The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06 JW AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTSAgenda Item 6 Reviewed: AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Directorx MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2014 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPME=NT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT- JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the third quarter of 2013. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 10N), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters during this third quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the third quarter were below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council rece;ve and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to continually work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concem, in this instance, airport traffic and noise. JWA Noise Report February 4, 2014 Page 2 DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2013, which includes the months of July through September. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels, and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during jet takeoffs and landings primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes; non - scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the third quarter of 2013, the average CNE_L at Tustin's monitoring station on Beneta Way was 54.85 dB. This is 1.3 dB lower than the average of the previous quarter (April through June 2013). For comparison, last year in the third quarter of 2012 the dB level was measurably similar at 54.9 dB. Figure 2 provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the third quarter of 2013. It is apparent that the noise levels in Tustin are consistently below the average City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNE:L, with the month of September displaying the lowest numbers overall. Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin - July through September 2013 70 60 40 J W u 30 20 — - -- - — 10 0 EVE 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Date Figure 2 July AuLust September Noise Impact Area level (65 dB) JWA Noise Report February 4, 2014 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County monitoring area, noise complaints increased by 42.2 percent during the third quarter of 2013 in comparison to the second quarter. During the third quarter of 2013, there were twelve (12) Tustin area complaint calls, compared to t ero (0) and three (3) complaints during the first and second quarters of 201:3 respectively. This increasing trend is typically seen during the spring and summer months when the weather is generally warmer, windows are often left open, people spend more time outside, and therefore aircraft noise may be more noticeable. Tustin staff has outreached to John Wayne Airport to gather further details on the nature of the complaints made by residents. The breakdown of the twelve (12) complaints from the third quarter of 2013 are as follows: six (6) of the complaints were due to aircraft flying low and loud; four (4) complaints were made due to general loud engine noise; one (1) complaint was made due to noise during the night or early morning; and, one (1) complaint was made due to an aircraft which appeared off - course. