Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1987 02 17 MNUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 17, 1987 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Saltarelli at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of All egiance was led by Councilwoman Kennedy, and the Invocation was given by Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: ~onald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Ronald B. Hoesterey, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar John Kelly Ursula E. Kennedy Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Christine Shingleton, Com. Dev. Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Public Works Director Captain Foster, Police Department Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Laura Pickup, Assistant Planner Janet M. Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 80 in the Audience III. PROCLAMATION 1. HUGH WEST - RETIRED MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT Mayor Saltarelli read a proclamation congratulating Hugh West on his retirement from over 20 years of dedicated service to the City. The Mayor offered personal reflections and thanks on Mr. West's many achievements throughout the years. Councilwoman Kennedy added her personal thanks. Mr. West thanked the Council. 84 IV, PUBLIC HEARING 1. PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 139 - EVENINGSIDE/RAINBOW - RESOLUTON NO. 87-20 The proposed annexation area is bounded by Irvine Boulevard on the south, Browning Avenue on the west, La Colina on the north, and the Irvine Ranch on the east. Of 179 registered voters in this area, 34 signed a petition for annexation. The area consists of 85 single-family homes and the Tustin Memorial Elementary School and is entirely zoned E-4 (Estate Residential). The Community Development Director noted that the public hearing is an informational hearing only, NOT a protest hearing, to provide area residents an opportunity to make comment. Council has discretion this evening to either table Resolution No. 87-20 or adopt it for transmittal to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). Mayor Saltarelli opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. Ed German, 12581 Ranchwood Road, was opposed to annexation at the present time. He favored tabling the matter until completion of the study by the North Tustin Municipal Advisory Council (NTMAC) on whether to incorporate, request annexation, or maintain status quo. He stated a canvas of the area was conducted, and 47 signatures were obtained in favor of tabling annexation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 2-17-87 Ralph Provost, 12301 Vista Panorama, representing NTMAC, spoke in opposition to the annexation. He requested Council table the mat- ter until completion of the study as referenced by Mr. German. He expressed concern that 5% of a particular area can represent a petition for annexation. Mr. Provost and the Mayor discussed the matter of misinformation being circulated to residents from both sides of the issue. The Mayor suggested NTMAC prepare a publica- tion representing their views for distribution. Joyce Wing, 2072 Shelterwood Road, expressed concern that the mat- ter of annexation came up so suddenly. She favored Council table the matter until completion of subject study. Arnold Kluender, 12901 Eveningside Drive, spoke in favor of annexa- tion. He stated the petition for annexation is a grass roots move- ment, and was not influenced by the Tustin City Council in any way. Marshall Krupp, 1891 Beverly Glen Drive, asked that Council: 1) Follow legal administrative procedures as set forth by the Government Code and LAFCO in processing the annexation; and 2) Announce that anyone who wants to be informed of annexations file a letter with LAFCO requesting same, and LAFCO will be more than happy to do so. In response to Mr. Krupp, the Mayor stated that the City is not encouraging or seeking annexation of areas in North Tustin. This annexation and petitions circulating in other areas are initiated by residents who want to annex their area to the City. Carol Shrider, Foothill Communities Association President, requested Council postpone further action on any annexation peti- tions until after July 1, 1987, involving County Service Area 5 (North Tustin unincorporated area), and stated reasons therefor as contained in a document which she distributed to Council. She stated that postponing action would give them an opportunity to obtain information on their own behalf, and then come back and dis- cuss it further with Council. She stated the study will assist people in making an informed decision rather than an emotional one. Ted Howardson, 12861 Eveningside, stated he and his wife signed the petition requesting annexation. However, they now feel that infor- mation to be provided by the feasibility study is needed, and they have changed their position and want to remain unincorporated. Phyllis Spivey, North Tustin resident, 13691 Jenet Circle, ques- tioned that the feasibility study will be objective. She cited several incidents which have lead her to believe that the