HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 Design Review 2013-12 - AT&T Utility CabinetsAGENDA REPORT
US.�1
MEETING DATE: JANUARY 28, 2014
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 2013 -12
APPLICANT: AT &T CALIFORNIA
1265 N. VAN BUREN STREET, ROOM 180
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
PROPERTY
OWNERS: CITY OF TUSTIN (23 LOCATIONS)
VENTURANZA DEL VERDE HOA (ONE LOCATION)
LAURELWOOD HOA (ONE LOCATION)
LOCATION: CITYWIDE
ITEM # 5
REQUEST: A REQUEST TO INSTALL 25 ABOVEGROUND UTILITY
CABINETS IN, OR ADJACENT TO, THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF-
WAY IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT TUSTIN TO
HOUSE AND OPERATE LIGHTSPEED EQUIPMENT FOR U-
VERSE SERVICE.
ENVIRONMENTAL: AS CONDITIONED, THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY
EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 (CLASS 3) OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission may take one of the following options:
1. Should the Commission desire to approve all 25 proposed cabinets, as
conditioned:
• Adopt Resolution No. 4235 approving Design Review 2013 -12 to install and
operate 25 utility cabinets (combination of aboveground and flush- mounted
underground), located at various locations within or adjacent to the public
right -of -way;
2. Should the Commission desire to require that all 25 proposed cabinets be
underground and flush- mounted, as conditioned:
• Adopt Resolution No. 4235A approving the installation and operation of 25
flush- mounted underground utility cabinets, located at various locations within
or adjacent to the public right -of -way; or
3. Should the Commission desire to deny Design Review 2013 -12:
• Direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial with associated findings for
consideration by the Commission at the next regularly scheduled Planning
Commission meeting.
APPROVAL AUTHORITY:
Section 7262 of the Tustin City Code requires Design Review approval for new
aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment located on public property
and in the public right -of -way. Section 9272 of the Tustin City Code requires Design
Review approval prior to the issuance of any building permit for any new structure.
Although the Tustin City Code authorizes the Community Development Director to
consider the proposed project, this project has been deferred to the Planning Commission
for consideration.
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1213 and Design
Guidelines to regulate power supply equipment for telecommunication facilities within the
City's right -of -way. The 1999 Guidelines did not regulate utility facilities attached to utility
poles, street light poles, or other structures within the public right -of -way. In addition, the
1999 Guidelines did not address aboveground utility facilities located on public properties
such as parks, community facilities, or other City -owned properties.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 3
Current Ordinance and Guidelines
On November 19, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1232 and the Design
Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Properties and in the Public
Right -of -Way. Ordinance No. 1232 and the Design Guidelines were developed with
significant input from several utility providers, including AT &T. Ordinance No. 1232
establishes application requirements and designates the Community Development
Director as the reviewing authority.
In general, the 2001 Guidelines address facility location, screening, signs, accessory
equipment, required removal, undergrounding, and set forth a review process as follows:
• Location. Aboveground utility facilities should be placed in locations where there is
little or no interference with public use of the properties and the rights or reasonable
convenience of property owners who adjoin the properties.
• Stealth Facility. Except for street light poles being used solely for providing
illumination, all other aboveground utility facilities shall be designed as stealth
facilities with concealed antennas to be placed within, on, or attached to existing
structures such as buildings, utility poles, light poles, utility towers, freestanding
signs, score boards, towers, or fencing and shall blend into the surrounding
environment or be architecturally integrated into the existing structures.
• Co- location. Where possible, aboveground utility facilities shall be co- located with
existing utility facilities. The same is applicable for any existing utility facilities that
are located underground within the public right -of -way. Utility providers, with
permission to occupy the same structure or public right -of -way, shall co- locate their
utility facilities either aboveground or underground.
• Colors. Any part of a utility's facilities visible to public view shall have subdued
colors and non - reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and
colors and shall be covered with an anti - graffiti material, when appropriate.
• Screening. For building- or structure - mounted facilities, screening shall be
compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and /or materials of the
building or structure.
• Landscaping. When landscape screening is proposed or required, the landscaping
shall be compatible with the surrounding landscape area and shall be of a type and
variety capable of screening the utility facilities. All landscaping shall be adequately
maintained which includes, but is not limited to: trimming, mowing, weeding,
fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of diseased or dead plants.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 4
• Signs. Signs for utility facilities shall comply with the City of Tustin Sign Code.
• Accessory Equipment. Accessory equipment associated with the operation of the
utility facilities shall be designed, located, and made part of the structures (i.e. as
part of the base or support structure) or be located within buildings, enclosures, or
cabinets.
• Required Removal. The City, in accordance with the Lease Agreement of License,
Right -of -Way Agreement, or Encroachment Permit, as applicable, reserves the
right to require the removal or relocation of any aboveground utility facility when
determined to be necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by
giving ninety (90) days notice.
• Undergrounding. The City reserves the right to require that all utility facilities,
including their accessory equipment, be placed underground when technologically
feasible.
AT &T Lightspeed /U -verse
In 2005 and 2006, the City authorized 16 new or replacement AT &T utility cabinets
through the encroachment permit process. At that time, the cabinets were identified as
part of the repair and maintenance of existing systems. Upon discovery of the need to
install over 93 new cabinets citywide, the City required AT &T to submit a design review
application.
In 2007, AT &T California submitted an application for Design Review 07 -004 to install 16
aboveground utility cabinets in the public right -of -way as part of Phase One of a
comprehensive citywide master plan that identified a total of 93 locations. The application
was reviewed with respect to safety, lines of sight, Americans with Disabilities Act
compliance, environmental impacts, aesthetic impacts to the public right -of -way and
adjacent properties, and compliance with the requirements of the City's Design Guidelines
for Aboveground Utility Facilities. Design Review 07 -004 was denied by the Community
Development Director on April 5, 2007. Following the denial, AT &T and City staff met and
visited several sites for possible altemative locations and screening. However, AT &T did
not move forward with Project Lightspeed in Tustin.
Continuation of Design Review 2013 -12
The Planning Commission considered Design Review 2013 -12 at their meeting of
November 12, 2013, and continued the item to January 28, 2014, to provide the applicant
the opportunity to fully address items of Commission concern, including: providing
art/screening on the cabinets, the proposal's violation of the fundamental intent of
Ordinance No. 1232 and the Design Guidelines, the lack of desire or ability to co- locate U-
Verse and SAI cabinets, AT &T's inability to demonstrate the feasibility of undergrounding
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 5
the cabinets at each location, noise levels from the existing cabinets and the potential
impact of additional cabinets on quality of life, the effect of additional cabinets within the
community on the character of the community, safety concerns related to disabled access
in rights -of -way and sidewalks, and the need for a schedule of maintenance. The minutes
of the November 12, 2013, meeting are attached for reference (Attachment D).
In response, AT &T submitted a brief letter addressing some of the Commission's concerns
(Attachment E). As noted in the letter, AT &T is not willing to allow art on any of its
cabinets, nor place the cabinets underground. AT &T has not addressed all of the
Commission's concerns, and is requesting that the Commission only consider some of the
proposed locations at this time. Staff recommends that the Commission consider all of the
originally proposed 25 locations to avoid piecemealing (dividing a project into smaller
projects), which is specifically prohibited by the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) in Public Resources Code Section 21159.27 in qualifying for CEQA exemptions
(Attachment F).
DISCUSSION:
The applicant, AT &T California, has indicated that they would like to resume Project
Lightspeed in Tustin and is proposing to install up to 25 aboveground utility cabinets in,
or adjacent to, the public right -of -way in various locations throughout Tustin to house
and operate its Lightspeed equipment for its U -verse service. AT &T U -verse is a
subscription entertainment and communication program that integrates phone, internet,
and television services.
AT &T has indicated that the proposed U -verse cabinets for its Lightspeed project must
be within several thousand feet of residential customers and in close proximity to the
existing service area interface ( "SAI ") cabinets to use the existing copper distribution
network and maintain sufficient signal speed and quality. Each U -verse cabinet is able
to serve up to about 400 residences.
According to the Design Review Manual submitted by AT &T as part of their application,
there are three types of Lightspeed cabinets. Two of these cabinets are approximately
four feet tall, four feet wide, and two feet deep. The third cabinet is also about four feet
tall, but is about five feet wide and almost six feet deep. The larger cabinet is basically
a combination of two cabinets and is used when a larger cabinet is preferred over two
smaller cabinets in separate locations. AT &T is proposing the smaller cabinet depicted
in the center of the exhibit (Page 6).
In addition, the proposed application unilaterally states that undergrounding is not feasible.
AT &T asserts that even if the cabinets are placed underground within a controlled
environment vault ( "CEV" ), an access hatch of approximately four feet by three and a half
feet by six and half feet would be above ground, thereby defeating the primary purpose for
undergrounding the equipment. Although a general explanation for the inability to
underground the proposed cabinets was submitted, the alternatives for each location have
not been explored.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 6
.W..
AT &T Lightspeed Cabinets
It is unclear at this time whether AT &T plans to submit additional design review
applications for additional locations in the future. It should be noted again that 93 utility
cabinets were once identified as necessary to serve the City of Tustin, and now only up
to 25 cabinets are being proposed. These 25 cabinets could serve approximately
10,000 residences, which is only about one third of the total number of residences in the
City, and this does not take into account the business locations in the City. It is also not
known whether AT &T plans to use the existing SAI cabinets at all locations or replace
some of the existing SAI cabinets with larger SAI cabinets (see Attachment A — Design
Manual). According to AT &T, replacement may be necessary if the existing SAI is in
poor condition and /or unable to provide the necessary capacity for the new Lightspeed
service.
Photo - simulations of each of the proposed locations are included in Attachment A. (It
should be noted that no photo simulation was submitted for the location at 13742 Newport
Avenue, and that the aerial image submitted for 1432 Foresterra Lane does not depict the
correct location.) The majority of the locations (23 of 25) are within the public right -of -way
or within public parks. Two of the locations are adjacent to the public right -of -way within
landscape areas owned and maintained by homeowners associations. All except two of
the locations are directly adjacent to residences.
Staff has reviewed each of the 25 proposed utility cabinet locations and has categorized
the locations as follows:
1) Locations that comply with the City's Guidelines if conditions are imposed:
16502 Alliance Avenue
1402 Bryan Avenue (Pine Tree Park)
14492 Cherrywood Lane (HOA)
301 West First Street
1432 Foresterra Lane (behind)
13742 Newport Avenue
2850 -2870 Ballesteros Lane (behind)
14742 Carlax Avenue
1212 Drayton Avenue
560 West First Street
10751 Holderman Court (behind)
14552 Raintree Lane
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 7
14737 Red Hill Avenue 1831 Roanoke Avenue
1842 Roanoke Avenue (Centennial Park) 13332 Tiburon Way (behind)
13521 Yorba Street (opposite) 13712 Yorba Street
14662 Yorba Street
2) With suggested alternative locations, cabinet locations that comply with the City's
Guidelines if conditions are imposed:
• 13611 Red Hill Avenue (Option 2 acceptable)
• 15805 Myrtle Avenue (Option 1 acceptable)
3) Locations that do not comply with City Guidelines unless cabinets are
undergrounded (flush- mounted) or alternative locations are proposed:
• 1371 Kalua Lane
o The proposed location is along the street side of a private residential
property with one existing cabinet. The proposed location interferes with
the public use of the properties and the rights or reasonable convenience
of property owners who adjoin the properties in that the proposed cabinet
would be located directly in front of the side yard of a residence and
between two driveways.
o The proposed location appears to obstruct the line of sight for the adjacent
residential driveways.
1448 Valencia Avenue
o The proposed location is along the street front of a private residential
property with two existing cabinets. The proposed location interferes with
the public use of the properties and the rights or reasonable convenience
of property owners who adjoin the properties in that the proposed cabinet
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 8
would be located directly in front of a residence and where two existing
utility cabinets are located.
• Kensington Park Drive (vacant lot across from Fire Station No. 37)
o The proposed location is along the street front of a future shopping center.
The proposed location interferes with the public use of the properties and
the rights or reasonable convenience of property owners who adjoin the
properties in that the proposed cabinet may obstruct future egress /ingress
and /or signage for the future shopping center.
• 2906 Ballesteros Lane
o The proposed location is directly across the street from another proposed
location. It is unclear whether two cabinets are being requested in the
vicinity of Ballesteros Lane and Robinson Drive.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 9
o The proposed location is on private property owned and maintained by the
Venturanza Del Verde Homeowners Association (HOA). Their approval
will be required for this location.
o The proposed location is within a landscaped area that serves as a focal
entry point to the Venturanza Del Verde community.
Public Utilities Code
Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 7901, AT &T has the right to "construct lines . .
along and upon any public road or highway ... within the State." Nevertheless, AT &T
does not have unfettered right to place whatever facilities it wishes anywhere in the
public right of way. Indeed, Section 7901 also expressly provides that telephone
companies such as AT &T "may erect poles, posts, piers, or abutments for supporting
the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines in such manner and at
such points as not to incommode the ,public use of the road ... [Emphasis Addedl."
Further, Section 7901.1 of the Public Utilities Code expresses the Legislature's
reaffirmation of this long standing hierarchy of public purposes: "[M]unicipalities shall
have the right to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place, and manner in which
roads [and] highways ... are accessed [by public utilities]." Tustin City Code Section
7260 et seq. is the City's legislative method of implementing the City's obligation under
law to consider the time, place, and manner in which the City's streets and rights -of -way
may be accessed.
