HomeMy WebLinkAboutWORKSHOP - TUSTIN LEGACYCITY OF TUSTIN DECEMBER 5, 2013
SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBER
OF THE CITY COUNCIL -- 300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN
Charles E. "Chuck" Puckett, Mayor Pro Tem Jeffrey C. Parker, City Manager
John Nielsen, Councilmember Al Murray, Mayor David E. Kendig, City Attorney
Rebecca "Beckie" Gomez, Councilmember Jeffrey C. Parker, City Clerk
Allan Bernstein, Councilmember Pam Arends-King, City Treasurer
SPECIAL MEETING
300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN
COUNCIL CHAMBER
DECEMBER 5, 2013
5:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER — Meeting #2334
ROLL CALL — City Clerk
PUBLIC INPUT — Members of the public may address the City Council on the Special
Meeting Agenda item.
1. WORKSHOP: TUSTIN LEGACY REMAINING SITES
On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding the disposition
of the remaining City -owned sites at Tustin Legacy. The City Council provided staff
with comments, direction, and authorized staff to hire The Planning Center to
conduct further analysis on Tustin Legacy remaining sites. This report and the
PowerPoint attachment summaries The Planning Center study outcomes.
Recommendation: That the City Council receive the study and provide staff with
direction on the next steps.
ADJOURNMENT — The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at
5:30 p.m. for the Closed Session Meeting followed by the Regular Business Meeting at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
NOTE: As required by Senate Bill 343, any non -confidential writings or
documents provided to a majority of the City Council members regarding any
item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk's
office located at 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA during normal business hours.
AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2013
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Agenda Item
Reviewed:
Finance Director
SUBJECT: WORKSHOP: TUSTIN LEGACY REMAINING SITES
SUMMARY:
On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding the disposition of
the remaining City -owned sites at Tustin Legacy. The City Council provided staff with
comments, direction, and authorized staff to hire The Planning Center to conduct further
analysis on Tustin Legacy remaining sites. This report and the PowerPoint attachment
summarizes The Planning Center study outcomes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive the study and provide staff with direction on the next
steps.
BACKGROUND:
On June 29, 2013, the City Council conducted a workshop regarding Tustin Legacy
remaining sites. At the workshop, the following topical areas were discussed:
Current Land Uses: Following the closure of the base, the City adopted the
MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan is the zoning of the
property and sets the rules of the land for Tustin Legacy. For planning purposes,
Tustin Legacy is organized into eight (8) neighborhoods. The neighborhood
identifies generally what is intended to be developed in that area.
City Owned Sites: After the contract was terminated with the Master Developer,
the City prepared a Disposition Strategy and the City Council, at the time,
authorized the City to take over the remaining sites and act as the land
developer. In this role, the City became responsible for marketing and selling the
remaining sites to builders.
City Council Workshop
December 5, 2013
Page 2
As the land developer, the City entered into agreements with several
developments potential as follows:
• The Irvine Company - 533 apartments
• St. Anton - 225 affordable apartments
• Standard Pacific Corp. - 375 detached homes
• The Regency - commercial center
The remaining sites include areas within Neighborhoods D, E, and G with
development potential as follows:
• Neighborhood D: 358 residential units, 4,757,279 sqft. non-residential.
• Neighborhood E: 1,267,324 sqft. non-residential .
• Neighborhood G: 614 dwelling units,466.637 sqft. non-residential.
The City Council was asked at the workshop if a study should be completed to
determine if development at Tustin Legacy should continue as planned or if new
opportunities should be explored taking advantage of the changing market
conditions as well as ensuring quality development occurs.
Linear Park: The prior master development concept included a Linear Park
concept. There are a total of 170 acres of open space that are planned across
Tustin Legacy with a linear connectivity to all neighborhoods. The City Council
was asked if this concept is still the desire and/or if additional
flexibility/opportunities could be explored.
• Bridges: At the time when the Tustin Legacy Community Partners developed a
Concept Plan, several vehicular and pedestrian bridges were introduced. These
bridges include some iconic features that are costly to build. Recognizing the
City's limited finances, the City Council was asked if these bridges should remain
or should other alternatives be explored.
• Opportunities and Constraints: Several opportunities and constraints were
discussed showing where the City is at current time and where the City could be
in the near and distant future.