study will focus on annexation or incorporation, deleting status quo as a consideration. Dessa Schroeder, NTMAC member, stated that they are not opposed to annexations so long as people are informed and there is a consensus of residents in that area. She and the Mayor debated various issues relative to the City's position on annexations in the North Tustin area. Both agreed that there has been a great deal of mis- understanding. The City Manager clarified that Mrs. Schroeder was correct in stat- ing that the City is only required by State law to notify persons of the hearing through publication in an adjudicated newspaper. In addition, it has been City policy to also mail notice to all prop- erty owners in the area, which was done on February 6. Therefore, contrary to what she stated, every property owner in the area was mailed a notice of this evening's hearing. Bea Foster identified herself as originator of the campaign to incorporate North Tustin to place the matter on the ballot. She stated that one reason for the incorporation attempt is to slow down proposed freeways which are planned to go through the area. She and the Mayor debated over the increased cost for services if incorporation is accomplished. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 2-17-87 Marshall Krupp stated that he resigned from the NTMAC ad hoc com- mittee because he felt false information was being conveyed to the community. He stated that it was clearly understood by all (in a meeting artended by Ms. Seman, Ms. Schroeder, himself, Mayor Salta- relli, and Councilman Edgar) that Mayor Saltarelli stated he was prepared to bring before the Council a recommendation to do a phased annexation of North Tustin over an 18-24 month period to phase-in services in an economically viable manner. Jo Ellen White, 12998 Eveningside Drive, spoke in favor of the pro- posed annexation. Dr. Einerstorm, 12541 Vista Panorama, stated he is a chief peti- tioner to incorporate North Tustin. He stated that the East Orange County Water District Board agreed to assist them and asked that they obtain petitions signed by citizens of North Tustin for incor- poration. Residents are also awaiting completion of the feasi- bility study. He felt that placing the issue of incorporation on the ballot will keep all three options open (incorporation, annexa- tion, or status quo). Bill Weber, Kootney Drive, Vice Chairman of North Tustin Tomorrow, stated that the committee does not advocate any specific course of action for the community at this time, but was formed to spearhead the feasibility study and to carry forward its recommendations to North Tustin residents. He provided a timetable for completion of the study and distributed to Council copies of the Request For Pro- posal for the study. Mayor Saltarelli closed the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey proposed that the City conduct an updated informational meeting for residents of the proposed annexation area. This would then give the City direction on how to proceed. Councilman Edgar stated that annexation proceedings will afford residents various opportunities over the next few months to obtain information and to provide public input. He spoke in support of residents in unincorporated areas adjacent to existing Tustin boundaries who request annexation. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 87-20 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, MAKING APPLICATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS EVENINGSIDE/RAINBOW ANNEXATION NO. 139 Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey again proposed an informational meeting to preclude accusations that the annexation was "railroaded." On that basis, he expressed opposition to the motion. Councilwoman Kennedy received confirmation that all property owners within the annexation area were mailed a notice of this evening's hearing. The Community Development Director stated that staff was not contacted by anyone on the matter. Councilman Kelly spoke in support of the motion. The Mayor stated that residents in the annexation area have made a legitimate request. If it's not submitted to LAFCO, they will be denied due process of law. He felt that people in Orange's sphere of influence should not speak on the issue. He encouraged resi- dents to meet with City staff to obtain any information they need. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey differed that the timing of such meetings is important, stating that the best way to dispel misinformation is to get all sides in one room at the same time. Councilwoman Kennedy stated she would support the motion if an informational letter was drafted for review by Council, citing all the facts and procedures for annexation, pro and con. The majority could then make an informed decision on annexation. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 2-17-87 The motion was amended by Edgar, seconded by Kelly, to adopt Reso- lution No. 87-20 to include preparation of a letter as proposed by Councilwoman Kennedy. The amended motion carried 4-1, Hoesterey opposed (not against annexation, but he would like to see the pro- cess a little different). 