Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-ATTACHMENT 2■ ` ■ ►/ 1 2013 Annual Mitigation Monitoring and Status Report for Final Joint Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (As modified by Final Supplement #1 and Addendum to FEIS/EIR) For the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin SCH No. 94071005 City of Tustin Community Development Department 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Activities that took place in 2013 and/or are currently in progress are identified in Italic. Introduction: Pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin, an annual review and a brief progress memorandum based on that review shall be prepared by each applicable city (City of Tustin or City or Irvine). The City of Tustin’s annual review and progress memorandum provides the following: 1.A general description of the project’s status, including actual or projected completion dates, if known. 2.The current status for each mitigation measure. Background: On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR evaluated the environmental impacts of the reuse and disposal of MCAS-Tustin, which included the adoption of a Specific Plan and other implementing actions. On December 6, 2004, the City of Tustin adopted Resolution No. 04-76 certifying a Supplement (Final Supplement #1) and Resolution No. 04-77 adopting the revised Mitigation Monitoring Report Program to the FEIS/EIR. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin. Included in Resolution Nos. 00-90, 04-77, and 06-43 was a requirement for a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin. The purpose of the MMRP is to report accomplishment of mitigation measures required by the FEIS/EIR. Mitigation measures and implementation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR, Final Supplement #1, and Addendum for the disposal and reuse of MCAS Tustin have been incorporated into a table. Each mitigation measure and implementation measure is listed separately on the table with appropriate space for monitoring the progress of the implementation of each measure. Implementation measures were also required where environmental impacts were less than significant, but supported the proposed development within the reuse plan area concurrent with demand. Implementation measures and mitigation measures are both discussed in this MMRP, and are equally enforceable. The following information is identified in the table: The measures listed by environmental impact area in the same order as they are listed in the  Final EIS/EIR, Final Supplement #1, and Addendum; The timing of implementation of the mitigation or implementation measure;  The agency responsible for compliance;  The appropriate agency to enforce the mitigation measure or implementation measure; and  Status of the mitigation or implementation measure.  The mitigation measures and implementation measures in the table are listed by environmental impact area in the same order as they are listed in the Final EIS/EIR, Final Supplement #1, and Addendum. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 2 2013 Annual Report MMRP Construction Activities: Residential/Commercial/Institutional Activities:  John Laing Homes – Tustin Field I (Harvard Avenue and Edinger Avenue): All 376 units are completed.  John Laing Homes – Tustin Field II (Harvard Avenue and Edinger Avenue): All 189 homes are completed.  Columbus Square/Columbus Grove: All 1,540 homes and community amenities are completed.  South Orange County Community College District (SOCCCD): Phase I of the SOCCCD Advanced Technology Education Park (ATEP) has been completed and is currently offering classes. The Concept Plan for Phase 3A was approved by the City on July 26, 2010 authorizing up to 305,000 square feet of educational uses; however, in August 2013, the City and the SOCCCD completed a Land Exchange Agreement and a Development Agreement and Amended and Restated (Conveyance) Agreement to: a) exchange and consolidate parcels to better enhance development potential for City and SOCCCD properties; b) maintain a minimum of 51 percent educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while allowing additional non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2) at the ATEP campus; c) increase the allowable square footage as a result of adding a new local street (Bell Avenue); and d) transfer control of the Phase 1 campus to the City for its use by Summer 2016. Demolition of the majority of the former military structures is nearing completion; demolition of the balance of the site is anticipated to commence by Summer 2014. As a result of the Land Exchange and Development Agreements, SOCCCD is re-evaluating the overall development plan for the campus including what was previously authorized per the Phase 3A Concept Plan. Development plans for future phases of the site have yet to be identified or submitted to the City.  Rancho Santiago Community College District: The Sheriff’s training facility is complete; however, a portion of the property remains undeveloped. RSCCD has not identified any plans for development the remaining portion of the site.  Orange County Rescue Mission’s Village of Hope (Lansdowne/Valencia): A 192-bed transitional home for the homeless at Tustin Legacy to be operated by the Orange County Rescue Mission. Certificate of Occupancy for the transitional home has been issued. In November 2007, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to the Village of Hope Conditional Use Permit to allow for a medical/dental clinic to operate in conjunction with the transitional home. The construction for this medical/dental clinic is complete.  The District at Tustin Legacy/Vestar (Barranca Parkway and Jamboree Road): Construction of the 1 million square-foot Class A retail center is complete with the exception of certain adjacent infrastructure improvements. On October 21, 2010 the City and Vestar entered into a Fifth DDA amendment and Fifth Amendment to the Infrastructure and Payment Agreement deferring the construction of certain storm drain related infrastructure improvements within Barranca Parkway and Warner Avenue from June 15, 2010 until grading activities adjacent to the site occur, but in any event no later than June 15, 2012. Warner Avenue storm drain improvements were completed in 2013. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 3 2013 Annual Report MMRP  County of Orange Tustin Family Campus (15405 Lansdowne Road):The project involves a multi-treatment campus which includes four (4) stand-alone residential homes at 4,733 square feet each; three (3) two-story residential buildings, each 8,430 square feet; a 12,224 square foot, two-story campus service center; and a 1,000 square foot maintenance building for a total of 57,446 square feet of building area with a serving capacity of 90 beds for abused and neglected children and their parents and emancipated youth to be operated by the Orange County Social Services Agency. Construction was completed in 2009.  Master Development Site: The City and the former Master Developer, Tustin Legacy Community Partners, LLC (TLCP), entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) in April 2006 which was subsequently amended in March 2007 and in June 2007. The DDA identified the terms of development of an approximate 820 acre footprint at Tustin Legacy and the City’s sale of the property to TLCP, which resulted in conveyance of the first of four phases of property from the City to TLCP in 2007; however, TLCP defaulted on its obligations per the DDA, and the DDA was terminated on July 6, 2010. As a consequence, title to the Phase 1 property was transferred back to the City on August 5, 2010. Prior to termination of the DDA, TLCP completed a majority of the site preparation activities, including building and runway removals, and a large amount of the mass grading activities. The City subsequently completed an updated development plan: the “Tustin Legacy Disposition Strategy for the Former Master Developer Footprint” as confirmed by the City Council on April 25, 2011. The Disposition strategy provides a framework for moving forward with completing the Tustin Legacy project pursuant to the Specific Plan with the city assuming a more limited Master Developer role by marketing smaller segment “Disposition Packages” (DPs) or parcel groupings based on market and infrastructure needs. Ten Disposition Packages (1A, 1B, 1C and 2 through 8) were originally created with the City reserving the ability to consolidate or otherwise refine over time as market needs evolve. In 2012 the City executed Disposition and Development Agreements for the first two Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A with St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company, respectively. Grading and construction activities commenced for both sites in June 2013 for the construction of 225 apartments on 1A-North and 533 apartments on 2A. The Irvine Company will also be responsible for constructing certain backbone infrastructure improvements, including portions of Warner Avenue and Park Avenue west of Tustin Ranch Road. Park Avenue street name, west of Tustin Ranch Road, has been changed to Legacy Road, which is under construction and near final completion. The City Council has entered into an Exclusive Agreement to Negotiate with Standard Pacific on Disposition Parcels 1B and 6A for the development of approximately 375 homes. The City Council also approved an Exclusive Agreement to Negotiate with the Regency for a commercial development at site 1C located at the southeast corner of Kensington Park Drive and Edinger Avenue. The City Council held two New Vision Concept workshops regarding the Tustin Legacy Disposition Strategy, the first on June 29, 2013, and the second on December 5, 2013. The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 4 2013 Annual Report MMRP timeframe for the disposition of the remaining Disposition Parcels is currently unknown as the City continues to refine the Tustin Legacy Implementation Plan. Infrastructure Activities Major Backbone Infrastructure includes roads and may also include street lighting, traffic control, dry and wet utilities, and other work required in accordance with Governmental Requirements and EIR/EIS requirements.  Armstrong Avenue (From Valencia to Warner)/Severyns Road: This project has been completed.  Armstrong Avenue (From Barranca Avenue to Warner Avenue): The City commenced with grading and construction is anticipated to be completed by Summer 2015.  Barranca Parkway – Red Hill to Jamboree Road: Vestar completed the Barranca Parkway Segment from Tustin Ranch Road to Jamboree Road. The City of Irvine completed the Barranca Parkway segment from Red Hill Avenue to approximately 1,000 feet west of Aston Street in 2012. The segment from 1,000 feet west of Aston Street to Tustin Ranch Road is under construction and is expected to be completed in Spring 2014. The remaining Barranca Channel improvements are anticipated to be completed in 2016.  Edinger Avenue – Red Hill Avenue to Kensington Park Drive: This project has been completed.  Harvard Avenue – Barranca Parkway to just south of OCTA/SCRRA railroad: This project has been completed.  Lansdowne Road: This project has been completed.  Marble Mountain Road (renamed as “Sweet Shade” in the City of Irvine): This project has been completed.  Valencia Avenue – Red Hill Avenue to Kensington Park Drive: This project has been completed.  Kensington Park Drive: This project has been completed.  Park Avenue – Tustin Ranch Road to Jamboree Road Southbound Off-ramp: This project has been completed. The Irvine Company is commencing with construction of Park Avenue, which has been renamed to Legacy Road, from Tustin Ranch Road west to Legacy Road (local road to be completed by the Irvine Company) in conjunction with completion of the Disposition Parcel 2A project and anticipated to be completed by Spring 2014.  Warner Avenue – Tustin Ranch Road to east of Park Avenue: This project has been completed. The City commenced with the grading of Warner Avenue from Tustin Ranch Road to Red Hill, including the portion completed by the Irvine Company adjacent to their site, and construction anticipated to be completed by Summer 2015.  Tustin Field I Bike-Trail on North side of Project: This project has been completed. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 5 2013 Annual Report MMRP  Tustin Ranch Road extension from Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue: The City commenced with the project in 2011; construction was completed in 2013, including the Edinger Avenue bridge, Valencia Avenue (Kensington Park Drive to Tustin Ranch Road), Legacy Road (Tustin Ranch Road to Park Avenue), and Park Avenue (Warner Avenue to Legacy Road).  Tustin Ranch Road – Barranca Parkway to Warner Avenue: This project has been completed. Status of Mitigation: Attached to this report is a table which shows the status of implementation and mitigation measures listed in the MMRP. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 6 2013 Annual Report MMRP MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MCAS TUSTIN DISPOSAL AND REUSE Revised February 2014 The following are measures included in the Final EIS/EIR, Final Supplement #1, and Addendum for the disposal and reuse of MCAS Tustin that identifies both mitigation and implementation measures. Implementation measures are to be required where environmental impacts are less than significant, but supported the proposed development within the reuse plan area concurrent with demand. Both implementation and mitigation measures are identified in the adopted Mitigation and Monitoring Report Program, Final Supplement #1, and Addendum (Resolution Nos. 00-90, 04-77, and 06-43) and are equally enforceable. Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for Land Use LU-1. The City of Tustin shall amend its Prior to a final map City of Tustin Community Completed through adoption of Resolution No. 00- General Plan and zoning ordinance to be recordation (except Development 91 on January 16, 2001, for General Plan consistent with planned land uses. Any for financing and Department Amendment 00-001 and through adoption of the zoning ordinance shall include site re-conveyance (Tustin) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan through Ordinance No. design measures such as buffering, purposes) within 1257 on February 3, 2003. landscaping, screening, and setbacks, to the Reuse Plan ensure high quality development and Area within the On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted compatibility between land uses. The City of Tustin. Resolution No. 06-43 approving an addendum to the goal is to assure that the overall Final Environmental Impact Statement/ appearance of development on the site is Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and at least similar in quality to other master Reuse of MCAS Tustin and Zone Change 05-002 planned areas in Tustin and other through Ordinance No. 1311. adjacent cities. On May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-33 approving an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 7 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Reuse of MCAS Tustin and Specific Plan Amendment 2013-0001 through Ordinance No. 1432. LU-2. The City of Irvine shall amend its Prior to a final map City of Irvine Community Complete General Plan and zoning ordinance to be recordation (except Development consistent with planned land uses. Any for financing and Department zoning ordinance shall include site re-conveyance (Irvine) design measures such as buffering, purposes) within landscaping, screening, and setbacks, to the Reuse Plan ensure high quality development and Area within the compatibility between land uses. The City of Irvine. goal is to assure that the overall appearance of development on the site is at least similar in quality to other master planned areas in Tustin and other adjacent cities. (a) The City of Tustin or City of Irvine, as See Table 4.3-1 of City of Tustin Community  The District appropriate, shall ensure that the Final EIS/EIR and/or City of Development The project complies with phasing requirement; infrastructure is constructed in phases as or Table 4-2 at the Irvine, as Department/ all infrastructure improvements were included in triggered by identified thresholds in end of this applicable Public Works DDA 04-02, or as conditioned by Resolution Table 4-2 of the revised Specific Plan Mitigation (Tustin and/or Nos. 04-73, 04-74, 3920, 3921, 3922, 3923, and Phasing Plan, Phasing Plan Monitoring and Irvine, as 3924 Requirements (see Table 4-2 at the end Reporting applicable) of this Mitigation Monitoring and Program for each  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Reporting Program). The Phasing Plan specific triggering The project complies with phasing requirements; provides an organizational framework to mechanism. all subdivision infrastructures will be provided or facilitate development of the reuse plan paid for by the applicant as conditioned by area in tandem with infrastructure Resolution Nos. 3946 and 3947. Public necessary to support the planned improvements are complete. As required by the development. (As amended by EIS/EIR, the City entered into a Cooperative MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 8 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Addendum) Agreement with the Marble Mountain Partners to ensure the developer’s responsibility for payment This framework reflects the fact that or construction of Tustin Legacy Backbone each component of the infrastructure has Infrastructure and subsequently entered into an its own threshold for accommodating Acquisition and Funding Agreement as part of additional development toward Assessment District No. 06-01 (Tustin build-out of the reuse plan area. The Legacy/Columbus Villages) for funding and triggering mechanisms that identify construction obligations of developer for required timing of key infrastructure provisions Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure. are summarized in Table 4-2 of the revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan,  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Phasing Plan Requirements (see Table The project complies with the phasing 4-2 at the end of this Mitigation requirement; all subdivision infrastructures will Monitoring and Reporting Program). be provided by the applicant as conditioned by Resolution Nos. 3952 and 3953. Public improvements are complete. As required by the EIS/EIR, the City entered into a Cooperative Agreement with the Marble Mountain Partners to ensure the developer’s responsibility for payment or construction of Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure and subsequently entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement as part of Assessment District No. 06-01 (Tustin Legacy/Columbus Villages) for funding and construction obligations of developer for required Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The infrastructure to support the project was constructed concurrently with the project. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 9 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Village of Hope The project complies with infrastructure phasing requirements in the EIS/EIR.  Tustin Family Campus The project complies with phasing infrastructure requirements in the EIS/EIR.  SOCCCD The infrastructure to support Phase 1 of the on- site project was constructed concurrently with the project; additional infrastructure to support future phases will be required to be constructed prior to or concurrently with future phases.  Master Developer Footprint : Pursuant to the Tustin Legacy Disposition Strategy, infrastructure and phasing obligations have been assigned to each Disposition Package based upon respective site needs and anticipated development sequencing to comply with the FEIS/EIR The applicable infrastructure and phasing obligations will be met upon completion of the first two Disposition Packages (1A-North and 2A) pursuant to the executed DDAs. (b) Prior to a final map recordation (except Prior to final map Project Community  The District for financing and re-conveyance recordation developer Development All dedication required by DDA 04-02, or as purposes), the development applicant (except for Department conditioned by Resolution Nos. 04-73, 04-74, shall enter into an agreement with the financing and re- (Tustin and/or 3920, 3921, 3922, 3923, and 3924 was included City of Tustin and City of Irvine and conveyance Irvine, as and recorded with the final map. any appropriate regional utility agencies, applicable) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 10 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility districts, and providers, as applicable, to purposes).  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) dedicate all easement, right-of-ways, or All dedication required by Condition 6.1 of other land determined necessary to Resolution No. 3863 was included and recorded construct adequate utility infrastructure with the final map. and facilities to serve the project as determined by the City, Agency,  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) District, or other providers. All required easements by Condition 11.1 of Resolution No. 3885 were dedicated with recordation of Final Map 16507  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Required dedication by Condition 3.3 of Resolution No. 3946 was included in the recorded final map  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Required dedications as per Resolution No. 3952 were included in the final map and was recorded in March, 2006  SOCCCD (ATEP) All easements for Phase I project have been recorded; however, dedication of easements, right-of-ways, or other land determined necessary to construct adequate utility infrastructure and facilities to serve future phases of development as determined by the City, SOCCCD or other utility providers will need to be defined with each phase and recorded. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 11 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  RSCCD (Regional Law Enforcement Training Facility) All easements have been recorded for the Sheriff’s Training Facility; however, dedication of easements, right-of-ways, or other land determined necessary to construct adequate utility infrastructure and facilities to serve future phases of development as determined by the City, RSCCCD or other utility providers will need to be defined with any future phase and recorded.  Village of Hope All easements have been recorded. Requirement fulfilled.  Master Development Footprint: The Final Sector B Map for Neighborhood E (Final Map 17144) and Neighborhoods B, D, and G (Final Map 17404) for Conveyance Purposes Only have been approved. Dedication of easements, right-of-ways, or other land determined necessary to construct adequate utility infrastructure and facilities to serve future phases of development as determined by the City or other utility providers, will also need to be defined with each future phase and recorded as may be deemed necessary upon completion for each Disposition Parcel pursuant to the Disposition Strategy. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 12 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (c) Prior to any final map recordation Prior to final map Project Community  The District (except for financing and conveyance recordation developer Development DDA capital improvement obligations have been purposes), the development applicant (except for Department satisfied per CFD 07-01, per DDA 04-02, and the shall enter into a secured agreement financing and re-(Tustin and/or Infrastructure and Construction Payment with the cities of Tustin and/or Irvine, as conveyance Irvine, as Agreement and Amendments. applicable, to participate on a pro-rated purposes). applicable) basis in construction of capital  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) improvements necessary to provide DDA capital improvement obligations have been adequate utility facilities. satisfied per CFD 04-1.  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) DDA capital improvement obligations have been satisfied per CFD 04-1.  Columbus Square (16581) and Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Per the Cooperative Agreement and CFD 06-01, developer has met their current obligation to fund necessary capital improvements.