Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 STANDARD PACIFIC CORP.AGENDA REPOR Agenda Item Reviewed. City Manager Finance Director ,� MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2014 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER FROM: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JOHN A. BUCHANAN, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA) 2013-003, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2013- 002, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17507, CONCEPT PLAN 2013-002, DESIGN REVIEW 2013-006, AND DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 13-03 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 375 HOMES WITHIN NEIGHBORHOOD G, MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN zw aim SUMMARY, The project is a request to construct 375 single family detached un,ts, a focal park, and other neighborhood amenit es. The site is locat d within Planning Area 15 (Neighborhood G) of the MCAS Tus.in Specific Plan and gems rally bounded by future Moffett Drive to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Warner Avenue off -ramp to Lhe south, and future Park Avenue to `he west. The proposed project requires approval of Specific Plan Amendment, Concept Plan Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Development Agreement, and Disposition and Developmen`_ Agreement. On December 10, 2013, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. =.'39 recommending that the C-ty Council approve the proposed projec.. APPLICANT: Standard Pacifc Corp. PROPERTY OWNER. City of Tustin 15360 Barranca Parkway 300 Centennial Way Irvine, CA 92618 Tustin, CA 92780 FISCAL IMPACT: The sources identified below are r-evenue sources identi.ied :o accrue to the City over the term of the project from commence to completion. 1. Sale of Land: $56,000,000 which wli be paid to the City upon conveyance to the Developer wh ch is ant,cipated in March 2014; howeve r, in no event later than July 31, -01{ . An 'independent third party appraisal was conducted by the City; the appraisal confirms that the property is being sold at Fair Market Va'ue. 2. Marketing Fee: At conveyance, the Developer will pay to the City a Tustin Legacy Master Marketing Program Fee of $50,000 which is used by the City for market;ng Tustin Legacy. This fee w,ll be paid at the close of escrow. 3. Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Obligation: $16,9:•4,704; the Developer's obl,gation will be received incrementally as building perm t} are issued to the Developer. The incremental distr.but.on to the City wll be accelerated to a lump sum payment by the City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 2 Developer if the City awards a contract and commences construction on the Peter's Canyon Channel. 4. Community Facilities Districts (CFD): The estimated bond capacity for Tax 'A' or the "Facilities Tax" is $23,900,000 of which the City's portion is estimated at $15,300,000 and TUSD's portion is estimated at $8,600,000; the Facilities Tax rate is 0.50 percent of the estimated property value. Tax 'B' or the "Services Tax ", for essential City services and facilities maintenance, is 0.15 percent of the estimated property value; this tax has been applied to projects within Tustin Legacy. The overall average property tax rate is estimated to not exceed 1.74 percent. 5. Profit Participation: The City will receive 50 percent of the amount by which the total Net Profits exceed 8.50 percent of the Gross Sales Price received by the Developer. Participation will be calculated at the completion of the project. 6. Property Tax Status: Currently the property is tax exempt because of City ownership. The property will lose its tax exempt status upon conveyance of the property to the Developer and will be taxed accordingly. 7. Transaction Costs: The City's transaction costs are borne by the Developer. 8. Entitlement Cost: The applicant has paid the required application fees for DA 2013 -003, SPA 2013 -002, TTM 17507, CP 2013 -002, DR 2013 -006, and DDA 13 -03. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: The proposed project furthers the objectives of the following Strategic Plan goals: • Goal A: Economic and Neighborhood Development — The proposed project enable business, development, and job opportunities and would enhance the vibrancy and quality of life in Tustin Legacy and other areas of the community. • Goal B: Public Safety and Protection of Assets — The proposed project would ensure Tustin is an attractive, safe and well maintained community in which people feel pride. The proposed project also furthers the following Mayor's Goals: • Implementation of Tustin Legacy New Vision Concept — The proposed project would be consistent with the implementation of the Tustin Legacy New Vision Concept. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt: 1. Resolution No. 1412, finding the project is within the scope of the certified Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the MCAS Tustin Reuse and Specific Plan, the Supplemental and Addendum, and that pursuant to Government Code Section 65457, no further environmental review is required; City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 3 2. Resolution No. 14-13, approving Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) 2013- 003 between the City of Tustin and Standard Pacific Corp for development of 375 residential units, a focal park and other community amenities; and, authorizing the City Manager to execute said DDA 2013 -03, subject to any non- substantive modifications as may be determined necessary and/or recommended by the City's special real estate counsel or the City Attorney and to carry out all City actions necessary to implement the DDA including execution of related documents as required by the DDA. 3. Introduce and have first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1440 for Specific Plan Amendment 2013 -002, an amendment to the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan to allow guest parking be provided on private local streets. 4. Introduce and have first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1441 for Development Agreement 2013 -003 to facilitate the development and conveyance of an approximate 78 acre site within the boundaries of MCAS Tustin specific plan. 5. Resolution No. 14-14, approving Concept plan 2013 -002 to develop 375 residential units and ensure necessary linkages are provided between the development project, the integrity of the specific plan and purpose and intent of the neighborhood is maintained, and applicable city requirements are identified and satisfied; Tentative Tract Map 17507 to subdivide an approximately 78 acre site into 376 numbered lots and 75 lettered lots; and Design Review 2013 -006 for the design and site layout of 375 single family detached units, a focal park, and other neighborhood amenities. APPROVAL AUTHORITY: • Specific Plan Amendment: Section 4.2.8 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan requires an amendment to the Specific Plan be initiated and processed in the same manner set forth in the Tustin City Code. Tustin City Code Section 9295 specifies any amendment to the Zoning may be initiated and adopted as other ordinances are amended or adopted. • Disposition and Development Agreement: In July 2012, the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with the Developer for land acquisition and development of approximately 238 single family homes, a neighborhood park, and open space on Disposition Parcel 1B. Subsequently, in February 2013 the ENA was amended expanding the area under negotiation from 51 acres to 78 acres through the inclusion of Parcel 6A. The single family homes were increased from 238 to 375 units. The amended ENA allowed for better planning south of Moffett Road and east of Park Avenue. The Standard Pacific Corporation and City of Tustin desire to enter into Disposition and Development Agreement 13 -03. • Development Agreement: The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Section 4.2.9 requires a Development Agreement in conjunction with or prior to approval of any entitlements associated with private development. Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9607, the Planning Commission shall City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 4 consider the Development Agreement and make a recommendation thereon to the City Council. The Planning Commission shall forward its recommendation to the City Council within thirty (30) days of the time specified for the public hearing. Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9613, after the City Council completes the public hearing and considers the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council may accept, modify or disapprove the Development Agreement. Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9614, the Development Agreement shall be approved by the adoption of an ordinance. Concept Plan: Section 4.2.2 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan requires a Concept Plan to be prepared and submitted for Zoning Administrator approval concurrent with a new development proposal. Since the proposal includes other entitlement applications that require City Council approval, Concept Plan 2013 -002 is forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council for concurrent consideration. Tentative Tract Map: Tustin City Code Section 93218 authorizes the Planning Commission to review and take action on Tentative Maps: however, since the proposal includes other entitlement applications that require City Council approval, Tentative Tract Map 17507 is forwarded to City Council for concurrent consideration. • Design Review: Section 4.2.4 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan requires each development to submit and obtain approval of a Site Plan and Design Review pursuant to the Tustin City Code following or concurrent with the approval of a Concept Plan. Tustin City Code Section 9272 authorizes the Community Development Director to consider Design Review application; however, since the proposal includes other entitlement applications that require City Council approval, DR 2013 -006 is forwarded to City Council for concurrent consideration. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Site Location The project site is approximately 78 acres located within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Tustin Legacy) boundaries affecting only Disposition Parcels 113 and 6A (Attachment A -- Location Map). The site is currently owned by the City and will be transferred to Standard Pacific Corp. upon execution of the DDA. The project site is bounded by future Moffett Drive to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Warner Avenue off -ramp to the south, and future Park Avenue to the west within Planning Area 15 of Neighborhood G, MCAS - Tustin Specific Plan (Figure 1). Surrounding uses include the St. Anton apartments and vacant site to the west, warehouse and light industrial uses to the south, residential uses across Jamboree Road to the east, and vacant sites to the north (Figure 2). City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 5 Figure 2 City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 6 Project Description Specific Plan Amendment 2013 -002, Disposition and Development Agreement 13 -03, Concept Plan 2013 -OOt, Design Review 2013 -006, Development Agreement 2013 -003, and Tentative Tract Map 17507 are real estate agreement and development applications for the purpose of developing 375 detached residential units, a focal park, and other amenities and open space linkages to other developments within the Tustin Legacy (Figure 3). The project has been designed to enhance livability by intergrading four (4) distinctive housing styles completely connected to a centralized park and greenbelt linkages. The four housing products are Sheldon, Crawford, Greenwood and Stafford (details are discussed under Design Review section of this report). The focal park will include a community plaza and will serve as a social gathering place for residents within the community as well as residents of the City as a whole. This is accomplished through the requirement that the focal park must be accessible via public easement to the public. At the southerly end of the focal park is the private recreation center that is anchored by the Club House building, swimming pool, water play areas as well as other amenities available to the residents of the community. Figure3 City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 7 Disposition and Development Agreement In 2010, the Tustin City Council approved the "Tustin Legacy Disposition Strategy for the Former Master Developer Footprint" for Neighborhoods B, D, E, and G. The Strategy grouped the site into "Disposition Packages" located adjacent to existing development and major infrastructure such as Tustin Ranch Road. The Strategy identified Early Opportunity sites including Disposition Package 1 B, as a single family residential development package. In July 2012, the City entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with the Developer for land acquisition and development of approximately 238 single family homes, a neighborhood park, and open space on Disposition Parcel 1 B. Subsequently, in February 2013 the ENA was amended expanding the area under negotiation from 51 acres to 78 acres through the inclusion of Parcel 6A. The single family homes were increased from 238 to 375 units. The amended ENA allowed for better planning south of Moffett Road and east of Park Avenue. In addition, it allowed for the acceleration of infrastructure construction throughout Tustin Legacy with the earlier than anticipated construction of Peter's Canyon Channel. Based on prior direction, the following principles were adhered to in the negotiation of the DDA: • The terms and conditions include performance measures required of the Developer such as construction commencement and completion dates. • The property will be conveyed to the Developer at not less than Fair Market Value. • The property will be conveyed to the Developer in an "as -is -where is -and with all faults" condition. • Development and construction of the project are at no cost or expense to the City. • The Developer will be responsible for paying Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program costs • The Developer will be responsible for local infrastructure costs. • The City will retain certain special rights associated with the maintenance of the property and easements associated with public access. • The City's risk, as the seller of property, is limited. • The City will retain certain rights and remedies in the event that the Developer fails to perform as specified in the DDA, including the revestment rights and the right to repurchase. The DDA requires the Developer to perform the following: • All on -site horizontal improvements (i.e., grading, utilities, and streets) will be completed within 24 months of grading permits being issued. • All Models for the four product types will be completed 6 months following the completion of horizontal improvements. • The project shall be completed within 60 months following Model home opening. Conveyance of the property, which is anticipated in March 2014, is dependent on the closing conditions. City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 8 • The Developer receiving a Development Agreement (DA) prior to or