24 V. PUBLIC INPUT 1. REQUEST FOR PARKING RESTRICTION - WEST MAIN STREET Margaret Riley, 715 West Main Street, presented a petition contain- ing six signatures requesting parking restrictions for street sweeping. At the February 2 meeting, she voiced concerns that the street is not swept due to vehicles parked on the street, and she was informed of the procedure for parking restriction. The Mayor thanked Mrs. Riley and referred the matter to staff for review and recommendation. 75 2. IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WEST MAIN STREET Richard Vining, 400 West Main Street, was informed by the Director ~ of Public Works of street, sidewalk, curb and gutter improvements to be constructed along West Main Street. 95 VIo CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kelly, to ,approve the entire Consent Calendar (see Item No. 3). The motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - FEBRUARY 2, 1987, REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,633,119.36 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $157,995.88 50 3. FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS CONTRACT Authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement in the amount of $8,700.00 with Pyro Spectacular Fireworks Company to provide a pyro-musical show for the 1987 Annual Fourth of July Celebration as recommended by the Community Services Depart- ment. 45; 87-12 As requested by Councilwoman Kennedy, Council concurred that there be no advertisement of the State Lottery associated with the show. 4. RESOLUTION NO, 87-21 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF ADMINISTRA- TIVE, MANAGEMENT, AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES Adopted Resolution No. 87-21 as recommended by the City Man- ager. 79 5. RESOLUTION NU, 87-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE APPLICATION OF THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT TO THE PROPOSED EVENINGSIDE/RAINBOW ANNEXATION NO. 139 Adopted Resolution No. 87-22 pursuant to Council action on its intent to adopt a resolution of application for subject annexa- tion, and as recommended by the Community Development Depart- ment. (Reference Public Hearing Item No. 1) 24 6. RESOLUTION NU. 87-19 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REVISED ANIMAL FACILITY LICENSE FEES AND ANIMAL PERMIT FEES Adopted Resolution No. 87-19 as proposed by the Orange County Department of Animal Control and approved by the County Board of Supervisors on December 16, 1986. 23 7. SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5) WIDENING FROM ROUTE 55 TO ROUTE 22 Authorized staff to respond on the Draft EIR-EIS for the Santa Aria Freeway widening (Rte. 55 to Rte. 22) per the letter dated February 17, 1987, to Mr. Wayne Ballantine, Chief of Environ- mental Planning Branch, CalTrans, as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 54 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 2-17-87 8. RESOLUTION NO. 87-23 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION ("B" AND "C" STREET WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS) Adopted Resolution No. 87-23; and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed, authorized payment of the final 10% retention amount ($11,118.10) to R. T. Construction 30 days after date of recordation of the Notice of Completion as recom- mended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. 107 9, RESOLUTION NO. 87-24 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FAIRHAVEN, YORBA, NEWHAVEN, TROPIC :LANE WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS) Adopted Resolution No. 87-24; and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed, authorized payment of the final 10% retention amount ($18,958.68) to Spear Pipeline Construction 30 days after date of recordation of the Notice of Completion as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divi- sion. 107 10. RESOLUTION NO, 87-25 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCREASE THE ALLOCATION FROM THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVENTEENTH STREET BETWEEN THE COSTA MESA FREEWAY AND PROSPECT AVENUE (NORTH) Adopted Resolution No. 87-25 to formally request the County to increase its budgeted share by $25,000.00 for subject project as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divi- sion. 95 11. RESOLUTION NO. 87-26 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (SIDEWALK/WHEELCHAIR RAMPS - EL CAMINO REAL AND TUSTIN RANCH ROAD) Adopted Resolution No. 87-26; and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed, authorized payment of the final 10% retention amount ($9,170.64) to B-1 Enterprise Corporation 30 days after date of recordation of the Notice of Completion as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Divi- sion. 92 12. ELIMINATION OF WATER SERVICE/ANALYST AND WATER SERVICE MANAGER POSITIONS Eliminated the classification and position of Water Service Analyst effective March 1, 1987; and eliminated the classifica- tion and position of Water Services Manager effective July 14, 1987, as recommended by the City Manager. 