.4 57.8 #N/A: 66.5 53.9 57.4 21 65.7 65.4 67.8 58.2 58.1 64.3 58.3 64.5 #N/A 57.0 22 62.2 62.4 63.4 55.5 53.0 59.2 53.8 65.1 #N/A #N/A 23 66.3 66.9i 64.2 60.3i 57.9 59.0'57.9 68.3 53.4 55.9 24 67.0 66.6' 64.9 59.1 57.1 59.1 58.1 66.3 #N/A 50.9 25 63.6 63.4 60.9 56.6 53.2 55.0 53.6 61.8 #N/A 51.7 26 63.6 63.7 61.0 56.5 54.8 55.8 #N/A 65.1 #N/A 47.8 27 64.6 64.6 62.9 57.8 56.1 57.3 54.5 65.8 54.6 53.5 28 66.9 66.8 64.8 58.0 57.3 58.3 55.7 68.6 48.8 55.7 29 67.7 67.3 65.1 58.8 58.2 59.5 57.0 67.9 53.0 51.9 30 66.5 66.8 65.6 59.9 58.5 59.5 56.2 68.4 49.3 55.1 Days 30 29 30 29 30 29 12 28 18 29 En.Avg 66.4 66.4 64.8 59.2 58.0 59.5 57.2 67.7 52.9 55.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAII.Y CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION December 1999 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON I 66.7 66.4 65.0 59.8 58.4 59.5 56.2 68.7 53.6 56.9 2 66.4 66.3 65.0 59.1 58.7 59.6 #N/A 68.2 54.9 53.6 3 60.2 60.2 67.4 56.4 49.7 63.5 46.3 62.6 #N/A #N/A 4 60.4 60.2 60.0 57.4 51.9 54.9 54.5 64.4 #N/A #N/A 5 66.9 66.6 64.4 58.7'57.6 58.0 55.9 67.3 #N/A 50.6 6 66.4 66.9 64.4 58.4 57.6 58.4 58.4 67.7 49.5 51.8 7 65.9 65.9 64.3~ 59.2 58.6 59.2 57.0 68.5 #N/A 55.8 8 65.2] 65.9 64.4 56.4 55.1 60.3 52.9 67.1 60.2 #N/A 9 66.4 66.5 64.6 59.9 58.2 59.4 65.9 68.8 50.5 53.2 10 64.3 64.2 67.9 57.8 56.0 64.3 55.1 65.5~ 55.5 58.0 11 60.5 61.1 60.8 53.1 50.9 56.5 55.1 62.9 49.3 #N/A 12 65.8 65.3 63.8 60.5 57.0 58.4'56.6 66.8 #N/A 48.2 13 66.2 66.1 64.5 63.7 58.6 59.4 56.4 68.1 48.3 54.8 14 63.3 63.4 6.5.3 60.0 55.3 60.8 51.1 #N/A 50.1 57.4 15 64.2 64.5 62.5 62.1 54.4 58.7 54.2 65.4 50.7 58.9 16 66.2 66.5 64.1 62.6 57.2 58.5 56.5 67.5 54.6 54.5 17 67.7 67.7 65.7 #N/A 60.6~ 59.9 57.9 67.7' #N/A 54.3 18 65.4 64.9 64.2 58.6 56.5 58.7 57.9 65.6 54.1 53.1 19 64.9 64.3 67.5 55.9 54.4 62.9 55.1 62.4 #N/^ 58.6 20 68.5 67.7 70.7' 57.8 56.8 62.3 59.9 63.9 51.7 58.5 21 65.9 66.2 66.1 57.2 58.0 61.7 55.0 66.1 #N/A 60.9 22 61.5 60.3 67.2 57.5 50.8 63.2 48.2 62.6 #N/A~ #N/A 23 66.5 66.1 64.7 58.5 '56.5 59.9 56.6 66.0! 52.9 54.7 24 61.0 60.3 65.0 58.5 50.1 61.2 49.2' 62.0 51.2 55.8 25 59.8 60.1 58.7 60.0 49.7 54.7 47.2 62.3 47.8 55.9 26 65.5 65.7 6317 58.6 57.3 58.8 57.3 66.1 51.6 50.0 27 64.2 63.1 67.4' 54.0 55.3 63.7 55.1 64.2 55.2 58.9 28 67.1 67.2 65.1 59.8 58.5 59.6 58.8 67.5 54.8 52.7 29 66.3 66.6 64.5 59.0 58.4 59.9 58.6 71.2 53.6 57.0 30 67.1 66.5~ 64.9 59.7 59.0 59.6 59.3 68.7 45.4 53.6 31 63.7 63.7 61.2 59.2 #N/A 57.0 #N/A 64.5 52.2 55.1 Days 31 31 31 30 30 31 29 30 22 26 En.Avg 65.4 65.3 65.3, 59.2 56.8 60.4 57.3 66.6 53.4 56.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASL'RED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A October - December 1999 Carrier AC Type ;# Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Aiaska Air B7374 378,Average 95.4:95.3 92.3 85.6 86.6 86.6 84.6 91.9 82.8 79.8 Count (324)I (303) (322) (319) (329) (319) (325) (41) (31) (41) America West A320 24 Average 92.6 92.9 90.4 85.2 83.1 84.4 81.1 87.2 #N/A 78.5 Count (19) (18) (17)' (19) (19) (19) (17) (5) (0) (7) "~7373 22 Average 93.2 94.5 91.2 84.1 84.1 85.0 82.9 89.3 78.5 83.8 Count (18) (14) (20) (20) (19) (20) (16) (2) (1)i (1) B757 33Average 94.0 95.1 90.4 84.1 83.0 82.3 79.7 89.5 #N/A 79.0 Count (29) (28) (29) (~28) (27) (27) (23) (3) (0) (1) American