HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTSAgenda Item 8
Reviewed:
AGENDA REPORT City Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: JULY 15, 2014
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS
SUMMARY:
This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly
Report for the first quarter of 2014. The average noise level measured at Tustin's
monitoring station (NMS 10N), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way
(Figure 1), remained consistent with pnor quarters during this first quarter reporting period.
Average noise levels durng the first quarter were well below the City, County, and State
criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNE =L) for residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No Fiscal Impact.
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
Staffs analysis and report of the quarterly John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Report
falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional
relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within
and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, in this instance, on matters of
airport traffic and noise.
JWA Noise Report
July 15, 2014
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a
Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their
website. Attached is the quarterly report for the first quarter of 2014, which includes the
months of January through March. An overview of the information contained within the
JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels, and an analysis of noise
complaints.
Measured Noise Levels
Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings primarily due to
engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many
other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in
bad weather engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder
than on clear days; routes; non - scheduled operations which could include military or
private aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate
of ascent.
During the first quarter of 2014, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on
Beneta Way was 54.9 dB. This is .8 dB higher than the average of the previous quarter
(October through December 2013). The average noise level for this quartet is similar to
the average for the entire year of 2013, which was 54.8dB. Figure 2 provides a
visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the first quarter of 2014. It
can be seen that the noise levels in Tustin are consistently below the average City,
County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL, with the month of January displaying the
lowest numbers overall. There was one anomaly during the month of February, as the
noise level data was unavailable on the 8" potentially due to a power outage at the
monitoring station.
70
60
5o
Z
> 40
J
J
30
ca
20
10
0
Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL)
in Tustin - January through March 2014
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Date
*Noise level data on February 8, 2014. was unavailable
Figure 2
January
�— February*
—March
Noise Impact Area Level (65 d13)
JWA Noise Report
July 15, 2014
Page 3
Noise Complaints
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and
complaints from local c;tizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County
monitoring area, noise complaints decreased by 16.2 percent during the first quarter of
2014 in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2013. It should be noted that approximately 71
percent of the complaints received throughout Orange County during the first quarter were
reported from one residence in Mission Viejo.
During the first quarter of 2014, there were four (4) Tustin area complaint calls, compared
to three (3) complaints during the previous quarter. The low level of complaints is typically
seen during cooler months when people spend less time outside, and therefore aircraft
noise may be less noticeable.
Tustin staff has outreached to John Wayne Airport to gather further details on the nature of
the complaints made by residents. The breakdown of the four (4) complaints from the first
quarter of 2014 are as follows: two (2) of the complaints were due to the noise of the
aircraft, and two (2) complaints referred to the flight path of the aircraft.
To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a
chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five years is displayed below
(Figure 3). Generally, there is a noticeable decrease in noise complaints during either the
first and fourth quarters, which further supports the theory that a decrease in complaints
tends to occur during the cooler months of fall and winter. Overall, the number of
complaints has not reached more than twelve (12) complaints in a s,ngle quarter during
th.s five -year reporting period.
Noise Complaints - Tustin
14 --- -
*- 10 _
Ti g
6
I—oil I A 1-1--u-S
aISti aa\^1 a, �0 a,�\T �ti\T a,�9 x¢51° a-�,\T 6�, ° a,4\T a11`tio a�,tio o-,���° x_119 �9 o-,1\T
Quarter /Year
Figure 3
JWA Noise Report
July 15, 2014
Page 4
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless
otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in
John Wayne Airport's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. Public
comments expressed at the March 12, 2014, meeting are attached as part of the quarterly
report. One resident from Costa Mesa spoke at this meeting. The next quarterly meeting
will be held on September 10, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. in the John Wayne Airport Administrative
Office located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa.
�C Ad nne f a- Johnson
Sr. Management Assistant
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attachment:
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014
ATTACHMENT
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for
January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014 (First Quarter)
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6:
Division of Aeronautics
Noise Standards
Submitted by:
Alan L. Murphy
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
INTRODUCTION
This is the 165th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Admimstravve Code Title 21, Chapter
2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the critcm! for
defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control
residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those
guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent. Level
(CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent
remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to
measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS -1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach
NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beech
NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach
NMS4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach
NMS -5S: 324'/ Vista Madera, Newport Beach
NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue. Santa Ana
NMS -ION: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure I shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (April 1, 2013 - March 31, 2014).
The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre -Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John
Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were
utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within
the "Noise Impact Area ".
