HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTAgenda Item 6
Reviewed.
AGENDA REPORT Gty Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 2014
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
SUMMARY:
This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly
Report for the second quarter of 2014. The average noise level measured at Tustin's
monitoring sta.ion (NMS 1ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way
(Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters during this second quarter reporting
period. Average noise levels during the first quarter were well below the City, County, and
State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No Fiscal Impact.
CORRELATION TO THE' STRATEGIC PLAN:
Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Report
falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional
relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within
and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, in this instance, on matters of
airport traffic and noise.
JWA Noise Report
October 7, 2014
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport preps res a
Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their
website. Attached is the quarterly report for the second quarter of 2014, which includes
the months of April through June. An overview of the information contained within the
JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels, and an analysis of noise
complaints.
Measured Noise Levels
Aircraft noise Is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings primarily due to
engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many
other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather -- in
bad weather engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder
than on clear days; routes; non - scheduled operations which could include military or
private aircraft; emergencies; and, weight -- a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate
of ascent.
During the second quarter of 2014, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on
Beneta Way was 55.7 dB. This is .8 dB higher than the average of the previous quarter
(January through March 2014). The average noise level for this quarter is similar to the
average from the previous four quarters, which was 54.9 dB. Figure 2 provides a
visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month dur,ng the second quarter of 2014.
It can be seen that the noise levels in Tustin are consistently below the average City,
County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL, with the month of May displaying the lowest
average noise level overall.
70
60 i
So
40
LU
Z 30
V
20
10
Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL)
in Tustin - April through June 2014
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Date
Figure 2
April
May
June
-----Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB)
JWA Noise Report
October 7, 2014
Page 3
Noise Complaints
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and
complaints from local citizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County
monitoring area, noise complaints decreased by 37.5 percent during the second quarter of
2014 in comparison to the first quarter.
During the second quarter of 2014, there were five (5) Tustin area complaint calls,
compared to four (4) complaints during the previous quarter. Typically, an increase in
complaints is seen during warmer months when people spend more time outside, and
therefore aircraft noise may be more noticeable.
Tustin staff has outreached to John Wayne Airport to gather further details on the nature of
the complaints made by residents. The breakdown of the five (5) complaints from the
second quarter of 2014 are as follows: One (1) complaint was due to aircraft noise either
late at night or early in the morning; three (3) complaints were due to aircraft flying low and
loud; and, one (1) complaint was regarding helicopter noise.
To provide an understanding of the trend in Tust:n area complaints throughout the years, a
chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five years is displayed below
(Figure 3). Generally, there is a noticeable decrease in noise complaints during either the
first and fourth quarters, which further supports the theory that a decrease in complaints
tends to occur during the cooler months of fall and winter. Overall, the number of
complaints has not reached more than twelve (12) complaints in a single quarter during
this five -year reporting period.
P.'.
r-
E
Z
14
12
10
s
6
4
2
0
Noise Complaints - Tustin
010 010 0 010 oti 01 01 011 0 01ti 01 01ti 0y's, 0 0ti3 013 e 01�
titi ti \ti 3�ti bNT 1,T ITT 4" ati 11ti ryry �,�'� ISST 1\T 1r' KV a-\ti ti�T ti \ti
0- a 0. a a a a a a a o- a a 0 a a C- a
Quarter /Year
Figure 3
JWA Noise Report
October 7, 2014
Page 4
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department w ll continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless
otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in
John Wayne Airport's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. Publ.c
comments expressed at the June 11, 2014, meeting are attached as part of the quarterly
report. Three residents from Anaheim Hills attended this meeting and generally expressed
their concerns regarding the flight path of the aircraft. The next quarterly meeting will be
held on December 10, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. in the John Wayne Airport Administrative Office
located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa.
Adrianne DiLeva- Johnson
Sr. Management Assistant
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attrachmen':
John Wayne Airport Noise Aba,ement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2014, through June 30, 2014
JWA Norse Report
October 7, 2014
Page 5
ATTACHMENT
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for
April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014 (Second Quarter)
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6:
Divi ,,ion of Aeronautics
Noise Standards
Submitted by:
Alan L. Murphy
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
INTRODUCTION
This is the 166th QLktrterly Report submitted by the County of Oran,-_-e in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter
2.5, SuhChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for
defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Pro. - am has established F uidelines i n the California State Noise Standard to control
residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those
guidelines. residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an avera;;c Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent
remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) Iocated in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irv: ne to
measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS-IS: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Dave, Newport Beach
NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -FN: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Sant, Ana
NMS -5S: 324 %= Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -ION: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure I shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July I, 2013 - June 30, 2014).
The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre -Greve Associates, Inc., in consulta• ion with John
Wayne Airport. CNI:L values measured for the period and current di, -it.zed land use informs ton wL re
utilized to calculate the land area acreares number of residences and estimated number of people w t iin
the "Noise Impact Area ".