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five years is displayed below (Figure 3). Generally, there is a noticeable increase in noise complaints during either the second or third quarters, which further supports the theory that the increase in complaints tends to occur during the warmer months of spring and summer. Overall, the number of complaints has not reached more than thirty (30) complaints in a single quarter since 2009. N M c .M a d 2 Z 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Noise Complaints - Tustin e e e e ootioIS lc1ati I.i 6titiotiti 0 titi e 00 �,T`te`7\�`T�,T�,T,T�`T a �\T 0 9 69 0\te`T�,T a a a a a a a 0 a a a a c& ? a a 0 a Quarter /Year Figure 3 JWA Noise Report February 4, 2014 Page 4 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in John Wayne Airport's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next meeting will be on March 12, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. in the John Wayne Airport Administrative Office located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. Adrianne DiLeva- Johnson Sr. Management Assistant Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2013 through September :.0, 2013 JWA Noise Report February 4, 2014 Page 5 ATTACHMENT John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 (Third Quarter) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 163rd Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective Janwiry 1, 1986, the cri teria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California Staie Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. }birch St., Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -5S: 324/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -7S- 113I Back Bay Drive. Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -1 ON: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure l shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2012 - September 30, 2013). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre -Greve ASSaci,Ltes, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acrea,es, number of residences and estimated number of people within tlfe "Noise Impact Area ". JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT Noise Monitoring Stations (NMS) Location Ma �M -z- ir: `�4��.��i. * r `� � ~�� rQR� .. +r{ k.' ` > t `7 O � ''� 4 •+ i{ � "t .�j'x ::' J IL �1 �• ,+�r k` Y is "� 1s Aa Or volJ yam• � •r.4ti .( �' `f� X` yr. + /r . f {f•r ` r= i}} �` w •.. ' ' �► }�,� ,+ t 4O. .,�• �'l�� ' '' .J � n ► i , a• 0 a`�� 4 ��1 � rVIL lb { + .r ��w,� t v� �� ,� . ,a3 �• � "s•�w'\fV � �C��,'- �'•~► i f �.\S� a��r ,x; v •��/ i�ti �� rat. w * •} �i ,rbrr y }}+ bp � f � . ;� {..•S� �l �r:.��' � �wti.,'S l�� 'v�'•R��, J ]rw` •1�,� ti •� ~�. 4 ��`, +5' '� r r' '''y �` . ►� j��w 'S. r :��r. J � Kl r � �� %,i .