The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03 ZONE CHANGE 97-002 11-03-97 ~ NO. 3 · ' ; ~ -- 11-3- Intor-Com DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1997 97 TO' WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 97-002 AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 ~laza! Cbhter, i. 'lo~at~d o~iithe nb~hWest~m ~omer Edih~er~ A:~en'ae:':~ ::~ rent~ve ~ parcel MaP (TPM):.::' 97~164.. is.. a. ~6~b~h Ofthe:'ce~t~;ihtO ;20 numbered p~Cels and: aPP~°~im~ely:. 122;:000 sqdare'-feet of %¢..'offiCe,:.:: ~e~i~ ~:.;~l°P~:nt~: .? on; O~tOb. e~:~ 27, 1997,.-th.e:':'p~nning :. ~OU~'Ca~:appr°~e :'2C 9?:O02 :"ana':ml:: the D~i~n.~:Re~iO¢ fO~:::th:e:prOject:.: .' .~:. :~- '".' RECOMMENDATION That the City Council' 1. Conduct a public hearing; . Adopt Resolution No. 97-108 certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate for this project; o Introduce and have the first reading of Ordinance No. 1191 approving Zone Change 97- 002 and set for second reading at the Council's November 17, 1997 meeting; and 4.. Adopt Resolution No. 97-109 approving Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 97-164. City Council Report ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT. ' The applicant has paid application fees to recover the cost of processing this application. REOUESTS 1. ZONE CHANGE 97-002- A request to: A. Amend the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations to modify the Planning Area boundaries for the undeveloped portion of the Jamboree Plaza Center at the northwestern corner of Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue; and, g. Amend the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations text to modify the Statistical Summary/Land Use Designations to reflect the above noted changes and provide consistency between the Planning Areas and the text of the District Regulations.' e VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 - A request to subdivide the undeveloped portion of the Jamboree Plaza center (not including the future service station, carwash, or the commuter-rail station site) into 20 numbered lots and 3 lettered parcels to accommodate approximately 122,000 square feet of new retail, commercial and industrial/business park development. INTRODUCTION In June 1991, the Planning Commission and City Council approved the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations for the property located at~ the northwest corner of Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue. These regulations, which divide the project site into four "Planning Areas" to separate the different land uses, are intended to provide for a cohesive, mixed-use center of retail, auto service, office and ~ight industrial uses with a maximum floor area of approximately 230,000 square feet. To date, a total of 26,110 square feet ha.s been developed, including a 3,000 square foot fast food restaurant in Planning Area A (Free-standing commercial) and 23,110 square feet City Council Report ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 3 of auto service uses in Planning Area C (Auto Services). Plans for the anticipated service station in Planning Area A at the center entrance were recently approved. No development has occurred within Planning Area B (Retail/Commercial) or Planning Area D (Industrial/Office). The applicant proposes to subdivide and develop the ~:emaining 8.2 acres of the Jamboree Plaza center consistent with the allowed' uses identified in the District Regulations, which would include retail, commercial, office and industrial uses. Surrounding Uses Surrounding uses include the MCAS-Tustin helicopter station to the south and west, the Irvine Industrial Complex-Tustin' to the north across the AT & SF and OCTA railroads, and vacant land to the east across jamboree Road, zoned Public & Institutional (P&I). DISCUSSION The following discussion includes analyses of: the proposed zone change/modifications to the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations; the site plan and tentative map; access, parking and circulation; architecture; landscaping; and environmental impacts. Zone Change Approval of Zone Change 97-002 would amend the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations to reflect changes in the physical configuration of the subject site. The District Regulations currently divide the site into four distinct "Planning Areas", allowing for individual pad development along Edinger Avenue, strip retail uses, auto service uses, .and office/industrial uses. Recently, 3.67 acres of land desi~m~ated for office and industrial uses were subdivided from the Jamboree Plaza Center and sold to develop a commuter rail station. The primary difference between the existing and the proposed District Regulations will be a reconfiguration of the Planning Area boundaries to reflect the changes in the project site. The amount of land devoted to each use and the total amount of square footage has changed. The changes maximize the use of the available .land area while maintaining adequate parking for all proposed uses. The amount of building space devoted to the different Planning Areas is noted in the following Table. No City Council Report ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 4 changes to the other aspects of the Planning Areas, such as allowed/prohibited uses and building site development standards, are proposed. Section 2.0 of the District Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows with new text shaded and deleted text struck. There are four (4) separate land use categories provided within' the Jamboree Plaza Planned Community. Land Use designations are shown on Exhibit 1 with a statistical summary of each planning area as follows' PLANNING AREA TOTAL AUTHORIZED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE A 1..,~ n 20,000 C 2.0 23,200 The existing version of Exhibit 1 delineating the Planning Area boundaries is proposed to be replaced with Exhibit 1 as shown in City Council Ordinance No. 1191. Project Description, Site Plan and Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Parcel Map 97-164 would subdivide the balance of the Jamboree Plaza site (approximately 8.2 acres) into twenty numbered parcels and three lettered parcels. Parcels A and C are to be reserved for reciprocal parking and internal ingress/egress. Parcel B is intended to be an ingress/egress parcel for the-proposed commuter rail station adjacent to the northeastern City Council Report. ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 5 edge of the project site. The numbered parcels are Proposed to accommodate the footprints of the buildings. The site is proposed to be divided into two development phases. A copy of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556 has been included as Attachment D. The land use divisions are as follows: PLANNING AREA PARCELS/LOCATION/USES A Jack-in-the-Box, Car Wash Site, Service Station Site (pan of TPM 90-292/293) B Parcels 9, 10 (Buildings A, B in Site 1) C All developed buildings not in Planning Area A (part of TPM 90- 292/293) D Parcels 2-6, 8, 12-15, 19, 20 (Buildings D, E, E-i, F, G, L, K in Site 1 and Buildings B, C, D, E, F, H in Site 2) B/C Parcel 16 (Building H in Site 1) B/D Parcels 1,' 7, 11 (Buildings C, C-1 in Site 1 and Buildings A, G in Site 2) C/D Parcels 17, 18 (Buildings I, J in Site 1) Buildings located on Parcels 1, 3, 7, 8 and 13-15 are proposed to have mezzanine space devoted to office uses. Access, Circulation and Parking 'Access to the site is proposed via three driveways from Edinger Avenue, two of which are "right-in/right-out"'and the middle driveway is a signalized three-phase intersection. The eastern most driveway, constructed as part of the original Jamboree Plaza development, has a right-of- way width of thirty feet and is situated six hundred feet west of the centerline of Jamboree Road. Acceleration and deceleration lanes are also incorporated into the design of this access point. The signalized intersection has a right-of-way of seventy-four feet and is situated approximately five hundred fifty feet west of the eastern most driveway. The western 'most driveway has a right-of-way of twenty-seven and-a-half feet and is nine hUndred feet west of the si~alized intersection. City Council Report ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 6 All internal access roads are private streets with a minimum drive aisle width of twenty-five feet. Sidewalk areas and walkways are also provided throughout the entire project site in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. For Planning Areas A, C and D, parking ratios are calculated at three spaces for every thousand square feet of gross floor area. Parking ratiOs for Planning Area B, which consists primarily of retail uses, are calculated at a ratio of five spaces for every thousand square feet of gross floor area. The Uniform Building Code requires a total of eight handicap-accessible parking spaces. The proposed site plan provides twelve accessible parking spaces. Combining the parking spaces already developed and the proposed spaces, the applicant proposes to have five hundred fifteen (515) spaces on site. Architecture and Landscaping A number of buildings have been approved and/or developed within the Jamboree Plaza Center since the District Regulations were adopted in 1991. All proposed buildings are required to be architecturally compatible with .the existing buildings and to use materials and colors similar to those on the existing buildings. The buildings.proposed to have Edinger Avenue frontage will incorporate more dramatic design elements, such as vaulted entry foyers and an increased use of accent tiles. A conceptual landscaping plan has been prepared which identifies the basic plant palette and desired character of the center. The landscaping plan, including the parking lot trees, the entry accent trees, the street frontage trees, and the shrubbery all conform to the original-landscape plan and are compatible with the existing landscaping. Environmental Analysis A Tiered Negative Declaration/Initial Study has been prepared for the project and is attached to this report (Attachment C). Based upon review of the proposed project and the previously certified Negative Declaration for Jamboree Plaza, it has been determined that environmental issues relating to this project have previously been addressed. Mitigation measures identified in the original Negative Declaration are included as conditions of approval. Therefore, staff City Council Report ZC 97-002 and TPM 97-164 November 3, 1997 Page 7 recommends that the City Council certify the Tiered Negative Declaration as adequate and find that the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been satisfied. ~Y (J'/EVA~s i s hn~~e r~l/ / Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachments: A - Location Map B - Submitted Plans C - Negative.Declaration D - Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556 E- Resolution Nos. 97-108 and 97-109; Ordinance No. 1191 BE:br:z~97002.cc ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP LO CATI 0 N MAP · . ,L(,4J~JNE CORPS · AIR STA nON · ,'/ ':.;; 5/. . .' · ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENTS B- 1 THROUGH B- 5 TENTATIVE MAP, SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS ' ~ ,ts., i!. ..,...~.....:::... ~.~ : _ .. ' ::'::- ~'.;/. ~J.. ' "~.~.." ~ ~2 '" . ::..: :.'..'.. :.:.4¢ i-~: ;~ i.,. :;: ~'~'~ .' :~ .,,.......:~ ):.:..~,- .: ... · "t:~ "'" ...~.... ,:. ;: ~ '.-?/.~.: ~-~ ' ~ .. .'-h' ~ ~ - I · '?' ~: " '1 ~ . : ' i~ , ,,, ~ ~,~ ~ 1' i l ATTACHMENT B-! I .o t~ 0 ATTACHMENT B-2 ATTACHMENT B-3 ATTACHMENT B-4 LU 0 ATTACHMENT B-5 ATTACHMENT C NEGATIVE DECLARATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3105 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Title: DESIGN REVIEW 97-016, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164, ZONE CHANGE 97-002 Project Location: NORTHWEST CORNER OF JAMBOREE ROAD AND EDINGER AVENUE, CITY OF TUSTIN. Project Description: MODIFICATION OF .DISTRICT REGULATIONS/SUBDIVISION FOR BUILDOUT OF Project Proponent:' A COMMERCIAL/RETAIL/INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK CALIFORNIA PACIFIC EQUITIES, LLC Lead Agency Contact Person: BRAD EVANSON Telephone: ( 714) 573- 3118 The Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study for the above project in accordance with the City'of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, and on the basis of that study hereby finds: That there is no substantial evidence that the. project may have a significant effect on the enviionment. That potential significant effects were identified, but revisions have been included in the project plans and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects wot~ld occur] Said Mitigation Measures are included in Attachment A of the Initial Study which is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required. · The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is attached and is on file at the ' Community Development Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this Negative Declaration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of Negative Declaration and extends for twenty (20) calendar days. Upon review by the Community Development Director, this review period may be extended if deemed necessary. 'REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 4:00 P.M. ON Date OCTOBER 8, 1997 NEGDEC.PM5 3704.A NOVEMBER 3, 1997 Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director ATTACHMENT C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714)573-3105 INITIAL STUDY BACKGROUND Project Title:. DESIGN REVIEW 97-016, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 ZONE CHANGI- 9/-UUZ JAMUOi<EE ?LAZA Lead Agency: . City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: gRAD FVAN.qON Project Location: N.W. CORNER OF EDINGER AVE AND Phone:_(714) 573-3118 JAMBOREE ROAD Project Sponsor's Name and Address: CALIFORNIA PACIFIC EQUITIES, LLC 18207 E. MCDURMOTT, SUITE E IRVINI-, CA ~Z/lqt ATT' GREG BUTCHER General Plan Designation: PC COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS ZorfingDesignation: PC -IND /PLANNED COMMUNITY - INDUSTRIAL) Project Description: DEVELOPMENT OF AN 8.63 ACRE PARCEL TO ACCOMMODATE APPRflXTMATF~ y 1PP,O00 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL, COMMERCIAL,. AUTO SERVICF AND INDUSTRIAL/OFFICE USES. Surrounding Uses: North __ OC. TA RAIl ROAD/COMMUTER_ East South 'MCAS-TUSTIN ' I~AIL 511L Other phblic agencies whose approval is required: [I Orange County Fire Authority ~ Oi-ange County Health Care Agency ~ South Coast Air Quality Management District [] Other 0 VACANT LAND ZONED PC-IND Wem MCAS-TUSTIN City oflrvine City of Santa Ana Orange County EMA B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist i.n Section D below. l--] Land Use and Planning Fl Hazards l-1 Population and Housing Fl Noise I] Geological Problems I] Public Services Fl Water 12 Utilities and Service Systems ' Fl Air Quality 12 Aesthetics 12 Transportation & Circulation 12 Cultural Resources 12 Biological Resources [I Recreation [3 Energy and Ivfineral Resources I] Mandatory Findings of Significance Ce Fl El [3 DETERMINATION: Oh the basis of'this initial evaluation: I find that tI~e proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATI\rE DECLARATION ,,,,'ill be prepared. I find that although the proposed, project could hive a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheets have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION x~511 be prepar0:l. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONM2ENTAL IMI~ACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant .effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect' I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation ~easures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant.Unless Mitigated." An ENVIRONrMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and ~2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially ~ignificant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier NrEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to app!icable standards., and 2) have been avoide.4 or mitigated pursuant to that earlier' NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. signature (~ ~~ ! ' ./.4 .. _~ Date OCTOBER 9 1997 Print Name BRADLEY. k. E~VA~ Title ASSISTANT PLANNER D. ENVIRONMEN'FAL IMPACTS: e O Earlier analyses used: NEGATIVE DECLARATION _ FOR DR 97-016,TPM 9~-164,ZC 97-002 Available for review at: City of Tustin Community Developme'nt Department LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict 'Mth applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible x~dth existing land uses in the vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operafi6ns? e) Disrupt or divide the p~'sical arrangement of an established community (including a Iow-income or minority community)? 2. POPULATION & HOUSING - Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or I°caI population projections? b) Induce substantial gro,a~h in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or emension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS - gould the proposal result in or expose people to potential hnpacts irrvolving: a) Fault rupture? · b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic e) Landslides or mudflows? f)' Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of land? h) Expa~nsive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? 4. WATER - Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. b) Exposure of people or property to ~ter related haT~ards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface x~mers or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? : d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e)' Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? Potentially Significant bnpact Potentially Significant Unless MitigatiOn Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 0 0 0 E3 E3 E3 0 0 0 0 0 0 E3 E] 0 E] 0 0 0 0 0 0 E] E3 0 E] El. 0 change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater othem4se available for public water supplies7 5. AIR QUALITY - Would the proposal: a) Violate any ah' quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants7 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? " TR.adqSPORTATION & CIRCULATION - Would the' proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to sa.fety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? . c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby usis? d) Insufficient parldng capacity onsite or offsite? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, watefoome or air traffic impacts? BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal habitat,, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g,, marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conscn'ation plans? b)' Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability ora known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region? ].'olenlialIy. Significant hnpcict l'olenliall), ,¥ignijScant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less lhan Significant Impact No hnpact F1 E] 0 E] 0 0 0 0 0 E] E] E] n []. n E] E] 0 0 E] E] E] E] 0 E] E] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E] E] 0 0 F1 0 0 0 0 n 0 E] E] E] 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. HAZARDS - l{'buld the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure ofpe0ple to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire tinT, rd in areas with flammable brush, grass, or tr~s? 10. NOISE - Would the proposal result in: 11. 12. a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise lex,els? PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government sen,ices in any of the following [~reas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other government services7 UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would theproposa'l result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) . Communications systems7 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities7 d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage7 0 Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional v,~ter supplies? 13. AESTHETICS - IffOuld the proposal: a) Affect a scenic ,,'ism or ~cenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? ]'otcntially Significant Impact l~otcnliallv giiligalion Incorporaled Le.s'x lhan Significanl Impact No hnpacl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES - I4~ould the pro,oosal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area7 15. RECREATION' I, Vould tl~e proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 16. MANDATORY FI2NDINGS OF SIGNnvlCANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or x~-ildlffe species, muse a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or ani'mal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) c) d) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Does the project have impacts that are inEvidually limited,, but cumulatively.considerable? C'Cumulatively. considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fUture projects). Does the project have environmental effects which cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either d/rectlv or indirectly? ]~olcnliallv .~ignificant l'otenfially Unlexx Lesx than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 0 0 0 O. 0 0 FI 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 [g 0 0 0 [~ E. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Please refer to Attachment A for an evaluation of the environmental impacts identified in'Section D above. INITSTUD. PM5 3702A ATTAC~IMENT A TIERED INITIAL STUDY RESPONSE JAMBOREE PLAZA - NEGATIVE DECLARATION DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUPPLEMENT - on June 3, 1991, ~he Tustin City Council adopted Resolution 91-75 which authorized the creation of the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations for the project site. The project site originally consisted of· approximately 24.4 acres subdivided to support approximately '202,000 square feet of retail, aut'o service, office' and industrial uses. A Negative Declaration was certified for the project. Since the project approval in 1991, approximately 26,000 square feet of building space has been developed, and approximately 3.67 acres of land originally planned for approximately 47,800 square feet of industrial/business park building space.has been sold to create, a commuter rail station. The remaining land had been configured to accommodate approximately 128,000 square feet of. industrial/business park and' retail uses. The proposed project is a Zone Change to amend the existing Jamboree Plaza District Regulations, regarding the configuration and amount, of proposed uses. The proposed project would result in a net decrease in total building area, with the amount of square footage per use changing. Building area' devoted to potential retail uses would increase from approximately 28,000 square feet to approximately 35,000 square feet, while the space devOted to industrial/business park uses would decrease from approximately t00,000 square feet to 85,000 square feet.- A total of 8.2' acres are proposed to be built upon.. As a companion to the Zone Change, a Tentative Parcel Map and Design Review are also included in the proposed project. They will allow for the.subdivision of the project area into twenty numbered parcels for the building sites and three lettered parcels for ingress/egress/parking purposes, as well as providing aesthetic review to the projeqt. This is a tiered initial'study that is based on and incorporates, by reference, the environmental'analysis included in the Negative Declaration adopted for Design Review 90-40, Zone Change 90-01, and Tentative parcel Maps 90-292 and 90-293 (certified on June 3, 1991) and supplements and addenda, as it relates to the subject property. In conformance with CEQA, the purpose of this tiered initial'study is to identify and focus the environmental analysis for the project on any significant new environmental impacts that were not previously considered in the June 3, 1991 Negative Declaration. The Negative Declaration identified'several impact'categories where impacts could be lessened to a level of insignificance .with the imposition of mitigation measures. Staff has reviewed each'of these impact Categories to ensure that no new project impacts associated with the project would occUr that were not identified in the June 3, 1991 Negative Declaration. Attachment A Tiered Initia!.'Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 2 Impact categories not identified to.have a potential~impact'in the Negative Declaration have been reviewed and identified in the initial study check list appropriately to ensure that the project would not create any additional significant impacts which were not considered by the Negative Declaration and cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. . LAND USE AND PLANNING a,b,c,d,e "No Impact" ~- The proposal would not result in any.substantial alterations to'the planned land uses for the area. 'This site has been .previously designated by' General Plan Amendment 89-02(b) as I (Industrial) and Zone Change 88-03 as PC-IND (Planned Community - industrial). Zone Change 90-01 maintained the PC-. IND designation while allowing for individual land use designations on the sites within the project area. Tentative Parcel Maps 90-292/293 and Design Review 90-40 placed the .project site under the' Jamboree Plaza District. Regulations, 'and a Negative Declaration was certified for those actions. Zone Change 97-002, Tentative Parcel Map 97-164 and Design Review 97-016 would'reconfigure the internal use designations and land divisions to reflect changes in and around, the project site. The types of uses intended for the site under the current proposal are intended to be consistent with the uses currently allowed under the existing Jamboree Plaza District Regulations, and ' those are consistent with surrounding uses. In addition, the district r~gulations will continue to reinforce the specifically prohibited uses within the Browning and GCA Corridor Easements as establiShed .by USMCAS-Tustin and recorded against the property. Sources: irvine Industrial Complex District Regulations. Jamboree Plaza District Regulations. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. . POPULATION ~ND ~OUSING a,b,c "No Impact" - since the project dOes not involve any residential development, it will not result in direct effects upon population and housing. However, the employment generated by the project may lead to an indirect population increase, ~thereby increasing demands upon housing. It is more.likely that a substantial portion of .the employees generated by the proj'ect will already reside in the City or neighboring communities and not create a large demand for additional housing. The proposed development would not affect housing as.no housing units would be displaced or proposed. Existing neighborhood and new residential areas are presently being developed in the area known as Tustin Ranch which are anticipated to support the project. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97x164, ZC 97-002 Page 3 , Sources: City of Tustin Community Development Department. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS a,b,d,e,i "No Impact" - As there are no instances of seismic faults nor potential for volcanic activity, tsunami, or unique geologic or physical features, the project will not expose people to these hazards. Sources: City of Tustin Building Division. Standard Procedures for Design Review for the Community Development Department. · Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None R~quired. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS c,f,g,h "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" - The proposed, project will require modifications to the soil through grading, excavation and fill, which has the potential to expose people to liquefaction, erosion, land subsidence and expansive soils. Appropriate methods of site preparation will be required during construction activities. Said methods shall be in accordance with the City's Grading and Excavation Code, the City of Tustin Grading Manual and the Uniform Building Code. Sources: City of Tustin Building Division. Standard Procedures for Design Review for the Community Development Department. Mitigatioh Measures/Monitoring Required: a · Precise grading plans for the property shall be developed .in accordance with applicable requirements of the'City of Tustin Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual whiCh would include requirements for soil excavation, compaCtion and ~fill. In addition, a complete soils report shall be submitted to the City during the plan check 'process. The Building Division would be responsible for all plan checking and inspection for the site related to site improvements. The Police Department would respond to any complaints received during nonbusiness hours related to construction activities. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response ~Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 4 4. WATER a ,,Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" - The proposed project would add impervious surface area with parking lots and building on the property which could effect drainage and absorption rates. Appropriate drainage of the site~would be designed into the project and would be required through the plan check and construction process in accordance with the City's Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual to reduce any potential impacts of drainage. Sources: City of Tustin Building Division. City of Tustin Public Works Department. Mitigation Measure's/Monitoring Required: a. Precise grading plans for the property shall be developed in accordance with applicable requirements of the City of Tustin Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual which would include requirements for'erosion control and site' drainage. The Building Division would be responsible for all. plan checking and inspection for the site related to site improvements, including private drainage systems and would'monitor progress of the site for continued compliance with the grading requirements. The Police Department would respond to any complaints received during nonbusiness hours related to construction activities. WATER b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i "No Impact" - The proposed project would not result .in any change to water movement, flood'waters, discharge into surface waters, flow of ground water, quantity of ground water as there are no water courses on the site based upon field observations. · Sources: City of Tustin Building Division. City of Tustin Public Works Department. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. AIR QUALITY a,c,d "No Impact" - The proposed project .would not' result in any degradation of existing air quality based .upon SCAQMD guidelines for preparation of EIRs: The project also will not alter air movements or cause any other changes in climate, nor will it' create any objectional odors. Sources: SCAQMD Standards for Preparing EIR Documents. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 5 · AIR QUALITY b "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" - The proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to pollutants in that there may be specific tenants or users that would be subject to separate SCAQMD requirements such as Regulation XV for trip reduction or other permit procedures for. industrial uses. There may also be short term impacts during the grading and construction stages of development due to dust. Sources: SCAQMD Standards for Preparing EiR Documents. SCAQMD Regulation XV. ' City of Tustin Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: a · b · Ail proposed uses shall comply with all applicable SCAQMD · permitting requirements and shall utilize BACT · procedures. Ail earthwork shall utilize dust control procedures as outlined in the City of Tustin Grading and Excavation Code and Grading Manual. TRANSPORTATION ~ CIRCULATION a,d "Less than Significant" - During the original approval for Jamboree Plaza in 1991, KHR Associates prepared a comprehensive traffic Study to identify specific impacts to the circulation system and offer mitigation measures for those impacts. A number improvements have 'been made to the circulation system within the vicinity of Jamboree Plaza, including some of the original mitigation measures. These include: the opening of Jamboree Road between Edinger Avenue and Barranca Parkway; the creation of the Edinger Avenue/Plaza Entrance a~dEdinger Avenue/Jamboree Road intersections; and widening, raised medians, and acceleratiOn/deceleration lanes on Edinger .Avenue. KHR Associates recently completed an. updaSe to the original · Traffic ~mpact Study for Jamboree Plaza, to reflect the changes in the. development plan for Jamboree Plaza.. The KHR Associates Traffic Study Update is incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Appendix A. Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue~re within the Orange County Transportation Authority's Cohgestion Management Program (CMP) which means that future projects ~that add more than 2,400 trips total to a CMP roadway, or more. than 1,600 trips directly onto a CMP highway, are required to prepare a detailed CMP Traffic Impac~ Analysis (TIA~. The original Jamboree Plaza development plan was Attachment A '. Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 6 ~prepared and approved in 1991, and therefore only the net increase in vehicle trips generated by the new development plan are evaluated for TIA requirements. 3,801 daily trips were estimated for the original plan, and 5,052 daily trips were estimated with the new development plan - a net increase of 1,251 daily trips. This is less than the TIA threshold of 1,600 daily trips, and therefore the proposed project does not require a CMP TIA. Sources: City of Tustin Public Works Department. KHR Traffic Study Update Dated September 3, 1997. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Re'quired: Non~ Required. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION b,c,e,f,g "No Impact" - The proposed project is being designed to lessen or eliminate hazards resulting from internal circulation, incompatible uses, or emergency access. On-site parking, both quantity and configuration is to be provided, in compliance with the Tustin City Code and the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations.. The proposed project also incorporates design elements that encourage compatibility with alternate methods of transportation (e.g. bus and rail transportation). The proposed project, due to its.location within the Browning GCA Corridor is being designed t~ eliminate impacts to airborne traffic. Sources: City. of Tustin Community Development Department. City of Tustin Public Works Department. Orange County Fire Authority. Orange. County Transportation Authority. USMCAS-Tustin. Mitigation Measures/MonitOring Required: None ReqUired. . BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a,b,c,d,e "No Impact" - The site is free from any significant populations of animals, fish or wildlife, as well as any migration corridors. The site is also free from any Significant plant life, with the exception of common weeds and grasses. .The~ pr~oposed project would add a significant amount of landscaping, 0including trees, shrubs and groundcovers in accordance with the City's Landscaping Irrigation and Submittal Requirements and District Regulations. · Sources: Field Observations. Proposed Development Plans. Landscaping Irrigation and Submittal Requirements. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 7 o ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES a,b,c "No Impact" - The proposed project would comply with adopted.energy conservation plans, in both the' construction of the project and upon cQmpletion, daily operations. It would also result in. the use'of natural resources associated with development of the project and daily operations. Given the scale of potential development, the use of natural resources is not anticipated to be a faCtor in development of this property. Sources: City of Tustin Public Works Department. City of Tustin Community Development Department. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. · ~tAZARDS a,c~,d "Less Than Significant" - The proposed, project would result in a greater potential to. create health hazards or expose people to hazardous situations due to the fact that the site will be developed from its present.vacant condition. However, the project itself would not result in a sighificant risk of exposure to hazards or hazardous situations. All applicable Building Department and Fire Department regulations and Codes would apply to all site construction, as well as any tenant improvements,, including those industrial uses, which may contain materials more sensitive to explosion or fire which would reduce the potential for exposure to hazardous situations to an acceptable level. The site is located within the approach path to USMCAS-Tustin (Browning Corridor) which currently operates military rotary wing and tilt rotor aircraft. The existing easement agreement specifically prohibits certain uses in order to reduce the risk of upset. Those uses are specifically identified in the proposed District Regulations. Sources: City of Tustin Building·Division3 Orange County Fire Authority. USMCAS-Tustin. Ja~boree Plaza District Regulations. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Ail conStruction sh~ll be developed in aCcordance~with, but not limited to, all applicable Uniform Building Codes and Fire Codes. The Community Development Department would monitor for compliance with the Building Codes while the Fire Authority would be responsible for monitoring ~pplicable Fire Codes. Attachment A' Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 8 t{AZARDS b,e "No Impact" - The proposed project site is currently vacant, except for common grasses and weeds. The development of the site will include irrigated landscaping and groundcover, as well as appropriate fire-fighting equipment (fire hydrants, etc.). The proposed project will also comply with all applicable emergency response and/or evacuation plans. Sources: Field Observations. · Landscaping I~rigation and Submittal Requirements. Orange County Fire Authority. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. i0. NOISE a,b ,'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated - The actual leyel °of noise generated by the project and from anticipated uses could, vary significantly, office and retail uses tend to not generate a signif$cant amount of noise, while auto service and" industrial uses have .the potential to generate more significant noise. Standards have been provided in the Planned Community District Regulations to ensure that any and all uses would be required to comply with the City of Tustin NOise Ordinance which in part limits noise.levels to 65 dba. The potential exists for short term noise impacts associated with construction activities. However-, there are no noise sensitive uses, such as residential uses in the immediate vicinity of this project. There are 'existing noise sources in the ~area that could generate noise for the proposed project. The site is tocated within the approach path to 'USMCAS-Tustin (Browning Corridor) which currently operates military rotary wing and tilt rotor aircraft. Roadway noise from Edinger Street and Jamboree Road could also generate noise for prospective tenants. Sources: City Of Tustin Zoning Code. City of Tustin General Plan Noise Element. USMCAS, Tust in. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: a · A· final acoustical analysis report describing the acoustical design features of the structures required t6 satisfy the exterior noise standards of 70 dba shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for approval along with satisfactory evidence which indicates that the sound attenuation measures specified in the approved acoustical reports have been incorporated into the design of the project. The acOustical analysis shall be prepared by an expert or authority in the field of Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 9 acoustics. Since the project is located within the Browning Corridor, the acoustical analysis shall also provide information and mitigate'impacts of single event noise events generated from helicopter flyovers. b. - Ail uses and tenants on the site would be required to comply at all times with the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance related to generation of noise. C · Ail construction operations, including engine warm-up and deliveries of materials and equipment,, shall be subject to the provisions of the Tustin Noise'Ordinance and shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, unless otherwise determined by the Building Official. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES a,b,c,d, e "No Impact" - Ail services are existing and are adequate to service the proposed development. The availability of public services (i.e. Police, Fire and City Maintenance) to adequately-serve the development is anticipated to be adequate. Sources: City of Tustin Community Development Department. City of Tustin Public Works Department. City of Tustin Police Department. Orange County Fire Authority. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. 