Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11 J.W. NOISE REPORT 06-15-98
~TE: JUNE 15, 1998 6-!5-98 Inter-Com TO' FROM' SUBJECT: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY 3IANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT jOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John H~ayne Airport. Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the thh'd and fourth quarters of 1997. The average noise levd measured at ntonitor#tg station 3I-7, located at Cohtmbus. Tustin Middle School slightly decreased durhtg the third arid fourth quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the CiO; Cou/'ty attd State criteria of 65 dB Commuttity Noise Equivalent Len,el (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOS~M_ENDATION Receive and file report. FISCA.L IMPACT The City retains the acoustics consulting firm of J.J. Van Houten and .~sociates, Inc. to review JWA Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports. The costs for such reviews are annually included in the Community Development Department budget. mscuss o Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne .-'drport prepares a Noise Abatement Pro,am Quarterly Report and transmits a copy of the report to the City. of Tustin. Twice a year the consultant Prepares a report, which summarizes t-,vo qum-terly reports. Attachment 1 contains the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of 1997. Attachment 2 contains the summary report prepared by the noise consultant. A brief overview of the information contakned within.these attachments follows. Measured Noise Levels During the third quarter of 1997, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (R/MS) t,7, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 56.4 dB. Tiffs is 0.2 dB less than the City Council Report JWA Noise Abatement Q~.__,erly Reports June 15, 1998 Page 2 four previous quarters. For comparison, the CNrEL was 0.7 lower (55.7) during the third quarter of 1996. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the average CNEL was 53.6. This is 2.5 less than the four previous quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was 3.6 hitcher (57.2) during the fourth quarter of 1996. All measured noise levels are below the City, County and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for · · residential areas. Noise Complaints During the th/rd quarter of 1997, there were 29 Tustin/Orange complaints compared with 47 for the san~e period during 1996. During the fourth quarter of 1997, there were 29 Tustin/Orange complaints compared xvith · 87 for the same period during 1996. The number of complaints remained the same during the third and fourth' quarters, even though there were fewer jet operations during the last quarter. There is no correlation between the number of complaints and the total quarterly jet operations particularly during the last quarter. TTpe and Mix of Aircraft Related to Noise Levels During the third quarter of 1997, the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft decreased and the percentage of noisier Class A aircraft increased compared v¥Sth the same period in 1996. The average CNEL for the th/rd quarter of 1997 was slightly hi~er than the same period during 1996. During the fourth quarter the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft noisier Class A aircraft slightly decreased compared with the same period in 1996. The average CNEL for the fourth quarter was noticeably lower than the fourth quarter of 1996. The percentage of quieter Class E aircraft at John Wayne ,a2rport has remained fairly consistent since the 4th quarter of 1996 (about 36%). However, variations in aircraft mix do not correlate with changes in the average quarterly CNrEL. Therefore, an increase in the use of quieter Class E aircraft does not necessarily result in a decrease in the average quarterly CNEL. City Council Report JWA Noise Abatement Qum,crly Repons June 15, 1998 Page 3 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. Minoo Ashabi Assistant Planner Community Development Director Attachments 1. John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 1997 - September 30, 1997 and October 1, 1997 - December 31, 1997. 2. Review of John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Pro.am Quarterly Reports, 3rd and 4th Quarters 1997 (Van Houten and Associates, Inc.) mazairport\jwa3&497ma-doc J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. John J. Van Houten, RE. Consulting Engineer in Acoustics David L. Wieland Principal Consultant May 15, 1998 Project File 2779-98 CITY OF TUSTIN Community Development Department $00 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92680 Attention: Ms. Elizabeth A. Binsack Subject: Review °f John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Reports, 3rd and ~,th Quarters 1997 .References: 1. "Data Evaluation and Aircraft Noise Impact Study for the City of Tustin," J.j. Van Houten and Associates,. Inc., January 8, 1990 2. "Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report for the Period:July 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997," John Wayne .Airport 3. "Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report for the Period: October 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997," John Wayne .Airport Dear Ms. Binsack, As requested, we have reviewed the referenced quarterly reports for the noise abatement program at John Wayne Airport. The following provides our findings with regard to airport operations and their impact on the City of Tustin: 2691 Richter Avenue Suke 108 Ir'vine, CA 92606 714/476-0932 FAX 714/476-1023 1. Referring to Figures l and 2, the average annual CNEL at station M7 is 55.9 dB for 1997. This estimate is based upon data for the full year. This is 0.9 dB lower than the average annual CNEL of 56.8 dB for 1996. (NOTE: The noise contours for John Wa)me Airport ore based on average annual CNEL values measured at each remote monitoring station.) 