Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 REINSTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT W/ SUCCESSOR AGENCYAGENDA REPORT s� MEETING DATE: JANUARY 21, 2014 Agenda Item n Reviewed: City Manager -e finance Director TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM: SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: AMEND AND REINSTATE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SUMMARY: In accordance with Health and Safety Code ( "HSC ") Section 34191.4(b), the City of Tustin ( "City ") and the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency ( "Successor Agency") are seeking to amend and reinstate the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement ( "Reimbursement Agreement ") entered into on June 5, 2007. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 14 -07, amending and reinstating the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Tustin and the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency and authorize the Mayor to execute the Third Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement. 2. It is recommended the City Council, acting the Successor Agency, adopt Successor Agency Resolution No. 14 -02, amending and reinstating the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Tustin and the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency and authorize the Agency Chair to execute the Third Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: The Reimbursement Agreement currently has a balance of $16,393,177 due to the City from the Successor Agency. Upon approval by the State of California Department of Finance ( "DoF "), the Successor Agency will include the Reimbursement Agreement on the next Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ( "ROPS "), allowing the Orange County Auditor - Controller to issue Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds ( "Trust Funds ") for payment. The interest rate in the Reimbursement Agreement has been 976742.1 , Agenda Report January 14, 2014 Page 2 amended to comply with HSC Section 34191.4(b)(2) and the payment schedule will reflect the revised interest rate. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Amending the Reimbursement Agreement addresses Goal C — Financial Strength, sustaining long -term financial strength with adequate reserves and enhanced capacity to provide a sustainable level of City Services. BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2007, the Tustin City /Council and Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency approved and authorized the execution of a "Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Tustin and the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency Related to Affordable Housing Responsibilities To Be Assumed by the Agency on June 5, 2007' (the "Original Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement") to assist the Agency in carrying out its affordable housing obligations under the MCAS Tustin Redevelopment Plan. On January 10, 2010, and February 1, 2011, the City Council and Agency approved and authorized the execution of the First and Second Amendments to the Reimbursement Agreement. The Reimbursement Agreement required the Agency to reimburse the City for the 118 affordable housing units produced on property originally owned by the City and sold to John Laing Homes at a discount. The affordable housing units are located at Tustin Fields I & II and are comprised of 33 Very Low - Income, 23 Low - Income, and 62 Moderate - Income units, which are secured by promissory notes and deeds of trusts by the City that reflect a total promissory note value associated with production of the affordable housing units of $46,407,736. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2007/2008, the Agency began to make annual payments. On June 29, 2011, Assembly Bill X1 26 became effective, causing the dissolution and wind down of all redevelopment agencies ( "Dissolution Act "). All redevelopment agencies in California were dissolved as of and on February 1, 2012, and the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency became responsible for winding down redevelopment activities in the City of Tustin. In compliance with Health and Safety Code ( "HSC ") Section 34177, the Successor Agency submitted a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ( "ROPS ") on March 15, 2012 to the State of California Department of Finance ( "DoF ") for approval. The ROPS included a request for Trust Funds to reimburse the City in accordance with the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement. On March 29, 2012, DoF denied the City's request for payment, stating it was not an enforceable obligation. On April 10, 2012, the City protested DoF's denial but did not have any other recourse under the existing statute at that time. 976742.1 Agenda Report January 21, 2014 Page 3 On August 29, 2012, the Successor Agency submitted the Third ROPS to DoF, which included the Reimbursement Agreement payment request. On October 13, 2012, DoF again denied the item, continuing with their stance that it was not an enforceable obligation. Since there was an opportunity to reinstate the Agreement through a Finding of Completion ( "Finding ") provision in the statute, the Successor Agency chose not to request a "Meet and Confer" with DoF on this matter. On May 10, 2013, the Successor Agency remitted what it believed to be its last remaining unencumbered funds to the Orange County Auditor - Controller and on May 13, 2013, requested a Finding from DoF. On July 3, 2013, DoF informed the Successor Agency that a Finding would not be issued until after the Successor Agency remitted the principal and interest due on December 1, 2013 for the December 31, 2008 Promissory Note between the City and Successor Agency. DoF's failure to issue the required finding of completion is contrary to the requirements under HSC Section 34179.7, including their failure to provide a response within five business days of the Agency's May 13th request. In response, the City, the Successor Agency and the Tustin Housing Authority have filed a "Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief' from the Superior Court of the State of California. Included in the Petition is a request for the Court to recognize