HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 TLLD ANN'L ASSESS. 05-19-97NO 12
5-19-97
TO:
FROM'
SUBJECT:
WR~IAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 199%98 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE
TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council, at their meeting of
resolutions:
May 19, 1997, adopt the following
1. Resolution No. 9741 approving the Engineer's Report for the Fiscal Year 1997-98; and
2. Resolution No. 9742 declaring its intention to levy assessments beginning with Fiscal Year
1997-98 and set a Public Heating for July 7, 1997.
FISCAL IMPACT
If the assessments are ratified by the property owners through the Proposition 218 assessment ballot
proceedings, the landscape maintenance and public street lighting expenses within the Tustin Ranch area
will be recouped through the levy of the annual assessments for the District. If the property owners fail to
ratify the assessment through the ballot proceedings, an alternate method of financing landscaping and
street lighting expenses adjacent to public streets will need to be determined.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Proposition 218, passed by the voters in November 1996, changes State law on how assessments for street
fighting and landscape maintenance can be applied to property. The most significant change for Tustin
Ranch is that assessments must be ratified by property owners through an assessment ballot proceeding.
To comply with the new law, Tustin's Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District ballot will be placed
before all property owners in the District for approval. Property owner approval of the assessments will be
required in order for the District to remain in place. A notice to all property Owners in the District along
with a ballot and an information brochure will be mailed to each record owner 45 days prior to the July 7,
1997 public hearing.
Levy of Annual Assessments for the 1997-98 FY - Tustin Landscape and Lighting District
May 19, 1997
Page 2
Each year, the City determines how much it will cost to provide the street lighting and landscape
maintenance services in Tustin Ranch. This total cost is divided among the parcels on a proportionate
share, based on a report prepared by consultant engineers. The precise method used to establish each
parcel's special benefit may vary according to usage and zone, but similar parcels with equal benefit from
the District pay equal assessments.
There are approximatdy 4,361 parcels within the District. The District includes three separate zones based
upon the special benefits received. Properties located in one zone pay only for arterial and collector
lighting. Properties located in another zone pay for arterial and collector street lighting as well as parkway,
slope and trail landscaping. Properties are located in a third zone if they have the benefit of arterial and
collector street lighting; parkway, slope and trail landscaping; and local residential lighting. Those parcels
that pay for local residential lighting are located within the tracts that have public streets.
Typically, owners of single family residential parcels in each zone pay an equal share. The proposed
assessment to be paid by single family residential parcels in each of the following benefit zones are:
Arterial & Collector Street Lighting (ACLT)
ACLT Parkway Slope & Trail Landscaping (PSTL) '
ACLT & PSTL + Local Residential Lighting
$ 7.91 per year
$50.38 per year
$69.96 per year
The total costs to be assessed for lighting and landscape maintenance for Fiscal Year 1997-98 are $73,833
and $318,504 respectively for a total operating and maintenance assessment of $392,337.
The Engineer's Report prepared by Berryman & Henigar, Inc. has been filed with the City Clerk and
contains the following proposed levy of assessments beginning with Fiscal Year 1997-98 along with a
comparable to last years assessment.
ASSESSMENT RATE 'SUMMARY BY LAND USE
PROPOSED 1997-98 FISCAL YEAR ASSESSMENT
ACLT ACLT + ACLT + PSLT FY 96/97
PSLT +LRLT ASSMT.
Single FamilY Res. ($/DU) $50.38/DU $69.96/DU $50.38/DU
Multi-Family Res. ($/DU) $37.79 $37.79/DU
Non-Residential (S/ac) $302.28/ac $302.28/ac
Non-Res-Tustin Market Place (S/ac) $47.46/ac $78.60/ac
Golf Course (S/ac) $201.52/ac $223.68/ac
Vacant and Parks (S/ac) $100.76/ac $223.68/ac
Levy of Annual Assessments for the 1997-98 FY- TUstin Landscape and Lighting District
May 19, 1997
Page 3
CONCLUSION
The two attached resolutions require adoption by the City Council at their May 19, 1997 meeting. These
resolutions provide for the following:
Resolution No. 9741 approves the Engineer's Report for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year for the levy
of annual assessment for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District
Resolution No. 9742 declares the City Council's intention to provide for an annual levy of
assessment for said Landscape and Lighting District to levy and collect assessments pursuant to
the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Resolution No. 9742, sets the date, time and place
for a public heating concerning the annual levy of assessment for the District and orders a
forty-five (45) day written notice to property owners. The hearing is scheduled for Monday,
July 7, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin,
Califomia.
Tim D. Seflet ~
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Associate Civil Engineer
1
2
RESOLUTION NO. 97-41
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CTFY OF TUSTIN, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR Tile
1997-98 FISCAL YEAR FOR ~ LEVY OF ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT FOR ~ TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND
LIGHTING DISTRICT
7
8
9
WItEREAS, by Resolution 97-23, the City Council initiated proceedings for the
1997-98 Fiscal Year for the levy of annual assessments and ordered the Engineer to prepare a
report in accordance with Section 22565 of the State of California Streets and Highways
Code and Proposition 218; and
10
11
12
13
WHEREAS, pursuant to said resolution, the Engineer has filed the report with the
City Clerk; and
· ·
· . · . ...
WItEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted the report to the City Council and the
City Council now has reviewed and examined the report so as submitted.
