The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC RES 13-331 RESOLUTION NO. 13 -33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 2013 -001 BY ADDING A NEW LOCAL STREET (BELL AVENUE) TO SERVICE ADJACENT USES. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. That the City of Tustin ( "City ") and the South Orange County Community College District ( "SOCCCD ") propose a General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2013 -001 by adding a new local street (Bell Avenue) to service adjacent uses; MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2013 -001 by incorporating text allowing private for - profit non - educational uses and increase allowable building square footages within the education village (Neighborhood A) of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and adding a new local street (Bell Avenue); Development Agreement (DA) 2013 -002 to facilitate the development, conveyance, and land exchange within the boundaries of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan; and an Agreement for the Exchange of Real Property. B. That the project consists of an agreement between the South Orange County Community College District (SOCCCD or District) and the City of Tustin (City) which delineates the terms and processes associated with the exchange of the ultimate ownership of approximately 90 acres of land within the Tustin Legacy (Agreement for the Exchange of Real Property Between the City of Tustin and South Orange County Community College District). The objectives of the project are to rationalize property boundaries to create larger, contiguous land areas for the City and SOCCCD, provide for a broader range of land uses in support of the objectives of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, and enhance circulation in the Project area by improving east -west connectivity between the existing Red Hill and Armstrong Avenues. C. That to facilitate the exchange, several entitlements and implementation documents are necessary. This includes a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to add the Bell Avenue extension to the City's circulation plan and correct preexisting inconsistencies with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on April 23, 2013, by the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4223 recommending that the City Council approve GPA 2013 -001. Resolution No. 13 -33 Page 1 of 3 E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on May 13, 2013, by the City Council. F. On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS /EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS /EIR. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04 -76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS /EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. The FEIS /EIR along with its Addendum and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS /EIR, Addendum and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin. G. An Environmental Checklist has been prepared and concluded that these actions do not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEIS /EIR. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEIS /EIR. However, because some changes and additions were required to the FEIS /EIR, the City has prepared an Addendum to the FEIS /EIR. H. That the addition of Bell Avenue extension to the City's General Plan Circulation Element and correction to preexisting inconsistencies with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan are considered minor amendment and can be supported since the addition of Bell Avenue would improve the City's circulation system and would not have any significant negative impact. II. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 2013 -001 attached hereto as Exhibit 1; provided that as a condition precedent to GPA 2013 -001 becoming effective, Ordinance No. 1432 shall become effective. Resolution No. 13 -33 Page 2 of 3 1 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 13th day of May, 2013. ATTEST: ,IEFF City e C° PARKER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) ELWYN A. URRAY, Mayor I, Jeffrey C. Parker, City Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 13 -33 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 13th day of May, 2013, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Murray, Puckett, Nielsen, Gomez, Bernstein (5) COUNCILMEMBER NOES; None (0) COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None (0) COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT None (0) ,/ JEFF" " PARKER CI , • E °K �� Resolution No. 13 -33 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit 1 of Resolution No. 13 -33 General Plan Revised Pages TABLE LU -2 DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY/DENSITY STANDARDS MAJOR LAND USE GROUPINGS MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE OR MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO (a) EFFECTIVE DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE OR AVERAGE FLOOR AREA RATIO (b) LAND USE DESIGNATION AND SUMMARY DESCRIPTION MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (d) (d) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Low density detached and attached dwellings at a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre with an average of 3.25 persons per dwelling unit. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Medium density detached and attached dwellings at a maximum of 8-15 dwelling units per acre with an average of 2.73 persons per dwelling unit. MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - medium -high density dwellings of 16-25 dwelling units per acre with an average of 2.12 persons per dwelling unit. TRANSITIONAL /EMERGENCY HOUSING - Adaptive reuse of military dormitory type structures for emergency housing, single occupancy housing, or congregate care with an average of 32 persons per acre. COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS - A variety of industrial, research and development, professional office, retail, commercial recreation, and specialized employment and merchandising uses at an average floor area ratio of .5:1 which can be increased under special circumstances. Residential uses are permitted at 16-25 dwelling units per acre with an average of 2.12 persons per dwelling unit. INSTITUTIONAL /RECREATIONAL USES - A wide range of public and quasi - public uses including educational facilities, public and private schools, colleges, neighborhood, community and regional parks, child care centers, and governmental /social service facilities. TRANSPORTATION — — TRANSPORTATION - Consists of major and primary arterial roadways and railroads. (a) Maximum