Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1988 05 02MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA MAY 2, 1988 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:02 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, and the Invocation was given by Councilman Edgar. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Earl J. Prescott Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Christine Shingleton, Dir. of Comm. Development Fred Wakefield, Police Captain Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Royleen White, Dir. of Comm. & Adm. Services Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Valerie Whiteman, Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 100 in the audience III. PROCLAMATIONS 1. OLDER AMERICANS NDNTH Mayor Hoesterey read and presented the Proclamation to Katherine Child, President of the Tustin Senior Citizens Club; Estelle .- Dickerson-Newboldt, President of Tustin American Association of Retired Persons, Chapter 3479; and Nick Ogden, TLC Program. The Proclamation designated the month of May, 1988, as "Tustin Older Americans Month". 84 2. FIRE SERVICE RECOGNITION DAY Mayor Hoesterey read and presented the Proclamation to Fire Chief McCoy. Fire Chief McCoy, on behalf of Fire Chief Larry Holms, expressed appreciation for the Proclamation and invited the Council and staff to attend the Fire Department's Open House on May 21, 1988. The Proclamation designated May 14, 1988, as "Fire Service Recognition Day". 84 IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATION FOR CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE MAYOR'S BREAKFAST Representatives from the Chamber of Commerce and Jaycees were not in attendance for the presentation. 84 V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-4 (CULTURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT) Christine Shingleton, Director of Community Development, gave a staff report indicating that this item, after review by Council on March 7, 1988, was referred back to the Planning Commission for additional modifications. For the benefit of those in the audience not present on March 7, a background report was given. This program was initiated at the request of the City Council in October, 1986, in response to issues raised regarding development proposals in the Old Town area. The specific objective was to design zoning requirements to retain the character of Old Town, reduce potential land -use conflicts and preserve historical resources. The City Council adopted a moratorium on subdivisions, zone changes and land -use changes and requested staff to begin the necessary zoning CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 5-2-88 code amendments. After community workshops and extensive staff research, a draft ordinance was prepared and presented to the community in December, 1987. After receiving input from the community, the ordinance was modified to meet community concerns and referred to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 8, 1988, and made their recommendation to the Council on March 7, 1988. The Public Hearing was opened by Mayor Hoesterey at 7:22 p.m. The following spoke in favor of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 87-4 for reasons that included preservation of historic homes and neighborhoods, availability of low interest loans, tax benefits for merchants and owners, increased property values, and community pride. John Sauers, 515 S. Pacific, Tustin Richard and Sally Vining, 400 West Main, Tustin Alan Curl, 3720 Orange, Riverside Ruth Harmon, 13271 Fairmont Way, Tustin Jeff Thompson, 405 West 6th, Tustin There were no other"speakers on the matter and the Public Hearing was closed at 7:48 p.m. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 88-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-4 INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Councilman Edgar voiced his opposition to the concept of incorporating a commerical area and wanted to approve the Resolution without being committed to the land -use. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained. It was moved by Kennedy,seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 1001 have first reading by title only. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1001 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 1001 be introduced as Tor ows: ORDINANCE NO. 1001 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 87-4 AMENDING PART 5 AND 7 OF CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE AS IT RELATES TO CULTURAL RESOURCES. Councilman Edgar stated his quandry was forcing people in the commercial area into the district and proposed an amendment to delete the commercial area. He would not support the Ordinance without the amendment. It was moved by Edgar that an amendment deleting the commerical area be added to proposed Ordinance No. 1001. (No second was made). Mayor Hoesterey stated that because the commerical district is a "window" to the area and there are historical buildings there, he did not want to delete the commerical district. Future amendments could be made if necessary. He supported the Ordinance as presented by the Planning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy felt it was a mistake to separate the commercial district from the cultural overlay district. She had not received input from any business expressing either inclusion or deletion from the district. Commerical property owners had participated in the planning workshops and it would be a great folly to separate these two districts. The fragile center of the town CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 5-2-88 must be protected and she urged Councilman Edgar, because he had the deciding vote, to keep the two districts together. Councilman Edgar repeated that he was in favor of an overlay district to protect the homes in the downtown area, but he could not vote against his conscience by forcing the commerical people into the district. r- Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked if a two week continuance would be acceptable in order to receive input from the commercial area. Christine Shingleton informed Council that proper notice had been given regarding the Public Hearing and the executive summary of the proposed Ordinance had been sent. She indicated, if directed, her willingness to speak to the individual tenants. A timeline longer than two weeks would be required to accomplish this task. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this item at the June 6, 1988, meeting. The motion carried 3-0, Kelly and Prescott abstained. 110 VI. PUBLIC INPUT 1. USE PERMIT 88-5 (VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP) Sally Vining, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, asked that an EIR be completed regarding concentration of churches in the downtown area and the number of hours for services. Christine Shingleton stated that the Council did certify the completion of the negative declaration and a notice of determination had been filed. All provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act had been met and she recommended that the matter not be opened for further discussion. 43 2. PRESERVATION OF REDWOOD TREES - EAST TUSTIN COMMUNITY PARK AREA Richard Vining, 400 W. Main Street, Tustin, was concerned about the redwood trees in the area of the East Tustin community park and wanted to insure their preservation. Christine Shingleton stated that both the environmental document and East Tustin Specific Plan reinforces the preservation of the redwood grove in conjunction with future community park sites or other community facilities. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked that the trees be watched carefully and are not unnecessarily medically treated. 86 3. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 (FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12870) Joseph Herzig requested that Item No. 3, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 12870, be pulled from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Hoesterey stated that Mr. Herzig could speak on Item No. 3 during the Consent Calendar portion of the agenda. 99 4. GO-KART RACES Kevin Shein, Championship Kart Racing Association, informed the Council that filing of a temporary use permit for the Franklin/Walnut site had been completed and quotes for insurance in the requested amount were being obtained. 96.1 5. CONCERN REGARDING COUNCILMAN KELLY'S CAMPAIGN BANNERS Theodore Fessler, 275 Centennial Way, Tustin, expressed his concern regarding the banners displayed at Councilman Kelly's campaign headquarters. As property manager of Larwin Square, several of his tenants had complained to him about this disregard for existing laws. After speaking with Councilman Kelly about the matter, he was extremely concerned about conflict of interest and asked that CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 5-2-88 Councilman Kelly resign his position on the Council and then continue his campaign for Congress. Councilman Kelly stated he would not respond; that there were more important items on the agenda for discussion. Mayor Hoesterey said that he had become dismayed with the articles in the newspapers regarding this situation. He felt that when Councilman Kelly took his oath of office he swore to uphold the laws, but his actions indicate that he intended to break the law when he displayed the banners and moved into a condemned building. The Mayor stated that to remain silent at this time would be to condone Councilman Kelly's activities. Councilman Kelly stated that he was not aware he was breaking the law and will continue to go forth. He felt that the existing laws covering this matter needed to be eliminated. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated that she had received telephone calls questionning a situation that allows one councilperson to break the laws that they are responsible for enforcing. It has been an embarrassment and she looked forward to Councilman Kelly taking steps to change the laws in an orderly way. Greg Kelly, 330 El Camino Real, Tustin, spoke in favor of his brother's position. Judy Karwelis, 17891 Allegheny, Tustin, stated that Councilman Kelly is responsible for upholding the laws. Jerry Weil spoke regarding the obeisance of City laws. 93 6. PRESERVATION OF HOME AT 14851 YORBA STREET Jeff Frank, 12032 Sky Lane, Santa Ana, asked for assistance from the City regarding the preservation of the home at 14851 Yorba Street, which he is attempting to purchase. He will need to have the house moved to a location that will require a lot -split. He also questioned the amount of $8,000 in permit fees for the lot -split. Christine Shingleton indicated that the property requiring the lot -split is located in the County jurisdiction. If she could receive a contact name from Mr. Frank, she would assist him in his discussions with the County. Mr. Frank indicated an additional problem of electrical and cable television lines during the move and asked for assistance from the City. Mayor Hoesterey, with Council concurrence, directed staff to work with Mr. Frank in dealing with the various agencies involved. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy restated the Council's commitment to saving this house and she was upset with the previous information given to the Council indicating that this home had been damaged beyond repair by termites. She intends to obtain an explanation. 31 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR Item 3 was removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of Joseph Herzig, and Item 11 was removed by Edgar. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried 5-0. 1.APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 18, 1988, REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $999,587.43 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $178,245.46 50 Ui IT LUUIM iL MiNU i t� Page 5, 5-2-88 4, REJECTION OF CLAIM NO. 88-4; CLAIMANT - ALLEN CLINKSCALE; DATE OF LOSS - 11/9/87; DATE FILED WITH CITY - 1/25/88 Rejected subject claim for property damage in the amount of $3,321.17 as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 5. RESOLUTION NO. 88-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TERMINATING FAIRHAVEN AVENUE ANNEXATION NO. 144. Adopted Resolution No. 88-46 as recommended by the City Attorney. 24 6. RESOLUTION NO. 88-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TERMINATING PROSPECT AVENUE ANNEXATION NO.. 145. Adopted Resolution No. 88-47 as recommended by the City Attorney. 24 7. RESOLUTION NO. 88-48 -.