14
15
16
17
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Tustin determines and orders as follows:
Section 1. That the report prepared by the Engineer including description of
the improvement, estimated costs and. diagram, as filed with the City Clerk, is hereby
approved.
18
19
Clerk.
Section 2:
A copy of this report shall remain on file in the office of the City
21
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tustin held on the 19th day of May, 1997.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Jeffrey M. Thomas, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 97-42
3 A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TUSTIN, ORANGE
COUNTY, CAI.IFORNIA, DECI.,ARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN
4 ANNUAL IJEVY OF ASSESSMENT BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 FOR
5 THE IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING FACILITIES IN ~ TusTIN RANCIt AREA
6 WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
DISTRICT AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO
7 THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND PROPOSmON 218
8 AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF
9
10
11
12
13:
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
:>3
24
25
26
27
28
WItE~S, the City Council by Resolution No. 97-23 initiated proceedings for
the annual levy of assessments for the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Pan 2, Division 15 of the California
Streets and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218; and
- .
.
· ..
· .
. ...
..
WHEREAS, by said Resolution No. 97-23, the City Council ordered the City
Engineer to prepare a report pursuant to Section 22565 of said Code and Proposition 218;
and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer did prepare and file such a report and it was
approved by the City Council on the 19th day bfMay 1997, with the passage and adoption of
Resolution 97-41.
NOW, TgW~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Tustin determines and orders as follows:
Section 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the
intention of the City Council of the City of Tustin to order the annual levy of assessments
beginning with Fiscal Year 1997-98 and to levy and collect said assessments pursuant to the
provision of said Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1'972 (Part 2 of Division 15 of said Streets
and Highways Code) as amended and Proposition 218.
Section 2: That the improvements to be undertaken consist of the installation,
maintenance, servicing and operations of those certain public landscaping and lighting
facilities located within the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District. The Assessment District
designed as Tustin Landscape and Lighting District generally encompasses that portion of the
City known as East Tustin, being north of 1-5 Freeway and east of Browning Avenue except
the areas of all public streets, avenues, lanes, alleys, and fights-of-way provided, however,
notwithstanding property owned by railroad and public utility companies not used for public
purposes shall be included in the district and not be excluded pursuant to the aforesaid
exceptions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 3: That reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file with
the City Clerk and open to inspection for a fully detailed description of the improvements, the
boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments
upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.
Section4: That said proposed maintenance, servicing and operation of
landscaping and fighting in the opinion of the City Council of the City of Tustin will be to the
benefit of the property lying within the described boundaries of the Assessment District as
said Assessment District is described and defined in said Engineer's Report.
Section 5' Notice is hereby given that Monday, July 7, 1997, at the hour of
7:00 p.m. at the Tustin City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, Califomia
92680 is hereby fixed as the time and place where all interested persons may appear before
the City Council and be heard conceming the annual levy of assessments of the District, and
extent of the District, the services to be performed, and the proposed assessment and all other
matters relating thereto.
· .. . . ..
·
. .
..
Section 6: .The City Clerk shall cause written notice, in accordance with
Proposition 218, to be mailed to property owners in the district forty-five (45) days in
advance of the Public Hearing. Property owners shall receive a ballot, along with the notice,
in order to register their approval or disapproval of the assessment.
Property owners .who choose to participate in the assessment ballot proceedings
must complete and remm their ballots by the close of the public heating that starts at 7:00
P.M. on July 7, 1997.
Section 7: The City Clerk shall cause additional notice' of the hearing to be
given by causing the Resolution of Intention to be posted and published in the manner
required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Tustin held on the 19th day of May .1997.
Jeffrey M. Thomas, Mayor
ATrEST:
City Clerk
•
BS/ Consultants /nc - Hen/gar& Ray /nc
Berryan & Henigar
f 11 U L5
TUSTIN PUBLIC WORKS P
ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
Fiscal Year 1997 - 98
CITY OF TUSTIN
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared by-
Berryman & Henigar
May 14, 1997
11
11
1
1
11
ft
1
1
1
111
11
11
r
1
1
1
City of Tustin - Enginee_eport
Landscape and Lighting District
•
May 14, 1997
ENGINEER'S REPORT
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council The
undersigned certifies that he or she is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.
DATED. May 14, 1997 Berryman & Henigar
Joan E. Cox, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 41965
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed in the office of the City Clerk on the _ day
of 1997
City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll
thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, on the _ day of 1997
City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County California
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Assessment Roll was filed with the County Auditor of
the County of Orange on the _ day of 1997
City Clerk,
City of Tustin
Orange County California
By
NI \SPROJECTTUSTI]'LLLA DJ VO7- 96\REPORTNtEPORT I DOC
Page 1 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin - Enginee eport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Submittal and Acknowledgements 1
Introduction. 3
Report 4
Part A - Plans and Specifications 6
Part B - Estimate of Cost 9
Part C - Assessment Roll 10
Part D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment. 11
Part E - Property Owner List 18
Part F - Assessment District Diagram 18
APPENDIX
Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map
Assessment Diagram/Boundary Map
Preliminary Assessment Roll (under separate cover)
M `SPROIEC'TTt STIN LLNID *V97.98 REPORTSIREPORT I DOC
Page 2 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin - Engine eport
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the engineering analysis to levy the
assessments in the Tustin Landscape and Lighting District beginning with the 1997 -98 fiscal
year
The District was formed on July 15 1985 to install and maintain certain street lighting and
landscaping in the area bounded by Browning Avenue, Irvine Boulevard, Jamboree Road
(formerly Myford Road) and the I -5 Freeway within the City of Tustin. Assessments for the
benefiting property were confirmed for the first fiscal year, 1985 -86, and each fiscal year
thereafter As property developed in the Tustin Ranch area, such development was required to
annex to the District. A few scattered parcels outside of the Tustin Ranch area have also been
added to the District for lighting installation and maintenance.