concurrent with City approval of the project. • The Developer or Developer's Affiliate successfully concludes their Due Diligence process with° n 60 days from the execution of the DDA. • The Developer provides a Financing Plan certifying the ability to develop the property as proposed in the DDA. • The Developer successfully receiving full entitlements to develop the Disposition Package 1 B and 6A as described in the DDA. The proposed development and DDA respond to all City objectives and goals established through the Request for Proposal process, the Disposition Strategy, the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the approved ENA. The financial commitments by the developer have been fully evaluated and the DDA protects the interests of the City. Resolution No. 14 -13 has been prepared in support of City Council consideration of DDA 13 -03, a copy of which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk, subject to any non- subs4antive modifications as may be determined necessary as may be approved by the City Manager's Office, or as recommended by the City's Special Counsel or the City Attorney. In addition, staff is also recommending that the City Manager be authorized to take such actions, and execute such documents and instruments, as deemed necessary or desirable to implement the terms of the DDA and all attachments to the DDA and other documents as necessary and, upon satisfaction of all conditions and obl'gations of the Developer thereto and pursuant to the DDA, to transfer the subject site to the Developer. Specific Plan Amendment — On- Street Guest Parking The proposed development consists of detached single family homes within a community. The Specific Plan requires 0.5 spaces of unassigned guest spaces per unit; however, Table 3 -4 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan only allows not more than fifty (50) percent of the guest parking spaces required may be fulfilled wth on- stree-L park-ng on private and public local streets, except where adjoining a publicly accessible park. The proposed project requires 188 guest parking spaces and provides 549 wth n a parking bay and on- street guest parking spaces (over three times of the required amount of guest parking). However, of the 549 spaces provided, only 94 spaces can be counted as meeting the required on- street guest spaces. The applicant has indicated that to provide the remaining 94 off - street parking in a parking lot setting within a single family neighborhood is not typical and may change the character of the neighborhood. Accordingly, the appl cant has proposed an amendment to the Specific Plan to allow guest parking be provided on private local streets. Exhibit B of Resolution No. 4239 provides the proposed text amendment language. Standard Required Provided Residents Parking 750 776 Guest Parkin - On Street 188 549 Parking Ratio Litasident PalLhA 21unit 2.07 1unit Parking Ratio Guest Parkin 0.51unit 1.461unit Focal Park On -Site - 25 Focal Park On- Street - 144 Total Par*ing Provided 938 1,494 City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 9 Concept Plan Section 4.2.2 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan requires a Concept Plan to be prepared and submitted for Zoning Administrator approval concurrent with a new development proposal. The Concept Plan will establish the planning and design principles guiding the implementation of site layout, landscaping, and architectural design on the site. The purpose of the Concept Plan is to document and ensure that: 1. The necessary I�nkages are provided between the development project and the Planning Area /Neighborhood in which it is located. 2. The integrity of the Specific Plan and purpose and intent of each Neighborhood is maintained. 3. Applicable considerations of City requirements other than those spelled out in the Specific Plan are identified and satisfied. Concept Plan 2013 -002 provides for conceptual development site layout and design framework for the proposed project. The Concept Plan includes: a conceptual site plan, a grading and util -ty plan; a phasing plan; and a landscape plan. As proposed, Concept Plan 2013 -002 has been prepared and submitted concurrently with the proposal to develop 375 residential units and necessary vehicular and pedestrian linkages. The integrity of the Specific Plan, along with applicable City requirements, have also been demonstrated through submitted plans (Figure 4 and 5). Conceptual Landscape Pedestrian Circulation Figure 4 Figure 5 Design Review Section 4.2.4 of the MCAS Tustn Specific Plan requires applicants for each development to submit and obtain approval of a Sate Plan and Design Review pursuant to the Tustin City Code following or concum,nt with the approval of a Concept Plan. Design Review 2013 -004 provides for the design and sise layout of the proposed re �idential community. City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 10 There are four housing products proposed with vanous arch tectural styles as follows: • Sheldon at Tustin Legacy: is the smallest home type and is bordered by the green belt park on the north, the Warner Avenue off -ramp on the south, the