2. Referring to Figure 2, the number of noise complaints decreased in the third and fourth quarters of 1997. The average CNEL was about constant through 1997. However, the decrease in CITY OF TU£TIN Project File 2779-98 . complaints does correspond with the decrease in total quarterly jet operations during the same time period and in particular during the lasi quarter. As indicated in Item 1, above, the annual average CNEL measured at station M7 is 55.9 dB based on information through 1997. This is 12.1 dB less than the 58 dB that was estimated for the station in the referenced aircraft noise impact study for the Phase 12 Access Plan (Reference 1).. AIRCRAFr NOISE CONTOURS In 1988, an exterior aircraft noise monitoring effort was conducted throughout the City of Tustin by the John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement O,~ce and byJ. J. van Houten & Assbciates, Inc. (Reference 1). Aircraft-generated single event noise exposure levels (SENEUs) were measured at twelve locations in Tustin over a five month period. As a result Of this effort, noise contours were developed for John Wayne Airport as they impact the City of Tustin..Although the shape of the contours does not change (since flight tracks are fixed), the value of the noise contours does change with different levels of operations at the airport and different mixes of aircraft. Figure 3 provides the approximate location of the John Wayne Airport noise contours for 1990 based on measurements obtained at monitoring station M7 throughout the year. Referring to the figure, the community noise equivalent level (CNEL) ranged from 53 to 59 dB in the City of Tustin, with a CNEL of about 55 dB at station M7. Based on data through 1997, the annual average CNEL at station M7 is 55.9 dB. The existing and future Phase 2 contours (based on 1997 data) are provided in Figure& Referring to the figure, it is estimated that in 1997 the aircraft-generated CNEL ranges from 54 to 60 dB. This is well below the City., County, and State criteria of 65 dB for residential areas. USE OF QUIETER AIRCRAFt.AT J%VA As requested, we. have analyzed the correlation between the increasing use of quieter aircraft at jWA and the change in CNEL within the City of Tustin. The Federal Ax4ation Administration · (FAA) classifies aircraft into three categories based on noise levels. In order of decreasing noise levels, there are Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III aircraft. John Wayne Airport has only permitted Stage III aircraft since the early 1970%. The airport has its own dassification scheme for passenger aircraft. In order of decreasing noise level, these are Class .as Class A.& and Class E aircraft. Table 1 provides the estimated number of each class of aircraft that used the airport between'the first quarter of 1996 and through 1997. Also provided is the measured average quarterly CNEL at monitoring station MT. Table 2 provides the same information, but the values have been normalized to 17,000 aircraft operations (takeoffs and landings) per quarter. In this way, a correlation can be established between the quarterly CNEL and the mix of aircraft types. 2 J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES. INC. CITY OF TUSTEq Project File 2779-9g Referring to Table. 2 and Figure :5, the percentage of quieter Class E aircraft using John Wayne Airport has remained fairly consistent since the 4th quarter of 1996 (about 36%). The slight va'iations in aircraft mN do not seem to correlate with changes in the 'average quarterly C:NEL. That is, an increase in the use of quieter Class E aircraft does not mean that the average quarterly CNEL will decrease. For example, the percentage of Class E aircraft operations was ' . 30.2% for the third quarter of 1997. However the average CNEL for the quarter was about the same as through the year (55.7 dB for the Srd quarter vs. 55.8 for 1997). If you have any questions, please cbntact the undersigned at 949/476-0932. Very truly yours, J.j. VAiN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. C0nsu) t~g E~ginee~ iPn' ~ouJtics' mjscC:\l°tus\w°rk\w°rdpr°\pRoJECTS\2775-99\2779rl .lwp J. J. VAN HOUTEN & ASSOCIATES. INC. Z 0.. uJ Z -'1- 0 · Z 0 0 0 J 0 N J 0 Z 'W 0 (aP) "I~iNO ._1 ILl Z }:::::.:!{ . 80 LU 60 - z ~' 40 O c~ 20 0 · 25 20 o --~,15 o ~__10 0 $ 0 ~ 100 .I E o '80 · ~ 60 · 40 0 20 o I Average Quarterly Aircraft CNEL, M71 3Qb96 1Qtr96 2Qtr96 4QtrgS 1Qtr97 2Qtr97 Quarter/Year 3Qff97 4Q~97 ITotal Quarterly Jet Operations, M7 J 1Qtr96 2Qtr96 3Qtr96 4Qtr96 1Qtr97 2Qtr97 3QtJ'97 4Qtr97 Quarter/Year I Average Quarterly Noise ComplaintsI 1Qtr96 2Qtr96 3Qtr96 4Qtr96 1Qtr97 2Qtr97 3Qtr97 4Qtr97 Quarter/Year Figure :2 Average CNEL, Total Operations and Noise Complaints for 1996 through 1997 City of Tustin (CNEL and operations are for monitoring station M7) M-7 5 5~ 5 5' i 53 // / II / . II /" // ~ /I / i I1- / // .. / // ,. ~ // /'~.../ // , . Figure 3. Approximate Location of John Wayne Airport · Noise Contours, 1990 M-7 6O 59 58 57 _~' ,....:¥_~ 5 5' 54. 11 r' "~ Il / / II ... / II / / // t // /',../' // Figure 4. ApProximate Location of John ~Zayne 8 I spu~snoq/ SNOI.LV'cl=IdO ! -.IV'dO, IV '-']0 ~FISIAInN 0 :il { { ~ ' ~ { ~ I I IFig 1 -' ". -~¥s~ ~ ;--~-'-- · ~.~,. , ~ 3.: . .... ; ,,~ 0 f~:t 2.500 5.000 · : i :--.~, / :-, :'-'?~.,. 'R-..',-u ..;:-' ,":~..'" .v'.> i ~ ' : '"' ~ -' ~' %*' "~ '~'-- -~-,~ - .-x. .-',-.' \ .: '.'/. · : g. i :.,~' '-z '- '"--'-~", "-. ', -'"W ',-" .' ~' ;--~ .':/'! ,' ,, ~ ! .: s-----.~; , -.,, /: ...... , . t<, i!.5.-;~' ',.' X"',//.;;-'t" '~, -~.c:.-, ~- { - ,~. -,.,, ,-'.,<:-::~-~ '--.. --a.~:.~ ./ 7',1 · "-~'.,'%. '% t ..d ~, · .-' % '.:' ·/ · ~'~. ~ .."/ !.~'--?.... ./ "~ ' '-- .'"> ~. -' '~L .~./,-NN ,- / % '% ..-'~ ., %-. . .-' ~. / . ". /~- '%. '.y' ./'N. ,, .' /' . ,.' / · / ,'.,X .-' / ...-' · .' 'x7 ,/,.;',"'y< C-' ?.,., ,..'s,., /- -.,, //' .'"-/.,"..'K~ ."-, ".~:< 4/ /,..'."", .... ':-, / .: ;% / .-,_~.. ~ /% '"-.,..,;"'-./"~ " ; ../ MESTRE GREVE A~T'ES II JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 1997 ANNUAL 60, 65, 70 AND 75 CNEL NOISE CONTOURS JOFL%' WAY'NE NOISE ABATEMF~fr PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: JUly 1, 1997 through September.30, 1997 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFOi~N'L~ California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: O.B. Schooley Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County /NTRODUCTION .. This is the 99th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics-Noise Standards). Eff~tive lanuary 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John waYne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE LMI:'ACT SUM2MARY Calms' Aeronautics Pr%re'am has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's ~-'ports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise. Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise 'Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote monitoring Stations (RMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Aha, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: · MONITOR STATIONS RMS-i: Golf Court, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach RMS-2:20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Aha RMS-3' 2139 Annivers~y Lane, Newport Beach . tLMS-6: ' 1131 Back Ba.v Drive, Newport Beach RMS-7: 17952 Beneta Way., Tustin RMS-g: RMS-9: RMS-21: RMS-22: RMS-24: 1300 S. Grand Avmue, Santa Ana 17372 Eastman Strut, Irvin¢ 223 Nata. Newport Beach 2338 Tustin Ave., Ncwprm Beach 1918 Santiago, Ncwt>o~ Beach Figure 1 shows the A/rpon's 'Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 1996 - September 30, 1997). The Figure 1 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with Iohn Wa2m. e Airport. CN~ values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utili:,ed to calculate the land area acreages; number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". ~G:jw QUARTERLY'REPORT 1/26/98 -1- D~vE =IGURE 1 BRISTOL ST~ E_--';': ,.~.bTH LEGEND Sinftle Family Resid~ntiaI Muld-Fam~v Reeid~ntial IncOmpatible Land Use Area: 26.9 acr~ or 0.043 squar~ mil~ Number of Dwellings: 118 Numbs- of P~pla: 296 (Ba~ed on 2.5 l~opl¢ per D. U.) JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65 dB CNEL IMPACT AREA OCTOBER 1996 - SEPTEMBER 1997 JOHN wAYNE AIRPORT AIRCR.~ TtL~-FIC SUMMARY The. Airport tr~fi=ic s~,mmary for this quarter is sho~ in Table 1 and Figure 2 below. Ah' Carrier opc,,-adonal count historic= and avcr~4c daily departure counts arc ilIusn-atM in Tables 9 & 10. TABLE I LANDEqG AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July- Seotember 1997 Jet Pr. opelIer Business (i)' Total (2) Average Daffy Month/Quarter Ah' Carriers Air Carriers Jet Aircraft .Operations Jet Operations July 6,854 1,200 1,159' 44,769 258 . August 6,802 1,188 1,027 41,755 252 September 6,440 · 1.202 1.035 36~442 249 Third Quarter 20,096 3,590 3,221 122,966 253 PREVIOUS 12MONTHS: 80,151 20,I28 11,279 443,314 . 250 10/01/96 - 09/30/97 ':.¥ '.. :.:'. · · NOTE: (2) Business $~,. figur~ inclu& a 5% facu~r for .o~--~ons not idcnti~cd by the YvVA nois~ monitor stations. Counts in ~this column are based .upon records provided by the local FAA. representatives. RGURE 2 QUARTERLY A/RPORT TRA. FRC SUMMARY (LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS) Jet Carrier ~ 20096 · · Military 35 Prop Carrier -~ 3590 Business Jet -~ 3221 · GA Propeller 96024 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 I 120OOO ~G:jw QUAKTERLYREPOKT 1,'2&Dg -3- COM~,IL~'N~TY NOISE 1 IVAJ..ENT LEVELS The monthly, qu .arter.ly and twel.ve month CommuniLy Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) av.,era~e values for a_-'tc.h monitor stanon are shown tn Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shorn in Tables .~ th~roumh 5. Insu~cient dam is indicated by "0.0" entries in each ~ble. - Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and Business Jet akcrar2 are showu in Tables 6 through 8. For the m-e!Ve month period ending September 30, 1997, 118 dwelling units in Santa Ana HeiSts were in the '~Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL confour); this represents an increase of 1 ~mit in the number of dwe~2ing units in the '2%isa Impacted Area" fi.om the previous twelve month period ending June 30, 1997. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive properly..in the ~'Noise Impact .~'ea": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the.County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." 'As part of the. Coun .ty's Santa Arm Heights 'Land (.isa Compatibility ?ro_mmu, approximately 77 general _a_a=wiculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard,'Acacia and ' Birch Str~ were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. 'Each property, was individually sold and subsequently, convened to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have'b~n purchased or othemise made compatible through the Count,/s Purchase Assurance Pro~ram' Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In Sap[ember 1993, the F.4~a, appr'~ved a m-ant to find a voluntary, acoustical insulation program rifled 'Santa Aha Heights Acoustical Insulation P-rom' (~SAH Al?'). During the third quarter no additional residences have been made compatible throug~ the Count's SAH AJ?. A total of 204 residences in Santa Ana HeiSts_ have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the' Court .ty's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Pro_m-am, Acous'd~.~ul~on Pro_mm or SAIl AIP. ' TELEPHONE COM]PLa, INT CALLS (Juhr.- September 1997) The Airpoffs Access and Noise Office receives and inv~-figates noise calls and complaints from local ckize~ and ail other sources. During the third quarter of 1997, the Office received a total of 1,410 complaints fi.om local citizens, a 71% increase fi.om the 1,002 complaints received during the previous quarter and an increase of 260% from the 391 compIaints received during the same quarter of 1996. Figure 3 show~ the d/su'ibut/on'of the quarterly teIephone calls and complaints fi.om local communities. FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY TELEPHONE CALL AND COMPLAINT SUMMARY RG:jw QUARTERLYKEPOKT Tustin ' Santa Aha S.A. Heights Costa Mesa West¢liff Ea~d31uff Balboa ® e Other Areas ~129 1~7 88 ~ 1000 ~ ! I I i I *Tus tin/Orange **Balboa/Corona Del Mar . 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS ~-~O~e caller was responsible for 48% of the calls. TABLE 2 LONG TERM Aircraft CNEL from 10/96 throuRh 9/97 ~1 =2 24 6 7 8 9 OCT. 1996 66.5 65.9 64.8 #DAYS 31 31 31 NOV. 1996 65.7 643 64.6 # DAYS 30 30 30 DEC. 1996 663 65.7 64.6' # DAYS 3'I 31 31 Q4 1996 ~ 6&5 64.6 # DAYS 92 92 92 JAN'. 1997 66]1 65.6 64.2 # DAYS 31 30 30 FEB. 1997 653 65.1 64.5 # DAYS 2g 28 22 ~R. 1997 66.0 65.4 63.9 # DAYS 31 31 30 Q-1 1996 66.0 6&4 64.2 # DAYS 90 ~9 ~ APR. 1997 65.6 65.6 64.0 # DAYS 28 23 29 ~Y 1997 65.8 66.0 64.: # DAYS 31 28 31 JUNE 1997 65.9 67.:2 64.6 # DAYS 3O 22 30 Q--2 1997 ~ 66.2 64.3 # DAYS 89 73 90 A'LY 1997 66.4 65.9 64.5 # DAYS 31 31 31 AUG. 1997- 66,3 65.8 6.42 #DAYS 31 30 31 SEFT. 1997 66,3 65.6 64,3 # DAYS 30 29 30 Q~ 199'7 663 65.g 643 # DAYS 92 90 92 TOTAL 66.1 65.7 64.4 # DAYS 363 344 362 Q-3 1996 TIiRU Q-2 1997 .(pr~ous 4 Quoters): TOTAL 66.0 65.7 643 DAYS 363 345 361 C~uNGE FROM PREVIOUS 4 QUARTERS: 57.7 573 59.5 29 28 . 29 57.6 55.4 583 27 25 25 56,3 5 g.O .59.4 29 27 29 55.4 5g.7 59.3 29 24 29 54.9 58~ 58.9 27' 27 27 54.8 58.1 59.0 31 31 31 g7.7. ~7.1 .