Since the passage of Proposition 218 (Prop 218) which was approved on the November
Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the State Constitution, new procedures must be
followed to levy assessments under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the `72 Act')
As a result of the new procedures required by Prop 218 the City has decided to re- analyze
the District to identify the special benefits associated with the improvements for each property
in the District, commencing with the 1997 -98 fiscal year
IMPROVEMENTS
The District improvements consist solely of parkway landscaping, trail landscaping, slope
landscaping and street lighting in public rights -of -way and dedicated easements. The District
does not install or maintain parks or median islands
This report covers the levy of annual assessments beginning with the 1997 -98 fiscal year The
base assessment rate which may be levied for each EDU may be increased by the Consumer
Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI) for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in
any fiscal year by City Council approval each year The base assessment rate will be that rate
as approved and noticed for Fiscal Year 1997 -98
N '3PROIECTTUSTWiLL MDTYo].98\REPORTS\REPORTI DOC
Page 3 Berryman & Henigar
1 City of Tustin - Engineteport •
Landscape and Lighting >'strict May 14, 1997
1
1
1
1
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CITY OF TUSTIN
FISCAL YEAR 1997 -98
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679
OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
Article XIIID of the California Constitution and in accordance with the Resolution of Initiation
adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin, State of California, in connection with the
proceedings for
TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District' or "District" I, Joan E. Cox, P E. the
authorized representative of Berryman & Henigar the duly appointed ENGINEER OF
WORK, submit herewith the 'Report" consisting of six (6) parts as follows:
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and specifications for the improvements are as set forth on the lists thereof attached
hereto and are on file in the Office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by
reference
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
An estimate of the costs of the proposed improvements including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith, is as set forth on the lists thereof attached hereto and are
on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference
Al \ PROJECT \TU STIR \LLAMD \Y97- 9S\REPORTS\ REPORT I DOC
Page 4 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin Engineelleport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvements on each benefited lot or parcel of
land within the Assessment District is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and incorporated
herein by reference.
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The method of apportionment of assessments indicates the proposed assessment of the net
amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements to be assessed upon the several lots and
parcels of land within the Assessment District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to
be received by such lots and parcels.
PART E
PROPERTY OWNER LIST
A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this Assessment
District, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of Orange, is keyed
to the records of the Assessor of the County of Orange which are incorporated herein by
reference
PART F
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The Diagram of the Assessment District Boundaries showing the exterior boundaries of the
Assessment District, the boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines
and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the Assessment District is on file in the
Office of the City Engineer and is incorporated herein by reference
The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines
and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange for the fiscal year
to which this Report applies The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference
herein and made part of this Report.
Al SPROIECTTUSTINLL.LSID'1,D -Q8 ■REPORTSVmEPORTI DOC
Page 5 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin - Enginee•eport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
PART A
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The facilities, which have been constructed within the City of Tustin, and those which may be
subsequently constructed, will be serviced and maintained as generally described as follows.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE CITY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1997 -98
The existing facilities to be maintained and serviced include street lighting and arterial
landscaping as described herein.
• LIGHTING
The street lighting system in the District consists of 894 lights. A summary by type and
size follows:
No. Size of Lumens Type of Light
1 22,000 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
503 16,000 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
11 9,500 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
379 5,800 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
Additional street lights will be installed in the future as properties are developed in the
District.
• LANDSCAPING
The 1997 -98 arterial landscaping includes parkway and slope landscaping in the Tustin
Ranch area, specifically •
• the southerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road
• the northerly side of Bryan Avenue between Browning Avenue and Jamboree Road,
excepting that portion adjacent to the SCE substation
• the easterly side of Browning Avenue between the northerly corner of Tract No 13094
(southerly of Bent Twig Lane) and El Camino Real excepting that portion adjacent to
the SCE substation
• the westerly side of Tustin Ranch Road between the Santa Ana Freeway and Jamboree
Road
M \SPROJECNUSTRMLLMDT M7- 98\REPORTS∎REPORTI DOC
Page 6 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin - Engineeiseport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
• the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Kinsman Circle and Jamboree Road,
excepting that portion adjacent to the Golf Course northerly and southerly of the main
entrance and that portion adjacent to the park site at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola
Parkway
• the easterly side of Tustin Ranch Road between Bryan Avenue and Heritage Way
• the southerly side of Irvine Boulevard between the westerly City limits and ±630 feet
easterly of Myford Road
• the northerly side of Irvine Boulevard between Jamboree Road and West City Limit
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road from Bryan Avenue to ±1100 feet northerly
• the westerly side of Jamboree Road between Irvine Boulevard and the northerly City
limits
• the slopes on the westerly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and
±600 feet southerly
• the slopes on the easterly side of Jamboree Road between the northerly City limits and
Tustin Ranch Road
• La Colina Drive, northerly and southerly sides, between Tustin Ranch Road and the
westerly City limits
• Portola Parkway both northerly and southerly sides, between Jamboree Road and
Tustin Ranch Road
• Equestrian/Hiking Trail between Tustin Ranch Road /Portola Parkway and Peters
Canyon Regional Park.
