Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWORKSHOP - TUSTIN LEGACYCITY OF TUSTIN DECEMBER 5, 2013 SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL -- 300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN Charles E. "Chuck" Puckett, Mayor Pro Tem Jeffrey C. Parker, City Manager John Nielsen, Councilmember Al Murray, Mayor David E. Kendig, City Attorney Rebecca "Beckie" Gomez, Councilmember Jeffrey C. Parker, City Clerk Allan Bernstein, Councilmember Pam Arends-King, City Treasurer SPECIAL MEETING 300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN COUNCIL CHAMBER DECEMBER 5, 2013 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER — Meeting #2334 ROLL CALL — City Clerk PUBLIC INPUT — Members of the public may address the City Council on the Special Meeting Agenda item. 1. WORKSHOP: TUSTIN LEGACY REMAINING SITES On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding the disposition of the remaining City -owned sites at Tustin Legacy. The City Council provided staff with comments, direction, and authorized staff to hire The Planning Center to conduct further analysis on Tustin Legacy remaining sites. This report and the PowerPoint attachment summaries The Planning Center study outcomes. Recommendation: That the City Council receive the study and provide staff with direction on the next steps. ADJOURNMENT — The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. for the Closed Session Meeting followed by the Regular Business Meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. NOTE: As required by Senate Bill 343, any non -confidential writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council members regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office located at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA during normal business hours. AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2013 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agenda Item Reviewed: Finance Director SUBJECT: WORKSHOP: TUSTIN LEGACY REMAINING SITES SUMMARY: On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding the disposition of the remaining City -owned sites at Tustin Legacy. The City Council provided staff with comments, direction, and authorized staff to hire The Planning Center to conduct further analysis on Tustin Legacy remaining sites. This report and the PowerPoint attachment summarizes The Planning Center study outcomes. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the study and provide staff with direction on the next steps. BACKGROUND: On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding Tustin Legacy remaining sites. At the workshop, the following topical areas were discussed: Current Land Uses: Following the closure of the base, the City adopted the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan is the zoning of the property and sets the rules of the land for Tustin Legacy. For planning purposes, Tustin Legacy is organized into eight (8) neighborhoods. The neighborhood identifies generally what is intended to be developed in that area. City Owned Sites: After the contract was terminated with the Master Developer, the City prepared a Disposition Strategy and the City Council, at the time, authorized the City to take over the remaining sites and act as the land developer. In this role, the City became responsible for marketing and selling the remaining sites to builders. City Council Workshop December 5, 2013 Page 2 As the land developer, the City entered into agreements with several developments potential as follows: • The Irvine Company - 533 apartments • St. Anton - 225 affordable apartments • Standard Pacific Corp. - 375 detached homes • The Regency - commercial center The remaining sites include areas within Neighborhoods