�;r ]� i -'- '" ; - _art �' ' � �,ti'."'• { ,� - ` : � "'' !' •,,,, o~ mil' i �'�, i AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational cot. nt histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July - Septempber 2013 Period Air Carriers GA Jet (l) Total Operations (2) Average Daily Jet Operations Jet Prop July 7,360 0 2,060 21,867 303 August 7,31- -, 0 2,300 21,655 310 September 6,841 01 1,982 20,589 294 Third Quarter 21,519 0 6,342 64,111 302 Twelve Months 10/01112 - 09/30i 13 84,596 0 24,215 250,762 298 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE E DIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CN1:L values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by " ifN, A" entries in each table. Avera ,ze Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eichteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy -one dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (July 1 2013 - September 30 2013 The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, the O,'`ice received 428 complaints from local citizens. This is a 42.2% increase from the 301 complaints received last quarter. It is a 0.2% decrease from the 429 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. ME Unl nown Villa Par]. Westcliff l~IGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY o iA 20 30 40 5D oo 70 80 190 luo Number of Complaints Note- 96 complaints from Mission Vir jo were From one household. .g. Balboa Island Balboa Peninsula Corona Del Mar Costa Mesa Cowan Heights Eastbluff Fullerton Garden Grove Harbor Cove Huntington Beach Irvine Laguna Beach Laguna Niguel � Labe Forest Lemon Hts o Lido Isle U Mission Viejo N. Tustin Newport Beach Newport Coast Orange San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Santa Ana Heights Silverado Tustin Unl nown Villa Par]. Westcliff l~IGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY o iA 20 30 40 5D oo 70 80 190 luo Number of Complaints Note- 96 complaints from Mission Vir jo were From one household. .g. TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10.01 /12 through 09.30:13 Values in db at Each Site Penod NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Oct 2012 66.1 65.2 64.7 57.5 56.9 58.8 54.8 67.0 45.0 55.2 . Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Nov 2012 66.2 65.4 64.6 57.6 57.1 58.5 54.8 67.1 44.3 55.2 Days 27 30 301 30 301 30 30 30 27 30 Dec 2012 66.0 65.1 64.4 57.6 57.3 58.9 55.3 66.8 44.7 55.2 Days 31 30 31 31 31 30 9 31 29 31 Q4 2012 66.1 65.2 64.6 57.6 57.1 58.7 54.9 67.0 44.7 55.2 Days 89 91 92 92 92 91 70 92 87 92 Jan 2013 65.0 64.1 63.6 56.6 56.1 58.1 53.3 65.4 44.7 52.9 # Days 31 29 31 28 31 31 �9 31 30 31 Feb 2013 65.2 64.5 63.8 57.1 56.5 58.3 54.5 66.2 42.7 54.6 # Days 2�, 2fi 28 28 2� 28 28 28 27 28 Mar 2013 65.7 65.0 64.0 57.6 56.9 58.4 54.6 67.1 41.6 55.7 # Days 31 3I 31 31 %1 31 31 31 28 31 Q -12013 65.3 64.6 63.8 57.1 56.5 58.3 54.2 663 43.2 54.5 Days 90 88 90 87 90 90 88 90 85 90 Apr 2013 65.7 64.9 64.3 57.7 57.2 5t,.5 54.9 67.1 43.2 55.7 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 