Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1997 02 18MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 18, 1997 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The meeting was called to order by Mayor Worley at 7:04 p.m. at the Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Thomas. INVOCATION ;The Invocation was given by Captain Lee Lescano, Salvation Army Church. ROLL CALL Council Present: Tracy Wills Worley, Mayor Jeffery M. Thomas, Mayor Pro Tem Mike Doyle Thomas R. Saltarelli Council Absent: Jim Potts City Clerk: Pamela Stoker Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager George Jeffries, City Treasurer Elizabeth Binsack, Director of Com. Development Steve Foster, Acting Chief of Police Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Tim Serlet, Director of Public Works Mike Henley, Director of Community Services .Dana Kasdan, Engineering Services Manager Rita Westfield, Asst. Dir./Com. Development Martin Pastucha, Field Services Manager Valerie Crabill, Chief Deputy City Clerk Scott Reekstin, Associate Planner Sara Pashalides, Associate Planner Dan Fox, Senior Planner Rick Zimmer, Redevelopment Program Manager Bettie Correa, Senior Personnel Analyst Approximately 170 in the audience PUBLIC INPUT OLD TOWN DIRECTIONAL SIGNS Phil Cox, Brookings, OR, reported on the background of the Old Town directional sign project; commended Council, staff, business and community members for their support; and noted that the project would be completed with the installation of the tenth and final sign. CITIZEN COMPLAINT - WATER BILL DELIVERY Robert Wehn, 18082 Lillian Way, Tustin, complained that his water bill was not received in a timely manner and questioned if the delay was due to processing assistance from Senior Center volunteers. PRESENTATIONS (ITEMS 1 THROUGH 2) i2. TUSTIN OLD TOWN ASSOCIATION (Agenda order) Mayor Worley announced this item would be taken out of agenda order at Dr. Stanford's request. Dr. William Stanford, Tustin Old Town Association President, thanked Council and staff for supporting the formation of the Association; introduced the Association Officers; stated that the Association's goal was to preserve the Old Town atmosphere; said the first-year plan included creating a stable organization, developing a broad membership, and implementing a business retention and outreach program through promotional campaigns and coordination with Old Town events"such as the Heritage Walk, Chili Cook -Off, and Tiller Days; and requested Council appropriate $15,000 to the Association the first year, $25,000 the second CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 2-18-97 year, and $50,000 per year to fund the commercial rehabilitation program. He said the Association anticipated working in cooperation with the City, Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Council, and business and property owners. Mayor Worley pledged continued Council support of the Old Town Association. The following members of the audience spoke in favor of the Tustin Old Town Business Association and thanked Council for their support: Leonard Nettles, 1913 Company Audrey Heredia, McCharles House 330-20 1. CORRIDOR MAJOR INVESTMENT STUDY PRESENTATION BY ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Nancy Michali, Orange County Transportation Authority, reported that transportation alternatives for the 28 -mile corridor from Fullerton to Irvine had been identified including increasing bus service, freeway and road improvements, and providing rail systems; and urged Council to forward recommendations to the Authority regarding the transportation alternatives. 750-90 2. TUSTIN OLD TOWN ASSOCIATION See page 1. PUBLIC HEARINGS (ITEMS 3 THROUGH 5) 3. APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-37 AND DESIGN REVIEW 96-51 (PLAZA LAFAYETTE PARKING LOT EXPANSION) Scott Reekstin, Associate Planner, reported that in December 1996, the applicant received approval from the City's Zoning Administrator to construct a parking area on a vacant abandoned railroad right-of-way located behind the Plaza Lafayette shopping center. He stated the project had been appealed; however, the Planning Commission upheld the Zoning Administrator's action with modifications to the Conditions of Approval. On January 17, 1997, an appeal was filed requesting Council review of the project. He noted the applicant's prior request to annex an abandoned railroad right-of-way to accommodate a larger parking area which was subsequently denied by Council.. He stated the applicant indicated additional parking was necessary for the center during peak hours; the proposed expansion would allow 36 additional parking spaces; the City could require additional parking if a study revealed a parking problem existed at the Plaza; Planning Commission requirements for the Plaza; appellant's objections to the proposed parking lot; the City had received several letters and a petition in opposition to the proposed project; Police Department