79 VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None. VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION 1. ORDNANCE NO. 980 - CONSOLIDATION OF ELECTIONS A public hearing was conducted by Council on February 2, 1987, to obtain public input regarding consolidation with the Statewide General Election. One resident voiced opposition to consolidation. It was moved by Kelly, seconded by Hoestere~, that Ordinance No. 980 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 980 by the City Clerk it was moved by Kelly, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 980 be passed and adopted as foll.ows: ORDINANCE NO. 980 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING ITS GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION HELD IN NOVEMBER OF EVEN-NUMBERED YEARS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 36503.5 OF THE GOVERN- MENT CODE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 2-17-87 Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Saltarelli NOES: Kennedy ABSENT: None 48 IX. OLD BUSINESS 1. APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATE CITIZEN REPRESENTATIVE TO AVIATION NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE Councilwoman Kennedy requested staff agendize the application from James Brush, which was submitted in response to Council's search for a resident to serve as citizen alternate on subject committee. The City Manager informed Councilwoman Kennedy that no additional inquiries to serve as alternate on subject committee were pecei red. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to appoint James Brush to serve as alternate citizen representative to the Aviation Noise Abatement Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey asked that Mr. Brush coordinate with Councilman Edgar who is Council liaison to subject committee. The motion carried 5-0. 101 As requested by Councilwoman Kennedy, the Mayor requested that staff prepare a letter to Mr. Brush confirming his appointment. X. NEW BUSINESS 1 AWARD OF BID - PURCHASE OF A TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (Reference Redevelopment Agency Agenda, Item No. 4.) On December 15, 1986, Council approved the Request For Proposal and advertisement for bids for a telephonic communications system. Bids were opened on January 16, 1987. In conjunction, the Agency is requested to appropriate funds for the purchase of same. Bids for subject project were opened on January 16 as follows: Fujitsu Business Communications, Anaheim $116,957.00 GTEL, Cerritos $147,800.00 Tel Plus, Ariahelm $159,638.00 AT&T, Santa Aria $354,738.00 As recommended in the inter-com dated February 17, 1987, prepared by the City Manager, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, on behalf of the Tustin Community Redevelopmerit Agency, to autho- rize the purchase of a telephonic communications system from Fujitsu Business Communications, Anaheim, in the amount of $116,957.00. Carried 5-0. 39 2. CITIZEN COMPLAINT - 700 BLOCK OF WEST MAIN STREET Margaret Riley, 715 West Main Street, voiced concerns regarding sidewal ks and storm drain on West Main Street under Public Input at the February 2, 1987, meeting. Council referred subject matter to staff for report and recommendation. It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve sidewalk and catch basin improvements on the northerly side of Main Street between Myrtle Avenue and the Costa Mesa Freeway; and authorize a supplemental 1986-87 budget appropriation from general fund monies in the amount of $11,600.00 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in the inter-com dated February 9, 1987. The motion carried 5-0. 92 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 2-17-87 3. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK MASTER PLAN At the February 2, 1987, meeting, Councilman Edgar requested sub- ject item be agendized for discussion. In addition, he requested staff provide a progress report on Columbus Tustin Park. Following consideration of the inter-com dated February 10, 1987, prepared by the Community Services Department, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by 'Kennedy, to defer action until May 11, 1987, on the Columbus Tustin Park Master Plan when Council will conduct a workshop regarding park planning and financing. Carried 5-0. 77 4. CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF PROJECTS NO. 21, 22 AND 23, WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS Of nine water main replacement projectsincluded in the approved 1986-87 Budget, three areas have excessive leak history due to age and fatigue of pipe materials, in addition to being undersized. The project areas are on Alleman Place south of Vanderlip, Oak Lane north of Dodge, and on Arroyo Avenue north of La Loma. As recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in the inter-com dated February 10, 1987, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve selection of ASL Consult- ing Engineers for professional services for design of Water Main Replacement Projects No. 21, 22 and 23 at a fixed fee of $6,800.00; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Consultant Agreement subject to final approval of the City Attorney. Carried 5-0. 