City staff is concerned with the number and method of placement of utility boxes in the
public right -of -way for several reasons, including: Safety, accessibility, proliferation,
visibility, clutter, and aesthetics. The following photographs of poorly placed or
designed utility boxes in two other Orange County communities demonstrate the
importance of the design review process.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 10
Utility Cabinets in Other Orange County Cities
DESIGN REVIEW
The pending action before the Planning Commission is a Design Review of a total of 25
proposed aboveground cabinet locations. Unlike some actions that are before the
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 11
Planning Commission, such as Conditional Use Permits, Use Determinations,
Variances, etc. the focus on the use of the land, the pending action is whether the
proposed improvement meets the design criteria and guidelines adopted by the City
Council. Generally, there are two provisions of the Tustin City Code that apply to
proposed action:
1) Design Review under Section 9272 of Tustin City Code, and
2) Design Review of Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Property and in the Public
Right of Way under Section 7260 and Resolution 01 -95: Design Guidelines for
Aboveground Utility Facilities and their Accessory Equipment.
Design Review (TCC 9272)
Within the provisions of Section 9272 et seq., to ensure that the location, size,
architectural features, and general appearance of proposed new developments and /or
structures will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, the occupancy thereof, or the community as a
whole, the City Council adopted a Design Review process and procedures. In
reviewing a proposed project, the Design Review requires that the following items be
considered:
1) Height, bulk, and area of proposed structure — The proposed aboveground utility
cabinets, each with a height of about four feet, a width of about four feet and a
depth of about two feet, are larger in size than, but similar in appearance to, other
utility cabinets in the public right -of -way in Tustin.
2) Setbacks and site planning — Of the 25 proposed locations, 21 are within the public
right -of -way, two are within homeowner association landscape areas, and two are
within public parks. Aboveground cabinets will be conditioned to not obstruct line of
sight requirements, obstruct or hinder the opening of vehicle doors or obstruct
disabled access.
3) Exterior material and colors — The proposed cabinets are constructed of metal and
each cabinet is conditioned to be of a color that blends with its surroundings.
4) Towers and antennae — No towers or antennae are proposed.
5) Landscaping and parking area design and traffic circulation —The proposed
cabinets within public parks and homeowners association landscape areas are
required to be screened with landscaping. Parking area design and traffic
circulation are not directly impacted.
6) Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure —
Four of the proposed cabinets are required to be undergounded. The remaining 21
cabinets are required through conditions of approval to be adequately screened or
of a color that blends with its surroundings.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 12
7) Physical relationship of proposed structure to existing structures — The proposed
cabinets would be located in close proximity to existing residences, fences, and
walls, but would not be located in front or a residence or adjacent to an open side
yard of a residence.
8) Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures
and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. The
proposed cabinets are required to be of a color that blends with adjacent landscape
features and structures and may be required in areas such as Old Town, to be
made available for public art in the future.
9) Development guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council — As
conditioned, the proposed cabinets comply with the City Council's adopted Design
Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities.
Design Review Pursuant to Aboveground Utility Facilities Guidelines
(TCC 7260 and Resolution 01 -95)
Section 7262 of the Tustin City Code requires approval of a Design Review for new
aboveground utility facility located on public property (Attachment B). The design criteria
for these types of facilities are outlined within City Council Resolution No 01 -95 (Design
Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities and their Accessory Equipment). The criteria
include items such as location, stealth facility, co- location, colors, screening, landscape,
signage, accessory equipment, removal of abandoned structures, and undergrounding.
The following provides an analysis of the proposed improvement in relationship to the
approved criteria.
1) Location — 18 of the 25 proposed locations are placed where there may be less
interference with public use of the properties or property owners who adjoin the
properties. Seven of the 25 proposed locations would significantly impact the use
of private property and the reasonable convenience of property owners by creating
safety hazards, impacting line of sight, creating visual clutter, and /or impeding
pedestrian access. However, optional locations were proposed at two of these
seven locations, such that these concerns have been minimized. For the remaining
five locations, conditions have been included in Resolution No. 4235 to require
undergrounding, an alternative location, or landscaping (primarily for the proposed
public park and homeowners association landscape locations).
2) Stealth Facility — The proposed cabinets are not stealth in design and the designs
are not intended to integrate with existing structures or blend with the surrounding
environment. Condition 2.12 of Resolution No. 4235 requires all cabinets to be of a
color that blends with adjacent surroundings. In some locations, landscaping is
required.
3) Co- location - The proposed cabinets are not integrated with existing cabinets and
no co- location alternative was submitted. When technologically feasible, co-
location requests shall be considered and a good faith effort shall be made to
accommodate the request.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 13
4) Colors — As conditioned, each cabinet will be required to be of a color that blends
with its surrounding environment.
5) Screening /Landscaping — No screening method or landscaping was proposed for
the cabinets. Pursuant to Condition No. 2.20 of Resolution No. 4235, landscaping
may be required at select locations.
6) Signage — Only signage related to certifications and warnings will be allowed on
each cabinet in accordance with proposed Condition No. 2.5 of Resolution No.
4235. No advertising would be permitted on the cabinets.
7) Accessory Equipment — The power pedestals are integrated with the proposed
cabinets.
8) Required Removal — Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines, the cabinet could be
required to be removed if necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
9) Undergrounding — Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines and as conditioned, the City
reserves the right to require that all utility facilities, including their accessory
equipment, be placed underground when technologically feasible. The proposed
application unilaterally states that undergrounding is not feasible. Although a
general explanation for the proposed cabinets was submitted, the alternatives for
each location have not been explored.
Undergrounding
Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines, the City reserves the right to require that all utility
facilities, including their accessory equipment, be placed underground when
technologically feasible. The submitted application materials state that undergrounding
is not feasible for various reasons (Attachment C). Although a general explanation for
this infeasibility was provided, the alternatives for each location have not been fully
explored, and AT &T has not provided credible evidence that the equipment is not able
to be placed underground and be flush- mounted. In addition, AT &T has commonly
placed other types of its communication equipment underground, including facilities in
Tustin as shown below.
Underground AT &T Facility in Tustin
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 14
According to the applicant, Lightspeed equipment that is placed underground must be
placed within a controlled environment vault (CEV). These vaults typically measure 16
feet by 10 feet by six feet and have an aboveground access hatch which extends about
four feet above ground level. The applicant has indicated that factors, including the
need for backup power, lighting, gas testing, ventilation, cooling, alarms, emergency
water pumping, and waterproofing limit the feasibility of placing the Lightspeed cabinets
in a flush to grade vault.
In accordance with the City's Guidelines, cabinets that cannot be effectively screened
should be located underground. To allow the proposed cabinets that are not effectively
screened to locate in the City's right -of -way would set a precedent such that other
providers would ignore the City's guidelines. Should the Commission require all of the
25 proposed cabinets to be placed underground, Resolution No. 4235A has been
provided for the Commission's consideration.
Public Art
In other communities, utility cabinets have been used as a "canvas" for public art.
These original art pieces contribute to the vitality and attractiveness of the communities,
while deterring graffiti. Although public art may not be desirable in all locations
throughout the City of Tustin, there may be locations in Old Town Tustin, or in some of
the City's planned communities or specific plan areas, where public art could positively
contribute to the aesthetic appearance of the cabinets and serve as a method of
screening, while also highlighting the heritage or image of the neighborhood.
Many California cities, including Berkeley, San Diego, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Ana
have implemented public art programs for utility boxes. Communities often manage
these programs through their arts commissions and invite local artists and students to
submit applications which are then reviewed based on criteria such as appropriateness
of scale, form, content, and the artist's experience and excellence. In Santa Ana, where
the program was recently launched, the initial pilot phase of the program will be focused
on Santa Ana's downtown, with a $700 stipend per utility box and up to $200 in
reimbursement for supplies to be paid for by the City.
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 15
Examples of Public Art
/radian Anima /s
[.LJa+�
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 16
Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines, the use of various screening techniques shall be
applied to screen equipment. Public art is one of the methods available to achieve a
stealth facility. The City of Tustin may consider adopting a public art program in the
future and may reserve the right to require public art on the proposed utility boxes by
requiring through Condition 2.14 of Resolution No. 4235 that AT &T make its proposed
utility cabinets available for public art purposes and provide the funding for the public
art. It should be noted that AT &T has unilaterally indicated that it would not
accommodate public art on its utility cabinets.
Survey of other Communities
City staff conducted a survey of Orange County cities and selected cities nationwide
regarding the implementation of AT &T's U -verse service in other communities.
Information was obtained from thirty (30) cities. Of the responding cities, one city
(Huntington Beach) requires utility equipment to be installed underground in certain
designated areas of the city, and the City of San Francisco requires utility equipment in its
historic neighborhoods to be installed underground, inside buildings, or in basements.
Public Noticing
A courtesy public meeting notice identifying the time, date, and location of the continued
public meeting for the proposal was mailed on January 17, 2014, to all owners of
property within 100 feet of each of the 25 proposed sites. A public meeting notice was
also posted at City Hall on January 20, 2014.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
With the conditions of approval in Resolution No. 4235, this project is categorically
exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303, Class 3. However, if potential impacts are not
minimized through the conditions of approval, the proposed project would require further
environmental review and may require the preparation of an Initial Study and Negative
Declaration or Environmental Impact Report.
ADDITIONAL FINDINGS:
In general, in determining whether to approve the Design Review for the proposed 25
aboveground utility cabinets, the Planning Commission must find that the location, size,
architectural features, and general appearance of the proposed aboveground utility
facilities will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present
or future development therein, or the community as a whole. The specific findings the
Planning Commission must make as required by the Tustin City Code and Resolution No.
01 -95 are included in Resolution No. 4235 in Attachment G and discussed above. A
decision to approve this request, as conditioned, may be supported by the following
additional findings:
PC Report
January 28, 2014
DR 2013 -12
Page 17
1) When located within residential areas, the proposed cabinets that are
aboveground are located adjacent to side or rear yards of residential properties
and along major streets, which minimizes potential aesthetic, access, and safety
impacts.
2) The proposed cabinet locations comply with Tustin City Code Section 7260 related
to Design Review of Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Property and in the
Public Right -of -Way and with City Council Resolution No. 01 -95 establishing
Design Review guidelines for aboveground utility facilities on public property and in
the public right -of -way.
3) The location, size, and general appearance of the proposed cabinets, as
conditioned, are compatible with the surrounding area in that the cabinets would
be underground, screened with landscaping, or of a color that blends with its
surroundings.
4) The proposed cabinets will provide coverage to areas that are currently deficient of
the AT &T U -verse service.
CONCLUSION:
Staff has presented three options for the Planning Commission's consideration. The
first option would approve Design Review 2013 -12 to install and operate 25
aboveground utility cabinets (Resolution No. 4235), the second option would require
that all 25 proposed utility cabinets be installed underground and be flush- mounted
(Resolution No. 4235A), and the third option would direct staff to prepare a resolution
denying Design Review 2013 -12. The findings for each option are or will be provided in
the respective resolutions for consideration.
ott Reekstin Elizabeth A. Binsack
Principal Planner Community Development Director
Attachments:
A. Submitted Plans — Photograph Simulations and Design Manual
B. Tustin City Code 7260 et al and Resolution No. 01 -95
C. Letter dated August 28, 2013
D. Planning Commission November 12, 2013, Meeting Minutes
E. Letter dated January 6, 2014
F. Public Resources Code Section 21159.27
G. Resolution Nos. 4235 and 4235 A
ATTACHMENT A
SUBMITTED PLANS - PHOTOGRAPH SIMULATIONS AND DESIGN
MANUAL
15701 Tustin Village Way (Williams Street and Alliance Way) - Tustin ( 16502- Alliance -Avenue-)
15701 Tustin Village Way (Williams Street and Alliance Way) - Tustin
15701 Tustin Village Way (Williams Street and Alliance Way) - Tustin
nnpc.: m.p.p„pi..e.,,,m.v�ai...aum. YMa�nirm.a.ewxon :r Rives .
sVY1Ballesteros Lane and Robinson Drive - Tustin (7-85o —Z137o 6,Llie54-aro5)
SVY 1 Ballesteros Lane and Robinson Drive - Tustin
2906 Ballesteros Lane and Robinson Dr - Tustin
2906 Ballesteros Lane and Robinson Dr - Tustin
1402 Bryan Ave (Lance Dr and Red Hill Ave) - Tustin
1402 Bryan Ave (Lance Dr and Red Hill Ave) - Tustin
0°� QLiInnX �Oea1�1rJ 4'aJe to � .. -�� '
1402 Bryan Ave (Lance Dr and Red Hill Ave) - Tustin
14742 Carfax Drive and Sycamore Ave - Tustin
14742 Carfax Drive and Sycamore Ave - Tustin
�Mnm1 ��m.nNMaM On u +.19i
24492 Cherrywood Lane and Walnut Ave — Tustin
14492 Cherrywood Lane and Walnut Ave — Tustin
c.e. Qwm.nl�,nmm ueenen � 'Ja: -
14492 Cherrywood Lane and Walnut Ave — Tustin
s
1212 Drayton Ave and Carfax Dr— Tustin
Goggle 1212@aytm An, Tmhn, CA
i 1 `i
� � [.
��:�
.. .}'�
f F I. �r,� � _
! i
�, �
� Y
�.I
'.i,
k
:�
i ..
215 West First Street and B Street - Tustin (3 O 1 We6f- fr i5,1-- 6-Free+0
215 West First Street and B Street - Tustin
215 West First Street and 8 Street - Tustin
SA
215 West First Street and B Street — Tustin
560 First Street and Pacific Street — Tustin
560 First Street and Pacific Street — Tustin
560 First Street and Pacific Street — Tustin
f
IWM'VRAD
x
560 First Street and Pacific Street — Tustin
10800 Pioneer Rd and Brand Dr- Tustin 610-75/ Ht, I er- m,gnzuurf�
10800 Pioneer Rd and Brand Dr— Tustin
1372 First Street and White Sand Dr - Tustin (13"11 IGa Lon z)
1372 First Street and White Sand Dr - Tustin
ca•. a�nT.ni.,n.n.auw.a ,,. +,isc .