B757 345Average 90.9 91.3 89.2 83.8 83.1 84.5 82.1 87.3 84.5 81.1 Count (307) (295) (302) (296) (294) (299)i (277) (33) (4) (11) MDB0 516Average 98.9 99.0 98.2 91.6 91.8 92.9 90.1 97.6 85.0 83.7 Count (418) (388) (423) (423) (432) (417) (428) (77) (69) (53) MDg0 136 Average 86.9 87.4 86.2 80.9 80.5 80.8 79.8 87.4 #N/A 80.8 Count (123) (117) (123) (113) (97) (115) (57) (13)I (0) (2) !Continental B7373 206Average 95.1 94.8 93.6 87.0 86.3 87.5 84.4 91.4 83.0 81.4 Count (166) (154) (166) (164) (169) (165) (161) (34) (23) (19) B7377 348Average 94.4 94.1 91.6 84.9 83.8 85.1 83.0 92.5 86.3 79.3 Count (282) (264) (282) (278) (285) (279) (279) (48) (19) (24) ~7378 2 Average 98.2 96.7 96.1 89.7 87.0 87.8 85.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2)i (2) (2) (2) (2)i (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) Delta B757 266 Average 93.8 93.9 91.5 85.0 84.1 84.9 81.9 88.1 82.1 79.0 Count (225) (211) (221) (217) (225) (218) (216) (41) (7) (11) FedEx A310 63Average 98.4 98.2 96.2 90.6 90.0 91.5 88.0 93.0 82.9 79.0 Count (58) (57) (57)! (57) (58) (55) (58) (5) (4) (5) Northwest A319 1 Average 93.6 93.5 91.5 83.8 83.3 #N/A 80.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) A320 432 Average 94.5 94.3 92.2 86.7 84.5 85.6 82.4 89.6 88.8 79.5 Count (359) (331) (367) (352) (368) (360) (354) (53) (17) (26) Southwest B7373 179 Average 93.2 93.5 90.2 84.5 84.7 85.8 82.6: 90.4 80.0 80.7 Count (147) (137) (151) (148) (153) (150) (151)'i(20) (14) (19)i B737'7 31Average 92.7 92.61 87.9 83.4 80.8 83.2 80.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A !Count (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3): (3) (0) (0) (0) TWA B757 152Average 92.3 92.5 89.2 83.0 82.4 83.2! 80.8 86.0 81.7 80.2 Count (125) (121) (132) (124) (132) (128) (126) (16) (5) (5) MDB0 104=Average 98.9 98.9 97.1 87.9 89.8 91.5~ 89.7 99.2 83.8 83.8 Count (82) (76) (80) (79) (81) (80) (81) .(20) (19) (21) United A320 6 Average 91.7 91.9 90.9 84.5 83.8 85.2 83.5 #N/Ai #N/A #N/A Count (6) (6) (6) (6), (6) (6/ (6) (0)! (0) (0) B7373 82Average 94.1 93.8 92.4 86.3 85.4 86.1 82.8 90.4 78.2 79.3 Count (72) (70) (74) (741i (74) (71) (73) (7) (3) (7) B757 61 Average 92.7 92.8 90.3 83.5 83.0 84.8 82.5 88.4' 76.0 78.4 Count (53) (53) (54) (53)i (53) (52) (53) (7) (1) (3) UPS B757 62 Average 93.9 94.4 91.1 85.0 83.6 85.8 82.2 88.6 #N/A #N/A Count (57) (57) (55) (56) (56) (54) (54) (4) (0) (0) 'US Airways A319 1831Average 94.0 93.1 93.3 88.6 84.2 85.9 84.1 90.0 81.9 81.6 Count (138) (128) (139) (136) (138) (136) (139) (35) (7) (16) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class AA October- December 1999 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Alaska Air B7374 203 Average 92.5 92.9 89.3 83.9 85.0 84.7 82.7 89.6 81.6 78.8 ,Count (164)1 (151) (172) (169) (174) (171) (172) (22) (13) (16), America West iA320 225 Average 90.9 91.2 88.6 84.7 82.6 83.2 80.5 84.7 #N/A 78.6 Count (194) (194) (193), (193) (191) (189) (126) (26) (0) (2) B7373 669 Average 92.9 93.0 89.9 84.8 84.0 85.1 82.7 88.8 81.5 79.7 Count (570) (540) (573) (566) (578)i (563) (563) (71), (33) (43) Amedcan B757 745 Average 90.9 91.1 89.2 84.0 83.0 84.4; 82.0' 87.3 80.7' 83.7 Count (629) (570)i (644) (627) (637) (627) (613) (79) (15) (23) MD90 80 Average 88.8 89.3 87.4 81.8 80.5 