12.. UTILITIES a,b,c,d,e,f,g "No Impact" - The site is'in an urban 'area with all utilities available to the site. from Edinger Street and through public utility easements along the north property line-which would be adequate to accommodate the proposed development. Pacific Bell, Irvine Ranch Water District and Southern California Gas Company have indicated that the proposed project could be served without impact on existing facilities. Sources: Pacific Bell. Irvine Ranch Water District. Southern California Gas Company. City of Tustin Public Works Department. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Requ'ired. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 10 13. AESTHETICS a "No Impact" - There are no occurrences of scenic vistas or scenic highways within the vicinity of the proposed project. Sources: Community Development Department. Field Observations. 'Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. 2~ESTEETICS b,c "Less Than Si~niflcant" - The proposed project · is subject to the City's Design Review process which takes- into consideration site layout, architecture, landscaping and other project amenities which relate to the physical~ appearance of the site. The proposed District Regulations provide specific'development standards which have been incorporated into the project such specific building setbacks, landscape setbacks and landscape berming along Edinger Street. The proposed District Regulations-closely resemble existing standards for both the Irvine Industrial Complex-Tustin ,properties to the ~north, as well as the existing Phase I development at Jamboree Plaza. .All aesthetic Concerns of the. City have been incorporated into the project plans or included as conditions of approval. The proposed project would add new lighting to the property, primarily as.a result of parking lot, pedestrian arcade and service drive lighting for security and safety purposes. The proposed project lighting would be designed to satisfy the minimum lighting requirements of the City.of'Tustin Security Code. Sources:· City of Tustin Design Review Board. Proposed Development Plans. City of Tustin Security Ordinance. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: Ail project lighting shall be .developed in accordance 'with the City of Tustin's Security Ordinance which would establish minimum lighting levels for parking lots and · pedestrian areas. be Ail lighting shall be designed and arranged so as to 'confine any light or glare rays to the property. Attachment A Tiered Initial Study Response Jamboree Plaza - Negative Declaration DR 97-016, TPM 97-164, ZC 97-002 Page 11 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES a,b,c,d "No Impact" - The proposed project would not have any effect on cultural resources in that the General Plan does not identify any cultural resources on this property or in the immediate vicinity. Sources: City of Tustin General Plan. City of Tustin Historic Resources Survey. Mitigation M&asures/Monitoring Required: None Required. 15. RECREATION a,b "No Impact" - The proposed uses would'not result in an increased need'for recreational opportunities. Industrial and commercial uses typically do not demand extensive recreational amenities from the community as do residential land uses. Sources: City of Tustin Community Services Department. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: None Required. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - Based upon the analysis presented in this initial'study and consideration of comments received during the public review period, the proposed project would not result in any adverse environmental'impacts that could not be mitigated through imposition of conditions -'or incorporation into the development plans. The most apparent potential impact of this project is related to traffic and the need for project related street improvements in the immediate vicinity. Sources: As Previously Noted. Mitigation Measures/Monitoring Required: As Previously. Noted. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS October 6, 1997 Mr. Gregory L. Butcher California Pacific Equities, LLC 18207 E. McDurmott, Ste. E Irvine, California 92614 SUBJECT: REVISED ANALYSIS UPDATE OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TO REFLECT NEW JAMBOREE PLAZA DEVELOPMENT PLAN ' Dear Mr. Butcher: The'following'is an updated analysis of the anticipated impacts associated with the new development 'plan for Jamboree Plaza, located on Edinger Avenue, near its intersection with 'Jamboree Road in the City of Tustin, California. in May 1991, KHR ASsociates completed the "Traffic Impact Analysis" for Jamboree Plaza 'which included a comprehensive study' of traffic, circulation and parking issues related to the original development plan. Since that time, a portion of the plaza has been constructed, while much of the plaza has yet to be developed. Subsequently, a new development plan for the remaining portion of the plaza has been 'prepared and the City of Tustin has expressed concern over the possible increase' in traffic impacts. This analysis provides a · update of potential' traffic impacts that may occur with the new Jamboree Plaza development plan. The fOllowing sections of this ar~alYsis describe the project location and newly proposed development plan, findings from the original traffic impact study, an update of existing conditions (since 1991),. and description of anticipated impacts that may result from the new proposal. The 'findings, conclusions, and recommendations pr. esented in this analysis were independently determined by KHR Associates and are not necessarily shared by others.' · · .- ''PROJECT BACKGROUND · . .' Jamboree Plaza is i(~cated on the northwest quadrant of Edinger Avenue.and Jamboree Road in the City of Tustin,'California. The triangularly:shaped site is approximately 17.5 acres in size and bounded by Edinger Avenue to the south, the OCTNSCRRA railwaY to the north, and Jamboree Road to the east: Adjacent land uses inclUde the Tustin U.S. Marine Corps Air Station to the south (across'Edinger Avenue), large vacant'parcels of residentially-zoned land .to the east, and light 'industrial u'ses to the north" (across the r~iiroad tracks): .The portion of Jamboree Plaza that has been completed includes the' area between the eastern access road and Jamboree Road. Existing deve!opment includes'a fast-food restaur, ant and various auto service-facilities. .. · ..,.-. · '" The undeveloped l~°r:tion of the"$ite is pi°p(~sed·to include a trai~ station in the northeast borner of the property, a gas station site at the southeast corner of Edinger Avenue and the' main entrar~ce, and several retail/office/light industrial buildings. The recently submitted jamboree Plaza site plan (714)756-6440 3347 Michelson Drive - Suite 490' Irvine, California 92612 Fax (714 756-6444 Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 2 includes only the new retail/office/light industrial facilities, along with their associated parking areas (see the attached Figure 1 - Proposed Site plan). The train station and gas station will be developed as separate unrelated projects. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM PREVIOUS STUDY The following is a summary of the key findings and conclusions prese.nted in the Traffic Impact Study prepared for the 'original Jamboree Plaza development plan: Existing traffic volumes recorded at nine intersections within the vicinity of the site (taken in February, 1991) were used to determine existing intersection levels of service (LOS). The LOS calculations found that all intersections, with the exception of the' intersections of Edinger Avenue/Redhill Avenue, and Edinger Avenue/Harvard Avenue were operating at LOS "C" or better during both A.M. and P.M. peak hours. All studied roadway segments were found to operate within LOS "A". ' Based on the preferred development alternative (which includes retail, business park, restaurant, and car wash land uses), the original project was estimated to generate a total of 7,878 vehicle trip ends per average weekday. During the A.M. and P.M. peak. hours, 608 and 637 vehicle trip ends, respectively, were projected to be generated by the. original development (see. Table I). '. TABLE I Original Jamboree Plaza Development Plan & Trip Generation Rates · Daily Trip Ends ' A.M. Peak Land Use ' Units Factor~ . Volume Factor~ Volume P.M. Peak Factor~ Volume Business Park Service station Retail Restaurant Car Wash2" · 174.251 K.S.F. 13.46 2,346 1.49 2 Stations 748.00 1,496 25.00 28.113 K.S.F. 38.10 1,071 1.14 2.640 K.S.Fi 632.13 1,669 64.28 5 Stalls 259.20 1,296 19.20 260' 1.53 266 50 . 31.00 62 32 3.43 96 170 ' 44.48 117 96 19.20 96 TOTALS 7,878 608 637 Notes: ' . 1) Source -Tdps Per Unit from Trip Generation Manual, 4t~ Edition Update, Institute of Transportation Engineers; 1987 (except A.M. ~nd P.M. Peak 'hour f~ctors for retail are from 'Traffic Generators,' San Diego Association of Governments, January 1990). 2) Source -Tdps Per Unit from 'Tustin Auto Spa Traffic Impact Analysis,'.KHR Associates, June 1990.' · · ". · '· Under'existing plus' project conditions, the roadway segments of Edinger Avenue and Jamb0~ee Road in the vicinity .of the ~ite were' not expected to be adversely impacted bY the increaSe in " 'traffic from Jamboree Piaza.-Most intersections analyzed under the "Intersection Capacity Utilization" (ICU) method of'determining LOS, were not adversely impacted by the' original : - Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 3 development, with the exception of the Edinger Avenue/Jamboree Road intersection which deteriorated to LOS "D" during the A.M. peak hour. · BaSed upon trip generation and turn movement estimates added to existing roadway traffic on Edi.nger Avenue, the new intersection of Edinger Avenue and the plaza entrance was estimated to operate at LOS "A" during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, under the ICU method. · Traffic accident data for the roadway segments of Edinger Avenue and Jamboree Road, in the vicinity of the project site, and the Edinger Avenue/Jamboree Road intersection were found to have typical accident rates for major roadways. '. · A tOtal of 687 parking spaces'was to be .provided o~ the site. Empirical analysis indicates that the peak on-site parking demand will require, at most, 489 spaceS -leaving 198 spaces (or 28.8%) as a reserve parking SuPply..¥herefore, adverse parking impacts were not anticipated. UPDATE OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Since the original study was completed in 1991, there have been numerous improvements made to roadways and intersections within the vicinity of Jamboree Plaza. The most significant improvement Was the opening of Jamboree Road,' between Edinger Avenue and Barranca Parkway. Other improvements include: the 'creation of the Edinger Avenue/Plaza Entrance and Edinger Avenue/Jamboree Road intersections; and widening, raised medians, and acceleration and deceleration lanes on Edinger Avenue as part of the Jamboree Plaza development. · , Updated daily traffic volume counts (taken in October 19~6) for segments of Edinger Avenue and Jamboree Plaza near the project site, reflect some changes over the five-year period. Volumes on Edinger AvenUe, between Jamboree Road and Harvard Avenue, increased from .16,200 to 19,352 vehicles per day (approximately 12 percent increase). Edinger Avenue, between Jamboree Road and Red Hill Avenue decreased from 16,700 to 15,975 vehicles per day (app.roximately 4 percent decrease).' Traffic volume " counts sheets for these locations are attached to this report. Applying these more recent volumes toward the roadway capacity for these segments (i.e., .four lane divided highw, ay at 35,500 vehicles per day) results in LOS "A" for both segments. . · JambOree ROad, between Edi~ger Avenue and Walnut Avenue increased from 13,300 to 44,113 vehicles'per day (more than 300 percent increase). The significant increase in traffic volumes on. jamboree Road is primarily due to the opening of jamboree Road between Edinger Avenue and Barranca Parkway~ Jamboree ROad, between Edinger Avenue and Warner A~enue recorded 38,344 vehicles per day. Applying these more recent ~olumes toward the roadway capacity for these segm'ents (i:e., six lane divided highway at 56,300 .vehicles.per day) results in LOS "B" for Jamboree' Road, south.of Eding~r. A.venue, and LOS ".C", north o.f. Edinger Avenue... . . . · . · . , . The intersection. Of .Jamboree Road and' Edinge~'Avenue includes m'ultiple, lanes on all foQr legs, controlled' by a' traffic signal. Recent v0iume'c°unts' for this. intersection" and' ICU calculations (S'LJpplied by the CitY of Tustin) indiCate that thi~, in{er:section is Operating within LOS "D" dudng the · A.M. and P.M. peak hours.' The existing'cOUnt data is attached .to ~this report. · AdditionallY,, since th'e 1991 study; some ~3f the original development within Jamboree plaza has. been completed, including the area between the eastern access road and Jamboree Road. Existing development includes a fast-food 'restaurant and various'auto"service facilities. For comparison Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 4 purposes between the originaI plan and the new development plan, trip generation estimates under the original scenario were updated with the completed facilities subtracted out of the trip estimate totals. Estimates of business park square footage, as well as a restaurant, a car wash, and one service station were discounted in the updated estimate. The updated trip generation estimate can then be compared to the new proposal. Table II lists the updated trip generation estimate under the original development plan. NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN -TRIP GENERATION The new development plan includes much of the same land uses as the original plan (i.e., retail and office use), however, there are some differences in building square, footage, plus the inclusion of a · future train station. Additionally, the new development plan includes an option of using 59,270 square feet for either business park use, or retail use. Retail use typically generates more traffic than business Park'use and was therefore used t0 r~present "worst case" conditions. Table II! lists the new land us.es, square footage, and estimated trip generation from each PrOPosed land use. · . TABLE II Updated Original Jamboree Plaza Development Plan & Trip Generation Rates Land Use Business Park Service Station Retail Daily Trip Ends A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Units Factor~ Volume Factor~ Volume Factor~ Volume · , 147.251 K.S.F. 13.46 1,982 1.49 219 1 Station · 748.00 748 25.00 25 28.113 K.S.F. 38.10 1,071 1.14 32 1.53 225 31.00 31 3.43 96 TOTALS 3,801 276 - 352 Notes: . 