1431 Walnut Ave andTenbyLane - Tustin (ly3Z ForesterrrL Lgne)
1431 Walnut Ave and Tenby Lane - Tustin
1431 Walnut Ave and Tenhy Lane - Tustin
J
1431 Walnut Ave and Tenby Lane — Tustin
S� i
SVY 1— West Connector (Valencia Ave and Kensington Park Dr) — Tustin CKcng� „� , pang �Vel
van. p W—. I on.nO N.Ca on 1- Rim: .
sVY 1— West Connector (Valencia Ave and Kensington Park Dr) — Tustin
SVY 1— West Connector (Valencia Ave and Kensington Park Dr) — Tustin
[me vun�rmlo�n.rc.arw�c. � •,tmt .
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave - Tustin
.I- ..". •.p Y , " ♦w'. . —., d.. c.*. .. WT11111i
LN 1,
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave -Tustin
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave - Tustin
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave - Tustin
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave - Tustin
15805 Myrtle Ave and McFadden Ave - Tustin
13742 Newport Ave and San Juan Street -Tustin
13742 Newport Ave and San Juan Street - Tustin
14552 Raintree Lane and WalnutAve - Tustin
14552 Raintree Lane and Walnut Ave - Tustin
Y �n.�,�nlwnm�ause. o. eJm: -
14552 Raintree Lane and Walnut Ave - Tustin
a
13611 Red Hill Ave and Lance Dr— Tustin
e r NA
-Od
:2 ago
u '
�'-
I
I �
I
A
I
:t.8% 04/
S`
13611 Red Hill Ave and Lance Dr— Tustin
�, a,,I
13611 Red Hill Ave and Lance Dr— Tustin
14737 Red Hill Ave and Sycamore Ave - Tustin
14737 Red Hill Ave and Sycamore Ave - Tustin
e = ^• - iw�alo�u.u.e.i.ka y • tuns
1831 Roanoke Ave and Oxford Ave - Tustin
1831 Roanoke Ave and Oxford Ave - Tustin
1842 Roanoke Ave and Oxford Ave - Tustin
1842 Roanoke Ave and Oxford Ave - Tustin
Y �w i r,m wwxa 4 .. ,=, .
13351 Parkcenter Lane and Maricopa — Tustin C 13332ri burcn G.)o
Go,)ole Pa :A :creJLamaam]r[oGa,Tcv:a. CA ® m
13351 Parkcenter Lane and Maricapa — Tustin
ce.. pw..mle�n.nwr.mf�o. . • ♦�mx .
SVY 1 — Valencia North Loop Rd (Valencia Ave and Columbus Square) — Tustin ( (qq$ (%(,IM64, Ave)
SVY 1— Valencia North Loop Rd (Valencia Ave and Columbus Square) — Tustin
13521 Yorba Street and Santa Clara Ave - Tustin
13521 Yorba Street and Santa Clara Ave - Tustin
13712 Yorba Street and Bonner Rd - Tustin
13712 Yorba Street and Bonner Rd - Tustin
13712 Yorba Street and Bonner Rd - Tustin
14662 Yorba Street and Amaganset Way - Tustin
Go,1gle 1Aff]YoM1La^rrct[L ' mCA o m
14662 Yorba Street and Amaganset Way— Tustin
14662 Yorba Street and Amaganset Way— Tustin
RECENED
SP- 5 2013
COMMUNITY OEVEWPNILNT
BY:
DESIGN REVIEW MANUAL
ATFtT CALIFORNIA
ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES
2013
at &t
Nue i of 22
"SAI"
(Serving Area Interface)
Puac 2 of 22
17
4220 E
Dimensions
WidtlJl leiphUDeplh
36 ;x19' „x18
Pegs 3 of 22
4220 F SERIES
i
i
4'
i
49 314'
17 v4'
Single -sided Cabinet
18^
r
—r— cs^
27^
Page 4 of 22
4220 G SERIES
i
I
49
Double -sided Cabinet
Page 5 of 22
1)
4220 -KIKF
a
Paac 6 of 22
4220 KIF SERIES
jw
In
69 3/4"
17'
1A"
Single-sided Cabinet
118"
45"
27'
Page 7 or 22
4220 K SERIES
043/4
17
Double -sided Cabinet
Page 8 of 22
4230 LF SERIES
® I ,
9
Single -sided Cabinet
1h^
Page 9 of 22
4230 L SERIES
Double -sided Cabinet
Pagc 10 of 22
LIGHTSPEED CABINETS
Pine 11 of 22
"recommended pad size shown
ALP -24BU W /POWER METER DETAIL
(48" LOW PROFILE)
Page 12 of 22
g �e:
rim
ALP -24BU W /POWER METER DETAIL
(48" LOW PROFILE)
Page 12 of 22
ALP -448 W /DETACHED POWER METER
6
Pape 13 of 22
ALP - 248 -LA Cabinet Dimensions
Cabinet: ALP - 248 -LA
External Dimensions
Height:
48 inches (1219 mm)
Width:
51.7 inches (1313 mm)
Depth:
26 inches (660 mm)
Page 14 of 22
VSEM
VSEM DIMENSIONS
38 IN. LONG BY 26 IN. WIDE BY 24 IN. HIGH
Pagc 15 of 22
32.3"
ALP -130NP
ALP- 1 3ONP
2°
PaP 16 or22
POWER PEDESTAL
Pagc 17 of 22
I
2 q_„ -I
Pagc 18 of22
PEDESTALS
Pa-e 19 or 22
CPLM 6, 8 and 10 pedestals: Note- the 6, 8, 10 references the
width. We are using the 8"
"MAX
Pugc 20 of 22
MULTI - PURPOSE HOUSING
Pagc 21 of 22
MULTI - PURPOSE HOUSING (CMPH)
33"
2t[&711
4T
Dimensions:
Overall (dome on):
Above ground:
Below ground:
48 "H x 27"W x 14.5'D
39 "H x 27M x 14.5'D
9 "H x 27"W x 14.5D
Pagc 22 of 22
ATTACHMENT B
TUSTIN CITY CODE 7260 ET AL AND RESOLUTION NO. 01 -95
Municode Page 1 of 3
Tustin, California, Code of Ordinances >> ARTICLE 7 - PUBLIC FACILITIES >> CHAPTER 2 -
HIGHWAYS >> PART 6 DESIGN REVIEW OF ABOVEGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES ON PUBL
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY >>
PART 6 DESIGN REVIEW OF ABOVEGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF-
WAY
7260 PURPOSE AND FINDINGS
7261 LEASE AGREEMENT REQUIRED
7262 DESIGN REVIEW REQUIRED
7263 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW
7264 DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
7265 APPEALS
7260 PURPOSE AND FINDINGS
The purpose of this Part 6 is to maintain a safe and aesthetically pleasing environment in the public right -of-
way and on City -owned properties by regulating the location, color, screening, and other aspects of aboveground
utility facilities.
Aboveground utility facilities come in a variety of forms that include, but are not limited to, cables, wires,
conduits, ducts, pedestals, and antennae to transmit, receive, distribute, provide, or offer utility services. Their
accessory equipment typically is contained in enclosures, cabinets, artificial rocks, or boxes to house a variety of
uses such as controls for signals, electronics, and wiring for cable television and telecommunications, or power
sources. Often these facilities are located aboveground an existing structures such as utility or light poles and have
the tendency to proliferate to ensure user coverage. Such proliferation can result in visual clutter, blocking visibility
to signs and other structures, preventing access for the disabled, distracting motorists travelling along the right -of-
way, and creating noise.
Reasonable regulations for locating the aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment are
necessary to promote the health and aesthetic welfare of the people of Tustin. Reasonable compensation for
permitting private use of public property and the public right -of -way is also necessary to offset the right -of -way
maintenance costs.
(Ord No. 1232, Sec. 2, 12 -3 -01)
7261 LEASE AGREEMENT REQUIRED
No person shall place, construct, install, own, control, operate, manage, maintain, or use any aboveground
utility facilities and their accessory equipment in, above, beneath, or across any public property, exclusive of the
public right -of -way, without first obtaining a Lease Agreement or License in accordance with the Design Guidelines.
Franchises and Right -of -Way Agreements for telecommunication facilities in the public right -of -way are governed
by State and Federal regulations and pertinent provisions of Chapter 7 of Article 7 of the Tustin City Code.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec, 2,12-3-01)
littp: /l library. municode .comlprint.aspx ?h = &clientlD = 11307 &HTMRequest= http°t%3 a %2f °le2flibrary.mu... 11/05/2013
Municode
7262 DESIGN REVIEW REQUIRED
Page 2 of 3
No person shall place, construct, install, own, control, operate, manage, maintain, or use any aboveground
utility facilities and their accessory equipment without compliance with the Design Review requirements in Tustin
City Code Section 9272 and with this Part 6. This requirement applies to existing and future franchisees and any
other person who wishes to locate replacement or new aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment
on public property and in the public right -of -way. Aboveground utility facilities located within Redevelopment Project
areas shall be consistent with the respective redevelopment plans. No Design Review approvals or any permits
can be issued unless the Redevelopment Agency can make a finding of conformity.
Existing aboveground utility facilities and accessory equipment installed prior to the effective date of this
ordinance shall not be subject to this requirement.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec, 2, 12 -3 -01)
7263 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW
An applicant shall submit a plan of the proposed location of all aboveground utility facilities including their
accessory equipment located in cabinets, enclosures, or boxes to the Director of Community Development
( "Director "). Information shall also be provided as to the dimensions, proposed colors, screening materials, noise
levels, and whether there will be interference with the public radio system anticipated. The applicant shall pay a fee
to cover the anticipated staff time to review and process the application as established by the City Council for a
Design Review application.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec. 2,12-3-01)
7264 DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
Upon the application being found complete by the Director, or designee, the Director or designee shall
review the plan (the "Plan ") using the criteria set forth in the Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities on
Public Properties and in the Public Right -of -way adopted by resolution of the City Council. If the utility facilities are
to be located within redevelopment areas, then a finding of conformity by the Redevelopment Agency would need
to be made prior to the Director's consideration of the Design Review. The Director may conditionally approve or
deny the application. Amendments to the Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director concurrent with or
prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit, Lease Agreement or License, as provided for in the Design
Guidelines, or Right -of -Way Agreement as defined in Chapter 7 of Article 7 of the Tustin City Code. The
aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment must be installed pursuant to the approved Plan. The
noise generated from the aboveground utility facilities, including their accessory equipment, shall comply with the
City's noise regulations.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec. 2, 12 -3.01)
7265 APPEALS
Any person may appeal any decision of the Director in accordance with Section 9294 of this Code.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec. 2, 12 -3 -01; Ord, No. 1366, Sec, 16, 11 -17 -09)
7266 TERM /ABANDONMENT
(a) An aboveground utility facility is considered abandoned if it no longer provides service. If the use of the
facility is discontinued for any reason, the operator shall notify the City of Tustin in writing no later than thirty
http://Iibrary.municode.com/ print. aspx? h= &clientID= 11307 &HTMRequest= httpo,%3 a %2N /o2flibrary.mu... 11/05/2013
Municode
Page 3 of 3
(30) days after the discontinuation of use. If no notification is provided to the City, the facility shall be
deemed discontinued.
(b) Aboveground utility facilities, including their accessory equipment, that are no longer being used shall be
removed promptly no later than ninety (90) days after the discontinuation of use. Such removal shall be in
accordance with proper health and safety requirements. All affected areas shall be restored to their original
condition at the operator's expense.
(c) The Design Review approval shall remain valid for the term of the Lease Agreement, License, Right -of -Way
Agreement, or as long as the Encroachment Permit is valid. If the Lease Agreement, License, Right -of -Way
Agreement, or Encroachment Permit is terminated, notice and evidence thereof shall be provided to the
Director. Upon termination or expiration of the Lease Agreement, License, Right -of -Way Agreement, or
Encroachment Permit, the aboveground utility facilities, including their accessory equipment, shall be
removed from the public property or the public right -of -way.
(Ord. No. 1232, Sec. 2, 12 -3.01)
http: / /library.municode.com/ print. aspx?l i= &clientlD= 11307 &HTMRequest= http%3 a%2P/o2flibrary.mu... 11/05/2013
RESOLUTION NO. 01 -95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 99 -84 BY ADOPTING DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR ABOVEGROUND UTILITY
FACILITIES AND THEIR ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY AND IN THE PUBLIC
RIGHT -OF -WAY.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That telephone, Internet, cable, and personal wireless telephone
(cellular) servicing the City are expanding and upgrading their
services and will require installation of additional equipment such as
aboveground accessory equipment, antennas attached to utility
poles, street light poles, or other structures on public properties or in
the public right -of -way.
B. On December 6, 1999, the City Council adopted the Aboveground
Cabinets Design Guidelines. These guidelines regulate
aboveground cabinets for power supply equipment within the public
right -of -way. These guidelines do not regulate utility facilities
located aboveground such as antennas attached to utility poles,
street light poles, utility towers, or other structures within the public
right -of -way.
C. Currently, there are no guidelines in place for aboveground utility
facilities on public properties such as parks, community facilities, or
othetlCity -owned properties. New comprehensive guidelines are
needed to establish design criteria prior to installation of
aboveground utility facilities on public properties or in the public
right -of -way.