82.4 80.0 87.4 81.3 81.6 Count (62) (59) (65) (62) (52) (64) (44) (10) (3) (9) Continental B7377 116 IAverage 91.6 92.1 88.7 84.0 82.6 83.8 83.2 88.6 82.0 83.8 Count (105) (101) (103) (101) (105) (99) (101) (10) (2) (2) Delta :MD90 358 Average 91.0 90.8 88.5 81.2 81.1 83.3 84.2 88.9 79.0 78.8 Count (316) (302) (322) (281) (267) (311) (271) (27) (2) (14) Southwest B7373 175 Average 92.9 93.3 89.6 84.6 84.3 85.5 83.8 89.7, 81.7 81.0 Count (150) (143) (150)' (151) (151)i (148) (150) (23) (8) (7) B737'/ 3 Average 89.4 89.9 85.9 81.7 81.8 82.1 79.4' #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (3) (3)i (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (0) (0) (0) United A320 197 Average 90.5 90.9 89.8 84.8 83.4 64.7 82.9 86.6 79.3 80.9 Count (163) (151) (168) (165) (166) (166) (162) (20) (3) (5) B757 2231Average 92.3 92.3 89.4 83.2 82.7 84.2 81.9 87.6 78.3 7713 Count (190) (185) (193) (194) (196) (189) (194) (24) (4) (9) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E October- December 1999 Carder AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON Alaska Air B7374 230 Average 90.5 91.2 87.7 82.8 84.1 83.6 81.5 90.7 79.1 78.4 ,count (212)i (207) (210) (209) (213) (201) (209) (13) (6) (6) 'B7377 471Average 88.8 89.4 86.3 81.0 82.0 82.0 80.4 88.4 79.9 78.9 Count (401) (392) (400) (390) (401) (394) (386) (62) (4) (20) IAmedcaWest B7373 776 Average 91.5 91.9 88.6 84.0 83.5 84.3 81.4 88.2 79.7 79.3 Count (679) (648) (674) (667)i (683) (667) (649) (78) (18) (35) American B757 I Average 91.4 91.5 87.9 83.2 80.8 81.1 78.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1)] (1) (1) (1) (1)i (0)l (0) (0) MD90 949 Average 87.7 88.2 86.5 81.1 80.1 81.3 80.0~ 87.4 82.4 81.1 Count (809) (771): (811) (777) (673) (780) (495) (106) (7) (29)' Delta MD90 1/? Average 90.7 90.6 88.0 81.1 80.5 82.8 80.5 87.9 87.4 80.1 Count (149) (151) (151) (136) (110) (144) (125) (22) (3) (14) Southwest B7373 846 Average 91.1 91.6 88.6 83.8 83.9 84.6 82.0 89.2 80.2 82.7 iCount (749)! (711) (748) (733) (750) (733) (724) (82) (28) (29) :B7377 21 ,Average 88.6 89.1 86.7 81.0 81.0 82.2 79.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (21) (20) (21) (21) (18) (19) (16) (0) (0) (0) United B757 816 Average 90.2 90.6 87.6 82.4 81.5 82.9 81.9 86.3 80.2 81.2 Count (705) (667) (706) (677) (680) (687) (680) (98) (17) (26) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter October- December 1999 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N SkyWest CL60 90 Average 85.7 85.4 87.0 80.1 80.4" 80.0 85.1 83.8 #N/A 83.7 Count (67) (64) (70) (40) (10) (65) (3)i (7) (0) (2)i E120 1146Average 80.4 82.8 82.1 81.1 83.5 79.6 82.1 80.6 81.7; 79.4 Count (946) (909) (929) (142) (631) (851) (79) (81) (7) (37) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation October - December 1999 Carrier iAC Type # Deps ' NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 46 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1 ON General Aviation Jet 1469 Average 89.2i' 89.0 90.3 84.6 83.9 84.9 85.3 86.5 83.5 83~8 Count (1119) (1060) (1114) (726) (574) (971) (442) (142) (14) (41) -12- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alaska Air AS B7374 8,684 8,798 7,718 7,795 7,237 B7377 1,090 MD80 270 220 4 America West AW A319 112 A320 1,184 780 6 509 1,059 B'7373 