D, E, and G with development potential as follows: • Neighborhood D: 358 residential units, 4,757,279 sqft. non-residential. • Neighborhood E: 1,267,324 sqft. non-residential . • Neighborhood G: 614 dwelling units,466.637 sqft. non-residential. The City Council was asked at the workshop if a study should be completed to determine if development at Tustin Legacy should continue as planned or if new opportunities should be explored taking advantage of the changing market conditions as well as ensuring quality development occurs. Linear Park: The prior master development concept included a Linear Park concept. There are a total of 170 acres of open space that are planned across Tustin Legacy with a linear connectivity to all neighborhoods. The City Council was asked if this concept is still the desire and/or if additional flexibility/opportunities could be explored. • Bridges: At the time when the Tustin Legacy Community Partners developed a Concept Plan, several vehicular and pedestrian bridges were introduced. These bridges include some iconic features that are costly to build. Recognizing the City's limited finances, the City Council was asked if these bridges should remain or should other alternatives be explored. • Opportunities and Constraints: Several opportunities and constraints were discussed showing where the City is at current time and where the City could be in the near and distant future. Since the workshop, the Planning Center and staff have worked diligently to find out if new alternatives should be explored considering new market conditions, neighboring cities developments, and the desire to create a sense of place and unique identity for Tustin Legacy. Additionally, to avoid disjointed development from occurring, the following seven guiding principals were used in study: 1. Preserve Linear Park concept; 2. Maximize connectivity; 3. Ensure adequate circulation systems; 4. Promote quality design, architecture, and landscaping; 5. Create a sense of identity and place; Ci+y Council Workshop December 5, 2013 Page 3 6. Develop enhanced mix of land uses; and, 7. Address building form, design, and placement. The attached presentation would guide the City Council with a summary where we left off at the last workshop, 4he analysis by The Planning Center as to alternatives to explore, the next steps should the City Council decide to amend the Specific Pian, and the potential challenges that might surface as a result of any amendments. The Planning Center and City staff will be available at the workshop to present the new study and answer any questions that the City Council may have. Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachment= PowerPoint Presentation ACParker er Tustin Legacy New Nlic;i(%n City Council Presentation December 5, 2013 ConceotS TUSTIN LEGACY ... June 29, 20137 City Council Workshop Topical Areas Discussed: Current Land Uses City Owned Sites Linear Park Bridges Opportunities and Concerns Council comments and direction The Planning Center Study TUSTIN LEGACY JCP Introduction Prioritizing Development & Revisiting the Plan Existing MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Land Uses City -owned Neighborhoods Disposition Strategy Laying the Foundation Existing Development Projects Under Construction or Pending Remaining Neighborhoods TUSTIN LEGACY JCP Vision Concepts Guiding Principles Concepts Circulation Connectivity and Parks Transit Oriented Development Senior Community Entertainment District Business Park "Green Rooms" Identity and Place What the Alternatives Means Next Steps TUSTIN LEGACY JCP Changing market conditions Implementation of private development Comprehensive park planning Backbone Infrastructure Tustin Ranch Road Barranca Channel improvements Armstrong