HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1989 05 15MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
MAY 15, 1989
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:02 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Mayor Pro Tem Edgar.
II. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Chaplain Norman Williams of the Marine
Corps Air Station, Tustin.
III. ROLL CALL
Council Present:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Richard B. Edgar, Mayor Pro Tem
John Kelly
Earl J. Prescott
Council Absent:
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Others Present:
William A. Huston, City Manager
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Christine Shingleton, Dir./Community Development
Fred Wakefield, Acting Chief of Police
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Royleen White, Dir./Community & Admin. Services
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Daniel Fox, Associate Planner
rte+
Eric Haaland, Assistant Planner
j
Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk
Approximately 40 in the audience
IV. PROCLAMATIONS
1. PUBLIC WORKS WEEK - MAY 21-27, 1989
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Robert
Ledendecker, Director of Public Works. The Mayor commended the
City's Public Works Department as one of the most progressive
and well-managed public works departments in Orange County.
Robert Ledendecker accepted the proclamation on behalf of his
staff and invited the public to ask questions or voice concerns
regarding city improvements. Mr. Ledendecker presented a plaque
to the Mayor from the Southern California Chapter of the American
Public Works Association in appreciation of the City's continued
support. 84
2. KATHY WEIL, FORMER PLANNING
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Kathy Weil
honoring her seven years of service on the Planning Commission.
Kathy Weil thanked the Council for the opportunity to serve on
the Planning Commission and felt she had served the City during
a very exciting, historical time. 84
3. CHUCK PUCKETT, FORMER PLANNING
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Chuck Puckett
recognizing his service as a Planning Commissioner for six years.
Chuck Puckett expressed his appreciation to the Council. He said
the experience had been an enjoyable one and he hoped to serve
the City again in the future. 84
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 5-15-89
4. FOSTER CARE MONTH - MAY, 1989
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Ronald Nault,
the City's Finance Director and a foster parent.
Ronald Nault accepted the proclamation and encouraged others in
the community to participate in the foster care program. 84
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINATION ON EXPIRATION OF USE
PERMIT 87-6, EXXON ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES LICENSE AT 14082 RED
HILL AVENUE
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edgar, to continue this matter
at the June 5, 1989 City Council meeting.
Mayor Kennedy noted that a petition had been submitted requesting
Council deny the sale of alcoholic beverages at the Exxon
station, Red Hill and Nisson Road.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 81
2. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF VARIANCE NO. 89-1
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, gave a
background report citing reasons the Planning Commission had
denied Variance 89-1, a request to construct two new double-faced
billboards at heights of 60 and 65 feet, to replace three
existing single -faced billboards that would be removed as a
result of the I-5 Freeway widening at 1501 Nisson Road.
James Rourke, City Attorney, added that the applicant had not
claimed the type of hardship which State law required for
granting any kind of variance. The type of variance requested
by the applicant was a use variance which was expressly
prohibited by State law and there was no basis upon which the
Council could validly grant a variance or take any other action
to approve relocation of the billboards.
Council/City Attorney discussion followed regarding amendment of
the Tustin City Code as it pertains to billboards and what
parties would challenge existing laws.
Mayor Kennedy opened the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m.
The following members of the community spoke in favor of denying
the subject appeal:
Guido Borges, 2182 Dogwood Road, Tustin
Shirley Ruff, 14761 Foxcroft Road, Tustin
The following members of the community spoke in opposition to
denying the subject appeal:
Gary Mobley, 5 Park Plaza, Irvine (attorney representing
the applicant)
Eugene Tutt, 1501 Nisson Road, Tustin (applicant)
There were no other speakers on the subject and the Public
Hearing was closed at 7:45 p.m.
It was moved by Prescott seconded by Kelly, to overrule the
Planning Commission's decision and approve Variance No. 89-1.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar said he had a dilemma between making the
City of Tustin an attractive community, the exclusion of
billboards would contribute to that achievement, and he was also
a strong believer in property rights. He felt the issue of
whether or not the signs were properly grandfathered during
annexation gave a level of property rights to Mr. Tutt that
should not be ignored.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 5-15-89
VI.
Councilman Kelly believed that, for informational purposes, the
signs were necessary to inform the population of the Tustin Auto
Center and Tustin Marketplace. The billboards had become part
of the natural landscape and served a very useful purpose.
