HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 CUP 97-014 DR97-023 12-01-97NO. 2
12-1-97
DATE:
DECEMBER 1, 1997
Inter-Corn
TO'
FROM'
SU~JE~I.
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 & DESIGN REVIEW 97-023
SUMMARY: Conditional Use Permit :(CUP) 97'O14 and DeSign:: Review '9;7-023 :are
requests to :convert an existing, detached..tw°-story .garage'into :a. guest~h°USe and to
construct a twO sto .aara e addition' to the existing residence at 340 west 2nd Street
: - ~t, g · .':.. . ' .: "''. · ' '"
ri, e: projeCt site ..~: located within the~ 'Single:FamilY. ReSidential/CUltUral ReSOUrce
Overlay (R.I/CR) Zoning DistriCt, On ~OctOber':6," 1997, tlt~ Zoning:~Administrator"~:
approved: : CUP 917.014 and DR '97-023, On:: November. .lO. .19917, the:. iPlanning:.:i
RE C OMMENDAT I ON
That the City Council take action as deemed appropriate.
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant paid the original application fees, and there were fees
collected for the appeal of the Zoning Administrator's Action. As this
item was appealed by the City Council, no fees were collected for this
hearing.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Project Description
The existing residence and detached garage were constructed in the 1970s
and are not identified within the City's Historic Survey. The upper
floor of the detached garage includes interior improvements, (i.e:
kitchen, full bathroom, entertainment room, bedroom, hallway, and storage
room),, that were constructed by a previous owner without the benefit of
any zoning approvals or building permits. Accessory buildings used as
guest rooms are allowed in an R-1 zone 'with a CUP per TCC Section
9223 (B) (3) .
The following provides a description of the improvements proposed.
Guest House
The lower level includes a game room, home office, and bathroom in
place of the existing two car garage parking spaces.
City Council Repoz~
Appeal of CUP 97-014 & DR 97-023
December i, 1997
Page 2
The upper level includes a bedroom, bathroom, storage room, and
entertainment room with wet bar.
The existing kitchen improvements will be removed for compliance
with TCC Section 9279 to the satisfaction of the Building Official
(PC Condition 2.2, Resolution 3558).
Garaqe/Room Addition
The proposed addition will increase the building footprint by
approximately 512 square feet and increase total floor area by
approximately 1,025 square feet.
The lower level includes a two car enclosed garage to replace the
garage spaces lost with the guest room conversion.
The upper level includes a studio room.
The proposed addition will be architecturally consistent with the
existing structures, and include a 28'-6" front setback (20 foot
minimum required) and a 7'-6" side setback (5 foot minimum
required).
Site and Surroundinq Properties
The site is 7,500 square feet in size and located within the Cultural
Resources Overlay District on the south side of West 2nd Street, between
A and B Streets. Surrounding uses include residential uses to the north,
south, east, and west. The site is zoned Single Family Residential (R-
I).
Use Restrictions
Tustin City Code Section 9297, defines a guest house as:
"detached living quarters of a permanent type, without kitchens or
cooking facilities and where no compensation in any form is received
or paid".
Therefore, to ensure compliance with the definition of a guest house, the
Planning Commission imposed a condition requiring the property owner to
execute and record a deed restriction stating that the guest house and
room addition shall not be used for leasing, nor shall kitchen and/or
cooking facilities be installed to constitute a second dwelling unit.
The Planning Commission also imposed a condition requiring the removal
of the existing kitchen improvements.
Public Concerns
At the Zoning Administrator public hearing held September 22, 1997,
verbal testimony was received from six individuals who spoke in
opposition to the project. Primarily their concerns related 5o the
aesthetic impacts, the density of the structures, the bulk and location
of the structures, and Orange County Fire Authority access. The Zoning
Administrator continued the public hearing to allow.staff to investigate
and respond to the concerns presented. The Zoning Administrator approved
this project with conditions on. October 6, 1997.
City Council Repor{
Appeal of CUP 97-01e & DR 97-023
December 1, 1997
Page 3
On October 8, 1997, Mary L. Rivas filed a timely appeal of the Zoning
Administrator's approval of the project and noted her justification for
the appeal (Attachment D) .
