HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 HISTORIC PROP'S 08-16-99DATE:
AUGUST 16, 1999
inter-Com
NO. 9
8-16-99
TO:
FROM'
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES WITH PLAQUES
SUMMARY: The Cultural Resource Advisoo~ Committee has recommended that the City implement a
program to designate historic properties with plaques. This report serves to provide the City Council
with a general overview of the Committee's recommendations pertaining to the proposed program.
Should the Council wish to support a plaque designation progra~n, it wouM be appropriate for the
Council to provide direction regarding its implementation.
RECOM'MENDATION
That the City Council provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of a plaque
designation program.
FISCAL IMPACT
City Council direction regarding the plaque designation program is being requested at this time;
therefore, no impacts to the General Fund are anticipated. The fiscal impacts associated with the
implementation of a plaque designation program are specifically related to the type of program
implemented. Should the Council direct staff to implement the Cultural Resource Advisory
Committee's recommended program, costs would be borne by the property owner and there
would be no direct fiscal impacts to the City.
DISCUSSION
in October of 1997, the Cultural Resource Advisory Committee identified a plaque designation
program as one of their medium priority goals. At the January 21, 1998, April 22, 1998, and April
19, 1999 meetings, the Cultural Resources Advisory Committee discussed the potential
implementation of an historic property plaque program in Tustin. The Committee also requested
that staff contact other cities and the County to obtain information about other existing plaque
programs.
Staff contacted the County of Orange and the cities of Orange, Pasadena and Vallejo and
Charleston, South Carolina. Each of these communities follows a different, procedure, in some
communities, the plaques are provided to the property owners at no cost. The program proposed
for Tustin, however, would be completely voluntary and property owners would be responsible for
purchasing the plaques. In most of the communities surveyed, property owners are responsible
for installing and maintaining the plaques.
City Council Report
Plaque Designation Program
August 16, 1999
Page 2
The Community Development Department also consulted with the City Engineer to obtain
preliminary input on the feasibility of placing plaques in the sidewalk or having the City install the
plaques on private property. Given liability and maintenance concerns, the Public Works
Department recommended that the plaques be installed by property owners on private property.
Purpose of a plaque designation program
The purpose of a plaque designation program is to recognize Tustin's historic properties, educate
the public, increase public interest in historic preservation, and promote community pride.
Cultural Resource Advisory Committee Recommendations
The Cultural Resource Advisory Committee has made the following recommendations pertaining
to a plaque designation program:
· Eligibility
All properties listed in the Tustin Historical Resources Survey will be eligible for nomination
to the plaque designation program.
· Nominations
Any Tustin resident or business will be able to nominate an eligible property for the plaque
designation program using a nomination form developed by City staff. The program and a
request for nominations will be advertised through press releases, direct mailings, and
Tustin Today. Specific reasons for the particular nomination should be provided on the
nomination form.
· Selection Process
The Cultural Resource Advisory Committee and staff will review the nominations to
determine eligibility, and award certificates and provide plaque installation instructions to
the property owners. Properties in disrepair or with significant code violations will not be
selected for the program.
· Fabrication
A property owner would not be obliged to purchase and/or display a plaque. However,
property owners who elect to participate in the plaque designation program must use the
specified design and will order their plaques directly from a designated manufacturer. The
Committee and staff will select the manufacturer by obtaining at least three informal bids
and contacting references.
· Costs
The cost of the plaques should be in the range of $150 to $200. Property owners will be
responsible for the cost of the plaques and shipping and handling.
City Council Report
Plaque Designation Program
August 16, 1999
Page 3
· Design and Copy
The design of the plaques will be uniform and established by the Committee and staff in
consultation with the chosen manufacturer. The Committee and staff will designate the
type of information to be provided on the plaques, such as date of construction, property
name, etc. The total amount of copy will be kept to a minimum. Property owners will
obtain, approval for the copy from the Committee and staff.
Logo
Every plaque will be identified with an identical logo. The logo will be selected through a
design contest open to the public and judged by the Committee. In areas with sidewalks
and cUrbs, the logo could also be painted on the curb face to clearly identify a property
that has a plaque.
Placement and Installation
The plaques will have to be placed on private property and could be mounted on the
building, a wall or fence or a pedestal structure at the discretion of the property owner. If
the plaque is placed on a pedestal, the City will provide a standard detail for construction
of the pedestal. To encourage uniformity and visibility, the City will work with the property
owner to determine the preferred placement location(s).
Miscellaneous Parameters
There will be no limit as to the number of eligible historic properties designated with
plaques through the program.
Existing plaques will not be affected by the new program. Property owners may install
different plaques, but they would not be part of the formal program.
Alternatives
Staff has identified the following three alternatives for the City Council's consideration:
Alternative 1: Provide direction that a plaque designation program be implemented in the manner
recommended by the Cultural Resource Advisory Committee.
Alternative 2
Provide direction that a plaque designation program be implemented in a manner
recommended by the City Council. (Under this alternative, the Council would
provide specific program parameters that differ from the Cultural 'Resource
Advisory Committee recommendations).
Alternative 3 Provide direction that no plaque designation program be implemented at this time.
City Council Report
Plaque Designation Program
August 16, 1999
Page 4
Should the Council direct staff to implement a plaque designation program, staff will develop
specific parameters for the program and a more detailed procedure that will be developed in
consultation with the Cultural Resources Advisory Committee.
Scott Reekstin
Associate Planner
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Director of Community Development
SR:kbm\ccreports\Plaques Report.doc