May 2013 65.9 65.2 64.5 58.0 57.3 58.5 55.2 67.3 43.3 55.7 Days ,1 31 it 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Jun 2013 66.8 65.9 65.1 5. -.0 57.6 : + ,,.9 55.1 67.7 43.5 56.2 # Days 30 40 30 26 �O 30 30 30 26 30 Q -2 2013 66.2 653 64.6 57.9 57.4 58.6 55.0 67A 433 55.9 # Days 91 91 91 87 91 91 91 91 80 91 Jul 2013 66.6 65.8 65.1 57.9 5'., 58.6 54.7 67.6 43.1 55.4 # Days 3I 31 31 31 31 31 .1 31 30 31 Aug 2013 66.5 65.8 65.0 57.7 56.9 58.4 54.3 67.5 43.4 55.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 } 1 31 31 31 311 31 Sep 2013 66.0 65.3 64.3 57.2 56.5 57.8 54.1 66.8 43.8 52.5 Days ;Q 30 30 2' 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q -3 2013 66A 1 65.6 64.8 57.6 57.0 583 54.4 67.3 43.4 54.6 # Days 92 92 92 84 92 92 92 92 89 92 Q4 201 thru Q -3 2013 Total 1 66.0 65.2 64.5 57.6 57.0 58.5 54.6 67.0 43.7 55.1 Days 362 362 3651 3501 365 364 341 365 341 365 Q -3 2012 thru Q -1 2013 (Prey-'ow, 4 Quarters) Total 66.1 65.3 64.6 57.6 57.1 58.6 54.7 67.0 443 55.2 Days 359 362 365 358 365 364 3411 365 337 364 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.01 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.11 0.0 -0.6 -0.1 -6- TABLES DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2013 Date NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ]ON 1 67.4 66.3 65.8 58.2 57.3 58.9 54.5 68.0 48.6 55.3 2 66.3 65.4 64.9 57.7 57.4 58.3 54.8 67.0 45.7 55.0 3 67.0 66.1 65.5 57.9 57.8 59.0 54.8 68.4 33.0 55.5 4 64.2 63.2 62.2 55.0 54.4 55.6 53.0 64.4 47.3 52.2 5 65.71 64.8 64.0 57.5 56.8 57.9 53.7 66.4 37.6 54.8 6 65.4 64.4 63.4 56.1 55.9 57.2 52.0 66.8 33.2 54.4 7 67.1 66.2 65.7 58.1 58.0 59.1 55.3 68.5 34.9 55.5 8 67.2 66.2 65.3 57.31 57.8 58.61 54.7 67.5 46.91 57.9 9 67.1 66.0 65.1 58.2 57.5 58.6 54.4 67.8 42.7 55.9 101 67.2 65.8 65.3 58.9 57.6 59.1 55.0 67.3 38.8 55.2 11 67.6 66.4 66.1 59.2 58.2 59.7 55.8 67.8 47.4 55.8 12 67.0 66.0 65.4 57.9 57.8 58.9 55.1 68.3 40.1 56.5 13 65.3 64.4 63.6 55.91 55.7 56.81 52.6 66.4 #N!Al 54.1 14 66.6 65.7 64.8 57.7 57.1 58.2 54.5 67.8 44.9 55.4 15 67.2 66.4 65.9 58.2 58.5 59.5 55.2 67.7 42.0 54.5 16 66.7 65.8 65.1 57.7 57.6 58.9 54.5 67.7 42.7 55.4 17 66.7 66.0 65.6 57.7 57.8 58.5 54.6 67.5 44.9 54.2 18 66.8 66.2 65.6 58.4 57.9 58.9 54.9 67.5 33.8 56.2 19 67.3 66.3 65.8 58.6 57.6 58.8 55.1 67.8 34.6 55.8 20 65.1 64.2 63.7 56.4 55.7 56.9 52.9 66.2 42.8 54.6 21 66.7 65.8 65.1 58.2 57.2 58.7 54.9 67.7 39.8 55.0 22 66.6 66.0 65.0 58.2 57.9 59.0 55.4 67.7 46.2 54.7 23 66.3 66.0 65.0 57.7 57.8 58.4 54.9 67.7 48.2 55.0 24 66.4 66.3 65.4 58.1 58.2 59.1 55.7 68.0 35.9 56.1 25 67.0 66.6 65.8 58.5 58.2 59.4 55.5 68.2 30.8 55.4 26 66.9 66.2 65.6 58.71 58.2 59.41 56.0 67.9 41.61 55.3 27 64.9 64.2 63.4 56.1 55.5 56.9 52.9 67.0 38.6 54.2 28 66.4 65.6 65.1 57.8 57.2 58.3 54.4 68.4 38.8 56.7 29 66.5 65.7 65.0 58.5 58.0 59.3 55.7 67.8 37.9 55.5 30 66.6 66.2 65.2 58.3 58.2 59.1 55.6 67.8 38.5 55.7 31 66.6 66.2 65.2 58.21 58.11 58.91 55.31 68.21 37.11 56.9 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 En. Avg 66.6 65.8 65.1 57.9 57.5 58.6 54.7 