The total landscaped area is approximately 46 8 acres These areas are shown on Exhibit
A - Landscape Maintenance Facilities Map in the Appendix.
The District will fund costs in connection with the District maintenance and servicing
including, but not limited to personnel, electrical energy water materials, contracting
services, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory operation of these facilities.
Reference is made to Part 'D" of this report for a discussion of the Zones of Benefit and the
facilities associated with them which are serviced and maintained. The facilities are described
as follows
M \ SPROJ ECTI TUSTIMLLMD 9- 99 REPORTS \REPORT] DOC
Page 7 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin Engineer' ort
Landscape and Lighting District
•
May 14, 1997
J,andscapirtg and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to Landscaping, planting, shrubbery trees,
irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, sidewalk maintenance resulting from landscape
growth Ind appurtenant facilities, in public rights -of -way parkways, and dedicated
easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District.
J.iphting and Appurtenant Facilities
Facilities include but are not limited to Poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, conductors,
equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and appurtenant
facilities as required to provide lighting in public rights -of -way and dedicated easements
within the boundaries of said Assessment District.
The public lighting system shall be maintained to provide adequate illumination.
Electricity for street lights shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company
and it shall be adequate for the intended purpose. Rates for power shall be those
authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and
appurtenant facilities, including repair removal or replacement of all or part of any of the
landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities, providing for the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying,
fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and
other solid waste.
Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of the landscaping and the
maintenance of any of the public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities and the furnishing
of electric energy for the public lighting facilities, or for the lighting or operation of
landscaping or appurtenant facilities
The plans and specifications for the improvements, showing the general nature, location and
the extent of the improvements, are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are by
reference herein made a part of this report.
SI 3PROJECTTUSTJ NLLND■FY97.98IREPORTSaEPORTI DOC
Page 8 Berryman & Henigar
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
City of Tustin - Engine•eport •
Landscape and Lighting District
May 14, 1997
PART B
ESTIMATE OF COST
The City's budget for the operation and service costs, shown below details the estimated costs
and fund balances for Fiscal Year 1997 -98 as available at the time of preparation of this
report. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost can be recovered in the assessment spread
including incidental expenses. This is not changed by Article XIIID of the California
Constitution. The latter can include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage,
publishing, and all other related costs identified with the district proceedings.
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set -up for the revenues and expenditures of the
District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The
City will make funds available to the district to ensure adequate cash flow and will be
reimbursed upon receipt of assessments Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be
carried over to the next fiscal year
M ` SPROJECTSUSTRALLNIDTV9 7- 9 /DREPORTSIREPORT I DOC
Page 9 Berryman & Henigar
District
Budgets Admin.
Total to
Asmt
ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR STREET LIGHTING
Total lighting costs
(Less local residential lights)
(Less east side Jamboree lights)
(Less City contribution for area outside Tustin Ranch)
$89,617
($7 497)
($9 161)
($6,288)
Subtotal Arterial & Collector Street Lighting
$66,671 ($62)
$66,609
LOCAL RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING
Local residential lighting costs
$7,231
Subtotal Local Residential Lighting
$7,231 ($7)
$7,224
PARKWAY SLOPE & TRAIL LANDSCAPING
Total Tustin Ranch Area landscaping costs
$318,800
Subtotal Parkway Slope & Trail Landscaping
$318,800 ($296)
$318,504
Total 0 & M Asmt Amount
$392,702 ($365)
$392,337
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION
District Administration Costs
Cashflow Reserves @ ± 20%
(Less Fund Balance at end of FY 1996 -97)
$43,650
$83,780
($127,795)
Subtotal District Administration
($365)
Total to Assessment District
$392,337
The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set -up for the revenues and expenditures of the
District. Funds raised by assessment shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The
City will make funds available to the district to ensure adequate cash flow and will be
reimbursed upon receipt of assessments Any balance or deficit remaining on July 1 must be
carried over to the next fiscal year
M ` SPROJECTSUSTRALLNIDTV9 7- 9 /DREPORTSIREPORT I DOC
Page 9 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin - Engine " Report
Landscape and Lighting District
•
May 14, 1997
PART C
ASSESSMENT ROLL
The Assessment Roll is a listing of the proposed assessment and the amount
Fiscal Year 1997 -98 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the
Assessor's Office, and contained in the Assessment Roll on file in the office
of the City of Tustin, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of' the Assessor
Orange and these records are, by reference, made part of this Report.
of assessment for
latest roll at the
of the City Clerk
of the County of
M UPKOJECTTUSTINQLMD FT9b98∎REPORTS REPORT I DOC
Page 10 Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin Engineeleport
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
•
PART D
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
GEN RA
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by cities for the purpose of providing
certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of street
lights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities.
Section 22573 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be
levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all
assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each
such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if
"by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas
will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." (Sec. 22574). Thus, the 1972
Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218 (Prop. 218), the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act" which was approved
on the November 1996 Statewide ballot and added Article XIIID to the Califomia Constitution,
requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special
benefit conferred on that parcel. Prop. 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and
the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. Prop. 218 also requires that
publicly owned property which benefit from the improvements be assessed.
REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the operation, servicing and
maintenance of landscaping, lighting and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to,
personnel, electrical energy utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items
necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services.
EQUIVALENT DWFLLING 1 NITS
Since the assessment will be levied against parcels of property as shown on the tax roll, the final
charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number If assessments were to be spread just by
parcel, not considering land use or parcel size, a single family parcel would be paying the same
as a 50 unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment in a similar zone and this
would not be equitable.
NI UPROJECTTUSTINLLLNIDT YQ7- 98\REPORTS\REPORTI DOC
Page 11 Berryman 8 Henigar
City of Tustin - Engine•eport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
The single family residential lot has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of assessments
and is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). A methodology has been developed to
calculate the EDUs for other residential land uses and for non - residential parcels. Every land -use
is converted to EDU's: parcels containing apartments are converted to EDU's based on the
number of dwelling units on each parcel of land; commercial parcels are converted based on the
lot size of each parcel of land.
The EDU method is seen as the most appropriate and equitable for landscape and lighting
districts, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of
land -use type and size.
Single Family Residential (SFR). Parcels zoned for single family residential uses are
assessed 1 EDU per dwelling unit. Parcels designated as SFR Land -use will be assessed 1
EDU per dwelling unit, including vacant subdivided residential lots and vacant land zoned
for single family residential uses with a tentative or final tract map.
Multiple Family Residential. Multiple - residential (including condominiums) land use
equivalencies are determined based on the number of dwelling units on each parcel. Due to
population density and size of structure relative to the typical single family residence, each
dwelling unit defined as multi - family residential, including condominiums, would be 0 75
EDU
The EDU's assigned to a multiple - residential parcel are calculated by multiplying the
number of dwelling units by the EDU factor of 0 75 This includes vacant multi - family
residential parcels zoned for multiple - residential uses with a tentative or final tract map
Non- Residential. In converting non - residential properties to EDUs, the factor used is the
City of Tustin's typical standard single family residential lot area and the number of Lots that
could be subdivided into an acre of land. All properties that are developed for non- residential
uses are therefore assigned 6 EDU's per acre. These include commercial, industrial, church,
school and other non - residential uses.
Vacant Parcels with No Development Designation. Vacant parcels with no development
designation or without a tentative or final map are assigned a reduced equivalency due to
their current lack of immediate development potential. Based upon the opinions of
professional appraisers appraising current market property values for real estate in Southern
California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the
total value of the property In Tustin Ranch, the land value portion of a single family
detached residence appears to be typically 30 percent or higher of the total value based on the
County Assessor's tax rolls. Therefore, vacant parcels are assigned equivalency units at the
rate of 30 percent of improved property which is 6 EDU / acre x 30% = 2.0 EDU / acre. Park
parcels are also considered as vacant with no development potential, and are assessed at that
rate.
M U PROIECTIT11STIV ∎LLMDTY97-98\REPORTS%EPORT I DOC
Page 12 Berryman & Henigar
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
r
City of Tustin - EngineeSeport •
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
Peters Canyon Regional Park is a large, natural, open space park with very few facilities,
which straddles the cities of Orange and Tustin and a portion of unincorporated county area.
The park has many access points around its perimeter and one is within the Tustin Ranch
area. This park receives a very small amount of benefit relative to its size, and it seems
reasonable to compare it to other existing parks within Tustin Ranch. There are five
currently developed parks, three public parks (Camino Real, Laurel Glen, and the Tustin
Sports Park) and two private parks, with an average park size of 6.26 acres. Therefore, 6.26
acres have been used to estimate the relative benefit Peters Canyon Regional Park receives.
Golf Course Property Golf Course parcels are developed commercial property but the
development is at a very low level. Therefore, golf course parcels are assessed at a rate
between developed and vacant land, at twice the rate of vacant parcels with no development
designation, which is 2.0 EDU / acre x 2 = 4 0 EDU / acre.
Public Property Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that all benefiting
public properties be assessed for their fair share of the special benefit. Public property which
is designated for residential or non - residential purposes (such as schools and fire stations)
will be assessed the same as private property with the same designation. Public parks will be
assessed the same as vacant parcels with no development designation.
Exempt. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues,
public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public drainage, public
easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and parkways. Also excepted from
assessment would be utility rights -of -way common areas (such as in condominium
complexes), landlocked parcels, unbuildable parcels vacated by the City and parcels
designated on Tract or Parcel Maps for landscaping.
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT (EDU) FORMULA
Land Use Basic Unit x EDU Factor =
EDU Rates
Single Family Res. (SFR)
1 D U
x
100
=
1 EDU/DU
Multi- family Res. (including Condos)
1 D U
x
0 75
=
0.75 EDU/DU
Commercial/Industrial and other Non- Residential
1 Acre
x
6.00
=
6.0 EDU /ac
Vacant (including Parks)
1 Acre
x
2.00
=
2.0 EDU /ac
Golf Courses
1 Acre
x
4 00
=
4.0 EDU /ac
SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS
STREET LIGHTING BENEFIT
Proper maintenance and operation of the street lighting system benefits all properties within
the Tustin Ranch by providing security safety and community character and vitality as
M \SPROIECTTUSTIMLLMDTV ;•9S\REPORTS\REPORTI DOC
Page 13 Berryman 8 Henigar
City of Tustin - Engineelleport
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
•
outlined below Street lights provide only incidental benefits to motorists traveling to, from or
through the area.
BENEFITS OF STREET LIGHTING
Security and Safety
Mitigates crime
Alleviates the fear of crime
Enhances pedestrian safety
Community Character and Vitality
Promotes social interaction
Promotes business and industry
Contributes to a positive nighttime visual image
A large portion of the City of Tustin is within an Ad Valorem Lighting Maintenance District
and is paying for the operation and maintenance of street lights in this manner Tustin Ranch,
being a recent annexation to the City was not a part of this Ad Valorem Maintenance District;
therefore, the 1972 Landscape and Lighting District was established in 1985 to fund the public
street lights in developing areas. Those properties that are adjacent to private streets pay for
their local street lights through their Home Owners Association fees.
Additional properties were subsequently annexed into the Landscape and Lighting District if
they were developing and were not within the Ad Valorem Maintenance District. There are 1
22,000 lumen light, 46 16,000 lumen lights and 12 5,800 lumen lights serving these parcels.
Because these properties are scattered throughout the City and adjoin parcels which are not
included in either District, the detailed benefit analysis which is required by Code has not yet
been accomplished. Therefore, the City is making a 100% contribution for the lighting benefit
of these parcels
Tustin Ranch Arterial and Collector Lighting. Street lighting on the arterials and
collector streets provide special and direct benefits to all properties within the Tustin
Ranch area, as these lighting benefits are directly related to the positive enhancement of the
Community and therefore increase property desirability and quality of life All properties
within Tustin Ranch receive a special benefit from lighting on the arterial and collectors.
Lighting at intersections, which is defined as safety lighting, is considered to be the
minimum lighting requirement for vehicular safety• therefore safety lighting represents
the general benefit portion of street lighting and is not assessed. Traffic Signals are also
considered to provide a general benefit and are not assessed.
Street lights which are not adjacent to the Tustin Ranch development area are deemed not
to benefit the area. There are 82 16,000 lumen lights on the east side of Jamboree Road,
north of Irvine Boulevard, which provide benefit to the property on the east side of
Jamboree, which is unincorporated county area and not within the District. Therefore, the
City will provide funding for these lights and the costs will not be assessed.
Local Residential Lighting. Many of the residential units in the Tustin Ranch area have
private street lighting systems directly adjacent to their homes. This lighting is usually
provided by a Home Owners Association, and payment for the lights are usually made
through association dues or assessments. Parcels that have local residential street lighting
provided by the City receive special and direct local lighting benefit and are assessed for
M ` 3PROJECTCT USTMLLLM06Y97- o8'REPORTPREPORT I DOC
Page 14 Berryman & Henigar
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
City of Tustin - Enginee•eport •
Landscape and Lighting District
May 14, 1997
those local lights. There are 87 local residential 5800 lumen lights and 1 9,500 lumen
light, and the cost for these lights are assessed only to these benefiting parcels.
The following tables provide a preliminary summary of Street Lighting Assessment Rates for the
District
Tustin Ranch Arterial & Collector Lighting Benefit
Land Use
Parcels
Dwellings
Acres
EDU's
Single Family Residential
1 494
2,356
2,356.000
Multi- family Residential
2,767
5,201
3,900.750
Non - Residential
49
185.249
1 111 494
Schools
8
20.337
122.022
Vacant
8
83.696
167.392
Parks
23
74 817
149.634
Golf Course
12
152.380
609.520
4,361
8,416.812
Arterial & Collector Lighting Budget = $66,609
Assessment Rate = $7.91 / EDU
Local Residential Lighting Benefit
Land Use
Parcels
Dwellings
EDU's
Single Family Residential
279
369
369.000
279
369
369 000
Local Residential Lighting Budget = $7,224
Assessment Rate = $19.58 / EDU
LANDSCAPING BENEFIT
Trees, landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide
beautification, shade and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore
increase property value. In Parkways and Land Value., written by John Nolan and Henry V
Hubbard in 1937 it is stated:
there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and
common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property even though the
amount cannot be determined exactly Indeed, in most cases where public
money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that
the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City It has been
believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values
throughout the City or in parts of the City "
It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as
the landscaping along side the roadway
M \ SPROJEcTTIUSTM LLLMD\F1'97.98\REPORTS\REPORTI DOC
Page 15 Berryman & Henigar
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
City of Tustin - Engineeeport •
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
Landscaping along recreational trails and greenbelts, if well maintained, provide beautification
and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings, and therefore increase property value.
In "Greenways for America" by Charles E. Little, it is stated:
" [real estate] agents routinely advertise properties as being on or near the
trail. .property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke -Gilman Trail is
significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an average
of 6 percent more as a result of its proximity to the trail. Property immediately
adjacent to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell. .trails are an amenity
that helps sell homes, increase property values and improve the quality of life."
Additionally the National Recreation and Park Association, in June 1985, stated:
"The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in
or near the recreation area, and is of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a
stake in a maximum of total assessed values."