13,162 15,284 14,152 11,917i 11,986 B757 318 858 1,332 205 464 American AA IB7373 2 · B7378 >~ B757 9,490' 8,542 8,970 8,329 8,145 MDB0 666 926 610 1,119 2,285 MD90 3,191 Continental CO B7373 (1) 3,234 2,786 2,710 720 24 B7375 (1) 1,995: 2,061 B7377 868 2,491 B7378 16 :B757 588 659 724' 298 MD80 6 4 Delta DL B7373 1,138 614 2 B757 3,368 1,452 2,202 2,117 1,585 MD90 2,944 3,058 3,836 4,218 FedEx FM A300 16 18 12 20 A310 384 484 486 496 487 Northwest NW A319 9 A320 3,484 3,502 3,408 3,219 3,486 [B757 2 Reno Air QQ MD80 4,272, 4,072 4,200 4,246 2,622 MD90 4,026 ~5,680 5,744 5,083 Southwest WN B7373 (1) 10,934 9,918 9,846 2,986 1,358 B7375 (1) 6,689 8,234 B73 / / 2 129 TWA TW B757 406 1,242 1,139 1,174 MDB0 1,697 1,440 848 986 894 United UA A319 (2) 749 1,035 A320(2) 2,348 2,524 2,024 1,816 1,196 IB7373 (1) 950 1,332 836 503 791 B7375 (1) 2 55: B757 7,856 7,766 8,274 8,617 8,2901 !UPS 5X B757 504 504 476 500 502 US Airways US A319 955 A320 11 B7373 880 842 1,444 1,456 482 '~757 570 616 (1) Counts which separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts which separate A319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 A300 16 18 12 20 A310 384 484, 486 496 487 A319(1) 749 2,111 A320(1) 7,016, 6,8061 5,438 5,544' 5,752 B7373 (2) 30,300! 30,776 28,990 17,582 14,641 IB7374 8,684 8,798 7,718 7,795 7,237 ;B7375 (2) 8,686 10,350 B7377 870 3,710 B7378 18 B757 22,694 20,805 23,220 21,205 20,160 MD80 6,911 6,662 5,662 6,351 5,801 MD90 6,970 8,738 9,580 12,492 (I) Counts that separate A319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts that separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 35,000 30,000 25,O00 20,000 15,00O 10,000 I~ FI 5,000 h o, ~ ,-l~ , , J A300 A310 A319 A320 B7373 B7374 B7375 B7377 B7378 B757 MD80 MD90 By Year [] 1995 · 1996 [] 1997 El 1998 · 1999 -14- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Alaska Air AS B7374 11.896 12.019 10.573 10.682 9.921 B7377 1.490 iVlD80 0.370 0.301 0.005 America West AW A319 0.151 A320 1.622 1.066 0.008 0.688 1.452 B7373 18.030 20.880 19.386 16.351 16.425 B757 0.436 1.172 1.825 0.279 0.630 American AA ,B7373 0.003 B7378 0.003 B757 13.000 11.669 12.288 11.397 11.159 MD80 0.912 1.265 0.836 1.551 3.148 MD90 4.359 Continental CO B7373 (1) 4.430 3.806 3.712 0.984 0.033 B7375 (1) 2.742 2.844 B7377 1.184' 3.392 B7378 0.022 B757 0.805 0.900 0.992 0.408 MDB0 0.008 0.005 Delta bL !B7373 1.559 0.839 0.003 B757 4.614 1.984 3.016 2.899 2.175 MDg0 4.022 4.189 5.249 5.775 FedEx FM A300 0.022 0.025 0.016 0.027 A310 0.526 0.661 0.666 0.679 0.668 Northwest NW A319 0.014 A320 4.773 4.784 4.668 4.408 4.775 B757 0.003 ,RenoAir QQ MD80 5.852 5.563 5.753 5.830 3.597 MDg0 5.500 7.781 7.860 6.964 Southwest WN B7373 (1) 14.978 13.549~ 13.488 4.088 1.860 B7375 (1) 9.167 11.296 !B7377 0.003 0.178 TWA TW B757 0.555 1.701 1.564 1.627 MDB0 2.325 1.967 1.162 1.345 1.208 United UA A319 (2) 1.030 1.411 A320 (2) 3.216 3.448 2.7731 2.488 1.647 B7373(1) 1.301 1.820 1.145 0.688 1.082 B7375 (1) 0.003 0.016 B757 10.762 10.609 11.334 11.803 11.441 '0PS 5X B757 0.690 0.689 0.652 0.685 0.688 IUS Airways US A319 1.310 A320 0.014 B7373 1.205 1.150i 1.978 1.995 0.660 ~757 0.781 0.842 (1) Counts which separate B7373 and B7375 aircraft operations began in 1998. (2) Counts which separate A319 and A320 aircraft operations