The Planning Commission considered the appeal and upheld the Zoning
Administrator's Action finding that the project was in compliance with
the R-1 development standards. In particular:
· Buildinq Heiqht - Proposed 25 feet (maximum 30 feet);
· Side Yard Setback - Proposed 7.5 feet (minimum 5 feet);
· Lot Coveraqe - Proposed 39.49 percent (maximum 40 percent).
CITY COUNCIL ALTERNATIVES
The City Council has the discretion to take one of the following actions:
Uphold the Planning Commission's decision and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate Resolution for consideration at the next
meeting;
Direct staff to prepare a Resolution modifying the project design;
or,
· Direct staff to prepare a Resolution denying the request.
BE: br: cup97014, cc
Director, Community Development
Attachments:
Attachment A - Location Map
Attachment B - Submitted Plans
Attachment C - Zoning Administrator Action No. 97-007
Attachment D - Letter of Appeal Dated October 8, 1997
Attachment E - Planning Commission Resolution No. 3558
Attachment F - Letter of Opposition
ATTACHMENT A
LOCATION MAP
ATTACHMENT A
~oJ -CC..-r' ·
~4Ar u~
I[/~ /I/1 J L~VESTJ~ L
FIRST J ~ STREET J [
J I
SECOND ST.
t L3.45.¢ ?.4~
I?~ !?o
.1~
.,
I$~ 1go
205
2t5
,,
ntlRD
SECOND
Z55 ~.230
ST.
320
MAIN
ST.
220
230
STREET
..
· ' NO SCALE
ATTACHMENT B
SUBMITTED PLANS
ATTACHMENT B-1
,/
'!
·
.2. s'r o z / ,
// a zz S E ,¥ t, ;(
'N
ATTACHMENT B-2
i
j/4~
~A
qTTACHMENT B-3
ATTACHMENT B-4
ATTACHMENT B- 5
o .
I.
~-~'ACHM~-NT B- 6
ATTACHMENT B-7
I
ATTACHM_NT B-8
t,-, ;× r- o,
... ,..q
'-- -,.4
.5 "'.,~ A '-
ti..
~TTACHMENT B-lO
OOh~ PL/~ 1.~I
'$T'~"ZE 7-.
S T~ff/~
/,~'q' ~'4"
£2 '
ATTACHMENT B- 1 i
C~
ATTACHMENT B-12
! I1 i
I II I
~ 1t~1
4d
· t~t !-t
~'+' tttl
,i/
_
ATTACHMENT B-13
I t
.ii
ATTACHMENT B-14
ATTACHMENT B-15
i i
, I
I !
/
ATTACHMENT B-17
L
/4,.;~ p//¥/?
ATTACHMENT B-19
ATTACHMENT B-20
f,
O_..~hlP. 5H//,/C_rLE
I,/'/-.',
'i
ATTACHMENT B-21
ATTACHMENT C
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION
NO. 97-007
ATTACHMENT C
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 97-007
2
The Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve
3 as follows:
4 I.
The Zoning Administrator finds and determines as follows:
!0
5 A.
B ·
!! C.
That a proper application, Conditional Use Permit 97-014
and Design Review 97-023, was filed.by Cindy Da!rymple to
authorize the conversion of an existing two-story
detached garage into a guest room, and to construct &
two-story garage addition to an existing residence
located at 340 West 2nd Street.
12
Pursuant to City Code Section 9299(b) (3) (i), the Zoning
Administrator has the authority to approve Conditional
Use Permit applications for accessory buildings to be
used as guest rooms.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held
on said application on September 22, 1997 and continued
to October 6, 1997 by the Zoning Administrator.
13 D.
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
E .
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal .Code,
the Zoning Administrator finds that the architecthral
features, materials and colors will not impair the
orderly and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, or the occupancy
as a whole. In making such findings, the Zoning
Administrator has considered at least the following
items:
1. Setbacks and site planning.
2. Exterior materials and colors.
3. Landscaping, parking area design and traffic
circulation.
4. Location, height and standards of exterior
illumination.