Cr-�wford and the Greenwood housing products to the east and Park Avenue to the west (blue shaded area on Figure 3). There are 103 homes ranging from 1,837 to 2,389 square feet and consist of 3 bedrooms 2.5 baths to 5 bedrooms 3 baths. The styles include Santa Barbara, Cottage, Monterey, and Craftsman Bungalow architectural designs. PLAN JXCO PLAN 49 •LAH 7XA11 54-1 +4! NV- -111 f aarta aa• *ua Pi An k PL +N P PLAN LAR ��.... -.. Sheldon at Tustin Legacy • Crawford at Tustin Legacy: is located in both the northwest corner of the community a� well as along the eastern boundary adjacent to Jamboree Roy -d and the Warner Avenue off -ramp (yellow shaded area on Figure 3). Crawford cons st} of 77 homes ranging in s ze from 2,419 to 2,711 square feet and configured with 4 bedrooms, loft, and 3 baths +o 4 bedrooms, bonus room (optional bedroom) and 3 baths. The architectural styles include Cottage, Monterey, Santa Barbara, American Classic, and Craftsman Bungalow J>a� N , Crawford at Tustin Legacy City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 11 Greenwood at Tustin Legacy: Greenwood consists of 99 homes ranging in sG -e from 2,945 to 3,515 square feet (green shaded area on Figure 3). The homes are configured with 4 bedrooms, loft, den and 3 baths to 5 bedrooms, kid's lounge and 5.5 baths. Each of the homes also has an optional bonus room and/or suite over the garage. A standard "Legacy Room," an extension of indoor to outdoor living space also is provided for each of the homes. The Greenwood styles include Cottage, Monterey, Santa Barbara, and Farmhouse. Isom%. 44 ama =� - f -1W r• . x see n.a Greenwood at Tustin Legacy N • Stafford at Tustin Legacy Stafford consists of 96 homes with wide lots dispersed throughout the northwesterly quadrant of the community on two sides of the centrak -ed park (red shaded area on Figure 3). The homes ranging in size from 3,309 to 3,741 square feet and configured with 4 bedrooms, bonu,, room and 3.5 baths to 5 bedrooms, bonus room, office, and 4.5 baths. The homes architectural styles include: Cottage, Monterey, Santa Barbara, American Classic, Adobe Ranch, and Stucco Bungalow. Stafford at Tustin Legacy City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 12 The centralzed focal park is approximately 6 acres in size and would be accessible to the residents of the project and the public. The public portion of the park is designed with community pla:,.a, playgrounds, main lawns for recreation activities, other amenities such as bocce ball courts, basketball court, picnic areas. The private areas consist of a pool, kids splash and play area, outdoor seating area with built in BBQ, and a club house for residents only. r r� i ice" 1, ' 05 ] 0 n ;w � WJ 1 Clubhouse y'Jw + y Irw t LUMN I fro ice" 1, ' 05 ] 0 n ;w � WJ 1 Clubhouse y'Jw + y Irw t LUMN I City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 13 Tentative Tract Map Tentative Tract Map 17507 is a subdivision of an approximately 78 acre site into 376 numbered lots and 75 lettered lots for the development of 375 single family detached units, a focal park, and other neighborhood amenities. Also included in the map are proposed easements for sewer, water, and other utility; non - exclusive easements for emergency vehicles and public services; public access easement over private streets to the focal park; maintenance easement to Jamboree slope; and reciprocal access easement over private drives in favor of adjacent lots (Attachment B). With respect to circulation system within the tract, the applicant proposes deviation from the City's Construction Standards for Private Streets, Strom Drain and On -site Private Improvements related to curb and gutter. The applicant wishes to utilize shed and flare curbs in lieu of typical 6" standard curb and gutter (Figure 6). Pursuant to the standards, any deviation will require the Building Official approval. The proposed deviation has been reviewed by the Building Official and has been determined to be consistent with the intent of the established standards. Appropriate findings have been included to support the request. Yr•Y ��.��Rw �lnlR it ra�;p uw�� ur ••tiiF Y+[-rr tt-1ia retllia iuiw�7E [nw' .rraR C.r.S -M t0 f •�. �Y �IF.sfw MUr rr�w •il YM r6 � ral..wru t 1 Ir.r I �Y,R �.�'1�p. IIM��r� •11�[Y T YM w1 SCi#'C9aili�S' '�• ^�• r w «��.Ir r'''�w^�n �w��• rygCAL M VqK alr+[��r +anr I �rrM+I.t ruwA MrI�wYIM Ir1 Figure S MOW Imo. L .'I! I �• i I -r rn awl I�r .w w w I-MUr �r 7. r w.rm aw. �$Irr r rrr wwr � w K�rRF�N Y.i�i 1 M�rw�� •rr M 010 DFAW Mo rAWN'r W+O XTALS M Tustin City Code Section 9231 B authorizes the Planning Commission to review and take action on Tentative Maps; however, since the proposal includes other entitlement applications that require City Council approval, VTTM 17507 is to be forwarded to City Council for concurrent consideration. Development Agreement: To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the California Legislature adopted the Development Agreement Statute of the Government Code. Pursuant to the Statute, the City may enter into an agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property and to provide for the