began in 1998. -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING The John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Committee did not meet during the calendar quarter between October 1, 1999 and December 31, 1999. -16- EXHIBIT B Review of John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Reports, 3rd and 4th Quarters 1999 by Van Houten and Associates, Inc. J.J. VA N HOUTEN INC. John J. Van Houten, P.E. Consulting Engineer in Acousttcs June 15,2000 Project File 2779-98 CITY OF TUSTIN Community Development Department 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 Attention: Ms. Elizabeth Binsack Subject: Review of John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Reports for the 3rd and 4th Quarters of 1999 References: 1. "Data Evaluation and Aircraft Noise Impact Study for the City of Tustin;" J. J. Van Houten & Associates, Inc.; January 8, 1990 2. "Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report for the Period: July 1, 1999 through September 30, 1999;" John Wayne Airport 3. "Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report for the Period: October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999;" John Wayne Airport' 3320 E. Chapman Ave. #323 Orange. CA 92869 9491476-0932 FAX 949/476-1023 Dear Ms. Binsack, As requested, we have reviewed the referenced quarterly reports for the noise abatement program at John Wayne Airport. Please note that, effective July 1, 1999, the noise monitoring station (NMS) at 17952 Beneta Way in Tustin was renumbered to NMS 1 ON. The following provides our findings with regard to airport operations and their impact on the City of Tustin: . . Referring to Figures 1 and 2, the average annual CNEL at NMS 1 ON was 56.8 dB for 1999 based upon data for all four quarters. This is 0.2 dB lower than the average annual CNEL of 57.0 dB for 1998. (NOTE: The noise contours for John Wayne Airport are based on average annual CNEL values measured at each remote monitoring station.) The average annual CNEL of 56.8 dB in 1999 reflects the possible stabilizing of a modest upward trend in the aircraft noise exposure measured at NMS 1 ON. This trend is illustrated in the following table: CITY OF T[JSTIN ['reject }:Jlc 2779-98 Year Average Annual CNEL 1994 56.1 dB 1995 56.4 dB 1996 56.8 dB 1997 55.9 dB 1998 57.0 dB 1999 56.8 dB o Referring to Figure 2, the number of noise complaints received from the Tustin area in 1999 appears to correlate with the average quarterly aircraft CNEL measured at NMS 1 ON, but not with the number of quarterly jet operations at the airport. As indicated in the figure, the number of jet operations increased steadily throughout 1999, but the number of complaints peaked in the third quarter and dropped significantly in the fourth quarter. o As indicated in Item 1, above, the annual average CNEL measured at NMS 1 ON was 56.8 dB in 1999. This is slightly less than the 58 dB that was estimated for the station in the referenced aircraft noise impact study for the Phase 2 Access Plan (Reference 1). AIRCRAFT NOISE CONTOURS Figure 3 provides the estimated location of the John Wayne Airport noise contours for 1999. These are based on the 1998 contours developed by the John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Office, and on data through the fourth quarter of 1999. Referring to Figure 3, it is estimated that in 1999 the aircraft-generated CNEL will range from about 60 dB to less than 55 dB. This is well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB for residential areas. USE OF QUIETER AIRCRAFT AT JWA The correlation between the increasing use of quieter aircraft at JWA and the change in CNEL within the City of Tustin has been assessed. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) classifies aircraft into three categories based on noise levels. In order of decreasing noise levels, there are Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III aircraft. John Wayne Airport has only permitted Stage III aircraft since the early 1970' s. The airport has its own classification scheme for passenger aircraft. In order of decreasing noise level, these are Class A, Class AA, and Class E aircraft. Table 1 provides the estimated number of each class of aircraft that used the airport between the first quarter of 1998 and the fourth quarter of 1999. Also provided is the measured average quarterly CNEL at NMS 1 ON. Table 2 provides the same information, but the values have been normalized to 17,000 aircraft operations (takeoffs and landings) per quarter. In this way, a correlation can be established between the quarterly CNEL and the mix of aircraft types. Referring to Table 2 and Figure 4, the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft using John Wayne Airport has increased slightly in 1999, compared with 1998. This increase in Class E aircraft was offset by a decrease in the use of the noisier Class A and Class AA aircraft. Based on data from J. J. Van Houten & Associates, Inc. CITY 0t' TtJ.$'I'IN l'rojcc! Filc 2779-98 the first quarter of 1998 through the fourth quarter of 1999, there does not appear to be any correlation between the aircraft mix and the average quarterly CNEL at NMS 1 ON. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 949/476-0932. Very truly yours, J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. // //cnu in~ngin?/')b°hnsJitVafJff°uten''P'E' . ~,' -'- Da.v,d.L. W,elandLn ~ _ JC. ~ .n ~Y la~ Fl o ~eg~n;e ~lsns oA~;;t~~c. ~li; ~nP ~1ACs°s;;~' }tt; s i I n c. J. J. Van Houten & Associates, Inc. k- < Z i.-.o :: . ~ · ~<~ .= t- < r~ LIJ O_ UJ LU Z UJ I I I / ---r- ...... ,--1 ....... "r ..... ~- ....... ~ ....... ? ....... i ....... _ _~_ ...... ~ ...................... (BP) 'i~tNO ~'o Z C) > ~,' m 58 .~- ,,, 57.5 Z o 57 -t: 56.5 IAverage Quarterly Aircraft CNEL, NMS 10N I O 56 ~ 55.5 I,... < 55 1Qtr98 2Qtr98 3Qtr98 4Qtr98 1Qtr99 2Qtr99 3Qtr99 4Qtr99 Quarter/Year 22,500 22,000 21,500 21,000 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 18,500 18,000 ITotal Quarterly Jet Operations, NMS 10N I 1Qtr98 2Qtr98 3Qtr98 4Qtr98 1Qtr99 2Qtr99 3Qtr99 4Qtr99 Quarter/Year 9O ~ 80 o z 70 · :~ 60 50 =~40 20 0 IAverage Quarterly Noise ComplaintsI 1Qtr98 2Qtr98 3Qtr98 4Qtr98 1Qtr99 2Qtr99 3Qtr99 4Qtr99 Quarter/Year Figure 2. Average Quartert.v CNEL at NMS 10N, Quarterly Jet Operations at JWA, and Quarterly Noise Complaints 6  . . ~ . >._~ w~ ~'~: ' -~ ~,' '- ~ t J. J. V~ HOUTEN & Estimated Location of 3 ASSOC~ TES, INC. Jo~ Wayne Ai~o~ Noise Conto~s. 1999 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 suo!:~eJgd0 ~l~JOj!~/' Jo jgqLunN