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER REPAIR PROJECT, 1987-88 FISCAL YEAR, AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS. Adopted Resolution No. 88-48 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 92 8. IMPROVEMENTS BY ORANGE COUNTY IN EL MODENA-IRVINE CHANNEL AND IN RED HILL CHANNEL Approved the County project for construction of improvements in E1 Modena -Irvine Channel (F07) and in Red Hill Channel (F13) as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 67 9. RESOLUTION NO. 88-49 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 1988-89 FISCAL YEAR FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT. Adopted Resolution No. 88-49 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 63 10. RESOLUTION NO. 88-51 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING CONSENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF ORANGE AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO THE FORMATION OF AND WORK RELATING TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-2, THE ASSESSMENT ON THE LAND THEREIN, AND THE ASSUMPTION OF JURISDICTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF ORANGE AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE LYING WITHIN SUCH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. Adopted Resolution No. 88-51 as prepared by the City Attorney. 25 12. AGREEMENT WITH IRWD FOR INSTALLATION OF FACILITIES IN EL CAMINO REAL Approved an agreement with the Irvine Ranch Water District providing for installation of domestic water and reclaimed water facilities in E1 Camino Real between Myford Road and Jamboree Road as -recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 107 Consent Calendar Item No. 3 - Resolution No. 88-45 Joseph Herzig expressed his concern with subject tract map regarding potential flood problems. He submitted a letter to the Council. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Prescott to adopt the following as recommended by the Community Development Department: 3. RESOLUTION NO. 88-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12870. The motion carried 5-0. 99 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 5-2-88 Consent Calendar Item No. 11 - Resolution No. 88-50 ounce man dgar was concerned about the destruction of City Council and Planning Commission minutes. City Attorney Rourke assured him that these were copies being destroyed and the official records were retained in the City Clerk's office. Councilman Prescott suggested that the copies be offered to the Historical Society. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division: 11. RESOLUTION NO. 88-50 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECORDS The motion carried 5-0. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None XI. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None X. OLD BUSINESS 1. JWA NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM - STATUS REPORT Christine Shingleton reported there was no change in status. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to receive and file subject report. The motion carried 5-0. 2. AUDIT COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Mayor Hoesterey stated that applicants had been interviewed on April 18, 1988, by the City Council. Voting on the candidates would be public information. He directed the Council to submit the three names of their choice in writing and sign their ballot. The three individuals receiving the highest number of votes would be appointed to the Audit Committee. Before the vote, it was movedby Prescott, seconded by Edgar, that a fourth position of alternate be added to the committee and staff agendize an amendment to Resolution 87-131 reflecting that change. The motion carried 5-0. Following is the tabulation of votes for the committee members and the alternate: Hoesterey: Feldman, Greinke, Weil and Sullens (Alternate) Kennedy: Feldman, Weil, Pagano and Sullens (Alternate) Edgar: Feldman, Greinke, Weil and Sullens (Alternate) Kelly: Mulcahy, Daly, Sullens and Pagano (Alternate) Prescott: Mulcahy, Feldman, Greinke and Sullens (Alternate) The following will serve on the Audit Committee: Evelyn Feldman (4 votes), Frank Greinke (3 votes), and Jerry Weil (3 votes). Walter Sullens will serve as alternate (4 votes). A question was raised from the audience as to the term of office. Staff will report back to Council this information. 3. NEWPORT AVENUE/MCFADDEN AVENUE UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 10 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to continue this item at the May 16, 1988, meeting. The motion carried 5-0. Councilman Edgar asked if a response from Mrs. O'Dell had been received by staff. Robert Ledendecker, Director of Public Works, indicated that she CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 5-2-88 was still out of town and staff had not been able to make full contact with the utility involved. Thus, the reason for recommending continuance. 104 XI. NEW BUSINESS 1. TUSTIN-IRVINE-ORANGE (TIO) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR FOOTHILL EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of Tustin, Irvine, and Orange regarding the implementation of the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor subject to final approval by the City Attorney as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. The following spoke in opposition to the Memorandum of Understanding with concerns including lack of community participation in the negotiations of the MOU, air and noise pollution, size and proximity to homes of the Jamboree expressway, water and drainage problems, lack of an EIR for Peters Canyon, and future upgrading of the Jamboree expressway: Carole Katz, 1801 Bridle Path, Santa Ana Frank Cate, 10204 Overhill, Santa Ana Jerome Duffy, 10611 Equestrian, Santa Ana Francine Passen, 1772 Sirrine, Santa Ana Mayor Hoesterey stated that the City of Tustin is only one of a number of agencies making a recommendation to the Transportation Commission. The EIR will be completed and public comments will be made at the level of the agency making the decisions as to future alignments of the corridors. The motion carried 5-0. It was moved by Prescott, seconded by Kelly, that, as an addition to the original motion, Councilman Edgar write a cover letter to accompany the MOU. Councilman Edgar stated that this MOU represents several years of interface between himself, representing the City of Tustin, and the cities of Irvine and Orange. The Cities had tried to reach an appropriate compromise that would accommodate traffic and, at the same time, have minimal environmental impact. This MOU is not a final decision, the final decision will be made by the Transportation Corridor Agency. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy said she felt that the more than its share of solving regional regretted having to approve the MOU; and, moved even slightly closer to Tustin or th leg of this new plan, she would gather local this plan. The motion carried 5-0. 2. 1988-89 BUDGET WORKSHOP City of Tustin had done traffic problems. She if the expressway was e City loses the eastern support and help defeat 101 Council concurred that the Budget Workshop would be on June 6, 1988, at 5:00 p.m. 29 3. COALITION 95 STEERING COMMITTEE - CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT It was moved b Ed ar, seconded b Hoestere that Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy a appointe to t e oa ition Steering Committee. The motion carried 5-0. The Coalition will gather information regarding off -shore oil leasing. 38 XII. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA - APRIL 25, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 5-2-88 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested that Item No. 6 (Tustin Market Place) be pulled from the Action Agenda. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to ratify the remainder of the Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 25, 1988. The motion carried 5-0. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy expressed her concerns over the unusual design of the project. The Council, when presented a very sophisticated plan, had requested it be toned down. She was extremely disappointed that the Planning Commission had allowed 90 ft. towers that would be covered in aluminum and painted. The Planning Commission also allowed use of accent colors such as purple, pink and lime green. She felt these colors need to be used with extreme caution, especially when covering huge walls. She did not want to appeal this item, but asked Council to agree on very careful monitoring of this project. Mayor Hoesterey stated he shared the same views. The project presented was not the same one going forward now. Prior discussions had included that accent colors would only be used at entrance ways, not on 'massive walls. Kathy Weil, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated that the Commission had been told there were no changes from the original model and additional colors had not been added. Christine Shingleton indicated that this matter had been brought to the Planning Commission because of the assurance that use of color, not the palette, would be toned down. The renderings appeared to show that there were larger vertical surface areas with color then had been originally viewed. The Planning Commission delayed their decision regarding the parameter walls. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to ratify Item No. 6 with the provision that regular reports on the project are provided to Council. The motion carried 5-0. 80 2. PICKWICK MANOR. GODFATHER'S BAR NOISE COMPLAINT It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file. The motion carried 5-0. 42 3. STATUS REPORT - SAN DIEGO PIPELINE INSTALLATION Richard Vining stated his concerns regarding the level of performance of San Diego Pipeline, particularly in the area of regrinding road surfaces. Mayor Hoesterey stated that final grinding and resurfacing will take place on May 2, 1988, and directed staff to monitor. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy had received telephone calls from residents regarding road conditions and the mud on Bryan has not been cleaned up. She suggested perhaps a financial penalty against San Diego Pipeline. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to explore financial penalties against San Diego Pipeline and direct San Diego Pipeline to restore roads, remove mud from south side of Bryan, and repaint curbing. The motion carried 4-0, Kelly absent. 45 4. COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS - MARKED PATROL UNIT PURCHASE It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file. The motion carried 5-0. 82 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 5-2-88 5. PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK STATUS It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to receive and file. The motion carried 5-0. 77 6. REPORT REGARDING STUDENT INTERN PROGRAM Councilman Prescott thanked staff for a well-done report and requested that this item be tabled until a response was received from the Tustin Unified School District. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy stated her interest was in an annual Government Awareness Day or college level internship program. She did not feel a high school program would be appropriate because of the cost to the City. Mayor Hoesterey supported the college -level interns, but did not have enough information at this time to recommend a program for high school students. Councilman Prescott requested permission to pursue this matter at the high school level with the school district. Council concurred. 90 XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. NAMING OF CITY STREETS Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested agendizing the procedures required to name a City street. 96 2. REQUESTS FOR TRANSCRIPTS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy requested agendizing preparation of a policy governing requests for transcripts of Council meetings. 37 3. TIMELINE OF DOCUMENTATION FOR PARK ADVISORY COMMISSION Councilman Edgar asked for status on ordinance to create the Commission. City Attorney Rourke will have the information for Council as soon as possible. 76 4. REINSTATEMENT OF PUBLIC COFFEE POT IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Councilman Prescott requested that coffee be available for the public during" Council meetings. Council concurred. 39 5. TREES ALONG CENTENNIAL WAY Councilman Prescott noted that there are three trees on Centennial Way that are different from the others. He requested replacement for conformity of bloom. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy verified that he meant by natural attrition. Mayor Hoesterey requested that Robert Ledendecker check into the matter. 86 XIV. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - ADJOURNMENT At 10:07 p.m., it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, and thence to a joint workshop with the Planning Commission on Monday, May 16, 1988, at 5:00 p.m., and thence adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, May 16, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. The motion carried 5-0. MAYOR IYY CLLR