Mayor Kennedy stated the widening of the I-5 Freeway was the only
reason the billboards were under condemnation and the City had
allowed the billboards to remain after annexation until a change
in use or new use was requested. She noted the following reasons
for her opposition to the billboards: a use variance had been
identified as illegal by the City Attorney, the Council was not
permitted to grant a use that was in violation of the State law,
the Council would be in violation of State law by allowing a
billboard on a landscaped freeway, "spot zoning" could liable the
City and would set a precedent leading to extensive use of
billboards in Tustin, and decreased property values. She said
she would fight fiercely to defeat this variance.
Councilman Prescott thought Tustin was an All American City which
could accommodate various uses and, if the variance was granted,
would decrease the number of billboards in the City from four to
three.
A vote of 2-2 resulted in no action on the motion, Kennedy and
Edgar opposed, Hoesterey absent.
James Rourke advised the matter would be in abeyance for 60 days
from the date of the Planning Commission's action and, if no
further action was taken by the City Council, the Planning
Commission's decision would be final at the end of the 60 days.
81
PUBLIC INPUT
1. POLLUTION FROM THERMOELECTRICAL GENERATING POWER PLANTS
Roger Neilson, 190 Centennial Way, Tustin, addressed the Council
regarding pollution from thermoelectrical generating power plants
and his research of a submersible modular system which would
generate unlimited amounts of inexpensive electricity without
contributing to pollution.
Mayor Kennedy suggested he submit his research material to the
Federal Government and to the media.
2. PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON FIRST STREET
Mike Wendt, 530 W. First Street, Tustin, spoke regarding the
two-hour parking restriction imposed on the 500 block of First
Street and the hardship it caused for residents of Tustin Arms,
who were allotted only one parking stall per residence.
Mayor Kennedy directed the Public Works Department to investigate
the concern and submit a report to the Council.
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edgar, to approve the Consent
Calendar. The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
Sheila Pryor, a resident at 1282 Ranchwood Road, requested to speak
on Item No. 8.
1. APPROVED MINUTES - MAY 1, 1989, REGULAR MEETING
2. APPROVED DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,603,263.34
RATIFIED PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $222,982.75 50
3. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 89-4; CLAIMANT-CONSUELO BURGOS, DATE OF
LOSS -2/28/891 DATE FILED WITH CITY -3/6/89
Rejected subject claim for property damage of an undetermined
amount. 40
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 5-15-89
4. REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 89-9; CLAIMANT -ALLISON ALMOND, DATE OF
LOSS -3/21/89, DATE FILED WITH CITY -4/26/89
Rejected subject claim for personal injury and property damage
of an undetermined amount. 40
5. PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR PROVISION OF
REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES - 14TH YEAR HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Approved the subject contract. 45
6. PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR PROVISION OF SENIOR
CITIZEN CENTER FUNDS - 14TH YEAR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Approved the subject contract. 45
7. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13796
RESOLUTION NO. 89-58 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT 85-2 FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN, AS MODIFIED
BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND ADDENDA, IS ADEQUATE TO
SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 13796
AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS
REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Approved the Environmental Determination for the project by
adopting Resolution No. 89-58; and
RESOLUTION NO. 89-59 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 13796 TO AUTHORIZE A 108 DWELLING UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROJECT
LOCATED ON LOT 27 OF TRACT 12870
Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map 13796 by adopting
Resolution No. 89-59, subject to the conditions contained in
Exhibit A of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2587. 99
8. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13701 (AKINS DEVELOPMENT)
RESOLUTION NO. 89-61 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (FINAL EIR
85-2, AS MODIFIED BY SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPTED SUPPLEMENTS AND
ADDENDA) IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROGRAM EIR FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 13701 AND DESIGN REVIEW 88-45 AND ALL FEASIBLE
MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Approved the Environmental Determination for the project by
adopting Resolution No. 89-61; and
RESOLUTION NO. 89-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
13701
Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 13701, as recommended
by the Planning Commission, by adopting Resolution No. 89-62.