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 13 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project is complete, including all on-site improvements by RSCCD. RSCCD capital improvement costs for public uses are exempt from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure obligation; however, RSCCD is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors. A portion of the site remains undeveloped and could involve a subsequent future phase. In such case, RSCCD will be responsible for any necessary on-site infrastructure.  Village of Hope Project is complete, including all on-site improvements by Village of Hope. An agreement was executed and provided the necessary dedications to ensure emergency access and construction of required utility infrastructure from an adjacent property owner (SOCCCD).  Master Development Footprint: Pursuant to the DDAs with St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively, the Developers are required to participate on a pro-rated basis in funding and construction (construction required MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 14 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility for 2A only) of their fair-share contribution of the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure obligations. Future developers will be required to participate on a pro-rated basis in funding and/or construction of capital improvements necessary to provide adequate utility facilities, as determined by the City in conjunction with any subsequent developer agreements entered into between the City and developers. (d) Prior to the issuance of permits for any Prior to the Project Community  The District public improvements or development issuance of permits developer Development Will serve letter is on–file. All utilities are project, a development applicant shall for any public Department provided. submit to the City of Tustin and City of improvements or (Tustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, information from development Irvine, as  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) IRWD which outlines required facilities project. appropriate) Will serve letter is on –file. All utilities are necessary to provide adequate potable provided water and reclaimed water service to the development.  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) Will serve letter is on –file. All utilities are provided  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Will serve letter is on –file. All utilities are provided.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Will serve letter is on –file. All utilities are provided.  SOCCCD (ATEP) IRWD has determined there will be adequate MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 15 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility facilities to serve Phase 1 of the project; a will- serve letter will need to be submitted for all future phases of development.  Tustin Family Campus IRWD has determined there will be adequate facilities to serve the project. All utilities are provided.  RSCCD IRWD has determined there will be adequate facilities to serve the Sheriff’s Training Facility project; however, IRWD will need to determinate if adequate facilities will be available for any future phases.  Village of Hope Will serve letter is on–file. All utilities are provided.  Master Development Footprint: An Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) Sub Area Master Plan (SAMP) is currently in place. Future developer(s) will be required to provide a will serve letter in conjunction with any future entitlement applications. Plans for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively have been approved by IRWD. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 16 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (e) Prior to the issuance of building permits, Prior to the Project Community  The District the project developer shall ensure that issuance of the developer Development Fire Master plan approved and all fire hydrants fire hydrants capable of flows in amounts certificates of use Department were installed and inspected by OCFA. approved by the OCFA are in place and and occupancy. (Tustin and/or operational to meet fire flow Irvine, as  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) requirements. (As amended by appropriate); Fire Master plan approved and all fire hydrants Addendum) OCFA were installed and inspected by OCFA.  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) Fire Master plan approved and all fire hydrants were installed and inspected by OCFA.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Fire Master plan approved and all fire hydrants were installed and inspected by OCFA.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Fire Master plans reviewed and approved by OCFA – installation is in progress  Tustin Family Campus OCFA has determined that the project plans and data show adequate flows to serve the project.  SOCCCD (ATEP) OCFA has determined that the project plans and data show adequate flows to serve Phase 1 of the project; OCFA will need to determine adequate flows for all future phases.  RSCCD OCFA has determined that the project plans and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 17 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility data show adequate flows to serve the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project; however, OCFA will need to determine adequate flows will be available for any future phases.  Village of Hope Fire Master plans reviewed and approved by OCFA.  Master Development Footprint The required location and number of hydrants will be reviewed and approved by OCFA in conjunction with any future entitlement applications submitted by future developers within the Master Development Footprint, including by St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. (f) Prior to the issuance of permits for any Prior to the Project Community  The District public improvements or development issuance of permits developer Development IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. project, a development applicant shall for any public Department All on-site utilities have been constructed. submit to the City of Tustin and City of improvements or (Tustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, information from development Irvine, as  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) IRWD or the City of Tustin which project. applicable) IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. outlines required facilities necessary to All on-site utilities are constructed. provide adequate sanitary sewage service to the development.  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. All on-site utilities are constructed. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 18 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. On site utilities were provided.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. On-site utilities are under construction.  Tustin Family Campus IRWD and OCSD have determined there will be adequate facilities to serve the project.  SOCCCD (ATEP) IRWD and OCSD have determined there will be adequate facilities to serve the Phase 1 project; determinations will be made for all future phases.  RSCCD Requirement fulfilled. IRWD and OCSD have determined there will be adequate facilities to serve the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project; however, IRWD and OCSD will need to determine adequate facilities will be available for any future phases.  Village of Hope IRWD and OCSD approval letters were provided. All on-site utilities are completed.  Master Development Footprint: Any required information would be submitted with subsequent entitlement applications by each MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 19 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility future project within the Master Development Footprint. Plans for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively, have been approved by IRWD. (g) Prior to the issuance of grading permits Prior to the Project Tustin Building  The District or approval of any subdivision map issuance of grading developer Division or the Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood (except for financing and re-conveyance permits or Irvine Public plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009) purposes), whichever occurs first, for approval of any Works development within the 100-year flood subdivision map Department, as  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) plain, grading and drainage systems shall (except for applicable Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood be designed by the project developer financing and re- plain FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009) such that all building pads would be safe conveyance from inundation from runoff from all purposes),  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) storms up to and including the theoretical whichever occurs Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood 100-year storm, to the satisfaction of the first. plain FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009) City of Tustin Building Division or the Irvine Public Works Department, as  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) applicable. Grading permits or Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood subdivision maps generated for financing plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009) and reconveyance purposes are exempt.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009)  Tustin Family Campus Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 20 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  SOCCCD (ATEP) Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  RSCCD Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  Village of Hope Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  Master Developer Footprint Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009). (h) Prior to construction of regional flood Prior to Project Public Works  Master Development Footprint: control facilities, appropriate state and construction of developer Department TLCP previously obtained the 401, 404, and 1602 federal approvals, including agreements regional flood (Tustin and/or permits for regional flood control channel and permits, shall be obtained. These control facilities. Irvine, as improvements; however, the proportionate include but are not limited to Regional applicable) portions of the permit responsibilities affecting Water Quality Control Board permits, construction of Peters Canyon Channel including NPDES permits; Section 401 improvements between Tustin City limits southerly water quality certifications; Section 404 to Barranca Parkway were transferred directly permits from the USACOE, and Section from TLCP to Tustin Vista Partners, LLC, a 1601 or 1603 agreements from the Delaware limited liability company, on May 6, CDFG in a manner meeting the approval 2008. Upon termination of the DDA between the of the City of Tustin and the Irvine City and TLCP in July 2010, the 401, 404, and Public Works Department, as applicable. 1062 permits affecting the Master Development Footprint in the City of Tustin were assigned to the City of Tustin until such time the permit(s) (As amended by Addendum) and/or applicable mitigation responsibilities can MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 21 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility be assigned to subsequent developer(s) in the future.  The District: Have received 401, 404, and 1601 permits for regional flood control channel improvements.  SOCCCD: Regional permits not required for Phase 1 of project and applicable clearances have been obtained in 2011 for the balance of the site. (i) Prior to issuance of any grading permit or Prior to issuance of Project Tustin Building  The District approval of any subdivision map (except any grading permit developer Division or the Site not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA for financing and conveyance purposes), or approval of any Irvine Public Map dated December 3, 2009). for any development that is either subdivision map Works partially or completely located within the (except for Department, as  Tustin Field I 100-year flood plain of the Flood financing and applicable Site not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA Insurance Rate Map, the development conveyance Map dated December 3, 2009). applicant shall submit all required purposes). documentation to the FEMA and  Tustin Field II demonstrate that the application for a Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Conditional Letter of Map Revision for Map dated December 3, 2009). changes to the 100-year flood plain is satisfied in a manner meeting the  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) approval of each respective city, as Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA applicable. Map dated December 3, 2009).  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Site not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA Map dated February 18, 2004). MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 22 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Tustin Family Campus Not applicable. The project is not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  SOCCCD (ATEP) Not applicable. The project is not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  RSCCD (Sheriff) Not applicable. The project is not within the 100- year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  Village of Hope Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009).  Master Developer Footprint: Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009). (j) Prior to the approval of any applicable Prior to the Project Public Works  The District subdivision map (except for financing approval of any Developer Department All improvements necessary for public health and and conveyance purposes), the applicable (Tustin and/or safety have been installed; however, pursuant to developer - applicant shall design and subdivision map Irvine, as the Fifth DDA Amendment and Fifth Amendment construct local drainage systems for (except for applicable) to the Infrastructure Construction and Payment conveyance of the 10-year runoff. If the financing and Agreement between the City and Vestar, the facility is in a local sump, it shall be conveyance schedule for installation of certain storm drain designed to convey the 25-year runoff. purposes). related improvements affected by grading activities adjacent to the District within Barranca MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 23 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility will occur in conjunction with future grading on adjacent sites but in no event later than June 15, 2015. Warner Avenue storm drain improvements were completed in 2013.  Tustin Field I (Tract 16474) Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed  Tustin Field II (Tract 16507) Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed  Tustin Family Campus Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed  SOCCCD (ATEP) Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed for Phase 1 of the project: however, a hydrology plan must be submitted and approved by the City and improvements installed in conjunction with future plans.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility; however, a Hydrology Plan will need to be MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 24 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility approved and improvements installed for any future phases of development.  Village of Hope Hydrology Plan approved and improvements installed.  Master Developer Footprint Not applicable - Site not within the 100-year flood plain (FEMA Map dated December 3, 2009). (k) Prior to any grading for any new Prior to any Project Building Division development, the following drainage grading for any Developer or Public Works studies shall be submitted to and new development. Department approved by the City of Tustin, City of (Tustin and/or Irvine, and/or OCFCD, as applicable: Irvine, as applicable) (1) A drainage study including Prior to any Project Tustin Building  The District diversions (i.e., off-site areas that grading for any Developer Division or Public The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved drain onto and/or through the new development. Works and construction on a majority of the systems have project site), with justification and Department been included with exception of certain Barranca appropriate mitigation for any (Tustin and/or storm drain channel improvements, which will be proposed diversion. Irvine, as constructed by no later than June 15, 2015 per the th applicable) 5 DDA Amendment and Fifth Amendments to the Infrastructure Construction and Payment Agreement. Warner Avenue storm drain improvements were completed in 2013. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 25 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Tustin Field I The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and improvements were installed  Tustin Field II The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and improvements were installed  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and improvements were installed  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) The Hydrology plans for the project have been reviewed and approved. The project is currently under construction.  Tustin Family Campus Grading and drainage plans approved by the City. Construction of the project is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements installed for Phase 1 of project; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved by the City and improvements installed in conjunction with future phases.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements installed for the initial Sheriff’s MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 26 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Training Facility; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be approved by the City and improvements installed for any future phases.  Village of Hope The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and construction is complete.  Master Development Footprint City and/or future developer(s) will assume responsibility to submit detailed information for all phases during the entitlement application phases for Neighborhoods B, D, E and G as determined necessary. Grading and drainage plans approved by the City for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively, and construction is underway. (2) A drainage study evidencing that Prior to any Project Tustin Building  The District proposed drainage patterns would grading for any Developer Division or Public The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved not result in increased 100-year new development. Works and improvements installed. peak discharges within and Department downstream of the project limits, (Tustin and/or  Tustin Field I and would not worsen existing Irvine, as The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved drainage conditions at storm drains, applicable) . and improvements were installed culverts, and other street crossings including regional flood control  Tustin Field II facilities. The study shall also The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved propose appropriate mitigation for . and improvements were installed any increased runoff causing a worsening condition of any existing facilities within or downstream of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 27 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility project limits. Implementation of  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) appropriate interim or ultimate flood The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved control infrastructure construction . and improvements were installed must be included.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) The Hydrology plans for the project have been reviewed and approved. The project is currently under construction.  Tustin Family Campus The Hydrology plans for the project have been reviewed and approved. Construction of the project is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements installed for Phase 1 of the project; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved by the City and improvements installed in conjunction with future phases.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements installed for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be approved by the City and improvements installed for any future phases.  Village of Hope The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and construction is complete. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 28 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Master Development Footprint: Drainage study complete. Developers will be required to submit a Hydrology Plan for compliance with the approved drainage study. (3) Detailed drainage studies indicating Prior to any Project Tustin Building  The District how, in conjunction with the grading for any Developer Division or Public The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved drainage conveyance systems new development. Works and improvements were installed. including applicable swales, Department channels, street flows, catch basins, (Tustin and/or  Tustin Field I storm drains, and flood water Irvine, as The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved retarding, building pads are made applicable) . and improvements were installed safe from runoff inundation which may be expected from all storms up  Tustin Field II to and including the theoretical The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved 100-year flood. . and improvements were installed  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved . and improvements were installed  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) The Hydrology plans for the project have been reviewed and approved. The project is currently under construction.  Tustin Family Campus Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements are complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 29 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility and improvements completed for Phase 1 of the project; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved by the City and improvements installed in conjunction with future phases.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Grading and drainage plans approved by the City and improvements completed for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility; however, grading and drainage plans will need to be approved by the City and improvements installed for any future phases.  Village of Hope The Hydrology Plan for the project was approved and construction is complete.  Master Development Footprint: TLCP previously prepared a Hydrology study for initial phases of the project. Drainage plans were submitted for City review in Neighborhood E and will be submitted with future entitlement applications for Neighborhoods B, D, and G as determined necessary. Grading and drainage plans approved by the City for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively, and construction is underway. (l) Prior to approval of any subdivision map Prior to approval City of Tustin Tustin Public  The District (except for financing or conveyance of any subdivision Works Agreement with OCFCD was executed on June 8, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 30 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility purposes), an agreement will be executed map (except for Department, 2004, and is on file with Public Works with the OCFCD that provides for the financing or Tustin Department. identification and contribution of a conveyance Community project-specific fair share contribution purposes). Redevelopment  Tustin Field I toward the construction of ultimate flood Agency Agreement with OCFCD executed on June 8, control facilities needed to accommodate 2004. build-out of the affected project. Interim flood control facilities may be considered  Tustin Field II for approval provided such facilities meet Agreement with OCFCD executed on June 8, OCFCD requirements. Nothing shall 2004. preclude the City of Tustin from transferring the obligation onto other  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) project developers within the project Agreement with OCFCD was executed on June 8, area. 2004, and is on file with Public Works Department.