JOHN WANE AIRPORT
Noise Monitoring Stations NMS)
Location Map
vX�
I IRS
-2-
�•: -. YW /`�•y. - �IYI "� � k�,l {�r� � `� V 4 R� "y� - � •'�,� mot' �, � * 1 \
..r!�� JS•SE.I•x � ' #" �', « �, �F�j ��' � �5 /�O O P err
lip
or
- /n
r �! �'I� .�^�`,'.��,.5r y * , +�} �f,'l�r�.- ��jC1�•`;y ��� * "`ts , �?j ff �j,�5:
4,r J•* � 1�� • , \fit. _ � _R i r..�+7 ' ` 'r � �' . 1'' f. � . .' � �
��
y�■rr � /a �,�� --� V �• � 4� � J � ry + �� 'r
kyy ��• 1 �F'•T�.�v.F y } -7I, n�r^. +
.� YY `��'555551', �"h•i t it .'4�' ' c r �i ;, 1 ,. ]� ,.
Shy
♦ ..ate 'Y ? � �.�r� `'a -ii „' "-
�+ j � r •
Irk •. ►' �♦Y�' � ��,� � `'!;~ ,� •ti •`j r '.�. 1 ,• ;..
lip N
et
� \' f � ¥r: ry�.� -ry •• ' +• rl+.F 'Yee ~ t� '�/ ' [• r ��'k1rl��� +J� �w�'�r� i` ����Y �`^1�{
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count
histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
TABLE I
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
April -June 2014
Period
Air Carriers
GA Jet (1)
Total
Operations (2)
Average Daily
Jet Operations
Jet
Prop
April
6,732
0
2,039
22,550
292
May
6,924
0
2,178
23,367
293
June
6,973
01
2,262
23,180
307
Second Quarter
20,629
0
6,479
69,097
297
Twelve Months
07/01/13 - 06/30/14
82,058
0
25,003
252,176
293
NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the J WA noise monitor
stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon mcords provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve monn Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNE.L) average values for
each monitor station are shown in Ttible 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5.
Insufficient data is indicated by " #N /A" entres in each table.
Averaf,e Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SI .NEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet
aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through S.
ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM
Four hundred eir .hteen residences in the Santa Ana Hei ghts area hiive been sound attenuated and an aviLration
easement reserved throuf h the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009.
The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were
acoustically insulated, an aigation easement reserved and then resold. Amonv these County acquired
homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avgation easements were
reserved, and ;he land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of464 residences in the Santa Ana
Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance
and Acou „tical Insulation Programs. Seventy -one dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise
Impacted Area” (within 65 dB CNEL contour).
TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (April 1. 2014 - June 30.2014)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaint* from local
citizens and al I other sources. During April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014, the Of] ice received 337
complaints from local citizens. This is a 37.5% decrease prom the 539 complaints received last quarter. It is
an 11.6% incre..se from the 302 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the
distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities.
-4-
Note:
FIGURE: 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 `J5 ob 65 70 75 80 65 90
Number of Complaints
• 76 ofthe 86 complaints submitted from Irvine were from one household.
• All complaints submitted from Mission Viejo were from one household.
Anaheim F-Ws
Arch Beach Heights
Balboa Island
Balboa Peninsula
Corona del Mar
Costa Mesa
Cowan Heights
Crystal Cove
Dover Shores
Eastbluff
FountEin Valey
Ga den Grove
Harbor Cove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
a
Lade a Ranch
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
Laguna Niguel
Lido Isle
Mission Viejo
Newport Beach
Newport Coast
Newport Heights
Oran, le
Santa Ana
Santa a na HF- ht
Trabus o Canyon
Tust n
We, -Jff
Note:
FIGURE: 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 `J5 ob 65 70 75 80 65 90
Number of Complaints
• 76 ofthe 86 complaints submitted from Irvine were from one household.
• All complaints submitted from Mission Viejo were from one household.