~9.3 56.5 58,3 59.4 30 30 30 55.5 58.4 59.2 26 31 31 58.7 59.2 60.2 30 30 30 ~7.2 SR.7 59.6 $6 91 91 58.2 60.5 603 29 23 31 58.0 ~9.2 59.5 31 31 31 57.5 -~9.9 593 30 29 30 573 29 573 29 56.6 ".3 56.6 I1 56.1 21 57.1 30 56.7 62 61.2 563 28 56.6 3O 81 583 30 57.4 28 56.3 27 57.9 59.9 59.g' 57.4 90 83 92' 85 57.0 58.6 59.4 57.5 348 . 336 353 309 57.9 26 56.7 28 57.0 31 57.2 57.4 30 563 25 56.6 30 56.4 22 56.6 29 54.6 30 54.4 29 53.7 29 52.4 24 53.6 82 56.1 333 57.9 29 6O.5 25 55.2 27 81 55.3 20 553 26 56. g 24 70 53.5 lg 55'/- 24 50.7 27 53.4 533 29 58.6 22 56.g 26 56.5 77 56.5 297 68.1 31 67.1 30 67.0 31 67.4 68.1 22 673 2g 67.7 31 67.7 67.8 68.4 31 69.4 27 68.6 68.4 31 68.1 30 68.1' 30 68.2 91 68.0 356 56.7 57.9 59.3 58.0 56.6 56.6 68.0 340 345 347 310 341 296 356 0.1 0.0 0.I 0,3 0.7 0.1 dj dj 4.1 0.0 Q~ART~RLYREPORT l~/gg -5- TABLE 3 .. ?,.Ms ~~-:~ (,m C~L) DAILY CKEL VALUES AT E~.CH MONITOR STATION ~ULY 1997 Date 1 2 3 21 22 24 6 1 66.2 65.7 2 66.2 66.0 3 65.5 65.9 4 63.9 63.4 5 63.9 63.3 6 66.2 -65.5 7 66.8 65.2 8 65.7 66.0 9 65.2 65.8 io 65.4 65.8 11 66.3 65.7 t2 65.1 64.6 13 66.1 65.8 14 66.3 66.0 15 66.3 66.0 16 66.5 66.2 17 66.6 66.3 18 67.0 66.5 19 65.6 65.0 20 66.7 66.1 21 66.5 66.3 22 67.0 66.7 9_3 66.8 66.6 24 66.7 66.4 25 67.2 66.7 26 65.5 65.4 27 66.5 66.0 28 67.4 66.8 29 66.4 65.9 30 66.6 66.4 31 67.2 ~ 66.3 64.2 57.7 0.0 * 59.2 60.6 52.0 64.3 57.8 60.0 59.7 56.8 52.1 64.4 57.0 60.7 59.9 54.2 51.5 61.9 55.4 59.0 57.7 58.6 48.5 61.8 55.0 57.5 57.4 52.8 50.6 64.2 57.5 59.4 60.6 · 57.1 52.6 65.0 58.7 62.5 61.4 57.7 55.1 64.4 37.3 60.0 61.5 55.7 55.3 64.4 0.0 * 62.6 60.6 55.9 53.1 64.7 0.0 * 60.6 60.9 57.8 56.8 64.7 56.6 60.8 62.0 58.7 53.1 63.0 57.8 59.8 59.2 56.0 52.9 · 64.2 57.9 59.0 60.0 58.3 54.4 64.3 58.6 59.4 60.0 56.8 54.5 64.5 58.9 58.5 59.9 60.3' 52.9 64.4 57.8 60.3 6012 57.7 54.6 64.4 58.7 60.3 60.4 57.1 53.6 64.7 58.8 61.1 61.0 57.0 55.2 65.4 58.7 59.8 60.9 60.6 52.8 64.6 58.2 . 64.0 60.5 58.9 53.0 64.8 58.9 61.1 60.8 57.1 55.2 64.9 59.5 60.5 60.8 58.2 54.4 64.9 58.9 60.9 60.4 57.5 53.2 64.9 60.1 59.1 59.8 55.5 0.0 * 64.8 58.4 0.0 ~ 60.3 62.4 61.3 65.5 '59.5 0.0 * 60.4 59.1 51.7 64.0 58.0 0.0 * 59.8 57.6 53.7 65.3 58.9 0.0 * 60.7 60.1 0.0 * 64.0 59. I 0.0 * 61.1 59.9 55.4 64.6 58.8 0.0 * 60.4 0.0 * 54.3 65.1 59.0 0.0 * 60.3 59.1 52.8 55.7 0.0 * 56.1 45.9 36.2 50.2 52.4 52.8 57.0 45.6 48.6 38.5 43.9 49.5 49.2 51.0 58.5 .51.7 55.4 51.6 51.2 52.8 52.4 50.3 53.2 55.6 56.4 0.0 ' 46.3 46.9 59.3 68.4 67.8 67.9 66.3 65.9 68.7 68.8 69.0' 68.5 68.8 68.7 66.4 68.9 70.0 68.4-".':'-.;"% · ': :':-.-.:.~., 68.9 69.5 67.1 68.8 68.7 68.4 68.5 68.9 69.3 66.2 68.8 68.7 68.5 68.4 68.6 Dpts = 31 31 EnAvg= 66.4 65.9 * Ins. ufficicnt data 31 29 23 31 30 29 29 64.5 58-29 60.5 60.3 58.3 54.4 53.3. 31 RO:jw QUARTERLY~EPORT ~ ~E~ (d~ CNEL). Date 1 2 TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION AUGUST 1997 3 21 22 24 6 7 8 9 1 66.9 66.5 2 65.2 64.6 3 66.5 66.0 4 67.0 66.6 5 65.9 65.4 6 65.6 65.5 7 67.0 66.2 8 66.6 66.4 9 65.0 64.5' 10 66.4 · 65.6 11 66.9 66.2 12 66.5 65.8 13 66.0 65.7 14 65.7 0.0 15 67.3 66.8 16 65.5 65.1 17 66.6 66.3 18 66.6 65.9 · 19 65.8 64.8 · 20- 66.4 66.4 21 66.6 65.7 22 67.4 66.8 23 . 65.1 64.9 24 66.2 65.7 25 66.5 66.1 26 66.4 66.O 27 66.3 65.8 28 67.1 66.5 29 67.3 66.7 30 64.7 64.2 31 63.5 63.3 Dpts - 31 30. En.Avg- 66.3 65.8 * Insuff~fi~t data 64.6 57.8 55.2 58.8 62.6 54.4 54.9 55.6 64.3 56.8 57.7 58.9 65.0 57.3 58.2 58.7 64.2 58.0 57.3 58.8 63.8 57.2 59.6 58.9 65.1 58.1 60.4 60.0 64.7 58.2 59.5 59.7 63.0 57.5 60.3 58.4 64.4 58.2 58.4 . 59.8 65.0 58.6 59.0 60.6 64.5 59.3 58.5 60.7 63.8 57.7 60.4 59.7 * 63.4 5~.4 58.6 59.8 65.3 59.5 60.4 61.6 63.5 57.0 -59.1 58.6 65.1 58.0 58.8 60.5 64.5 57.1 59.3 58.7 63.4 56.9 59.7 58.3 64.5 60.0 60-6 60.0 64.4 57.5 59.0 58.8 65.2 57.7. 60.4 60.1 62.9 55.8 57.5 57.4 63.9 57.5 60.9 59.2 64.2 57.7 58.8 59.4 64.3 58.7 58.7 59.2 64.3 58.5 58.6 59.7 65.8 59.5 61.8 61.5 65. ! 60.5 62.0 62.0 62.2 55.2 57.5 57.6 61.4 56.5 57.2 57.8 31 31 31 31 64.2 58.0 59.2 59.5 57.9 57.0 57.5 58.3 59.5 55.6 55.9 56.3 59.5 58.5 0.0 57.7 58.5 55.6 56.5 56.4 0.0 54.2 54.1 56.2. 58.8 56.8 54.2 57.9 56.0 56.0 58.6 59.4 60. i 56.0 0.0 28 57.4 51.1 0.0 * 50.3 0.0 * 50.6 53.5 53.7 55.5 53.6 55.2 56.3 54.9 54.0 · 54.5. 58.5 53.8 52.3 57.3 5.47 52.O 52.4 51.0 49.6 52.0 53.6 51.5 52.3 52.5 53.8 5O .3 50.8 29 53.7 60.8 61.5 57.5 0.0 0.0 57.1 58.0 0.0 59.2 57.4 58.2 55.1 60.4 0.0 58.4 59.7 0.0 60.6 60.4 55.3 61.2 58.1 0.0 0.0 56.0 58.2 54.4 53.7 55.3 0.0 0.0 58.6 68.0 65.7 68.2 67.5 67.5 68.2 68.8 69.0 66.9 68.8 68.5 68.7 68.4 68.6 0.0 66.5 69.2 68.3 68.8 68.8 68.0 68.5 66.0 69.8 68.0 67.8 68.0 68.7 68.9 65.9 66.7 3O 68.1 QUAR'I'ERLYREPORT 1/26/9g -7- .. RMS NUMBER (dB C,'~EL) Dam 1 2 TABLE $ DAILY CNEL VA.Lb-ES AT EACH MONITOR STATION SEFrEMBER 1997 1 66.4 2 66.3 3 65.6 4 65.9 5 66.6 6 64.4 7 66.3 8 66.2' 9 66.5 · 10 66.7 11 67.6 12 67.0 13 6~.5 14 66.2 15 66.4 i6 66.6 17 66.7 18 66.8 19 '66.9 20 63.9 21 67.4. 22 67.2 23 65.9 24 · 66.9 25 65.5 26 66.9 27 64.1 28 66.5 29 65.8 3O 65.9 Dpts = 30 En.Avg= 663 Insufficient dam 66.0 64.7 57.5 59.6 60.0 57.4 66.0 64.5 57.4 58.8 60.3 56.3 65.3 63.7 57.9 59.8 59.3 52.7 65.6 63.7 56.6 58.9 59.6 55.9 66.3 64.7 58.5 60.3 59.7 58.2 64.1 62.6 58.4 58.2 57.1 53.9 65.9 64.7 57.4 61.00 59.6 55.9 65.6 64.1 56.8 59. I 58.5 55.2 65.8 64.1 57.7 59.7 58.8 55.8 65.9 63.9 57.3 60.3' 59.6 55.8 66.4 66.1 58.3 61.1 60.3 56.7 65.7 64.8 58.3 61.9 60.4 58.0 63.9 62.6 55.7 59.1 57.7 0.0 * 65.4 63.6 55.3 58.5 57.3 0.0 * 65.6 64.3 57.6 59.6 59.0 0.0 * 66.1 64.6 58.3 60.6 58.7 53.8 65.8 64.5 57. I 59.9 58.7 55.2 66.0 64.9 58.0 59.9 60.0 56.3' 66.3 64.6 58.2 61.7 58.9 56.3 63.3 61.7 55.1 59.5 56.6 55.5 66.5 64.9 57.3 59.9 59.0 57.9 67.0 66.0 58.0 61.2 59.4 56.7 65.5 63.2 56.7 58.8 58.1 56.8 66.1 64.9 58.2 59.3 59.8 55.4 64.7 65.3 57.6 0.0 * 62.4' 54.5 66.5 65.2 58.3 61.4 60.8 57.9 63.4 61.8 56.4 58.5 57.3 55.1 65.6 64.5 57.4 58.8 59.2 ' 57.2 61.7 64.1 57.8 59.3 59.5 58.9 . 0.0 * 64.2 58.7 59.0 59.3 55.3 51.2 52.4 50.3 0.0 53.0 50.2 52.3 50.4 52.1 52.3 0.0 ' 0.0" 0.0 * 0.0 * 54.4 52.4 54.1 52.8 49.9 51.5 50.0 51.3 49.9 55.2 54.5 50.9 · 51.0 53.6 54.8 50.3 57.9 56.8 0.0 58.0 59.5 56.9 57.9 56.7 60.1 58.3 56.0 55.2 56.2 58.8 54.0 53.0 55.1 53.2 0.0 * 56.0 54:5 55.9 58.4 58.0 55.5 0.0 * 0.0 * 56.4 54.7 67.9 68.6 67.2 68.0 69.0 66.2 67.6 67.8 67.7 67.9 69.2 69.3 65.6 68.5 ., 68.8 68.2 68.7 65.7 67.7 67.8 67.6 67.4 69.4 68.8 65.7 68.6 68.4 69.0 29 30 30 29 30 27 .24 26 30 65.6 64.3 57.5 59.9 59.3 56.3 52.4 56.8 68.1 R.G:jw QUARTERLYKEPORT 1;26/9g -8- COMMERCIAL Cla~ A TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGL~. EVk-NT NOISE EXPO~ LEVEI~ July- September 1997 Dcpam~ Noi~ Monitor St~on Carrier AC Type .Maaka B7~74 402 Amcrican B757 343 MDg0 lO$ Americ~ W~ A320 2 B7373 176 B757 gg Dclt~ B757 198 MDg0 68 F:~Ex A300 I A310 62 Notthwe~ A320 42g MDg0 523 ~ MDg0 I Soutiu~z~ B';373 TWA B'757 160 MDB0 109 ,4320 B7373 88 B757 3O UPS B757 51 USAir BT3~ 162 B7~7 I Av~.g: 95.g 95.1 Av, xage 91.9 Cou~ (3.39) 027) A~ lOI~ 101.0 Av~e ~J ~.4 ~ (~) ( Av~ ~.1 ~3.5 ~ (174) (169) A~ 9~J ~.5 A~' 94.7 ~ (~ (l~ A~ 91~ ~.7 ~ . (68) ( Av~ 953 ~.4 Av~ 98.