Since the workshop, the Planning Center and staff have worked diligently to find out if
new alternatives should be explored considering new market conditions, neighboring
cities developments, and the desire to create a sense of place and unique identity for
Tustin Legacy. Additionally, to avoid disjointed development from occurring, the
following seven guiding principals were used in study:
1. Preserve Linear Park concept;
2. Maximize connectivity;
3. Ensure adequate circulation systems;
4. Promote quality design, architecture, and landscaping;
5. Create a sense of identity and place;
Ci+y Council Workshop
December 5, 2013
Page 3
6. Develop enhanced mix of land uses; and,
7. Address building form, design, and placement.
The attached presentation would guide the City Council with a summary where we left
off at the last workshop, 4he analysis by The Planning Center as to alternatives to
explore, the next steps should the City Council decide to amend the Specific Pian, and
the potential challenges that might surface as a result of any amendments.
The Planning Center and City staff will be available at the workshop to present the new
study and answer any questions that the City Council may have.
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attachment= PowerPoint Presentation
ACParker
er
Tustin Legacy
New Nlic;i(%n
City Council Presentation
December 5, 2013
ConceotS TUSTIN LEGACY
...
June 29, 20137 City Council Workshop
Topical Areas Discussed:
Current Land Uses
City Owned Sites
Linear Park
Bridges
Opportunities and Concerns
Council comments and direction
The Planning Center Study
TUSTIN LEGACY
JCP
Introduction
Prioritizing Development & Revisiting the Plan
Existing MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Land Uses
City -owned Neighborhoods
Disposition Strategy
Laying the Foundation
Existing Development
Projects Under Construction or Pending
Remaining Neighborhoods
TUSTIN LEGACY
JCP
Vision Concepts
Guiding Principles
Concepts
Circulation
Connectivity and Parks
Transit Oriented Development
Senior Community
Entertainment District
Business Park "Green Rooms"
Identity and Place
What the Alternatives Means
Next Steps
TUSTIN LEGACY
JCP
Changing market conditions
Implementation of private development
Comprehensive park planning
Backbone Infrastructure
Tustin Ranch Road
Barranca Channel improvements
Armstrong Avenue
WarnerAvenue
JCP
Neighborhoods
A — Education Village
6 — Village Housing
C — Regional Park
D — Community Core
E — Employment Center
F — Regional -Oriented Commerc
G — Residential Core
H — Irvine Residential
TUSTIN LEGACY
Neighborhoods
GH 6
TI IQTI K1 I ET A nV
Neighborhood B-
248,292 sqft. non -res
Neighborhood D-
891 residential units
4,757,992 sqft. non -res
Neighborhood E-
1,267,324 sqft. non -res
Neighborhood G-
1,214 residential units
466,637 sqft. non -res
i
wan,
cwu
Adopted in April 2011 by City Council
TUSTIN LEGACY
Purpose — Implementation Strategy for the 800 acre
"Former Master Developer Footprint"
Analysis of Tustin Legacy
Market Analysis — Residential Uses
Market Analysis — Commercial Uses
SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats)
TI ICTI KI I Cr A nV
■ Heritage _-
Elementary,
■ OC Family
Campus
■ ATEP x. s
■ SOCCD
■ OC Rescue
Mission
■ Sheriff's
Training
Facility
Education F
L .e
District
The
District
I
Columbus
Grove
LAYING THE FOUNDATION:
Projects Under Construction or Pending
City of Tustin
Community Pi
• 24 acres
i
Orange County
Regional Park
Potential ArW.
Reserve Site
OWN,, -.
.1
,gency Center
Approx. 22 acres
103,000 sf Retai
1145,000 sf Gene lfice
2etai service Commerc
R Standard Pacific
■ Approx. 80 acres
■ 375 SFD
' 6.1 acre Focal
Park
:.y, ..,
0
St. Anton
■ Approx. 8 acres }`
■ Neighborhood G
■ 225 Affordable
Apartments
4.7 acres Victory Park
Existing Army _ 'EAB
.�'
Reserve Site
LAYING THE FOUNDATION:
Remaining Neighborhoods
TUSTIN LEGACY
170 Acre
Space/Park
;E:' ►3
�- 358 du
■ 4.7 million sgft.'q'
non-res
37
-res
. `
1.2
Ai
million sf. _ �1,
non-res . .. :- r
EAB
.r
1. Preserve Linear Park concept.
2. Maximize connectivity.
Adequate circulation systems.