the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement as an enforceable obligation. In anticipation of the upcoming March court hearing and in consultation with the City's attorneys, Staff believes it is prudent to amend and reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement prior to the Judge hearing our case. In compliance with HSC Section 34191.4(b)(2), the amended Reimbursement Agreement provides a payment schedule at the Local Agency Investment Fund interest rate. Upon City Council and Successor Agency approval, the Third Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement will be submitted to the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency on January 28, 2014 for their consideration. Should the Oversight Board approve the amended Reimbursement Agreement as an enforceable obligation, it will be submitted to DoF for final approval. Staff will be available to respond to any questions the City Council may have. Pamela Are ds -King Jerry Craig Finance Director Economic I Finance Department Successoop Rede elod Attachment: 1. City Council Resolution No. 14 -07 2. Successor Agency Resolution No. 14 -02 rimer .tom Housing Manager ncy to the Tustin Community Agency 976742.1 RESOLUTION NO. 14 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND REINSTATING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ") is a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq. ( "CRL ") and has been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City of Tustin ( "City "); and B. The City of Tustin is a municipal corporation of the State of California ( "City "); and C. Assembly Bill X1 26 added Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code, which laws cause the dissolution and wind down of all redevelopment agencies ( "Dissolution Act "); and D. On December 29, 2011, in the petition California Redevelopment Association, et al v. Ana Matosantos, et al ( "Matosantos Decision "), the California Supreme Court upheld the Dissolution Act and thereby all redevelopment agencies in California were dissolved as of and on February 1, 2012 under the dates in the Dissolution Act that were reformed and extended thereby ( "Supreme Court Decision "); and E. The Agency is now a dissolved community redevelopment agency pursuant to the Dissolution Act; and F. On June 5, 2007, the Tustin City Council and Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency approved and authorized the execution of a "Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Tustin and the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency Related to Affordable Housing Responsibilities To Be Assumed by the Agency on June 5, 2007' (the "Original Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement') to assist the Agency in carrying out its affordable housing obligations under the MCAS Tustin Redevelopment Plan; and Resolution No. 14 -07 976743.1 G. On January 10, 2010, and February 1, 2011, the City Council and Agency approved and authorized the execution of the First and Second Amendments to the Reimbursement Agreement.; and H. The Reimbursement Agreement required the Agency to reimburse the City in the amount of $46,407,736 for 118 affordable housing units produced on property originally owned by the City and sold to John Laing Homes at a discount; and I. In accordance with the Dissolution Act, the Successor Agency has submitted the Reimbursement Agreement on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for approval by the State of California Department of Finance ( "DoF "); and J. DoF has denied the Reimbursement Agreement, stating that it is not an enforceable obligation and indicated the Successor Agency could seek to reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement upon receiving a Finding of Completion ( "Finding "); and K. On May 10, 2013, the Successor Agency remitted what it believed to be its last remaining unencumbered funds to the Orange County Auditor - Controller and on May 13, 2013, requested a Finding from DoF; and L. On July 3, 2013, DoF informed the Successor Agency that a Finding would not be issued until after the Successor Agency remitted the principal and interest due on December 1, 2013 for the December 31, 2008 Promissory Note between the City and Successor Agency. M. In response, the City, the Successor Agency and the Tustin Housing Authority have filed a "Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and. Injunctive Relief" from the Superior Court of the State of California; and - N. The City has determined it is necessary and appropriate to amend and reinstate - the Reimbursement Agreement originally entered into by and between the City of Tustin and the former Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency on June 5, - 2007 as an enforceable obligation; and O. In accordance with the Dissolution Act, the amended and reinstated Reimbursement Agreement will also require the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency to deem it an enforceable obligation and State of California Department of Finance approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference, and constitute a material part of this Resolution. Resolution No. 14 -07 Page 2 of 4 976743.1 Section 2. The City Council approves amending and reinstating the June 5, 2007 Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Tustin and the former Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency. Section 3. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to execute the Third Amendment to the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement, in substantially the form attached to Resolution 14 -07. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the 21 st day of January, 2014. ELWYN A. MURRAY, Mayor ATTEST: JEFFREY C. PARKER, City Clerk Resolution No. 14 -07 976743.