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 07/01/13 through 06/30/14
Values in db at Each Site
Period
NMS Site
1
2S
3 :3
4�
5S
6S
1 71,
8N
9N
] ON
Jul 2013
66.6
65.8
65.1
57.9
57.5
58.6
54.7
67.6
43.1
55.4
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
Aug 2013
66.5
65.8
65.0
57.7
56.9
58.4
54.3
67.5
43.4
55.3
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
Sep 2013
66.0
65.3
64.3
57.2
56.5
57.8
54.1
66.8
43.8
52.5
# Days
30
30
30
22
30
+0
30
30
28
30
Q-3 2013
66.4
65.6
64.8
57.6
57.0
58.3
54.4
67.3
43.4
54.6
# Days
92
92
92
84
92
92
92
92
89
92
Oct 2013
65.9
65.3
64.5
57.4
56.7
58.6
54.7
66.9
42.4
54.1
0 Days
31
31
31
11
31
31
31
31
29
31
Nov 2013
65.7
64.9
64.2
57.3
.,6.3
58.E
54.4
66.5
44.3
54.3
: . Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
29
30
29
30
Dec 2013
65.4
64.5
64.2
56.9
56.1
58.6
55.7
66.5
44.9
53.8
0 Days
31
31
31
31
31
+I
31
31
31
31
Q -4 2013
65.7
64.9
64.3
57.2
56.4
58.6
55.0
66.6
44.0
54.1
Days
92
92
92
92
92
92
91
92
89
92
Jan 2014
65-3,
64.5
64.0
56.6
56.1
58.1
X3.8
65.9
43.5
53.5
# Days
31
31
31
51
31
31
30
31
27
31
Feb 2014
&.3
65.6
64.5
58.1
57.5
58.7
'; 1.4
67.3
44.3
55.4
9 Day
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
'6
1:7
Mar 2014
66.3
65.6
64.7
58.1
57.6
58.7
55.5
67.4
44.6
_ . 7.6
# Day
31
29
31
31
31
31
31
3I
+0
;1
Q -12014
66.0
65.2
64.4
57.6
57.1
58.5
55.0
66.9
44.1
54.9
# Days
90
88
90
90
90
90
89
90
83
89
Apr 2014
6-9
65.3
64.7
57.7
56.8
58.7
55.1
67.0
43.6
55.5
# Days
30
30
27
30
30
30
22
30
"'9
30
May 2014
65.7
65.0
64.3
57.6
56.8
58.4
#N /A
66.9
44.-
55.2
# Days
51
31
31
31
31
31
0
31
i0
31
Jun 2014
67.0
6s.9
65.3
58.6
57.8
59.0
56.-
67.8
43.6
56.3
# Days
-.0
30
30
30
30
30
2
30
29
30
Q-2 2014
66.2
65.4
64.8
58.0
57.2
58.7
55.7
67.2
43.8
55.7
# Days
91
91
88
91
91
91
44
91
88
91
Q -3 2013 thru
Q -2 2014
Total
66.1
65.3
64.6
57.6
56.9
58.5
54.9
67.0
43.9
54.9
# Days
365
363
362
357
365
365
316
365
3491
364
Q-2 2013 thru Q -1 2014 (Previous 4 Quarters)
Total
1
66.1
65.3
64.5
57.6
57.0
58.5
54.9
67.1
43.8
54.9
Days
365
363
365
353
365
J641
ibil
65
341
364
Change from Previous 4 Quarters
o.0 0.0
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
-0.11
0.11
0.0
-h -
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
April 2014
Date
NMS Site
IS
I 2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
1
65.7
65.6
63.9
57.5
57.7
57.8
56.5
68.0
39.5
56.9
2
65.8
65.9
64.4
57.7
58.3
58.3
56.4
67.7
45.0
56.9
3
67.4
67.1
66.0
58.9
58.8
60.1
57.1
68.0
40.1
56.6
4
66.2
65.9
64.5
58.3
57.9
58.71
56.5
68.2
43.7
56.6
5
64.41
64.0
63.3
57.1
5 .'
57.1
54.6
65.3
41.0
54.2
6
66.0
65.3
64.4
57.3
57.0
58.6
54.8
66.5
50.1
52.0
7
65.9
65.0
64.4
56.9
St .t,
57.6
54.5
66.2
43.6
53.6
8
65.4
65.3
64.3
56.3
55.2
56.3
53.2
66.1
44.81
53.5
9
66.0
65.9
64.6
56.1
55.5
56.61
51.3
66.9
41.21
53.8
10
66.4
65.6
64.3
56.2
55.5
57.3
51.9
67.6
37.7
54.0
11
-
65.9
65.0
58.2
56.5
58.0
54.1
68.2
42.9
56.7
12
64.7
63.7
62.6
57.11
54.8
57.1
54.1
65.7
#NIA
55.4
13
6+' 0
65.4
64.3
58.3
56.7
58.7
55.6
67.9
35.8
56.9
14
6.
66.2
64.9
57.2
56.4
57.7
55.0
67.1
47.1
54.1
15
66.0
65.5
64.2
56.7
56.0
57.6
54.0
67.7
38.9
56.9
16
664
65.7
64.9
58.7
56.7
58.7
55.4
67.9
45.5
56.3
17
61
65.7
64.3
59.3
57.6
58.8
55.2
68.0
39.1
57.4
18
6 .
65.6
#N /A
59.8
569
A0.1
56.21
67.1
43.3
55.6
19
6, .
64.0
#N /A
56.9
56.0
X7.0
54.0
64.3
37.9
52.3
20
6 .