{ 98.1 Av~ 953 ~.2 ~ (4:~) (~3) A~ ~.4 ~.0 ~ (~m) (4~ A~ gg.0 A~ 943 ~.g ~ (~) (~) Av~ ~ 9 l.g A~e ~ ~.1 A~e ~ . ~.4 Av~ ~3.7 ~3~ A~ ~.4 %.2 A~ %.g %.1 · # ~ ~ th~ uumtx~ of~'cr~ ~ olx~o~ SENEL valm= ~ ~t ou~ RG:jw QUARTERLY'REPORT 1/'2.9198 -9- R.\{S-3 K.MS-21 ~MS-22 ILMS-24 P, Mg-6 92.8 099) 90.0 038) 99.5 (104) (~) 90.7 (174) 94.0 038) 93.g ( 92.6 (196) gg.1 (1) 96.8 (6~) 92.8 (421) 96.4 (1) (lSI) (lSZ) 95.6 (105) 89.4 (79) ( 91.0 (30) 90.1 (51) 97.1 .(I~9) 97.4 (i) 8'7.0 SSA 85.0 g4.8 076) 0'~') (~Ol) 070) 84.1 ' 85.1 86.0 ~.4 (288) (278) ~ 9~1 94~ ~.g (m) (~) 0o~) (9~ (:) (~) ( (~6~) 0~o) 07~) (~ ~.6 ~.5 ~.g ~n) ~o~) ~4~) ~3) (~) (7~) (~) (~) ~.6 g.50 gig ~.0 (~ 069) (m~ 060 7~.7 81.0 ~.1 ~ ~o) (~9) ( ~3 89.1 ~.4 ~.9 (~) (~) ( ~.4 5Lo ~.4 (~) ( ~ (~:) (~1) gs.o ~.: ~.5 ~.4 (4~) (~ (sn) (4~) ~.0 81.0 80.2 76. g ( 0 (~) ( 07o) (z~9) (z~o) U6o) 8~.7 ~8.2 913 ~.6 · 003) ( ~ (~ (~) (~) ( e~ (~) ( ~5.4 ~.6 (~z) (~) (s~) (~o) (3o) (25) ( ~:8 853 ~3 ~.4 (~ (~9) (49) (4~) ~.2 ~.9 91.5 ~.7 gg.g ~.1 92.1 gg3 (~) (~) ( TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SLNGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS July- September 1997 .COM~[ERCLAT, __ AmeHcaa B757 759 B757 128 B757 91 MI)90 269 B7373 179 "%320 248 B757 256 cOM3fERCIAT. -- Class E AC Tyg~ #D~' Noise Monitor Station dB SENEL ~1 P, MS-2 R.MS-3 P,-MS-21 RMS-22 P, MS-24 P,_MS-6 Average 933 93.0 89.6 84. g 84.5 85.8 8'2.6 Count . (208) (199) (206) (195) (181) (208) (lgg) Aver'ag~ 90.g 90.9 89-3 83.5 84.5 85.4 g'23 co~m (750) C714) C749) (64,-3 (631) C741) Ay=ag,: 9~_7 9',.a' ~.g . ~3.8' ~43 85.9 Count (819) (787) (813) '(768) (724) (814) Awrag~ . 92.6 93.3 89.5 83.2 84.1 g3.9 813 c.o~t 027) 023) 026) (80) (7.-) (1:5) (46) Average 913 91.6 88.7 82.~ 8'3.6 83.1 80.5 count ( 90 (88) (~) (~) (,-7) (88) ( Average 89.7 893 87.0 81.6 80.3 82.7 Coum (264) (2§9) (263) (18I) (194) (262) (1§2) Average 87.4 87.4 gig 78.3 80.2 80.9 78.7 Cou~t (89) (85) (89) (68) (73) (87) (32) Avn-a~ 93.4 93.2 89.7 g3.g 84.7 853 82.1 c.o~a 0,-7) (i75) 077) 066) 056) 070 058) Average 913 90.9 8<3.4 8'3.1 8 $.0 85.4 8'3.1 C. oum (247) (236) (:46) (:10) (197) (2n,D (:25) Average 923 92..4 90.5 83.5 85.1 85.7 .82.5 Coum C2n) (:47) (25:) (:3 ~) (2 m) (:54) (230) Departure Noise Monitor Station clB SENEL ]LM$.- 1 lLM..%2 R,V,S.3 1LM g.: 1 1LMS-22 1LV, S-24 Alaska B7374 299 Average 91.0 91.1 88.2 84.2 84.0 84.g gl.4 co~ (29{0 (28~) (298) (285) (269) (297) (262) America W=t B7373 765 Average 91.7 91.5 88.8 83.5 84.4 85.2 81.7 Count (759) (744) (760) (704) (654) (760) (650) D~lta MDg0 114 Av~ag¢ 90.3 ~.6 87.4 79.6 83.0 '83.0 Co~ (113) (109) (113) (78) 000) On) (?6) Retm MDg0 . 636 Average 88.7 88_3 86.6 - '79.1 80.8 81.7 79.4 Count' (630) (615) (631) (479) (536) (620) (212) Southwest B7373 878 Average 92.2 923, 88.7 833 84.5 84.6 81.g · . C. oant (ri2) (a36) (g69) (823). (78~) (~7D (7~6) Unit~ B757 687 Aver-age 90.8 90.6 88_3 81.7 g'2.8 83.9 81.4 Co~t (6g0) (6~5) (6g4) (6~7). (589) (680 (560 * # Deps equals the number of aircr~ departure operation SENEL values measured at one or more departure noise monitor stations. Not every depax~e is measured at every monitor. RG:jw QUAP, TERLYREPORT -10- 1/26/98 TABLE 8 MEASLrI~D AVERAGE SllqGLg. EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS J'ulv - September 1997 CO~R Cl~ss E Departure Noise Monitor Station ~ SEN~- Carder AC %]z # Deps* 1LMS-1 RMS-2 1LMS-3 1LMS-6 Skywest CL60 '166 Average 84.9 83.4 86.1 88.6 (Delta Connect.) Count (165) (157) (164) (5) El20 1 Average ..... Count (). ( ) ( ) ( ) West Air BA31 581 Average 83.4 81.2 82.0' 88.4 (Un/ted Express) Count (249) (141) (117) (16) W'mgs West SF34 288 (American Eagle) Average 80.8 83.2 83.1 79.9 Count (250) (233) (235) (5) GE,¥ERA.L AVIATION Dep~ Noise Monitor Staxion dB_ SEN~. #Deps* i~MS-1 RMS-2 RMS-3 RMS-6 ? Private Sets 1531 Average 90.0 89.2 90.9 85.8 Cotmt (1490) (1399) (1427) (489) . . * # De'ps equals the number of aircraft depara=e operation SENEL values measured at one or more departure noise monitor stations. Not every departure is measured at every monitor. RG:jw QUARTERLYR.EPORT ~n~/~ - 11- © NAC ROSTER September 25, 1997 ~q'a.lTle Doris Mays Bonnie Str~ter JoM Escodebo Yohn Leyerle Man. in Sotruh Cra.il Re. avis Rita Jones Cart Braatz Jim Brush Mark Esslinger Address TWA TWA TWA JWA 20332 Riverside Dr. 21281 Astoria 20401 Cypress TWA Tustin Planning & Develop. Svcs. Phone Number 252-5185 252-5185 252-5185 252-5043 546-64-~8 461-0020 756-9126 2524033 544-2781 . 834-5049 RgdocffMinl NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: October 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of AeronautiCs Noise Standards Submitted by: Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County BRISTOL STREET SOUTH RMS 1 I I1 ~NE IIIIIII ~ 1111 // -- LEGEND Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential (Number indicates dwellini units) IncompaEble Land Use Area: 26~9 acres or 0.043 square miles Number of Dwellings: 118 of People: 296 (Based on 2.5 people per D. U.) JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 6~ dB CNEL IMPACT AREA JANUARY 1997 - DECEMBER 1997 j 0 I-LN' WAYNE AIRPORT AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY · Th~ Akport traffic summary, for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 2 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 10. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS October- December 1997 Jet Propeller Business (1) -Total (2) Average Daily Month/Quarter Air Carriers Air Carriers Jet Aircraft Operations Jet Operations October 6,144 858 1,166 3 7,955 236 November 6,164 818 998 55,877 23 9 December 4.066 472 708 32,253 154 Fourth Quarter 16,374 2,148 2,872 106,085 209 PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS: 75,884 17,687 11,379 447,415 239 01/01/97 - 12/31/97 NOTE: (1) Business Jet fi.~mrres include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based' upon. records provided by the local FAA representatives. Figure 2 Quarterly Airport Traffic Summary (Landing and Takeoff Operations) Military 28 Business Jet 1 2,872 Prop Carrier ! 2,148 Jet Cartier 1 16,374 GA Propeller ~ 84,663 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,00C DM:jw QUARTER 1997 3t3 -3- COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Communi .ty Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for eaCh monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "0.0" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and Business Jet aircra_~ are shown in Tables 6 throu~ 8. · · For the twelve month period ending December 31, 1997, 118 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the ',Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); there was no increase in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous v, velve month period ending September 30, 1997. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive p.roperty in the ~Noise Impact Area': homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the Coun .ty, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Aha Heights Land Use Compafibili .ty Program, approximately 77 gene~'al a~culture (A-l) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property, was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences were purchased or otherwise made compatible through the Coun .ty's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a ~ant to fund a voluntary, acoustical insulation program ritled "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" ("SAH ALP"). During the fourth quarter of 1997, no additional residences have been made compatible through the Coun~"s SAH AIP. A total of 204 residences in Santa Ana HeiSts have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the Coun'.ty's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AlP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October- December 1997) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Office received a total of 337 complaints from local citizens, a 418% decrease from the 1,410 complaints received during the previous quarter and an increase of 76% from the 256 complaints received during the same quarter of 1996. Figure 3 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. Figure 3 Quarterly Telephone Call and Complaint Summary Other Areas ~ 46 Costa Mesa. ~ 25 S.A. Heights Ia 6 SantaAna [] 10 Tusfin/Orange ~ 29 WeStciiff ~ 43 Eastbluff 1 13 Balboa/Corona Del Mar ~ 165 0 50 100 150 ,, 200 DM:jw QUARTER 1997 3/31/98 TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL f~om 1/97 throuRh 12/97 P.MS NUMBER (dB CNEL) .. 1 2 3 21 22 24 6 7 g JAax;. 1997 66.1 65.6 64.2 # DAYS . 31 30 30 FEB. 1997 65.9 65.1 64.5 # DAYS 2g 28 2g MAR. 1997 66.0 65.4 63.9 # DAYS 31 31 30 Q-I 1996 66~0 65.4 64.2 # DAYS 90 89 88 APR. 1997 65.6 65.6 64.0 # DAYS 28 23 29 MAY 1997 65.8 66.0 64.2 # DAYS 31 28 31 JUNE 1997 65.9 67.2 ~4.6 # DAYS 3O 22 30 Q-2 1997 65.8 66.2 64.3 # DAYS 89 75 90 JULY 1997 66.4 65.9 64.5 # DAYS 31 31 31 AUG. 1997 66.3 65.8 6.42 # DAYS 31 3O 31 SEPT. 1997 66.3 65.6 64.3 # DAYS 3O 29 3O Q-3 1997 66~ 65.8 64.3 # DAYS 92 90 92 OCT. 1997 65.9 65.2 64.2 # DAYS 31 30 3O NOV. 1997 66.4 65.9 64.3 # DAYS 30 30 30 DEC. 1997 65.2 64.9 653 # DAYS 31 2O 30 Q-4 1997 6&9 65.4 64.6 # DAYS 92 80 90 Q.1 1997 THRU Q-4 1997: TOTAL 66.0 65.7 64.4 # DAYS 363 332 360 Q-4 1996 THRU Q-3 1997 CPr~vious 4 Quarters): TOTAL , 66.1 65.7 64.4 # DAYS 363 344 362 CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS 4 QUARTERS: -0.1 0.0 0.0 55.4 29 54.9 27 54.g 31 S7.2 56.5 30 55.5 26 58.7 30 58.2 58.0 31 57.5 30 57.9 5g.o 27 58.1 27 57.6 27 $7.9 $1 57.8 184 57.0 348 0.8 58.7 ~4 58.2 :27 58.1 31 57.1 583 30 58.4 31 59.2 30 58.7 91 59.2 31 59.9 29 $9.9 59.1 26 59.3 25 58.9 21 $9.1 72 60.0 I68 58.6 336 1.4 59.3 29 58.9 27 59.0 31 59.3 59.4 30 59.2 31 60.2 30 59.6 91 6O.3 31 59.5 31 59.3 3O 59.8 92 58.6 11 59.9 27 60.0 20 59.7 59.7 163 59.4 353 0.3 56.6 11 56.1 21 57.1 30 56.7 62 61.2 23 56.9 28 56.6 3O 81 3O 57.4 28 56.3 27 $7.4 56.5 31 56.8 27 55.1 29 57.3 315 57.5 3O9 -0.2 57.4 30 563 25 56.6 30' 56.4 22 56.6 29 54.6 30 81 54.4 ' 29 53.7 29 52.4 24 53.6 57.0 29 56.0 29 56.0 25 56.4 55.9 331 56.1 333 -0.2 55.3 20 553 26 56.8 24 55.9 70 53.5 lg 55.2 24 50.7 27 53.4 69 533 29 58.6 22 56.8 26 77 53.9 31 52.4 30 53.0 29 54.9 3O6 56.5 297 -1.6 68.1 28 67.3 28 67.7 31 67.7 67.8 28 68.4 31 69.4 27 68.1 3O 68.1 3O 91 67.0 31 66.0 28 63.9 26 65.9 67.7 349 68.0 356 .. · , · . DM:jw 4' QUARTER 1997 3;31/98 -5- RMS NUMBER (dB CNEL) Date 1 ' 2 TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL'VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION OCTOBER 1997 3 21 22 24 6 7 8 9 1 66.3 2 66.2 3 67.5 4 64.2 5 66.4 6 65.6 7 65.4 8 67.1 9 '66.9 10 66.7 11 61.6 12 65.4 13 61.4 14 64.8 15 65.8 16 65.4 17 67.2 18 64.1 19 65.9 20 66.2 21 66.6 22 66.6 23 66.9 24 67.7 25 58.1 26 65.7 27 66.0 28 66.3 29 66.3 30 66.7 31 65.8 0.0 * 64.5 62.5 64.4 66.7 65.3 63.9 61.9 65.9 64.0 65.2 63.6 65.3 63.7 66.6 64.6 64.9 64.9 66.6 64.7 61.7 64.0 64.5 63.6 60.1 0.0 * 64.2 63.5 65.2 64.1 64.7 63.3 66.4 65.1 63.6 61.2 . 65.1 63.8 65.3 64.6 65.9 64.5 65.8 64.7 66.4 65.2 67.2 65.5 58.4 64.6 64.7 63.0 65.9 64.2 65.8 64.5 65.6 64.4 65.8 64.8 65.6 63.5 58.6 59.1 58.7 54.3 55.6 56.2 68.8 57.7 60.4 59.5 55.6 56.0 50.9 69.2 58.7 60.7 61.0 57.8 57.9 54.5 68.8 55.7 57.2 57.0 '' 55.6 56.0 52.6 65.9 57.'8 58.2 58.8 57.8 58.7 40.7 68.6 57.9 .59.3 58.8 56.0 58.4 53.9 68.0 58.9 58.2 52.5 56.5 58.3 47.5 67.8 58.3 59.9 0.0 * 57.1 58.4 48.8 67.7 58.3 59.3 0.0 * 56.2 56.7 52.2 68.4 59.2 60.9 0.0 * 57.3 59.6 43.9 69.7 · 59.5 56.0 0.0 * 53.0. 53.7 48.2 62.8 55.9 58.3 0.0 * 54.3 53.2 48.5 65.8 51.6 53.6 0.0 * 48.5 0.0 * 45.2 62.4 57.3 57.2 0.0 * 53.3 0.0 * 54.1 65.7 55.9 58.0 0.0 * 52.9 56.5 57.1 65.3 56.8 58.2 0.0 * 56.1 54.3 51.6 63.5 58.4 60.3 O.0 * 55.3 55.4 56.9 66.3 56.3 58.0 0.0 * 57.3 54.2 52.9 64.8 58.7 0.0 * 0.0 * 57.0 58.4 53.0 68.5 59.3 60.7 0.0 * 57.4 57.6 53.6 68.0 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 * 59.1 57.9 53.5 67.7 59.5 60.7 57.6 57.4 59.3 54.7 68.2 0.0 *. 0.0 * 0.0 * 60.1 59.0 54.3 68.9 0.0 * 60.8 0.0 * 59.8 57.2 54.7 67.0 53.7 57.4 0.0 * 55.9 54.4 57.6' 59.6 57.8 57.0 0.0 * 57.6 53.1 55.6 65.9 59.2 58.7 0.0 * 57.4 56.1 52.8 67.7 0.0 * 60.2 0.0 * 55.3 57.5 57.5 66.7 58.9 0.0 * 57.8 55.5 55.4 56.2 68.1 58.7 0.0 * 59.5 55.3 57.0 54.7 58.9 58.2 59.6 59.3 54.8 56.9 55.0 62.2 -.. Dpts = 31 .