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
Noise Monitoring rin Stations NMS)
Location Map
r
,I
AI Rf'OE�I
-2-
r
J'+�t `''!; t ��r' � ti + '; . �1 � f � �� f . '+ F` O k,x `r /' � ''•T� F
��� / �':;� sue. ; rl � ''\' • } , +y. .3 �Mr • • � � � i _
_ qr�.., .ter % ^ % }f � x
va� ot
IN
y #'' �r ;`y �� ,�. * / .. :" . Few �_' I `�f•''r„• i ��'a4��A+
ti y '* i�ti'�- �� r �f •xti ale 4 i
-' ;,,. _r {.. ,.. ,�L•:; `�'�
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I below. Air Carrier operational count
histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
TABLE 1
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
January - M z rch ? 0 14
Period
.Air Carriers
GA Jet (l)
Total
Operations (2)
Average Daily
Jet Operations
.1'1
Prop
January
6,700
0
1,987
19,303
280
February
5,999
0
1,997
I8,735
285
March
6,868
0
2,272
23,110
294
First Quarter
19,567
0
6,256
61,148
286
Twelve Months
04101113 - 0 , 1 14
8,930
0
24,896
248,401
295
NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor
stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA rcprescnta11ves.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNI L) average values for
each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5.
Insufficient data is indicated by " #N A" entries Ln each table.
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet
aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8.
ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM
Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigationi
easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009.
The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were
acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired
homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were
reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana
Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance
�: nd Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy -one dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise
Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour).
TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (January 1 2014 - March 31 2014
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates i-oise cal h, and complaints from local
citizens and all other sources. During January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014, the Office received 539
complaints from local citizens. This is a 16.2% decrease from the 643 complaints received last quarter. It is
a 209.8% increase from the 174 complaints received during the same quart ?r last year. Figure 4 shows the
distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities.
-4-
a
r
k
Aliso Viejo
Arch Beach Heights
Balboa Island
Balboa Peninsula
Corona
Corona Del filar
Costa Mle5a
Crystal Cove
Dana Point
Dover Shores
East bluff
Harbor Cove
Huntrrgton Beach
Irvine
Laguna Beach
Laguna Niguel
La! a Forest
Las Flores
Mission Vwjo
Miurrieta
N. Tustn
Newport Beach
Orange-
Panorama Heights
San Clemente
Santa Ana
Santa Ana Heights
Trabu_o Camon
Tustin
Unl nown
Westcliff
FIGURE 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
0 50 100 19) 2F7t,1 250 300 350 400
NUmber of Complaints
Note. All complaints from Mission Viejo were from one household.
-5-
2
F
4
13
1
2
6
7
�
1
1
17
1
4
44
28
1
3815
12
I
12
1
1
3
1
4
#
j
0 50 100 19) 2F7t,1 250 300 350 400
NUmber of Complaints
Note. All complaints from Mission Viejo were from one household.
-5-
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 04!01113 through 03.131114
Values in db at Each Site
Period
NMS Site
1S
is
3S
4S
5S
6S
TS
N
9N
ION
Apr 2013
65.7
64.9
64.3
57.7
57.2
58.5
54.9
67.1
43.2
55.7
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
30
May 2013
65.9
65.?