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Jeffrey C. Parker, City Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 14 -06 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 21St day of January, 2014, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: JEFFREY C. PARKER, City Clerk Attachment: Third Amendment to the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement Resolution No. 14 -07 Page 4 of 4 976743.1 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 14 -02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AMENDING AND REINSTATING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The City of Tustin, acting as the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ") was a community redevelopment agency organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq. ( "CRL ") and had been authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City of Tustin ( "City "); and B. Assembly Bill X1 26 added Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code, which laws cause the dissolution and wind down of all redevelopment agencies ( "Dissolution Act "); and C. On December 29, 2011, in the petition California Redevelopment Association, et al v. Ana Matosantos, et al, the California Supreme Court upheld the Dissolution Act and, thereby, all redevelopment agencies in California are subject of the Dissolution Act and were dissolved as of and on February 1, 2012; and D. The Agency is now a dissolved community redevelopment agency pursuant to the Dissolution Act; and E. By a resolution considered and approved by the City Council at an open public meeting on January 17, 2012, the City chose to become and serve as the "Successor Agency" to the dissolved Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency under the Dissolution Act; and F. As of and on and after February 1, 2012, the City serves as the "Successor Agency" and will perform its functions as the successor agency under the Dissolution Act to administer the enforceable obligations of the Agency and otherwise unwind the Agency's affairs, all subject to the review and approval by a seven member Oversight Board formed thereunder; and S.A. Resolution No. 14 -02 Page 1 of 4 976744.1 G. On June 5, 2007, the Tustin City Council and Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency approved and authorized the execution of a "Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Tustin and the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency Related to Affordable Housing Responsibilities To Be Assumed by the Agency on June 5, 2007' (the "Original Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement') to assist the Agency in carrying out its affordable housing obligations under the MCAS Tustin Redevelopment Plan; and H. On January 10, 2010, and February 1, 2011, the City Council and Agency approved and authorized the execution of the First and Second Amendments to the Reimbursement Agreement.; and I. The Reimbursement Agreement required the Agency to reimburse the City in the amount of $46,407,736 for 118 affordable housing units produced on property originally owned by the City and sold to John Laing Homes at a discount; and J. In accordance with the Dissolution Act and in order to receive Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds, the Successor Agency submitted the Reimbursement Agreement on the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for approval by the State of California Department of Finance ( "DoF "); and K. DoF denied the Reimbursement Agreement, stating it is not an enforceable obligation and indicated the Successor Agency could seek to reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement upon receiving a Finding of Completion ( "Finding "); and L. On May 10, 2013, the Successor Agency remitted what it believed to be its last remaining unencumbered funds to the Orange County Auditor - Controller and on May 13, 2013, requested a Finding from DoF; and M. On July 3, 2013, DoF informed the Successor Agency that a Finding would not be issued until after the Successor Agency remitted the principal and interest due on December 1, 2013 for the December 31, 2008 Promissory Note between the City and Successor Agency. N. In response, the City, the Successor Agency and the Tustin Housing Authority have filed a "Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief' from the Superior Court of the State of California; and O. The City, acting as Successor Agency, has determined it is necessary and appropriate to amend and reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement originally entered into by and between the City of Tustin and the former Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency on June 5, 2007 as an enforceable obligation; and P. In accordance with the Dissolution Act, the amended and reinstated Reimbursement Agreement will also require the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the S. A. Resolution No. 14 -02 Page 2 of 4 976744.1 Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency to deem it an enforceable obligation and DoF approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL SERVING AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this Resolution by this reference, and constitute a material part of this Resolution. Section 2. The City acting as Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency approves amending and reinstating the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Tustin and the former Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency. Section 3. The Agency Chair is hereby authorized to execute the Third Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement, in substantially the form attached to this Resolution. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption, and the City Clerk on behalf of the Successor Agency shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21 st day of January, 2014. ELWYN A. MURRAY, Chair on behalf of Successor Agency ATTEST: JEFFREY C. PARKER, City Clerk on behalf of the Successor Agency S.A. Resolution No. 14 -02 Page 3 of 4 976744.