D. That guidelines and development standards are needed to promote
and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare and
preserve and enhance the quality of the City relating to the orderly
development of aboveground utility facilities and their accessory
equipment.
E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held by the
Planning Commission on September 10, 2001, and the Planning
Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 2
Commission recommended approval of the Design Guidelines for
Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Properties and in the Public
Right -of -Way and Ordinance No. 1232,
F. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held by the City
Council on October 1, 2001, and continued to October 15, 2001,
November 5, 2001, and November 19, 2001.
II. In adopting the Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public
Property and in the Public Right -of -Way, the City Council finds and
determines: °
A. That the guidelines provide standards that mitigate impacts typically
associated with installation of aboveground utility facilities and their
accessory equipment on public property and in the public right -of-
way, including measures to reduce their visual impact.
B. That due to the potential for over- concentration and proliferation of
aboveground utility facilities, particularly in residential neighborhoods
where these facilities are highly visible and thus may impact the
visual character of the neighborhood, the criteria established in the
guidelines are necessary to promote the welfare of the community.
C. That the guidelines require approval of an Encroachment Permit
and /or Design Review process which would ensure that
aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment are
developed in an orderly manner with respect to location, size, and
screening.
D. Traffic signal controller cabinets are exempted because they are
different in nature and function and provide essential services. The
traffic signal control cabinets by nature must be located where
traffic can be controlled at intersections. Irrigation controller
cabinets are also exempted because they must be located in close
proximity to available power sources.
E. That street light poles being used solely to provide illumination are
exempted because the nature of the service they provide must be
located aboveground and that they provide essential services for
the safety of motorists and pedestrians.
F. That fair and reasonable compensation shall be secured for
permitting private use of public properties by utility providers.
Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 3
G. That it is appropriate for the City Manager, on behalf of the City
Council, to accept discretionary applications for use of public
properties and /or public right -of -way.
N. That the Director of Community Development should be authorized to
approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Design Review
application in accordance with the Design Guidelines adopted herein.
For projects located within redevelopment project areas, the
Redevelopment Agency shall make a finding of conformity to the
respective redevelopment plans concurrently or prior to consideration
of the Design Review application. No Design Review approvals shall
be granted without a finding of conformity by the Redevelopment
Agency.
i. A Final Negative Declaration has been prepared and adopted in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
III. The City Council hereby amends Resolution No. 99 -84 by adopting the
Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Properties and
in the Public Right -of -Way attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to be followed
when considering an Encroachment Permit and /or Design Review
application for the installation of aboveground utility facilities and their
accessory equipment on public properties and in the public right -of -way.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the
19`h day of November, 2001.
Tracy Wil orley
Mayor
Pamela Stoker
City Clerk
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public
Properties and in the Public Right -of -way
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR
ABOVEGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES
ON PUBLIC PROPERTIES AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY
SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND INTENT
The purpose of these guidelines is to implement Part 6 of Chapter 2 of Article 7 of the
Tustin City Code (Ordinance No. 1232) and regulate the placement and design of
aboveground utility facilities and their accessory equipment in conjunction with any City -
permitted use of public properties and public right -of -ways.
These guidelines are intended to protect the health, safety, aesthetics, and welfare; and
secure fair and reasonable compensation for permitting private use of public property.
SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS
For purposes of these guidelines, the following words and phrases shall have the following
meanings, unless the context of the sentence in which they are used indicates otherwise.
"Aboveground Accessory Equipment" or "Accessory Equipment" means any aboveground
equipment located in enclosures, cabinets, artificial rocks, boxes, or other structures to
facilitate the operation of their associated utility facilities.
"Aboveground Utility Facility" or "Utility Facilities" means any aboveground public or private
plant, equipment, and property including, but not limited to, cables, wires, conduits, ducts,
pedestals, antennae, utility poles, street-ttght- pales; utility towers, or other structures and
their supports, electronics, and other appurtenances used or to be used to transmit,
receive, distribute, provide, or offer utility services. This does not include street light poles
being used solely for providing illumination, but This - Includes facilities fef such as personal
wireless services as defined in the Telecommunication Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7).
"City" means the City of Tustin.
"Council" means the City Council of the City of Tustin.
"Co- location" means the locating of more than one aboveground utility facility provider on a
single structure - mounted, roof - mounted, or ground- mounted utility facility.
"Director" means the Community Development Director of the City of Tustin.
"Grantee" means a person who has been granted a Lease Agreement or License pursuant
to this policy and guidelines.
"Interference" means any instances of Interference with public safety radio equipment
preventing clear radio reception which includes, but is not limited to, static, unwanted
signal, and distortion of sounds or reception.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 2
"Lease Agreement or License" means a contract agreement between the City and a
person pursuant to this policy and guidelines. The contract may be in the form of a
lease if the City owns a fee interest in the property or in the form of a license if the City
has a leasehold interest in the property.
"Modification" means an alteration of an existing utility facility that changes its size,
location, shape, or color. This is not intended to include replacement of a facility with an
Identical facility or the repair of the facility.
"Person" means and includes, but is not limited to, corporations, companies or
associations, firms, partnerships, limited liability companies, and individuals and includes
their lessors, trustees, receivers, and successors in interest.
"Public property means any property in which the City of Tustin and /or the City's
Redevelopment Agency holds a legal interest, except the public right -of -way.
"Public right -of -way" means and includes all public streets, sidewalks, and utility
easements now or hereafter owned in fee or easement by the City.
"Public Works Director" means the Director of Public Works of the City.
"Right -of -way Agreement" means a contract granted to a person pursuant to Chapter 7 of
Article 7 of the Tustin City Code as follows: (1) a license in the case of a
telecommunications provider that will not serve areas or persons within the City, or (2) a
franchise in the case of a telecommunications provider that will serve areas or persons
within the City, as it may be amended.
"Stealth Facility" means any aboveground utility facility which is disguised to appear as
another natural or artificial man -made objects such as trees, clock towers, score boards,
etc. that are prevalent in the surrounding environment or which are architecturally
integrated into buildings or other concealing structures.
"Utility Provider" means and Includes any person that proposes to or does own, control,
operate, or manage plant, equipment, or any other facility on public property or in the
public right -of -way for the provision of an utility service.
"Utility Service" means and includes any electrical, gas, heat, water, telephone, pipeline,
sewer, or telegraph services or commodity, where the service is performed for, or the
commodity delivered to, the public or any portion thereof.
SECTION 3: APPLICABILITY
These guidelines regulate the installation of new and replacement aboveground utility
facilities and their accessory equipment on public properties or in the public right -of-
way.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 3
SECTION 4: PROCESS
4.1 Application Process
The City Manager or designee may accept a discretionary application for use of
public property and /or public right -of -way for aboveground utility facilities and
process the application in accordance with Tustin City Code Section 9272 related
to the Design Review process. At the City Managers sole discretion, a request
to submit an application may be denied. Authorization to submit an application
does not commit the City to approve the proposed use.
Upon the application being found complete by the Community Development
Director ( "Director') or designee, using the criteria set forth in these guidelines
and Tustin City Code Section 9272, the Director may approve, conditionally
approve, or deny the application. The Director reserves the right to, or if required
will, forward any application to the Planning Commission and /or City Council for
consideration and action.
For projects located within redevelopment project areas, a finding of conformity
to the respective redevelopment plans shall be made concurrently or prior to
consideration of the Design Review application. No approvals shall be granted
unless the Redevelopment Agency can make a finding of conformity.
Upon the approval of the application, the Grantee shall obtain all applicable
permits prior to installation of the aboveground utility facilities and their accessory
equipment including, but not limited to, Lease, License, Right -of -Way Agreement
under Chapter 7 of Article 7 of the Tustin City Code, electrical permit, building
permit, Encroachment Permit, owner authorization, and other required permits by
the City or any other agencies such as Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
Federal Communication Commission (FCC), Public Utility Commission (PUC), or
other County, State or Federal agencies. However, existing franchises or
agreements need not be reconsidered by the City Council unless the franchise
agreement requires such consideration.
4.2 Design Review
a. Design Review approval in accordance with Tustin City Code Section
9272, shall be required prior to the placement, construction, installation,
operation, establishment, or modification of any aboveground utility
facilities on public property and in the public right -of -way.
b. A Design Review application shall be accompanied with a statement to
indicate that the utility facilities will not interfere with the public safety radio
equipment. if interference occurs after the installation, the utility providers
shall take immediate action to eliminate the interference and pay all
associated fees for compliance.
C. Design Review approval shall remain valid for the term of the Lease
Agreement or License and /or Right -of -Way Agreement including any
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01-95
Page 4
extension thereof or as long as the Encroachment Permit is valid. Upon
termination or expiration of the Lease Agreement or License,
Encroachment Permit, Right -of -Way Agreement or upon the failure of
Grantee to build the facility within 180 days of its approval, the Design
Review approval for the facility shall become null and void and the facility
shall be removed within thirty (30) days from such termination or
expiration.
d. Design Review approval for aboveground accessory equipment associated
with the operation of the utility facilities shall be considered in accordance
with the process and criteria as outlined in Section 7 of these guidelines.
e. in addition to the information requested in the Development Application
Form, the following items shall be required for an aboveground utility
facility:
1. A statement providing the reason for the location, design, and
height of the proposed aboveground utility facilities;
2. Evidence satisfactory to the City demonstrating location or co-
location is infeasible on existing structures, light or utilities
poles /towers, and existing sites for reasons of structural support
capabilities, safety, available space, or failing to meet service
coverage area needs;
3. A photo simulation of the proposed aboveground utility facility in
true scale;
4. A site plan showing the locations of all proposed and existing
aboveground utility facilities;
5. A screening plan showing the specific placement of landscaping or
any other proposed screening materials to be used to screen the
aboveground utility facilities, including the proposed color(s); and,
6. A signed statement that the applicant agrees to allow for co-
location of additional aboveground utility facilities on the same
structures or within the same site location, or whether such co-
location is infeasible, and the reasons for such infeasibility.
f. Comprehensive Manual for Aboveground Utility Facilities.
1. A comprehensive manual may be submitted in lieu of a Design
Review application for new or replacement aboveground utility
facilities that meet each of the requirements of Section 5 of the
Design Guidelines. The manual shall contain sufficient information
to verify compliance with Section 5. When a project is located
within a redevelopment project area, the comprehensive manual
submitted to the Community Development Department shall be
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 5
routed to the Redevelopment Agency for a finding of conformity to
the respective redevelopment plan. Upon approval of the
comprehensive manual, the applicant shall comply with Section 4.1
with respect to obtaining applicable permits.
2. Installation of subsequent aboveground utility facilities in
accordance with an approved comprehensive manual shall not be
subject to a new Design Review process.
SECTION 5: DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
Aboveground utility facilities on public property and in the public right -of -way shall be
placed in accordance with criteria listed below. Aboveground accessory equipment located
inside cabinets, enclosures, artificial rocks, boxes, or other structures shall be subject to
criteria listed in Section 7 of these guidelines.
The following criteria shall apply:
a. Location: Aboveground utility facilities on public property and In the public right -of-
way shall be placed in locations where there is little or no interference with public
use of the properties and the rights or reasonable convenience of property owners
who adjoin the properties.
b. Stealth Facility. Except for street light poles being used solely for providing
Illumination, all other aboveground utility facilities shall be designed as stealth
facilities with concealed antennas to be placed within, on, or attached to existing
structures such as buildings, utility poles, light poles, utility towers, freestanding
signs, score boards, towers, or fencing and shall blend into the surrounding
environment or be architecturally integrated.
C. Co- location. Aboveground utility facilities shall be co- located with existing
aboveground utility facilities where possible. Whenever any existing utility facilities
are located underground within the public right -of -way, the utility providers with
permission to occupy the same public right -of -way shall co- locate their utility
facilities underground.
d. Colors. Any part of aboveground utility facilities visible to public view shall have
subdued colors and non - reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials
and colors and shall be covered with an anti - graffiti material, when appropriate.
e. Screening. For building- or structure- mounted facilities, screening shall be
compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture, and /or materials of the
building or structure.
f. Landscaping. When landscape screening is proposed or required, the landscaping
shall be compatible with the surrounding landscape area and shall be a type and
variety capable of screening the aboveground utility facilities. All landscaping areas
shall be adequately maintained which includes, but is not limited to: trimming,
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 6
mowing, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of
diseased or dead plants.
g. Signs. Any signs attached to aboveground utility facilities shall comply with the City
of Tustin Sign Code.
h. Accessory Equipment. Accessory equipment associated with the operation of the
utility facilities shall be designed, located and be made part of the structures (i.e. as
part of the base or support structure) or be located within buildings, enclosures, or
cabinets in accordance with Section 7 of these guidelines.
I. Required Removal. The City, in accordance with the Lease Agreement or License,
Right -of -Way Agreement, or Encroachment Permit, as applicable, reserves the
right to require the removal or relocation of any aboveground utility facility when
determined to be necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare by giving
ninety (90) days notice.
j. Undergrounding. The City reserves the right to require that all utility facilities,
including their accessory equipment, be placed underground when technologically
feasible.
SECTION 6: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development standards, including height limits for any aboveground utility facility on
public property and in the public right -of -way, shall be determined pursuant to the
Design Review process.
SECTION 7: ABOVEGROUND ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT
Aboveground accessory equipment for aboveground utility facilities located inside
cabinets, enclosures, artificial rocks, boxes, or other structures shall be subject to the
following criteria:
7.1 Process
a. Replacement Aboveground Accessory Equipment that are the Same Size
as Existing Aboveground Accessory Equipment.