5. Physical relationship of proposed structures to
existing structures in the neighborhood.
6. Appearance and design relationship of proposed
structures to existing structures and possible
future structures in the neighborhood and public
thoroughfares.
7. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by
the City Council.
That the proposed project is categorically exempt (Class
1) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Section 15301.
27
28
i Zoning Administrator Action 97-007
October 6, 1997
2 Page 2
II. The Zoning Administrator hereby approves Conditional Use
Permit 97-014 and Design Review 97-023 to authorize the
conversion of an eXisting two-story detached garage into a
guest room, and to construct a two-story garage addition to an
existing residence located at 340 West 2nd Street, subject to
the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
7
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning
8 Administrator, held on the 6th day of October, 1997.
10
!1
12
13
Zoning Administrator
15
BARBARA REYES g
Recording Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
16 COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
17
I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the
18 Recording Secretary of the Zoning Administrator of the City of
Tustin, California~ that Zoning Administrator Action No. 97-007 was
19 duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning
Administrator, held on the 6th day of October, 1997.
2O
21
BARBARA REYES
22 Recording Secretary
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBIT A
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 97-007
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND DESIGN REVIEW 97-023
OCTOBER 6, 1997
GENERAL
(!) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the
submitted, plans for the project date stamped October 6,
1997 on file with the Community Development Department,
as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of
Community Development Department in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also
approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during
plan check if such modifications are to be consistent
with provisions of the Tustin City Code.
(1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in
this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance
of any building permits for the project, subject to
review and approval by the Community Development
Department.
(1) 1.3 Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval shall
become null and void unless all building permits are
issued and substantial construction is underway within
eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time
extensions may be granted by the Zoning Administrator if
a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to
expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 97-014 and Design
Review 97-023 is-contingent upon the applicant and
property owner signing and returning an ,'Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director
of Community Development prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of
Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of the
City's approval of this project.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
(5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
(7) PC/CC POLICY
*** EXCEPTION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
( 6 ) LANDSCAPING · GUIDELINES
Exhibit A
Zoning Administrator Action 97-007
October 6, 1997
Page 2
PLANNING
(4) 2.1 The property owner shall execute and record a deed
restriction in a form acceptable to the Community
Development Department and City Attorney to ensure that
the guest room and room addition shall not be used for
leasing, rent, or trade,nor shall kitchen and/or cooking
facilities be installed. The deed restriction shall be
recorded with the Office of the County Recorder prior to
the issuance of any permits and shall be binding on all
future owners or interested parties of the property.
(4) 2.2 The kitchen improvements within the guest house are not
permitted pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9233
(B) (3) and shall be removed to the satisfaction of the
Building Officiai.
(4) 2.3 Ail improvements constructed without a building permit
shall be identified on construction level drawings as
required by Condition No. 3.1 below, to the satisfaction
of the Building Official.
(1) 2.4 A Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the Community
Development Director is required prior to the issuance of
permits for the final design plans.
BUILDING
(1) 3.1 At plan check submit three (3) sets of construction
plans, including architectural, structural, electrical,
mechanical, plumbing, details and specifications, and two
(2) sets of structural calculations. Requirements of the
Uniform Building Code shall be complied with as approved
by the Building Official. No field changes shall be made
without corrections submitted to and approved by the
Community Development DePartment.
(3) 3.2 Ail new additions and existing areas added or converted
to a different use shall comply with the prevailing
building codes.
FEES
(1) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall
(5) be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited
to the following. Payment shall be required based upon
those rates in .effect at the time of payment and are
subject to change.
Exhibit A
Zoning Administrator Action 97-007
October 6, 1997
Page 3
A. Building plan check and permit fees to the
Community Development Department based on the most
current schedule.
B. Orange County Fire Authority plan check and
inspection fees to the Community Development
Department based upon the most current schedule.
C. School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School
District subject to any agreement reached and
executed between the District and the applicant.
(1) 4.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject
(5) project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community
Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the
COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight
dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within
such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not
delivered to the Community Development Department the
above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any
interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act could be significantly
lengthened.