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Not applicable to this site.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Agreements have been executed for Phase I project; however, SOCCCD may need to contribute a project-specific fair share toward the construction of ultimate flood control facilities needed to accommodate build-out of the affected project if the primary use of future phases is not educational, which would not be exempted from this requirement.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Agreements have been executed. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 31 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Master Development Footprint Any requirements are determined at each entitlement application stage as determined necessary. DDAs have been executed for the St. Anton and Irvine company projects, which include fair share contribution provisions. Implementation Measures for Public Services and Facilities (m) General Prior to final map Project Tustin recordation or developer Community The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, building permit Development each within its respective jurisdiction, issuance. Department, shall ensure that adequate fire protection, Police police protection, libraries, and parks and Department, or recreation facilities (including Parks Department bikeways/trails) needed to adequately or the City of serve the reuse plan area shall be Irvine, and/or provided as necessary. To eliminate any OCFA, as negative impact the project could have appropriate on each community's general fund, financing mechanisms including but not limited to developer fees, assessment district financing, and/or tax increment financing (in the event that a redevelopment project area is created for the site), shall be developed and used as determined appropriate by each City. Specifically; MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 32 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (1) Applicants for private development  The District projects shall be required to enter A DDA was entered into identifying developer into an agreement with City of responsibilities. City and Vestar have completed Tustin or the City of Irvine, as formation of Community Facility District (CFD) applicable, to establish a fair-share No. 07-01 for public services (Special Tax B) and mechanism to provide needed fire for facilities (Tax A). and police protection services, libraries, and parks and recreation  Tustin Field I facilities (including bikeways) A DDA was entered into identifying developer through the use of fee schedules, responsibilities. City and developer completed assessment district financing, formation of CFD No. 04-01 which provided Fair Community Facility District share financing of public services (Special Tax B) financing, or other mechanisms as and facilities (Tax A). determined appropriate by each respective city.  Tustin Field II A DDA was entered into identifying developer responsibilities. City and developer completed formation of CFD No. 04-01 which provided Fair share financing of public services (Special Tax B) and facilities (Tax A).  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) A Cooperative Agreement was entered into with developer indentifying developer responsibilities. City and developer completed formation of CFD 06-1 which provided Fair Share financing of public services (Special Tax B) and facilities (Tax A). An Amendment to Fire Master Plan was approved and installation is complete.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) A Cooperative Agreement was entered into with MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 33 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility developer indentifying developer responsibilities. City and developer completed formation of CFD 06-1 which provided Fair Share financing of public services (Special Tax B) and facilities (Tax A). An Amendment to Fire Master Plan was approved and installation is in progress.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.as well as landscape maintenance easements.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project is complete. RSCCD capital improvement costs for this project are paid out of fair share backbone infrastructure fees. City has exempted RSCCD from City CFD funded infrastructure costs pursuant to Conveyance Agreement; however, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 34 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility RSCCD is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors if determined needed by those agencies.  Master Development Footprint: This development is currently in the planning stage. Any requirements are determined at each entitlement application stage as determined necessary. The City Council initiated establishing Community Facilities District 13-01, a special tax to cover services such as emergency response, police, recreation program, streets and sidewalks. (2) Recipients of property through Property  SOCCCD (ATEP) public conveyance process, or recipients Pursuant to the Development Agreement and other conveyance procedures, shall Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, be required to mitigate any impacts SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site of their public uses of property on improvements; however, the City has exempted public services and facilities. SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it (As amended by Addendum) requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The Sheriff’s Training Facility project is complete. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 35 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility RSCCD capital improvement costs for this project are paid out of fair share backbone infrastructure fees. City has exempted RSCCD from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs pursuant to a Settlement Agreement; however, RSCCD is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors.  Village of Hope Village of Hope capital improvement costs for this project are paid out of fair share backbone infrastructure fees. City has exempted Village of Hope from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs pursuant to a Conveyance Agreement; however, Village of Hope is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors as determined necessary. (n) The cities of Tustin and Irvine shall Ongoing prior to City of Tustin Community  Tustin Field I jointly consult and coordinate with the implementation of and City of Development On-site connection to the future trails has been Orange County Parks, Program Peters Canyon and Irvine Department provided. Cash bonds for future construction upon Management and Coordination Division, Barranca trails. (Tustin and/or completion of Orange County trail construction in preparation of trail designs for the Irvine, as have been submitted. Peters Canyon and Barranca trails within applicable) the reuse plan area. Improvements for  Tustin Field II each of these trails would be installed An Agreement was executed on June 8, 2004, upon completion of flood control channel between City and OCFCD. improvements and approval of their joint use by the OC Parks.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) An Agreement was executed between City and OCFCD on June 8, 2004 and included trail MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 36 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility improvement along Peters Canyon Channel to the north of the site.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) An Agreement was executed between City and OCFCD on June 8, 2004  Tustin Family Campus The Tustin Family Campus is not immediately adjacent to a trail system and did not implement a trail through the site.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD is not immediately adjacent to a trail system and did not implement a trail through the ATEP campus site.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD is not immediately adjacent to the Peters Canyon and Barranca trail system. A Class II bikeway will be installed by the City on Warner Avenue adjacent to the project.  Orange County Regional Park (OC Parks) In cooperation with OC Parks, evaluated proposals and recommended a firm to complete the General Development Plan for the 84 acre regional park.  Master Development Footprint The City is commencing with the Barranca Parkway and channel improvements between Tustin Ranch Road to west of Aston Street and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 37 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility anticipated to be completed by Spring 2014. Future developers will be assigned responsibility for construction of any required remaining trails identified in the Specific Plan and/or in the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program. (o) Fire Protection/Emergency Medical Prior to the first Project Tustin  Tustin Field I Services final map recorda-developer Community DDA 03-01 executed and CFD funded and no tion or building Redevelopment additional obligation required. Prior to the first final map recordation or permit issuance for Agency and the building permit issuance for development development City of Irvine  Tustin Field II (except for financing and re-conveyances (except for DDA 03-03 executed and CFD funded and no purposes), the project developer could be financing and re- additional obligation required. required to enter into an agreement with conveyances the City of Tustin or City of purposes).  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Irvine/OCFA, as applicable, to address Cooperative Agreement entered into and CFD impacts of the project on fire services. funded and no additional obligation required. Such agreement could include participation for fire protection,  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) personnel and equipment necessary to Cooperative Agreement entered into andCFD serve the project and eliminate any funded and no additional obligation required. negative impacts on fire protection services.  The District DDA entered into and CFD has been funded and no additional obligation required.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD received building permits via the Division of the State Architect for Phase I. No additional Fair Share Contribution toward Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure, including fire facilities required for educational uses. Pursuant to MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 38 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), including for Fire Services, and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD received building permits via the Division of the State Architect for the Sheriff’s Training Facility project. No additional Fair Share Contribution toward Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure, including fire facilities required for educational uses.  Master Development Footprint Future developers will be required to provide their Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure, including fire facilities, to address necessary fire protection and emergency medical service needs at Tustin Legacy. St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company have entered into the DDAs for MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 39 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively and have agreed to their fair share contribution. (p) Prior to issuance of building permits, the Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District project developer shall work closely with building permits. developer Development Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all the OCFA to ensure that adequate fire Department requirements installed. protection measures are implemented in (Tustin and/or the project. Irvine, as  Tustin Field I applicable) Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all requirements installed.  Tustin Field II Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA -installation completed.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Fire Master Plan approved and all requirements installed.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation in progress  Tustin Family Campus Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - construction is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Fire Master Plan for Phase 1 of project reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation complete; however, a complete Fire Master Plan for future MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 40 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility phases will need to be reviewed and approved by OCFA.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA for the Sheriff’s Training Facility project and installation complete; however, OCFA will need to review and approve any future phases of development.  Village of Hope Fire Master Plan approved and installation complete.  Master Development Footprint Developers will be required to ensure fire protection measures are implemented with each development, as applicable, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. (q) Prior to issuance of building permits for Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District phased projects, the project developer building permits developer Development Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all shall submit a construction phasing plan for phased Department requirements installed. to the OCFA demonstrating that projects. (Tustin and/or emergency vehicle access is adequate. Irvine, as  Tustin Field I applicable) Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all requirements installed. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 41 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Tustin Field II Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA -installation completed.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Fire Master Plan approved and all requirements installed.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation in progress  Tustin Family Campus Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - construction is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Fire Master Plan for Phase 1 of project reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation complete; however, a complete Fire Master Plan for future phases will need to be reviewed and approved by OCFA.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project and installation complete; however, OCFA will need to review and approve any future development plans. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 42 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Village of Hope Fire Master Plan approved and installation complete.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to address adequate emergency vehicle access is addressed with each development. Fire Master Plans for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company have been approved by the Orange County Fire Authority. (r) Prior to the issuance of building permits, Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District the project developer shall submit a fire building permits. developer Development Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all hydrant location plan for the review and Department requirements installed. approval of the Fire Chief and ensure that (Tustin and/or fire hydrants capable of flows in amounts Irvine, as  Tustin Field I approved by the OCFA are in place and applicable) Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all operational to meet fire flow requirements installed. requirements.  Tustin Field II Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA -installation completed.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Fire Master Plan approved by OCFA and all requirements installed.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation in progress and the project is near completion. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 43 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Tustin Family Campus Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA - construction is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Fire Master Plan for Phase 1 of project reviewed and approved by OCFA - installation complete; however, a complete Fire Master Plan for future phases will need to be reviewed and approved by OCFA.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Fire Master Plan reviewed and approved by OCFA for the Sheriff’s Training Facility and installation complete; however, OCFA will need to review and approve any future development plans.  Village of Hope Fire Master Plan approved and installation complete.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to address any specific requirements with each development at the building permit application stage, as applicable. St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company plans have been reviewed and approved by OCFA. (s) Police Protection Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District building permits. developer Development Development plans were reviewed and approved Prior to issuance of building permits, the Department by Tustin Police Department MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 44 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility project developer shall work closely with (Tustin and / or  Tustin Field I the respective Police Department to Irvine, as All development plans were approved by Tustin ensure that adequate security precautions applicable) Police Department are implemented in the project.  Tustin Field II All plans were reviewed and approved by Tustin Police Department.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) All plans reviewed and approved by the Tustin Police Department.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) All plans were reviewed and approved by the Tustin Police Department.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The Tustin Police Department reviewed the Phase 1 project; however, the Tustin Police Department will need to review all future phases.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The Tustin Police Department reviewed the project.  Village of Hope Development plans received to date were reviewed by Tustin Police Department.  Master Development Footprint Developer(s) will be required to address any specific requirements with each development at the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 45 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility entitlement application stage, as applicable. The Tustin Police Department reviewed and approved the plans for St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. (t) Schools Prior to the Project Community  The District issuance of developer Development School fees were collected prior to issuance of Prior to the issuance of building permits, building permits. Department building permits. the project developer shall submit to the (Tustin and/or respective City proof of payment of Irvine, as  Tustin Field I appropriate school fees adopted by the applicable) School fees were collected prior to issuance of applicable school district pursuant to building permits. Government Code Section 65995. Alternatively, a project developer may  Tustin Field II enter into a mutual agreement with an All fees were collected prior to issuance of applicable school district to provide building permits. alternative mitigation that addresses student generation increases.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) (As amended by Addendum) School permit fees are collected with issuance of each permit.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) School permit fees are collected with issuance of each building permit.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The project is a school district and no fees were required. Future phases involving non-educational users are subject to school fees. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 46 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  RSCCD (Sheriff) The project is part of a school district and no fees were required.  Master Development Footprint Developer(s) are required to pay school fees for each development, as applicable, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company, prior to permit issuance. (u) Parks and Recreation Prior to the first Project Tustin  Tustin Field I final map recorda-developer Community A recreation building and park facilities were Prior to the first final map recordation tion (except for Development constructed within a one acre site within the (except for financing and re-conveyance financing and re-Department and project (developer was given credit for these purposes) or building permit issuance for conveyance Parks and improvements) and additional Park in-lieu fees development within the City of Tustin purposes) or Recreation were also paid. Developer also made a Fair Share portion of the site, the project developer building permit Department Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone shall be required to provide evidence of issuance. Infrastructure which included public parks at compliance with all requirements and Tustin Legacy. standards of the City of Tustin Park Code.  Tustin Field II A recreation pool area and park facilities were constructed within a one acre site within the project (developer was given credit for these improvements and additional Park in-lieu of fees were paid. Developer also made a Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which included public parks at Tustin Legacy.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Parks plan approved and under construction MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 47 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (developer was given a credit for these improvements and additional Park – in lieu fees paid and bonds submitted (on file with City Clerk). Developer also made a Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which included public parks at Tustin Legacy.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Park plans approved and construction in progress (developer was given credit for these improvements and additional Park– in-lieu fees paid and bonds submitted. Developer also made a Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which included public parks at Tustin Legacy.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The project did not require a contribution to park facilities for educational uses. However, any non- educational uses will be required to make a Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which includes public parks at Tustin Legacy.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The project did not require a contribution to park facilities.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to comply with all requirements and standards of the City of Tustin Quimby Act ordinance with each MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 48 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility development, as applicable. Developers will also be required to make e a Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which includes public parks (with a credit for any Quimby Act dedications or fees paid). St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively will construct a focal park in addition to their respective recreation building and pool area.  