65.4
#NIA
57.7
57.7
58.4
55.1
67.2
43.7
55.1
21
66.7
66.2
65.8
57.9
58.0
58.9
55.4
67.7
38.81
56.2
22
66.2
65.8
65.1
58.9
58.0
59.21
55.7
67.3
41.21
56.0
23
66.5
65.9
65.1
58.7
57.6
58.7
#NIA
67.4
46.2
56.1
24
66.8
66.1
65.3
58.7
58.3
59.2
#NIA
67.6
40.9
56.5
25
66.7
66.2
64.7
59.6
58.4
59.3
#NIA
68.8
38.7
58.3
26
64.6
.6
63.9
57.6
55.7
58.2
#N /A
65.1
43.6
53.9
27
66.4
.7
65.0
58.7
57.6
59.0
#N /A
67.8
40.71
57.1
28
-7.0
j.1
65.7
58.3
56.7
59.3
#N /A
67.0
42.0
55.0
29
.7
)2.7
65.5
40.7
45.9
61.4
#NIA
60.5
46.4
38.4
30
` .7
51.6
65.8
47.6
45.4
61.2
#NIA
60.5
46.4
43.1
D y
30
30
27
30
30
30
22
30
29
30
vgj
65.9
6�. 31
64.7
57.71
56.8
58.71
55.11
67.01
43.61
55.5
N/A indicates insufficient data.
-7-
TABLE4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
May 2014
Date
NMS Site
1 {x
I 2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
l ON
1
61.1
61.6
62.5
52.5
53.0
57.8
#N /A
65.6
40.8
50.0
66.0
65.2
64.1
56.3
55.3
57.0
4NIA
66.5
38.1
53.8
3
63.9
63.3
62.2
55.6
54.0
55.3
#NIA
64.0
36.9
53.5
4
66.2
65.3
64.9
58.21
56.9
57.9
#NIA
67.3
43.6
55.7
5
66.11
65.1
64.6
58.9
57.3
58.7
#N /A
67.8
35.2
57.6
6
65.5
64.9
64.3
57.8
58.0
58.4
#N /A
67.1
32.7
56.4
7
66.4
65.6
64.8
59.1
57.9
59.0
#NIA
68.1
47.1
57.5
8
67.0
66.3
65.1
59.0
58.2
59.6
#N /A
67.0
49.01
55.2
9
67.2
66.5
65.5
59.51
58.5
59.8
#NIA
67.8
48.1
55.9
10
64.2
63.6
62.5
56.41
55.9
56.5
#N /A
65.4
41.3
54.4
11
65.5
65.1
64.2
56.71
56.6
58.8
#NIA
66.8
44.3
53.7
12
63.1
63.3
62.8
53.71
54.0
57.4
#N /A
64.9
43.7
51.5
13
61.6
61.1
64.9
50.81
51.7
60.6
#N /A
62.9
47.61
45.9
14
61.81
62.1
62.9
52.3
52.6
57.9
#N /A
66.2
44.5
52.2
1 �
61.9
64.4
63.1
54.7
54.9
56.0
#NIA
65.7
42.6
51.8
16
66.0
65.3
64.3
56.6
56.0
57.4
#N /A
67.3
47.0
55.3
17
64.7
64.0
63.2
56.51
55.0
56.4
#NIA
64.9
42.0
53.5
18
66.8
66.1
65.5
59.2
58.4
59.2
#N /A
67.7
45.9
56.1
19
66.6
65.9
64.8
59.3
57.8
59.1
#N /A
68.0
34.7
57.2
20
65.91
65.7
64.4
58.2
57.3
58.4
#NIA
67.4
38.3
56.4
21
66.41
65.9
64.7
58.9
58.1
59.3
#NIA
68.0
41.21
56.0
22
67.31
66.6
65.9
60.3
58.7
60.4
#N /A
68.4
46.71
57.8
23
67.01
66.3
65.3
59.0
58.8
59.6
#N /A
68.0
50.91
56.3
24
64.9
63.7
63.4
57.0
55.9
56.7
#NIA
64.2
#NIA
54.0
25
64.5
63.5
62.8
56.4
56.3
57.0
#N /A
65.5
31.8
54.7
26
66.7
65.5
65.1
58.4
57.5
58.8
#NIA
67.7
4; .0
55.3
27
66.8
65.9
65.4
58.6
57.4
59.2
#N /A
68.2
4:
56.4
28
66.1
65.3
64.4
58.4
57.2
58.4
#N /A
67.4
3t-.Ol
56.3
29
66.7
65.7
65.0
58.7
58.2
59.5
#N /A
67.6
40.4
55.9
30
66.7
65.9
64.9
58.1
58.2
58.9
#N /A
67.6
4-.-1
56.1
31
6 .
63.8
63.1
56.1
- -
56.2
#NIA
64.3
30.11
3.6
Days
31
31
31
31
1
31
ol
31
0
31
En. Avg
65.71
65.0
64.31
57.6
/A
55.2
NIA indicates insufficient data.
-8-
TABLI ' 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
June 2014
Date
NMS Site
IS
I 2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
I 7S
8N
9N
ION
1
66.61
65.8
65.0
57.7
57.3
58.2
#NIA
68.2
28.7
58.2
2
66.51
65.6
64.8
57.6
57.7
58.7
#NIA
68.0
44.2
55.8
3
66.5
65.5
64.8
57.8
57.0
57.7
4N /A
67.2
41.4
55.5
4
66.1
65.4
64.7
57.31
57.2
56.5
#NIA
67.0
44.9
54.6
5
66.6
65.7
64.8
58.3
57.8
58.0
#N /A
67.9
51.5
56.3
6
66.9
65.9
65.0
58.7
57.9
58.1
#N /A
68.2
44.1
57.2
7
65.1
63.9
63.3
56.8
56.3
56.5
#NIA
65.7
32.0
55.0
8
67.2
66.2
65.7
58.8
58.3
59.5
4NIA
68.2
41.11
56.1
9
67.5
66.1
65.6
57.9
57.2
57.8
53.7
67.9
43.51
57.1
10
67.2
65.9
65.2
58.9
57.7
58.7
54.9
68.2
29.1
57.7
11
67.3
66.3
65.5
59.0
58.6
59.7
56.5
68.0
34.2
56.7
12
67.7
66.7
66.0
59.2
59.1
59.7
56.4
68.4
44.8
56.4
13
67.9
66.6
66.3
60.11
59.2
60.1
56.9
68.5
38.4
56.8
14
65.9
64.6
64.2
57.2
56.8
58.0
54.8
66.4
35.3
55.7
15
66.7
65.7
65.0
58.6
57.9
59.1
55.6
68.4
#NIA
57.9
I6
67.7
66.5
65.9
59.4
58.8
59.6
56.7
68.5
35.7
56.2
17
67.5
66.0
65.8
59.7
58.2
60.0
56.8
67.4
39.8
56.4
18
67.6
66.4
65.9
59.3
58.3
59.0
56.2
68.3
47.8
56.5
19
66.9
66.4
65.6
58.2
58.0
59.0
57.6
67.5
40.4
54.3
20
67.2
66.1
65.7
58.8
58.0
59.7
56.8
67.9
46.1
54.7
21
65.3
64.3
63.8
57.3
56.2
57.7
53.7
66.1
40.1
54.4
22
66.91
65.9
65.5
59.01
57.8
59.6
56.2
68.4
44.5
56.8
23
67.51
66.1
65.8
59.51
58.5
60.1
56.8
67.9
35.3
56.0
24
67.71
66.9
66.1
59.31
58.7
60.1
56.7
67.4
38.4
56.0
25
67.5
66.6
66.1
59.3
58.5
59.8
56.8
68.3
50.0
55.9
26
67.7
66.6
66.3
58.6
58.5
60.11
57.2
68.2
42.41
57.0
27
67.3
66.1
65.E
59.8
57.7
59.9
57.0
68.4
43.31
56.7
28
65.61
64.4
1
57.5
55.7
58.4
56.0
66.4
39.8
54.8
29
66.5
6.7
.9
57.7
56.6
58.7
56.7
67.8
33.71
56.8
30
67.5
66..,
v .7
58.7
56.5
59.0
54.8
67.7
44.51
55.4
Days
30
- 301
301
30
30
30
22
30
29
30
En. Avg
67.0
.91
6,.-1
58.61
57.8
59.0
56.2
67.8
43.6
56.3
#N /A indicates insufficient data.