BE :br: za97 -007
ATTACHMENT D
LETTER OF APPEAL
OCTOBER 8, 1997
ATTACHMENT D
October 8, 1997
Pamela Stoker
City Clerk
City of Tustin
Tustin City lqall
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
REFERENCE: APPEAL TO APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT 97-014 AND DESIGN
REVIEW 97-023
Dear City Clerk:
This letter will serve as notification of my.desire to appeal the approval on the above
matter.
I still object to the conversion and construction'at 340 West 2nd Street.
Nineteen neighbors have signed their agreement with me, and I will obtain more signatures
to submit to the Planning Commission in support of my appeal.
The addition of a two-story garage will increase the density of structures in what I believe
to be a small area and will destroy the aesthetics of my property and the area. The noise
level will likely increase into my home through the living room windows Which will look out
to the new structure, and the structure will block out the sun into my living room.
I have lived in Tustin since ~and at my current location since 1970 and I, as
most of my neighbors, would not like to see the new structure completed.
Enclosed is my check #~a~. $ ~af' fi-g) as fee for the above appeal.
Thank you,
o.
Mary L. Rivas ,
350 We~f2nd Street
Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 544-6688
RECEIVED
Or.;i' 0 8 1997
COM~ DEVELOPMENT
BY ~.//"~"
ATTACHMENT E
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
NO. 3558
ATTACHMENT E
!0
!1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 3558
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, DENYING THE APPEAL AND
UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S ACTION TO
APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND
DESIGN REVIEW 97-023, AUTHORIZING THE
CONVERSION OF AN EXISTING TWO-STORY DETACHED
GARAGE INTO A GUEST HOUSE AND TO CONSTRUCT A
TWO-STORY GARAGE ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 340 WEST
2ND STREET.
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I o
The Planning Commission finds and determines as
follows:
A,
m o
C ,
D ,
E ,
That a proper application,' Conditional Use
Permit 97-014 and Design Review 97-023, was
filed by Cindy Dalrymple to authorize the
conversion of an existing two-story detached
garage into a guest house and to construct a
two-story garage addition to an existing
single-family residence located at 340 West
2nd Street.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed
and held on said application on September 22,
1997, and a continued public hearing was duly
called, noticed and held on October 6, 1997,
by the Zoning Administrator. The Zoning
Administrator adopted Zoning Administrator
'Action 97-007, approving the request to
convert the existing garage and construct the
new garage'.
That on October 8, 1997, Mary Rivas, resident
at 350 West 2nd Street, submitted an appeal of
the Zoning Administrator's action on this
project.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed
and held for said appeal on November 10, 1997,
by the Planning Commission.
That the proposed use is allowed within the R-
I, Single-Family Residential District, with
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 2
F o
G.
That the conversion of an existing two-story
detached garage into a guest house and the
construction of a two-story garage addition to
an existing single-family residence, as
conditioned, will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be
injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood of the
subject property, or to the general welfare of
the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the
following findings:
The proposed addition complies with all
development standards, set forth for the
R-1 zoning district.
o
Ail proposed construction will be
consistent in style, color and appearance
with the existing construction.
,
Ail improvements within the detached
structure that were constructed without
City-issued building permits shall be
brought into compliance with City Codes.
The kitchen improvements within the
detached structure will be removed and
the exterior stairway will be enclosed,
thereby reducing the potential for use of
the structure as a rental second dwelling
unit.
o
A deed restriction will be executed and
recorded to prohibit the use of the
detached structure for leasing, rental,
or trade, and to prohibit the future
installation of kitchen improvements
within the structure. Said restriction
will run with the land and be binding on
all future owners or interested parties
of the property.
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin
Municipal Code, the Planning Commission finds
that the location, size, architectural
features and general appearance of the parking
lot expanSion area will not impair the orderly
and harmonious development of the area, the
present or future development therein, or the
occupancy as a whole. In making such
findings, the Planning Commission has
considered at least the following items:
I0
I!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 3
1. Height, bulk and area of buildings.
2. Setbacks and site planning.
.
Landscaping, parking area design and
traffic circulation.
4. Location, height and standards of
exterior illumination.