Focal Park 4.7 Acres (St. Anton Partners) As part of the development of MCAS Tustin Disposition Package 1A, reviewed the Preliminary Landscape Plan submitted by St. Anton Partners for a proposed 4.7 neighborhood park for public use as part of a 225 multi-unit development. (v) Prior to the first final map recordation or Prior to the first Project Irvine Not applicable to any development projects at building permit issuance within the City final map recorda-developer Community Tustin Legacy in Tustin. of Irvine portion of the site, the project tion (except for Development developer shall be required to provide financing and re-Department evidence of compliance with all conveyance requirements and standards of the City of purposes) or Irvine Park Code. building permit issuance. (w) Prior to the first concept plan for Prior to the first Project Tustin Public  The District tentative tract map in the City of Tustin, concept plan for developer Works Landscaped Maintenance obligations of the the project developer shall file a petition tentative tract map. Department; developer immediately adjacent to the project are for the creation of a landscape Tustin secured by a landscape maintenance agreement maintenance district for the project area Community MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 49 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility with the City of Tustin. The district shall Redevelopment (parkways adjacent to the site) and maintenance include public neighborhood parks, Agency conditions have been included and recorded with landscape improvements, and specific CC&Rs. City and developer have completed trails (Barranca only), the medians in formation of CFD No. 07-01 which imposes a arterials, or other eligible items mutually public service assessment for maintenance of agreed to by the petitioner and the City medians, parks, landscaping and other public of Tustin. In the event that a district is services (Special Tax B). not established prior to issuance of the first building permit, maintenance of  Tustin Field I items mentioned above shall be the Landscaped Maintenance obligations of the responsibility of a community developer immediately adjacent to the project are association. secured by a landscape maintenance agreement (parkways adjacent to the site) and maintenance conditions have been included and recorded with CC&Rs. City and developer have completed formation of CFD No. 04-01 which imposes a public service assessment for maintenance of medians, parks, landscaping and other public services (Special Tax B).  Tustin Field II Landscaped Maintenance obligations of the developer immediately adjacent to the project are secured by a landscape maintenance agreement (parkways adjacent to the site) and maintenance conditions have been included and recorded with CC&Rs. City and developer have completed formation of CFD No. 04-01 which imposes a public service assessment for maintenance of medians, parks, landscaping and other public services (Special Tax B). MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 50 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Landscaped Maintenance obligations of the developer immediately adjacent to the project are secured by a landscape maintenance agreement (parkways adjacent to the site) and maintenance conditions have been included and recorded with CC&Rs. City and developer have completed formation of CFD No. 06-01 which imposes a public service assessment for maintenance of medians, parks, landscaping and other public services (Special Tax B).  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Landscaped Maintenance obligations of the developer immediately adjacent to the project are secured by a landscape maintenance agreement (parkways adjacent to the site) and maintenance conditions have been included and recorded with CC&Rs. City and developer have completed formation of CFD No. 06-01 which imposes a public service assessment for maintenance of medians, parks. landscaping and other public services (Special Tax B).  Tustin Family Campus Orange County Social Services is responsible for maintenance of parkway landscaping adjacent to their property as a condition of the City’s design review approval of their project and subject to the Agreement between the City and County for the Tustin Family Center. Public agencies have been determined by City Council policy to be exempt MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 51 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility from any CFD special taxes for public services provided the uses on said sites are public uses.  SOCCCD (ATEP) SOCCCD will be responsible for maintenance of parkway landscaping adjacent to their property as a condition of the City’s concept plan and design review approvals of their project (by individual phases) and subject to the Conveyance Agreement between the City and SOCCCD. A phase 1 Landscape Maintenance Agreement has been entered into. Public agencies have been determined by City Council policy to be exempt from any CFD special taxes for public services provided the uses on said sites are public uses (Land Use Category 1); however, an obligation for Land Use Category 2 uses to contribute to any public service costs for maintenance of medians, parks, landscaping and other public services will be required.  RSCCD (Sheriff) RSCCCD will be responsible for maintenance of parkway landscaping adjacent to their property as condition of the City’s reviews and approvals. Public agencies have been determined by City Council policy to be exempt from any CFD special taxes for public services provided the uses on said sites are public uses.  Master Development Footprint Developer(s) will be required to be responsible MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 52 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility for maintenance of parkway landscaping adjacent to development sites as a condition imposed at the entitlement stage. Further, each project will be required to participate in any future CFD, including CFD 13-01, imposed on the property to cover infrastructure and for maintenance of medians, parks, landscaping and other public services as a condition imposed at the entitlement stage, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. (x) Prior to approval of any subdivision Prior to approval Project Community  Tustin Field I map (except for financing or of any subdivision developer Development City entered into an Agreementwith the OCFCD conveyance purposes), an agreement map (except for Department and Orange County Parks executed on June 8, will be executed with the following financing or (Tustin and/or 2004 (on file with PW) which addresses these agencies for the associated trail conveyance Irvine, as obligations. Developer has also made their Fair improvements: purposes). applicable) Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered a. County Parks — identification of into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement a project-specific fair share associated with CFD 04-01. contribution toward the installation of necessary regional  Tustin Field II bikeway trail improvements City entered into an Agreementwith the OCFCD within Peters Canyon Channel, to and Orange County Parks executed on June 8, be installed in conjunction with 2004 (on file with PW) which addresses these the County of Orange's other obligations. Developer has also made their Fair channel improvements; Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 04-01. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 53 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) City entered into an Agreementwith the OCFCD and Orange County Parks executed on June 8, 2004 (on file with PW) which addresses these obligations. Developer has also made their Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 06-01.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) City entered into an Agreementwith the OCFCD and Orange County Parks executed on June 8, 2004 (on file with PW) which addresses these obligations. Developer has also made their Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 06-01.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Requirement fulfilled for Phase I project. Any future non-educational users (Land Use Category 2) will be subject to a project specific Fair Share Contribution toward the installation of necessary regional bikeway trail improvements included in the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Requirement fulfilled. Public uses exempt by City Council policy from a fair share contribution MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 54 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility towards these improvements, so no agreement necessary.  Village of Hope Requirement fulfilled. Public and non-profit uses exempt by City Council policy from a fair share contribution towards these improvements, so no agreement is necessary.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to make a Fair Share Contribution towards these improvements, as applicable, and at future entitlement application stages of the project, the requirement will also be imposed, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. b. City of Tustin — the identification Prior to the first Project Tustin  The District of a project-specific fair share final map developer Community City entered into DDAwith developer which contribution toward the recordation Development addresses these obligations. Developer has also installation of Class II bicycle (except for Department made their Fair Share Contribution towards the trails through the project site. For financing and re-and/or Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program the area of the site northeast of conveyance SCRRA/OCTA, and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Irvine Center Drive, a separate purposes) or as appropriate Agreement associated with CFD 07-01. Developer agreement would be required to building permit has completed an off-site bikeway trail on the ensure the provision of a bikeway issuance. north side of Barranca Parkway between Jamboree right-of-way easement, and design Road and Tustin Ranch Road. and construction of a bike trail along the SCRRA/OCTA rail  Tustin Field I tracks from Harvard Avenue City entered into a DDAwith developer which MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 55 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility westerly to the Peters Canyon addresses these obligations. Developer has also Channel. In addition, project made their Fair Share Contribution towards the developers of the areas of the site Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program southeast of the Peters Canyon and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Channel would need to Agreement associated with CFD 04-01. The accommodate access to both the specific Bike trail on the north side of the project Peters Canyon Trail and the trail was designed and approved. The public bid was adjacent to the SCRRA/OCTA awarded December, 2005 and the project was tracks in any project site design completed in September 2006. including dedication of any necessary recreational trail  Tustin Field II easements; City entered into a DDAwith developer which addresses these obligations. Developer has also made their Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 04-01. The specific on-site pedestrian access from the site to future trail along Peters Canyon is complete. Construction of the future Peters Canyon Trail within Tustin will be the responsibility of one or more future developers as determined through future entitlements with other developers of the former Master Developer footprint. The portion within Irvine is a Moffett Meadows and Marble Mountain (Lennar) responsibility that was imposed on this developer by the City of Irvine with their entitlements.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) City entered into a Cooperative Agreementwith developer which addresses the obligations. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 56 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Developer has also made their current Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 06-01. Responsibility for actual construction of the trail on the North side of Tustin Field 1 and on the west sided of Tustin Field 1 and II has been placed on others.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) City entered into a Cooperative Agreementwith developer which addresses these obligations. Developer has also made their Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and entered into an Acquisition and Funding Agreement associated with CFD 06-01. Responsibility for actual construction of the trail on the North side of Tustin Field 1 and on the west sided of Tustin Field 1 and II has been placed on others.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. Since Phase 1 is a public use, no obligations required. .Any future non-educational users (Land Use Category 2) will be subject to a project-specific Fair Share Contribution toward the installation of Class II bicycle trails through the larger Tustin Legacy project and any applicable MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 57 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility CFD assessments for said improvements.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. The RSCCCD project is a public use, no obligations required.  Master Development Footprint: Future developer(s) will be responsible for any required Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program as a condition also imposed at the entitlement stage. Further, projects will be required to participate in any future CFD imposed on the property(ies) to cover infrastructure, maintenance and public services as a condition imposed at the entitlement stage, as applicable, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. c. City of Tustin — the identification Prior to the first Project Tustin  The District of a project specific fair share final map recorda-developer Community A Fair Share Contribution was made by contribution toward installation of tion (except for Development developer as condition of the DDA and funding Class I bikeway trail financing and re- Department provided partially from CFD 07-01 proceeds. improvements northerly of conveyance Class I bikeway along Barranca Parkway was Barranca Parkway after purposes) or constructed by the project developer. completion of the Barranca building permit Channel improvements. For issuance. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 58 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility proposed developments adjacent  Tustin Field I to Barranca Channel, separate A Fair Share Contribution was made by agreements would be required to developer as condition of the DDA and with ensure the establishment of a CFD 04-01. Actual improvements constructed bikeway right-of-way easement by others. between Jamboree Road and Red Hill Avenue.  Tustin Field II A Fair Share Contribution was made by developer as condition of the DDA and with CFD 04-01. Actual improvements constructed by others.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) A Fair Share Contribution was made by developer as condition of the DDA and with CFD 04-01. Actual improvements constructed by others.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) A Fair Share Contribution was made by developer as condition of the DDA and with CFD 04-01. Actual improvements constructed by others.  Tustin Family Campus Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. Since Tustin Family Campus is a public use, no obligations required.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 59 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. Since Phase 1 is a public use, no obligations required. Any future non-educational users (Land Use Category 2) will be subject to a project-specific Fair Share Contribution toward the improvements through the larger Tustin Legacy project and any applicable CFD assessments for said improvements.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. The RSCCCD project is a public use, no obligations required.  Village of Hope Public uses are exempt by City Council policy from Fair Share Contributions towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program and any infrastructure assessments imposed by Tustin Legacy CFD’s. The RSCCCD project is a public use, no obligations required.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to be responsible for a Fair Share contribution towards construction of Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure which will include trails and any required CFD assessments at the entitlement MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 60 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility application stage, as applicable, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. The City is currently constructing the Barranca Parkway and channel improvements and anticipated to be completed by Spring 2014. Mitigation Measures for Aesthetics Vis-1 In conjunction with any zoning Prior to the first City of Tustin Community  The District ordinance amendments to implement final map recorda-and City of Development Included in construction plans – installation the reuse plan in Tustin or Irvine, an tion (except for Irvine Department complete. urban design plan shall be adopted to financing and re- (Tustin and/or provide for distinct and cohesive conveyance Irvine, as  Tustin Field II architectural and landscape design, purposes) or applicable) Included in construction plans – installation features and treatments, as well as building permit completed. harmony with adjacent landscaping. issuance. The urban design plan shall have the  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) following elements: Included in construction plans – installation in landscaping concept and master  progress. signage plan; design review and approval process;   Columbus Square (Tract 16581) limits on development intensity for  Included in construction plans – installation in each specific land use; progress. limits on height of structures and lot  coverage;  SOCCCD (ATEP) minimum site building setbacks;  Phase 1 ofthe project was reviewed for minimum on-site landscaping  compliance with the requirements of the MCAS requirements; Tustin Specific Plan; however, all future phases buffering requirements, including  will need to be reviewed for compliance with the berms, masonry walls, and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 61 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility landscaping; MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. lighting regulations, including  regulations ensuring that exterior  Village of Hope lighting does not Included in construction plans – installation negatively impact surrounding complete.  property; screening regulations for mechanical   Tustin Family Campus equipment and outside storage; Included in construction plans – installation and, complete. site signage requirements, including  sign permit approval.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The Sheriff’s Training Facility project was reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, and any future development phases will also be subject to compliance with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be responsible for any required urban design plan including cohesive architectural and landscape design. St. Anton and the Irvine Company included these design elements in their approved construction drawings – currently under construction. Mitigation Measures for Cultural and Paleontological Resources Hist-1 Historic American Building Survey Prior to Department of Department of the Complete (HABS) - DON will complete the conveyance to City the Navy Navy appropriate recordation for hangars 28 of Tustin and 29 and the discontiguous historic MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 62 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility district prior to conveyance of any property within the discontiguous historic district and shall ensure that copies of the recordation are made available to SHPO, the City of Tustin, and any local or other archive facilities designated by SHPO. Hist-2 Curation - within 30 days of the Within 30 days of Department of Department of the Complete execution of the MOA, Department of the execution of the Navy Navy the Navy will distribute copies of plans the MOA and architectural drawings and other archival materials and records, as available, concerning the layout and the buildings and structures that made up the original Navy lighter-than-air blimp facility to a local curation facility. The City of Tustin or its designee will also be provided with copies of these materials. Arch-Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Prior to issuance of Project Tustin  Tustin Field I (location of 4 acre site) 1 four-acre parcel currently outside the grading permits. developer Community A paleontologist contract was executed prior to boundaries of the Air Station along Development grading. During grading, a cultural resource was Harvard Avenue shall be surveyed to Department exposedand handled per plan. The monitoring of determine the presence/absence of the site and evaluation of the object was done by archaeological resources prior to grading. SWCA in contract with JLH and all correspondence on file with CDD. Arch-Prior to issuance of grading permits, Prior to issuance Project Community  Tustin Field I 2 the cities of Tustin and Irvine shall of grading Developer Development During grading, archeological resources were MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 63 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility each require applicants of individual permits. Department exposed and handled per plan paleontologist plan development projects to retain, as (Tustin and/or on file with CDD appropriate, a county-certified Irvine, as archaeologist. If buried resources are applicable)  Tustin Field II found during grading within the reuse Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file plan area, a qualified archaeologist with CDD would need to assess the site significance and perform the  The District appropriate mitigation. The Native Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file American view point shall be with CDD considered during this process. This could include testing or data recovery.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Native American consultation shall Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file also be initiated during this process. with CDD  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file with CDD  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD retained an archaeologist for the Sheriff’s Training Facility project construction; however, an archaeologist will also need to be obtained for construction of any future phases.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD retained an archaeologist for project construction of Phase 1; however, an archaeologist will also need to be obtained for construction of any future phases. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 64 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Village of Hope The Village of Hope retained an archaeologist for project construction.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to retain an archeologist for each project, as applicable, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. The City has retained an archaeologist for the duration of the Tustin Ranch Road project from Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue, Armstrong Avenue project from Barranca Parkway to Warner Avenue, Warner Avenue project from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road and Disposition Areas 2B, 2C and 8 grading project. -Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Prior to issuance of City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint AR-1 City of Tustin shall retain, as appropriate, a grading permit Development The City has retained an archaeologist for the a county-certified archaeologist. If (for the Tustin Department duration of the Tustin Ranch Road project from buried resources are found during Ranch Road Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue. Grading for grading within the portion of the site Extension project) the Tustin Ranch Road roadway is complete. located north of Edinger Avenue, a qualified archaeologist would need to assess the site significance and perform the appropriate mitigation. The Native American viewpoint shall be considered during this process. This could include testing or data recovery. Native American consultation shall also be initiated during this process. (As MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 65 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility amended by Final Supplement #1) Hist-3 As specified in the MOA, a substantive Ongoing, prior to City of Tustin Tustin The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a effort will be made to determine whether making substantial and County of Community concept plan to reuse Hangar 28 and the surrounding there is an economically viable adaptive changes to Hangar Orange Redevelopment area as an 84.5-acre regional park that includes a use of Hangar 28 and Hangar 29. 