67.6 43.11 55.4 #N A indicates insufficient data. •7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUE S AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2013 Date NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 66.8 66.2 65.7 58.6 58.3 59.5 55.8 68.1 41.2 56.1 2 66.6 66.0 65.2 58.7 57.8 59.2 55.1 68.3 40.7 56.2 3 65.2 64.4 63.7 56.7 56.4 57.4 53.5 66.2 41.3 54.1 4 66.5 65.8 64.8 57.81 57.7 58.7 54.5 68.0 46.11 54.9 5 66-51 65.9 64.9 57.2 57.0 57.5 53.8 68.2 37.11 55.0 6 66.7 66.1 65.1 58.4 57.9 58.9 54.7 68.0 38.1 55.7 7 66.5 66.0 65.6 58.1 57.8 58.9 54.5 67.7 42.4 55.7 8 67.4 66.5 65.6 58.4 58.1 59.3 55.5 68.3 34.7 55.6 4 67.0 66.2 65.4 58.61 58.2 59.11 55.7 68.2 38.7 55.6 10 65.4 64.7 63.8 57.0 56.4 57.3 53.7 65.71 40.5 53.5 11 66.5 65.9 65.2 58.4 57.8 59.4 55.9 67.9 43.7 55.7 I2 66.9 66.0 65.3 58.1 57.6 58.8 54.7 68.3 43.6 56.7 13 66.9 66.1 65.3 57.7 56.8 58.6 53.9 68.0 40.3 56.2 14 66.7 659 65.2 57.61 56.7 58.31 53.1 67.5 32.8 57.2 15 67.1 66.2 65.7 58.1 56.9 58.9 54.2 68.3 41-31 56.5 16 66.9 66.2 65.5 58.0 56.8 58.4 54.6 67.8 46.71 55.0 17 65.0 64.5 63.5 55.4 55.1 56.2 52.3 65.4 30.0 54.1 18 66.9 65.9 65.6 58.8 57.3 59.3 55.3 67.9 46.3 55.0 19 66.7 66.0 65.41 57.9 56.8 59.2 53.7 67.9 36.6 56. 20 66.5 66.1 65.0 56.2 56.7 58.1 53.8 67.3 48.0 54. 21 67.2 66.5 65.9 58.4 57.1 58.7 54.1 67.5 44.91 55.7 22 67.3 66.7 66.0 57.7 56.9 58.9 54.0 67.6 43-81 56.5 23 66.9 66.1 65.0 57.8 56.7 58.3 54.6 67.7 40.8 55.5 24 64.7 64.0 63.2 55.7 54.4 56,2 51.7 65.2 39.9 54.1 25 66.1 65.4 64.5 57.0 55.6 57.5 53.4 68.2 43.6 55.5 26 66.6 65.6 64.8 57.7 56.2 58.1 54.2 67.0 40.6 54.1 27 66.5 65.9 64.7 57.3 56.3 58.0 54.4 66.3 44.01 54.2 28 66.7 66.2 65.1 57.I 56.4 57.9 54.5 66.5 48.3 53.9 29 67.4 66.5 65.5 57.4 56.6 58.7 54.6 67.7 45.6 55.1 30 66.5 65.6 64.6 58.0 55.8 58.0 54.6 67.2 48.5 54.2 31 64.4 63.4 62.5 55.3 54.2 55.7 51.7 63.6 38.6 50.8 Days 31 31 3I 31 31 aj 31 3I 31 31 En. Avg 66.5 65.9 65.0 57.7 56.91 58.4 X43 67.51 43.4 55.3 #NIA indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLES DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2013 Date NMS Site 1S I 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N I ION 1 63.6 62.9 61.8 54.5 54.2 55.2 51.7 64.4 37.2 51.1 2 66.6 65.9 65.3 57.0 56.7 58.5 54.5 67.1 43.2 54.1 3 66.6 65.9 65.1 #N /A 56.3 57.8 54.0 66.3 40.4 53.7 4 66.2 65.6 64.5 #N/Al 55.8 57.1 53.1 65.9 47.5 53.1 5 66.51 65.6 64.4 #N/Al 55.7 57.4 53.4 66.6 47.11 53.8 6 66.3 65.3 63.8 #N'A 55.4 57.3 53.7 66.6 44.81 54.9 7 64.0 63.0 61.8 `J/A 53.2 55.3 51.6 64.2 42.6 51.4 8 66.3 65.6 64.7 /A 55.9 57.4 53.9 67.2 46.3 54.4 9 66.6 66.0 64.6 rN /A 56.7 58.11 54.1 67.3 45.5 54.9 10 66.0 65.4 64.4 #N.'A 56.9 58.5 54.7 67.3 39.4 53.1 11 65.9 65.5 64.1 57.6 57.3 58.2 54.2 67.4 42.11 52.8 12 67.2 66.8 65.7 57.9 58.2 59.0 54.9 67.5 48.8 50.3 13 66.6 66.0 64.9 57.4 57.0 58.3 54.6 67.2 43.5 51.1 14 63.9 63.2 6'�--. 