5. Location and method of refuse storage.
o
Physical relationship of proposed
improvements to existing structures in
the neighborhood.
.
Appearance and design relationship of
proposed improvements' to existing
structures and possible future~structures
in the neighborhood and public
thoroughfares.
Development Guidelines and criteria as
adopted by the City Council.
H .
This project is categorically exempt (Class 1)
pursuant to Section 15301 of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
I ,
That the project has been reviewed for
consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element
of the City of Tustin General Plan and has
been determined to be consistent with the Air
Quality Sub-element.
II. The Planning Commission hereby denies the appeal
and upholds the Zoning Administrator's action to
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 97-014 and
Design Review 97-023 to authorize the conversion of
an existing two-story detached garage into a guest
house and the construction of a two-story garage
addition to an existing single-family residence at
340 West 2nd Street, subj'ect to the conditions
contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City
meeting held on t~e 10th day of
of Tustin at a regular ~e.
November, 1997. ~·
Chairman
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 3558
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify
that I am the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the
City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3558 was
duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 10th day of
November, 1997.
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3558
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND DESIGN REVIEW 97-023
NOVEMBER 10, 1997
GENERAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the
submitted plans for the project date stamped November 10,
1997 on file with the Community Development Department,
as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of
Community Development Department in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also
approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during
plan check if such modifications are to be consistent
with provisions of the Tustin City Code.
(1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in
t. his Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance
of any building permits for the project, subject to
review and approval by the Community Development
Department.
(!) 1.3 Conditional Use Permit and Design Review approval shall
become null and void unless all building permits are
issued and substantial construction is underway within
eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time
extensions may be granted by the Zoning Administrator if
a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to
expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 97-014 and Design
Review 97-023 is contingent upon the applicant and
property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director
of Community Development prior to the issuance of
building permits.
(1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of
Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of the
City's approval of this project.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(3) I/NIFORM BUILDING CODE/S
(5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY
(7) PC/CC POLICY
*** EXCEPTION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
(6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3558
Conditions of Approval
November 10, 1997
Page 2
PLANNING
(4) 2.1 The property owner shall execute and record a deed
restriction in a form acceptable to the Community
Development Department and City Attorney to ensure that
the guest room and room addition shall not be used for
leasing, rent, or trade, nor shall kitchen and/or cooking
facilities be installed. The deed restriction shall
provide that if the City is required to commence and
enforce an action'to enforce the conditions contained
herein and the City prevails, the City shall be entitled
to an award of costs and fees incurred by the City
including attorney's fees and administration costs. The
deed restriction shall be recorded with the Office of the
County Recorder prior to the issuance of any permits and
shall be binding on all future owners or interested
parties of the property.
(4) 2.2 The kitchen improvements within the guest house are not
permitted pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9233
(B) (3) and shall be removed to the satisfaction of the
Building Official.
(4) 2.3 Ail improvements constructed without a building permit
shall be identified on construction level drawings as
required by Condition N°. 3.1 below, to the satisfaction
of the Building Official.
(1) 2.4 A Certificate of Appropriateness issued by the Community
Development Director is required prior to the issuance of
permits for the final design plans.
BUILDING
(1) 3.1 At plan check submit three (3) sets of construction
plans, including architectural, structural, electrical,
mechanical, plumbing, details and specifications, and two
(2) sets of structural calculations. Requirements of the
Uniform Building Code shall be complied with as approved
by the Building Official. No field changes shall be made
without corrections submitted to and approved by the
Community Development Department.
(3) 3.2 Ail new additions and existing areas added or converted
to a different use shall comply with the prevailing
building codes.
Exhibit A
Resolution No. 3558
Conditions of Approval
November 10, 1997
Page 3
FEES
(1) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall
(5) be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited
to the following. Payment shall be required based upon
those rates in effect at the time of payment and are
subject to change.
a.
Building plan check and permit fees to the
Community Development Department based on the most
current schedule.
Orange County Fire Authority plan check and
inspection fees to the Community Development
Department based upon the most current schedule.
C .
School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School
District subject to any agreement reached and
executed between the District and the applicant.