64.5
58.0
57.3
58.5
55.2
67.3
43.3
55.7
# Days
'1
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
29
31
Jun 2013
66.8
65.9
65.1
58.0
57.6
58.9
55.1
67.7
43.5
56.2
# Days
30
'0
30
26
..0
30
30
30
26
�0
Q -2 2013
66.2
65.3
64.6
57.9
57.4
58.6
55.0
67.4
43.3
55.9
Days
91
91
91
87
91
91
91
91
80
91
Jul 2013
66.6
6:x.8
65.1
57.9
57.5
58.6
54.7
67.6
43.1
55.4
Days
,1
31
.1
31
31
31
31
�l
30
31
Aug 2013
66.5
65.8
65.0
57.7
56.9
58.4
54.3
67.5
43.4
55.3
ii Days
31
31
kl
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
Sep 2013
66.0
65.v
64.3
57.2
56.5
57.8
54.1
66.8
43.8
52.5
' Days
30
30
}0
22
10
30
.0
30
28
30
Q -3 2013
66.4
65.6
64.8
57.6
57.0
58.3
54.4
67.3
43.4
54.6
# Days
92
92
92
84
92
92
92
92
89
92
Oct 2013
65.9
65.3
64.5
57.4
56.7
58.6
:4.7
66.9
42.4
54.1
Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
%1
31
29
31
Nov 2013
6;-.7
64.9
64.2
57.3
56.3
58.5
-A.4
66.5
44.3
54.3
Day
30
30
30
.0
30
30
29
30
'9
30
Dec 201.;
65.4
64.5
64.2
56.9
56.1
58.6
55.7
66.5
44.9
53.8
Days
31
31
31
31
31
3I
31
31
31
31
Q4 2013
65.7
64.9
64.3
57.2
56.4
58.6
55.0
66.6
44.0
54.1
Days
92
92
92
921
92
92
91
92
89
92
Jan 2014
65.3
64.5
64.0
56.6
56.1
58.1
53.8
65.9
43.5
53.5
# Days
31
31
3I
31
31
31
30
31
27
%I
Feb 2014
66.3
65.6
64.5
58.1
57.5
58.7
55.4
67.3
44.3
55.4
# Days
28
28
28
28
28
2q
28
28
26
27
Mar 2014
66.3
65.6
64.7
58.1
57.6
58.7
55.5
67.4
44.6
55.6
# Days
31
29
31
3I
31
31
31
31
30
31
Q -12014
66.0
65.2
64.4
57.6
57.1
58.5
55.0
66.9
44.1
54.9
Days
90
88
90
90
90
90
89
90
83
89
Q -2 2013 thru
Q -1 2014
Total
1
66.1
65.3
64.5
57.6
57.0
58.5
54.9
67.1
43.8
54.9
# Days
365
363
365
353
365
365
363
365
3411
364
Q -1 2013 thru Q4 2013 (Previous 4 Quarter)
Total
1
65.9 65.1
64A
57.5
56.9
58.4
54.7
669
43.5
54.8
Days
365 363
365
350
365
365
362
365
343
365
Change from Previous 4 Quarters
O.2F
0.21
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.21
O
0.3
0.1
-6-
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
January 2014
Date
NMS Site
1S
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
I 7S
8N
9N
ION
1
65.9
65.0
64.3
56.4
56.2
57.0
53.5
66.6
44.1
53.4
2
65.8
65.2
63.9
56.8
56.5
57.5
53.9
67.1
47.9
53.8
3
66.0
65.2
64.3
57.2
56.6
58.1
54.1
66.6
37.6
54.3
4
65.7
64.7
63.8
57.91
56.3
57.8
53.8
65.9
32.1
53.3
5
65.6
64.4
63.7
55.9
55.2
56.91
53.6
65.5
#N--'A
50.6
6
64.9
63.9
63.1
55.2
55.3
56.51
53.0
65.7
#N /A
51.5
7
65.6
64.7
63.8
57.0
56.2
57.2
54.5
66.0
44.6
53.6
66.5
65.6
64.8
58.3
57.5
58.7
55.2
66.7
45.51
54.9
9
66.6
65.7
64.7
58.61
58.I
59.4
55.9
67.0
41.3
55.5
10
66.6
66.0
65.3
58.2
57.8
59.3
55.1
67.1
51.3
55.2
11
64.2
63.3
62.2
56.1
55.1
55.71
52.6
63.6
43.5
52.0
12
66.1
65.2
64.4
57.4
57.0
58.0
54.7
66.1
38.0
53.0
13
63.1
62.0
63.8
515
53.5
58.7
50.7
63.7
41.71
47.8
14
54.6
52.0
64.4
35.11
40.5
61.0
#N A
59.5
-',�.Ij
34.1
I5
62.4
61.1
6/
52.2
51,9
60.5
49.3
62.0
40.9
43.7
16
57.9
56.1
fr
45.3
48.2
60.61
43.4
60.2
39.8
39.6
17
64.3
63.2
6 .