54.71 54.3 55.71 5I.5 63.6 41.2 48.7 15 66.3 65.8 65.1 56.6 56.6 57.5 53.9 67.1 43.7 51.0 16 66.1 65.5 64.6 57.0 56.9 57.8 54.4 67.1 44.01 52.0 17 65.8 65.4 64.0 57.5 56.2 57.6 54.3 67.4 40.51 52.8 18 66.3 65.7 64.7 58.5 57.6 59.3 55.5 67.3 39.3 51.5 19 67.5 66.7 66.0 59.21 58.4 59.71 56.1 68.2 #N /A 54.8 20 66.7 66.0 64.9 58.31 57.3 58.61 53.5 68.2 29.5 55.1 21 64.3 63.7 62.4 55.7 55.8 56.5 53.8 64.5 #N /A 50.2 22 66.4 65.9 64.7 58.1 57.7 58.7 55.6 67.61 41.7 52.4 23 66.2 65.6 64.7 57.3 56.7 57.7 54.3 67.5 47.3 50.3 24 65.1 64.9 63.3 56.2 56.2 56.7 53.9 66.7 42.9 51.0 25 66.3 65.0 64.4 58.91 57.I 58.81 54.6 67.9 38.8 54.3 26 66.2 65.8 64.4 58.1 57.7 58.9 55.7 67.9 37.51 52.8 27 65.5 65.1 63.6 56.5 56.3 58.0 54.2 67.0 44.5 50.0 28 60.5 59.1 59.7 51.5 51.8 54.4 48.5 63.6 44.8 45.4 29 66.0 65.4 64.4 56.9 56.7 57.3 54.0 66.7 36.7 50.0 30 66.2 65.6 64.5 57.0 56.8 57.71 54.6 67.1 45.5 51.7 Days 30 30 30 22 30 30 30 30 28 30 En. Avg 66.0 65.3 64.3 57.8 54.1 66.81 43.81 52.5 #N::A indicates insufficient data. ILM TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July - Septempber 2013 Camer AC Type Deps 1tiM5Site 14 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Alasks Air B734 7 Average 97.0 95.8 96.8 89.4 90.2 90.8 87.0 #NIA #N .'A 1PN .7 Count (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (0) (0) (0) B737 661 Average 92.3 92.0 88.8 81.5 83.3 83.9 80.5 92.3 77.9 #NfA Count (650 ) (653) (655) (634) (655) (652) (644) (4) (2) (0) 5738 224 Average 98.0 97.0 96.8 87.9 88.5 88.81 85.1 95.3 #NfA #NfA Count (223) (221) (223) (2DO) (222) (224) (216) (1) (0) (0) American B738 1103 Average 98.4 97.2 96.6 88.2 88.0 88.9 85.3 94.3 80.1 78.4 Count (1083) (1075) (1084) (980) (1088) (1069) (1066) (6) (8) (4) Delta A319 427 Average 94.7 94.0 93.6 86.2 85.2 85.9 81.5 92.6 80.9 81.4 Count (413) (413) (416) (387) (417) (411) (404) (9) (4) (2) A320 I Average 93.7 92.5 92.1 86.5 85.1 86.8 80.6 #NfA #M-A #N -A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) B73.3 2 Average 95.0 93.6 92.6 87.1 86.1 88.1 85.2 #N'A ;WA #NfA Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) :752 287 Average 95.8 94.8 94.2 86.8 86.0 86.9 83.0 93.6 78.1 82.1 Count (276) (275) (279) (257) (779) (274) (276) (5) (1) (2) FedEx A. O6 64 Average 97.2 96.8 94.6 88.5 88.0 89.7 85.7 #N'A #N. -A tJN ?A Count (64) (64) (64) (59) (62) (63) (64) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A319 326 Average 94.0 93.3 92.7 85.6 85.2 86.1 81.8 91.2 76.1 #N. -A Count (324) (320) (324) (307) (324) (320) (315) (2) (1) (0) Interjct A320 184 Average 95.0 93.9 92.9 86.3 85.3 86.6 82.7 #N!A #N. -A #N. +A Ccunt (182) (183) (184) (172} (163) (184} (174) (0) (0) (0) Mesa Airlines CRI) 42 Average 91.4 90.3 92.2 83.2 84.6 85.1 79.6 #N.-'A #NIA 3dN!A Count (42) (42) (42) (41) (42) (42) (38) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B733 I Average 89.7 89.1 89.4 85.2 82.6 84.5 81.4 #N.