Installation of replacement aboveground accessory equipment shall be
approved in conjunction with issuance of an Encroachment Permit,
provided the replacement aboveground accessory equipment is the same
size or smaller than the existing aboveground accessory equipment and
the aboveground accessory equipment complies with the height
requirements set forth in Section 7.3 herein.
b. New Aboveground Accessory Equipment or Replacement Aboveground
Accessory Equipment that are Larger than Existing Aboveground
Accessory Equipment.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 7
Installation of new aboveground accessory equipment or replacement
aboveground accessory equipment that are larger than the existing
aboveground accessory equipment may be approved in conjunction with
issuance of a concurrent Encroachment Permit/Design Review
application, provided that each the following requirements are met:
1. No aboveground accessory equipment may be located adjacent to
a front -yard area of a residentially zoned or used property.
2. The aboveground accessory equipment complies with the height
requirements set forth in Section 7.3 herein.
3. The aboveground accessory equipment complies with the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
4. No aboveground accessory equipment may be located in an area
that obstructs line of sight at an intersection, driveway, or alley.
C. Comprehensive Manual in Lieu of a Design Review.
1. A comprehensive manual may be submitted in lieu of a Design
Review application for new or replacement aboveground accessory
equipment that meets each of the requirements of Section 7.1(b)
above. The manual shall contain sufficient information to verify
compliance with the above requirements such as type and size of
the proposed aboveground accessory equipment. When a project
is located within redevelopment project areas, the comprehensive
manual submitted to the Community Development Department
shall be routed to the Redevelopment Agency for finding of
conformity to the respective redevelopment plans. Upon approval
of the comprehensive manual, the applicant shall obtain an
Encroachment Permit. The Community Development and Public
Works Departments shall review the Encroachment Permit
application.
2. Installation of aboveground accessory equipment in accordance
with an approved comprehensive manual shall not be subject to a
Design Review process.
d. New Aboveground Accessory Equipment or Replacement Aboveground
Accessory Equipment that cannot comply with Requirements for
Concurrent Encroachment Permit/Design Review [Section 7.1 (b)].
Installation of new aboveground accessory equipment or replacement
aboveground accessory equipment that are larger than the existing
aboveground accessory equipment and cannot comply with the
requirements for a concurrent Encroachment Permit/Design Review
[Section 7.1(b)j require a Design Review prior to issuance of
Encroachment Permits.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 8
e. System Upgrades
System upgrades which require substantial installation of new and
replacement aboveground accessory equipment shall require Design
Review approval prior to issuance of Encroachment Permits when Design
Review is required by these guidelines. A comprehensive Master Plan
depicting the locations of all new and replacement aboveground
accessory equipment shall be submitted concurrently with the Design
Review application.
7.2. Development Guidelines
Location, size, and screening of proposed aboveground accessory equipment
will be considered by the Community Development Department in accordance
with the following criteria:
a. Location
1. Whenever feasible, accessory equipment should be installed
underground. If it is not technologically feasible to install accessory
equipment underground, the utility provider shall submit a letter of
explanation regarding the hardship associated with or infeasibility of
underground installation. One letter may be included in the
comprehensive manual described in Section 7.1(c) for all proposed
accessory equipment within the manual.
2. When underground installation is not feasible, the following order of
preference shall be considered for aboveground installation of
accessory equipment of any size:
a. Aboveground accessory equipment should be designed as
stealth facility.
b. Aboveground accessory equipment should be located
adjacent to non - residential properties in an area where no
modification to the existing right -of -way would be required
and existing landscaping is present to screen the accessory
equipment.
C. Aboveground accessory equipment should be located
adjacent to side or rear yards of residential properties,
preferably on major streets where no modification to the
existing right -of -way would be required and existing
landscaping is present to screen the accessory equipment.
d. Aboveground accessory equipment should be located as
closely as possible to the shared property line between the
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 9
front yards of residential properties where no sight distance
from driveways would be obstructed.
3. Consideration shall be given to the number of existing aboveground
accessory equipment within a particular area and over -
concentration of aboveground accessory equipment shall be
avoided. Over- concentration is defined as more than one (1)
aboveground accessory equipment installed adjacent to the same
side of a property. if a sufficient distance separation Is not
technologically feasible:
a. Aboveground accessory equipment shall be located as far
as possible from existing aboveground accessory
equipment; and,
b. The accessory equipment owner /installer shall submit a
letter of explanation regarding the hardship associated with
or unfeasibility of installing the aboveground accessory
equipment at a sufficient distance from existing aboveground
accessory equipment.
4. Aboveground accessory equipment located in parkway areas
should be located at the same distance from the curb as other
aboveground accessory equipment along the parkway to create a
uniform setback distance and appearance.
5. Aboveground accessory equipment shall not:
a. Obstruct line of sight requirements at intersections or
driveways;
b. Obstruct or hinder opening of vehicle doors;
C. Obstruct disabled access along public sidewalks to the
extent that a minimum of four (4) feet clear sidewalk would
not be maintained;
d. Interfere with any existing or proposed improvement
projects.
7.3 Height
a. The height of any replacement aboveground accessory equipment that
are larger than existing or new aboveground accessory equipment to be
located adjacent to the front, side, or rear yards of residentially zoned
properties may not exceed the permitted height of fencing as determined
at the property line in residentially zoned areas.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 10
b. The height of any replacement aboveground accessory equipment that
are larger than existing or new aboveground accessory equipment located
,in non - residential areas will be considered on a case -by -case basis.
7.4 Screening
a. In residentially zoned areas, aboveground accessory equipment shall be
enclosed or screened to match or complement surrounding features such
as fencing, buildings, or landscaping. The use of a matching accessory
equipment color or applied paint, texturing, or faux finishing, or other
techniques shall be applied In accordance with manufacturer
recommendations.
b. The use of crash posts is discouraged. However, if shown to be
necessary, the exterior finish of the crash post should be painted the color
of the aboveground accessory equipment.
C. Access openings shall face away from street frontages whenever feasible.
7.5 STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
a. Noise emanating from aboveground accessory equipment shall not
exceed the City's adopted Noise Ordinance standards.
b. The accessory equipment owner /company shall file the accessory
equipment identification number, company name, person responsible for
maintenance of the accessory equipment, and the phone number with the
Public Works Department. This information may be included in the
comprehensive manual described in Section 7.1(c) of these guidelines.
C. The aboveground accessory equipment shall not bear any signs of
advertising devices (other than certification, warning, or other required
seals or signage).
d. Aboveground accessory equipment shall be constructed or treated with
appropriate materials which discourage or repel graffiti and the accessory
equipment owner shall be responsible for removing graffiti from accessory
equipment within forty -eight (48) hours. Accessory equipment owners
shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary enforcement
action related to graffiti removal.
e. Any removal of landscaping necessary to install the aboveground
accessory equipment shall be replaced with landscaping materials similar
in number, type, and size as approved by the Directors of Community
Development and Public Works. Landscape materials located in a public
parkway shall be maintained by the adjacent property owner and
landscape materials located on public properties or in the public right -of-
way shall be maintained by the City, unless provided for in a Lease or
License Agreement and /or Right -of -way Agreement.
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95
Page 11
f. The utility provider or accessory equipment installing entity shall be
responsible for reconstruction of in -kind facilities within the public right -of-
way that are damaged or modified during installation of aboveground
accessory equipment.
g. Prior to installation, the utility provider shall provide notification to adjacent
property owners within a one hundred (100) foot radius indicating the type,
location, and size of aboveground accessory equipment that will be
installed and the estimated start and ending dates of construction.
h. The aboveground accessory equipment shall be constructed of a material
that will be rust resistant (i.e. stainless steel, etc.). The utility provider
shall be responsible for treating any rust by either repainting or any other
method recommended by the manufacturer that eliminates the rust.
SECTION 8: ABANDONMENT
An aboveground utility facility and /or its accessory equipment is considered abandoned
if it is no longer in service or is in default pursuant to default provisions in any Lease
Agreement, License, Right -of -Way Agreement or any other applicable agreements or
licenses. A written notice of the determination of abandonment by the City shall be sent
or delivered to the Grantee. The Grantee shall have ninety (90) days to remove the
facility at the Grantee's sole cost and expense or provide the Community Development
Department with evidence that the use has not been discontinued. Such removal shall
be in accordance with proper health and safety requirements.
If the use of the aboveground utility facility and /or its accessory equipment is
discontinued for any reason, the Grantee shall notify the City of Tustin in writing no later
than thirty (30) days after the discontinuation of use. Aboveground utility facilities and
their accessory equipment that are no longer being used shall be removed within ninety
(90) days after the discontinuation of use. Such removal shall be in accordance with
health and safety requirements. All disturbed areas shall be restored to original
conditions at the Grantee's expense.
If the facility is not removed within the required ninety (90) day period, the City shall be
entitled to remove the facility at the Grantee's sole cost and expense. The Grantee
shall execute such documents of title to convey all right, title, and interest in the
abandoned aboveground utility facility and its accessory equipment to the City.
SECTION 9: LEASE AGREEMENT OR LICENSE
All persons wishing to construct, attach, install, operate, maintain, or modify a
aboveground utility facility and its accessory equipment on public property, exclusive of the
public right -of -way, in which the City has ownership, easement, leasehold, or any other
possessory interest after approval of a Design Review application shall obtain a Lease
Agreement or License and any other approval required under these guidelines. A Lease
Agreement or License shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney's office and the
City Manager's office as to the specific terms and conditions required.
City of Tustin
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RESOLUTION NO. 01 -95
I, PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, hereby certifies that the whole number of the members of the City
Council of the City of Tustin is five; and that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 01-
95 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19' day of
November, 2001, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Worley, Thomas, Bone, Doyle, Kawashima
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None
COUNCILMEMBER. ABSTAINED: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None
72moOQ � -
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT C
LETTER DATED AUGUST 28, 2013
August 28, 2013
,lustina Willkom
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
Re: AT &T Lightspeed Facility information
Dcar Ms.Willkom:
1,
SEP - 5 2M
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6Y:
Per your request, the following provides additional information as to why AT &T cannot
place its Lightspeed cabinets underground.
Technical Requirements
Lightspeed technology consists of high -speed electronic circuitry needed to light the
fiber- optics and convert the fiber signal to a bandwidth that can be transmitted over
copper to residences. As such, if it were placed underground, it would have to be in a
controlled environment, free From moisture and excessive temperature extremes. It
would also have to be placed in a vault or enclosure large enough for regular access by
Our technicians for routine maintenance and repair. Just like you could not bury your
personal computer in your backyard and expect it to function (al least not for long),
AT &T cannot simply bury the cabinct with this technology underground.
In addition, the Lightspeed technology must be placed in close proximity to residential
customers in order to use the existing copper distribution network and maintain sufficient
signal speed and quality. To do so, the fiber connection and Lightspeed equipment have
to be within several thousand feel of the residences in the vicinity of our existing service
area interface (" SAF) cabinets. There are multiple SAls in Tustin's residential
neighborhoods that could potentially be paired with a Lightspeed cabinct. Therefore, as
discussed in more detail below, placing a nen, CEV at each of these locutions is not a
viable option.
AT &T currently does have some controlled environment vaults (`CEV") that can be used
to deploy Lightspeed technology in certain limited circumstances, i.e., where a CEV
already exists, has available space, and is in close proximity to our residential customers.
The existing CEVs are not flush to grade in any event, and the above ground hatch may
actually be larger than Our Lightspeed cabinets.
Practical Considerations
Given the need for u controlled environment and technician access, any underground
structure housing the Lightspeed equipment would have to be extremely large. Existing
CEVs typically measure 16' x 10' x 6', and 4' x 3'6` x 6'S' of which is above ground.
There is clearly not enough room in the residential public riglus of wiry of Tustin for
these large underground Vaults. The vaults would block use of the rights of'way by other
Utilities, including City water and server, creating traffic issues during construction and
after completion when being accessed by our technicians.
In addition, the above ground Lightspeed cabinet was designed to fit within the right of
way usually behind or in the sidewalk area. The access point for -,in underground vault
would most likely extend into the road portion of* the right of zvay creating significant
safety concerns.
As noted above, other factors limiting the feasibility of placing the Lightspeed cabinets in
it flush to grade vault include the need for backup power, lighting, gas testing, ventilation,
cooling, alarms, emergency water pumping, and waterproofing.
As a result ol'these limitations, AT &T has traditionally not placed CEVs in close
proximity to residential neighborhoods where the Lightspeed equipment must be
deployed.
Economic ractors
In addition to the technological and practical reasons discussed above, it is not
economically feasible to construct new CEVs tor the Lightspeed technology. Although
our existing CEVs are very expensive to construct, the cost may bejustified because they
serve thousands of customers. The Lightspeed cabinets, on the other hand, will serve
only it few hundred customers and we will need many more of them. As each Lightspeed
cabinet would still require a very large, expensive vault, it would not be economically
feasible to place a new CEV for a single Lightspeed cabinet.
We hope the above response answer your questions about this issue. Please let me know
if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Leslie Monty
Area Manager
AT&T California
i'e1W GIN MIJil:41k to �7
Planning Commission
November 12, 2013 Meeting Minutes
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 12, 2013
7:05 p.m. CALL TO ORDER
Given INVOCATION /PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Commissioner Altowaiji
ROLL CALL:
Present: Chair Kozak
Chair Pro Tern Thompson
Commissioners Altowaiji, Lumbard and Smith
Staff Present Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development
Lois Bobak, Assistant City Attorney
Dana L. Ogdon, Assistant Director of Community Development
Justine Willkom, Assistant Director of Community Development
Scott Reekstin, Principal Planner
Amy Stonich, Senior Planner
Ryan Swiontek, Senior Planner
Edmelynne V. Huffer, Senior Planner
Adrienne DiLeva- Johnson, Senior Management Assistant
Vera Tiscareno, Executive Secretary
None PUBLIC CONCERNS
Approved CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — OCTOBER 8, 2013,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the
October 8, 2013 meeting as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Altowaiji, to move the
Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5 -0.