54.3
54.0
56.0
51.5
65.5
42.3
50.9
18
62.7
62.0
60.s
54.5
52.8
54.6
50.5
62.5
40.3
45.9
19
64AI
63.4
61.9
55.11
54.3
55.0
52.2
65.5
42.21
51.1
20
66.6
66.0
64.6
56.6
56.4
56.9
54.01
66.4
45.7
52.3
2I
65.2
64.6
63.1
55.9
55.3
57.2
53.3
65.6
43.5
51.8
22
66.0
65.1
63.9
57.3
56.3
57.0
53.1
66.7
41.0
55.1
23
65.9
65.1
64.1
57.9
56.6
57.9
53.6
67.2
#NIA
55.2
24
66-21
65.3
63.8
57.71
56.4
57.61
55.5
66.6
42.71
52.9
25
63.5
62.6
61.5
55.51
54.4
55.4
52.6
63.5
37.3
50.8
26
66.6
66.0
65.0
58.1
57.8
58.6
55.9
66.5
42.9
55.3
27
66.8
66.1
64.9
58.4
58.4
59.2
55.9
66.6
34.9
54.8
28
65.1
64.8
63.5
56.6
56.6
57.8
53.9
66.9
42.1
55.2
29
65.91
65.5
64.5
57.0
57.1
58.0
54.2
67.7
43.8
569
30
66.5
65.7
65.01
58.6
57.5
58.6
55.2
68.8
#NiA
58.1
31
65.9
66.0
64.8
57.7
58.3
59.7
55.6
66.4
43.7
55.0
Days
31
31
31
31
3I
31
30
31
27
31
En. Avg
65.3
64.5
64.0
56.6
56.1
58.1
53.8
65.9
43.51
53.5
N.--'A indicates insufficient data.
-7-
TABLE 4
DAILY CNI:L VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
February 2014
Dat.:
NMS Site
IS
I 2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
I 7S
8N
9N
ION
1
63.1
62.4
61.9
55.2
54.4
57.2
52.0
63.4
37.0
50.0
2
64.6
64.0
63.0
57.5
57.2
57.2
55.0
66.3
40.7
54.9
3
66.7
66.2
65.0
58.5
58.5
58.9
56.4
66.8
39.1
55.6
4
6-3
64.8
63.8
58.51
57.2
58.1
56.5
669
40.71
55.3
5
66.31
65.5
64.3
58.21
58.0
58.81
55.8
67.1
45.4
55.0
6
67.0
66.7
65.0
59.3
58.6
59.91
56.7
67.9
#N /A
58.0
7
66.7
66.2
65.2
58.7
58.6
59.7
56.7
67.2
28.2
56.3
8
64.2
63.5
62.5
55.8
56.1
56.7
53.9
64.4
42.4
juN:"A
9
66.6
65.9
65.0
58.8
58.6
59.5
56.1
67.3
47.11
48.0
101
66.9
66.0
65.21
58.9
58.5
59.7
56.0
67.3
49.8
48.2
11
66.0
653
64.1
56.2
56.9
57.91
54.2
66.6
39.4
51.1
12
66.2
65.7
64.1
57.0
56.9
58.0
54.1
66.7
45.3
45.6
13
66.8
66.21'
65.3
57.9
57.6
59.0
55.1
67.5
47.5
54.0
f 4
67.2
66.4
65.5
58.2
57.7
58.8
54.8
67.8
46.41
55.9
1 �
64.1
63.7
62.8
55.6
54.5
57.71
53.1
65.2
34.61
52.4
16
66.0
65.2
64.5
57.8
57.4
57.51
54.6
67.6
30.8
55.9
17
67.1
66.4
65.5
58.7
57.9
59.8
55.6
68.3
48.1
57.7
18
66.8
65.7
65.3
58.8
57.8
59.7
55.9
67.7
48.0
56.1
19
66.4
65.8
64.8
58.4
57.7
58.6
55.1
68.0
46.4
56.4
20
66.7
66.4
65.2
58.0
57.5
58.9
55.0
67.0
40.21
54.5
21
66.5
65.8
64.7
58.1
56.9
58.71
54.9
68.0
45.4
55.5
22
63.71
63.1
61.7
55.81
54.4
54.7
52.4
64.4
38.6
52.0
23
66.11
65.4
64.4
58.0
56.9
58.6
54.6
68.0
4I.5
54.9
24
66.7
65.9
65.4
58.7
57.8
58.9
55.7
67.8
39.6
57.3
25
66.4
65.7
64.4
58.8
57.5
58.4
55.5
68.0
38.91
57.1
26
66.5
65.6
64.71
58.7
57.71
59.1
56.2
67.6
44.8
56.9
27
67.6
66.6
65.9
59.3
58.9
60.2
56.5
68.1
44.2
56.8
28
`- "
66.1
64.7
59.3
58.5
59.0
56.9
69.5
#N /A
59.1
Days
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
26
27
En. Avg
�.6
64.5
58.1
57.5
58.7
55.41
67.31
44.3
55.4
#N/A indicate in u icie t data.