99
9. RESOLUTION NO. 89-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR COURT
LIAISON CLERK WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, SANTA ANA
OFFICE
Approved. Resolution No. 89-64 authorizing the City of Tustin
to enter into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol
to allow court liaison duties to be performed by the Tustin
Police Department for the California Highway Patrol. 45
10. CLETS/NCIC INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE SYSTEM
Authorized the expenditure of $35,000 for the purchase of the
California Law Enforcement Teletype System (CLETS) and
National Crime Information Center (NCIC) interface software
and hardware system from Public Safety Systems, Inc., 4401
Nicole Drive, Lanham, Maryland 20706. 82
11. PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
IMPROVEMENTS - 14TH YEAR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM
Approved the subject contract. 45
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 5-15-89
12. JAMBOREE ROAD BETWEEN TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AND CHAPMAN AVENUE
(RELOCATED)
Terminated the bid advertisement proceedings for the
construction of Assessment District No. 86-2 Improvements on
Jamboree Road between Tustin Ranch Road and Chapman Avenue
(Relocated), and authorized the reimbursement of the bid
package fee to each plan holder that purchased a set of plans
and specifications. 88B
1 13. REPLACEMENT OF PHOTO COPIER FOR FIELD SERVICES
Authorized the transfer of $3,500 from line -item operation
account number 010-400-4050-6240 to line -item operation
account number 010-400-4010-9820 for the purchase of a
replacement photo copier for the Field Services office. 86
14. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2, CONTRACTS FOR GAS LINE EXTENSIONS
Approved the Southern California Gas Company contract nos.
291156/T-54036 and 291157/T-54037 in the amounts of $6,166.27
and $12,276.99, respectively, and authorized the Mayor to
execute said contracts. 45
15. RESOLUTION NO. 89-65 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE /
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IMPROVEMENTS ON TUSTIN RANCH ROAD FROM BRYAN
AVENUE TO IRVINE BOULEVARD AND MYFORD ROAD FROM EL CAMINO REAL
TO IRVINE BOULEVARD
Adopted Resolution No. 89-65 accepting said work along Tustin
Ranch Road and Myford Road and authorized the recordation of
the Notice of Completion. 86B
16. JAMBOREE ROAD (MYFORD ROAD) BETWEEN MICHELLE DRIVE AND THE AT&SF
RAILROAD
1" Authorized a supplemental 1988-89 budget appropriation in the
amount of $171,000.00 as final payment on the Jamboree Road
(formerly Myford) street improvements between Michelle Drive
and the AT&SF Railroad. 45
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 - Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 13701
(Akins Development)
Sheila Pryor protested the building of two-story homes adjacent to
her property. As an avid gardener/beekeeper she was concerned with
the lack of sunlight in her yard due to the two-story homes and
questioned why one-story homes would not suffice.
Conrad Sick, representing Akins Development Company, said the project
had been determined consistent with the East Tustin Specific Plan
zoning requirements which allowed for the construction of two-story
homes.
Discussion between Council and Mr. Sick followed regarding mitigation
through landscaping, walls, and location of windows.
Mayor Kennedy said unfortunately the Council would be unable to
assist Ms. Pryor with her problem since housing developments of
various storied homes did exist. She suggested that Ms. Pryor and
the developer meet and hopefully reach a mutually agreeable
resolution.
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
1. AUDIT COMMITTEE - ORDINANCE NO. 1023
Mayor Kennedy said Ordinance No. 1023 would clarify the make-up
of the Audit Committee.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar suggested that individuals who were presently
serving on the Audit Committee remain members until their terms
expired.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 5-15-89
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 1023
have first reading by title only. The motion carried 4-0,
Hoesterey absent. Following first reading by title only of
Ordinance No. 1023 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar,
seconded by Kelly, that Ordinance No. 1023 be introduced as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1023 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TUSTIN CITY CODE
REGARDING THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar directed staff to incorporate the membership
language he previously stated prior to adoption of Ordinance No.
1023.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 27
IX. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None
X. OLD BUSINESS
1. STATUS REPORT - JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM
(JWA)l COALITION FOR A RESPONSIBLE AIRPORT SOLUTION (ORAS),
AIRPORT SITE COALITION (ASC) AND HELICOPTER OVERFLIGHT PROGRAM
TASK FORCE (HOPTF)
Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, gave a
status report as contained in the Community Development
memorandum dated May 15, 1989.
Mayor Kennedy requested the Council consider the appointment of
a Tustin resident to the CRAS Board of Directors.
Councilman Kelly commented it had taken over three years to
receive a noise monitoring report filled with questions. He was
very disappointed with the Van Houten report and wanted the City
to acquire its own sound monitoring equipment, hopefully within
the next year.
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar responded he was not disappointed with the
report and Mr. Van Houten's depth of involvement had enabled the
surfacing of some very penetrating questions that revealed
deficiencies in the John Wayne Airport Noise Study. He was very
pleased with the questions raised in the report and urged they
become part of the continued pressure on the airport forcing
them to provide answers.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file
subject report and staff to continue pressure on John Wayne
Airport with data from John Van Houten's report.