-'A #N. +A #N A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) B731 1692 Average 91.4 91.0 89.5 83.8 833 84.6 81.5 92.4 79.8 77.8 Count 1 (1672) (1667) (1678) (1637) (1679) (1667) (1605) (7) (5) (1) 01 8 49 Average 92.7 92.0 89.1 83.1 82.0 84.1 81.3 92.4 82.3 #N A Count (47) (47) (47) (44) (46) (47) (46) (2) (1) (0) United A. 20 735 Average 92.2 91.6 91.0 84.8 84.1 85.3 81.3 93.0 79.1 80.0 Count (721) (717) (727) (696) (729) (720) (675) (4) (1) (1) 8737 516 Average 95.3 94.4 92.8 85.0 84.7 85.6 82.3 93.3 79.3 80.2 Count (508) (509) (511) (469) (510) (504) (508) (3) (4) (2) 13738 199 Average 95.9 94.8 92.4 84.9 83.8 84.8 81.9 94.8 79.0 #N. .'A Count (192) (192) (190) (1 ?6) (192) (189) (187) (5) (4) (0) B7 2 286 Average 94.7 93.9 93.2 86.8 85.6 86.9 82.7 91.9 77.1 81.3 Count (276) (276) (278) (257) (277) (273) (270) (8) (3) (1) Up.� B -5.'. 51 Average 95.7 95.5 93.4 86.2 85.6 86.4 81.3 #N;'A #N:'A #N A Count (51) (51) (51) (46) (51) (51) (50) (0) (0) (0) US Airway Aj 1 38 Average 92.8 92.2 90.2 84.0 83.4 84.0 80.5 #N.:A #N.-'A #N- A Count (38) (38) (38) (38) (38) (39) (32) (0) (0) (0) A320 230 Average 93.3 92.8 90.7 84.2 83.6 84.4 80.4 89.5 #N.-'A #N.- A Count (228) (223) (226) (215) (227) (223) (220) (2) (0) (0) A +21 178 Average 98.1 97.5 95.4 86.9 85.9 86.6 83.2 90.6 79.7 #NIA Count (175) (173) (176) (166) (176) (175) (174) (1) (1) (0) P) 152 2 Average 93.9 94.1 90.0 82.9 81.7 84.7 81.2 #NfA #NIA #N.� A Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) Wesdet 4 e 37 92 Average 94.6 93.7 94.2 87.5 87.1 87.7 82.3 #N +A #N. -A #NIA Count (91) (90) (92) (87) (92) (89) (87) (0) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 ME-%SURtD AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE Lt VI LS Commercial Clams E July - Septempber 2013 Carrier AC Type Deps NMS Site Is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N �'N ION SkyW� A Co .1. CRJ9 270 Average Count 90.1 (266) 88.9 (264) 88.3 (267) 78.9 (154) 78.4 (132) 82.2 (267) 78.9 (212) 41.1 (3) :NA (0) N A (0) �)DUthwro 237 .1847 Average bunt 89.9 (2834) 89.7 (2800) 88.3 (2826) 83.4 (2758) 82.4 (2831) 83,7 (2806) 80.7 (2739) 151.1 (9) , <k (1) '� A (0} TABLE 8 NIFASURi'D AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July - Septempber 2013 Corner AC Type Dep . NMS Site 15 2S 3S 4S SS 6S 7S 8N 9N ION kyWest CL60 2 Average Count 82.7 (2) 52.4 (2) 83.2 (2) #N. -A (0) ALN.'A (0) 78.1 (1) ;iN,'A (0) WA (0) 0N. -A (0) P N A (0) k .j 7 237 verage Count 87.7 (230) 87.3 (231) 86.7 (234) 79.3 (105) 79.5 (I *�) 80.8 (229) 78.7 (159) 89.7 (,') -rN. A (0) ;NA (0) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July - Seplempber2013 Carrier At ype 0 Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N l0N General Aviation Jet 3020 Average Count 88.1 (2821) 86.9 (2788) 89.1 (2778) 82.5 (1338) 82.1 (1023) 82.2 (2384) 82.1 (594) 86.5 (42) 80.6 (3) 912 (.3) _fit_ TABLC 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY CamLr AL . ypL Year 2010 2011 1 01 AirCdoada AC A319 340 4 E190 52 Ala,yk.t A:r AS B734 163 152 110 84 51 B737 6,687 6,839 7,435 6,238 4,249 B738 1,198 8931 761 942 880 Amcwwan AA B738 7,744 7.4931 7,208 7,6671 6355 B752 1,722 1,999 1,519 911 MD82 10 4 " Compass CP E170 ontinenlal W B735 2 B737 4,239 4,646 4,124 B738 855 1,1901 1,163 Ddfa DL A319 3,9031 5,348 3,436 2,531 A320 372 36 31 14 8737 L707 3,082 3,373 1,860 II 8738 688 433 87 55 14 B752 1,539 362 45 1,073 1,672 MD90 1,745 371 FadEx FM A306 369 500 506 508 380 310 141 4 2 2 2 i L. AWF Airli►rs F9 A318 233 284 88 369 17 A319 2,616 2,596 2,751 2,368 1,775 A320 6 2 Into 'let 40 A320 346 1.110 Mesa Airlines YV CR.19 2.533 1,437 720 626 418 Northwest NW A319 2,255 162 A320 21 4 Sk West Comi. SC CR.19 584 1,539 Southwest Wei B733 2 4 2 B737 30.058 30,986 31,187 33,490 26,809 B738 1 132 227 United UA A319 j,741 1,900 1,931 2,133 1,940 A320 2,798 4,053 4,419 4,554 3,598 B733 441 8735 379 l 973? 