4-
TABLES
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
March 2014
Date
NMS Site
1S
I 2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
1
65.1
64.1
63.1
57.1
56.4
57.2
54.9
65.5
35.8
55.2
2
67.4
66.0
65.3
58.7
58.2
59.3
56.3
67.7
35.0
56.4
3
66.6
65.9
64.9
58.0
58.4
58.5
56.0
67.3
38.6
55.4
4
66.7
65.6
64.8
58.6
57.9
58.71
55.0
67.0
#N A
56.2
5
66.91
66.2
65.0
57.9
58.4
59.1
55.3
67.7
46.01
55.4
6
67.1
66.1
65.2
58.8
58.6
59.7
56.0
68.1
33.0
57.1
7
669
66.3
65.4
58.3
58.3
59.4
55.6
67.6
49.1
54.1
8
60.9
60.2
62.3
52.11
51.7
57.4
50.4
63.1
46.5
47.4
9
65.5
64.7
64.1
56.2
56.2
57.01
54.3
66.1
47.6
51.9
10
66.7
64.5
64.6
57.6
57.0
57.6
54.2
67.3
46.9
55.7
11
66.3
#N!A
64.6
58.2
57.2
58.6
55.3
67.3
48.1
54.1
12
66.4
#N..-'A
65.5
59.2
57.7
59.9
54.6
67.3
47.0
55.2
13
66.7
66.8
65.2
59.11
58.2
59.9
56.5
67.8
43.61
56.1
14
67.3
66.2
65.8
59.4
58.7
60.01
56.4
67.6
42.6
56.2
15
64.7
63.9
63.1
56.0
55.7
57.1
53.2
64.1
41.4
50.8
16
65.6
64.8
63.1
55.4
55.7
56.6
53.2
66.0
48.2
52.2
17
66.6
65.8
64.6
58.3
58.1
58.8
55.8
68.0
47.9
56.2
18
66.3
65.4
64.6
58.81
57.7
58.7
55.5
67.5
45.2
55.6
19
66.4
65.6
64.6
57.9
57.3
58.61
55.9
67.9
41.6
55.4
20
67.0
66.4
65.7
59.1
58.3
59.5
55.9
68.0
44.1
56.2
21
67.2
66.3
65.6
59.8
58.1
59.6
57.0
68.5
44.4
57.0
22
64.71
64.4
62.6
56.6
55.7
56.9
54.5
65.8
37.8
54.5
23
66.3
65.7
64.91
58.1
57.7
58.9
55.6
67.81
39.8
56.2
24
66.6
65.9
64.8
58.3
57.3
58.51
54.4
67.7
38.0
57.4
25
66.4
65.9
64.7
58.2
57.6
58.81
55.9
68.3
40.8
58.0
26
66.0
66.3
64.4
57.8
58.8
59.31
57.0
68.8
44.4
57.7
27
6731
66.9
65.6
59.21
58.6
59.7
56.6
67.9
46.51
56.5
28
6-.'l
66.5
65.4
58.7
58.2
59.4
56.5
68.1
40.4
55.9
29
6 .0
643
616
56.8
55.9
57.7
54.3
66.3
34.1
54.1
30
6 .
65.8
64.8
58.3
57.9
58.61
55.9
67.8
43.4
55.4
31
6
66.0
64.6
58.3
58.0
58.6
56.7
68.2
45.1
57.0
Days
1
29
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
En. Avgl
66.
y.6
64.7
58.11
57.6
58.7
55.5
67.4
44.61
55.6
INIA indicates insufi cie it data.