development of such property and to establish certain development rights therein. In addition, the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Section 4.2.9 requires a Development City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 14 Agreement in conjunction with or prior to approval of any entitlements associated with private development. DA 2013 -002 included herewith as Attachment H will provide for the orderly implementation of the General Plan, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, the phased development and completion in accordance with the DDA, and certain assurances to the Developer and the City. These assurances require the cooperation and participation of the City and Developer and could not be secured without mutual cooperation in and commitment to the comprehensive planning effort that has resulted in the DA and the Specific Plan. The DA will include, but not be limited to, the following provisions: • The term of the Development Agreement. • Public benefits. • The timing of development as set forth in the DDA. • Construction of infrastructure and public facilities. • Annual review of Developer's performance, etc. Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9607, the Planning Commission shall consider the Development Agreement and make a recommendation thereon to the City Council. The Planning Commission shall forward its recommendation to the City Council within thirty (30) days of the time specified for the public hearing. Other Agencies Input In compliance with State Subdivision Map Act, the City sent out letters along with a copy of the Tentative Tract Map to affected agencies. in response, three (3) agencies provided comments (Attachment C). The Department of Transportation, District 12, indicated their support of the project and asked that subsequent or significant changes to the agreed upon traffic/transportation mitigation to the original program FEIS /EIR be evaluated to determine if there are direct and /or cumulative impacts to the State Highway System. Southern California Edison advised that the proposed map will not be unreasonably interfered with the free and complete exercise of any easements and /or facilities held by Southern California Edison Company. The City of Irvine requested updated information to the Planning Area Trip budget for Tustin Legacy and staff has provided the City of Irvine with the updated table. No further comments were received. Environmental Review On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS /EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06 -43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS /EIR. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS /EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On May 21, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13 -32 approving a second Addendum to the Final EIS /EIR in conjunction with the South Orange County Community College District project. The Final EIS /EIR as amended by the Supplement and the Addendums is referred to herein as the "FEIS /EIR." The FEIS /EIR along with its Addendum and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act City Council Report February 4, 2014 Standard Pacific Corp. Page 15 (CEQA). The FEISIEIR, Addendums and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former MCAS Tustin. An Environmental Checklist (Initial Study) has been prepared and concluded that the proposed actions do not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEISIEIR. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEISIEIR. Planning Commission Action On December 10, 2013, the Planning Commission considered the project and adopted Resolution No. 4239 recommending that the City Council approve the proposed project. The Commission at the hearing revised Condition No. 3.1 requiring the developer to provide enhanced building elevations along Jamboree Road, Warner Avenue off -ramp, future Park Avenue and future Moffett Drive. CONCLUSION The proposed SPA 2013 -002, DDA 13 -03, DA 2013 -003, TTM 17507, CP 2013 -002 and DR 2013 -006 are consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the General Plan and would not have any significant impact to the overall development potential currently allowed. Accordingly, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve SPA 2013- 002, DA 2013 -003, TTM 17507, CP 2013 -002 and DR 2013 -006. And accordingly staff recommends that the City Council approve DDA 13 -03, SPA 2013 -002, DA 2013 -003, TTM 17507, CP 2013 -002 and DR 2013 -006. JohN chanan ty, D irector — Economic Development 11kaawu, JVstina- Willkom Assistant Director - Planning Elizabeth A. Binsack Director of Community Development Attachments: A. Location Map B. Submitted Plans C. Other Agencies Comments D. Planning Commission Minutes of December 10, 2014, and Resolution No. 4238 and 4239 E. City Council Resolution No. 14 -12 (Environmental) F. City Council Resolution No. 14 -13 (Disposition and Development Agreement) G. Ordinance No. 1440 (Specific Plan Amendment) H. Ordinance No. 1441 (Development Agreement) i. City Council Resolution No. 14 -14 (Concept Plan, Tentative Tract Map, and Design Review)