None PUBLIC HEARINGS
r
j REGULAR BUSINESS:
Continued to 2. DESIGN REVIEW 2013 -12 —AT &T UTILITY CABINETS.
January 28, 2014.
Design Review 2013 -12 is a request to install 25
aboveground utility cabinets in, or adjacent to, the public
right -of -way in various locations throughout Tustin to
house and operate lightspeed equipment for U -Verse
service.
APPLICANT: AT &T California
1265 N. Van Buren Street, Room 180
Anaheim, CA 92807
PROPERTY
OWNERS: City of Tustin (23 locations)
Venturanza Del Verde HOA (one location)
Laurelwood HOA (one location)
LOCATION: Citywide
ENVIRONMENTAL:
With the conditions of approval in Resolution No. 4235,
this project is categorically exempt from further
environmental review pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15303, Class
3. However, if potential impacts are not minimized
through the conditions of approval, the proposed project
would require further environmental review and may
require the preparation of an Initial Study and Negative
Declaration or Environmental Impact Report.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission may take one of the following
options:
1. Should the Commission desire to approve all 25
proposed cabinets, as conditioned:
• Adopt Resolution No. 4235 approving Design
Review 2013 -12 to install and operate 25 utility
cabinets (combination of aboveground and
flush- mounted underground), located at various
locations within or adjacent to the public right -
of -way;
2. Should the Commission desire to require that all L_
25 proposed cabinets be underground and flush -
mounted, as conditioned:
Minutes — Planning Commission November 12, 2013 — Page 2 of 7
• Adopt Resolution No. 4235A approving the
installation and operation of 25 flush- mounted
underground utility cabinets, located at various
locations within or adjacent to the public right -
of -way; or
3. Should the Commission desire to deny Design
Review 2013 -12:
• Direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial
with associated findings for consideration by
the Commission at the next regularly scheduled
Planning Commission meeting.
Reekstin Gave a presentation of the item.
Commission questions /concerns generally included: residents
input; masterplan; noise impacts; environmental impacts
(trenching); size /number of cabinets in the future; wireless
conduits; cabinet location; public art; colors of the cabinets;
safety impacts in public right -of -ways; Time Warner's
requirements; character of the community; quality of life
impacts; lack of maintenance of existing facilities; and
surrounding cities and their requirements.
Binsack Commented on the three listed alternatives and stated staff
recommends Resolution No. 4235A as the preferred alternative.
Public comments:
Judy Woolen, a consultant representing AT &T, spoke in
favor of the utility cabinets and Video Ready Access
Devices (VRADs). Stated after meeting with the City in
August and October, the City referred AT &T to take the
item to the Planning Commission.
The applicant, Leslie Monty, spoke supporting AT &T and
the item. She provided background information to the
Commission. AT &T's intent is to eliminate excessive
trenching with the Surface Area Interface (SAIs) and to find
the most appropriate location to place the VRADs.
Further questions by the Commission generally included:
AT &T's masterpian for the cabinets; funding for 25 cabinets
or more; trenching for the fiber optics; proximity between
VRADs and SAIs; clarification on underground VRADs; art
work/program; fiber optics; location of cabinets on
residential property; and separating VRADs and SAIs.
Mlnu(es — Planning Commission November 12, 2013— Page 3 or 7
Leslie Monty addressed each of the Commissioners
questions /concems. Her comments generally included:
there is an unknown additional number of cabinets in the
future dependent upon AT &T's business plan; confirmed
funding for 25 cabinets; possibility of trenching depending
on proximity of the SAls and the VRADs; Southern
California Edison would have to determine the power
source for AT &T; AT &T does not typically trench where
there is new fiber structure; there is no potential to house
both the SAI and VRAD underground due to lack of
technology; the cabinets come with an anti - graffiti coating
therefore it would be a problem for the art program; at this
time AT &T does not paint, or apply art to the cabinets.
Bobak stated staff did not analyze the amount of trenching
involved so staff is in no position to say whether or not the
approval of this application would lead to additional
trenching. it would depend on whether or not the trenching
would be exempt, categorically, from CEQA.
Paul Albarian, a resident, spoke expressing concern with
regard to the proposed location of cabinets on Kalua Lane.
Mr. Albarian's concern is the potential of AT &T placing
cabinets on Kalua Lane, where there are currently none.
Staff clarified the proposed location is actually on White
Sand. Mr. Aibarian asked if the cabinets could possibly be
'doubled -up' at Pine Tree park to avoid impacting any
homes. He also asked if all 25 locations would be
necessary and inquired if they all be used.
The Commission entered into deliberation of the item. The
Commission's discussion generally included:
Concern with 25 cabinets only serving 1/3 of the community; the
inability to accommodate an art program; underground
requirements; adhering to the Noise Ordinance; reluctance to
approve above - ground cabinets at this time; co- location; lack of
screening; other alternatives; would like to replicate what other
cities are doing; residents should have the opportunity to use
alternative resources (Time Warner, Cox, etc.); no vision on
accommodating future development; public's input; and
Commission needs to be cognizant of key points of City Council
policy of location and number of above - ground cabinets and
undergrounding as an option.
Kozak Thanked staff and AT &T for working together and bringing the
package to the Commission as well as the public comments.
Called for a motion to continue the item. if item is continued,
Minutes — Planning Commission November 12, 2013 — Page 4 or 7
1
t
f
staff and AT &T can continue to work together and address the
Commission's concerns and bring back a better product for
AT &T so that there is certainty in their future, and a better plan
for the community which is in keeping with the policy direction
from our City Council.
Altowaiji Stated to send item back to staff to work with AT &T to address
comments from the Commission and public.
Thompson Thanked staff for the summary booklet and the presentation.
Generally commented that AT &T would need to do more
investment of time; four cabinet locations out of the 25 are not
recommended for approval; art program is already in the
resolution; concerned with looking at a master plan that is
'highly subject to change' if there are no plans to 'build'; asking
for 'maintenance' is outside the guidelines being that the City is
in compliance with the guidelines; the co- location of the
cabinets; questioning if the Commission is extending the
application of the guidelines.
Lumbard Commended staff on their attempt to have cabinets
underground. Requested clarification from Bobak on what the
impact would be if the item was denied.
Bobak A resolution would be needed to deny the application and AT &T
would then have the opportunity to appeal with the City Council.
A new application would then need to be submitted. Cannot re-
submit the original application.
Binsack If the Commission motions for the fourth alternative, then the
Commission should identify the items of concern to be
addressed at a future meeting. She summarized the items of
Commission concern that needed to be addressed including:
providing art/screening on the cabinets; proposal violates the
fundamental intent of the guidelines and ordinance; no
desire /inability to co- locate the two cabinets; AT &T has not
demonstrated feasibility to underground cabinets at each
location; noise levels from the existing cabinets and potential
impact of additional cabinets and the quality of life; the character
of the community based on the additional cabinets within the
community; safety concerns with respect to disabled access in
rights -of -ways and sidewalk areas; and schedule of
maintenance. She noted if a fourth alternative is passed, she
recommends it be brought to the January 28th meeting.
Minutes — Planning Commission November 12, 2013 — Page 5 of 7
Motion: It was moved by Altowaiji, seconded by Kozak, to continue the
item to the January 28, 2014 meeting to address the noted
items. Motion carried 3 -2. Chair Pro Tern Thompson and
Commissioner Lumbard dissented.
STAFF CONCERNS:
The Director reported as follows:
• Mayor's Prayer Breakfast was held on 11/21
• Tustin Ranch Road Groundbreaking was held on 11/23
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Lumbard 0 Expressed the tragic events of the Philippine's typhoon
"Yolanda ". Families and homes were destroyed. Please
consider making a donation to the Red Cross; and
• Month of November is designated month for " Movember"
(for moustache) to raise awareness for testicular and
prostate cancer.
Altowaiji a Thanked Scott for the comprehensive report and all the
effort staff put into the work.
E
5
Smith & No concerns.
Thompson 0 Attended the OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee;
• Attended the Art Walk on 10/19 and gave a tour in Old
Town. It was a very fascinating event;
• Attended the Planning Officials Forum on 10/25. It was
wonderful to see how City staff is involved. Learned about
housing means for workers, alternate transportation,
demographics. Fantastic presentation by a USC professor;
• November 1st, attended Dino Dash — finished 5k in 22
minutes 43 seconds —15th Place; and
• November 5 -8 attended Urban Land Institute in Chicago. It
was a great forum: Workshops on development, age
qualified, and healthy housing.
Kozak 0 Attended the 61h Annual Art Walk. It was a great event;
• Historic property presentation to the owners of the
Primrose house on 'B' Street;
• Attended the Planning Officials Forum on 10/24. Thanks
to Elizabeth and other members; and
• Recognized all soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen who
have given their lives to our Country in the line of dutyl
Minutes— Planning Commission November 12, 2013— Page 6 of 7
i
i
3
9:03 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is
scheduled for Tuesday, November 26, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way.
IC1
:C
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission November 12, 2013 — Page 7 of 7
r
■L/_►
Letter dated January 6, 2014
om
January 6, 2014
Chairperson Steve Kozak
Chairperson Pro Tern Jeff Thompson
Commissioner Austin Lumbard
Commissioner Ryder Smith
Commissioner Wisam Altowaiji
RE: Design Review 2013 -12 - AT &T Utility Cabinets
AT &T would like to respond to the areas of concern expressed by the Planning Commission at
their November 12, 2013 regular meeting. Our comments are below.
Art on AT &T Utility Cabinets
AT &T does not allow art on any of its above - ground utility cabinets, for several reasons.
Many of AT &T's utility cabinets house active electronics and the application of art may seriously
hamper performance of the electronics and void manufacturer product warranties.
AT &T's Lightspeed cabinets are coated with a finish that minimizes the accumulation of dirt and
soot and that reduces corrosion.
Service Area
AT &T's build statewide has to comply with the statewide build requirements of the Digital
Infrastructure and Video Competition Act. This can result in changes to AT &T's build plans
throughout the course of the build, and AT &T cannot make any commitment at this time about
how much of the City will be covered by the Lightspeed upgrade.
Noise Ordinance
Exhibit A of Resolution No. 01 -95 Item 7.5 Standard Conditions of Approval (a) states "Noise
emanating from above ground accessory equipment shall not exceed the City's adopted Noise
Ordinance standards." AT &T's Lightspeed (VRAD) cabinets will be installed in compliance with
the requirements of the City's Noise Ordinance.
Screening /Landscape
AT &T will provide landscape near Lightspeed cabinets in locations where landscaping and
irrigation are already present. Drought- resistant vegetation will be used in a manner that will be
compatible with the surrounding area. Landscaping requirements will be jointly agreed upon on
a site -by -date basis between the City and AT &T.
Above — Ground Installations
AT &T's letter of August 28, 2013 explained why Lightspeed cabinets cannot be placed
underground. A copy of this letter is attached.
In closing, AT &T is requesting Planning Commission approval of the 18 proposed locations for
VRAD installations that have been deemed acceptable and "in accordance with the Design
Guidelines" as stated by City staff. AT &T is requesting these 18 locations be approved for
above - ground installation.
AT &T would like to work with City staff on the remaining 4 locations identified as being not
acceptable in an effort to reach agreement on those locations.
Thank you for your consideration of our request to approve the 18 locations deemed by City
staff as being "in accordance with the Design Guidelines ".
Sincerely,
Leslie Monty
Area Manager
AT &T California
cc: Elizabeth Binsack
Scott Reekstin
Justina Willkom
at &t
August 28, 2013
Justina Willkom
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
Re: AT &T Lightspeed Facility Information
Dear Ms. W illkom:
Per your request, the following provides additional information as to why AT &T cannot
place its Lightspeed cabinets underground.
Technical Requirements
Lightspeed technology consists of high -speed electronic circuitry needed to light the
fiber- optics and convert the fiber signal to a bandwidth that can be transmitted over
copper to residences. As such, if it were placed underground, it would have to be in a
controlled environment, free from moisture and excessive temperature extremes. It
would also have to be placed in a vault or enclosure large enough for regular access by
our technicians for routine maintenance and repair. Just like you could not bury your
personal computer in your backyard and expect it to function (at least not for long),
AT &T cannot simply bury the cabinet with this technology underground.
In addition, the Lightspeed technology must be placed in close proximity to residential
customers in order to use the existing copper distribution network and maintain sufficient
signal speed and quality. To do so, the fiber connection and Lightspeed equipment have
to be within several thousand feet of the residences in the vicinity of our existing service
area interface ( "SAP') cabinets. There are multiple SAls in Tustin's residential
neighborhoods that could potentially be paired with a Lightspeed cabinet. Therefore, as
discussed in more detail below, placing a new CEV at each of these locations is not a
viable option.
AT &T currently does have some controlled environment vaults ( "CEV ") that can be used
to deploy Lightspeed technology in certain limited circumstances; i.e., where a CEV
already exists, has available space, and is in close proximity to our residential customers.
The existing CEVs are not flush to grade in any event, and the above ground hatch may
actually be larger than our Lightspeed cabinets.
Practical Considerations
Given the need for a controlled environment and technician access, any underground
structure housing the Lightspeed equipment would have to be extremely large. Existing
CEVs typically measure 16' x 10' x 6', and 4' x 3'6" x 6'5" of which is above ground.
There is dearly not enough room in the residential public rights of way of Tustin for
these large underground vaults. The vaults would block use of the rights of way by other
utilities, including City water and sewer, creating traffic issues (luring construction and
after completion when being accessed by our technicians.