-9-
TABLE 6
MEASURED AW RAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE: LEVELS
Commercial Class A
January - March 2014
Camer
AC Type
Deps
NMS Site
1S
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
10
Ala k A
B 34
15
Average
97.2
95.5
97.2
89.3
89.9
90.8
86.8
95.1
N A
PTN A
Count
(14)
(14)
(14)
(14)
(14)
(14)
(14)
(1)
(0)
(0)
B
665
Average
925
92.1
88.8
82.0
83.8
84.3
80.9
89.2
79.9
80.9
Count
(637)
(606)
(636)
(629)
(636)
(601)
(634)
(23)
(3)
(3)
133
Average
98.0
97.0
96,6
88.2
88.8
89.0
85.1
90.3
77.9
77.7
Count
(126)
(124)
(124)
(118)
(122)
(110)
(125)
(7)
(1)
(1)
Amerrcdn
B
1055
Average
48 -2
96.9
964
88.6
88.4
89.3
85.7
90.9
79.6
80.5
Count
(989)
(954)
(993)
(%. 5)
( 986)
(916)
(993)
(48)
(I1)
(15)
B ?S2
1
Average
88.3
89.3
85.9
85.9
86.0
86.4
81.4
#Nr'A
#N!A
#N-A
Count
(I}
(1)
(I)
(1)
(I)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
D: Ita
A319
402
Average
94.8
94.1
93.5
86.6
86.0
86.7
82.5
91.4
80.2
81.4
Count
(363)
(343)
(364)
(354)
(364)
(334)
(358)
(32)
(10)
(6)
A320
5
Average
95.7
94.9
94.9
87.1
86.5
87.0
83.1
#N.-'A
PNr'A
#N-A
Count
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(5)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B -52
255
Average
95.7
94.7
94.0
87.3
86.6
87.5
84.1
90.7
79.1
78.8
Count
(230)
(222)
(234)
(229)
(230)
(209)
(229)
(16)
(4)
(5)
FedEx
A 06
63
Average
97.1
966
94.4
88,9
88.3
89.8
86.5
90.8
83.9
81.4
Count
(60)
(56)
(60)
(59)
(60)
(60)
(59)
(3)
(1)
(2)
Frontier Airlines
A319
248
Average
93.9
93.3
92.3
86.4
85.8
86.4
82.4
86.8
80.0
78.1
Count
(234)
(221)
(2371
(235)
(239)
(215)
(237)
(7)
(2)
(1)
Interjet
A320
131
Average
93.5
92.5
91.8
86.1
85.0
85.7
81.6
87A
76.7
#N. -A
Count
(126)
(124)
(126)
(125)
(126)
(120)
(121)
(4)
(1)
(0)
Southwest
B 3
2034
Average
91.1
90.8
89.1
84.2
83.7
84.8
82.4
88.9
78.7
78.5
Count
(1920)
(1848)
(1935)
(1923)
(1917)
(1842)
(1896)
(87)
(8)
(8)
B73.
103
Average
92.4
91.8
89.1
83.9
83 -3
84.7
82.7
90.2
76.8
76.8
Count
(98)
(90}
(97)
(98)
(97)
(87)
(95)
(3)
(1)
(I)
U ;-I -d
A3-0
522
Average
92.8
92. i
91.3
85,
84 -8
86,1
82.3
90.0
#N.:A
79.0
Count
1 (481)
(469)
(484)
(462)
(484)
(451)
(479)
(35)
(0)
(4)
B73
497
Average
95.4
94.4
42.7
85.3
85.0
85.8
82.8
91.1
79.7
79.9
Count
(464)
(448)
(471}
(467)
(463)
(448)
(466)
(23)
(5)
(9)
B 8
253
Average
96.6
95.5
93.)
863
85.9
86.9
83.9
94.2
83.5
82.0
Count
(227)
(215)
(229)
(224)
(226)
(210)
(225)
(20)
(7)
(5)
B7
53
Aver
94.5
93.7
92.8
8 ?.1
86.2
87.1
83.7
87.7
#N A
#NrA
Count
(49)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(50)
(41)
(50)
(3)
(0)
(0)
UP.3
B75F
50
Average
95.3
95.1
93.0
86.3
86,11
86.6
81.8
85.4
#N A
#N- A
Count
(47)
(44)
(47)
(41)
(47)
(47)
(46)
(3)
(0)
(0)
U.j Airways
A320
335
Average
93.3
93.0
90.5
84 -7
84.2
85.1
81.3
85.6
#N +A
77.7
Count
(316)
(306)
(319)
(302)
(317)
(294)
(306)
(16)
(0)
(1)
A321
104
Average
97.8
97.3
95.0
87.6
86.9
87.6
84.5
90.7
79.5
80.4
Count 1
(102)
(96)
(100)
(99)
(99)
(95)
(101)
(1)
(1)
(1)
$ _
4
Average
94."
93.7
91.1
84.4
83.3
83.1
80.4
#NrA
#N ?A
#N: A
Count
(4)
(3)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(2)
(0)
(0)
(0)
We )A
B736
I
Average
9'.8
92.8
93.1'
86.7
86.0
86.9
82.8
#N +'A
#N' -A
#N;A
Count
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1}
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
90
Average
95.2
94.2
94..-
88.7
87.4
8&61
83.1
89.2
#N.-'A
#N. A
Count
(87)
(94)
(87)
(87)
(87)
(84)
(85)
(3)
(0)
(0)
-10.
TABLET
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
January - March 2014
Camer
AC Type
Deps
NMS Site
15
2S
35
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9V
ION
SkyWe t Coml.