45; 87-13 5. NEWPORT AVENUE LEFT-TURN LANE STORAGE CAPACITIES As requested by Council, the City Traffic Consultant has completed ,., a study of storage capacities of Newport Avenue left-turn lanes between Irvine Boulevard and Walnut Avenue. As part of the budget , process, staff can then identify potential sources of funding available to the City. Council discussion followed, and the Director of Public WOrks responded to Council questions. The Director clarified that the peport's intent was to lay out problem areas and give Council an idea of preliminary costs for modification. Staff recommends that as the City works into the upcoming budget, prioritize modifica- tions at that time, and possibly fund them over a two to three-year period. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to defer review and prioritization of desired modifications of left-turn lane storage capacities for consideration in the 1987-88 Capital Improvement Budget as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division in the inter-com dated February 10, 1987. Carried 5-0. 95 6, ANNEXATION BROCHURE Staff prepared a draft brochure for distribution to persons con- sidering annexation to the City. Council/staff discussion ensued regarding the draft brochure and Council policy on annexations. Mayor Saltarelli suggested adding a third sentence to the first paragraph to read, "Should you have a desire to annex to the City of Tustin, the following information is presented for your review." It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the annexation brochure with the addition of a third sentence to the first paragraph to read, "Should you have a desi re to annex to the City of Tustin, the following information is presented for your review." The motion carried 5-0. 24 XI. REPORTS 1. PlANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - FEBRUARY 9, 1987 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to ratify the entire Planning Commission Action Agenda of February 9, 1987. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 2-17-87 The Community Development Director responded to Councilwoman Kennedy's concerns and questions regarding Item No. 4 Request from Carver Development on behalf of Blimpie Sandwiches and Chin's Chinese Kitchen to permit the installation of two tenant identifi- cation signs whichdo not conform to the basic master sign plan approved for Tustin Plaza. The motion carried 5-0. 80 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 31, 1987 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated February 10, 1987, prepared by the Finance Department. Carried 5-0. 50 3. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT VOR NAVIGATION SYSTEM As requested by Council at its February 2 meeting, staff has gath- ered information on current issues associated with obstruction of the VOR navigator system by surrounding development. Also, staff has prepared a draft letter to the FAA requesting that this poten- tially hazardous situation be dealt with promptly. As recommended in the inter-cem dated February 18, 1987, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to authorize the Mayor to transmit a letter to the FAA requesting immediate resolution of current VOR obstruc- tion. The motion carried 5-0. 101 4. WATER DEBT SURCHARGE FUND Mayor Saltarelli requested subject item be agendized for status review of the Water Debt Surcharge Fund, since he was the major proponent for same. He recalled that at the time the surcharge was implemented, Council made a commitment that when the cash flow could maintain payment of debt obligations as they became due, rates would be reduced. It now appears that the water surcharge could be lowered by 5%. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, that the City reduce the water debt surcharge by 5%. Carried 5-0. 107 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. ON-STREET PARKING FOR THE HANDICAPPED Councilman Kelly inquired about City policy for on-street handi- capped parking spaces, noting that one exists at Del Amo and Sycamore. The Director of Public Works responded that subject space was justifiably requested by adjacent residents. The Direc- tor added that there are presently four or five specialized handi- cappedparking locations City-wide, which are individually investi- gated by staff as each request is submitted. 75 2. HELICOPTER EMERGENCY LANDINGS AND MILITARY OVERFLIGHTS Councilman Kelly reported recent helicopter landings at the fire station which appeared to be practice maneuvers. The City Manager responded that staff is not aware of routine practice landings, other than emergency medical landings for transporting victims. He indicated staff would investigate the matter and report back to Council. Councilman Kelly was informed that military helicopters are exempt from complying with the City's noise ordinance. 101 3. LEASE OF WAR MEMORIAL BUILDING The City Attorney responded to Councilman Kelly that a report is forthcoming regarding his concern that the War Memorial building {owned and operated by a non-profit organization) is being leased to The Learning Village preschool {for-profit corporation}. 