In addition, the above ground Lightspeed cabinet was designed to tit within the right of
way usually behind or in the sidewalk area. The access point for an underground vault
would most likely extend into the road portion of the right of way creating significant
safety concerns.
As noted above, other factors limiting the feasibility of placing the Lightspeed cabinets in
a flush to grade vault include the need for backup power, lighting, gas testing, ventilation,
cooling, alarms, emergency water pumping, and waterproofing.
As a result of these limitations, AT &T has traditionally not placed CEVs in close
proximity to residential neighborhoods where the Lightspeed equipment must be
deployed.
Economic Factors
In addition to the technological and practical reasons discussed above, it is not
economically feasible to construct new CEVs for the Lightspeed technology. Although
our existing CEVs are very expensive to construct, the cost may be justified because they
serve thousands of customers. The Lightspeed cabinets, on the other hand, will serve
only a few hundred customers and we will need many more of them. As each Lightspeed
cabinet would still require a very large, expensive vault, it would not be economically
feasible to place a new CEV for a single Lightspeed cabinet.
We hope the above response answer your questions about this issue. Please let me know
if you have any additional questions.
Sincerely,
Leslie Monty
Area Manager
AT &T California
ATTACHMENT
Public Resources Code Section 21159.27
A.aadmlarr ofF.indranmenial l'nrfem tals20/3
§ 21159.25. [DELETED]
(10A 5mhm
§ 21159.26. REDUCTIONS IN HOUSING UNITS AS MITIGATION DISCOURAGED
With respect to a project that includes a housing development, a public agency may not reduce the
proposed number of housing units as a mitigation measure or project alternative for a particular
significant effect on the environment if it determines that there is another feasible specific
mitigation measure or project alternative that would provide a comparable level of mitigation. This
section does not affect any other requirement regarding the residential density of that project.
§ 21159.27. PROHIBITION AGAINST PIECEMEALING TO QUALIFY FOR EXEMPTIONS
A project may not be divided into smaller projects to qualify for one or more exemptions pursuant
to this article.
§ 21159.28.
(a) If a residential or mixed -use residential project is consistent with the use designation, density,
building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in either a sustainable
communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy, for which the State Air Resources
Board pursuant to subparagraph (1) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the
Government Code has accepted the metropolitan planning organization's determination that the
sustainable communities strategy or the alternative planning strategy would, if implemented,
achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and if the project incorporates the
mitigation measures required by an applicable prior environmental document, then any findings
or other determinations for an exemption, a negative declaration, a mitigated negative
declaration, a sustainable communities environmental assessment, an environmental impact
report, or addenda prepared or adopted for the project pursuant to this division shall not be
required to reference, describe, or discuss (1) growth inducing impacts; or (2) any project
specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light -duty truck trips generated by the project on
global warming or the regional transportation network.
(b) Any environmental impact report prepared for a project described in subdivision (a) shall not be
required to reference, describe, or discuss a reduced residential density alternative to address
the effects of car and light -duty truck trips generated by the project.
(c) "Regional transportation network;' for purposes of this section, means all existing and
proposed transportation system improvements, including the state transportation system, that
were included in the transportation and air quality conformity modeling, including congestion
modeling, for the final regional transportation plan adopted by the metropolitan planning
organization, but shall not include local streets and roads. Nothing in the foregoing relieves any
project from a requirement to comply with any conditions, exactions, or fees for the mitigation
of the project's impacts on the structure, safety, or operations of the regional transportation
network or local streets and roads.
(d) A residential or mixed -use residential project is a project where at least 75 percent of the total
building square footage of the project consists of residential use or a project that is a transit
priority project as defined in Section 21155.
Chapter 5: Submission of Information
§ 21160. APPLICATION FOR LEASE, PERMIT, LICENSE, ETC.; DATA AND INFORMATION;
PURPOSE; TRADE SECRETS
Whenever any person applies to any public agency for a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other
entitlement for use, the public agency may require that person to submit data and information
W
ATTACHMENT G
Resolution Nos. 4235 and 4235A
RESOLUTION NO. 4235
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
2013 -12 AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION AND
OPERATION OF 25 ABOVEGROUND UTILITY CABINETS
IN, OR ADJACENT TO, THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY IN
VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT TUSTIN TO
HOUSE AND OPERATE LIGHTSPEED EQUIPMENT FOR
U -VERSE SERVICE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application for Design Review 2013 -12 was filed by AT &T
California requesting to install and operate 25 aboveground utility cabinets
in, or adjacent to, the public right -of -way in various locations throughout
Tustin to house and operate its Lightspeed equipment for its U -verse
service.
B. That pursuant to Tustin City Code Sections 7264 and 9272, the Community
Development Director is authorized to consider the proposed Design
Review. However, the Community Development Director forwarded the
Design Review application to the Planning Commission for consideration
and action to allow for a public meeting to accept comments and testimony
from the general public regarding the proposed project.
C. That a public meeting was duly called, noticed, and held for Design Review
2013 -12 on November 12, 2013, by the Planning Commission. Design
Review 2013 -12 was continued to January 28, 2014, to provide the applicant
the opportunity to fully address items of Commission concern.
D. That, as conditioned, the proposed cabinet locations comply with Tustin City
Code Section 7260 related to Design Review of Aboveground Utility
Facilities on Public Property and in the Public Right -of -Way and with City
Council Resolution No. 01 -95 establishing Design Review guidelines for
aboveground utility facilities on public property and in the public right -of -way
E. That, as conditioned, when located within residential areas, the proposed
cabinets that are aboveground are located adjacent to side or rear yards of
residential properties and along major streets.
F. That the location, size, and general appearance of the proposed cabinets,
as conditioned, are compatible with the surrounding area in that as
conditioned the cabinets would be underground, screened with
landscaping, or of a color that blends with its surroundings. In accordance
Resolution No, 4235
DR 2013 -12
Page 2
with the City's Guidelines, cabinets that cannot be effectively screened
should be located underground. To allow the proposed cabinets that are
not effectively screened to locate in the City's right -of -way would set a
precedent such that other providers would ignore the City's guidelines.
G. That the proposed cabinets will provide coverage to areas that are currently
deficient of the AT &T U -verse service.
H. That the location, size, aesthetic features, and general appearance of the
proposed facilities will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of
the area, the present or future development therein, or the community as a
whole. In making such findings, the Planning Commission has considered at
least the following items:
1. Height, bulk, and area of proposed structure — The proposed
aboveground utility cabinets, each with a height of about four feet, a
width of about four feet and a depth of about two feet, are larger in size
than, but similar in appearance to, other utility cabinets in the public
right -of -way.
2. Setbacks and site planning — Of the 25 proposed locations, 21 are
within the public right -of -way, two are within homeowner association
landscape areas, and two are within public parks. Aboveground
cabinets will be conditioned to not obstruct line of sight requirements,
obstruct or hinder the opening of vehicle doors or obstruct disabled
access.
3. Exterior material and colors — The proposed cabinets are constructed
of metal and each cabinet is conditioned to be of a color that blends
with its surroundings.
4. Towers and antennae — No towers or antennae are proposed.
5. Landscaping and parking area design and traffic circulation —The
proposed cabinets within public parks and homeowners association
landscape areas are required to be screened with landscaping.
Parking area design and traffic circulation are not directed impacted.
6. Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed
structure — Four of the proposed cabinets are required to be
undergounded. The remaining 21 cabinets are required through
conditions of approval to be adequately screened or of a color that
blends with its surroundings.
7. Physical relationship of proposed structure to existing structures — The
proposed cabinets would be located in close proximity to existing
residences, fences, and walls, but would not be located in front or a
residence or adjacent to an open side yard of a residence.
Resolution No. 4235
DR 2013 -12
Page 3
8. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing
structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and
public thoroughfares. The proposed cabinets are required to be of a
color that blends with adjacent landscape features and structures and
may be required in areas such as Old Town, to be made available for
public art in the future.
9. Development guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council —
As conditioned, the proposed cabinets comply with the City Council's
adopted Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities.
I. That the proposed wireless facility complies with the City Council Resolution
No. 01 -95 (Design Guidelines for Aboveground Utility Facilities and their
Accessory Equipment) in that:
1. Location — 18 of the 25 proposed locations are placed where there is
little or no interference with public use of the properties and /or the
rights or reasonable convenience of property owners who adjoin the
properties. Seven of the 25 proposed locations would significantly
impact the use of private property and the reasonable convenience of
property owners by creating safety hazards, impacting line of sight,
creating visual clutter, and /or impeding pedestrian access. However,
optional locations were proposed at two of these seven locations, such
that these concerns have been minimized. For the remaining five
locations, conditions have been included to require undergrounding, an
alternative location, or landscaping (for the proposed public park and
homeowners association locations).
2. Stealth Facility —The proposed cabinets are not stealth in design and
the designs are not intended to integrate with existing structures or
blend with the surrounding environment. Condition 2.12 requires all
cabinets to be of a color that blends with adjacent surroundings. In
some locations, landscaping is required.
3. Co- location - The proposed cabinets are not integrated with existing
cabinets and no co- location alternative was submitted. When
technologically feasible, co- location requests shall be considered and a
good faith effort shall be made to accommodate the request.
4. Colors — Each cabinet will be required to be of a color that blends with
its surrounding environment.
5. Screening /Landscaping — No screening method or landscaping was
proposed for the cabinets. Pursuant to Condition No. 2.20,
landscaping may be required at select locations.
6. Signage — Only signage related to certifications and warnings will be
allowed on each cabinet in accordance with proposed Condition No.
2.5. No advertising would be permitted on the cabinets.
Resolution No. 4235
DR 2013 -12
Page 4
7. Accessory Equipment — The power pedestals are integrated with the
proposed cabinets.
8. Required Removal — Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines, the cabinet
could be required to be removed if necessary to protect public health,
safety, and welfare.
9. Undergrounding — Pursuant to the 2001 Guidelines, and as
conditioned, the City reserves the right to require that all utility facilities,
including their accessory equipment, be placed underground when
technologically feasible.
J. That this project, as conditioned, is Categorically Exempt pursuant to
Section 15303, Class 3, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of
Regulations (Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act).
II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Design Review 2013 -12, a request to
install and operate 25 aboveground utility cabinets in, or adjacent to, the public
right -of -way in various locations throughout Tustin to house and operate its
Lightspeed equipment for its U -verse service, subject to the conditions contained
within Exhibit A attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular
meeting held on the 28th day of January, 2014.
STEVE KOZAK
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4235 was
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held
on the 28th day of January, 2014.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
AN011 :1k
11i
Resolution No. 4235
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 4235
DESIGN REVIEW 2013 -12
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted
plans /exhibits for the project date stamped November 12, 2013, on file with
the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as
modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to
plans during plan check or the encroachment permit process if such
modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other
applicable regulations.
(1) 1.2 All conditions in this Exhibit shall be complied with subject to review and
approval by the Community Development Department.
(1) 1.3 Design Review approval shall remain valid for as long as the
Encroachment Permit is valid. Upon termination or expiration of the
Encroachment Permit or upon the failure of Grantee to install the facility
within 180 days of its approval, the Design Review approval for the facility
shall become null and void and the facility shall be removed within thirty
(30) days from such termination or expiration. At the time of removal,
restoration of the area is required. Time extensions may be considered if a
written request is received by the Community Development Department
within thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Design Review 2013 -12 is contingent upon the applicant and
property owner signing and returning to the Community Development
Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the
property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk- Recorder a
notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of
Approval' form. The forms shall be established by the Director of
Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to
the Community Development Department.
(1) 1.5 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of
an administrative citation pursuant to Section 1162(a) of the Tustin City
Code.
311 •
(1)
STANDARD CONDITION
(5)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS
(2)
CEQA MITIGATION
(6)
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
(3)
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE /S
(7)
PC /CC POLICY
(4)
DESIGN REVIEW
***
EXCEPTIONS
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235
Page 2
(1) 1.6 The applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants,
from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the
City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside,
challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning
Commission, or any other decision - making body, including staff, concerning
this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such
claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of
any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to
participate in defense of any such action under this condition.
(1) 1.7 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any
necessary code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the
applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City
Council by ordinance.
(1) 1.8 The applicant shall provide a 24 -hour phone number to which problems may
be reported. To ensure continuity on all issues, the name, telephone
number, fax number, and e-mail address of a "single point of contact" in its
Engineering and Maintenance Departments shall be provided to the City's
designated representative upon activation of each facility.
USE RESTRICTIONS
(1) 2.1 A total of 25 utility cabinets are approved to be installed and operated under
Design Review 2013 -12. All cabinets shall be located as depicted in the
approved building permit or encroachment permit plans.
(1) 2.2 No trees on public property shall be relocated or removed to
accommodate the project. The applicant shall make a note to this effect
on the encroachment and /or building permit plans.
(1) 2.3 The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any required approvals or
clearances from any applicable easement holders for work in any easement
areas.
(1) 2.4 The utility cabinets shall be regularly maintained and inspected for safety
and aesthetics by the applicant in accordance with the approved plans.
(1) 2.5 The equipment shall not bear any signs or advertising devices (other than
certification, warning, or other required seals or signage).
(1) 2.6 At building permit or encroachment permit plan check, the applicant shall
submit a plan identifying hardscape, landscape, and other improvements
that will be removed and /or replaced under the proposed plan.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235
Page 3
(1) 2.7 Prior to issuance of building permits for facilities on private property, the
applicant shall obtain approval from the property owner. The project plans
shall make reference to the agreement.