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, JEFFREY C. PARKER, City Clerk of the City of Tustin, acting as the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, hereby certify that the above and foregoing Successor Agency Resolution No. 14 -02 was duly adopted by the City of Tustin, acting as the Successor Agency to the LTustin Community Redevelopment Agency, at its regular meeting held on the 21 st day of January 21, 2014, and that it was so adopted by the following vote: AGENCYMEMBER AYES: AGENCYMEMBER NOES: AGENCYMEMBER ABSTAINED: AGENCYMEMBER ABSENT: Jeffrey C. Parker, City Clerk on behalf of Successor Agency Attachment: Third Amendment to the Affordable Housing Reimbursement Agreement S. A. Resolution No. 14 -02 Page 4 of 4 976744.1 ATTACHMENT THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT [Attached] 976744.1 THIRD AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RELATED TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESPONSIBILITIES ASSUMED BY THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY) This THIRD AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (City of Tustin and the Successor Agency to the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency Related to Affordable Housing Responsibilities Assumed by the Successor Agency) ( "Third Amendment") is entered into as of this 21s' day of January, 2014 ( "Effective Date ") by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal corporation ( "City "), and the SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate and politic ( "Successor Agency "). RECITALS A. The City has previously acquired from the Department of the Navy certain real property within the Marine Corps Air Station- Tustin Redevelopment Project Area ( "MCAS Project ") for resale to developers for the development of residential uses including a specified number of affordable housing units pursuant to the MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan/Specific Plan and the MCAS Project Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan was developed in accordance with California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et seq. ( "CRL "). B. On June 5, 2007 the City and the former Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency ( "former Agency ") entered into an agreement ( "Reimbursement Agreement") pursuant to which the former Agency agreed to reimburse the City from Tax Increment received by the former Agency from the MCAS Project, South Central Project, Town Center Project and other available former Agency resources, including funds deposited into the former Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for the development of one hundred eighteen (118) affordable housing units at Tustin Field I & II in the MCAS Project. C. The Reimbursement Agreement was entered into as a result of insufficient tax increment revenue in the MCAS Tustin Project Area being available to provide subsidies to developers at the levels that would permit the development of the affordable housing on an economically feasible basis due to the properties having been tax exempt as federal military land that generated no property taxes available to be expended to write -down or otherwise cause development of the land in conformity with the federal agreements being implemented as a part of base closure and reuse. In order to assist the former Agency in meeting its affordable housing obligations in the MCAS Tustin Project Area, the City of Tustin entered into an agreement to sell certain property ( "Property ") at a discount sufficient to permit developers to economically develop the required number of affordable housing units. D. To assist the former Agency in ensuring that such affordable housing units developed on such Property were and continue to be sold and remain available at affordable housing costs to, and occupied by, persons and families of very low to moderate income at a subsidized sale price for at least the forty -five (45) years for owner - occupied units prescribed by CRL Section 33334.3(f), and to provide for future ongoing monitoring requirements for such affordable units under CRL Section 33418, the City has encumbered such affordable housing units with covenants and deeds of trust that securitized the monetary investment and performance obligations of the trustor /homebuyer. The difference between the market value of each affordable unit and the affordable sale price of each and all affordable housing units is represented by the gap funding assistance provided to affordable homebuyers, each and all evidenced by promissory notes secured by second deeds of trust in favor of the City, hereinafter together referred to as the "Housing Affordability Subsidy ". E. The City's Housing Affordability Subsidy for the development of one hundred eighteen (118) affordable units at Tustin Field I & II is $46,407,736. F. On January 5, 2010, the City and former Agency entered into a First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement ( "First Amendment "). On February 1, 2011, the City and former Agency entered into a Second Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement ( "Second Amendment "). The Reimbursement Agreement, First Amendment, Second Amendment and this Third Amendment between the City and the Successor Agency shall also be collectively referred to as the Reimbursement Agreement. G. The former Agency was established as a community redevelopment agency that was previously organized and existing under the California Community Redevelopment Law and previously authorized to transact business and exercise the powers of a redevelopment agency pursuant to action of the City Council ( "City Council ") of the City. H. Assembly Bill xl 26 ( "AB xl 26 ") added Parts 1.8 and 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health & Safety Code and which laws were modified, in part, and determined constitutional by the California Supreme Court in the petition California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al., Case No. S194861 ( "Matosantos Decision "), which laws and court opinion caused the dissolution of all redevelopment agencies and winding down of the affairs of former redevelopment agencies; thereafter, such laws were amended further by Assembly Bill 1484 ( "AB 1484 ") and by Senate Bill 341 that affects affordable housing assets (together AB xl 26, the Matosantos Decision, AB 1484 and SB 341 are referred to as the "Dissolution Laws "), and all statutory references herein are to the Health and Safety Code of the Dissolution Laws unless otherwise stated. L As of February 1, 2012 the former Agency was dissolved pursuant to the Dissolution Laws and as a separate public entity, corporate and politic the Successor Agency administers the enforceable obligations of the former Agency and otherwise unwinds the former Agency's affairs, all subject to the review and approval by a seven - member oversight board ( "Oversight Board "). J. Section 34179 provides that the Oversight Board has fiduciary