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 2-17-87 4. POTHOLE ON ANA TREE PLACE Mayor Pro Tem Hoesterey reported that the pothole he reported three months ago on Ana Tree P1 ace and Rai ntree has not yet been repaired. He suggested staff forward a friendly letter to the Irvine Ranch Water Districl~ requesting repair of same. 95 5. CESSATION OF USMC CH-53E HELICOPTER FLIGHTS Mayor Saltarelli reported that the Marine Corps announced cessation of CH-53E helicopter flights. They may have found a problem in the aircraft's gear box which will be modified. He stated he feels the Council made an accomplishment on the matter. He expressed hope and wishes that it is a problem which can be corrected and make the aircraft safer. 103 6. MAJOR SANTA ANA DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO TUSTIN CITY LIMITS The Mayor focused attention to a major office proposal in the City of Santa Aria at the intersection of the Santa Ana Freeway, Fourth Street, and First Street. It is reportedly a massive proposal con- sisting of one 21-story and two 15-story office towers, with one 8-story parking garage. The Community Development Director responded to Mayor Saltarelli that staff has been informed that there will be no environmental review on Phase I, and an environmental impact report (EIR) will be prepared on Phases II and III (the remaining 700,000 square feet of the project). The Mayor stated that a project of such magnitude should not proceed until there is assurance that it will not adversely impact Tusti n. The City Manager responded that staff has been in contact with Santa Ana city officials. There is a difference of opinion on whether they should do an EIR; staff is presently reviewing a report they have done on traffic; and staff thinks the issue of whether the buildings will affect the VOR to John Wayne Airport has been resolved, and is asking for documentation on same. Staff and the City Attorney would like to review the project, and report back to Council on what options are available. The Mayor stated that if the time frame is such that building per- mits are about to be issued prior to Council review of unmitigated adverse impacts, a special meeting of the City .CounciT ~ll be con- ducted on the matter. 81 7. TUSTIN FRENCH QUARTERS - 17TH STREET The Commun i ty Development Di rector responded to Counci 1 woman Kennedy regarding progress of the restaurant construction in the Tustin French Quarters shopping center on 17th Street. She offered assurance that "bureaucratic details" have not held up progress as noted by the Editor of The Tustin News. The Director stated that staff has been awaiting plan submittal from Tony Roma's for weeks and has been in constant communication with the developer on the matter. It is expected plans will be submitted in the next week. Councilwoman Kennedy stated that the concern is not only the length of time the project has sat there in an odd state, but the lack of compliance with existing architecture of the center. The Director indicated she would be happy to speak to constituents on the mat- ter. 81 8. MITCHELL AVENUE - HEATHERFIELD DRIVE TRAFFIC CONCERNS Councilman Edgar requested that staff agendize subject matter for Council consideration within the next two meetings, (On October 6 Council direted staff to send a letter questionnaire to all poten- tially affected residents along Heatherfield Drive to determine how many residents would be in favor of a permit parking program.) 75 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 2-17-87 9. CAPITAL INPROVEI4ENT PROJECTS Councilman Edgar commended the Director of Public Works for con- tracting with a consultant firm some engineering design services (see New Business Item No. 4) and encouraged staff to do more of the same. He stated that inability to complete design work is not in the City's best interest in terms of constructing projects for which funding exists. He expressed a desire to have a competent contractor who could pro- vide "shelf-ready" projects allowing the City to award projects based upon availability of funds, rather than on availability of staff time to complete the engineering design work. He was not adverse to expending funds for same. Councilman Edgar also felt it wise to conduct a Council workshop in the near future to review :capital improvements for the 1987-88 budget. The City Manager responded that staff would come back with a proposed schedule for same. 86 10. KUDOS TO FINANCE DIRECTOR The Mayor complimented the Finance Di rector on the excellent finan- cial reports recently received by Council. 50 11, REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MayorSaltarelli announced that there will be a Council Reorganiza- tion at the March 2, 1987, meeting. 38 XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - ADJOURNMENT At 9:20 p,m., it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to recess to a meeting of the Redevelopment Agency; and thence adjourn to the next Regular Meeting on March 2, 1987, at 7:00 p.m, Carried 5-0.