.g_
TABLE: 6
MI ASIIRI D AVI.RAGh SINGLE LVFNTNOISI- LXPOSURI LEVELS
Commercial Class A
April - June 2014
C-irrier
AC Type
P Deps
NMS Site
I1�
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
11a�.ka Ac
B734
5
Average
97. •
95.6
97.6
88.9
91.0
91.2
88.6
AN.-A
3N.:A
NN-7
Count
(5)
(4)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(5)
(2)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B131
508
Average
91.8
91.5
88.7
81.8
83.7
84.1
81.0
89.0
79.7
79.6
Count
(481)
(469)
(456)
(476)
(448)
(434)
(218 )
(24)
(8)
(3)
B7s8
324
Average
98.0
96.8
96.6
88.1
8$.7
89.0
85.5
91.6
79.6
81.3
Count
(302)
(303)
(296)
(297)
(291)
(276)
(178 )
(15)
(6)
(6)
Amc.rcLan
B738
1113
Average
98.3
97.1
96.5
88.8
88.5
89.4
86.1
90.9
80.5
80.5
Count
(1036)
(1024)
(994)
(1016)
(962)
(943)
(536 )
(63)
(29)
(28)
Ddt,
A319
436
Average
94.8
94.1
93.5
86.9
86.0
86.8
82.9
90.4
79.9
82.5
Count
Q9 5)
0 841
(377)
(�84)
(362)
(358)
(197)
(36)
(12)
(7)
A320
4
Average
95.2
94.1
93.7
88.1
86.5
86.7
83.8
#N,'A
=N- A
#NIA
Count
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
0
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B73
I
Average
944
94.8
93.1
87.1
88.2
88.7
86.7
#N. A
?iN.'A
#NA
Count
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(E)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B75
283
Average
95.8
94.8
94.2
87.7
$6.9
87.9
84.4
90.0
80.9
80.7
Count
(257)
(257)
(246)
(260)
(239)
(229)
(126)
(19)
(13)
(7)
FedEX
AX,
64
Average
96.4
95.9
94.0
87.9
88.1
89.1
85.6
88.8
77.2
78.3
Count
(62)
(60)
(60)
(60)
(61)
(60)
(32)
(2)
(I}
(2)
Frontier Airlirbes
A319
325
Average
43.8
932
92.2
86.4
85.6
86.4
82.6
86.8
79.9
79.1
Count
(305)
(300)
(7 93)
(301)
(288)
(2) 73)
(139)
(18)
(4)
(2)
inteqL t
A3 0
81
Average
93.9
93.0
N.9
86.6
85.1
86.3
82.4
85.8
ALMA
#NIA
Court
(77)
(77)
(il)
(75)
(73)
(68)
(38)
(3)
(0)
(0)
Southwe• t
B737
2003
Average
91.2
90.9
89.5
84.4
83.9
85.1
83.1
89.1
79.5
79.5
Count
(1886)
(1853)
(1809)
(1887)
(1796)
(1759)
(938 )
(90)
(25)
(4)
3738
160
Average
92.7
92.3
89A
84.5
84.0
85.3
82.7
89.4
80.2
78.7
Count
(147)
(144)
(139)
(14 5)
(130)
(134)
(47)
(11)
(5)
(1)
+ A
A320
610
Average
92.9
92.3
91 A
85.6
85.1
86.3
829
89.8
79.5
79.3
Count
(559)
(549)
(535)
(521)
(525)
(521)
(252)
(43)
(6)
(5)
13737
541
Average
95.6
94.5
93.0
85.9
85.4
86.3
83.4
90.8
80.2
79.8
Count
(503)
(506)
(489)
(500)
(475)
(475)
(250)
(27)
(10)
(9)
6738
220
Average
96.7
95.4
93.7
86.7
86.l
86.9
84.0
92.0
85.9
80.1
Count
(202)
(199)
(192)
(200)
(191)
(185)
(113 )
(15)
(3)
(4)
B752
12
Average
93A
93.1
92.5
87.4
86.0
87.1
82.9
AN:'A
#Nr'A
#NIA
Count
(12)
(12)
(II)
(12)
(10)
(I1)
(6)
(0)
(0)
(0)
U+ .,
B752
51
Average
95.3
94.9
92.9
85.7
85.4
86.3
82.1
84.2
#N: A
#NIA
Count
(49)
(47)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(46)
(23)
(2)
(0)
(0)
U5 Airways
A320
359
Average
93.2
93.0
90.8
85.0
84.5
85.1
81.9
86.0
79.4
79.8
Count
(340)
(334)
(326)
(315)
(317)
(309)
(157 )
(15)
(1)
(1)
A321
90
Average
98.0
97.3
94.7
87.5
86.6
87.6
84.6
90.2
79.3
84.1
Count
(83)
(83)
(79)
(80)
(80)
(76)
(41)
(6)
(3)
(3)
B752
4
Average
93.1
93.0
89.1
81.3
83.6
86.1
81.3
#NIA
#NIA
#NIA
Count
(4)
(4)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(4)
(2)
(0}
(0)
(0)
we_det
737
9E
Average
94.9
93.9
94.5
88.5
87.0
88.3
82.8
90.3
76.1
#N .'A
Count
(87)
(87)
(83)
(85)
(83)
(79)
(42)
(4)
(1)
(0)
.10-
TABLET
ML.ASURI.D AVE RAG1- SINGLE EVENT NOISI IXPOSt RE LFVE LS
Commercial Class E
April - June 2014
Currier
AC. Type
I)cps
NMS Sit:
I
2S
is
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
S&yWest Coml.