(1) 4.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject
(5) project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community
Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the
COIINTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight
dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within
such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not
delivered to the Community Development Department the
above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any
interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act could be significantly
lengthened.
ATTACHMENT F
LETTER OF OPPOSITION
SEPTEMBER 18, 1997
ATTACHMENT F
September 18, 1997
RECEIVED
SEP l g 1997
COMMUNITY DEVELO?MENT
BY_
Pamela Stoker
City Clerk
City of Tustin
Tustin City Hall
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
REFERENCE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND DESIGN REVIEW 97-023
Dear City Clerk:
I have received the Official Notice of Public Hearing for the above referenced matter.
NIy property is next to the 340 VVest 2nd Street where Ms. Dalrymple wishes to convert an
existing two-story detached garage to a guest house per Tustin City Code Section 9223 (B)
(3) and to construct a two-story garage addition to an existing, non-contributing structure
located there.
This letter is my official notice of my objection to this conversion and construction.
I understand the guest unit would not be a rental unit, but used for guests of the property
owner. Assurances of this will be requested at the public hearing on September 22, 1997
being conducted by the Zoning Administrator of the City.
The addition of a two-story garage will increase the density of structures in what I believe
to be a small area and will destroy the aesthetics of my property and the area. The noise
level will likely increase into my home through the living room ~vindows which will look out
to the new structure. 77e~'
I have lived in Tustin since the mid 1950s and at my current location since 1970 and would
not like to see the new structure completed.
Thank you,
350 Wes{' 2nd Street
Tustin, CA '92780
(714) 544-6688
THE FOLLOVVENG HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER'
NAME ADDRESS
THE FOLLOWLNG 15IOMEOSVNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE V~ITI~t I~[RS. RIVAS'
LETTER:
NAME
/
ADDRESS
/a -/ -
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER.
NAME
AoA.K. 1' 3A1(U5tt/
—1;,4kg 110V
wf(av[tOnNtt
C.4141&) D5kr-cr
ADDRESS
310 S 3 ST ( srra cot 4Z ?8b
"5 s �� SIfl b-CP °t)5
350 t -, r 9.i7b
7a ?Po
emahust
41'5 W . AM] hey. 92.78D
2,(-40 w -3Pc Cam-( Fwt- A„
-340 11 eCR) Yj 7ui 9A7 °
1(a ;3Sw34 %`P
z,SS So 1/Ail r i vrrir. q ao
ZSS a. 5r. -rO5r J 9a7?' 0
�3S 500TH A n 5 .\i)
• •
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER.
NAME
ty I ✓o/11J it a
dhd . klet,y
Seun
d�
atilt
r
ADDRESS
255 so. `Ai/ S%` r,454'e! 64 ?27t
j3 (e)? CI.A.kw,& p,.-.Ta & C4,`e44v
A\kt\& \cx r WVOS 1
&f V w� cA
4, tei
`fb Go I Wig?
5041-Z
•
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER.
dr/r>/%54-6
ADDRESS
ar10 fe-te
9S, (JJir/ /27 yr /ke UC
75 ww J h7��-& 1v-e..
;205 5 knyle 002J
S2_0 S,
336 S 'B- t1 'Oaf-
2(et S A-LY0T LE 6v
06Pr° a
2 rD S02g t 42m7e
�I I. I. �1
• •
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER.
NAME ADDRESS
•
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS RIVAS'
LETTER.
NAME
ADDRESS
tl55 (7/ ll y
a2.Ao Jv „Ala
`' ,' 7:2 Y ere,-C
alas ) •A V 5-t Yee
f3o 1-4-2 s —7.5 7
w, 14->
Soo W tr 0 5r i us
44
id, Li
500 w
`rid 54-CIA-34-d
sic Y` a 3 �. 4,�
•
THE FOLLOWING HOMEOWNERS AND RESIDENTS AGREE WITH MRS. RIVAS'
LETTER
NAME
ose
ADDRESS
g0 o n-t4 P1
7e cc (g-
C�o 023E
'rm IJk�GAP2Ett
r10 rit;
4 671
rl
(; awl C
ctoharet-