28 or Hangar 29. Agency variety of active and passive recreational uses such as picnic areas, trails, plazas, and courts for basketball, volleyball, tennis and handball. The County staff has developed a draft General Development Plan for Board consideration in 2014/2015. The City is currently in the process of assessing adaptive reuse of Hangar 29. Hist-4 If the marketing effort identifies an Prior to making Department of Tustin The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a economically viable adaptive use of substantial changes the Navy Community concept plan to reuse Hangar 28 and the surrounding either of the complexes, that complex to Hangar 28 or Development area as an 84.5-acre regional park that includes a will be encumbered by a historic Hangar 29. Department variety of active and passive recreational uses such as preservation covenant. In the case of the picnic areas, trails, plazas, and courts for basketball, Hangar 28 complex, these measures shall volleyball, tennis and handball. The County staff has balance the needs of the adaptive use and developed a draft General Development Plan for the needs for effective operation of the Board consideration in 2014/2015. The City is Federal Lands to Parks or Historic currently in the process of assessing adaptive reuse of Monument programs. Hangar 29. Hist-5 If NPS and/or SHPO determine that, despite a marketing effort that complies with the terms of the MOA or as agreed to by the City of Tustin/County of Orange, NPS, and/or SHPO, an economically viable adaptive use of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 66 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Hangar 28 complex was not identified, NPS and/or SHPO shall promptly advise Department of the Navy and notify the City of Tustin/County of Orange that the following measures are required. a. Written History - The City of Prior to making Department of NPS, SHPO, and Cooperative efforts between the City and the County Tustin/County of Orange shall substantial changes the Navy Department of the are completed. The completed written history is on prepare an illustrated history report to Hangar 28. Navy file with the City of Tustin and County of Orange. on MCAS TUSTIN, with emphasis on the initial construction of the Air Station and its World War II Navy lighter-than-air operations. b. Exhibit - The City of Tustin/County Cooperative efforts between the City and the County of Orange shall prepare a are completed. The finished interpretive exhibits are professional-quality illustrated available for use and rotation for public displays from interpretive exhibit with emphasis the City of Tustin and County of Orange. on the initial construction of the air station and its World War II Navy lighter-than-air operations. c. Interpretive Video - The City of Cooperative efforts between the City and the County Tustin/County of Orange shall are completed. Copies of the finished interpretive prepare a professional-quality video are on file with the City of Tustin and County documentary video and shall of Orange and on the City’s web site at tustinca.org. undertake a one-time distribution and outreach program for the documentary video. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 67 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Paleo-The cities of Tustin and Irvine shall each Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District 1 require applicants of individual grading permits. developer Development A copy of contract and paleontologist plan are on development projects to comply with the Department file with CDD requirements established in a PRMP (Tustin and/or prepared for the site, which details the Irvine, as  Tustin Field I methods to be used for surveillance of applicable) SWCA Environmental consultant were retained by construction grading, assessing finds, JLH during grading (contract is on file with CDD) and actions to be taken in the event that unique paleontological resources are  Tustin Field II discovered during construction. SWCA Environmental consultant were retained by JLH during grading (contract is on file with CDD)  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) A copy of contract and paleontologist plan are on file with CDD  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) A copy of contract and paleontologist plan are on file with CDD  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD shall be required to retain a paleontologist for all phased ATEP construction.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD retained a paleontologist for the Sheriff’s Training Facility project construction; however, a paleontologist will also need to be obtained for construction of any future phases.  Village of Hope The Village of Hope retained a paleontologist for MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 68 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the project construction.  Tustin Family Campus The County of Orange retained a paleontologist for the project construction.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to retain a paleontologist for each project, as applicable. A copy of each contract and paleontologist plan will be required to be kept on file at the City, including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A- North and 2A, respectively. The City has retained a paleontologist for the duration of the Tustin Ranch Road project from Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue, Armstrong Avenue project from Barranca Parkway to Warner Avenue, Warner Avenue project from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road and Disposition Areas 2B, 2C and 8 grading projects. Paleo-Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District 2 project applicants shall provide written grading permits. developer Development Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file evidence to each city, that a county- Department with CDD certified paleontologist has been retained (Tustin and/or to conduct salvage excavation of unique Irvine, as  Tustin Field I paleontological resources if they are applicable) The contract with SWCA included the found. requirements (contract on file with CDD)  Tustin Field II The contract with SWCA included the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 69 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility requirements (contract on file with CDD)  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file with CDD  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Copy of contract and paleontologist plan on file with CDD  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD shall be required to retain a paleontologist for all phased ATEP construction.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD retained a paleontologist for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project construction; however, a paleontologist will also need to be obtained for construction of any future phases.  Village of Hope The Village of Hope retained a paleontologist for the project construction.  Tustin Family Campus The County of Orange retained a paleontologist for the project construction.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to retain a paleontologist for each project, as applicable, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 70 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. The City has retained a paleontologist for the Tustin Ranch Road project from Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue, Armstrong Avenue project from Barranca Parkway to Warner Avenue, Warner Avenue project from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road and Disposition Areas 2B, 2C and 8 grading projects. A copy of each contract and paleontologist plan will be required to be kept on file at the City. PR-1 The City of Tustin shall comply with the During grading City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint requirements established in the and construction Development Future developer(s) will be required to retain a Paleontological Resources Management activities. Department paleontologist for each project and implement Plan (PRMP) prepared for the Base, methods to be used in the PRMP if unique which details the methods to be used for resources as discovered, as applicable, including surveillance of construction grading, St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company assessing finds, and actions to be taken in pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A- the event that unique paleontological North and 2A, respectively. The City has retained resources are discovered during a paleontologist for the Tustin Ranch Road project construction. (As amended by Final from Warner Avenue to Walnut Avenue, Supplement #1 - for the Tustin Ranch Armstrong Avenue project from Barranca Road Extension project) Parkway to Warner Avenue, Warner Avenue project from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road and Disposition Areas 2B, 2C and 8 grading projects. A copy of each contract and paleontologist plan will be required to be kept on file at the City. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 71 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility PR-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint the City shall retain a county-certified issuance of a Development Future developer(s) will be required to retain a paleontologist to conduct salvage grading permit. Department paleontologist for each project, as applicable, excavation of unique paleontological including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine resources if they are found. Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. The City has retained a paleontologist for the Tustin Ranch (As amended by Final Supplement #1- Road project from Warner Avenue to Walnut for the Tustin Ranch Road Extension Avenue, Armstrong Avenue project from Barranca project) Parkway to Warner Avenue, Warner Avenue project from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road and Disposition Areas 2B, 2C and 8 grading projects. A copy of each contract and paleontologist plan will be required to be kept on file at the City. Mitigation Measures for Biological Resources Bio-1 The project proponents of any Prior to issuance of Project Tustin  The District development affecting jurisdictional grading permits or developer Community Required permits have been obtained. waters of the U.S. or vegetated wetlands any public Development shall obtain Section 401, Section 404, improvements Department  SOCCCD (ATEP) Section 1602, and other certifications, within pond turtle and/or OCFCD, Regional permits not required for Phase 1of approvals and permits as necessary. habitat. as appropriate project; however, applicable regional permits for Copies of the necessary state and federal mitigation of any jurisdictional waters will be permits shall be provided to the City obtained prior to development of future phases, as prior to the issuance of mass or grading applicable. permits for grading activities impacting jurisdictional areas. A replacement ratio  RSCCD (Sheriff) for affected wetland resources shall be Required permits have been obtained. determined in consultation with regulatory agencies as part of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 72 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility permitting process and shall be no less  Master Development Footprint than 1:1 replacement of function and TLCP previously obtained the applicable 401, value. Additional criteria and 404, and 1602 permits; however, the requirements will be as follows: proportionate portions of the permit  Create (establish), restore, or enhance responsibilities affecting construction of Peters wetland/riparian habitats on-site to Canyon Channel improvements between Tustin the maximum extent practicable to City limits southerly to Barranca Parkway were minimize and replace the on-site loss transferred directly from TLCP to Tustin Vista of USACE and CDFG jurisdictional Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability acreage and function, or off-site as company, on May 6, 2008. Upon termination of may be permitted by the USACE and the DDA between the City and TLCP in July 2010, CDFG. the 401, 404, and 1062 permits affecting the  Master Development Footprint in the City of To return jurisdictional habitats that Tustin were assigned to the City of Tustin until are temporarily disturbed during such time the permit(s) and/or applicable construction to pre-construction mitigation responsibilities are assigned to conditions. subsequent developer(s) in the future. To provide for maintenance, management and monitoring of the mitigation site or sites for a minimum of three years as determined through the permitting process. (As amended by Addendum) Bio-2 Based on consultations with CDFG, Prior to issuance of City of Tustin Tustin  The District City of Tustin, or a project proponent grading permits or and/or project Community CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and as applicable, an off-site relocation site any public developer, as Development mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have for southwestern pond turtles captured improvements appropriate Department been relocated. on site shall be identified that is as within pond turtle close to the Reuse Plan area as possible habitat. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 73 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility and that is sustainable in perpetuity.  SOCCCD (ATEP) (No appropriate habitat in the City of The SOCCCD would be responsible for Tustin is available for relocation.) arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any Potential relocation sites include but found turtles. are not limited to a turtle pond and relocation site located in upper Shady  RSCCD (Sheriff) Canyon within the Orange County The RSCCD would be responsible for Nature Preserve; or the San Joaquin arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any Marsh, which is managed by UC found turtles. Irvine, Irvine Ranch, and the Orange County Water District. Some property  Master Development Footprint owners and public agencies may be TLCP previously completed a pond turtle survey adverse to the relocation of species of and CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and special concern onto their property or mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have jurisdiction, and it would be been relocated. speculative to identify actual sites prior to completion of consultation with CDFG and with potential property owners and/or appropriate public agencies. A relocation and mitigation plan shall be prepared by a qualified biologist for approval by the CDFG. The relocation and mitigation plan shall include the following:  Requirement for focused surveys for southwestern pond turtles prior to construction activities and submittal of survey report to the CDFG.  Identification of specific relocation site within the Newport Bay watershed.  Methodology for trapping, capture, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 74 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility recordation and release of southwestern pond turtles.  Requirement of biological monitoring during construction and requirement for capture and relocation by a qualified biologist of any additional southwestern pond turtles observed during construction. (As amended by Addendum) Bio-3 Permits from the CDFG shall be obtained Prior to issuance of Project Tustin  The District for live-capture of the turtles and for grading permits or developer Community CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and transporting them to the relocation site. any public Development mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have improvements Department been relocated. within pond turtle habitat.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The SOCCCD would be responsible for arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any turtles found.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD would be responsible for arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any found.  Master Development Footprint TLCP previously completed a pond turtle survey and CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have been relocated. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 75 2013 Annual Report MMRP ehS(  )ffirehS( DCCSR Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Bio-4 A project proponent shall negotiate with Ongoing City of Tustin Tustin  The District the CDFG or other agency or and/or project Community CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and organization as appropriate, for developer, as Development mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have relocation of turtles and/or contribution appropriate Department been relocated. of funds to improve, restore, or create a relocation site as turtle habitat, in  SOCCCD (ATEP) conjunction with any regulatory permits The SOCCCD would be responsible for necessary. arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any turtles found. (As amended by Addendum)  RSCCD (Sheriff) The RSCCD would be responsible for arrangements with CDFG for relocation of any found.  Master Development Footprint TLCP previously completed a pond turtle survey and CDFG approved a pond turtle relocation and mitigation plan for the project; all turtles have been relocated. Mitigation Measures for Traffic/Circulation T/C-1 Construction Prior to site Project Public Works  The District development developer Department Traffic Management Plan reviewed and approved In conjunction with the approval of a site permit. (Tustin or Irvine, and construction has been completed. development permit, the City of Tustin as applicable) and the City of Irvine, as applicable (for  Tustin Field I that portion of the reuse plan within Traffic Management Plan reviewed and approved Irvine), shall require each developer to and construction has been completed. provide traffic operations and control MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 76 2013 Annual Report MMRP r )ffi Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility plans that would minimize the traffic  Tustin Field II impacts of proposed construction Traffic Management Plan reviewed and approved activity. The plans shall address and construction has been completed roadway and lane closures, truck hours and routes, and notification procedures  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) for planned short-term or interim changes Traffic management plan reviewed and approved in traffic patterns. The City of Tustin and construction has been completed. and the City of Irvine, as applicable, shall ensure that the plan would minimize  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) anticipated delays at major intersections. Traffic improvement plan reviewed and Prior to approval, the City of Tustin or approved and construction has been completed. the City of Irvine, as applicable shall review the proposed traffic control and  Tustin Family Campus operations plans with any affected Routes provided to and approved by Public Works. jurisdiction.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Routes provided to and approved by Public Works for Phase 1 of the project; however, all routes for future phases will need to be provided to and approved by Public Works.  RSCCD Routes provided to and approved by Public Works for the initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project; however, all routes for future phases will need to be provided to and approved by Public Works.  Amalfi Apartment Homes – Irvine Company Street improvement plans have been designed and approved and is under construction. The City will monitor construction activities for compliance with approved plans and procedures. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 77 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Anton Legacy – St. Anton Partners Street improvement plans have been designed and approved and is under construction. The City will monitor construction activities for compliance with approved plans and procedures.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to provide traffic management plan to be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction activity. T/C-2 Development Prior to issuance of Project Public Works MCAS Tustin Specific Plan “Trips” are monitored for certificates of developer Department compliance with ADT Thresholds by Public Works The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, occupancy. (Tustin or Irvine, Department on an ongoing basis as projects are as applicable (for that portion of the as applicable) entitled. reuse plan area within Irvine), shall ensure that the arterial intersection  The District improvements required in 2005 and 2020 Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; the and as indicated in Tables 4.12-7 and project ADT does not exceed thresholds identified 4.12-9 of the Final EIS/EIR are in the FEIS/EIR as amended by the Supplemental implemented for their respective Agreement between the Cities of Irvine and Tustin jurisdictions according to the cumulative dated February 22, 2001, for off-site mitigation at ADT thresholds identified in each table arterial intersections. The traffic study determined and according to the fair share basis the need for a traffic signal at Park Avenue and noted. The ADT threshold represents the District Drive. Construction of this traffic signal is traffic volume which would result in an complete. impact and the fair share percentage reflects the percent of the traffic impact  Tustin Field I resulting from the reuse generated traffic. Traffic Management Plan reviewed and approved In some cases, reuse traffic would and construction is complete generate 100 percent of the impact, thereby assuming full financial  Tustin Field II MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 78 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility responsibility for the identified Staff received final traffic study addressing improvements. In other cases, reuse cumulative ADT thresholds and fair share traffic would generate only a fraction of responsibility for mitigation improvements; traffic the traffic impacting the intersection and study determined need for traffic signal at Edinger financial responsibility would Avenue/Aviation Drive and at Moffett correspond. Avenue/Meridian Street. Construction is complete.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Staff received final traffic study addressing cumulative ADT thresholds and fair share responsibility for mitigation improvements; traffic study determined need for modification of the traffic signal at Harvard Avenue and Moffet Avenue. Plans for off-site improvement reviewed and approved. Construction is complete.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Staff received final traffic study addressing cumulative ADT thresholds and fair share responsibility for mitigation improvements; traffic study determined need for two (2) traffic signals at Kensington Park Drive and Georgia Street and Valencia/Columbus Square Street; Improvement Plans reviewed and approved. Construction is complete.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The trip count for the ATEP is based on square feet. The project is within the “Learning Village” trip budget identified in the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan allocated to Phase 1 of the project; however, trip counts for future phases will be monitored by MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 79 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the City pursuant to the Development Agreement and Amended and Restated (Conveyance) Agreement.