(1) 2.8 The applicant shall evaluate all requests for co- location on each facility by
additional providers(s) and make a good -faith determination of each such
requesting provider's compatibility with the applicant at this location. If, in
the good -faith determination of the applicant, the co- location is technically
compatible, then the applicant shall accommodate such additional
provider if applicable business terms can be successfully negotiated. All
requests for co- location shall be reviewed and approved by the City and
may require a license agreement.
(1) 2.9 All aboveground equipment shall be constructed or treated with
appropriate materials which discourage or repel graffiti and the applicant
shall be responsible for removing graffiti from accessory equipment within
forty -eight (48) hours. The applicant shall be responsible for costs
associated with any necessary enforcement action related to graffiti
removal.
(1) 2.10 Any removal of landscaping necessary to install the equipment shall be
replaced with landscaping materials similar in number, type, and size as
approved by the Directors of Community Development and Public Works.
(1) 2.11 All aboveground equipment shall be constructed of a material that will be
rust resistant (i.e. stainless steel, etc.). The utility provider shall be
responsible for treating any rust by either repainting or any other method
recommended by the manufacturer that eliminates the rust.
(1) 2.12 Any part of the aboveground utility facilities visible to public view shall have
subdued colors and non - reflective materials which blend with surrounding
materials and colors, as determined by the Director of Community
Development or Planning Commission.
(1) 2.13 At least thirty (30) days prior to installation, the utility provider shall provide
notification to adjacent property owners within a one hundred (100) foot
radius indicating the type, location, and size of the equipment that will be
installed, and the estimated start and ending dates of construction.
(1) 2.14 The City of Tustin reserves the right to require that the aboveground utility
cabinets be made available for public art purposes at the expense of the
applicant.
(1) 2.15 The utility cabinets proposed at 1371 Kalua Lane, 1448 Valencia Avenue,
Kensington Park Drive across from Fire Station No. 71, and 2906
Ballesteros Lane, shall be undergrounded unless alternate locations which
comply with the Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development or Planning Commission, can be identified.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235
Page 4
(1) 2.16 The utility cabinet proposed at 13611 Red Hill Avenue shall be located
pursuant to Option 2 as identified in the submitted application, and the utility
cabinet proposed at 15805 Myrtle Avenue shall be located pursuant to
Option 1 as identified in the submitted application.
(1) 2.17 The City, in accordance with the Encroachment Permit, reserves the right to
require the removal or relocation of any aboveground utility facility when
determined to be necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare
by giving ninety (90) days notice.
(1) 2.18 Aboveground cabinets shall not obstruct line of sight requirements at
intersections or driveways; obstruct or hinder opening of vehicle doors;
obstruct disabled access along public sidewalks to the extent that a
minimum of four (4) feet clear sidewalk would not be maintained; and
interfere with any existing or proposed improvement projects.
(1) 2.19 All access openings shall face away from street frontages, unless approved
otherwise by the Director of Community Development or Planning
Commission.
(1) 2.20 Landscape screening shall be required at the following locations: 2850 -2870
Ballesteros Lane (behind), 2906 Ballesteros Lane (HOA), 1402 Bryan
Avenue (Pine Tree Park), 14492 Cherrywood Lane (HOA), 10751
Holderman Court (behind), 14552 Raintree Lane, 1842 Roanoke Avenue
(Centennial Park), 13332 Tiburon Way (behind), and any other location as
required by the Community Development Director.
NOISE
(1) 3.1 All construction operations including engine warm up, delivery, and
loading /unloading of equipment and materials shall be subject to the
provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance, as amended, and may take
place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday and 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Saturday unless the Building Official
determines that said activity will be in substantial conformance with the
Noise Ordinance and the public health and safety will not be impaired
subject to application being made at the time the permit for the work is
awarded or during progress of the work.
(1) 3.2 Noise emanating from the equipment, if any, shall not exceed the City's
Noise Ordinance.
BUILDING DIVISION
(1) 4.1 Cabinets not in the public right -of -way require building permits. At the time
of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the latest edition of
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235
Page 5
the building codes, City Ordinances, State laws, Federal laws, and
regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(1) 5.1 Prior to any work in the public right -of -way (within City parks and within
any public streets), an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from and
applicable fees paid to the Public Works Department.
(1) 5.2 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit for construction within the
public right -of -way, a 24" x 36" construction area traffic control plan, as
prepared by a California Registered Traffic Engineer, or Civil Engineer
experienced in this type of plan preparation, shall be prepared and
submitted to the Public Works Department for approval.
(1) 5.3 Any damage done to existing landscape, irrigation, pedestrian walkways,
parking, and/or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Director
of Parks and Recreation and the City Engineer.
FEES
(1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits or encroachment permits,
payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to,
the following. Payments shall be required based upon those rates in
effect at the time of payment and are subject to change.
a. All applicable Building and Planning plan check and permit fees, and
encroachment permit fees shall be paid to the City of Tustin.
b. Within forty -eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a
CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty -eight
(48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of
limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.
RESOLUTION NO. 4235 A
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN, AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION
AND OPERATION OF 25 FLUSH - MOUNTED
UNDERGROUND UTILITY CABINETS IN, OR ADJACENT
TO, THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY IN VARIOUS
LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT TUSTIN TO HOUSE AND
OPERATE LIGHTSPEED EQUIPMENT FOR U -VERSE
SERVICE.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application, Design Review 2013 -12, was filed by AT &T
California requesting to install and operate 25 aboveground utility cabinets
in, or adjacent to, the public right -of -way in various locations throughout
Tustin to house and operate its Lightspeed equipment for its U -verse
service.
B. That pursuant to Tustin City Code Sections 7264 and 9272, the Community
Development Director is authorized to consider the proposed Design
Review. However, the Community Development Director forwarded the
Design Review application to the Planning Commission for consideration
and action to allow for a public meeting to accept comments and testimony
from the general public regarding the proposed project.
C. That a public meeting was duly called, noticed, and held for Design Review
2013 -12 on November 12, 2013, by the Planning Commission. Design
Review 2013 -12 was continued to January 28, 2014, to provide the applicant
the opportunity to fully address items of Commission concern.
D. That the above ground cabinets proposed by the applicant do not comply
with Tustin City Code Section 7260 related to Design Review of
Aboveground Utility Facilities on Public Property and in the Public Right -of-
Way and with City Council Resolution No. 01 -95 establishing Design Review
guidelines for aboveground utility facilities on public property and in the
public right -of -way, in that the cabinets interfere with public use of the
properties and the rights or reasonable convenience of property owners who
adjoin the properties.
E. That underground flush- mounted cabinets comply with Tustin City Code
Section 7260 related to Design Review of Aboveground Utility Facilities on
Public Property and in the Public Right -of -Way and with City Council
Resolution No. 01 -95 establishing Design Review guidelines for
aboveground utility facilities on public property and in the public right -of -way,
Resolution No. 4235 A
DR 2013 -12
Page 2
in that all utility facilities may be required to be placed underground when
technologically feasible and underground flush- mounted cabinets do not
interfere with public use of the properties and the rights or reasonable
convenience of property owners who adjoin the properties.
F. That AT &T has commonly placed other types of its communication
equipment underground, including facilities in Tustin.
G. That in accordance with the City's Guidelines, cabinets that cannot be
effectively screened should be located underground. To allow the proposed
cabinets that are not effectively screened to locate in the City's right -of -way
would set a precedent such that other providers would ignore the City's
guidelines.
H. The location, size, and general appearance of the proposed cabinets are
compatible with the surrounding area in that the cabinets would be flush -
mounted and underground.
I. The proposed cabinets will provide coverage to areas that are currently
deficient of the AT &T U -verse service.
J. That this project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303, Class
3, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for
the California Environmental Quality Act).
II. The Planning Commission hereby approves the installation and operation of 25
flush- mounted underground utility cabinets in, or adjacent to, the public right -of-
way in various locations throughout Tustin to house and operate its Lightspeed
equipment for its U -verse service, subject to the conditions contained within
Exhibit A attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular
meeting held on the 28th day of January, 2014.
STEVE KOZAK
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
Resolution No. 4235 A
DR 2013 -12
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4235 A was
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held
on the 28th day of January, 2014.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
to
Resolution No. 4235 A
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 4235 A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted
plans /exhibits for the project date stamped November 12, 2013, on file with
the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as
modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to
plans during plan check or the encroachment permit process if such
modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other
applicable regulations.
(1) 1.2 All conditions in this Exhibit shall be complied with subject to review and
approval by the Community Development Department.
(1) 1.3 Approval shall remain valid for as long as the Encroachment Permit is
valid. Upon termination or expiration of the Encroachment Permit or upon
the failure of Grantee to install the facility within 180 days of its approval,
the approval for the facility shall become null and void and the facility shall
be removed within thirty (30) days from such termination or expiration. At
the time of removal, restoration of the area is required. Time extensions
may be considered if a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and
returning to the Community Development Department a notarized
"Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing
and recording with the County Clerk- Recorder a notarized "Notice of
Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval" form. The forms
shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and
evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development
Department.
(1) 1.5 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of
an administrative citation pursuant to Section 1162(a) of the Tustin City
Code.
SOURCE CODES
(1)
STANDARD CONDITION
(5)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS
(2)
CEQA MITIGATION
(6)
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
(3)
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE /S
(7)
PC /CC POLICY
(4)
DESIGN REVIEW
***
EXCEPTIONS
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235 A
Page 2
(1) 1.6 The applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants,
from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the
City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside,
challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning
Commission, or any other decision - making body, including staff, concerning
this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such
claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of
any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to
participate in defense of any such action under this condition.
(1) 1.7 The Community Development Department may review the project
annually or more often to ensure that the project is in compliance with the
conditions of approval contained herein. The Community Development
Director may initiate proceedings to amend or revoke this approval if the
project does not comply with the conditions of approval.
(1) 1.8 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any
necessary code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the
applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City
Council by ordinance.
(1) 1.9 The applicant shall provide a 24 -hour phone number to which problems may
be reported. To ensure continuity on all issues, the name, telephone
number, fax number, and e-mail address of a "single point of contact" in its
Engineering and Maintenance Departments shall be provided to the City's
designated representative upon activation of each facility.
USE RESTRICTIONS
(1) 2.1 A total of 25 flush - mounted underground utility cabinets are approved to be
installed and operated. All cabinets shall be located as depicted in the
approved building permit or encroachment permit plans.
(1) 2.2 No trees on public property shall be removed to accommodate the project,
unless replaced or relocated. The applicant shall make a note to this
effect on the encroachment and /or building permit plans.
(1) 2.3 The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any required approvals or
clearances from any applicable easement holders for work in any easement
areas.
(1) 2.4 The underground equipment shall be regularly maintained and inspected for
safety by the applicant in accordance with the approved plans.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235 A
Page 3
(1) 2.5 The flush- mounted access hatch shall not bear any signs or advertising
devices (other than certification, warning, or other required seals or
signage).
(1) 2.6 At building permit or encroachment permit plan check, the applicant shall
submit a plan identifying hardscape, landscape, and other improvements
that will be removed and /or replaced under the proposed plan.
(1) 2.7 Prior to issuance of building permits for facilities on private property, the
applicant shall obtain approval from the property owner. The project plans
shall make reference to the agreement.
(1) 2.8 Any removal of landscaping necessary to install the equipment shall be
replaced with landscaping materials similar in number, type, and size as
approved by the Directors of Community Development and Public Works.
(1) 2.9 At least thirty (30) days prior to installation, the utility provider shall provide
notification to adjacent property owners within a one hundred (100) foot
radius indicating the type, location, and size of the equipment that will be
installed, and the estimated start and ending dates of construction.
(1) 2.10 The applicant shall evaluate all requests for co- location on each facility by
additional provider(s) and make a good -faith determination of each such
requesting provider's compatibility with the applicant at this location. If, in
the good -faith determination of the applicant, the co- location is technically
compatible, then the applicant shall accommodate such additional provider if
applicable business terms can be successfully negotiated. All requests for
co- location shall be reviewed and approved by the City and may require a
license agreement.
NOISE
(1) 3.1 All construction operations including engine warm up, delivery, and
loading /unloading of equipment and materials shall be subject to the
provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance, as amended, and may take
place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday and 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Saturday unless the Building Official
determines that said activity will be in substantial conformance with the
Noise Ordinance and the public health and safety will not be impaired
subject to application being made at the time the permit for the work is
awarded or during progress of the work.
(1) 3.2 Noise emanating from the equipment, if any, shall not exceed the City's
Noise Ordinance.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 4235 A
Page 4
BUILDING DIVISION
(1) 4.1 Vaults not in the public right -of -way require building permits. At the time of
building permit application, the plans shall comply with the latest edition of
the building codes, City Ordinances, State laws, Federal laws, and
regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(1) 5.1 Prior to any work in the public right -of -way (within City parks and within
any public streets), an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from and
applicable fees paid to the Public Works Department.
(1) 5.2 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit for construction within the
public right -of -way, a 24" x 36" construction area traffic control plan, as
prepared by a California Registered Traffic Engineer, or Civil Engineer
experienced in this type of plan preparation, shall be prepared and
submitted to the Public Works Department for approval.
(1) 5.3 Any damage done to existing landscape, irrigation, pedestrian walkways,
parking, and /or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Director
of Parks and Recreation and the City Engineer.
FEES
(1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits or encroachment permits,
payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to,
the following. Payments shall be required based upon those rates in
effect at the time of payment and are subject to change.
a. All applicable Building and Planning plan check and permit fees, and
encroachment permit fees shall be paid to the City of Tustin.
b. Within forty -eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a
CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty -eight
(48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above -noted check, the statute of
limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.