opinion that the proposed project would improve security and provide Police access to the area; and modifications to Condition 2.1 included the words "or acceptable alternative" inserted following "wall" throughout the Condition. Mayor Worley opened the Public Hearing at 7:28 p.m. The following member of the audience spoke in opposition to Conditional Use Permit 96-037 and Design Review 96-051; however, if approved by Council, he requested additional conditions including a minimum 8 -foot solid masonry wall; landscaped with bougainvillea; lessee maintain the wall and landscaping; additional security be provided by either a full-time security guard or a 6 -foot high security gate with controlled access; hours of operation limited from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. seven days a week; special events be limited to a maximum of four per year; rodents eradicated prior to ground breaking; Community Development Director review twice per year the maintenance and other issues that might occur; lighting be directed downward; and the top of the light fixtures installed below the top of the wall: Robin Hayne, Woodcrest Apartment owners' representative CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 2-18-97 (submitted 123 signatures supporting the proposed conditions) The following member of the audience spoke in opposition to Conditional Use Permit 96-037 and Design Review 96-051; however, if approved by Council, she requested modifications to the Conditions of Approval I.H.5 adding "to the east," deleting "and/or carport," adding "to the west"; Exhibit A, 2. 1, adding "to rte- the west," and "in the event that the garages are removed in the future the property owner of the shopping center shall be required within 30 days of removal to begin construction of a 618" high solid block wall as a barrier in the exposed areas, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. The wall shall be completed no later than 60 days after demolition of the garages"; 2.5, "Six inch raised concrete curb shall be placed on site adjacent to the perimeter boundary walls and carport walls to the east"; 2.6, "all graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours of a complaint being transmitted by the City to the property owners, graffiti should be removed as quickly as possible"; 2.8, adding "no less than once per year"; 3. 1, deleting "unless additional City approvals are obtained"; 3.2, "the use of the parking lot expansion area shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director every six months. If in the future the Community Development Director determines that noise, security and other nuisance problems exist on the site or in the vicinity as a result of the establishment of the parking lot expansion, the Community Development Director shall require the applicant to provide additional mitigation measures"; 3.5, adding "this shall be limited to no more (inaudible) activities per year and no more than 2 consecutive days per activity": Kathy Pounds, 12923-B Newport, Tustin The following members of the audience spoke in opposition to Conditional Use Permit 96-037 and Design Review 96-051: Dee Anne Santos, 12919-B Newport, Tustin Lisa Schulte, 12923-F Newport, Tustin Barry Kirkpatrick, 12929-A Newport, Tustin Juan Lesa, 12929 Newport, Tustin Angela Prea, 12917-A Newport, Tustin Debra Johnson, 12905-B Newport, Tustin (speaking on behalf of children residing at the Woodcrest Apartments) Chris Jones, 12941-D Newport, Tustin Nancy Ramage, Woodcrest Apartments owner Stephanie Irvin, 12931-E Newport, Tustin Denis Bilodeau, on behalf of Supervisor Todd Spitzer Terry Jones, Woodcrest Apartments Manager Nancy Hamilton, Foothill Communities Association Cornell Hussan, 12905-A Newport, Tustin Chan Hie Park, Tustin Plaza Apartments owner Jeff Child, 12911 Newport, Tustin Denise Ildefonso, 12915-A Newport, Tustin Robert Wehn, 18082 Lillian Way, Tustin George Haltman, 14592 Clarissa Lane, Tustin Beverly Purkiser, 12917-A Newport, Tustin Sharon Ramage, 505 Alta Vista, Pasadena G. R. Ramage, Jr., Woodcrest Apartments owner Janet Scott Council/Speaker Haltman discussion followed regarding residents purchasing the subject property. The following members of the audience spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit 96-037 and Design Review 96-051: Unidentified Plaza Lafayette business owner Lynn Burnett, Plaza Lafayette owner David Knowlton, representing Southern Pacific Transportation Company Lawrence Buxton Scott Behm, Southern Pacific Transportation Company CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 2-18-97 There were no other speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed at 8:42 p.m. Steve Foster, Acting Chief of Police, reported that the proposed parking lot would provide increased Police access; the fence currently surrounding the subject area prohibited Police entry; the area'was unlit; an 8 -foot wall, lighting, and parking limited to Plaza employees would provide