allowable level of development standard for individual parcels of land. (b) Assumed overall standard level of development. Since the development which has occurred to date has not reached the maximum allowed level of density or intensity, future development is expected to be less than the maximum. Therefore, an effective level of density /intensity is used when projecting total future dwelling units /population for residential development and future square footage for non - residential development where floor area is used as a measurement of building intensity. (c) Maximum density in dwelling units per acre is prescribed by individual Planned Community documents. Effective dwelling units per acre for low, medium, and high density residential is 4.485, 11.834, and 17.39, respectively. (d) Maximum and effective dwelling units per acre and floor area ratio described in MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/ Reuse Plan • e ! ° - - - • ., • • - , .as amended CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 32 JUNE 17, 2008 However, individual planning areas and specific types of commercial business uses may be permitted to have a higher average floor area ratio. In addition, increased intensities may be permitted where development capacity is transferred from one area to another in accordance with the provisions of the Specific Plan, In addition, the floor area ratio may increase up to 2.0 on certain building sites as long as allotted square footage for a Planning Area is not exceeded, as defined in the Specific Plan. Residential density ranges of 15 -25 dwelling units per acre may be permitted in certain commercial and business areas within the Specific Plan land use designation at a population density range of 34 to 53 persons per acre. o Institutional/Recreational Uses which provide for a wide range of public and quasi - public uses distributed within the Specific Plan area would be permitted including educational facilities, public and private schools, colleges, neighborhood community and regional parks and support facilities, child care centers, and certain governmental/ social service facilities. Other uses (such as residential for purposes of housing persons related to an institutional use) which support institutional and recreational uses may be permitted. The average standard will be a floor ratio of .20:1 with higher average floor area ratios permitted for specific institutional/ recreational uscs.Typical intensity of development for all institutional /recreational uses will be a floor area ratio of .38:1 to .59:1, subject to restrictions imposed by the Specific Plan. o Adequate right -of -way for major arterial roadway extensions are also accommodated in the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan designation. Major arterial roadways serving the MCAS Specific Plan include Jamboree Road, Red Hill Avenue, Barranca Parkway, Tustin Ranch Road, Warner Avenue, and Edinger Avenue. Tustin Ranch Road will need to be extended to Von Karman to connect Edinger Avenue to Barranca Parkway. Warner Avenue will need to be connected between Red Hill Avenue and Jamboree Road. Transportation Designation CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 43 JUNE 17, 2008 TABLE C -5 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY PLAN Link Classification Link Classification Armstrong /so Loop Rd N Secondary Holt s/o 17th Secondary Armstrong s/o Warner Secondary Holt s/o Irvine Blvd. Secondary Armstrong n/o Barranca Secondary Irvine w/o Yorba Major (A) Barranca e/o Red Hill Major Irvine w/o Prospect Major (A) Barranca w/o Von Karman Major Irvine e/o Prospect Major Barranca w/o Jamboree Major Irvine e/o Holt Major Irvine e/o Newport Major (M, A) Bell e/o Red PO ties ccith r,il Irvine w/o Red Hill Major (M, A) Irvine w/o Browning Major (M, A) Browning s/o Irvine Secondary Irvine w/o Tustin Ranch Major (A) Browning s/o Bryan Secondary Irvine e/o Tustin Ranch Major Browning n/o Nisson Secondary Irvine w/o Jamboree Major Browning s/o Nisson Secondary Jamboree n/o Tustin Ranch Rd. Major Bryan e/o Newport Secondary Jamboree s/o Tustin Ranch Road Major Bryan w/o Red Hill Secondary Jamboree s/o Portola Major Bryan w/o Browning Secondary Jamboree s/o Irvine Major (A) Bryan w/o Tustin Ranch Primary Jamboree s/o Bryan Major (A) Bryan w/o Myford Primary Jamboree s/o El Camino Major (A) Bryan w/o Jamboree Primary Jamboree s/o Walnut Major Jamboree s/o Edinger Major Del Amo s/o Edinger Secondary Jamboree s/o Warner Major East Connector s/o Edinger Secondary Loop Rd e/o Red Hill Secondary Loop Rd N e/o Armstrong Secondary Edinger w/o Del Amo Major Loop Rd w/o Tustin Ranch Secondary Edinger w/o Red Hill Major Loop Rd N e/o Tustin Ranch Secondary Edinger e/o Red Hill Major Loop Rd s/o Warner Secondary Edinger w/o Tustin Ranch Major Loop Rd S e/o Tustin Ranch Secondary Edinger e/o Tustin Ranch Major Loop Rd S e/o Armstrong Secondary Edinger w/o Jamboree Major Edinger e/o Jamboree Major Main w/o El Camino Real Primary Main e/o El Camino Real Primary El Camino s/o lo Collector Main e/o Prospect Secondary El Camino s/o Main Collector Main e/o Newport Primary El Camino e/o Newport Secondary Primary El Camino e/o Red Hill Secondary McFadden w/o Williams Primary El Camino e/o Browning Secondary McFadden e/o Williams El Camino e/o Tustin Ranch Secondary El Camino e/o Myford Primary McFadden w/o Walnut Primary McFadden w/o Newport Primary 1 0 w/o Yorba Primary P' e/o Yorba Primary Myford s/o Irvine Secondary 1„ w/o Prospect Primary Myford s/o Bryan Secondary 1 ,,c w/o Newport Primary Myford s/o El Camino Real Secondary Mydord n/o Walnut Secondary Harvard n/o ICD Secondary Harvard s/o ICD Primary Harvard n/o Warner Primary CITY OF TUSTIN GENERAL PLAN 31 CIRCULATION ELEMENT JUNE 17, 2008 evae -nr-tiTil,c, rut q 11.0110)1 (1_1.17 colts A. naaSI a adoaa, Eontcrn Tronaportntton Corridor Mlianmcnt is diagrammatic only. NORIll not to scale SOURCE: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.. City of Tustin GENERAL PLAN — Apre 18, 2006 rypeeM March 24 201 l warm Major (8 lames) =yam Major (6 lanes) mamma Modified Major (6 lanes) a.AOaa.n Primary (4 lanes) ornsw nun' Modified Primary (4 lanes) Sec 'Mary (4 or 2 lanes) fsVdtR69 Augmented Roadways M"SO te" City Boundary WS ! I Mr Planning Arca Boundary -- •C--'• Collector (2 lanes) Figure C -2 Arterial Highway Plan T NORTH not to stale SOURCE: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. GENERAL PLAN • February 22, 2205 ItPdatrd sate, n, min LEGEND Clan I "see City Boundary l�s Class B • — Planning Area Class IR * School Site County Resional ** Perk site Bashed line indicates potential route. Figure C -5 Master Bikeway Plan