1) Source- Tdps Per Unit from Tdp Generation Manual, 4m Edition. Update, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987 (except A.M. and P.M. peak hour factors for retail are from 'Traffic Generators,' San Diego Association of G~)vemments, January 1990). · · As shown in Tables I! and Iil, the new development plan for Jamboree PlaZa is anticipated to result in more vehicle trips, for the daily and P.M. peak hour time periods.. The daily difference is 1,251 vehicle trips (a 33 percent increase), and the P.M. peak'hour difference is 86 vehicle tdps (a 24 percent increase). The A.M. peak hoUr estimate is less for the new plar~ by' 3'1 trips. The differences in the two trip generation scenario§ are primarily due to the reduced-amobnt of busines§ park area and the' increased amount of retail area in Table' i11. Retail land uses typically, generate more traffic · during the daily and P.M. peak hour time periods; and'leSs'in th~ A.M. peak .hour due to typical retail business hours of operation. .'. - · · . . · · .. · ... . Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 5 TABLE !il New Jamboree Plaza Development Plan & Trip Generation Rates proposed Land Use Daily Trip Ends A.M. Peak · P.M. Peak Unit _Facto_r~ yolume Facto_r~' Volume Facto_ri Volume Business Park 41.860 K.S.F. 13.46 563 1.49 62 1.53 64 Service Station 1 Station 748.00 748 25.00 25 31.00 31 Retail 80.875 K.S.F. 38.10 3,081 1.14 92 .. 3.43 277 Train Station2 660 .. 66 66 TOTALS 5,052 245 438 Notes: ' 1) Source- Trips Per Unit from Trip Generation Manual, 4~ Edition Update, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987 (except A.M. and P.M. peak hour factors for retail are from 'Traffic Generators,' San Diego Association of Governments, January 1~90). 2) Train Station estimates based upon 100% occupancy of 330 proposed parking spaces serving the station. Peak hour volumes were assumed to be 10% of the dailytotals. NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN -'TRAFFIC IMPACTS The projected'number of daily traffic genera{ed by the new development plan was then added to the. surrounding roadway system to estimate the magnitude of 'impacts that may occur with the completion of the plaza. The 5,052 additional'trips were distributed'onto'Edinger Avenue and. Jamboree Road in the following manner: .. *., · 20% (or 1,010 trips) on Edinger Avenue, between Jamboree Plaza entrance and Red Hill Ave., · 20% (or 1,010 trips) on Edinger Avenue, between Jamboree Road and Harvard Avenue, · 25% (or 1,263 trips) on Jamboree Road, south of Edinger Avenue; and · 35% (or 1,769.trips) On Jamboree Road, north of Edinger Avenue. · , Adding these volumes onto the most recent count data for their respective roadway segments (taken in October.1996) results in the following estimated volumels' and levels of service:" . · 1'6,985 [tips on Edinger Avenue, between the Plaza entrance and Red Hill Ave. Los "A", · 20,362 tdps'on Edinger Avenue, between Jamboree Road and Ham~rd Avenue - LOS "A", ', 39,607'trips on Jamboree Road,' south of Edinger Avenue - LOS "C"; and. . · · 45,882 trips on JambOree Road, north .of. Edinger Avenue - L..OS."D". .. , . As indicatedl the levels of service foi" the segments of Edinger Avenue,' west of the pl~iz'a entrance and east Of Jamboree Road remain unchanged with.the buildout ~)f the new deveiopment plan: The segment of Jamboree Road, south of Edinger Avenue decreased from LOS'."B" to LOS ."C", and the segment of Jamboree Road, ' north of Edinger Avenue decreased from LOS "C" to LOS "D".' .. · ; Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 6 The operational conditions of the intersection of Edinger Avenue and the main plaza entrance is not anticipated to be adversely impacted by the new development plan. Applying the new estimate of trips generated during the P.M. peak hour to the turn. movement assumptions presented in the 1991 study resulted in an acceptable estimate of LOS "B" for this intersection during the P.M. peak hour. The ICU calculation sheet is attached to this report. P.M. peak hour trips generated by the proposed development were then distributed through the various movements of the Jamboree Road/Edinger Avenue intersection, based upon regional roadway network conditions and existing turn count data. The existing plus project traffic volumes were then used to calculate the projected LOS of this intersection during the P.M. peak hour with project buildout. The ICU calculation sheet (attached to this report) indicates that even with the slight increase in traffic volumes, the intersection is projected to continue to Operate at LOS "D" with existing plus Project conditions. The lCU calculation sheet is attached to this report. Long-range projections of traffic Volumes traveling through the Jamboree Road/Edinger Avenue intersection were used to estimate the future "long-range" plus project operating conditions of this intersection dudng the P.M. peak hour. Long-range operating conditions and traffic volumes are affected by the future grade separation improvements of this intersection. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the long-range volumes, supplied by the City, to estimate the LOS under this condition. The ICU'calculation sheet (attached to this report) indicates a projected ICU value of .872 under long-range plus project' conditions, which is slightly higher than the City's IongLrange projection of .84, This slight increase does not represent a significant impact and the intersection is projected to continue to operate at LOS "D" with long-range plus project conditions. The lCU calculation sheet is attached to this report. " · · . CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue are within the Orange County Transportation Authority's Congestion Management Program (CMP) which means that future projects that contribute a significant amount of traffic onto-these roadways require a detailed CMP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Projects exempt from the TIA requirement.will not add more than 2,400 trips total to a CMP roadway, or' more than 1,600 trips directly onto a CMP highway.. CMP policy also states that a TIA is not required for prOjects approved prior to. the effective date of CMP TIA requirements (i.e., January 1992).-Furthermore,. intersections' of 'roadways within the CMP (i.e., Jamboree RoadlEdinger Avenue) are 'permitted to operate a LOS "E", or better without requi'r!ng a traffic study. The origi'nal jamboree Plaza development plan was prepared and' approved .in 1991, and therefore only .the net increase in veliicle trips generated by' the new development plan are evaluated for TIA requirements. As'show in Table's !1 and Iil, 3,801 daily trips W~re estimated for the o¢iginai plan, and 5,052.daily trips were estimated with the new deVelOpment plan - a net increase of 1,251 daily trips. .The 1,251 additional trips iS less.than the.TIA requirement threshold of 1,600 .trips per day, and therefore th~ new Jamboree Plaza development plan does not'require a CMP TIA. · · ~ . : .-, . · ;. ; ~. -. . ' . . . coNcLusIons" ".. '" " -. · The'new 'Jamboree Plaza development plan. sEouid not result in any significant adv&rse impacts to the surrounding 'roadways or intersections. The 1991 study recommended several mitigation Mr. Gregory Butcher October 6, 1997 Page # 7 measures to help alleviate adverse 'conditions at that time, and since then, several of these improvements have been made. Although additional trips will be generated by the new development plan, the current roadway network surrounding the property should adequately carry the estimated increase in traffic. IN CLOSING In closing, we at KHR Associates hope that this TeChnical Note/Analysis Update of the Jamboree Plaza Traffic Impact Study sufficiently addresses the concerns the City may have regarding traffic impacts associated with the new Jamboree Plaza developmen.t plan. If there are any questions regarding this information, please call do not hesitate to call me at your convenience. Sincerely yours, - · KHR Associates President FILENAME: L-CPE-JP.DOC .o NOTE: SITE PLAN PREPARED BY ARCHITECTS ORANGE FIGURE 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS 3347 I,(ichelson Drk, e. Suite 490 Irv;ne, Califomia 92612 (714) 756-6440 Fax (714) 756-6444 · 12'00 F.~X 7147345991 TL'STIN P[BLIC wORKS.'E.XG ~ UU~ TRA':F!C DATA ~ERVIO£S, INC. - ' ' . ?CATI? COD{ 10507.044 TDt[ NB £B TOTAL TIM~ NB 55 TOTAL 12:00 - I2:!5 30 iS '48 12:00 - 12:'15 28~ ~BB - 574 12:15 - !2:30 25 1~ 37 12:15 - 12:30 294 272 !~:~0 - !2:4~ 19 ~ 28 12:30 - 12:45 259 255 545 12:~5 - 1:00 13 85 ~ 48 21 134 12:45 - I:00 289 1128 299 !!~S 5~2 22~2 I:00 - !:15 12 6 'lB 1:00- 1:!5 30S 310 519 I:I~ - !:30 18 12 28 I:15 - !:30 2~7 208 573 !:~0 - ~:~5 11 15 26 1:30 - 1:45 2~0 274 ~:45. - 2:00 ..~' ..:~ i0 43 24 ..e: 1:45 - 2:00 222 !0~8 2~3 1139 491 22~7 2:00- 2:!5 12 4 !{5 2:00- 2:15 2-°2 274 2:!5- 2:20 !-{ 7 20 2:!$- 2:30 288 24-~ 2:30- 2:45 8 8 10 2:30- 2:45 3.:0 273 ..,5 3:00 ~ 2~ 8 27 14 E~ 2:4~ 3:00 '295 !23~ 215 !010 ~:¢-~ - 3:i5 8 ~ !4 3:00 - 3:10 32~ 2~g ~:!~ - 2:20 i2 10 22 3:!5- 3:30 221 23~ 2:20 - 3:45 3 14 17 3:30 - 3:45 428 273 70! 2:45 - 4:09 m. 29 ~c.. 45 2! 74 3:45 - 4:00 417 ...-~':~ 25~ 1005 ... 24~9 4:00 - 4:!5 ~ 8 I4 4:00 - 4:15 c.39 230 759 4:I5 - 4:30 E 12 18 4:15 - 4:30 484 2S~ 750 4:~0 - 4:4~ 12 20 50 4:30 - 4:45 647 222 £59 .4:45 - 5:00 20 44 48 105 ~ !50 4:45 - S:O0 ~38 230~ 278 3~04 5:~ - 5:!$ 12 52 8! $:00- 5:10 745 225 107! ~:I~ - 5:~0 2~ 82 '~ 10~ S:I~- 5:30 742 2!8 i053 £:~0 - 5:45 40 15~ 1~ S:30 - 5:40 5~4 2~2 9~3 5:45 - $:00 54 132 ISB .475 · 220 607 5:45 - B:O0 7BE 2917 277 1220 !0:~ S:O§ - E:!S 4~ I52 19~ S:00 - 6:!S 580 245 525 E:!S - B:~O 72 248 318 $:15 - 8:30 SOB 235 743 5:33 - 5:4£ ~5 344 43~ B:30 - 6:45 380 230 ~:45 - 7:00 12~. '3~! 524 12~6 -6~2 !607 6:45 - 7:00 228 1796 !8: ~94 5!2 7:00 - 7:!5 !49 50! E5O 7:DO - 7:1S 284 134 ?:!5 - 7:33 !42 670 8!~ 7:!5 - 7:30 223 7:30 - 7:45 !5~ ~2 958 7:30 - 7:45 20~ 7::5 - $:00 124 '581 8~0 2853 · !004'3434 7:45 - 8:00 150 863 !14 4!3 322 !347 8:00 - ~:!5 !82 850 1032 8:00 - 8:!5 !28 75 8:!5 - $:30 i93 848. 104I $:!$ - ~:30 137 68 ~:~0 - ~:45 20~ B7! 879 8:30 - 8:45 108 88 2:45 - S:O0 158 75! 58~ 2957 75G 3708 8:4~ - ~:00 124 455 74 _'55 202 205 !.~$ !98 $:gO - ~:15 172 457 534 9:00 - S:10 135 74 9:!5 - 9:30 157 352 509 S:iS - ~:30 55 72 ~:2C - o.,: ~ 2~$ 430 9:30 - 9:45 90 59 ...... :~ 10:00 390 ES ~:~5 !0:00 !55 B37 ~20 1322 ~ ~m~ 9:45 - 9~ 271 2!0 l!~ 14~ !0:00 lO:~ ~74 2nm 382 10:00 - 10:1£ 100 !0:15 - 10:30 155 2!B 382 10:!5 - i0:30 78 40 ~n'~O - ~'-5 202 · 2~ 434 10:30 - 10:45 !0:45 - 11:00 205 74~ 237 893 443 !~41 10:~5 - 11:00 57 302 44 !59 !0! 1!:00 - 1!:!5 2i6 ZiO 428 11:00 - 11:15 50 43 93 · .c . ... l!:lS 1i:30 1:::_ 3~'50 247 23[ 478 - 471 !!:]0 - !1:45 2~5 241 487 1!:30 - !1:45 3B 27 55 '~-4c ~.~n ~c~ ~Tq 246 ~ ~ an~ ~ · -00 ~ c 59 .;; . - ..... .: ...... 28 5.. I..~ .1,45 - 12. 37 .7. 22 1!4 289 ~OlA[S 4.4~& 10.9B1 !5,~79 14,292 ~.753 ~2~?~Jr/ ADT'S . 18.~20 19.7~4 . . . 05/26/9? -o .12:01 FA_~ 7147345991 II.'STI.X PUBLIC t~ORKS."E*'G 003 !Z:15 - 12:33 23' !8 41 12:!5 - !2:30 345 2~3 ES9 12:~0 - !2:45 22 14 38 12:30 ~ I2:45 253 320 £93 !2:45 - !:GO 18 57 8' 54 24 151 12:45 - I:00 338 1274 375 1333 714 25~7 TRAFFIC ~A?A SERVICES, !NC. ---,]~ ........ w,,......~-=:~ LOCATION COD~ 10807.045 LOC~OS'- JkHBOREE-BTN EDINS~/~'~NU " A'~D VOLUMES FOR- rH~:DAY '0/~4/98 TO ~,! A TiME~ ' ' ' SB TOTAL TIME N~ SB !2:00 - !2'15 24 26 50 I2:00 - i2:15 307 344 ~51 l:O0 - 1:15 !0 !0 20 1:00- 1:15 335 316 85! !:!5 - 1:30 19 i1 30 I:15 - 1:30 329 34! 670 !:30 - !'45 !5 1S 31 1:30 1:45 4 OD !0 - 302 304 !: £ - 2: 54 !4 51 24 105 1:45 - 2:00 252 1218 291 !252 543 2470 2:60 -. 2:!5 13 4 17 2:00 - 2:I5 29~ " 279 575 2:!5 - 2:30 15 9 24 2:15 - 2:30 342 295 638 2:33 - 2:45 !0 8 · 18 2:30- 2:45 375 306 832 2:45 - 3:00 6 44 4 25 10 ~ 2:45 - 3:00 350 1374 278 !159 638 ~533 3:00 - 3:15 10 2 13 3:00- 3:15 393 294 S87 3:!5 - 3:30. 15 10 25 3:15 - 3:30 400 284 ~4 3:30 - 3:4~ 4. 14 i8 3:30 - 3:45 462 328 7SO ~:4~ - 4:00 8 3~ IE 43 24 81 3:45 - 4:00 478 1733 307 !213 785 2~45 4:0,2 - 4:!5 !0 5 !5 4:00 - 4:15 508 310 8!8 4:!5 - 4:33 5 16 2I 4:I5 - 4:30 536 325 912 4:3fi - 4:45 i2 32 44 4:30 - 4:~5 E~ 310 939 4:~5 - 5!00 18 45 4~ 99 64 144 4:45 - 5:00 S78 240i 384 !330 I052 3731 5:!5 - 5:30 34 EO ' 114 · 5:15 - 5:30 EJ2 410 1!02 5:30 - 5:45 52 !4~ 195 5:30 - 5:45 .642 37! !013 5:45 - 8:00 82 18~. 16~ 488 248 6.55 5:45 - 8:00 890 2740 369 1508 1059 ~:O¢ - 8:!~' 94 '195 2F.3 6:00 - 8:!5 742 302 1044 . E:!~ - 5:30 !14 278 .39Z 6:15 - 6:30 559 302 ~51 ~:20 ' E:45 !4~ 428 E74 ~:30 - 6:45 350 257 ~47 ~:4~ - 7;00 !8~ ~0 E2fl 1529 a14 2o~ 6:45 - 7:00 355 2026 219 lO~O 574 3126 -.a.~ :15 235 · ~.;. - 7 518 851 7:00 7:15 224 155 4BO 7:!E - 7:30 242 758 lOOO 7:I5 - 7:30 240 I50 390 7:30 - 7:45 '259 928 1178 7:30 - 7:45 2!5 !5! 353 7:z~ - ~:~¢ 244 97! ~30 3230 1!74 4201 7:45.- 8:00 174 958 154 51i 32~ 1557 8-~ - 8:i~ 239 957 I1~8 8:00 - 8:15. 128 120 24~ 8:!5 - 8:30 272 851 1123 8:15 - 8:30 154 118 272 $:~G - ~:45 ~58 780 !018 8:30 - 8:4~ I34 121 255 ~:45 - $:0G 23~ 1007 574 3142 812 4149 8:45 - 9:00 124 540 !18 477 24~ !017 ~:00 - ~:15 2!E 512 727 9:00 - 9:!5 !42 105 247 ~:!