Tustin Ranch enjoys a higher level of landscaping and streetscaping in their parkways and slopes
than the rest of the City of Tustin. The City provides funding for the landscaped medians in the
area, so these costs are not assessed. Additionally a pedestrian and equestrian trail, which will
one day be linked with the regional trail system, is landscaped and beautified by the District.
The landscape improvements along the arterial and collector streets, in the parkways and slopes,
and the regional trail enhance the beauty of the area and benefit all parcels in the community
Excepted from this landscaping benefit is the Tustin Marketplace and the Tustin Auto Center,
which provide their own landscaping adjacent to their properties at an even higher level than the
rest of Tustin Ranch. Landscaping along roadways provides only incidental benefits to motorists
traveling to, from or through the area.
Landscaped Parkway, Slope & Trail Benefit
Land Use
Parcels
Dwellings
Acres
EDU's
Single Family Residential
1 494
2,356
2,356.000
Multi- family Residential
2,767
5,201
3,900.750
Non - Residential
9
32 304
193.824
Schools
8
20.337
122.022
Vacant
8
83 696
167.392
Parks
23
74.817
149.634
Golf Course
12
152.380
609.520
4,321
7 499.142
Landscape Pkwy Slope & Trail Budget = $318,504
Assessment Rate = $42.47 / EDU
1.f ` SPROJECT∎ TUSTIR U.LMDFT9;.9S' REPORTS 'REPORT! DOC
Page 16 Berryman & Henigar
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
City of Tustin - Enginee•eport •
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
The tables below summarize the assessment amounts for parcels in each of the zones of benefit.
The base assessment rate which may be levied for each EDU may be increased by the Consumer
Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI) for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any
fiscal year by City Council approval each year The base assessment rate will be that rate as
approved and noticed for Fiscal Year 1997 -98.
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY
ACLT +
Benefit Categories Rate per EDU
ACLT
Arterial & Collector Lighting $7 91
/
EDU
LRLT
Local Residential Lighting
$19.58
/
EDU
PSTL
Pkwy, Slope and Trail Landscape
$42.47
/
EDU
ACLT =
$7.91
/
EDU
ACLT + PSTL =
$50.38
/
EDU
ACLT + PSTL + LRLT =
$69.96
/
EDU
The base assessment rate which may be levied for each EDU may be increased by the Consumer
Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI) for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside Area in any
fiscal year by City Council approval each year The base assessment rate will be that rate as
approved and noticed for Fiscal Year 1997 -98.
ASSESSMENT RATE SUMMARY BY LAND USE
ACLT +
ACLT + PSTL
FY 96 -97
ACLT
PSTL
+ LRLT
Asmt
Single Family Res. ($ / DU)
$50.38 / DU
$69.96 / DU
$50.38 / DU
Multi- family Res. ($ / DU)
$37 79 / DU
$37 79 / DU
Non - Residential ($ / ac)
$302.28 / ac
$302.28 / ac
Non -Res Tustin Market Place ($ / ac)
$47 46 / ac
$78.60 / ac
Golf Course ($ / ac)
$201.52 / ac
$223.68 / ac
Vacant and Parks ($ / ac)
$100.76 / ac
$223.68 / ac
I, Joan E. Cox, P.E. the authorized representative of Berryman & Henigar, the duly appointed
Assessment Engineer, am of the opinion that the assessments have been apportioned in
accordance with the estimated special benefit derived by each parcel and that the assessments do
not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit.
DATED• May 14 1997 Berryman & Henigar
Bv•
AN E. C , P.E.
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
R.C.E. No 41965
M, SPROJ ECT,T USTIN V.LMDSY97- 98,REPORTS'REPORTI DOC
Page 17
Berryman & Henigar
City of Tustin Enginee•eport
•
Landscape and Lighting District May 14, 1997
PART E
PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
The property owner list with the names and addresses of each property owner of each lot or
parcel, as shown on the Assessment Diagram referenced in Part F herein, is the list of property
owners within the District Boundaries as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the
County of Orange and is, by reference, made part of this report.
PART F
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the Assessment District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The
lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and
dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Orange, for the year when this
Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report.
M SPROIECTTUSTIM LLMDT1'97- QgaEPORTS■REPORTI DOC
Page 18 Berryman & Henigar
Appendix
r— M -- i• i• i• I MI i -- MN all r
CITY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES MAP
LEGEND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
CT
501 -171 -0
THRU 26
TRACT
No. 14188
57 UNITS
501- 181 -01
THRU 31
501- 093 -16
0.901 AC.
03408.
SOOOOL
SITE
501-
093-1
1.731 AC.
501 -096-
1 THRU 64
501- 093 -11,13
19.48 AC.
NTLNC RE51012411.41
34- 28-060
MU 229
TRACT
No. 13788
170 UNITS
501-
14-01
.00 AC.