CR19
59
verage
aunt
90.7
(249)
89.4
(239)
89.0
(248)
79.6
(194)
79.5
(176)
83.1
(232)
79.6
(221)
87.8
(8)
78.1
(1)
WA
(0)
Soul 1w :t
B73
2054
Average
Count
90.3
(1947)
90.3
(1857)
88.6
(1452)
84.0
(1944)
83.3
(1942)
84.4
(1854)
82.0
(1917)
88.8
(88)
78.6
(9)
77.$
(2)
TABLE 8
M1r'.-'6URFD AVERAGF SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
January - March 2014
rr r
AC I'% -e
De i�.
NMS Site
[S
2S
3S
4S
SS
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
Sk: W, ,
CL60
2.Average
Count
8+4,3
(2}
83.9
(2)
86.4
(1)
75.7
(1)
79.8
(1)
77.5
(2)
#NfA
(0)
#NIA
(0)
#NIA
(0)
#NIA
(0)
J
437
Average
Count
88.1
(418)
87.5
(394)
86.9
(417)
79.7
(305)
80.0
(319)
81.6
(388)
79.1
(a 16)
86.8
(18)
77.2
(4)
#N ?A
(0)
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
January - March 2014
C rr- -er
AC Type
Dc ps
NMS Site
IS
29
3S
4S
SS
I 6S
75
8144
1 9N
I ION
G .ic .I :t4 it I
Jtt
24NAver-age
Count
88.5
(2669)
87.1
(2563)
89.3
(2581)
1 83.1
(1549}
82.51
(II65)
83.01
(2195)
82.1
(705)
865
(123)
79.0
(2)
80x6
(41
-11-
TABLE9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HIS:'ORY
Camcr
AC Typ
0
2011
1
Air Canada AC
A319
340
4
E190
52
AlarskaAir AS
B734
152
110
73
30
8737
6,839
7,435
6,138
5,673
1,335
B738
893
761
942
1,162
265
Am rican AA
B738
7,493
7208
7,667
8,658
2,109
B752
1,999
1,519
911
2
M082
4
4
Compass CP
E170
l,ri_
Continental CO
8737
4.646
4.124
8738
1,190
1.163
pelt% OL
A319
3,903
5.3481
3.436
?..s54
A320
372
36
31
m
8737
3,082
3,373
1,860
11
B738
433
87
55
14
B752
362
45
1,073
2,214
510
M D90
FLdFx FM
A306
J00
5061
508
506
126
310
4
2
2
2
Fmnticr Airlines F9
A318
284
88
369
17
A319
2396
2,751
2,368
2,278
497
320
6
2
Inte `et 40
A320
346
1.4901
262
Mesa Airlines YV
CRJ9
1437
720
626
418
Northwest NW
A319
162
A320
4
Sk West Comi. SC
CRJ9
584
2,034
519
thwest WN
8733
4
2
B737
'116
31,187
33,490
35,234
8,189
B738
1 132
391
201
., UA
A319
1,931
2,133
2,453
544
A320
4,419
4,554
4,229
498
8735
I
8737
447
3,786
3,836
995
B738
77
1.407
1,305
507
B739
2
B752
1.482
916
1,039
1,557
110
UPS 5X
B752
416
420
414
412
100
US Airways AW
A319
783
1,152
2,442
1.997
270
A320
F,333
1,086
1,485
888
402
A321
444
586
247
860
208
8733
1,632
1,349
8752
28
32
8
22
8
Virgin Ame6ca V
A319
104
A320
962
wesum WS
B736
B737
766
1,093
''
otal
$ 1,241 1
79,658 1
80.691 1
81,841
-12-
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircr t
Ynr
010
2011
2012
2013
2014
A 0
500
506
508
506
126
A310
4
2
2
2
A318
284
88
369
17
A319
4,788
11,186
10,379
10,082
2,117
A320
6,724
5,547
6,418
6,628
1,172
A321
444
586
247
860
208
B733
1,632
1.353
2
B734
152
110
84
73
30
B735
I
B736
2
B737
1;,553
47,332
46,467
45,484
10,699
8738
10,009
9,296
10,203
11,530
3,082
B739
2
B752
+.287
2,932
3,445
4,205
730
CRJ"
1.437
720
1,210
2,452
519
E170
1,352
E190
52
M
4
4
MD) 0
371
ota
81,241
79,658
80,691
81,841
I
-13-
TA L II
AIR CARRIv.R AV RAG DAILY DF PARTL-RI HISTORY
Carver
Air Canada AC
A319
_466
.005
E 190
.071
Alaska Air AS
B734
.203
.151
.115
.101
.1
137-
9.373
10.178
8.527
7.775
1.