t R19
259
Average
Count
90.4
(243)
89.1
(242)
88.5
(235)
79,5
(175)
79.2
(169)
82.9
(222)
79.8
(114 )
88.6
(15)
76.7
(1)
#N +A
(0)
Southwest
B7.)7
2284Average
Count
90.2
(7130)
90
(2108)
88.7
(2060)
84.2
(2126),_(2023),
83.3
84.4
(2004)
Q.2
(1059),
88.3
(124)
80.1
(21)
77.8
(3)
TABLE 8
MLASURI:D AVE RAGL SINGLE EVENT NOIST EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
April - June 2014
Ctrtricr
AC Tyic
Deps
ISMS Site
IS
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7�
8N
9N
ION
. ik) W: ,i
CRJ7
470
Average
Count
88.2
(436)
87.3
(433)
869
(420)
90.0
(301)
79.9
(292)
81.71
(388)
79.6
(178)
87.2
(27)
79.4
(2)
-N A
(0)
MEASURED AVERAGI= SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
April - June 2014
Carrier
AC Type
of Deps
NMS Site
1 15
2S
35
4S
5S
6S
7S
8K
9N
10*!
G. nee al Avi i;.or_
JL!
3085
Awerage
Count
89.1
(2713)
87.0
(2654)
89,2
(2570)
83.11
(1478)
82.2
(1094)
83.1
(2167)
82.1
(427)
85,9
(165)
79.9
(5)
793
(7)
TABU~ 9
AIR CARRILR OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Carrier
T,ML
Ye&_
21010
2011
711
irCanada AC
A319
340
4
E190
52
Alaska Air A
B734
152
110
84
73
40
B737
5.839
' ,435
6,238
5,673
2.353
B738
893
7611
942
1.162
917
American A,x
- '
7,493
7,208
7,667
8,658
4,337
B:52
1,999
1.519
911
2
MD82
4
4
Compass CP
E 170
1,352
Continental CO
B737
4,646
4,124
B738
1,190
1.163
Dclta DL
A319
3.903
5348
3,436
3,354
1,G -4
A320
372
36
31
21
18
B737
3.082
3.373
1,860
Il
B738
433
87
551
14
2
B752
362
45
1,073
2,214
L078
MD90
371
edEx FM
A306
500
w06
508
506
254
A310
4
2
2
2
Frontier Airlimm F9
A318
284
88
369
17
A319
2,596
2,751
2,368
2.278
1,147
320
6
2
Interiet 40 1
A320
1 346
1,490
424
Mesa Airlines YV
CR:^
1,437
720
626
418
NMbwest NW
A31 y
162
320
4
SkvWest Com1, SC
CRJ9
584
2,0341
1,037
Southwest WN
8733
4
2
B737
30,986
3LIS71
33.490
35,234
16,778
B738
1 132
391
520
Linkod IJA
A319
1,900
1,931
2,133
2,453
962
A320
4,053
4.419
4.554
4,229
1,301
8735
1
B737
447
3,786
3,836
2,078
B738
77
1.407
1,305
950
B739
1 2
B752
1,482
916
1,039
L557
134
L;Ps 5X
B752
416
420
414
4121
204
S Armvays AW
A319
783
1,152
1442
1.997
656
A320
1333
1,086
L485
888
734
A321
444
586
247
860
388
B733
1,632
1,349
B752
28
32
8
22
16
Virgin America V]{
A319
104
A320
962
W {. WS
B736
2
B737
766
1.093
730
362
91241 1
79.658 1
80,691
81,841
38,372
TABLF. 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircratl
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
A306
500
506
508
506
254
A310
4
2
2
2
A318
284
88
369
17
A319
9.788
11.186
10.379
10.082
4,443
A320
6.724
5.547
6,418
6.628
2,477
A321
444
586
247
860
388
8733
1.632
1.353
2
8734
152
110
84
73
40
B735
I
8736
2
B737
45.553
47.332
46,467
45.484
21,571
B738
10.009
9.296
10.203
11.530
6.1
B739
2
B752
4.287
2.932
3,445
4.205
1,2'
CRJ9
1.437
720
1,210
2.452
U
E 170
1,352
E 190
52
MD82
4
4
MD90
371
otal
81,241
79,658
80,691
81,841
38.372
- 13 .
TV L 11
AIR C.ARRII R AVI RACE DAILY DLPARTURE HISTORY
t srrkr
At
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Air Canadi ACS
A319
.466
.005
E190
.071
Alaska Air AS
8734
.203
.151
.115
.101
.055
8737
9.373
10.178
8.527
7.775
3.225
B738
.. 22 5
1.0491
1.284
1.586
1.255
Ar,r4 r AA
B738
10.266
9.8771
10.484
1 }.860
5.942
B752
2.737
2,082
1.235
.003
MD82
.005
.005
Compass CP
E170
1.847
[ 1.13uinent -1 CO
B737
6.342
5.649
6738
1.652
1.597
D'.II M
A319
5.353
7.321
4.699
4.597
2.299
A320
504
.0551
041
.027
.025
B737
4 219
4.627
2.538
.016
8738
.597
.115
.079
,019
.003
B752
.499
.063
1.462
3.033
1.477
MD90
.510
oax FM
A306
.685
,693
.694
.693
.348
A310
_005
003
.003
.003
f romier Airlinm F9
A318
.389
.121
.503
.025
A319
3.559
31770
3.235
3.121
1,5'
A320
,008
.003
Interiet 40
A320
1 .473
2.041
Mesa Airlines YV
CR.19
1.97;
.986
,855
.573
Northwest NW
A319
.222
A320
.005
SkyWest Coml. SC
CRJ9
.801
2,7861
1.419
Southwest WN
B733
.105
_003
8737
,:,466
42.737
45.770
48.268
22.975
9738
.180
.537
,721
UA
A319
'.605
2 627
2.910
3.364
1.321
A320
5.553
6.0"1
6,240
5.797
1,784
B735
8737
,608
5.178
5.249
2.847
B738
.110
1.921
1."