TUSTIN LEGACY
4. Promote quality design, architecture, and landscaping.
5 Create a sense of identity and place.
Mix of land uses.
Address building form, design, and placement.
Introduce concepts
Conversion of uses without exceeding trip cap
Balancing residential and non-residential uses
Additional Mixed Use areas
Opportunity for Transit Oriented Development
Water, trails, active recreation as a focal point
Creating a sense of identity
Signage
Landscape
Building placement and form
TUSTIN LEGACY
ZJ
Senior Community
- 25 acres
Retail/Office
■ 22 acres
248,000 sf�
-..i
Residential
■ 14 acres
TUSTIN LEGACY
TOD
gym.
■ 43 acres
■ 1,085 du
Residential
■ 17 acres
TUSD Sited"7777 -777 9 dui
40 acres Residential
19 acres
287
Park and Sports dr
_ Complex Commercial Residential
New Reserve Site 125 acres 17 acres • 19 acres
■ 14.5 acres • 225,000 sf ' 250 cru: h
Commercial/
Business Park/
Incubator
• 56 acres
• 734,000 sf
Commercial/
Business Pai
Incubator
43 acres
508,000 sf
4
Residential
Non -
Residential
2,824 du
4,165,600 sf
3,640 du
3,260,942 sf
Open 146 ac 24 ac
Space
6,464 du
7,426,542 sf
170 ac
4,601 du
9,256,731 sf
170 ac
TUSTIN LEGACY
Difference
L J� am
Over
1,863 du
Under
1,830,189 sf
VISION CONCEPTS:
Corporate Campus /TUSTIN LEGAACY
�W--
71-1k
3-r
T F
Jr
/ , ,t ., ...,. r. r v '' r
Corporate Campus)
• 84 acres
0,000 st
Jill
RJ
lam
TUSTIN LEGACY
Development Entitled or Potential Allowed by Difference
Potential for Built Project- Legacy SP
Remaining wide Total
liw Neighborhoods AM A
Residential
Non -
Residential
Open
Space
1,962 du
5,026,970 sf
146 ac
3,640 du
3,260,942 sf
24 ac
6,563 du
4,601 du
8,287,912 sf 9,256,731 sf
170 ac 170 ac
Over
1,001 du
Under
968,819 sf
VISION CONCEPTS
Circulation
�J
TESTI N LEGACY
Pedestrian
Trails 12-20 feet wide
Bicycle
Connection to existing neighborhoods across Jamboree
Connection to Tustin Metrolink Station
170 Acres of Park Land
�e
ti� ���• � k1X MGRR
1` � ,•
■
■e■■e
■ ■■ii ■if
VISION CONCEPTS
Connectivity and Parks /�TUSTIN LEGAACY
i
1 , �
Yi r4■Y■ ■■ �l.
Ilk
VISION CONCEPTS
Connectivity and Parks
Public Space
Community Programming
Use of water
On site water retention
Increase property values
Creating a sense of place
Water as focal point
Analogues
TUSTIN LEGACY
.1
Transit Oriented D
/r�� \.�•� ■z :n� �
� _ .
� -
�2��
• ,_
.,� .
� •��/�/ � r..
_
.. .§
�
&
� •� � . . � �
.��
: ��,
7y
��
■ . -�
� {\
�
.
r
-
�:�
�.
10{
\
2
Transit Oriented Development
R
MW
0
Transit Oriented Development
:[i a
i
cilli .r..
i
Transit Oriented D
Transit Oriented Development
I � _ a
Pd
Pq
■s y 4
.& 11
0 ffitm
t +1 I t
4. . •
Transit Oriented Development
r
a.41
t. 6f.
iii
"Q"N� a y.+i
�' AWm
Transit Oriented Development
u
'} •f
Oil
•r• in n� F� �� � � yl
Transit Oriented Development
�`:. ;�•M
nn�:wAww�....� .• P� - ��... � y,.Nf'�S�J!*nrrp�� Ra
Fa
Transit Oriented Development
f't S �•,Y i �.