additional security for the apartments; remarked on the low call for service at the Plaza; and the Police Department would respond to any problems occurring in the subject area Council/staff discussion followed clarifying that the proposed parking lot was located in Tustin Police Department jurisdiction and the Woodcrest Apartments were located in the Orange County Sheriff's Department jurisdiction; and both agencies assisted each other on calls for service by taking courtesy reports when necessary. Councilmember Doyle addressed concerns raised by speakers including that a fire hydrant was not necessary in the parking lot; the area was weed infested; an 8 -foot fence would be difficult to climb; the probability of employees using the parking lot after 11 p.m. was minimal; opposed continuing the item; the 8 - foot fence would prohibit children playing in the parking lot; it was the responsibility of employers to provide safety for their employees the proposed parking lot would provide additional security for the apartments' residents; and he did not believe the residents would purchase the entire property. Mayor Worley stated she originally had supported the proposed parking; said that the lot would provide improved security; noted the success of the Plaza Lafayette; remarked on inadequate parking at the Plaza; supported maintaining open space in the City; stated that the speakers' concerns regarding noise had changed her position on the subject; said she was hopeful that Mr. Ramage was sincere regarding purchasing the land; supported the area as a pathway, park, or open space; and she opposed the proposed parking lot. Council/speakers discussion followed regarding the property owners purchasing the land; and extending the regional trail. Mayor Pro Tem Thomas encouraged discussions between Supervisor Spitzer's Office, Southern Pacific, and staff for possible parking alternatives if the property owners did not purchase the subject property; he was opposed to the land remaining abandoned; supported the best use of the land; and encouraged adjacent property owners to discuss purchasing the land. Lois Jeffrey, City Attorney, clarified that a matter appealed to Council was stayed unless Council majority voted to take action to reverse or modify the Planning Commission decision within 60 days. Council/staff discussion followed regarding if the matter was reversed without prejudice, it could be brought before Council or the Planning Commission at a future date; waive applicant re- application fees; and it was necessary for property owners and Southern Pacific Transportation to conduct land purchase discussions as soon as possible. Councilmember Saltarelli stated that security was not an issue, but he believed noise would be a problem; he did not want to negatively impact the Woodcrest Apartment residents by constructing a parking lot; favored building a bike trail on the land; the necessity to explore alternatives to resolve the Plaza's parking problem; he had changed his original opinion of approving the parking lot; and he supported reversing the Planning Commission's decision to approve the parking lot without prejudice in order to investigate land use and parking alternatives. It was moved by Saltarelli. seconded by Thomas, to reverse the Planning Commission's decision regarding approval of Conditional Use Permit 96-37 and Design Review 96-51 (Plaza Lafayette Parking CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 2-18-97 lot expansion) without prejudice. Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent. 610-40 Mayor Worley recessed the meeting at 9:22 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 p.m. 4. ZONE CHANGE 96-2 (SANDERSON J. RAY DEVELOPMENT CO.) Sara Pashalides, Associate Planner, reported the applicant was proposing to amend the East Tustin Specific Plan to change Neighborhood Commercial District setback standards from 35 feet to 20 feet for single story developments adjacent to residential developments. She stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the zone change; the site was currently developed with a retail commercial center; the proposed zone change would affect the remaining vacant pad at the south end of the shopping center; the proposed changes were less restrictive for one story developments to encourage low profile buildings of a residential character; the setbacks for two-story developments would remain the same; the proposed reduction was consistent with the General Plan and the East Tustin Specific Plan providing adequate space for buffering and visual separation; 25 feet would remain between developments; and the zone change would encourage single story developments in residential areas. Council/staff discussion followed regarding amending the Specific Plan relating to Neighborhood Commercial District only; a retail/office project was proposed for the site; the proposed project was a single story development; Council concern with decreasing setbacks; adjacent