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The trip counts for the initial Learning Village are based on square feet. The Sheriff’s Training Facility project, in addition to other approved projects within the Education Village (ATEP), is withinthe EIS/EIR trip budget. Any future phases will need to comply with the maximum development permitted on the site by the ADT budget.  Master Developer Footprint Developers will be required to provide traffic studies for each neighborhood, as applicable, as planned are developed. T/C-3 The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, See Table 4.12-8 Project Public Works  The District (Vestar/Kimco) as applicable (for that portion of the of the Final developer Department The DDA addresses developers required Fair reuse plan area within Irvine), shall EIS/EIR for each (Tustin or Irvine, Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy contribute, on a fair share basis, to specific triggering as applicable) Backbone Infrastructure Program, as well as an improvements to freeway ramp mechanism. implementing Infrastructure Construction and intersections as listed in Table 4.12-8 of Payment Agreement (as amended), entitlement the Final EIS/EIR. The method of conditions of approval and CFD No. 07-01. implementing improvements, e.g., Required improvements have been completed. restriping, ramp widening, shall be based on special design studies, in association  Tustin Field I with Caltrans. The DDA addresses developers required Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program, entitlement MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 80 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility conditions of approval and CFD No. 04-01.  Tustin Field II The DDA addresses developers required Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program, entitlement conditions of approval, and CFD No. 04-01.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) The Cooperative Agreement with developer addresses the required Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure, the conditions of entitlement conditions for the project, and CFD No. 06-01.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) The Cooperative Agreement with developer addresses the required Fair Share Contribution towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure, the conditions of entitlement conditions for the project, and CFD No. 06-01.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it requires payment of its fairshare of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 81 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Based on City Council Policy and provisions of the Conveyance Agreement, SOCCCD is exempt from required Fair Share Contributions towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure since the use is public educational.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to make the applicable Fair Share contribution towards construction of Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure and any required CFD assessments at the entitlement application stage including St. Anton Partners and the Irvine Company pursuant to the DDAs for Disposition Parcels 1A-North and 2A, respectively. T/C-4 The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, Ongoing (see Project Public Works MCAS Tustin Specific Plan “Trips” are monitored by as applicable (for that portion of the Table 4.12-10 of developer Department Public Works Department on an ongoing basis as reuse plan area within Irvine), shall the Final EIS/EIR (Tustin or Irvine, projects are entitled. ensure that all on-site circulation system or Table 4-4 at the as applicable) improvements for the reuse plan area end of the  The District assumed in the 2005 and 2020 traffic Mitigation Final traffic study identified cumulative ADT: the analysis and as shown in Table 4-4 of the Monitoring and project ADT does not exceed thresholds identified revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see Reporting Program in the FEIS/EIR as modified by the a supplemental MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 82 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Table 4-4 at the end of the Mitigation for each specific Mitigation Agreement between the Cities of Irvine Monitoring and Reporting Program) are triggering and Tustin dated February 22, 2001 for off-site implemented according to the cumulative mechanism. mitigation at arterial intersections. ADT thresholds identified in the table. Under this Phasing Plan, the City of  Tustin Field I Tustin shall monitor all new development Project ADT determined consistent with ADT within the site, accounting for the threshold Table for compliance with Roadway cumulative ADT generated by Improvement Table. development projects. As each ADT threshold is reached, the roadway  Tustin Field II improvements listed in Table 4-4 of the Project ADT determined consistent with ADT revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see threshold Table for compliance with Roadway Table 4-4 at the end of the Mitigation Improvement Table. Required improvements Monitoring and Reporting Program) shall addressed with DDA, entitlement conditions and be constructed before any additional funding of CFD No. 04-01. projects within the reuse plan area would be approved.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Project ADT determined for project and ADT (As amended by Addendum) threshold reviewed for compliance with Roadway Improvement Table. Project ADT determined consistent with ADT threshold Table for compliance with Roadway Improvement Table. Required improvements addressed with DDA, entitlement conditions, and funding of CFD No. 06-01.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Project ADT determined for project and ADT threshold reviewed for compliance with Roadway Improvement Table. Project ADT determined consistent with ADT threshold Table for compliance with Roadway Improvement Table. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 83 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Required improvements addressed with DDA, entitlement conditions, and funding of CFD No. 06-01.  SOCCCD (ATEP) The trip counts for the ATEP are based on square feet. The project is within the Learning Village trip budget as allocated for Phase 1 of the project; however, all future phases will be monitored by the City pursuant to the Development Agreement and Amended and Restated (Conveyance) Agreement.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The trip counts for the Learning Village are based on square feet. The initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project, in addition to other approved projects within the Learning Village (ATEP), is within the EIS/EIR trip budget Any future phases will be evaluated at the application stage.  Master Development Footprint The Irvine Company and St. Anton Project ADT and ADT threshold were reviewed for compliance with Roadway Improvement Table. Project ADT determined consistent with ADT threshold Table for compliance with Roadway Improvement T/C-5 Prior to approval of a site development Ongoing, prior to Project Public Works/  The District permit or vesting tract, except for approval of a site developer Community Included in the DDA, Infrastructure and financing or conveyance purposes, for all development Development Construction Agreement (as amended), entitlement MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 84 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility land use designation areas in Alternative permit or vesting Departments conditions and CFD No. 07-01 Acquisition and 1 with the exception of the Learning tract, except for (Tustin and/or Construction Agreement. Village, Community Park, and Regional financing or Irvine, as Park, a project developer shall enter into conveyance applicable)  Tustin Field I an agreement with the City of Tustin and purposes, based on Included in the DDA, entitlement conditions and City of Irvine, as applicable (for that the ADT CFD No. 04-01 Acquisition and Construction portion of the reuse plan area within generation Agreement. Irvine) which assigns improvements thresholds shown required in the EIS/EIR to the in Tables 4.12-7,  Tustin Field II development site and which requires 4.12-8, 4.12-9, and Included in the DDA, entitlement conditions, and participation in a fair share mechanism to 4.12-10 of the design and construct required on-site and Final EIS/EIR (see CFD No. 04-01 Acquisition and Construction arterial improvements consistent with the Table4-4 at the end Agreement. ADT generation thresholds shown in of the Mitigation Table 4-4 of the revised Specific Plan Monitoring and  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Phasing Plan (see Tables 4-4 at the end Reporting Program Included in the Cooperative Agreement, of the Mitigation Monitoring and for each specific entitlement conditions, and CFD No. 06-01 Reporting Program). triggering Acquisition and Construction Agreement mechanism).  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) (As amended by Addendum) Included in the Cooperative Agreement, entitlement conditions, and CFD No. 06-01 Acquisition and Construction Agreement  SOCCCD (ATEP) Pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 85 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Tustin City Council policy exempts a public educational use from the Fair Share Contribution towards the Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program. The RSCCCD Regional Law Enforcement facility is a public use and is exempt. But would be responsible for any alteration of existing improvements in the public right-of-way necessary for their projects, subject to approval of the City.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to make the applicable Fair Share contribution towards construction of Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure and any improvements required to be constructed by developer, entitlement conditions at each application stage will reinforce these requirements pursuant to the Disposition Strategy. T/C-6 The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, Ongoing, based on Project Public Works and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan “Trips” are monitored by as applicable (for that portion of the the ADT developer Community Public Works Department on an ongoing basis as MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 86 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility reuse plan area in Irvine), will monitor generation Development projects are entitled. new development within the reuse plan thresholds shown Departments area, accounting for the cumulative in Table 4.12-10 of (Tustin and/or  The District ADTs generated by development projects the Final EIS/EIR Irvine, as Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; within the reuse plan area. As each (see Table 4-4 at applicable) City monitoring will determine timing of roadway cumulative ADT threshold shown in the end of the improvements identified in MMP Table 4-4; per Table 4-4 of the revised Specific Plan Mitigation project final traffic study, project does not exceed Phasing Plan 4.12-10 (see Table 4-4 at Monitoring and ADT threshold level requiring roadway the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program improvements shown in Table 4-4. Reporting Program) is reached, the for each specific roadway improvements listed shall be triggering constructed before any additional mechanism).  Tustin Field I projects within the reuse plan area are Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; approved. City monitoring will determine timing of roadway improvements identified in MMP Table 4-4; per (As amended by Addendum) project final traffic study, project does not exceed ADT threshold level requiring roadway improvements shown in Table 4-4.  Tustin Field II Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; City monitoring will determine timing of roadway improvements identified in MMP Table 4-4; per project final traffic study, project does not exceed ADT threshold level requiring roadway improvements shown in Table 4-4.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; City monitoring will determine timing of roadway improvements identified in MMP Table 4-4; per project final traffic study, project does not exceed MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 87 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility ADT threshold level requiring roadway improvements shown in Table 4-4.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Final traffic study identified cumulative ADTs; City monitoring will determine timing of roadway improvements identified in MMP Table 4-4; per project final traffic study, project does not exceed ADT threshold level requiring roadway improvements shown in Table 4-4.  SOCCCD (ATEP) As on-site development takes place, traffic studies to determine Average Daily Trip (ADT) levels will be required to ensure compliance with ADTs threshold.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The trip counts for the Learning Village are based on permitted total square footages and F.A.R for each use. The initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project, in addition to other approved projects within the Learning Village (ATEP), is within the EIS/EIR trip budget any future phases will be also evaluated against the Trip budget.  Master Development Footprint Traffic Studies, as necessary, will be required at the entitlement application stage for each neighborhood development. Cumulative ADTs will be identified and any required improvements necessary as a condition of occupancy will be MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 88 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility identified with entitlements. Conditions of entitlements and City monitoring will determine timing of roadway improvements. The Irvine Company and St. Anton project have been determined to be within the thresholds and appropriate backbone infrastructure improvements have been made as condition of approval of the projects. T/C-7 The City of Tustin shall adopt a trip Within one (1) City of Tustin Tustin Public A trip budget has been adopted for individual portions budget for individual portions of the year of project Works and of the reuse plan. “Trips” are monitored on reuse plan area to assist in the monitoring approval, and Community individual portions of the reuse plan are monitored by of cumulative ADTs and the amount and ongoing thereafter. Development Public Works Department on an ongoing basis as intensity of permitted non-residential Departments projects are entitled. uses as evaluated in the EIS/EIR. T/C-8 Alternative improvements that provide Ongoing City of Tustin Public Works and The City of Tustin and Irvine in 2001 entered into a an equivalent level of mitigation in 2005 and/or City of Community Mitigation Agreement that does identify alternative or 2020 to what is identified in Tables Irvine Development mitigation measures to those identified in the 4.12-7, 4.12-8, and 4.12-9 of the Final Departments FEIS/EIR. . Subsequently, the City of Irvine and the EIS/EIR (see Tables 2 through 4) at the (Tustin and/or City of Tustin entered into a Settlement Agreement end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Irvine, as and Mutual Release of Claims on July 13, 2010, for Reporting Program) may be identified in applicable) the IBC Vision Plan that further refined the mitigation consultation between the City of Tustin measures identified in the 2001 Settlement Mitigation and the City of Irvine, as applicable, and Agreement. the impacted jurisdiction. T/C-9 The City of Tustin shall enter into Within one (1) City of Tustin, Public Works and Mitigation Agreements with City of Santa Ana and agreements with Caltrans and the cities year of project City of Irvine Community City of Irvine executed in February 2001. of Santa Ana and Irvine to ensure that the approval. Development MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 89 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility off-site roadway improvements needed to Departments There are no impacts identified which require a mitigate the effects of the proposed (Tustin and/or Caltrans agreement. alternative are constructed pursuant to Irvine, as improvement programs established by applicable) the respective jurisdiction. In order to properly coordinate the timing and improvements in the adjacent jurisdictions, the City of Tustin shall hold a scoping-like meeting with the respective jurisdictions. The purpose of said scoping-like meeting shall be to identify the concerns of the respective jurisdictions prior to the initiation of the fair share study. The purpose of the study would be to fully identify, with each jurisdiction, the scope and costs of feasible improvements (as determined by the respective jurisdiction). The improvements would be acceptable to each jurisdiction toward fulfilling the timing and cost of the transportation improvement obligations as required to mitigate transportation impacts in each jurisdiction. The funding for the improvements to be incorporated into the agreement would be utilized by the respective agency to improve the capacity of the impacted intersec- tions/links or be used for substituted improvements, as determined by mutual agreement. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 90 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Prior to execution of the agreement, each jurisdiction would be allowed ten (10) working days to review the technical report prior to being provided with a copy of the proposed agreement. Each jurisdiction would then have ten (10) working days to review and comment as to its concurrence with the improvement programs contained in the agreement. The comments of each jurisdiction would be considered to ensure that the City of Tustin's responsibility for fair share funding of the improvements in each jurisdiction as stated above is fully addressed. TC-1 A westbound shared through/right-turn Opening Tustin City of Tustin Public Works  Master Development Footprint lane shall be added to the Redhill Ranch Road Department In the DDA, this was an improvement required to Avenue/Warner Avenue intersection Extension. be designed and constructed in conjunction with development of Neighborhood E by any subsequent (As amended by Final Supplement #1) developers. IA-1 Table 4.12-10 of the Final EIS/EIR, as See Table 4.12-10 City of Tustin Community MCAS Tustin Specific Plan “Trips” are monitored by revised and presented in Table 4-4 of the of the Final Development and Public Works Department on an ongoing basis as revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see EIS/EIR or Table Public Works projects are entitled. Table 4-4 at the end of the Mitigation 4-4 at the end of Departments Monitoring and Reporting Program) the Mitigation (Tustin and/or presents the Phasing Plan for the on-site Monitoring and Irvine, as circulation system. The Phasing Plan is Reporting Program applicable) based upon traffic circulation impact and for each specific mitigation analyses contained in the triggering MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 91 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Tustin Legacy Traffic Analysis (Austin-mechanism. Foust Associates, Inc., February 2006). Under this Specific Plan Phasing Plan, the City of Tustin shall monitor all new development within the Specific Plan, accounting for the cumulative ADT generated by development projects. As each ADT threshold is reached, the roadway improvements listed in Tables 4-3 and 4-4 of the revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see Tables 4-3 and 4-4 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) shall be constructed before any additional projects within the Specific Plan would be approved. (As amended by Addendum) IA-2 Table 7-3 of the Final EIS/EIR (see See Table 7-3 of City of Tustin Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan “Trips” are monitored by Table 3-3 at the end of the Mitigation the Final EIS/EIR Community Public Works Department and Community Monitoring and Reporting Program) or Table 6 at the Development and Development Department on an ongoing basis as presents the Trip Budget which end of the Mitigati-Public Works projects are entitled by neighborhood. summarizes the square footage of on Monitoring and Departments non-residential uses allocated to each Reporting Program neighborhood by Planning Area and the for each specific associated ADT. (Residential uses are triggering shown for information only, they are not mechanism. part of the budget.) Pursuant to Section 3.2.4 of the Specific Plan, the City of Tustin shall implement the trip budget by neighborhood to control the amount and intensity of non-residential uses. Trip MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 92 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Budget transfers between neighborhoods shall also be implemented as directed in subsection 3.2.4 of the Specific Plan. IA-3 Prior to the approval of (1) a Planning Prior to the Project Tustin  The District Area Concept Plan pursuant to Section approval of (1) a developer Community Traffic Analysis has been completed. The 4.2 of the Specific Plan, (2) a site Planning Area Development and majority of requirements have been constructed. development permit, or (3) a vesting Concept Plan Public Works Timing for the remaining Barranca Parkway tentative map for new square footage pursuant to Section Departments improvements are addressed in Amendment No. 5 (not for financing or conveyance 4.2 of the Specific of the DDA. purposes), a project developer shall Plan, (2) a site provide traffic information consistent development  Tustin Field I with the provisions of the Specific Plan, permit, or (3) a Traffic Analysis was prepared and all the FEIS/EIR, and this Addendum, and vesting tentative requirements installed. the requirements of the City of Tustin map for new squa- Traffic Engineer. The traffic information re footage (not for  Tustin Field II shall (a) identify and assign traffic financing or Traffic Analysis was prepared and all circulation mitigation measures required conveyance requirements installed. in the EIS/EIR pursuant to the Phasing purposes). Plan described in Table 4-4 of the revised  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see Table 4- Traffic Analysis was prepared and all 4 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring requirements installed. and Reporting Program); (b) evaluate the effects of either the delay of any  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) previously committed circulation Traffic Analysis was prepared and all improvements or the construction of requirements installed. currently unanticipated circulation improvements; and (c) utilize the  SOCCCD (ATEP) circulation system and capacity The trip counts for the ATEP are based on square assumptions within the EIS/EIR and any feet. The project is within the Learning Village trip additional circulation improvements budget as allocated for Phase 1 of the project; completed by affected jurisdictions for however, all future phases will be monitored by MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 93 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the applicable timeframe of analysis. the City pursuant to the Development Agreement and Amended and Restated (Conveyance) (As amended by Addendum) Agreement.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The initial Sheriff’s Training Facility project is complete. The project, combined with other ongoing projects, is within the trip budget as determined by the capacity assumptions of the EIR/EIS and any future phase will be evaluated when they are processed.  