Mayor Kennedy noted that hiring a consultant of the caliber of
Mr. Van Houten was the City's power and she was satisfied with
the results of the report. She was open to the idea of acquiring
sound monitoring equipment at a future date but currently cost
was a major consideration.
Councilman Prescott suggested that the Marine Corps extend an
invitation to the Planning Commissioners to participate in a
helicopter flight over the Browning Corridor.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 101
2. ST. JEANNE DE LESTONNAC SCHOOL DRIVEWAY EVALUATION AND TRAFFIC
SIGNAL STUDY
Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, notified Council
that the St. Jeanne De Lestonnac School had requested this item
be continued to the June 5, 1989 City Council meeting.
Council/staff discussion followed regarding inbound/outbound
school vehicular movements occurring at Stoneglass, the
installation of a traffic signal at Stoneglass and the
requirement of a full joint use agreement between St. Jeanne's
School and the Stoneglass condominium association.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 7, 5-15-89
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Prescott, to continue this
item at the June 5, 1989 City Council meeting and staff to
apprise the school and the condominium complex of the pending
issues.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
94
XI. NEW BUSINESS
1. TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY LEGISLATION
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar gave a brief overview of each Senate Bill as
follows: (1) would provide for the capability of one agency
lending funds to another, (2) changes in text only would require
one hearing and one vote approval and (3) authority to pay
indebtedness through development fees.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to support Senate
Bills 1435, 1436 and 1437.
The following member of the community spoke in opposition to
diamond lanes:
Carole Bryant, 15500 Tustin Village Way, Tustin
Council discussion followed regarding placement of diamond lanes
in the transportation corridors.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 54
2. INITIATIVE MEASURE - LIMITATION OF CITY COUNCIL TERMS
James Rourke, City Attorney, reported that (1) it would not be
appropriate or advisable to direct the City Attorney to act on
behalf of any proponents of an initiative and (2) in his opinion
an initiative to limit terms of Councilmembers of a General Law
City could not be enacted by the electorate or the City Council.
The following member of the community spoke in opposition to the
above staff recommendation:
Carole Bryant, 15500 Tustin Village Way, Tustin
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar said he had a great amount of respect for the
voters and their ability to determine what was best for the City.
When an incumbent could no longer perform the duties, he believed
the voters would decide appropriately.
Councilman Kelly responded that if Mayor Pro Tem Edgar respected
the will of the voters then he should support the initiative
process. Councilman Kelly encouraged the proponent of the
initiative to proceed and he recommended that the City Attorney,
whose opinion had probably been drafted upon the recommendation
of the Council majority, not interfere with the initiative
process.
Councilman Prescott noted an earlier conversation with the City
Attorney regarding three General Law cities in Orange County
where term limitation initiatives had qualified for the ballot
'1 and he had requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney as
to why this was legal elsewhere. He stated that 98.5% of the
incumbents were reelected and the democracy would be more
representational and healthier if less incumbents were returned
to office.
It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Kelly, that in November of
1990 the City Council place on the ballot a referendum requesting
citizen approval of a non -retroactive, 12 -year City Council term
limitation.
James Rourke replied that he had no conversation with any
Councilmember before or after the writing of his unbiased opinion
other than the conversation noted by Councilman Prescott. In
reference to the other cities with term limitations, it was his
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 8, 5-15-89
understanding that the City Attorneys in those cities had some
doubt about the validity of term -limiting ordinances. Mr. Rourke
informed the Council that the California Court of Appeals, in an
opinion published this date, had expressly ruled and held that
a General Law City may not enact a term limitation ordinance and
what the Council cannot do, neither can the electorate do.
Mayor Kennedy commented, even though she would be adhering to the
legal advice, that during her terms of service with different
Councils, she had known Councilmembers so valuable to the _
community, in knowledge and energy, that it would be a tremendous
loss to limit their terms. She had also seen Councilmembers so
lacking in knowledge, understanding and dedication to the people,
they should not serve one term. Additionally, she believed the
two -term limit would give power to the professional staff, which
she did not feel was right and for those reasons was cautious
regarding term limitations.
As a substitute motion, it was moved by Prescott, seconded by
Kelly, to place on the ballot an advisory initiative changing the
City from General Law to Charter Law.
A brief Council discussion followed regarding the negative and
positive aspects of General Law vs. Charter Law.
A
and Edgar opposed, Hoesterey absent.
A vote of 2-2 resulted in no action on the original motion,
Kennedy and Edgar opposed, Hoesterey absent.
