HomeMy WebLinkAbout14 U-TURN RESTRICTION 03-18-96AGEN
NO. 14
3-18-96
DATE:
MARCH 18, 1996
Inter-Com
TO:
FROM:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION
SUBjECT:REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF U-TURN RESTRICTION AT JAMBOREE ROAD/IRVINE
BOI. II~V~
..RECOMMENDATION:
\
It is recommended that the City Council, at their meeting of March 18, 1996, reconfirm the existing U-turn
restriction for northbound traffic at the intersection of Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard.
FISCAL IMPACT:
At this time, there is no fiscal impact to the City regarding the preparation of this report.
associated costs are as follows:
Alternative No. 1. = $ 0
Alternative No. 2. = $15,000.00
Alternative No. 3. = $1,000.00
Alternatives and
BACKGROUND:
At the March 4, 1996 City Council meeting, Mr. Charlie Mazza, a local business owner and resident of the
City of Orange, requested the removal of the existing northbound U-turn restriction at the subject intersection
to provide more convenient access to the Tustin Ranch Plaza Shopping Center, located at the southwest corner
of Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard.
DISCUSSION:
Prior to the request from Mr. Mazza, l~he Engineering Division had received a similar request fi-om Mr. Richard
Jeanette, Store Manager for Payless Drug Store (March 1995), and fi-om Ms. Mary Ann Crowe, Shell Service
Station Manager (August 1995). Both parties were notified that staffwould be investigating the possibility of
removing the subject U-tum restriction.
The subject U-turn restriction was originally installed with construction of the traffic signal at the interSeCtion
of Jamboree Road/lrvine Boulevard in 1988. The purpose for restricting the U-turn movement 'in the
northbound Jamboree Road direction was to eliminate conflicts with the right-turn overlap movement in the
eastbound Irvine Boulevard dkection. The right-tum overlap movement was determined to be needed to
maintain future acceptable levels of service at the intersection as part of the traffic analysis performed for the
East Tustin Specific Plan EIR. Although the overlap feature was not needed at the time of installation it was
installed due to the aggressive development economics in 1988, with the feeling that it would be needed in the
very near future.
The right-turn overlap feature provides a signalized right-tum movement concurrent with an opposing le~tum
movement. This in mm provides for more traffic movement through an intersection, thereby increasing the
intersection capacity and effidency. The attached exhibit indicates the phase sequencing of the traffic signal at
Request for removal of U-Turn Restriction at Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard
March 18, 1996
Page 2
Jamboree Road/lrvine Boulevard and identifies current AM and PM peak-hour volumes. It can be derived
fi.om the exhibit that if the eastbound Irvine Boulevard right-mm movement was restricted to provide the left-
mm/U-mm movement in the northbound Jamboree Road direction, then vehicles waiting to make the fight-
mm could potentially stack up, thereby blocking the most easterly Irvine Boulevard access driveway into the
Tustin Ranch Plaza site. '
In 1991 this intersection was identified as part of the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP)
Highway System. As such, this intersection is expected to accommodate significant levels of regional traffic as
well as local traffic. CMP guidelines established level-of-service (LOS) ~E' as the minimum criteria for
intersections. The City of Tustin is required by State of California CMP legislation to routinely monitor traffic
LOS at this location and assume responsibility for mitigating unacceptable levels-of-service. If traffic levels are
allowed to deteriorate to unacceptable conditions, it could jeopardize future transportation funding
opportunities for the City.
During the review process for the Tustin Ranch Plaza Development in 1994, ingress and egress access was a
concern for the success of the project. Subsequently, the applicant prepared a traffic study which analyzed .the
project circulation system and concluded that the site had sufficient access with the addition of a previously
planned signalized intersection at the main entrance to the Tustin Ranch Plaza shopping center. The existing
traffic signal at Jamboree Road/Tustin Ranch Plaza was constructed with Assessment District 85-1 funds in
conjunction with the development of the shopping center. The traffic study also identified that the Jamboree
Road/Irvine Boulevard intersection was currently operating at LOS ~E' and additional traffic impacts fi.om the
Tustin Ranch Plaza project would not cause further level of service deterioration at this location.