~ - S:39 200 392 5SZ 9:!5 - 9:30 90 104 194 ~:29 - 9:45 12~ 295 478 9:30 - 9:45 94 132 ~:~5 - !0400 222 819 258 !458 4~0 2277 9:45 - !O:O0 115 44!' 85 3~6 ~O0 ~37 !0:~0 - 10:!5 209 250 4fl9 10:~0 - 10:!5 !!~ 94 ~!0 !0:!5 - !0:30 2!2 238 448 10:!5 - 10:30 84 52 !4~ !0:2C - !0:45 225 259 457 10:30 - !0:45 82 52 !34 10:~5 - !!;OO 232 631 266 1021 498 !902 10:45 -.I1:00 72 354 ~0 258 l~2 1!:00 - !1:!5 250 248 498 1!:00 - 1!:15 60 50 !lO !!:!5 -.!1:30 270 262 532 1!:15 - 11:30 49 32 81 !!:30 - 11:45 2flO 294 574 !1:30 - 11:45 40 39 1!:4£ ~ 12:00 79 289 !088 293 1097 58I 2185 11:45 - 12:00 30 179' 30 151 EO 330 ~O~ALS 5 7~2 ~ Z27 17,9~9 ~ 248 10.87~ 26.!24. Ant.S · . . . ~_.... ~' 21.00~ 23.105 O$'~6zgT., · · TUE 12'02 F.4_~ 71~7345991 TL'STIN PUBLIC g0RKS,"E.XG ~j. 004 T'~FFIC DATA SERVICES. INC. . LOCATION CDDE 10507.014 LO~TIO~ - ~tV~ ' AUE~GEO VOLU~ES FO~ - T~L~SDAY 10/2~195 TO F~IDAY 10/25/95 TIME E~ ~ TOT~ TIM~ ES ~ TOTAL i2:00 - 1~:15 23 12 35 12:00 - 12:!S 146 1!4 12:15 - ~Z:33 IS 6 21 12:15 - 12:30 !18 118 236 12:30 - 12:45 14 S 19. 12:30 - 12:45 130 146 275 12:45 - !:OO. 6 58 I0 33 16 91 12:45 - 1:00 130 524 132 510 2~2 1034 l:O0 - 1:15 5 2 Z 1:00 - i:15 125 155 290 1:!5 - 1:30 4 4 B 1:15 - 1:30 105 132 237 I:39 - 1:45 7 10 17 1':30 - 1:45 9B 109 205 1:45 - 2:00 I0 2~ 8 24 lB 50 !:45 - 2:00 1!2 438 132 538 244 · 976 2:00 - 2:1~ ~ 3 9 2:00 - 2:!5 I22 !30 252 ii ..~ 235 2:!S - 2:20 2 ~ 5 2:15- 2:30 ..7 2:30 - 2:4S 4 3 7 2:30 - 2:45 1S4 124 278 2:41 - 2:00 1 !3 3 !2 4 25 2:45 - 3:00 125 5!9 1BE 53~ 292 1057 3:00 - 3:!5 I' ~ g 3:00 - 3:15 132 13B 258 3:15 - 3:33 4 4 8 3:15 - 3:30 I30 155 285 - 4 3:30 2:5 6 2 8 3:30- 3:45 !~4 205 3:~5 - 4:00 4 1S 4 18 8 33 3:45 - 4:00 !70 555 lDO 6~7 250 !273 4:00 - 4:15 2 4 6 4:00 - 4:!5 164 150 314 4:15 - 4:20 B 7 13 4:15 - 4:30 168 150 ~18 4:30 - 4:45 13 . 25 3~ 4:30 - 4:45 252 170 422 4:4~ - 5:00 !7 3~ !9 55 36 93 4:45 - 5:00 2~4 848 12~ 599 393 !447 5:0~ - 5:~5 2~ 20 49 ~:00- 5:!5 324 172 496 5:!5 - 5:30 40 2~ e B9 5:i5- 5:30 352 I74 526 '5:30 - 5:45 ' 72 42 1!4 5:30- 5:45 409 137 545 5:45 - ~:O0 62 203 54 145 116 3~8 5:45 - B:O0 375 I460 13S 622 514 20B2 6:00 - 5:15 7~ 5~ 145 6:00 - 6:15 270 162 432 6:!5 - 6:30 I~ I!! 259 6:15- 6:30 297 ..0 257 6:30 - 6:45 15B !~2 340 E:30- E:/S 1BO 114 294 . ~:45 - 7:00 I78 5Ei !78 539 35B 1100 6:45 - 7:00 iSE ~!E 128 554 28B 135~ 7:00 - 7:!5 !35 255 491 7:00 - 7:!~ !25 I05 242 7:!5 - 7.=n 12~ ._2 450 7:15 - 7:30 ~!B 95 2!3 7:30 - 7'45 120 377 497 7:30 - 7:45 1!~ 78 1~4 7:45 - 8:90 ~8 ~52 3~7 13El 485 i~33 7:45 - 8:00 102 472 5~ 335 i5~ BO7 8:00 - 8:15 1~3 ~52 455 8:00 - E:15 95 49 i45 8:15 - 8:30 10~ 209 417 8:15 - 8:30 ~8 58 15~ 8:20 - 8:45 116 23~ 354 'B:30 - E:45 . 104 4S 153 - .5. 20~ 1107 32S ~61 8:4S - 9:00 7B 374 ~B 202 122 576 8:45 ~:00 1!7 ' ' -- 9:00 - 9:15 10! 15~ 259 g:O0 - ~:15 82 48 1S0 9:!5 - ~:30 100 121 22! 9:15 ~ 9:30 67 54 12! ~:30 - 9:~5 c= !35 234 ~:30 ' 9:45 75 ~0 I!6 9:'5~ - lO:OO ~0 3~9 !3E 547 222 ~q'--= o.:a5 - 10:00 =~ 2~5 42 !S4 ~0q. . 470 !D:O0- !0:!5 77 !03 ,~n..~ 10:00 - 10:!5 79 5B 10:!5 - !0:30 6~ !02 i68 !0:16 - !0:30 57 3E i0:30 - 10:~5 BE !!4 200 10:30 - I0:C5 4! 25 lO:ZE - Ii:00 ~ 315 95 4!4 18I 729 i0:4~ - Ii:00 2~ 202 37 156 ~S 358 11:09 - 11:15 92 E2 !90 ll:O0 - 1!:15 31 2B 57 11:15 - 1!:30 1~5 102 Z27 !!:15 ' 1!:30 27 26 11:20 - 11:45 ~30 !!9 249 !1:30 - 11:45 7~ 16 42 I1:~5.- 12:00 159 506 94 413 253 9!9 1I:~5 - !2:00 lB 102 !5 83 ~3 !85 TOTALS 3.GBO 4,65~ 7, F18 B,G26 . 5,008 1!,G34 ADT'~ . ' . 9,686 .... 05/26/97 · /I.'E 12'02 F.~ 7147345991 /-USTIN PI~LIC WORKS,'ENG 005 TI~E ~= W~ TOTAL TiME E~ ~ TOTAL 12:00 - 12:15 7 11 18 12:09 - 12:!5 114 9~ 206 !~:I5 - !2:30 B I2 !B 12:!5 - 12:30 1!2 94 206~ 12:~0 - 12:45 8 5 !3 1~:30 - 12:45 94 ]08 202 I2:45 - 1-09 6 27 4 32 I0 59 12:45 - 1:00 lOS' 425 122 418 278 847 I:00 - 1'15 3 E 9 1:09 - 1:15 92 113 205 1:15 - 1:30 5 3 8 !:!5 - 1:20 80 !11 191 1:30 - 1:45 1 3 4 1:30 - 1:45 95 104 207 i:45 - 2:00 3 !2 5 !7 8 29 1:45 o 2:00 95 3~E 102 4~0 198 2:00 - 2:I5 3 4 7 2:90 - 2:!5 83 105 189 2:I5 - 2:30 2 0 2 2:!5 - 2:30 94 95 190 2:30 - 2:45 2 2 4 2:20 - 2:45 130 112 242 2:4~ - 3:00 4 11 ! 7 5 i8 2:~ - 3:00 115 422 !$I 475 276 3:00 - 3:15 3 S '9 3:00 - 3:15 124 lOS 230 3:15 - 3:30 : 2 8 3:!5 - 3:30 124 108 222 3:30 - 3:45 E 0 B 3:39 - 3:45 !26 152 299 3:45 - 4:09 ~ 2! ~ 12 10 33 3:45 - 4:00 !ZO 524 I7S 554 318 '4:00 - 4:15 ~ ' I 7. 4:00 - 4:!5 159 !74 333 4:15 - 4:30 7 6 13 4:15 - 4:~0 145 !$1 305 4:S0 - 4:4~ !G 21 37 4:30 - 4:45 290 158 388 4:45 - 5:00 !3 4~ !7 45 30 . 87 4:45 - 5:90 294 258 !~0 573 414 S:O0 - 5:15 34 !$' 50 5:90 - 5:15 304 174 475 5:i5 - E:30 48 '12 'e 6! 5:!~ - 5:30 322 2~8 551 5:30 - ~:45 52 '24 112 5:39 - 5:45 2~2 !78 450 5:45 - ~:O0 72 242 42 95 114 337 5:45 -. 6:00 216 1!25 !89 7S9 405 ~:00 - 8:15 ~0 4E 125 ~:00 - $:!5 179 . 120 309 E:!E - 8:20 120 82 202 a:!S - S:20 155 139 297 ~:30 - 5:45 1!5 !4~ 2~ E:~O - B:45 !23 ~2 2!5 E:45 - 7:00 .~7 442 .. 444 -. 8~5 B:45 - 7:00 !!0 570 77 438 !~7 7:00 - 7:!5 !!2 222 334 7:15 - 7:30 ~ 292 383 7:15 ;:30 75 52 13~ 7:~0 - 7:45 131 35~ 457 7:30- 7:~5 ~2 ~4 10~ 7:45 - 8:00 !2~ 451 425 !305 548 !757 7:45- B:OO 57 ~!1 49. 229 1!2 £:09 - 8:!5 115. 310 425 ~:00 - 8:15 49 8:!~ - 8:30 78 307 3~5 ' ~:!5 - 8:30 5! 35 $7 ~:30 - 5:45 95 209 305 $:20 - 5:45 53 33 ~:45 - S:OO 97 387 !~ 994 2~5 !381 S:45 - 9:00 42 !~5 30 !77 72 9:00 - 9;15 82 122 2!4 9:00 - 9:15 30 42 72 9:15 - 9:30 !~ !05 - 192 9:15 - 9:20 3! 29 50 9:20 - 9:45 ~ !13 19i 9:30 - 9:45 44 35 79 9:45 - i0:00 57 303 8~ 429 14£ 742 ~:45 - !0:O0 28 !33 17 1~3 45 lO:OO - !0:!5 49 ~0 !!9 !0:00 - !0:!5 33 37 70 i0:~5 ~ -: - .O..O $5 72 !28 I0:!5 - !0:30 25 20 45 !0:20 - 10:45 57 82 I~9 !9:30 - !0:45 25 19 44, !0:45 - 1!:00 ~I 222 62 292 129 ~!5 !0:45 - I!:00 20 103 19 ~5 39 II:gO - !!:1£ ~O 78 !Fi 1!:00 - !1:15 !9 22 4I. !1:!5 - !I:30 87 71 !55 1i:!5 - 11:30 !3 26 !!:30 - 11:45 !DO ~2 152 !!:30 - I!:45 13 20 32 796 897 !078 !411 !~94 !006 540 !95 1!':45 - !2:00 !09 38~ 75 317 18S 703 ll:4S - I2:00 5 51 ic 85 21 ~5 TOTALS 100. Jamboree & Edinger Existing count iR PK HOUR LANES -CAPACITY VOL V/C NBL 2 3400 52 .02* lqBT 3 5100 473 .09 FBR 1 1700 18 .01 PM PI[ HOUR yon v/c 168 .05 2199 .43* 153 .09 SBL 2 3400 113 .03 234 .07* SBT 3 5100 2448 .48* 933 .18 SBR 1 1700 618 .36 219 .13 EBL 2 3400 122 .04* BT 2 3400 312 .09 EBR 1 1700 108 .06 608 .18' · . 903 .27 66 .04 ~-BL 2 3400 451 .13 77 .02 ~'BT 3 5100 1115 .i2' 565 .11' ~R 1 17~0 247 .15 172 .10 Clearance Interval .05* .05* TOTAL CAPACITY UTiLIZATIO]{ .81 .84 ITAM- Short-Range w/Project iR P£ HOUR L~ES CAPACITY VOL V/C P}{ PK HOUR VOL V/C ]{BL 2 3400 10 .00 450 .13 }CBT 3 5100 440 .09 2870 .56* tP3R 1 1700 10 .01 60 .04 SBL 2 3400 60 .02 180 .05* SBT 3 ' 5100 2460 .48* 890 .17 SBR 1 1700 360. .21 160 .09 EBL 2 3400 170 .05* 150 .04 EBT 3 5100 700 .14 2350 .46* EBR 1 1700 70 .04 50 .03 W~L 2 3400 440 .13 10 .(30 WBT 3 5100 . 2910 .57* 700 .14 W]3R 1 1700 280 .16 60 .04 Clearance Interval .05* .05* TOTE CAPACI~ UTILIZtTION 1.15 1.12 FrAM- Short-Range w/o project IR PK HOUR LINES O_PICITY VOL V/C PH PK HC~IR VOL V/C ]~BL 2 3400 20 .01' 370 .11 MBT 3 5100 460 .09 2930 .57* MBR 1 1700 10 .01 40 .02 SBL 2 3400 70 .02 130 .04* SBT 3 5100 2520 .49* 9~0 .19 SBR 1 1700 400 .24 170 .10 2 3400 160 .05* 120 .04 3 5100 700 .14 2090 .41' 1 1700 70 .04 60 .04 EBL EBT EBR WBL 2 3400 400 .12 10 .00 ~BT 3 5100- 2940 .58* 710 .14 WBR 1 1700 280 .16 60" .04 Clearance Interval .05* .05* Y~rfAL CAPACI~ UTILIL~TION 1.18 1.07 rr~M- Long-Range w/o Project IR PK HOUR LA2fES C_LPACITY VOL V/C PR P£' HOUR VOL V/C I{BL 1 1700 40 .02 90 .05 MBT · - 0 0 0 0 ~R 1 1700 10 .01 '10 .01 SBL 2 3400 550 .16' 660 .19' SBT 0 0 0 0 SBR 1 1700 420 .25 530 .31 EBL 2 3400 330 .10' 510 .15' EBT 3 5100 1930 .38 2380 .47 EBR 1 1700 '160 .09 100 .06 W'BL 2 3400 10 .00 10 .00 ~TBT 3 5100 2710 .53* 2000 .39* W~R 1 1700 270 .16 260 .15 Right Turn Adjustment SBR .03* SBR .06* Clearance Interval .05* .05* CAPACITY UTILIZATION .87 .84 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Count Date: tva Location: City of Tus§n North-South Str Jamboree Plaza Entrance East-West Stree Edin~r Avenue KHR Code: CPE~JP1.XLS Input By: C. Brockman County: Oran~ Peak Hour:. n/a. Comments: 1991 Estimate Plus 24 Percent Increase Based Upon P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation Increase Peak Hour Volume Volume./Capacit7 Ratio Number Capacity Existing Existing Lane of (Veh/Hr)) Plus Plus Movement Lanes On Green Pmiect Proiect Left Turn 0 1500 0 0.000 Through 0 1500 0 0.000 Right Turn 0 100 0 0.000 Left Turn 1 3000 241 0.080 Through · 0 1500 0 0.000 Right Turn 1 3000 81 0.027 Left Turn 1 3000 154 0.051 Through 2 3200 1757 0.549 Right Turn 0 1500 0 0.000 Left Turn 0 1500 '0 0.000 Through · 2 3200 1070 0.334 Right Turn 1 1500 51 0.034 ICU 0.629 Level of Service s Direction of Travel N~und Southbound Eastbound Westbound Denoles Critical Movement Denotes Shared Lane KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Count Date: n/a Location: Cit7 of Tusl~n North-South Str Jamboree Road East-West Stree Edin~r Avenue KHR Code: CPE-JP2.XLS Input By: C. Brockman CountY: Oran~ _ Peak Hour: n/a Comments: ExistJn~l Plus Pmiect CondilJons - P.M. Peak Hour Conditions Di'ec§on of Travel N='b~und Southbound Eastbound Peak Hour Volume t Volume/Capacity P,a~o Number Capacity ~ Existing I Ex J,sting ~Veh/Hrl) ' . Plus I ~qus. j Lane of 0% Green _ Proiec~t Movement Lanes ~oo ~ I u_'~] I Ri~lht Turn 1 ~o.~· ~ ~,oo ~ I ~Tum ~ ' ~?oo 24s j~ u..~ I Left Turn 2 3400 ' 7O4 ~o~ ~. ~o0 , ~0~' ,~00 ~0 ', I;'~; .I ' LeffTum 2 _ ~ ~ ~700 ~7~ Westbound ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 Level of Service Denotes Critical Movement Denotes Shared Lane .. o KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Count Date: · Na Location: City of Tustin North-South StrE Jamboree Road East-West Stree' Edinger Avenue KHR Code: CPE-JP3.XLS Input By: C. Brockman County: Orange Peak Hour: n/a .. Comments: Future Long-Range Plus Project CondilJons - P.M. Peak Hour CondilJons Direction of Travel Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity RalJo Number Capacity Existing Existing Lane of (Veh/Hr)) Plus Plus Movement Lanes On Green Project Project Left Turn 1 1700 90 0.053 * Through 0 1700 0 0.000 · Right Turn 1 1700 10 0.006 Left Turn 2 3400 660 0.194 * Through 0 1700 0 0.000 Right Turn 1 1700 556 0.327 Left Turn 2 3400 606 0.178 Through 3 5100 2501 0.490 , Right Turn 1 1700 124 0.073 Left Turn 2 3400 10 0.003 Through ,3 5100 2025 0.397 . · Right Turn 1 1700 260 0.153 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.872 Level of Service' D Denotes Critical Movement Denotes Shared Lane ATTACHMENT D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3556 !0 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 3556 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE. CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 LOCATED IN JAMBOREE PLAZA ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JAMBOREE ROAD AND EDINGER AVENUE. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I , The Planning Commissi. on finds and determines as follows: A, That Tentative Parcel Map 97-164 was submitted to the Planning Commission- by California Pacific Equities for consideration; Ce That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and' held for said map on October 27, 1997 by the Planning Commission; That the Tiered Negative Declaration for the Jamboree Plaza. District Regulations, has been certified in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the subject project; D . E . That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and Subdivision Map Act as it Pertains to the development of commercial and industrial properties; That the impacts associated with this approval on School District facilities are adequately addressed; F , That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; G. H, I . That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to-cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure' fish or wildlife in their habitat; That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements proposed 'will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, for access through or use of the .property within' the proposed subdivision; 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolutior Page 2 3556 J. That the design-of the subdivision or the types of improvements proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems; K. That the proposed project has been reviewed for conformity with the provisions of the Orange County Congestion-Management Program, and it has been determined that the additional traffic generated by the proposed project onto the CMP Highway System does not. cause the system to exceed established level of service standards (ELS); and, n. That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-Element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be . consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-Element. 'II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Tentative.Parcel Map No. 97-164 located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regUlar meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 27th. day o~. .Chairm~/ ~LIZABETH A.'BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3556 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 27th day of October, 1997. ELIZABETH A. ~INSACK Planning Commission Secretary. EXHIBIT A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 RESOLUTION NO. 3556 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 Within 24 months from tentative map approval, the Subdivider shall record with appropriate agencies, a final map prepared in accordance with subdivision requi'rements of the Tustin Municipal Code, the State Subdivision Map.Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 9361.D of the Tustin Municipal Code. (1) 1.2' Prior to.release of building permits, all conditions 6f approval of Design Review 97-016 for the subject project shall be complied with as shown 6n Exhibit A attached to Resolution No. 3557 and'incorporated herein by reference. (1) 1'3 The subdivider shall conform to all applicable requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, in the Jamboree· Plaza District Regulations, and in the Negative Declaration Certified for this project'. ' (1) 1.4 Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall submit: A current title report; and, A duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8~" X 11" 'transparency of each map sheet prior to final map approval and "as built" grading, landscape and improvement plans prior to Certificate of Acceptance. 1.5 The aPplicant shall hold harmless an~ defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out 6f a' challenge of the City's approval of this project. PUBLIC/PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS (1) 2.1 Prior to recordation of a final map, the Subdivider'shall (2) prepare plans for and construct or post security (3) guaranteeing construction of'all public and/or private, (6) infrastructure improvements within the boundary of said tract map in conformance with applicable City standards, including but not limited to the following: SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7) PC/CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW * * * EXCEPTION Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 2 a. C . D. E. F. Curb and gutter Sidewalks, including curb ramps for the Physically disabled Drive aprons All signing/striping modifications Street paving Street lights Catch basins/storm drain .laterals/connection to existing storm drain system. In addition, a 24"'X 36" reproducible construction'area traffic control plan, as prepared by a' California Registered Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer experienced in this type of plan preparation, will be required. (1) 2.2 The amount of acceptable security for construction of (5) public improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works -DePartment. The amount and acceptable security for private improvements shall-be reviewed and approved by the Building official. (1) 2.3 Ail' changes 'in existing curbs, gutters, sidewalks (5) and other public improvements shall be the responsibility of subdivider. (1) 2.4 Preparation of plans for and construction of: (2) (5) A. All sanitary sewer facilities must be submitted as required by the City Engineer' and- local sewering agency. These facilities shall include a gravity flow system per standards of the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. B . A domestic water system must be designed and installed to the 'standards of the Irvine Ranch Water District. Improvement plans shall also be reviewed and approved by the Orange County Fire Authority for fire -protection. purposes. The~ adequacy and reliability of'water, system design and the distribution Of fire hydrants will be evaluated. The water distribution sYstem and appurtenances shall also conform to the applicable laws and adopted regulations enforced by,the Orange County Health Department. Any required reclaimed water systems shall meet the standards as required by the Irvine Ranch Water District. (1) 2.5 Existing sewer, domestic water, reclaimed water and storm drain service laterals shall be utilized. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 3 (5) 2.6 In addition to the normal- full size plan submittal process, all final development plans including, but not limited to: tract maps, parcel maps, right-of-way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans are also required ~o be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD).format. The acceptable formats shall be Integraph DGN or AutoCad DWG file format, but in no case less than DXF file format. The City of Tustin CADD conventions shall be followed in preparing plans in CADD, and -these guidelines are available from the Engineering Division. The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are approved, and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be submitted once all construction has been completed. The "as built'" CADD files will be required prior to release of the subdivision bonds. (5) 2.7 The Subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of the Notice of Intent for the NPDES construction permit, as submitted to the State of California Water Resources COntrol Board (one copy to Community Development Department/Building Division and one to the Public Works Department/ Engineering Division). (5) 2.8 The proposed storm drain connection to the Santa Ana- Santa Fe F-10 Flood Control Channel will require a permit from the Orange County Flood Control District. DEDICATIONS/RESERVATIONS/EASeMENTS (1) 3.1 The subdivider shall satisfy dedication and/or (2) reServation requirements as applicable, including but not (5) limited to dedication, of all required street and flood control right-of-way easements, vehicular access rights, sewer easements and water easements defined and approved as to specific location by the City Engineer and 'other agencies. (1) 3.2 Landscape maintenance shall be the responsibility of the (5)~ Jamboree Plaza Property Owners' Association. The City of Tustin will not be responsible for maintenance of private streets, storm drains, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, slopes or perimeter walls. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 .~ Resolution No. 3556 Page 4 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ADJACENT TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (1) 4.1. Prior to recordation of the final map, subdivider shall (2) post with the Community Development Department a minimum (5) $2,500 cash deposit or letter of credit to guarantee the sweeping of streets and clean-up of streets affected by construction activities. In the event this 'deposit is depleted prior to completion of development or City appearance of'public streets, an additional incremental deposit will be required. (1) 4.2 Any damage done to existing street improvements and (5) utilities 'shall be repaired before acceptance of the tract and/or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development on any parcel within the subdivision. (1) 4.3 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Encroachment Permit must be obtained from and applicable fees paid to the Public Works Department. GRADING (1) 5.1 Prior to issuance of grading permits: (2) (5) .A. A detailed soils engineering report shall be submitted to and aPproved by the Building Official conforming to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, .City grading requirements, and all other applicable state and local, laws, regulations and requirements. B . The applicant shall submit a grading plan subject to approval by the Department of Community Development delineating the following information: I · Methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards· · Recommendations" submitted and approVed. by a geotechnical or soils engineer. . Compliance with conceptual grading shown on tentative tract map. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 5 · · . , . A drainage plan and necessary support documents, such as hydrology calculations, to comply with the following requirements: a . be Provision of drainage facilities to remove any flood hazard to the satisfaction of the City Engineer which will allow building pads to be safe from inundation from rainfall..which may be expected from all- storms up to and inClUding the theoretical 100/500 year storm and dedication of tany necessary easements on the final map as required. Elimination of any sheet flow' and ponding. C · Provision of drainage facilities to protect the lots from any high velocity scouring action. d· Provision. for tributary drainage from adjoining properties. Ail flood hazard areas of.record. Final s~reet elevations at key locations. Both horizontal and vertical, intersection sight lines shall be shown on the landscape plan in compliance with OCEMA Standard No. 1117 for the interior streets. All landscaping within the limited use areas shall comply with OCEMA Standard No. 1117. Final pad/finished floor elevations and key elevation for all site grading. Ail pad elevations to be a minimum of 1..0 foot above base flood elevation as defined by' FEMA. A note shall be placed on the grading plan requiring Community Development Department approval of rough grading prior to final clearance for foundations. The Department will inspect the site for accuracy of elevations, slope gradients, etc. and may require certification of any grading related matter. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 6 10. A note shall be placed on the plans 'that a qualified paleontologist~archaeologist, as appropriate shall be present during rough grading operations. .If resources are found, they shall~be excavated or preserved as deemed appropriate or as recommended by the paleontologist/ archaeologist subject to review and approval by the Departments of Public Works and Community Development. Ail "finds" shall be reported immediately to the Department of Community Development. The paleontologist/ archaeologist shall attend the pregrade construction meeting to ensure that this condition and necessary procedures in the event of a "find" are explained. Co The applicant shall prepare a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all construCtion work related to the subject tract including a method of control to prevent dust and windblown earth problems. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. D. Submittal of a construction traffic routing plan for review and approval by the Director of Public Works. E , The applicant shall prepare a hydrology and hydraulic calculations for this subject property. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Community Development Department/Building Division. (1) 5.2 Ail earthwork shall be performed'in accordance with the (3) Tustin City Code and Tustin Grading Manual. (1) 5.3 Prior to the recordation of a final map, the applicant (5) shall submit for approval by the-Community Development and Public Works. Departments, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that identifies the application and incorporation of those routine structural and non- structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) and detailing implementation of the BMPs not dependent on specific land uses. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 7 (1) 5.4 Prior to issuance of grading, grubbing and~clearing. Or (5) paving permits, the applicant shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Storm water Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained shall be submitted to the Building~Official. (1) 5.5 Applicant shall submit a 'construction Phasing Schedule. Construction phasing shall occur in a logical and sequential, pattern and as identified on 'the approved phasing schedule. The Community Development Director may make minor modifications to the phasing schedule provided 'that such modifications result in orderly and sequential development, minimizing construction impacts to the greatest extent possible on the occupied portion of the development. FIRE AUTHORITY (5) 6.1 Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all structures to be built on lots shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system, in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. (5) 6.2 Prior to the approval of any use/site permits for site planning, issuance of any grading permits, or building permits, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to the Fire Chief a list.of the quantities of all hazardous, flammable and combustible materials, liquids or gases. These liquids and materials are. to be classified according to the "Orange County Fire Authority Chemical classification Handout". The submittal shall provide a summary sheet listing each hazard class, the total quantity of chemicals stored per class and the total quantity of chemicals used in that class. All forms of materials are to be converted to 'units of measure in pounds, gallons and cubic'feet. (5) 6.3 Prior to approval of a site development/use permit, or the issuance' of a building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Chief. The applicant shall include information on the plans required by the Fire Chief. Contact the Orange County Fire Authority Plans Review Section for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed'on the plans. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 8 (5) 6.4 Prior to'recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit water improvement plans to the Fire Chief for review and approval to ensure adequate fire protection and financial security is ~posted for the installation. The water system design, location of valves, and thedistribution of the fire hydrants will be evaluated and approved by the Fire Chief. (5) 6.5 Prior to the recordation of any subdivision map or the issuance of any building permits, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit to the Fire Chief evidence of the on-site fire hydrant system and indicate whether it is public or private. If the system is.private, the system shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief prior to the isSuance of building permits. Provisions shall be made by the applicant for the repair and maintenance of the system, in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. (5) 6.6 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall Submit and obtain approval of preliminary plans for all streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire Chief in consultation with the Manager, Traffic Engineering. The' plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when other conditions require it. (5) 6.7 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant.shall submit and obtain approval from the Fire Chief for street improvement plans.with fire lanes shown. The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage with the height, stroke and color of lettering and the contrasting background color shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Chief. (5) 6.8 Prior to issuance of the certificate of use and occupancy the approved fire lane making plan shall be installed. The CC&R's shall contain a fire lane map and provisions which prohibit parking in the fire lanes. A method of enforcement shall be included. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 9 (5) 6.9 Prior to the issuance of any building permits for combustible construction,~ the developer shall submit and obtain the Fire Chief's approval of a letter and plan stating that water for fire fighting purposes and an all weather fire access road shall be in place and operational as required by the Uniform Fire Code before any combustible materials are placed on the site. (5) 6.~10 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an ©range County Fire Authority Water Availability Form shall be submitted to and approved by the Plan Review Section of the Orange County Fire Authority.~ If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system shall be installed in · each structure, in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. (5) 6.11 Prior to the issuance of building permits plans for the automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. This system shall be operational prior to the.issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy. (5) 6.12 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building to the Fire Chief for review and approval.' (5) 6.13 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall contact the Orange County Fire Authority Hazardous Materials Disclosure Office to obtain a "Hazardous Materials Business Information and Chemical Inventory Packet". This shall be completed and submitted to the Fire Chief before~ the. issuance of any building permits. (5) 6.14 Prior to the issuance of any certificates of use and occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a "Blue Reflective Pavement Marker" indicating its location on the street or drive per the Orange County Fire Authority Standard and approved by the Fire Chief. On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 10 FEES, (1) 7.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall (6) be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are ·subject to change. a . Building plan check and permit-fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current-schedule. b · Orange County Fire Authority plan check and inspection fees to the Community .Development Department based upon the most current schedule. lc. New development fees in the amount of $.10 per .square foot of ' floor area to the Community Development Department. d. Transportation System Improvement PrOgram, Benefit Area "B" fees in. the amount of $3.31 per square foot of new or added gross floor area of construction or improvements to the Community Development Department. e · Major thoroughfare and bridge fees in the amount of $2.96 per square foot of building area to the Tustin Public Works Department. f o School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to any agreement reached and executed between the District and the applicant. Water connection fees to the Irvine. Ranch Water District. h. Sewer connection fees to the Orange County Sanitation District. (5) 7.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty-eight dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any Exhibit A TPM 97-164 Resolution No. 3556 Page 11 interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. 'In addition, should the Department of Fish and .Game reject the Certificate of Fee Exemption filed with the Notice of Determination and require paYment of fees, the applicaht shall deliver to the Community Development Department, within forty-eight (48).. hours of notification, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $1,250 (one thousand two hundred fifty, dollars) pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4. If this fee is imposed,'the subject project shall not be operative, vested or final unless and until the fee is paid. ATTACHMENT E ORDINANCE NO. 1191; RESOLUTION NOS. 97-108 AND 97-109 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1191 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AN ORDINANCE'OF THE CITY CouNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 97-002 TO AMENDSECTION 2.0 AND EXHIBIT 1 OF THE JAMBOREE PLAZA DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO MODIFY THE PLANNING AREA BOuNDARIES WITHIN THE JAMBOREE PLAZA DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EDINGER AVENUE AND JAMBOREE ROAD. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: I , The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. That an application has been filed by California Pacific Equities, requesting approval of Zone Change 97-002 to amend Section 2.0 and Exhibit 1 of the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations to modify the Planning Area Boundaries within the Jamboree Plaza development. B o That a Public Hearing was duly noticed, called and held on said application by the Planning Commission on October 27, 1997, and by the City Council on November 3, 1997. C . m~ That the Tiered Negative Declaration for the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations has been certified in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the subject project. Proposed Zone Change 97-002 is Consistent with the policies of the General Plan Land Use Element, including Policy 6.8, to create an "office park" or "campus-like" environment for industrial and business park developments. II. The applicant shall pay City's defense costs (including attorneys' fees) and indemnify and hold City harmless from and against any claims, losses, liabilities or damages assessed or awarded ~against City by way of judgement, settlement or stipulation (including awards for costs, attorneys' fees, and expert witness fees), ~arising from actions filed against the City challenging the City's approval of Zone Change 97-002. 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ordinance No. 119~ Page 2 III. The City Council hereby approves Zone Change 97-002 as follows: a. Section 2.0 of the' Jamboree Plaza District Regulations shall be changed to read as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto. B . Exhibit 1 of the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations shall be revised as shown in Exhibit B, attached 'hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 17th day of November, 1997. JEFFERY M. THOMAS Mayor PAMELA STOKER City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1191 PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole' number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1191 was duly and regularly introduced at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 3rd day of November, 1997 and passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 17th day of November, 1997. COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1191 EXHIBIT A AMENDMENTS TO JAMBOREE PLAZA DISTRICT REGULATIONS 2.0 STATISTICAL SUMMARY/LAND USE DESIGNATIONS There are four (4) separate land use categories provided within the Jamboree Plaza Planned Community. Land use designations are shown on Exhibit 1 with a statistical summary of each planning area as follows: PLANNING AREA TOTAL AUTHORIZED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE A 1.9 20,000 z., . -, ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::: 23,200 I : 1 ! ! I . 11111111 I ...~. EXHIBIT B -. ORDINANCE NO' 11'91. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 97-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE cITY OF TUSTIN FINDING THAT THE TIERED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE JAMBOREE PLAZA DISTRICT REGULATIONS IS ADEQUATE FOR ZONE CHANGE 97-002, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 AND DESIGN REVIEW 97- 016. APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I . The City Council finds and determines as follows: a. That Zone Change 97-002, Tentative Parcel Map 97- 164 and Design Review 97-016 and respective development plans are considered "projects" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, B o That the projects are covered by a previously certified Negative Declaration for the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations which serves as the basis for a Tiered Negative Declaration for the proposed project. II. The Jamboree Plaza District Regulations Negative Declaration, previously certified on June 3, 1991, was considered prior to approval of this project. The City Council hereby finds: that this project is similar in scope to the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations previously approved; the effects of this project, relating to grading, drainage, circulation, public services and utilities, were examined in the both the June 1991 Negative Declaration and the Tiered Negative Declaration. The applicable mitigation measures and alternatives developed in the June 1991 Negative Declaration and the Tiered Negative Declaration are incorporated into this project. The Tiered Negative Declaration based on the previously certified Jamboree Plaza District Regulations Negative Declaration is, therefore, determined to be adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this project and satisfies all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26¸ 27 28 Resolution No. 97-108 Page 2 Further, the City Council finds the project' involves no pQtential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources; and, therefore, makes a De Minimis Impact Finding related to Fish and Game Code Section 711.4. Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Tiered Negative Declaration have been incorporated into this project which mitigate potential significant environmental effects thereof. The mitigation measures are identified as Conditions on Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556 r~commending approval of Tentative Parcel Map 97-164 and Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3557 approving Design Review 97-014. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of November, 1997. JEFFERY'M. THOMAS MAYOR Pamela Stoker City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) SS CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 97-108 PAMELA.STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio' Clerk of the CitY council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 97-108 was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted at 'a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council; held on the 3rd day of November, 1997. COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERABSENT: · PAMELA STOKER City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 97-109 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION 'OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 97-164 LOCATED IN JAMBOREE PLAZA ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JAMBOREE ROAD AND EDINGER AVENUE. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The City Council finds and determines as follows: a. That Tentative Parcel Map 97-164 was submitted to the City Council by California Pacific Equities for consideration;. B · That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said map on October 27, 1997 by the Planning Commission and on November 3, 1997 by the City Council; C . That the Tiered Negative Declaration for the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations ,. has been certified in conformance with the requirements of the California Environmental 'Quality Act for the subject project; D . That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin Area General Plan and Subdivision Map Act as it pertains to the development of commercial and industrial properties; E , The impacts associated with this approval on School District facilities are adequately addressed. F . That the site is physically suitable for the 'type of development proposed; G. That .the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; H. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat; I · J. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, for access through or use of the'property within the proposed subdivision; ~ · That. the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems; !0 !1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Resolution No. 97-109 Page 2 K. The proposed project has been reviewed for conformity with the provisions of the Orange County Congestion Management Program, and it has been determined, that the additional traffic generated by the proposed project onto the CMP Highway System does not cause the system to exceed established level of service standards (ELS); and, L . That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-Element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-Element. II. The City Council hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 97-164, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3556, incorporated herein by reference. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 3rd day of November, 1997. JEFFERY M. THOMAS MAYOR PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK '. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) SS I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 97-109 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 3rd day of November, 1997, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYEs: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBERABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK