Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 APPOINTMENT OF THE CITY TREASURERAgenda Item AGENDA REPORT Reviewed: a�s�t MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2013 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL FROM: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER G SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S APPOINTMENT AS THE CITY TREASURER SUMMARY: City Council is asked to consider the recommendation to appoint the Finance Director as the City Treasurer. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt one of the following three alternatives: 1. Accept the City Manager's recommendation to appoint the Finance Director as the City Treasurer, who shall be responsible for investing City funds in accordance with the City's Investment Policy that is adopted by the City Council annually, and increase the Finance Director's annual salary by 5% from $165,651 to $173,933. 2. Recruit for an appointed City Treasurer at no cost or at a cost to be determined. 3. Retain the services of an outside investment firm to invest the City's cash. FISCAL IMPACT: Appointing the Finance Director as the City Treasurer would yield a net savings in expenditures to both the General Fund and Water Enterprise Fund of $19,858. The costs associated with alternatives two (2) and three (3) are not known as this time. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation correlates to the City's strategic plan for fiscal stewardship for practicing sound stewardship of the public's assets, Goal C. BACKGROUND: Currently the Finance Director is serving as the Interim City Treasurer. As the Interim City Treasurer the Finance Director invests the City's cash according to the City's annually adopted Investment Policy. The Investment Policy is based on State law and RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S APPOINTMENT AS THE CITY TREASURER OCTOBER 1, 2013 PAGE 2 expanded to accommodate the City's investment needs. The Finance Director is investing funds based on a conservative approach that the former City Treasurer, George Jeffries followed. Mr. Jeffries made all the investments for the City based on his knowledge, research, and expertise. His annual compensation was $48,000. At no time did he make investments because he was directed to by the Finance Director or Audit Commission. He would communicate with the Finance Director on a regular basis in regards to the cash flow needs of the City and consulted with the Finance Director on many occasions regarding the investments he made or was thinking of making. Mr. Jeffries also communicated to the Audit Commission on the investments he intended to acquire and the status of interest rates. The City Manager recommends the Finance Director serve as the City Treasurer and be responsible for investing the City's cash according to the City's Investment Policy. To provide a third parry review of the City's investments the Finance Director /City Treasurer will present to the Audit Commission (Commission) the current investment portfolio and his /her strategy for investing City cash at their bi- monthly meetings. The Commission is only an advisory board; the Chair was comfortable with providing comments and recommendations regarding the investment activity but did not think it was appropriate for the Commission to provide a signature on the quarterly investment reports. The Finance Director /City Treasurer will communicate on the quarterly investment reports to the City Council the comments and recommendations the Commission may have had on the investment portfolio and investment strategy. The recommended compensation increase for the Finance Director /City Treasurer position to accommodate the additional duties as the City Treasurer is 5 %. The annual compensation would increase from $165,651 to $173,933 which is comparable to cities where the Finance Director also serves as the City Treasurer. Two alternatives to the recommendation are: ( #2) the City Council appoints a City Treasurer at no cost or at a cost to be determined, or ( #3) the City Council would retain the services of an outside investment firm to invest the City's cash at an annual cost that may range from $50,000 to $150,000. To ensure the City's best interests, it will be important to select a firm that would only benefit financially from the fee it is paid from the City and not from investment selections. Should the City Council accept the City Manager's recommendation the resolution authorizing the Finance Director /City Treasurer's salary increase and the approval of the Finance Director /City Treasurer position will be presented to the City Council at the October 15, 2013 council meeting. If the City Council decides to pursue one of the alternatives presented, staff will provide requ s d in format t the City Council's direction. �i J ff . Parker it pager