In APril 1995 the Lower Peters Canyon (LPC) Specific Plan EIR was approved, which included development
of the area bounded by the I-5 Freeway to the south, Portola Parkway to the north, Jamboree Road to the
west, and Culver Drive to the east. The commercial/retail area of the LPC project is currently under
construction and the first residential development is currently being reviewed. The traffic study prepared for
the LPC project identified the future need for the existing right-turn overlap at the Jamboree Road/Irvine
Boulevard intersection. Furthermore, the preliminary traffic analysis being prepared for the MCAS-Tustin
Reuse project assumes the subject right-turn overlap.
In on-going conversations with Ms. Crowe of the Shell Station, she was made aware of the above information
and the explanation of the U, tum movement vs. right-tum overlap conflict. Also, the possibility of allowing U-
tums in the westbound IIMne Boulevard direction at Myford Road was discussed, and based upon current
conditions and future planning information, was subsequently implemented. It was hoped that by allowing the
U-tums at Irvine Boulevard/Myford Road this would provide opportunity for users of the Tustin Ranch Plaza
who turned left fi.om northbound Jamboree Road onto Irvine Boulevard to access back to the shopping center.
The modification at Irvine Boulevard/Myford Road was implemented in February 1996, and assessment of it's
impacts may be premature at this time.
ALTERNATIVES:
Three (3) alternatives have been identified to address the U-turn traffic movement concerns at the Jamboree
Road/Irvine Boulevard intersection:
Request for Removal of U-Turn Restriction at Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard
March 18, 1996
Page 3
Alternative No. 1.
Reconfirm the existing U-turn restriction for northbound traffic at the subject intersection.
* No cost to the City.
* Implements future traffic signal system planning based upon previously approved
environmental documents as well as preliminary MCAS Tustin Reuse planning documents.
* Complies with CMP mandates.
Alternative No. 2.
Allow U-turn movement for northbound traffic at subject intersection.
* Cost approximately $7,500.00 to remove eastbound Irvine Boulevard right-turn overlap
feature fi.om traffic signal, and approximately $7,500.00 to re-install same at a latter date.
Total cost = $15,000.00
* Would require monitoring to determine when right-turn overlap movement would need to be
re-installed. At time of installation, U-turn movement for northbound traflie would need to be
restricted.
* Would require monitoring for CMP compliance.
* Has potential to cause vehicle stacking across easterly most driveway on Irvine Boulevard to
Tustin Ranch Plaza.
'Alternative No. 3.
Allow U-turn movement for northbound traffic at all times except during the peak-hours at the subject
intersection.
* Cost approximately $1,000.00 to install equipment relay, rewiring, and speCial signs.
* Would require monitoring to determine when fight-turn overlap movement would be needed
full time.
* Could cause driver confusion due to time restrictions for turn movements possibly increasing
accidents at subject location.
Would require monitoring for CMP compliance.
CONCLUSION:
Current traffic volumes utilizing the Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard intersection indicate a LOS [E' in the AM
peak-hour. However, the volume of right-turning traffic in the eastbound Irvine Boulevard direction is not
sufficient to warrant the current right-mm overlap condition that is causing the need for the U-turn restriction
in the northbound Jamboree Road direction.
The City recently modified the traffic signalization at Irvine Boulevard/Myford Road to allow U-tums
speCifically to ac~odate traffic needing to turn around and proceed the opposite direction on Irvine
Boulevard toward the Tustin Ranch Plaza shopping center.
It is anticipated, based upon current planning information, that the subject right-turn overlap will be needed in
the very near future with the opening of the LPC commercial/retail shopping center on Jamboree Road across
fi.om the Tustin Market Place. Also, preliminary traffic information for the MCAS-Tustin Reuse project
assumes the subject fight-mm overlap in place.
Request for Removal of U-Turn Restriction at Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard
March 18, 1996
Page 4
Therefore, it is not felt to be prudent at this time to remove the right-mm overlap thereby accommodating U-
turns to 'offer only temporary relief since it will need to be changed back to a no U-turn situation shortly
thereafter in order to accommodate furore inevitable traffic. It is staffs recommendation that the City Council
support Alternative No. 1, reconfirming the existing U-turn restriction at the Jamboree Road/Irvine Boulevard
intersection.
Tim D. Serlet
Dkector of Public Works/City Engineer
TDS:DA:cc: No H-Turn Jamboree-lrvine
Douglas 1~. Anderson
Transportation Engineer
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
/
/
/
I!
.×
N,,
ttt~~' 4
301
1,029
IRVlNE
BI_ VD. IFIVlNE
AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES
JAMBOREE ROAD
II
IRVINE BLVD.
INTERSECTION PHASE SEQUENCE