Master Development Footprint An updated Traffic Analysis may be required in conjunction with requests for entitlements for individual neighborhood phases by subsequent developers. IA-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits Prior to the Project Tustin  The District for new development within planning issuance of developer Community DDA and Infrastructure Construction and Payment areas requiring a concept plan, a project building permits. Development and Agreement, as amended, entered into which developer shall enter into an agreement Public Works identifies required design and construction with the City of Tustin to (a) design and Departments obligations as well as entitlement conditions, and construct roadway improvements documentation for CFD No. 07-01 Traffic analysis consistent with the ADT generation completed and required improvements are Phasing Plan described in Table 4-4 of currently under construction. the revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see Table 4-4 at the end of the  Tustin Field I Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting DDA entered into andImprovements included in Program) and (b) address the impact of entitlement conditions and CFD 04-01 and specify the responsibility for any documentation. previously committed circulation MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 94 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility improvements assumed in the EIS/EIR  Tustin Field II which have not been constructed. DDA entered into andImprovements included in entitlement conditions and CFD 04-01 (As amended by Addendum) documentation.  Columbus Grove Cooperative Agreement entered into, with Improvements included in entitlement conditions and CFD 06-01 documentation  Columbus Square Cooperative Agreement entered into with Improvements included in entitlement conditions and in CFD 06-01documentation.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement, SOCCCD is required to construct all on-site improvements; however, the City has exempted SOCCCD from City CFD funded Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure costs for the primary educational uses (Land Use Category 1) while it requires payment of its fair share of Backbone Infrastructure fees for non-educational uses (Land Use Category 2), and is still subject to assessments from outside utility purveyors regardless of the use of project and would be responsible for any costs that are necessary if SOCCCD proposes to modify or alter existing Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 95 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  RSCCD (Sheriff) An Agreement has been entered into. The initial facility is currently in compliance since it is an educational public use which is exempt under City Council policy from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program obligations.  Tustin Family Campus An Agreement has been entered into. Under City Council policy, public use is exempt from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program obligations.  Village of Hope An Agreement has been entered into. Under City Council policy, non-profit use is exempt from Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program obligations.  Master Development Footprint Traffic analysis completed and required contributions towards Tustin Legacy Backbone Infrastructure Program have been identified including developer required improvements to be completed. These will be imposed as necessary in any subsequent developer entitlements. The Irvine Company and St. Anton project have been conditioned appropriately for their fair share contribution to the Backbone Infrastructure Program. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 96 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility IA-5 If a subsequent traffic Phasing Plan Ongoing City of Tustin Tustin Public Not applicable at this time to any site at Tustin demonstrates that certain circulation Works and Legacy. improvements should be included in a Community different phase of Specific Plan Development development (accelerated or delayed) or Departments that a circulation improvement can be substituted, the mitigation Phasing Plan in Table 4-4 of the revised Specific Plan Phasing Plan (see Table 4-4 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) may be amended, subject to approval of the City of Tustin and any other affected jurisdictions, provided that the same level of traffic mitigation and traffic capacity would be provided. (As amended by Addendum) IA-6 The City of Tustin will enter into Within one (1) City of Tustin Tustin Public Studies have been completed and Mitigation agreements with Caltrans and the cities year of approval of Works and Agreements with City of Santa Ana and City of Irvine of Santa Ana and Irvine to ensure that the reuse and disposal Community have been executed. off-site roadway improvements needed to of MCAS Tustin Development mitigate the effects of the Specific Plan Departments There are no impacts identified which require a are constructed pursuant to improvement Caltrans agreement. programs established by the respective jurisdiction. In order to properly coordinate the timing and funding of fair share obligation of Specific Plan improvements in the adjacent jurisdictions, the City of Tustin shall hold a scoping-like meeting with MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 97 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the respective jurisdictions. The purpose of said scoping-like meeting shall be to identify the concerns of the respective jurisdictions prior to the initiation of the fair share study. The purpose of the study would be to fully identify, with each jurisdiction, the scope and costs of obligations of the Specific Plan as required to mitigate transportation impacts in feasible improvements (as determined by the respective jurisdiction). The improvements would be acceptable to each jurisdiction toward fulfilling the timing and cost of the transportation improvement each jurisdiction, as listed above. The funding for the improvements to be incorporated into the agreement would be utilized by the respective agency to improve the capacity of the impacted intersec- tions/links or be used for substituted improvements, as determined by mutual agreement. Prior to execution of the agreement, each jurisdiction would be allowed ten working days to review the technical report prior to being provided with a copy of the proposed agreement. Each jurisdiction would then have ten working days to review and comment as to its concurrence with the improvement MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 98 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility programs contained in the agreement. The comments of each jurisdiction would be considered to ensure that the City of Tustin's responsibility for fair share funding of the improvements in each jurisdiction as stated above is fully addressed. IA-7 Each Specific Plan project would Prior to issuance of Project Community At the entitlement stage, all development proposals at contain, to the satisfaction of the City of grading permits developer Development the concept plan and at design review and Tustin and/or City of Irvine, as Department construction stages have been required to include a applicable, a pedestrian circulation (Tustin and/or pedestrian circulation component. component showing pedestrian access to Irvine, as regional hiking trails, parks, schools, applicable) shopping areas, bus stops, and/or other public facilities. Mitigation Measures for Air Quality AQ-1 During construction of the proposed Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District project, the City, and/or developer and its grading or building developer Development Requirements are included in the construction contractors shall be required to comply permits. Department documents and enforced during construction with regional rules, which would assist in (Tustin and/or reducing short-term air pollutant Irvine, as  Tustin Field I emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 requires applicable) Requirements were enforced and construction is that air pollutant emissions should not completed create a nuisance off-site. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be  Tustin Field II controlled with the best available control Requirements were enforced and construction is measures so the presence of such dust completed does not remain visible in the atmosphere MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 99 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility beyond the property line of the emission  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) source. The City and its contractors shall Included with construction drawings and will be use the measures presented in SCAQMD enforced during construction. Rule 403 Tables 1, 2 and 3 (presented in Tables 5-1, 5-2 and 5-3 of the FEIS/EIR  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Addendum). This compliance measure Included with construction drawings and will be shall be included in the contractor’s enforced during construction specifications and verified on City projects by the Department of Public  SOCCCD (ATEP) Works. Requirements were fulfilled by the SOCCCD during construction for Phase 1; however, future (As amended by Addendum) phases will be subject to the AQMD rules which require air pollutant emissions to not create nuisance off-site.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Requirements were fulfilled by the RSCCD during construction.  Village of Hope Requirements were included in the construction documents and enforced during construction.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to provide requirements in the construction documents and to be enforced during construction, as applicable. The St. Anton and Irvine Company projects are currently under construction and all requirements will be enforced during construction. AQ-2 Unless determined by the City of Tustin Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 100 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility and the City of Irvine, as applicable, to grading or building developer Development Included with the construction drawings and will be infeasible on a project-by-project permits. Department be enforced during construction basis due to unique project (Tustin and/or characteristics, each city shall require Irvine, as  Tustin Field I individual development projects to use applicable) Requirements were enforced and construction is low VOC architectural coatings for all completed interior and exterior painting operations.  Tustin Field II Requirements were enforced and construction is completed  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Included with the construction drawings and will be enforced during construction.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Included with construction drawings and will be enforced during construction.  Tustin Family Campus Responsibility of County.  SOCCCD (ATEP) Responsibility of the SOCCCD but will be imposed in City conditions of approval on entitlements pursuant to the Development Agreement and Restated and Amended (Conveyance) Agreement.  RSCCD (Sheriff) Responsibility of the RSCCD MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 101 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility  Village of Hope Required as part of a condition of approval of the Design Review approved for the project.  Master Development Footprint Future developer(s) will be required to be conditioned at the entitlement application stage to comply with this requirement for each project, as applicable. AQ-3 Prior to the issuance of development Prior to issuance of Project Community permits for new non-residential projects development developer Development with 100 or more employees, and permits for new Department expanded projects where additional non-residential (Tustin and/or square footage would result in a total of projects with 100 Irvine, as 100 or more employees, the City of or more employees applicable) Tustin and the City of Irvine, as and expanded applicable, shall impose a mix of TDM projects where measures which, upon estimation, would additional square result in an average vehicle ridership of footage would at least 1.5, for each development with result in a total of characteristics that would be reasonably 100 or more conducive to successful implementation employees of such TDM measures. These TDM measures may include one or more of the following, as determined appropriate and feasible by each city on a case-by-case basis: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 102 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility - Establish preferential parking for Prior to issuance of Project Community  The District carpool vehicles. development developer Development The project’s approval includes the provisions of - Provide bicycle parking facilities. permits for new Department bicycle parking facilities and bus turn outs. - Provide shower and locker facilities. non-residential (Tustin and/or - Provide carpool and vanpool loading projects with 100 Irvine, as  Tustin Family Campus areas. or more employees applicable) The number of employees generated by the project - Incorporate bus stop improvements and expanded for on-site occupancy is anticipated to be less than into facility design. projects where 100 employees. - Implement shuttles to shopping, additional square eating, recreation, and/or parking and footage would  SOCCCD (ATEP) transit facilities. result in a total of The number of employees generated by the Phase I - Construct remote parking facilities. 100 or more project for on-site occupancy was anticipated to be - Provide pedestrian circulation employees less than 100 employees. Future phases of linkages. development may result in 100 or more employees - Construct pedestrian grade which would require compliance with the TDM separations. measures. - Establish carpool and vanpool programs.  RSCCD (Sheriff) - Provide cash allowances, passes, and The number of employees generated by the project other public transit and purchase for on-site occupancy is anticipated to be less than incentives. 100. - Establish parking fees for single occupancy vehicles.  Master Development Footprint - Provide parking subsidies for Non-residential developer(s) will be required to be rideshare vehicles. conditioned at the entitlement stage to comply with - Institute a computerized commuter applicable TDM measures for each project, as rideshare matching system. applicable. - Provide a guaranteed ride-home program for ridesharing. - Establish alternative work week, flex- time, and compressed work week schedules. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 103 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility - Establish telecommuting or work-at- home programs. Provide additional vacation and compensatory leave incentives. - Provide on-site lunch rooms/cafeterias and commercial service such as banks, restaurants, and small retail. - Provide on-site day care facilities. - Establish an employee transportation coordinator(s). AQ-4 If not required under each individual Ongoing Project Community Each non-residential project is required to submit a development's TDM plan, the City of developer Development TDM plan, as applicable, and the projects will be Tustin and the City of Irvine, as Department analyzed on a case by case basis and applicable applicable, shall implement the following (Tustin and/or measures would be implemented. measures, as determined appropriate or Irvine, as feasible by each city on a case-by-case applicable)  The District basis: The project’s approval includes the provisions of bicycle parking facilities and bus turn outs. - Reschedule truck deliveries and pickups for off-peak hours.  SOCCCD - Implement lunch shuttle service from The project’s approval includes the provisions of a worksite(s) to food establishments. bicycle parking facilities and bus turn outs. - Implement compressed work week  schedules where weekly work hours Tustin Family Campus are compressed into fewer than five Programs offered at the campus include on-site daycare, on-site residential programs for abused days, such as 9/80, 4/40, or 3/36. and neglected children and their families, and other - Provide on-site child care and transportation related services for the clients. after-school facilities or contribute to off-site developments within walking  RSCCD (Sheriff) distance. The project design includes the provisions of - Provide on-site employee services MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 104 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility such as cafeterias, banks, etc. bicycle parking facilities, on-site gymnasium, shower facilities, and on-site employee services. - Implement a pricing structure for single-occupancy employee parking,  Master Development Footprint and/or provide discounts to Developer(s) of non-residential projects will be ridesharers. required to be conditioned to comply with - Construct off-site pedestrian facility applicable TDM measures for each project, as improvements such as overpasses applicable. and wider sidewalks. - Include retail services within or adjacent to residential subdivisions. - Provide shuttles to major rail transit centers or multi-modal stations. - Contribute to regional transit systems (e.g., right-of-way, capital improvements, etc.). - Synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by development. - Construct, contribute, or dedicate land for the provision of off-site bicycle trails linking the facility to designated bicycle commuting routes. - Include residential units within a commercial development. - Provide off-site bicycle facility improvements, such as bicycle trails linking the facility to designated bicycle commuting routes, or on-site improvements, such as bicycle paths. - Include bicycle parking facilities such as bicycle lockers. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 105 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility - Include showers for bicycling and pedestrian employees' use. - Construct on-site pedestrian facility improvements, such as building access which is physically separated from street and parking lot traffic, and walk paths. AQ-1 During construction of the proposed During City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint roadway extension, the following construction of the Development Tustin Ranch Road from Warner Avenue to Walnut measures will be implemented to comply Tustin Ranch Road Department. Avenue was completed in 2013. The contractor is with existing SCAQMD Rules and Extension. required to follow SCAQMD rules and Regulations: regulations. - Rule 1113 that regulates the VOC content of any paints and surface coatings that may be used in construction, - Rule 1108 that regulates the VOC content of any asphalt used in construction, SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 that regulate the control of fugitive dust and visible emissions. - All stationary equipment (e.g., generators and compressors) .rated in excess of 50 horsepower is subject to SCAQMD permitting. (As amended by Final Supplement #1) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 106 2013 Annual Report MMRP  )ffireS( Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Mitigation Measures for Noise N-1 Prior to reuse of any existing residential Prior to reuse of Project Community No reuse of any existing residential is proposed. units within the reuse area for civilian any existing developer Development use, the City of Tustin or the City of residential units. Department Irvine, as applicable, and where (Tustin and/or necessary and feasible, shall require the Irvine, as installation of noise attenuation barriers, applicable) insulation, or similar devices to ensure that interior and exterior noise levels at these residential units do not exceed applicable noise standards. N-2 During design of the grade-separated Prior to approval Project Tustin Public Noise studies were completed. Mitigation has been intersection of Tustin Ranch Road at of final design developer Works identified and implemented. Edinger Avenue, the City of Tustin shall plans. Department evaluate potential noise impacts on surrounding properties to the northeast of Edinger Avenue and shall incorporate into the design of this intersection noise attenuation measures determined appropriate and feasible by the City of Tustin, in order to ensure that these surrounding properties do not experience noise levels that exceed City of Tustin noise standards. N-3 For new development within the reuse Prior to issuance of Project Community  Tustin Field I area, the City of Tustin and City of building permits. developer Development Noise analysis was prepared for all sensitive noise Irvine, as applicable, shall ensure that Department receptors and recommended mitigation such as interior and exterior noise levels do not (Tustin and/or MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 107 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility exceed those prescribed by state Irvine, as sound walls and window/door upgrades were requirements and local city ordinances applicable) included in the construction drawings. and general plans. Plans demonstrating noise regulation conformity shall be  Tustin Field II submitted for review and approval prior Noise analysis was prepared for all sensitive noise to building permits being issued to receptors and recommended mitigation such as accommodate reuse. sound walls and window/door upgrades were included in the construction drawings.  Columbus Grove (Tract 16582) Noise analysis was prepared for all sensitive noise receptors and recommended mitigation such as sound walls and window/door upgrades were included in the construction drawings.  Columbus Square (Tract 16581) Noise analyses were prepared for all sensitive noise receptors and recommended mitigation such as sound walls, window/door upgrades were included in construction drawings  SOCCCD (ATEP) Phase 1 of the project is complete. The project was required to comply with the City’s noise standards, and will be required for all future phases.  RSCCD (Sheriff) The Sheriff’s Training Facility project is complete. The project was required to comply with the City’s noise standards. The State Division of Architect is responsible for ensuring compliance with City’s MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 108 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility noise standards, and will be required for all future phases.  Village of Hope Noise analyses were prepared for all sensitive noise receptors and recommended mitigation such as sound walls, windows, door upgrades were included in construction drawings.  Master Development Footprint Prior to issuance of any building permits, developers of future construction projects may be required submit an acoustical study for review and approval and conditions will be placed on development based on the studies. The Irvine Company and St. Anton projects submitted their noise reports and recommended mitigation will be implemented accordingly. N-4 Prior to the connection of Warner Prior to approval City of Tustin Tustin To be implemented at the time closer to the time Avenue to the North Loop Road or the of final design and City of Community frame for completion of the future segment of Warner South Loop Road, the City of Tustin plans. Irvine Development and Avenue that will extend from Harvard Avenue to Red shall conduct an acoustical study to Public Works Hill Avenue. assess reuse traffic noise impacts to Departments existing sensitive receptors adjacent to Warner Avenue, between Harvard Avenue and Culver Drive. If mitigation of reuse traffic noise impacts is required, the City of Tustin and the City of Irvine shall enter into an agreement that defines required mitigation and which allocates MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 109 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the cost of mitigation between the City of Tustin and the City of Irvine on a fair share basis. NR-1 Prior to opening the proposed segment of Prior to opening City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint Tustin Ranch Road to traffic, the City the proposed Development and Tustin Ranch Road construction and any required will install a soundwall that achieves the segment of Tustin Public Works noise mitigation measures are completed. exterior (i.e., 65 dBA) residential noise Ranch Road to Departments standards identified in the City of Tustin traffic Noise Element. The following are the required heights of the soundwall in relation to the elevation of the proposed roadway adjacent to the residential receptors (see Exhibit 5.3-2 in Final Supplement to FEIR for receptor locations).  