Councilman Prescott noted that the residents of Tustin could
circulate a petition to place on the ballot a request to change
the City from General Law to Charter Law. 38
XII. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - MAY 8, 1989
Councilman Prescott requested appeal of Item No. 3 of the
Planning Commission Action Agenda (Don Carter, D.D.S.).
Council concurred.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to ratify the remainder
of the`Planning Commission Action Agenda of May 8, 1989. The
motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 80
2. STATUS OF STREET NAMING COMMITTEE
Mayor Kennedy requested that "Townsmen" Drive be changed to
"Town" Drive.
Councilman Kelly was pleased that the names of living
professional golfers would be used.
Gerald Feldman, Chairman of the Street Naming Committee,
responded that the Committee had not changed their feeling about
using names of individuals that were living and also noted that
the professional golfers suggested were all males and female
golfers would be added.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to receive and file
subject report with notation of changes.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
3. COMMUNITY SERVICES PROJECT UPDATE
96
Mayor Kennedy commended the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day
Saints for their generous contribution of service to the
community.
It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file
subject report.
r
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 9, 5-15-89
Council concurred that Mrs. Linda Grau, Community Services
Specialist, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints, could
make a presentation to the City Council on June 5, 1989, if she
so desired.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 41
4. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SUPER STREET PROGRAM
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to support Edinger
Avenue/Irvine Center Drive/Moulton Parkway/Golden Lantern as the
candidate street for the next Super Street Program within the
County.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent.
5. NEWPORT AVENUE U-TURN MOVEMENTS
54
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file
subject report.
The motion carried 4-0, Hoesterey absent. 94
6. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF APRIL 30, 1989
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file
subject report.
The motion carried 3-1, Prescott opposed, Hoesterey absent. 50
XIII. PUBLIC INPUT - None
XIV. OTHER BUSINESS
I. PROCLAMATION FOR LUCIEN PROVOST, RETIRING TUSTIN MEADOWS MAIL
CARRIER
Councilman Kelly requested a proclamation be given to Lucien
Provost who recently retired after delivering mail to the Tustin
Meadows area for many years.
2. REMOVAL OF POLITICAL SIGNS
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar requested immediate removal of political
signs at First Street and Prospect Avenue.
Councilman Prescott also requested removal of a political sign
at Newport Avenue and the I-5 Freeway.
3. PROGRESS SCHEDULE FOR CALTRANS' COMPLETION OF WARNER BRIDGE
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar requested staff establish a schedule of dates
with Caltrans for when each visual phase of construction would
be completed. This schedule will assist in the monitoring of the
project to insure completion within the seven month time frame.
4. BUDGET WORKSHOP
Mayor Pro Tem Edgar asked for a status report on the budget.
William Huston, City Manager, stated a Budget Workshop date would
be agendized at the June 5, 1989 City Council meeting.
5. KEITH SHARON, REGISTER REPORTER, LEAVING AREA
Councilman Prescott noted that Keith Sharon, reporter for the
Register newspaper, was leaving the area. He commended Mr.
Sharon for his fine reporting while covering the City.
6. AGENDIZE APPOINTMENTS TO TUSTIN WATER CORPORATION BOARD
Councilman Prescott requested agendizing for June 5, 1989 City
Council meeting, appointments to the vacancies on the Tustin
Water Corporation Board of Directors.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 10, 5-15-89
7. MISS TUSTIN PAGEANT
Councilman Prescott noted the Miss Tustin Pageant would be held
on May 20, 1989, and invited everyone to attend.
S. REPAIR OF WROUGHT IRON BARRIER/EL CAMINO AND NEWPORT AVENUE
Councilman Prescott reported the wrought iron barrier surrounding
a tree at the northwest corner of E1 Camino and Newport was in
need of repair.
i
9. POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION OF SPORTS ARENA IN SANTA ANA
Mayor Kennedy informed Council of the possible construction of
an indoor sports arena, approximately 1 mile from Tustin's border
on Edinger Avenue, and the potential traffic impact upon the
community.
10. USE OF MOTELS AS APARTMENTS
Mayor Kennedy requested staff submit a status report on motels
within the City being used as apartments.
11. LIVING TREASURE AWARD
Mayor Kennedy clarified that the Living Treasure award program
would be agendized at the June 5, 1989 City Council meeting.
XV. ADJOURNMENT
At 9:20 p.m., the meeting recessed to the Redevelopment Agency and
then adjourned to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, June 5, 1989,
at 7:00 p.m.
MAYOR
CITY CL RK