1.299
B739
.003
B752
2.033
1.252
1.418
2.132
.184
5X
B752
_570
.575
.566
_564
.279
AW
&319
1.071
1.5751
1331
2.732
.899
A320
1.819
1.4881
2025
1.219
1.005
A321
.614
,805
.344
1.181
.532
B733
2.238
1.849
B752
038
.044
.011
.030
.022
ViNinAmcxicsi YX
319
142
A320
318
WesUet WS JR736
.003
B737
1.049
1.492
1.000
.496
otal
111,329
109.103
110.270
112.126
52.564
-14-
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Date: June 11, 2014
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Eddie Martin Building.
AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED:
Topic Discussion and/or Commtnt,; and Ouestions
Three residents of Anaheim Hills attended the June 11, 2014 Quarterly Noise Meeting. Their
names are Tom Schuepbach Maria Schuepbach, and Bill Straits. They attended the meeting to
voice their concern over what they believe is a flis;ht path change over Anaheim Hills for
arriving aircraft at John Wayne Airport. Mrs. Schuepbach stated that something has changed in
the arriving flight path for JWA. Eric Freed stated there has been no changes to the approach
into JWA. Eric did stated that he is not saying there is not traffic over the area, but that no
changes have been made to approach. Mr. Schuepbach stated that of the aircraft passing over his
residence, approximately 20% are way too low. He stated it feels like he lives in the approach of
LaGuardia. All three residents stated the increase in air traffic over their area began
approximately three weeks ago. Eric stated he would like to Vet the addresses of the residents so
that our office could run flight tracks to compare past to present.
Mr. Straits asked that assuming the residents are right about the recent increase in air traffic over
their homes, what could be done. Eric stated the FAA is the only entity with control over
airspace matters, and the likelihood of making any changes is remote. Mr. Scheupbach asked if
all aircraft are to make same approach when arriving into JWA. Eric stated they are directed
trorn different directions. Mr. Straits asked how one can change the noise limits. Eric informed
Mr. Straits that the 1990 ANCA precludes the Airport from setting more restrictive noise limits.
Mrs. Schuepbach informed us that a notice was sent out to residents in their neighborhood to
attend this meeting to voice their concerns regarding. the air traffic. Mrs. Schuepbach stated she
could not believe no one showed up. Silvia Zavala asked the residents if anyone had called our
office to complain. All residents stated they have not called to submit a complaint. Mr. Straits
stated that his wife, Kristin Straits, called the day before the meeting. Mrs. Schuepbach asked if
there is a way the traffic can be rotated over different areas to distribute the noise impact. Eric
stated the FAA will not rotate traffic for the purpose of moving noise. Eric stag -d the FAA's
goal is safety and efficiency. Nick Gaskins presented Airport Stats for Apri 12014.
Eric informed all residents that our office would run flight track data comparinLr past to present,
as well as altitude data. He asked that they allow our office two weeks to prepare this data.
They agreed and meeting was adjourned.
-15-
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
NAME
Tom Schuepbach
Maria Schuepbach
Bill Straits
Eric Freed
Nikolas Gaskins
Silvia Zavala
June 11, 2014
- 16-
ORGANIZATION
Resident Anaheim Hills
Resident —Anaheim Hills
Resident- Anaheim Hills
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
SNA/John WaN ne Airport
SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMF NT OF TRANSPORTATION
I . Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21,
chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6):
4.85 acres (or 0.008 square miles)
2. Estimated Number of dwelling units : ncluded in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
71
3. Estimated number of people residing within the Nose Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with
estimated number of operations by this aircraft type duri n,r the calendar quarter reporting, period:
B738 —3,612 (arrivals + departures)
Total number of aircraft operations dur n:_ the calendar quarter:
6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
69,097
20,629
7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Fart
36, Stage III:
(Not mandatory)
100%
8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter
(Not mandatory)
48,282
9. lMimat:d number of operations by Military aircrafi durin:; the calendar quarter_
(Not mandatory)
186