447 3.786 2,801 B738 1 77 1,407 775 9739 2 B752 2,071 1,482 916 1,039 908 t:PS 5X B752 434 416 420 414 306 US A1,11v ys AW A319 3.290 783 1,152 2.442 1,643 320 2,270 1.333 1,086 1.485 669 321 77 4441 586 247 561 B733 988 1,632 1,349 8752 472 28 32 8 6 Virgin Anw&a VX A319 1,266 104 A320 773 962 Wesoct WS B737 7661 1,0031 546 Total ?3.1.527 1 81,241 1 79,658 1 80,6911 62,009 TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 A306 369 500 506 508 380 A310 141 4 2 2 2 A318 233 X84 88 369 17 A319 t 1,168 9,788 11,186 10.379 7,889 A320 5,862 6,724 5,547 6,418 5,391 A321 77 444 586 247 561 B733 1,431 1,632 1,353 2 B734 163 152 110 84 51 B735 381 1 B737 1 2,691 45,5531 47,332 46,467 34,416 B738 i 0,485 10,009 9,296 10,203 8,451 B739 2 B752 6,238 4,287 2,932 3,445 2,892 CRJ9 2,533 1,437 720 1,210 1,957 E170 1,352 E190 52 MD82 l0 4 4 MD90 1,745 371 Total 83,527 81,241 79,658 1 80,691 62,009 - 13- TABLE I I AIR CARRL- R AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE H[STORY wrrlc7 A[ Year 2009 2010 2011 2012 Air Canada AC A319 .466 M5 E190 .07P Alaska Air AS 8734 .222 .151 .115 .071 8737 9.159 9.3 ?3 10.178 8.527 5.825 B738 1.644 1-225, 1.049 1.284 1.200 Ar,mril.l:} AA 8738 10,605 10.266 9.877 10.484 8.981 8752 2,359 2,737 87 1235 MD82 .01 " .005 Compass CP E170 1,847 .ontinental CO B735 .003 B737 5.778 6,3421 5.649 B738 1.197 1.652 1.597 Mi , DL A319 5.353 7.321 4.699 3.468 A320 .504 .055 .041 .019 B737 2.340 4.219 4.627 2.538 .016 B738 .940 .597 _115 .079 .019 B752 2.107 .499 ,063 1.462 2 290 MD90 2.395 .510 FedEx FM A306 .507 .685 .693 .694 .521 7310 .192 ,005 .003 .003 .003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 .318 389 .0 .503 .025 A319 1.584 7. =F 3.770 3.235 2.430 A320 .008 _003 Into et 40 A320 .473 1,521 Mesa Airlines YV CRJ9 1.466 1.9. _986 .855 .573 Northwest NW A3119 1.088 2:'' A320 .030 Sk West Coml, SC CRJ9 $QI 2.107 Southwest WN 13733 .003 .005 .003 B737 41.189 42.466 42.737 45.770 36.729 8738 1 .280 .312 d UA A319 2.392 ?._605 2.627 2.910 2.663 A320 3.825 5.553 6.077 6.240 4.934 B733 611 B735 .5t5 E737 .608 5.178 3.833 B738 1 .110 1,921 1.063 B739 ,003 8752 2.836 2.033 1.252 1,418 1.238 UPS SX B752 .595 .570 .575 .566 .419 US Airways AW A319 1507 1.071 1.575 3.331 2.249 A320 1.110 1.819 1.488 2,025 .921 A321 .104 .805 .344 .767 B733 1.353 2 1.849 B752 .647 .03h .044 .011 .008 V ei America VX A319 1.734 ,142 A320 1.058 1.318 %4-es:let W5 B737 1.049 1,492 .748 Total 114.422 1 111,329 1 109.153 1 110270 1 84.956 -14- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING No meeting was held as there were no attendees from the community. Elm