~::'-..i-. i-. En.Avg= 65.9 Insu~cient data DM:jw QUARTER 1997 3/31/9g 30 30' 659.2 6~.2 27 26 11 31 29 31 31 58.0 59.1 58.6 56.5 57.0 53.9 67.0 -6- RM$ NLrMBER (dB CNEL) Date. 1 2 TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL' VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION NOVEMBER 1997 3 21 22 24 6 7 8 9 1 64.0 62.5 2 65.8 65.3 3 66.0 65.0 4 65.1 64.8 5 66.2 65.6 6 66.2 65.7 7 66.2 65.4 8 61.7 61.4 9 66.6 65.9 10 66.7 66.2 11 66.8 66.0 12 66.8 66.5 13 66.4 66.2 14 66.9 66.6 15 65.3 65.0 16 67.4 .66.7 17 66.7 66.1 18 66.7 65.8 19 67.5 67.0 · 20 67.3 66.8 21 68.2 67.3 22 63.8 63.5 23 ' 66.6 66.3 24 66.8 66.3 25 67.5 67.1 26 68.4 68.1 27 63.2 62.9 28 65.4 65.3 29 65.6 65.1 30 68.3 67.4 61.4 54.8 58.2 57.3 53.4 63.3 56.6 59.5 59.7 56.7 64.1 57.1 ' 58.3 58.3 55.1 63.0 59.0 59.7 58.5 54.0 64.1 58.0 59.8 59.4 55.9 64.5 58.1 59.6 59.6 :57.5 64.0 58.3 0.0 * 60.4 57.0. 60.9 55.3 56.4 57.0 54.2 64.7 58.2 59.4 62.9 0.0 64.8 59.6 0.0 * 60.4 57.8 64.3 58.1 '0.0 * 60.0 56.7 65.1 58.4 60.1 60.4 56.2 66.1 0.0 * 60.9 0.0 * 56.2 65.0 59.8 59.4 60.3 '56.2 63.0 57.0 58.4 58.7 55.7 65.0 58.7 59.0 0.0 * 57.8 64.8 59.0 0.0 * 60.8 58.6 64.3 · 58.2 59.4 60.0 58.5 65.0 59.0 60.2 59.9 57.9 65.2 59.0 59.5 61.3 57.6 65.7 0.0 * 60.3 60.8 57.9 61.3 .55.1 59.4 56.3 54.3 64.4 57.6 58.5 61.4 55.8 64.5 58.2 59.7 59.6 57.3 65.7 59.6 60.2 61.0 57.5 66.4 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 61.0 55.2 58.0 57.2 51.3 63.1 57.5 58.2 59.1 57.5 63.0 56.9 58.7 59.1 0.0 65.7. 59.3 60.4 61.4 59.2 49.5 51.9 54.9 56.9 58.8 58.0 56.8 55.9 57.0 57.2 54.8 56.3 56.8 56.3 54.0 55.5 55.7 55.9 57.9 55.9 54.5' s .O 54.4 56.4 57.9 0.0 52.3 55.5 56.8 57.3 57.0 56.4 55.6 51.8 55.3 57.2 52.4 52.6 54.6 43.4 46.1 51.4 49.0 52.8 45.6 44.3 50.2 55.1 49.9 50.7 51.1 51.5 50.9 51.1 51.8 52.8 49.7 48.5 44.2 48.1 46.3 58.5 49.2 67.3 68.4 68.8 68.8 65.8 67.5 68.1 67.9 60.5 68.2 67.5 ss. 67.1 66.9 59.4 65.9 67.5 57.7 0.0 0.0 66.7 69.2 68.9 64.3 61.4 54.2 54.2 Dpts = 30 30 En.Avg= 66.4 65.9 * Insufficient data DM:jw QUARTER 1997 3/31/98 30 27 25 27 27 29 30 643 58.1 59.3 59.9 56.8 56.0 52.4 -7- 28 o. ~s Nurivm~ (~ CNEL) D~te 1 2 TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL.VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION DECEMBER 1997 1 67.2 66.8 2 66.8 66.2 3 67.0 66.4 4 66.7 65.6 5 65.6 64.3 6 64.4 64.9 7 67,3 67,0 8 65,8 66,0 9 60,7 60,5 10 60,8 58,9 i1 63.4 59,9 12 63,7 64,1 13 62,7 62,5 14 66,1 65,5 15 66.2 65.3 16 65.9 65.2 17 66,8 65,7 18 66,6 62,0 19 65,5 0,0 20 64,4 0,0 21 66,0 0,0 22 · 63,9 0,0 23 67,1 0,0 24 61,0 0,0 25 57,2 0,0 26 61,2 0,0 27 63,6 0,0 28 63.1 0.0 29 66,5 65,4 30 66,6 66,2 31 65,1 0,0 65,3 64,9 64,9 65,1 65,9 67,7 65,9 65,1 65,6 67,4 67,7 63,6 60,7 64,1 64,6 64,0 64,5 0,0 * 68,2 61,8 64,2 64.6 64,8 66,4- 66,0 63,1 59,9 67,9 64,6 64,9 63,2 59,1 0,0 * 60,6 59,0 60,0 60,9 58,3 59,9 61,4 59,2 59,7 61,4 57.0 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 * 59,9 59,7 61,0 0,0 * 0,0 * 61,5 51,5 0,0 * 0,0 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 * 0.0 * 0.0 54,7 58,0 59.5 55,3 0,0 * 56,1 58,1 57,7 59.2. 58,8 59,3 60,4 57,7 58,8 59,4 58,3 59,7 60,6 58,4 59,4 0,0 58,0 59,1 0,0 57,4 '0,0 * 57,8 59,0 56,9 60,3 58.6 58,4 0,0 58,9 60,6 6O,7 53,2 58,5 0,0 56,6 0,0 * 0,0 52,6 57,6 59,8 53,2 53,1 54,4 57,1 57,1 0,0 58,5 60.0 59,8 59,0 59,0 60,3 56,6 59,3 59,4 56,7 56,7 56,7 56,5 53,6 0,0 .. 56,5 55,5 43,3 53,2 0,0 49,6 48,8 54,7 56,0 54.5 55,9 54.8 57,5 54,1 55,1 56,7 57.3 51,2 50,3 46,6 49,6 53,6 54,4 56,3 59,4 57,1 58,6 57,1 54,7 57,0 0.0 58,7 58,4 52,9 0.0 0.0 54,6 49,6 54,9 56,1 55,5 57,2 57,5 0.0 54.6 55.0 58,2 57,8 51,5 0,0 49,8 48,2 0,0 54,7 57,1 54,3 50,6 51,8 52,7 52,7 49,2 57.8 46.0 44,7 48.2 51.3 0.0 * 56,9 54,5 47.5 52,4 56,5 52.4 53,7 '52,4 53,3 51.8 56,8 0.0 * 52,O 52,3 55.7 55.2 45,7 49,1 51,4 48,3 56,0 64,3 68,0 67,7 63,6 65,9 69,4 64,0 65,1 61,0 65,5 61,6 52,1 0.0 0.0 0.0 58,0 57,4 55.1 62.3 66.2 62.8 64.9 57,2 48,8 55.1 59,5 0,0 0.0 66.4 65.1 Dpts = 31 20 En.Avg= 65.2 64.9 * Insuf~ci~t data 30 27 21 20 29 65.3 57.6 58.9 60.0 55.1 25 56.0 29 53.0 26 63.9 DM:jw 4" QUARTER 1997 3/31/98 -8- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXI~S~ LEVELS October- December 1997 COMMERCIAL Departur~ Noise Monitor Station dB SENEL Class A Carri~ AC Type # Deps* ILMS.-I RMS-2 RMV-3 RMS-21 RMS-22 ILMS-24 ILMS-6 Alaska B7374 281 American B757 282 Average 94.9 92.7 87.2 86.0 87.9 Count (242) (279) (273) (255) (205) Average 91.0 89.4 '84.3 84.6 85.6 Count (242) (279) (255) .(240) (203) ME) gO 77 Average 100.0 98.9 92. I 91.7 93.7 Count (65) (76) (71) (71) (60) America W~st B7373 152 Aw-rage 92.9 90.2 84.6 85.3 g6.g Count (132) (150) (144) (140) , (I I I) B757 1 Average 95.9 93.2 85.3 0.0 84.6 Count (I) (1) (I) ( ) (1) Continental B7373 261 Average 94.3 94.0 87.2 87.8 87.8 Count (226). (259) (252) (243) (190) B757 72 Average 95.7 92.9 Count (57) (70). 87.0 - 87.3 gg.0 (69) (69) (55) De. lra B757 21 g Average 93.0 91.0 84.4 84.6 85. I Count (190) (215) (207) (194) (155) F~IEx A300 2 Average 93.5 91.4 86.2 87.9 87.5 Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) A310 50 Average 98.1 96.8 90.7 . 91.1 92.0 Count (46) (50) (49) (43) (36) Northwest A320 335 . Aw-rage 94.0 92.5 85.5 87.2 86.9 Count (296) (333) (319) 004) (246) Ra~o MDg0 452 Average 97.3 96.5 Count (400) (451) 90.6 90.6 92.2 (434) (406) . (331) $otnhwest B ~'373 147 Average 94.1 91.0 85.2 gs.g 86.2 Count (129) (145) (139) (128) (106) TWA B757 116 Average 90.8 gg.4 82.3 83.3 g3.g Count (99) (I 15) (110) (101) (82) MDg0 '103 Average 97.4 95.7 89.3 8'7.9 91.7 Count (90) (102) (101) (94) . (81) .4320 65 Average 92.2 90.6 84.2 85.5 86.9 Count (58) (65) (61) (59) (44) B7373 78 Awrage 94.3 92.3 86.7 86.8 · 87.4 Count (71) (78) (70) (71) (57) 95.8 (278) 91.0 (277) 100.4 (76) 93.3 (149) 94.9 (1) 95.4 (259) 96.0 (70) 93.5 (215) 93.3 (2) 98.8 (50) 95.0 (330) 97.6 (448) 94.4 (145) 91.7 (112) 97.7 (102) 92.8 (64) 95.1 (77) 92.6 (52) 97.4 (130) UPS B757 52 Average 92.g 89.7 84.2 84.7 85.9 Count (49) (51) (38) (32) (37) USAir B7373 135 Average 96.0 97.0 90.2 90.0 91.6 Count (11 I) (132) (130). (123) (102) 843 (267) 83.1 (2~5) 90.4 (72) 82.6 038) 0.0 () 84.1 (245) 84.2 (67) 82.2 (178) 82.8 (2) 88.2 (48) 82.3 (306) 88.9 (430) 82.1 (140) 79~9 (98) 83.5' (63) 83.9 (71) gl.4 (45) 89.4 (12g) # Deps equals the number ofaircr~ departure operation SENEL ~ues measured at one or more cleparmre noise monitor stations. Not every departure is measured al every monitor. DM:jw 4' QUARTER 1997 3.31/98 -9- TABLE 7 MEAS~D AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOS~ LEVELS October - December 1997 COMMERCL~,L Departure Noise Monitor Station dB SENEL Class AA Carri~ AC Type # Dep~* RMS-1 RMS-2 I~MS-3 RMS-21 ILMS-22 RMS--24 RMS-6 Alaska B7374 144 85.8 85.1 86.5 (135) (127) (104) Sottthwe~ Uni~d Average 93.7 93.3 90.0 82.5 Count (141) (134) (143) (136) B757 626 Aver'age 90.7 90.5 89.2 84.0 84.5 85.4 82.5 Count (60~). (~ 22) (62 i) (~ 6 I) (~ 3 ~ ) (46o) (493) : B7373 734 Awxag~ 93.0 92.5 90.0 84.7 85_3 86_3 82.3 Count (722) (638) ' (726) (705) (650) (535) (674) B757 63 ' Average 91.4 91.9 88.5 82.8 83.3 83.8 80.7 Count (63) (57) (63) (44) (29) (43) (19) B757 89 Average 91.5 91.5 89.0 83.9 .84.2 83.8 79.9 Count (78) (72) (89) (82) (77) (88) (52) ~ 215 Avera~ ~0.4. 89.8 r7.8 81.4 81.~ 84.1 81.1 Count (212) (lg8) (211) (147) (IT3) (159) (109) MDg0 72 Average 87.8 87.4 86.8 80.4 81.3 83.6 80.3 Count (71) (62) (72) (61) (56) (50) (25) 137373 152 Aver~g~ 93.7 93.5 90.0 84.7 85.2 85.9 81.6 Count (151) (135) (149) (146) (143) (10'7') (140) A320 151 Average .91.4 91.2 89.7 84.2 85.0 86.2 8322 Count 050) 033) (149) 037) 023) 010) 039) B757 221 Ava-age 92.0 91.5 89.4 83.3 83.2 84.8 82.6 Count (216) (192) (218) (210) (206) (163) (194) COMMERCIAL Departure Noise Monitor Station dB SENEL Class E Carri~ AC Type # Del~* RMS-I RMS-2 ILMS-3 RMS-21 ILMS-22 RMS-24 RMS-6 Alaska B7374 404 85.0 (295) Average 90.8 91.0 88.3 84.7 84.1 Count 098) 051) 099) 086) 064) America W~t B7373 416 Average 91.{ 91.6 88.7 84.2 84.6 Count {410) (376) (413) 092) O78) Della MD90 150 Ava-age 90. I 89.6 87.8 82.3 80.9 Count (149) (128) 047) (109) (123) R~no MDg0 502 Average 88.9 88.5 87.4 - 81.1 81.g Count (494) (442) (495) (428) (428) Soulhweax B7373 872 Avenge 92.2 92.2 88.7 83.8 84.8 Count (872) (836) (869) (823) (781) United B757 641 Average 90.4 90.3 87.7 82.2 82.6 Count (630) (556) (635) (597) (562) 81.2 (37:) 85.5 82.0 (3OO) (36O) 83_3 81.1 (109) (75) 8322 80.9 057) 84.8 80.9 (871) (716) 83.7 81_3 (463) # Deps equals the number of aircraft departure oPeration SEN'EL values measured at one or more departure noise monitor stations. Not every departure is measured at every monitor. DM:jw 4' Qu~ ~97 - 10- 3/31/98 TABLE g MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS October - December 1997 COMMUTER Class E Departure Noise Monitor Station dB SEN~. Carrier AC T)l~e # Deps* RMS-I RMS-2 RMS-3 RMS-21 RMS-22 RMS-24 R.MS-6 SkTwest (I~lta ConnecL) West Air' (Unitext Express) CL60 71 Average 85.5 84.0 86.4 77.7 79.4 81.1 80.7 Count (68) (58) (70) (32) (50) (52) (2) E 120 378 Average. 80.4 82.5 81.3 77.5 78.3 77.5 88.8 Count (355) (269) (213) (265) (54) (178) (6) BA31 474 Average 82.9 823 822 77.5 79.2 78. I 80.5 Count (331) (168) (147) (62) (194) (249) (4) E 120 151 Average 80.3 81.9 8 I. 1 77. I 77.9 ~ 77.2 83.2 Count (145) (I32) (123) (109) (25) (67) (1) .: · GENERAL AVIATION Class E Departure Noise Monitor Station dB SEN~_. Cra'tier # Dc-ps* RMS-I RM$-2 RMS-3 RMS-21 RMS-22 RMS-24 RMS4 Private Sets 1367 Average 90.5 89.7 '90.9 84.4 84.8 86.5 86.7 Count (1337)' (1168) (1289) (905) (954) (853) (456) * # Deps equals the number of aLrcraft departure operation SENEL values measured at one or more departure noise monitor stations. Not every departure is measured at every monitor. DM:jw QUARTER 1997 ~a v~ - 11- NOISE ABATEMENT COI~~EE MEETING DATE: December 11, 1997 TIME: 2:00 p.m. PLACE: Terminal Conference Room #1' AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Movin~ Plans for the ~VA Administration Offices John Leyerle, Manager, Access and Noise stated that the Administrative Offices of John Wayne Airport would be moving to 3160 Airway on January 9 and 10, 1997. 2. Airport Statistics for Calendar Year 1997 Bonnie Streeter gave an update of the Airport Stats regarding passengers, cargo and tower operations as published in the Monthly News Release. General aviation operations accounted for 79% of all operations at John Wayne Airport. 3. Planning for the 1997-98 Plan Year Capaci _ty Allocations 'John Escobedo explained that the Airport is in the midst of planning for the next Plan Year (April 1, 1998 to March 31, 1999). Allocation requests were sent out to the Carriers and received back by November 20, 1997. We are now in the process of preparing the dra~ allocation recommendations to the Airport Director. The Airport Commission will meet the first week of February to consider the Director's recommendations. After the Board of Supervisors consider and approve the allocations in early February 1998, we plan to send the final allocation letters to the Carriers in mid-February 1998. . Replacement Monitoring System Progress and Up-coming Milestones John Leyede gave a brief history ofthe current Noise Monitoring System in use at John Wayne Airport since 1979. We are currently conducting a side-by-side test of noise levels from the existing system and our new Noise Monitoring'System. The side-by-side test will continue for a one-year period. We expect to complete acceptance of the new Monitoring System in the Fall of 1998. . DM:jw 4* QUARTER 1997 3/31/98 -14- o Status of the Santa Ana Heights'Acoustical Insulation Program Carl Braatz gave an update on the Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program. He stated that 32 units were completed in April 1997. They are working on ten single family units at the present time. They have a second group of ten single family units ready to start. Any Additional Questions A resident from the Foothill Community Association asked a question about Stage 3 Aircraft. John stated that because of the 1990 Airport NOise and Capacity Act requirements mandated by Congress, by the year 2000 all Commercial Aircraft in the United States must be Stage 3. All commercial aircraft that operate at John Wayne Airport have been Stage 3 since 1985. 7. Tentative Date for Next Meeting The next meeting date was tentatively set for February 26, 1998 at 2:00 p.m. in the Terminal Conference Room #1. Announcements will be sent prior to the final date of our next meeting. DM:jw 4' QUARTER 1~97 3/3 I~ -15- NAC ROSTER December 11, 1997 NAM-E ADDRESS PHONE NO. Doris Mays Bonnie Streeter John Escobedo John Leyerle Joy Johnson JeffThorstenson Ted Nichols JWA, Noise Abatement JWA, Noise Abatement JWA, Noise Abatement JWA, Noise Abatement John Wayne ATCT John Wayne ATCT Riverside Dr. Kennel Owners 252-5185 252-5185 252-5185 252-5043 668-0141 668-0141 641-3193 Carl Braatz Charlie Barnes Sara Gerrick John Wayne A/rport UAL (SNA) FCA 8524033 252-5700 730-0510 Toni M. Callaway Fred Pefia FCA Alaska Airlines 731-1803 252-6203 Roland Ruegg Kathy Lieffeis Delta 1940 E. Edinger, S.A. 252-5911 258-2500 QUARTER 1997 3Fjl/98