responsibilities to holders of enforceable obligations and the affected taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues pursuant to Section 34188 of Part 1.85 of the Dissolution Laws. K. In accordance with the Dissolution Laws and in order to receive Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds, the Successor Agency submitted the Reimbursement Agreement on one or more Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules for review and approval by the State of California Department of Finance ( "DoF "). L. DoF denied and continues to the deny the Reimbursement Agreement, stating it is not an enforceable obligation and indicated the Successor Agency could seek to reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement upon receiving a Finding of Completion ( "Finding "). Pa M. On May 10, 2013, the Successor Agency remitted what it believed to be its last remaining unencumbered funds to the Orange County Auditor - Controller and on May 13, 2013, requested a Finding from DoF. N. On July 3, 2013, DoF informed the Successor Agency that a Finding would not be issued until after the Successor Agency remitted the principal and interest due on December 1, 2013 for the December 31, 2008 Promissory Note between the City and Successor Agency, which note was not due at the time of the July 2012 "true -up" payment, nor at the time of the DoF's completion of the due diligence review reports. O. In response, the City, the Successor Agency and the Tustin Housing Authority, as housing successor under Section 34176 and 34176.1, have filed a "Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief' in the Superior Court, County of Sacramento, State of California ( "Petition "). P. While the Finding has been withheld from the Successor Agency under the Dissolution Laws, nonetheless as a part of the facts and information to be submitted to the Superior Court in connection with advancing the Petition, the City and the Successor Agency have determined it necessary and appropriate to amend and reinstate the Reimbursement Agreement originally entered into by and between the City of Tustin and the former Agency on June 5, 2007 as an enforceable obligation. Q. In accordance with the Dissolution Laws, the Reimbursement Agreement, as amended and reinstated, will also require the Oversight Board to review and deem it an enforceable obligation and then submit such action to the DoF for review and approval. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment of Paragraph 1. Paragraph 1 of the Reimbursement Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "The Successor Agency agrees to reimburse the City for the Affordable Housing Subsidy from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Funds transferred by the county auditor - controller into the Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund of the Successor Agency. The City and the Successor Agency agree that, as the date of the original Amendment, the amount of the Affordable Housing Subsidy was Forty -Six Million Four Hundred Seven Thousand and Seven Hundred and Thirty -Six Dollars ($46,407,736). As a result of a larger principal payment made in FY 2007 -2008 and the issuance of Tax Allocation Housing Bonds, net Twenty -Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($23,500,000), used to make a larger principal payment in FY 2009 -2010, the remaining balance to be repaid to the City is Sixteen Million Three Hundred Ninety -Three Thousand and One Hundred Seventy -Seven Dollars ($16,393,177)." 2. Amendment of Paragraph 5. Paragraph 5 of the Reimbursement Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "The obligations of the Successor Agency to make payments to the City required under this Agreement shall constitute a recognized obligation of the Successor Agency for the purpose of carrying out the closing out activities under the Dissolution Laws and are to be repaid to the City by the Successor Agency with interest at the interest rate earned by funds 3 deposited into the Local Agency Investment Fund, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.4(b)(2). The defined Debt Service Schedule is attached as EXHIBIT `A' and fully incorporated by this reference. The principal balance is updated to reflect all payments made since June 5, 2007, including the 2010 Housing Bond proceeds payment in FY 2009 - 2010." 3. Incorporation of Recitals. Each recital set forth in the Reimbursement Agreement and above in this Third Amendment shall be deemed to be part of the Reimbursement Agreement as amended by this Third Amendment. 4. Third Amendment. This Third Amendment constitutes a part of the Reimbursement Agreement and any reference to the Reimbursement Agreement shall be deemed to include a reference to such Reimbursement Agreement as amended hereby. 5. Full Force and Affect. Except as otherwise amended previously and herein, all terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of the Reimbursement Agreement shall remaining full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Successor Agency have executed the Third Amendment as of the Effective Date. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Jeffrey C. Parker APPROVED AS TO FORM: David E. Kendig, City Attorney C! CITY: CITY OF TUSTIN, a California municipal corporation By: Elwyn A. Murray, Mayor ATTEST: CITY CLERK TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY Jeffrey C. Parker APPROVED AS TO FORM: Celeste Brady Successor Agency Special Counsel SUCCESSOR AGENCY: SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public body corporate and politic Elwyn A. Murray, Chairman EXHIBIT `A' DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE (attached) 1 2 3 4 5 AFFORDABLE HOUSING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Original Principal 16,393,177 Interest (LAIF) 0.26% - Qtr end: Sept 2013 Original terms /year 5 Future FY Activity Fiscal Year Principal Interest Payment to City 2014 -2015 ($3,261,631) ($42,622) ($3,304,253) 2015 -2016 ($3,270,111) ($34,142) ($3,304,253) 2016 -2017 ($3,278,613) ($25,640) ($3,304,253) 2017 -2018 ($3,287,138) ($17,115) ($3,304,253) 2018 -2019 ($3,295,684) ($8,569) ($3,304,253) Total: ($16,393,177) ($128,088) 1 ($16,521,265) EXHIBIT 'A' Ending Principal After FY $13,131,545.94 $9,861,435.01 $6,582,821.79 $3,295,684.17 ($0.00)