Receptor 1 Existing 6-foot wall  Receptors 2- 4 Proposed 12-foot wall  Receptors 5-6 Proposed 10-foot wall  Receptors 7-8 Proposed 8-foot wall  Receptors 9 through 15feet south of Receptor 21 Proposed 6-foot wall (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-2 Receptors 1 through 13 requires forced Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint air ventilation (see Exhibit 5.3-2 in Final opening of the Development Tustin Ranch Road construction is complete and Supplement to FEIR for receptor proposed segment Department all requirements have been addressed including locations). If Receptors 1 through 13 do of Tustin Ranch any agreements with impacted property owners. not currently have forced air ventilation, Road to traffic MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 110 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the City shall provide forced air ventilation prior to the opening of the proposed segment of Tustin Ranch Road to traffic. (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-3 Receptors 14 through 21 that have a Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint second story will require forced air opening of the Development Tustin Ranch Road construction is complete and ventilation in the second story. If these proposed segment Department all requirements have been addressed including residential receptors do not currently of Tustin Ranch any agreements with impacted property owners. have forced air ventilation, the City shall Road to traffic provide forced air ventilation in the second story prior to the opening of the proposed segment of Tustin Ranch Road to traffic. (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-4 Prior to the opening of the proposed Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint segment of Tustin Ranch Road to traffic, opening of the Development Tustin Ranch Road construction is and all all second-story windows and/or sliding proposed segment Department requirements have been addressed including any glass doors in habitable rooms of the of Tustin Ranch agreements with impacted property owners. residences along the proposed alignment Road to traffic that view the proposed alignment shall be fitted with acoustic-rated window/door assemblies. These assemblies shall have a sound transmission class (STC) rating of no less than 35 and the STC shall be high enough to achieve an interior noise level of no more than 45 dBA CNEL. Non-sensitive uses (e.g., bathrooms) do not require such assemblies. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 111 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-5 All second-story exterior doors in Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint habitable rooms of the residences along opening of the Development Tustin Ranch Road construction is and all the proposed alignment that view the proposed segment Department requirements have been addressed including any proposed alignment shall be fitted with of Tustin Ranch agreements with impacted property owners. solid-core assemblies that are well sealed Road to traffic with weather-stripping. (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-6 Prior to opening of the proposed segment Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint of Tustin Ranch Road to traffic, the City opening of the Development and Tustin Ranch Road construction is and all will install a 10-foot high wall along the proposed segment Public Works requirements have been addressed including any eastern easement of Tustin Ranch Road of Tustin Ranch Departments agreements with impacted property owners. from Walnut Avenue to the southern Road to traffic . property line of the First Baptist Church (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-7 The second-story windows that view the Prior to the City of Tustin Community  Master Development Footprint proposed alignment shall be fitted with opening of the Development Tustin Ranch Road construction is and all acoustic-rated window assemblies. The proposed segment Department requirements have been addressed including any assemblies shall have a sound of Tustin Ranch agreements with impacted property owners. transmission class (STC) rating of no less Road to traffic than 35 and the STC shall be high enough to achieve an interior noise of no more than 45 dBA CNEL. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 112 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (As amended by Final Supplement #1) NR-8 The construction contractor shall notify Prior to approval City of Tustin Public Works  Master Development Footprint all property owners and tenants adjacent of Plans and Department Tustin Ranch Road construction is complete. All to the proposed construction activities of Specifications requirements including notifications have been the days and hours of operation. Prior to completed. construction activities, the construction contractor shall inspect all structures on adjacent properties to document existing characteristics of the structures. If damages to structures (i.e., residences, pools, decking) occur during construction activities, the property owner shall be financially compensated by the construction contractor to remediate damages. These provisions shall be placed on all construction contract documents. (As amended by Final Supplement #1) Implementation Measures for Water Quality WQ-1 Prior to the approval of grading plans, Prior to approval Project Community Notice of Intent is on file with Community the project developers shall provide of grading plans. Developer Development Development Department and/or Public Works written evidence to the Department of Department Department. Public Works that it has filed a Notice of (Tustin and/or Intent with the State Water Resources Irvine, as Control Board in order to obtain applicable) coverage under the latest approved General Construction Permit. Pursuant to the permit requirements, developers shall MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 113 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that incorporates Best Management Practices for reducing or eliminating sediment and other construction-related pollutants in the site runoff. (As amended by Addendum) WQ-2 Prior to approval of a grading plans, the Prior to approval Project Community Projects were reviewed for compliance with the Department of Public Works shall of grading plans. Developer Development General Waste Discharge Requirements. confirm that the contractors Department specifications require compliance with (Tustin and/or the latest approved General Waste Irvine, as Discharge Requirements issued by the applicable) Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board to govern discharges from construction dewatering and water line/sprinkler line testing should they occur during construction. Developers shall comply with these regulations including provisions requiring notification, testing and reporting of dewatering and testing-related discharges, which shall mitigate any impacts of such discharges. (As amended by Addendum) WQ-3 The City of Tustin and major master plan Ongoing Project Community The City participates in the Regional Board’s NSMP developers of the former MCAS Tustin Developer Development Working Group. shall participate in the Regional Board’s Department MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 114 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility NSMP Working Group and contribute to (Tustin and/or funding and implementation of the Work Irvine, as Plan. To mitigate construction-related applicable) selenium and nutrient water quality impacts that may result from construction-related groundwater discharges, developers shall implement: (a) feasible and available volume reduction BMPs in accordance with the General NSMP Permit (R8-2004-0021); (b) selenium and nutrient control BMPs that are developed under the Work Plan as of the date of project approval; and (c) selenium and nutrient measures that may be developed under the Work Plan after project approval which are available and feasible to deploy. (As amended by Addendum) WQ-4 To mitigate post-construction surface Prior to issuance of Project Community Prior to issuance of grading permits, each water and long-term groundwater grading permits. Developer Development development is required to submit a Water Quality discharge water quality impacts, prior to Department Management Plan which identifies applicable best issuance of grading permits, developers (Tustin and/or practices, as applicable. shall prepare a project WQMP, which Irvine, as shall be submitted to the City of Tustin applicable) or City of Irvine, as applicable, for approval. The WQMP shall be prepared in compliance with all MS4 Permit requirements (including DAMP and LIP requirements), and at a minimum shall contain the following elements: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 115 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility a) An Integrated Water Conservation/Storm Water Runoff and Subdrain Discharge Water Quality Management Program. This program shall integrate into the storm drainage and water quality control system facilities and systems to capture, recycle and conserve low flows, which may include irrigation returns and subdrain discharges, to reduce, to the extent feasible, post- development low flow surface runoff and groundwater discharge volumes. The program shall also implement one or more treatment control technologies developed under the NSMP and available at the time of project approval for nutrient and selenium removal. b) Site Planning and Design BMPs. The WQMP shall incorporate site design BMPs described in the Model WQMP attached as Exhibit 7.11 to the DAMP to the extent feasible and appropriate in light of proposed land uses. c) Source Control BMPs. The WQMP shall incorporate source control BMPs described in the Model WQMP attached as Exhibit MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 116 2013 Annual Report MMRP Measure Timing and Mitigation Mitigation Status Implementation Compliance Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility 7.11 to the DAMP to the extent feasible and appropriate in light of proposed land use. d) Treatment Control BMPs. The WQMP shall incorporate treatment control BMPs described in the Model WQMP attached as Exhibit 7.11 to the DAMP. (As amended by Addendum) WQ-5 As required by DAMP and the MS4 Prior to issuance of Project Community Prior to issuance of grading permits, each Permit, as well as the Cooperative grading permits. Developer Development development is required to submit a Water Quality Agreement DO2-119 between the City of Department Management Plan which identifies applicable best Tustin, OCFCD, and the County of (Tustin and/or practices, as applicable. Orange, a Water Quality Technical Irvine, as Report (WQTR) shall be prepared prior applicable) to the issuance of grading permits. The WQTR shall quantitatively and qualitatively (as appropriate) assess planned BMPs to be included in the WQMP to confirm that the treatment and hydrologic controls included in the SWPPP and WQMP will be sufficient to assure that project discharges will not cause a violation of applicable water quality standards. (As amended by Addendum) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 117 2013 Annual Report MMRP REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 3-3 1 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET Residential/Parks Non-Residential Planning Land Use Category Units Area Amount ADT Amount ADT NEIGHBORHOOD A Elementary/Middle School STU 550 561 Learning Center TSF 1,293.86 7,920 1 Neighborhood Commercial TSF 27.12 3,033 Tustin Facility SG 6,220 PA 1 Trip Budget Total 1,320.98 17,734 2 Sports Park ACRE 24.10 1,297 3 Transitional Housing ROOM 192 941 Neighborhood A Square Footage Total TSF 1,320.98 Neighborhood A Trip Budget Total 17,734 NEIGHBORHOOD B LDR (1-7 DU/Acre) DU 145 1,388 4 MDR (8-15 DU/Acre) DU 120 960 Senior Housing Attached DU 72 250 MDR (8-15 DU/Acre) DU 132 1,056 5 MHDR (16-25 DU/Acre) DU 438 2,903 Senior Housing Attached DU 170 590 Community Commercial TSF 103.46 7,052 7 General Office TSF 144.84 1,922 PA 7 Trip Budget Total 248.30 8,974 Neighborhood B Square Footage Total TSF 248.30 Neighborhood B Trip Budget Total 8,974 NEIGHBORHOOD C Community Commercial TSF 57.50 3,920 6 Regional Park ACRE 84.50 423 PA 6 Trip Budget Total 3,920 Neighborhood C Square Footage Total TSF 57.50 Neighborhood C Trip Budget Total 3,920 NEIGHBORHOOD D High School STU 1,850 3,312 Neighborhood Commercial TSF 65.69 7,345 General Office TSF 207 2,747 Office Park TSF 1,383.80 11,280 8 Industrial Park TSF 319.51 3,803 Park ACRE 10.30 52 Sports Park ACRE 46 2,475 PA 8 Trip Budget Total 1,976 28,487 EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 118 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 3-3 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET (Continued) Residential/Parks Non-Residential Planning Land Use Category Units Area Amount ADT Amount ADT MHDR (16-25 DU/Acre) DU 891 5,907 Hotel (380 TSF) ROOM 500 4,115 Neighborhood Commercial TSF 9.76 1,091 Community Commercial TSF 117.10 7,984 13 General Office TSF 1,512 20,065 Park ACRE 12.90 65 Health Club TSF 30 988 High-Turnover Restaurant TSF 12 1,526 PA 13 Trip Budget Total 2,060.86 35,769 Community Commercial TSF 11.11 757 General Office TSF 136.90 1,818 Office Park TSF 547 5,645 14 Theatre (25 TSF) SEAT 1,000 1,250 High-Turnover Restaurant TSF 6 763 PA 14 Trip Budget Total 726.01 10,233 Neighborhood D Square Footage Total TSF 4,762.87 Neighborhood D Trip Budget Total 74,489 NEIGHBORHOOD E Industrial Park TSF 44.61 714 Park ACRE 1.10 6 9 Sports Park ACRE 6.10 328 PA 9 Trip Budget Total 44.61 714 General Office TSF 156.82 2,081 Industrial Park TSF 124.41 1,569 10 Park ACRE 1.40 7 Sports Park ACRE 4.30 231 PA 10 Trip Budget Total 281.23 3,650 Neighborhood Commercial TSF 18.13 2,028 General Office TSF 371.89 4,935 Office Park TSF 278.78 2,663 11 Industrial Park TSF 138.52 2,002 Park ACRE 25.70 130 PA 11 Trip Budget Total 807.32 11,628 Office Park TSF 134.17 1,281 12 PA 12 Trip Budget Total 134.17 1,281 Neighborhood E Square Footage Total TSF 1,267.33 Neighborhood E Trip Budget Total 17,273 EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 119 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED SPECIFIC PLAN TABLE 3-3 PLANNING AREA TRIP BUDGET (Continued) Residential/Parks Non-Residential Planning Land Use Category Units Area Amount ADT Amount ADT NEIGHBORHOOD F Shopping Center TSF 448 13,772 16 PA 16 Trip Budget Total 448 13,772 Shopping Center TSF 47 1,445 17 PA 17 Trip Budget Total 47 1,445 Military (Office) TSF 40.85 542 18 PA 18 Trip Budget Total 40.85 542 Shopping Center TSF 435.60 13,391 435.60 13,391 19 Multiplex Theater (70 TSF) SEAT 3,500 6,300 PA 19 Trip Budget Total TSF 505.60 19,691 Neighborhood F Square Footage Total TSF 1,041.45 Neighborhood F Trip Budget Total 35,450 NEIGHBORHOOD G LDR (1-7 DU/Acre) DU 533 5,102 MDR (8-15 DU/Acre) DU 489 3,912 MHDR (16-25 DU/Acre) DU 192 1,273 Elementary/Middle School STU 1,200 1,224 Neighborhood Commercial TSF 26.68 2,983 15 Community Commercial TSF 130.68 8,908 General Office TSF 150.28 1,994 Park ACRE 49 249 Senior Congregate TSF 158.99 970 Sports Park ACRE 14.10 758 PA 15 Trip Budget Total 466.63 14,855 20 MHDR (16-25 DU/Acre) DU 376 2,493 LDR (1-7 DU/Acre) DU 189 1,809 21 MDR (8-15 DU/Acre) DU 465 3,720 Neighborhood G Square Footage Total TSF 466.63 Neighborhood G Trip Budget Total 14,855 NEIGHBORHOOD H LDR (1-7 DU/Acre) DU 166 1,589 22 MDR (8-15 DU/Acre) DU 243 1,944 Elementary/Middle School STU 650 663 Neighborhood H Square Footage Total TSF 0 Neighborhood H Trip Budget Total 0 1 Residential and park uses are shown for informational purposes only and are not part of the non-residential trip budget. EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 120 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED TABLE 4-2 PHASING PLAN REQUIREMENTS Facility General Scope General Triggering Mechanism Circulation 1) On-site arterial highways, intersections and When cumulative development and associated Tustin Ranch Road/Edinger Avenue average daily trips reach ADT development interchange; thresholds based on the land use/trip budget 2) Off-site arterial highway, intersection presented in the FEIS/EIR or as modified by the improvements; FEIS/EIR Addendum or any subsequent amendment. 3) Selected advanced transportation management system (ATMs) facilities. Bikeways/Trails 1) Class 1 Bikeway along Peters Canyon 1) When Peters Canyon Channel is improved. Channel; 2) When backbone arterial highways are 2) On-site Class II Bikeway System. constructed. Domestic 1) Existing housing water distribution lines; 1) Upon determination by IRWD regarding (Potable) Water 2) New backbone water mains; acceptability of the lines. 3) Abandoned/relocated wells 2) When backbone arterial highways are constructed; 3) Upon determination by the City and consultation with IRWD. Reclaimed 1) New backbone water lines; 1) When backbone arterials highways are (Non-Potable) 2) Existing and new well sites. constructed; Water 2) Upon completion of negotiations by City IRWD or developer(s) regarding exchange of well sites. Sanitary Sewer 1) Existing housing sewer conveyance lines; 1) Upon determination by the IRWD regarding 2) New backbone sewer mains. acceptability of the lines; 2) When backbone arterial highways are constructed. Storm Drain 1) Backbone storm drain systems; 1) Generally in conjunction with arterial highway 2) Regional flood control channel construction. Armstrong/Barranca channel improvements; improvements upon determination of 3) Retention basins; acceptability as part of development plans. 4) Flood plain mitigation. 2) Any project generated Barranca Channel improvements in conjunction with development as needed or determined by the applicable jurisdiction and in consultation with the OCFCD; any necessary project generated Peters Canyon Channel and Santa Ana/Santa Fe channel improvements in conjunction with development as needed or determined by the applicable jurisdiction and in consultation with the OCFCD. 3) As necessary as interim or permanent design in review of development plans. 4) Filing of flood zone map with FEMA prior to any construction. Electricity Backbone electric distribution lines. When backbone arterial highways are constructed. Natural Gas Backbone gas distribution lines. When backbone arterial highways are constructed. Telephone Backbone telephone lines. When backbone arterial highways are constructed. Cable Television Backbone cable television distribution lines; fiber When backbone arterial highways are constructed. optic cables. EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 121 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED TABLE 4-2 PHASING PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Continued) Facility General Scope General Triggering Mechanism Parks 1) Regional park; 1) Site can be used upon transfer to County; 2) Community park (24 acre); improvements will occur per agreement with 3) Community park (46 acres), neighborhood City of Tustin; parks and private parks; 2) Site can be used upon transfer to City; 4) Neighborhood park in Irvine. upgrading will occur upon receipt of adequate funding including park development fees; 3) When adequate park development fees are received, subject to development conditions, development agreements and funding availability as applicable; 4) When adequate funding has been secured from assessment district funding; tax-increment or developer-negotiation. Note: In addition to applicable sections of this Phasing Plan, the provisions of the joint Final EIS/EIR will apply. EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 122 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED TABLE 4-3 ON-SITE ARTERIAL CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS Limits Road From To Classification Barranca Parkway Red Hill Avenue Jamboree Road Major Arterial Edinger Avenue East of Red Hill Avenue West of Jamboree Road Major Arterial Red Hill Avenue Barranca Parkway North of Valencia Avenue Major Arterial Tustin Ranch Road Edinger Avenue Barranca Parkway Major Arterial (including interchange) Tustin Ranch Road Warner Avenue Red Hill Avenue Major Arterial (formerly North Loop Road) Harvard Avenue Barranca Parkway Edinger Avenue Primary Arterial Tustin Ranch Road (formerly Warner Avenue Jamboree Road Primary Arterial North Loop Road) A Street 1 South Loop Road Tustin Ranch Road Secondary Arterial Valencia Avenue (formerly Armstrong Avenue Barranca Parkway Secondary Arterial North Loop Road) Carnegie Avenue 1 Red Hill Avenue Armstrong Avenue Secondary Arterial East Connector Edinger Avenue North Loop Road Secondary Arterial South of OCTA/SCRRA Harvard Avenue Edinger Avenue Secondary Arterial Railroad Victory Road 1 (formerly Park Avenue (formerly Warner Avenue Secondary Arterial Legacy Road) North Loop Road) Park Avenue 1 (formerly Valencia Avenue Warner Avenue Secondary Arterial North Loop Road) Legacy Road 1 (formerly Warner Avenue (formerly Tustin Ranch Road Secondary Arterial Park Avenue) South Loop Road) Park Avenue (formerly Tustin Ranch Road Warner Avenue Secondary Arterial South Loop Road) Tustin Ranch Road (formerly 1 South Loop Road Armstrong Avenue Secondary Arterial Park Avenue) Kensington Park Drive Valencia Avenue (formerly Edinger Avenue Secondary Arterial (formerly West Connector) North Loop Road) Aston Street 1 Carnegie Avenue Barranca Parkway Local Collector Street Park Avenue (formerly North Moffett Drive Harvard Avenue Local Collector Street Loop Road)  Sweet Shade Harvard Avenue Local Collector Street  Lansdowne Road North Loop Road Local Street  Severyns Road North Loop Road Local Street 1 New Improvement EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 123 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program REVISED TABLE 4-4 ON-SITE ADT DEVELOPMENT THRESHOLDS TABLE 4-4 ON-SITE ADT DEVELOPMENT THRESHOLDS ADT Added (Cumulative) Roads Added 1 Armstrong Avenue – North Loop Road to Warner Avenue 2 Barranca Parkway –Tustin Ranch Road to Jamboree Road Edinger Avenue – along project frontage between Red Hill Avenue and Jamboree Road (completed) Harvard Avenue – Barranca Parkway to just south of OCTA/SCRRA railroad 27,000 (27,000) Lansdowne Road Marble Mountain Road (completed as “Sweet Shade”)2 North Loop Road – Red Hill Avenue to West Connector Severyns Road 2 West Connector East Connector Barranca Parkway – Tustin Ranch Road to Red Hill Avenue Moffett Drive North Loop Road – West Connector to Moffett Drive Red Hill Avenue/Carnegie Avenue Intersection (East Leg to Linear 82,800 (109,800) Park) Red Hill Avenue – Barranca Parkway to just north of Valencia Avenue South Loop Road – Warner Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road 2 Tustin Ranch Road – Walnut Avenue to Barranca Parkway 2 Warner Avenue – Red Hill Avenue to Jamboree Road 2 A Street – South Loop Road to Tustin Ranch Road 2 Armstrong Avenue – Warner Avenue to Barranca Parkway Carnegie Avenue – Linear Park to Armstrong Avenue becoming South 2 Loop Road 26,900 (136,700) Legacy Road – North Loop Road to Tustin Ranch Road 2 North Loop Road – Moffett Drive to Warner Avenue Park Avenue – South Loop Road to Tustin Ranch Road 2 South Loop Road – Armstrong Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road via Park 2 Avenue 39,500 (176,200) Legacy Road – Warner Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road 2 40,200 (216,400) Aston Street – Carnegie Avenue to Barranca Parkway 2 1 Roadway shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for this phase. 2 Changes to original FEIS/EIR. EIS/EIR for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin 124 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MCAS Tustin Planning Area Trip Budget Planned (Table 3 -3) Built/Approved Balance Remaining Average aily Trips Average Daily Trips Average Dail y Trips Planning Area Non -Res Amount Trip Bud Non -Res Non -Res Amount Trip Bud Non -Res Non -Res Amount Trip Budget Non -Res Neighborhood A 2,229,579 23,974 128,480 1,347 2,101,099 22,628 Neighborhood B 248,300 8,974 248,300 8,974 Neighborhood C 57,500 3,920 57,500 3,920 Neighborhood D 4,762,870 74,489 4,762,870 74,489 Neighborhood E 1,267,330 17,832 1,267,330 17,832 Neighborhood F 1,041,450 35,450 1,031,264 34,299 10,186 1,151 Neighborhood G 466,630 14,855 466,630 14,855 Neighborhood H 0 0 0 0 Total 10,073,660 179,494 1,159,744 35,647 8.913.915 143,848