Avenue WarnerAvenue JCP Neighborhoods A — Education Village 6 — Village Housing C — Regional Park D — Community Core E — Employment Center F — Regional -Oriented Commerc G — Residential Core H — Irvine Residential TUSTIN LEGACY Neighborhoods GH 6 TI IQTI K1 I ET A nV Neighborhood B- 248,292 sqft. non -res Neighborhood D- 891 residential units 4,757,992 sqft. non -res Neighborhood E- 1,267,324 sqft. non -res Neighborhood G- 1,214 residential units 466,637 sqft. non -res i wan, cwu Adopted in April 2011 by City Council TUSTIN LEGACY Purpose — Implementation Strategy for the 800 acre "Former Master Developer Footprint" Analysis of Tustin Legacy Market Analysis — Residential Uses Market Analysis — Commercial Uses SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats) TI ICTI KI I Cr A nV ■ Heritage _- Elementary, ■ OC Family Campus ■ ATEP x. s ■ SOCCD ■ OC Rescue Mission ■ Sheriff's Training Facility Education F L .e District The District I Columbus Grove LAYING THE FOUNDATION: Projects Under Construction or Pending City of Tustin Community Pi • 24 acres i Orange County Regional Park Potential ArW. Reserve Site OWN,, -. .1 ,gency Center Approx. 22 acres 103,000 sf Retai 1145,000 sf Gene lfice 2etai service Commerc R Standard Pacific ■ Approx. 80 acres ■ 375 SFD ' 6.1 acre Focal Park :.y, .., 0 St. Anton ■ Approx. 8 acres }` ■ Neighborhood G ■ 225 Affordable Apartments 4.7 acres Victory Park Existing Army _ 'EAB .�' Reserve Site LAYING THE FOUNDATION: Remaining Neighborhoods TUSTIN LEGACY 170 Acre Space/Park ;E:' ►3 �- 358 du ■ 4.7 million sgft.'q' non-res 37 -res . ` 1.2 Ai million sf. _ �1, non-res . .. :- r EAB .r 1. Preserve Linear Park concept. 2. Maximize connectivity. Adequate circulation systems. TUSTIN LEGACY 4. Promote quality design, architecture, and landscaping. 5 Create a sense of identity and place. Mix of land uses. Address building form, design, and placement. Introduce concepts Conversion of uses without exceeding trip cap Balancing residential and non-residential uses Additional Mixed Use areas Opportunity for Transit Oriented Development Water, trails, active recreation as a focal point Creating a sense of identity Signage Landscape Building placement and form TUSTIN LEGACY ZJ Senior Community - 25 acres Retail/Office ■ 22 acres 248,000 sf� -..i Residential ■ 14 acres TUSTIN LEGACY TOD gym. ■ 43 acres ■ 1,085 du Residential ■ 17 acres TUSD Sited"7777 -777 9 dui 40 acres Residential 19 acres 287 Park and Sports dr _ Complex Commercial Residential New Reserve Site 125 acres 17 acres • 19 acres ■ 14.5 acres • 225,000 sf ' 250 cru: h Commercial/ Business Park/ Incubator • 56 acres • 734,000 sf Commercial/ Business Pai Incubator 43 acres 508,000 sf 4 Residential Non - Residential 2,824 du 4,165,600 sf 3,640 du 3,260,942 sf Open 146 ac 24 ac Space 6,464 du 7,426,542 sf 170 ac 4,601 du 9,256,731 sf 170 ac TUSTIN LEGACY Difference L J� am Over 1,863 du Under 1,830,189 sf VISION CONCEPTS: Corporate Campus /TUSTIN LEGAACY �W-- 71-1k 3-r T F Jr / , ,t ., ...,. r. r v '' r Corporate Campus) • 84 acres 0,000 st Jill RJ lam TUSTIN LEGACY Development Entitled or Potential Allowed by Difference Potential for Built Project- Legacy SP Remaining wide Total liw Neighborhoods AM A Residential Non - Residential Open Space 1,962 du 5,026,970 sf 146 ac 3,640 du 3,260,942 sf 24 ac 6,563 du 4,601 du 8,287,912 sf 9,256,731 sf 170 ac 170 ac Over 1,001 du Under 968,819 sf VISION CONCEPTS Circulation �J TESTI N LEGACY Pedestrian Trails 12-20 feet wide Bicycle Connection to existing neighborhoods across Jamboree Connection to Tustin Metrolink Station 170 Acres of Park Land �e ti� ���• � k1X MGRR 1` � ,• ■ ■e■■e ■ ■■ii ■if VISION CONCEPTS Connectivity and Parks /�TUSTIN LEGAACY i 1 , � Yi r4■Y■ ■■ �l. Ilk VISION CONCEPTS Connectivity and Parks Public Space Community Programming Use of water On site water retention Increase property values Creating a sense of place Water as focal point Analogues TUSTIN LEGACY .1 Transit Oriented D /r�� \.