501 -097 -01
THRU 51
.Y
501 -095 -014849
78.170 AC.
WIT
COUt3C
501- 095 -12,
14,15
7.70 X.
501- 095 -04
17.70 AC.
501 - 121 -01
THRU 67
934 -08 -417
THRU 524
TRACT No. 13796
106 UMrs
PRIVATK PAM(
aXITAPT)
GOV
000RBE
501- 113 -15
687 AC.
501 - 113 -13 501 - 113 -18
18.23 AC. 14.44 AC.
MILNE
CT• PARK
501 -14I-
01,02.03
TRACT
No. 13786
300 two
938 -13 -183
THRU 499
TRACT
No. 13824
317 UNT5
TRACT No. 13908
07 1.15
501- 104-04
18.94 AC.
501- 131 -01
THRU 30
GOLF
COURSE
501- 109-01
THRU 70
TRACT
No. 13701
70 (0413
501- 108 -01
THRU 68
TRACT
No. 13990
91 111473
501- 107 -01
TNRU 23
501 - 191 -01
THRU 52
501 -761
02, 04
934 -28 -235
TNRU 311
TRACT
(4110
TRACT
2p
o. 13734
118 437913
501 -201 -01
THRU 66
501- 104 -01
TRACT No. 14883
223 1.9870
500 - 211 -05
SUS JIM
aaa?ARY
901001
STREET
00810441E
TOW
Cr
No 13053
DM 1
500 -251 -01
43
501 - 104-07
33.73 AC.
500- 221 -02
18.018 AC.
501 - 221 -01 THRU 64
934-44 -182 THRU 193
TRACT No.14784 and
No.14.937
190 WITS
S01 -113-08
xm AC
501- 113-07
COURSE
*AO AC
501 -113 -09
21.29 AC.
1- 103 -02
PR1VAlr PARK
(r2mwT)
1014
COURSE
501- 113 -01.02
TRACT No. 13733
730 18815
501- 113 -03,04
TRACT No. 14447
438 Ug13
ELME
SCHOOL 05!
501 -112 -01 1
15.817
*977 AG
501 -116 -01 THRU 05
501 - 116 -08 THRU 15
934 -08 -530 THRU 646
TRACT No. 13635
501 - 112 -05
THRU 08,
12 14, 16
MOOS AF
FUME arc
PAM[
•
938 - 13-505 THRU 820
TRACT No. 13746
316 (0115
500 -221 -03
23.970 AC.
TRACT No.
12868
500 -205 -01
TNRU 75
75 (8115
TRACT
No. 13080
THRU? 65 1
100 1.13
500 -272 -0f
TI/RU 35
41100044 ANC
TRACT No.
12732
937 -11 -129
TNRU 376
248 ours
TRACT
No. 13161
934 -08 -025
THRU 169
147 UW15
1
Pr.
r
ti4tJ<)
5438(11 PM(
01E (E155197)
500- 233 -02
TRACT
No. 13038
500-241 -14
TNRU 18
262 APART.
1'1
113106 934-28-767
500- 234 -01 THRU 803
1104345 TRACT 14782
9418813
pommel QCF.C.O. r177 1
BRYAN
TRACT No. 14610
500 - 185 -01 THRU 06
23.588 AC.
Ct4/40
REM.
1
TRACT
No. 13096
934 -08 -175
TNRU 411
237 70IM101ES
500 -241 -02
4,10 AC.
500 - 241 -03
9.16 AC.
TRACT
No. 13030
500- 244-0f
THRU 10
280 MAR?.
A
TRACT No.
12759
500 - 191 -14, 15
470 two
TRACT
No. 13044
500 - 207 -01
TNRU 47
500- 206 -01
TNRU 80
127 12413
TRACT NO. 13557
500- 312 -01 THIN 09
35.379 AC.
- 311 -01
TRACT No, 13556
500 -291 -02 THRU 12, 16
43442 AC.
(Mr
500 -291 -13.14
amen)
MATCHUNE
(%E 9400 urn
Sheet 1 of 2
®Berryman tionigar 2007 E. + •t. SiMI
85/ C. . u,. •7.8. • (711 668-7300 4x705
4- 30-97 T- FAGLII.DWG TLR
•
•
•
UM • -• NM OM •!- i so EN ow mg — — so ow —
CITY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES MAP
LEGEND
wyal• 0410.13,
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
SLOPE MAINTENANCE
Sheet 2 of 2
B.rryman do N.nlgnr 200, L + S+ »+
sa....e. ,go c..o .27"
.,•. .. ,. (w4> aab -
4 -30 -97 7- FACIL2GWG 71R
•
•
•
NMI • MN • NM i• NM G• MN OM MI NM M
CITY OF TUSTIN
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
FOR THE
1997 -1998 FISCAL YEAR
PER SECTION 22508 OF THE S k H CODEE,
DESCRIPTIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF PARCELS ARE
SH0W ON ORANGE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S YAPS
LEGEND
LOCAL RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING ZONE
RESIDENDAL ZONE R7 & R2
VACANT, PARK, GOLF COURSE
COMMERCIAL D£6ELCPED
PKWY SLOPE k TRAIL, LANDSCAPING ZONE
X272
ETai
lakIe
.i
R
C4N ON
RE
525∎02H^M
•
s t
507 - 451 -05M?
502 -451-
25.27.50.31'
OW �Ma
afar IC-
as war/
201 -
097 -10
MIA AP
)si 0407
,1MAII.t405 .
ud0F21a °14105'
wits
',We, 17075
50/-2$1 -1a
RMU tR
500 -24f.
Al. At.
lreir
0140714. 04702
HMG Mo. 13534
700-200 -02 T14R/ 12. I4
uW.s
/.rryman & H. lgar
(7100 s:s - ?8
A-30-97 \/ ,'\ If\ Immo =+ \MilkWyOV»7- 98\WORM \Mro197.OM0 ILA