B73o
1.225
1.049
1184
1.586
Anwrican AA
8738
10.266
9.8771
10.484
11.860
B752
2.737
2J082
1.235
M D82
.005
.005
om ass CP
El 70
1.847
anlinental CO
1373?
6.342
5.649
B738
1.652
1.597
Dcil. M
A319
5.353
7.321
099
A320
.504
.055
.C41
67"
4.219
4.627
2.538
.016
B736
_597
.115
U ?9
.019
B752
_499
.063
1.462
3.033
�..
_510
w f M
.685
.693
.694
,693
.173
, 1.,
_005
.003
.003
.003
Frontier Airlines B
A318
.384
.121
.503
.025
A319
3.559
3.770
3.235
3.121
.619
A320
.008
.003
40
A320
.473
2.041
.359
El'
Airlines YV
CRJ9
9 3
.986
.855
.573
cst NW
A319
^�
A320
Sk West ComL SC
CRJ9
.801
2.786
.710
Southwest WN '
B733
.005
003
B737
42.466
42.737
45,710
48.268
11.211
B738
.180
.537
_282
[, A UA
A319
2.605
2,627
2-916
3.364
_745
A320
5.553
6.077
6.240
5.797
.585
B735
8737
.608
5.178
5.249
11.64
8738
.I 10
1.921
1.792
.693
B739
.003
B752
2.033
1.252
1.418
2.132
.151
LIES 5X
B752
.570
.575
.566
.564
.137
US AirwayR AW
A319
1,071
1,5'5
3.331
2.732
370
A320
1.819
1.488
2.025
1,219
151
A321
_614
.805
_344
1.181
.285
B733
2.238
1.849
13752
.038
.044
.011
.030
.011
V�Tpn A rtiTioi% VX
A319
A320
WExiJct WS
B736
.003
B737
1.049
J2
1.000
.247
Io1a1
111.329
109,153
1W.270 1
112.126 1
25.597
-l��
NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY MEETING
Date: March 12, 2014
Time. 2:00 PM
Place: Eddie Martin Building
AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED:
Tonic Discussions and/or Comments and Ouestions
Cheryl Houle, a resident of Costa Mesa, attended the March 12, 2014 Noise Abatement
Quarterly Meeting. Ms. Houle was representing her townhouse association, and brought
forth questionslconcerns regarding jet fuel emission and possible changes to flight path.
Ms. Houle inquired on flight path deviations which have resulted in aircraft flying closer to
her neighborhood. She also mentioned her neighbors are concerned over the frequency of
flights, and possible addition of a new terminal with the Settlement Agreement. Eric Freed,
Manager, Access and Noise, informed Ms. Houle that typically air traffic flight tracks are
consistent. Eric also went into detail concerning the Settlement Agreement, the cap on total
operations (proposed projects and a] ternatives), and current negotiations in progress. Eric
informed Ms. Houle the Settlement Agreement signators are aiming for the Agreement to
remain the same the first 5 years, with proposed increases for the remaining term. Ms. Houle
also asked who decides on whether the Airport will increase operations or not. Eric informed
her that the environmental analysis will be available to the public in mid -May and will be
considered by the Board o.' Supervisors in late Summer 2014.
Ms. Houle inquired about air quality matters concerning the Airport. Eric explained to her
thii t the Noise Office does not handle air quality issues, and that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regulates aircraft emissions.
Ms. Houle also c %pressed concerned over the possibility of the curfew hours chap -in-, or
being removed from JWA. Eric informed Ms. Houle that there is strong interest by all
parties for the curfew to remain.
Ms. Houle stated she had recently read an article on new technology which will result in
quieter more fuel efficient aircraft. Eric informed her that both Boeing, and Airbus have new
aircraft that are being designed to improve performance in both of those areas.
- Is-
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
NAME
Cheryl Houle
Enc Freed
Bonnie Frisch
Nikolas Gaskins
Silvia 7avala
March 12, 2014
ORGANIZATION
Resident Co ,,ta Mesa
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
SNA/John Wayne Airport
SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA DE=PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (Cal i fort is Code of Regulations, Title 21,
chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6):
4.63 Arre� or .007 square miles
2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
71
3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
178 (based on 2.5 people per d.u.)
4. Identification of a, rcc aft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport toLether with
estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period:
B738 — 3,092 (arrival s + departures)
Total number of aircraft opera. ons during the calendar quarter:
6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter.
(Not mandatory)
61,148
19,567
7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Av,aLion Regulation (FAR) Part
36, Stage III:
(Not mandatory)
100%
8. F stimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
41,401
9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
180