property setbacks in the City; notices were mailed to adjacent property owners; the City did not receive opposition to the project; and the proposed retail property square footage. Mayor Worley opened the Public Hearing at 9:38 p.m. There were no speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Thomas seconded b -Doyle, to adopt the following Resolution No. 97-11 approving the Environmental Determination for the project: RESOLUTION NO. 97-11 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) CERTIFIED FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (FINAL EIR 85-2, AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDA) IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR ZONE CHANGE 96-2 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Motion carried 4-04 Potts absent. 610-60 It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to have first reading by title only and introduction of ordinance No. 1179. Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent. The City Clerk read the following Ordinance No. 1179 by title only: ORDINANCE NO. 1179 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 96-2 AMENDING SUBSECTION 4 OF SECTION 3.7.3.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN RELATED TO SETBACK STANDARDS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT FOR SINGLE -STORY DEVELOPMENTS 5. APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-33 (PACIFIC AUTO PARTS) Sara Pashalides, Associate Planner, reported that the applicant was requesting authorization to permit outdoor storage for three military vehicles and two metal storage containers at 125 West Main Street. She stated the military vehicles and one storage bin were stored in the front parking lot visible from Main Street; the rear parking lot contained vehicles and outdoor storage visible CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 2-18-97 from the public alley and adjacent properties to the north and partially shielded from view from surrounding properties; the chain link fencing was used for security and was open during business hours for customer parking and closed after business hours to provide security for the vehicles as well as the storage bins; the Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit on January 13, 1997; Council appealed the item at their January 20, 1997 meeting; and alternatives Council could approve requiring the applicant to store the vehicles and storage bins and materials inside the building or off the property. Mayor Worley opened the Public Hearing at 9:42 p.m. The following member of the audience spoke in opposition to Conditional Use Permit 96-33 (Pacific Auto Parts): Rutabegorz Restaurant owner, 158 W. Main The following members of the audience spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit 96-33 (Pacific Auto Parts): Lyn Van Dyken_, Tustin Robert Wehn, 18082 Lillian Way, Lisa Connor, Pacific Auto Parts Sara Barnett, Pacific Auto Parts Roger Thomas, 19801 Meadow Ridge Jim Foshlener, Tustin Tustin property owner #28, Trabuco Canyon Council/Speaker Connor/staff discussion followed regarding the methods used to move the tanks off the parking lot; cement wheel stops were required 2.5 feet from the wall; and security devices were installed on the tanks to prevent vehicle entry and theft. There were no other speakers on the subject and the Public Hearing was closed at 10:02 p.m. Mayor Worley stated that the tanks parked in the downtown area made Old Town eclectic and charming; the tanks were maintained in good condition; and she supported outside storage of the military vehicles. Councilmember Saltarelli stated that the military vehicles had become a personal matter with some members of the community; noted safety concerns regarding military vehicles driving through the small streets in Old Town; remarkedonthe public support for keeping the tanks in Old Town; stated he would support the tanks remaining parked in downtown; cautioned the owners and landlord about the risk if driving the vehicles in town; and announced that if the past community dispute arises again, this matter would be agendized for Council review. Council concurred to adopt the following Resolution No. 97-12 upholding the Planning Commission's action approving Conditional Use Permit 96-033: RESOLUTION NO. 97-12 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-033, AUTHORIZING THREE MILITARY VEHICLES AND TWO METAL STORAGE CONTAINERS TO BE LOCATED _ OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AT 125 WEST MAIN STREET Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent. 610-40 CONSENT CALENDAR (ITEMS 6 THROUGH 10) It was moved by Thomas seconded by Doyle, to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended by staff. Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent. 6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 3, 1997 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of February 3, 1997. 7. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $1,324,949.33 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 2-18-97 rr• ORDINANCE NO. 1178 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 3412 AND 3415 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE REGARDING THE LICENSING AND OPERATION OF TAXICAB SERVICES 12. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1175 - CONFIRMING VOTERS' WISHES TO LIMIT CITY COUNCIL TERMS It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1175: ORDINANCE NO. 1175 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE VOTERS' WISHES EXPRESSED ON NOVEMBER 8, 1994, TO LIMIT CONSECUTIVE TERMS OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 420-05 13. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1176 - AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1176: ORDINANCE NO. 1176 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 400-75 14. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1177 - AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION CODE It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1177: ORDINANCE NO. 1177 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 9, CHAPTER 3, SUBDIVISIONS, OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 460-50 and ratify Payroll in the amount of $346,866.56. 380-10 8. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - FEBRUARY 10, 1997 360-82 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of February 10, 1997. 120-50 9. PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 3075-3097 EDINGER AVENUE (COMMUTER RAIL STATION) Recommendation: Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement between AB REO IV, L.L.C. and the City of Tustin for a Commuter Rail Station, subject to minor modifications as may be required and approved by the City Attorney as recommended by the Assistant City Manager. 400-10 10. STATUS REPORT: HERITAGE WAY PARK AND CEDAR GROVE PARK Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Services Department. 920-05 REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEMS 11 THROUGH 14 ) 11. INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1178, CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE/ALCOHOL TESTING FOR TAXICAB SERVICE PROVIDERS It was moved by Thomas seconded by Doyle, to have first reading by title only and introduction of Ordinance No. 1178. Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent. 690-70 The City Clerk read the following Ordinance No. 1178 by title only: rr• ORDINANCE NO. 1178 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 3412 AND 3415 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE REGARDING THE LICENSING AND OPERATION OF TAXICAB SERVICES 12. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1175 - CONFIRMING VOTERS' WISHES TO LIMIT CITY COUNCIL TERMS It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1175: ORDINANCE NO. 1175 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE VOTERS' WISHES EXPRESSED ON NOVEMBER 8, 1994, TO LIMIT CONSECUTIVE TERMS OF MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 420-05 13. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1176 - AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1176: ORDINANCE NO. 1176 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 400-75 14. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 1177 - AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION CODE It was moved by Thomas, seconded by Doyle, to adopt the following Ordinance No. 1177: ORDINANCE NO. 1177 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 9, CHAPTER 3, SUBDIVISIONS, OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE Motion carried 4-0, Potts absent (roll call vote) 460-50 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 2-18-97 PUBLIC INPUT - None OTHER BUSINESS/COMMITTEE REPORTS ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY Councilmember Doyle expressed opposition to the Orange County Fire Authority assuming responsibility for ambulance services; and he believed the recruitment for Fire Chief Holmes' replacement should be at the local level. Councilmember Saltarelli explained that the Fire Authority wanted responsibility for ambulance services because they could provide a shorter response time; and he approved of a national recruitment for Chief Holmes' replacement. COUNCIL DEBATE - PUBLIC HEARINGS Councilmember Saltarelli commended his fellow Councilmembers for a thorough debate on the Public Hearing issues. ORANGE COUNTY BIG BROTHERS AND SISTERS Mayor Worley commended Orange County Big Brothers and Sisters, reported her son was an eager participant, and encouraged men to volunteer to fill a severe shortage of Big Brothers. - CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT Mayor Worley adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m. The next regular meeting of the City Council was scheduled for Monday, March 3, 1997, at 7:00 p.m. — in the Council Chambers at 300 Centennial Way. -J"L,�V7 Vv TRACY WIL S WORLEY, MAYOR PAMELA STOKER, CITY CLERK