'+l�i`��,Y'� +�. '� .�9r:r ~� .'J3f.f !.•i':. sir •'�i{�� .�L-' -� +.
TOD: Town Plan
�_ / 'ter' !' • ` i �'. j -� _ !.� !' 7 ` , �,��'1
, �r i`� � �r'�V•, ` %, ti 1 r f \\. , �r �;,lr„II. Af r�, �_ �`� ��_,.
��' r�q� ��q'•, ;�� ®R
el
RJ
Senior Community
AW
k16 AIML
Senior Community
I F
iL
gIlli ,�,
Opp
..........
a
• Alternative to corporate campus
Mixed use- flexibility
Introduces a different product type
TUSTIN LEGACY
Main Street
• 21 acres
Mixed Use Main Street
-- „ Mf
Y44.
? ��
lwa'7�1 I -- �'"m 'i�
R 'Y
9
1
F
AIM
Mixed Use Main Street
.10
,1
a3t..
TI ioyi ■I 1 r9% A AV
r
milk
qr a',
RJ
VISION CONCEPTS
Adjacent Residential
Rafsr■
'pup
TUSTIN LEGACY
Supports sports complex
Hotel(s)
Use water as focal point
Uses south hangar as a backdrop for special events
Car shows
Community Concerts
Etc.
RJ
Sports Complex
-----------------
�ft
�4
*I
�r. -
OWN
Hard-edge/ Soft -edge Lake
.r.
i
*
- �'�,i �Wy�H 1E � 9•
I
-M II f z
moi- -
Entertainment District
.• � ��I.S rF r��■ �r
` —.. Fly hL,
More, iowipns caning s �.�
am "P!AM6�
y'+Nlli�l�
MI
1- N
_ I ms's• � r � ...
Entertainment District
L
The mokpys Hoxrx�lr wn Iah �
r
-._
�, `' Ilxrirrn i
r 111 I
LL
+ A
• 0Rif�w r
. ` IT
4..i �,7
Entertainment District
RION.
A it
Flexible workspace
Connecting public and private open space
Attractive feature to a variety of firms
R&D
Incubators
Tech industry
TUSTIN LEGACY
i
RJ
VISION CONCEPTS:
Business Park "Green Rooms"
7wft�_µ-- _: _ -_ �_ . _-- Y.
VISION CONCEPTS:
Identity and Place
Necessary amendments to the Specific Plan:
TOD near Metrolink Station- PA 15
Add: Transit Oriented Development zoning and standards
Main Street Mixed -Use in D- PA 19
Review and update: MU zoning in PA 19
Add flexibility to adapt to market through zoning
Mixed -Use Entertainment District in D- PA 19
TUSTIN LEGACY
Review and update: Support development of sports complex and hotel(s)
Form -based standards and design guidelines
Transfer of trips between planning areas
Revise park plan, trails, and connectivity
AM
• MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Amendment
•CEQA
• Street and Trail Sections
• Parcelization for Development
• Implementations
TUSTIN LEGACY
Aw.
� 1 �
TUSTIN LEGACY
• Recap
• Did we hit the mark?
• Questions?
//TUSTIN LEGACY
TUSTIN LEGACY
Project Alternative Spreadsheet
SUMMARY
Corp Campus
Main Street
Alternative #1
Alternative #2
Land Use
SP Rates
SP Rates
Sub -Area D (8,13 & 14) Remaining Trip CAP
80,495
80,495
Sub -Area D Trips
56,009
72,775
Exceeds Sub -Area D Trip CAP?
NO
N0
Sub -Area E (9-12) Remaining Trip CAP
17,975
17,975
Sub -Area E Trips
15,153
18,628
Exceeds Sub -Area E Trip CAP?
N❑
YES
Sub -Area F [16] Remaining Trip CAP
1,151
1,151
Sub -Area F Trips
2,459
2,459
Exceeds Sub -Area F Trip CAP?
YES
YES
Sub -Area G (15) Remaining Trip CAP
26,076
26,076
Sub -Area G Trips
27,510
27,510
Exceeds Sub -Area G Trip CAP?
YES
YES
Total Trip CAP for Neighborhoods ■
[I Spec ific P la n Tri ps i n M odified S ub-Areas
Ove rall Tri p Ca p■
■