�•� ■z :n� � � _ . � - �2�� • ,_ .,� . � •��/�/ � r.. _ .. .§ � & � •� � . . � � .�� : ��, 7y �� ■ . -� � {\ � . r - �:� �. 10{ \ 2 Transit Oriented Development R MW 0 Transit Oriented Development :[i a i cilli .r.. i Transit Oriented D Transit Oriented Development I � _ a Pd Pq ■s y 4 .& 11 0 ffitm t +1 I t 4. . • Transit Oriented Development r a.41 t. 6f. iii "Q"N� a y.+i �' AWm Transit Oriented Development u '} •f Oil •r• in n� F� �� � � yl Transit Oriented Development �`:. ;�•M nn�:wAww�....� .• P� - ��... � y,.Nf'�S�J!*nrrp�� Ra Fa Transit Oriented Development f't S �•,Y i �. '+l�i`��,Y'� +�. '� .�9r:r ~� .'J3f.f !.•i':. sir •'�i{�� .�L-' -� +. TOD: Town Plan �_ / 'ter' !' • ` i �'. j -� _ !.� !' 7 ` , �,��'1 , �r i`� � �r'�V•, ` %, ti 1 r f \\. , �r �;,lr„II. Af r�, �_ �`� ��_,. ��' r�q� ��q'•, ;�� ®R el RJ Senior Community AW k16 AIML Senior Community I F iL gIlli ,�, Opp .......... a • Alternative to corporate campus Mixed use- flexibility Introduces a different product type TUSTIN LEGACY Main Street • 21 acres Mixed Use Main Street -- „ Mf Y44. ? �� lwa'7�1 I -- �'"m 'i� R 'Y 9 1 F AIM Mixed Use Main Street .10 ,1 a3t.. TI ioyi ■I 1 r9% A AV r milk qr a', RJ VISION CONCEPTS Adjacent Residential Rafsr■ 'pup TUSTIN LEGACY Supports sports complex Hotel(s) Use water as focal point Uses south hangar as a backdrop for special events Car shows Community Concerts Etc. RJ Sports Complex ----------------- �ft �4 *I �r. - OWN Hard-edge/ Soft -edge Lake .r. i * - �'�,i �Wy�H 1E � 9• I -M II f z moi- - Entertainment District .• � ��I.S rF r��■ �r ` —.. Fly hL, More, iowipns caning s �.� am "P!AM6� y'+Nlli�l� MI 1- N _ I ms's• � r � ... Entertainment District L The mokpys Hoxrx�lr wn Iah � r -._ �, `' Ilxrirrn i r 111 I LL + A • 0Rif�w r . ` IT 4..i �,7 Entertainment District RION. A it Flexible workspace Connecting public and private open space Attractive feature to a variety of firms R&D Incubators Tech industry TUSTIN LEGACY i RJ VISION CONCEPTS: Business Park "Green Rooms" 7wft�_µ-- _: _ -_ �_ . _-- Y. VISION CONCEPTS: Identity and Place Necessary amendments to the Specific Plan: TOD near Metrolink Station- PA 15 Add: Transit Oriented Development zoning and standards Main Street Mixed -Use in D- PA 19 Review and update: MU zoning in PA 19 Add flexibility to adapt to market through zoning Mixed -Use Entertainment District in D- PA 19 TUSTIN LEGACY Review and update: Support development of sports complex and hotel(s) Form -based standards and design guidelines Transfer of trips between planning areas Revise park plan, trails, and connectivity AM • MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Amendment •CEQA • Street and Trail Sections • Parcelization for Development • Implementations TUSTIN LEGACY Aw. � 1 � TUSTIN LEGACY • Recap • Did we hit the mark? • Questions? //TUSTIN LEGACY TUSTIN LEGACY Project Alternative Spreadsheet SUMMARY Corp Campus Main Street Alternative #1 Alternative #2 Land Use SP Rates SP Rates Sub -Area D (8,13 & 14) Remaining Trip CAP 80,495 80,495 Sub -Area D Trips 56,009 72,775 Exceeds Sub -Area D Trip CAP? NO N0 Sub -Area E (9-12) Remaining Trip CAP 17,975 17,975 Sub -Area E Trips 15,153 18,628 Exceeds Sub -Area E Trip CAP? N❑ YES Sub -Area F [16] Remaining Trip CAP 1,151 1,151 Sub -Area F Trips 2,459 2,459 Exceeds Sub -Area F Trip CAP? YES YES Sub -Area G (15) Remaining Trip CAP 26,076 26,076 Sub -Area G Trips 27,510 27,510 Exceeds Sub -Area G Trip CAP? YES YES Total Trip CAP for Neighborhoods ■ [I Spec ific P la n Tri ps i n M odified S ub-Areas Ove rall Tri p Ca p■ ■