The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01 ZA REPORT CP 2015-001 DR 2015-002 VETERANS SPORTS PARK_SEE ZAA 15-005,�,,• psi ��4 aYC..AG NDA R PORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 17, 2015 TO: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ITEM #1 SUBJECT: CONCEPT PLAN 2015-001 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2015-002 VETERANS SPORTS PARK LOCATED WITHIN THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF TUSTIN CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: MCAS TUSTIN PLANNING AREA 1E, 1J, AND 2 OF TUSTIN LEGACY LOCATED ON VALENCIA AVENUE BETWEEN LANDSDOWNE AND SEVERYNS ROAD GENERAL PLAN: MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING: MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), AN ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT THAT CONCLUDED NO ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS WOULD OCCUR FROM APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT. PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 151629 151635 151645 AND 15183 OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES NO NEW EFFECTS WOULD OCCUR REQUEST: TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN VETERANS SPORTS PARK WITHIN THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: That the Zoning Administrator adopt Zoning Administrator Action (ZAA) No. 15-002 approving Concept Plan 2015-001 and Design Review 2015-002 for Veterans Sports Park within Planning Area 2, 1 E, and 1J of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. APPROVAL AUTHORITY: In accordance with MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Section 3.3.2 (Planning Area 1) of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan district regulations (as amended in SPA 2014-001, Ordinance No. 1450), uses such as ball fields, courts, playgrounds and other recreation facilities, private recreational facilities, public park, sports field lighting, nature center, and other civic and community center buildings are permitted uses. Section 3.3.3 (Planning Area 2) of the MCAS Tustin SP allows public parks, ball fields, courts, playgrounds and other recreation facilities as well as civic, cultural and community center buildings as permitted uses. Section 4.2.2 of the MCAS Tustin SP requires a concept plan to be prepared and submitted or updated for Zoning Administrator approval concurrent with the submission of a new development proposal except for Planning Area 2. Since the project involves Planning Areas 1 E, 1 J, a Concept Plan is required. Pursuant to Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9272, Design Review is required for review of building design, site planning and site development. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The City and South Orange County Community College District (SOCCCD) agreed to dispose a 4.5 -acre parcel (PA 1E and 1J) immediately adjacent to the future park to potentially accommodate a portion of the future park site. The Master Plan acquisition of the property for Veterans Sports Park was approved by the City Council on June 17, 2014. Subsequently, on November 4 and 18, 2014, the Tustin City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1450 for SPA 2014-001 which amended permitted uses to include park related uses within Planning Area 1 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan to accommodate a portion of the City's Community Park Master Plan, which encompasses 31.5 acres (Figure 1). Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 3 j CITY RRWAT E PROPERTY Owl OF �O WAS GARY (IN REUSE PLAN) T lSTlN USTIN CO TER t 1 1✓w � M1 SCRR"OCT',6 RAEt. WAY _ ' 9-inn+.i�t�,n:,.I.M�I�-�.yn.x.skks.+4vw.i1=:_:w 4 c_a:.v..sra¢M'-a" .... .... ...: _ . i. `r'-•,�.':_.:. �-f�,. r..{� �a.�r i.,�.w-:-t � �... ti..� .,� R0 A , PA ROADs PROPOSED PARK SITE ur-VkFNVAM AVE i PA 6 3 A 3 A1Ean A 2 1J - - CITY OF �* SANTA ANN. ti T t. PA 2 @+4F2R!" r _ �.. - a 3I Y L r, Y l� E;> 0I _>":>IRVIN Figure 1 — Veteran's Sports Park Planning Areas Project Description The proposed 31.5 acre park site is bordered by Landsdowne Road to the west, Severyns Road to the east, Valencia Avenue to the south and an industrial center to the north. The park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities including four (4) lighted soccer fields, three (3) lighted ball fields, four (4) lighted tennis courts, two (2) lighted basketball courts, two (2) lighted sand volleyball courts and eight (8) lighted pickleball courts, a skate plaza and future IRWD well site (See Figure 2). A Veteran's Plaza and memorial, designed as a place of honor, will be located at the west side of the park. The park will also contain a children's play environment with a tot lot, a splash pad and picnic facilities. Two large expanses of open space will be available for passive recreation play and activities. Two restroom facilities will accommodate all the intended uses, as well as concession and storage areas and an office space for City staff. Two on-site parking lots will provide approximately 450 parking stalls, including accessible spaces per the latest ADA standards. Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 4 It A: ion IRWD well site - ! R '7V; 4 a d FE S Ai"E PLA XA SPAC Ag a. Q, r lam.. e T AN MEAT AREA L Figure 2 — Tustin Legacy Park Concept Plan An IRWD groundwater well site will be located at the northwest corner of the property. The well site will also include irrigation piping and sprinklers to maintain landscaping on the site (see Figure 3). Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 5 Figure 3: Proposed Groundwater Well ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS: The Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report included an inventory of the City's current facilities, the completed Needs Assessment Survey, existing and current use patterns of City facilities, constraints and restriction of the property, three proposed park designs and conclusions from the park inventory and survey. The 31.5 acre Veteran's Sports Park proposal is consistent with the City Council approved Disposition Strategy for MCAS Tustin, and would not increase the overall development potential, intensity, or residential capacity currently allowed by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. Lighting for the park will include LED passive lighting throughout, high quality sports field lighting on 80 foot poles, and hard court lighting on 25-30 foot poles. Lighting will be monitored and managed by on-site staff and set to timers with a curfew of 10 PM which is consistent with all lighted Tustin park facilities. Lighting will be located centrally on the site with a buffer of the passive recreation area and fitness stations between the park and the neighboring residential uses. A photometric study will be prepared as part of the development plans. Based on these implementation strategies and the mitigation to prepare a photometric study, it is not anticipated that the lighting will have any negative impacts. Parking for the sports park was analyzed in the Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report. It was determined based on analysis of each of the proposed sports uses, that approximately 450 parking stalls would provide adequate parking for the sports park. Further, the Public Works traffic engineering division has determined that the development for the park would not result in any new traffic impacts. Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 6 General Plan Consistency The site has a General Plan Land Use designation of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, which includes park facilities as an acceptable use within the designation. Therefore, the sports park use is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan General Plan Land Use Element designation. In addition, the proposed park supports the following General Plan Land Use Element Goals and Policies: • Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. • Policy 1.11: Where feasible, increase the amount and network of public and private open space and recreational facilities which will be adequate in size and location to be usable for active or passive recreation as well as for visual relief. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Planning Area 1E and 1J permitted uses to include park related as adopted by Ordinance No. 1450 for SPA 2014-001. Planning Area 2 allows for Community Park as a permitted use. Findings The location, size and architectural features of the park will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, the occupancy thereof or the community as a whole in that the following findings can be made: • The proposed project is consistent with the current overall development potential, allowed by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Urban Design Guidelines as set forth in the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan including massing and siting of development has been incorporated into the design process of the sports park. • The Proposed Project would not cause aesthetic impacts that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. • The amenities and site layout of the park has been designed with passive area adjacent to residential uses to minimize noise and lighting effects of the sports park. All lights will be equipped with shields to minimize potential glare to adjacent areas. In addition, the park has a 10:00 PM curfew in which all lights will be turned off and all activities will cease. These amenities, including landscape and hardscape theme and treatments, will create continuity and design quality of architecture and renovations. Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 7 • The parking analysis included in the Tustin Legacy Master Community Park Master Plan determined that the proposed 450 parking spaces will accommodate the proposed sports uses. • Public Works Department has reviewed potential traffic related to park use and has determined that there is adequate capacity to support the proposed use. • Continuity and adequacy of all circulation systems, such as roads, access points, trails, pedestrian ways and other infrastructure systems needed to serve the project pursuant to Concept Plan review criteria have been reviewed and found to be consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. • Pursuant to Sections 15162, 151631 15164, and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines no new effects would occur. ENVIRONMENTAL: On January 16, 2001, the City certified the program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a Second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The FEIS/EIR along with its Addendums and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former MCAS, Tustin. An environmental checklist was prepared for the proposed project that concluded no additional environmental impacts would occur from approval of the project (Attached to ZAA 2015-002). The Environmental Analysis Checklist concludes that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment since the proposed project would not increase the overall development potential or residential capacity currently allowed by the adopted MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and that the FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement are sufficient for the proposed project. Furthermore, the sports park use for Planning Area 1E) 1 J and 2, such as ball fields, courts, playgrounds, lighted fields and buildings for civic, cultural and community centers are permitted. In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the checklist should be considered and found to be complete and adequate prior to approving the project as proposed. Zoning Administrator March 17, 2015 Page 8 Amy Stonich, Senior Planner Attachments: 1. Concept Plan (March 2015) and Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) 2. Exhibit A: Environmental Analysis Checklist 3. ZAA 2015-002 ATTACHMENT 1 MARCH 2015 CONCEPT PLAN VETERANS SPORTS PARK TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA NORTH 7%== 0 30' 60' 120' TuSTIN pi BALL ` SKATE :. fit, PLAZA TEES F " M k V -,i� y+ OPENAAEA ,Y _ , R E4 f0N S, Pir A � -. '"" ", E ' P"tjoN . �� •.+t.. : is .. \ ry + + , M is n "Av N' : •F n ti -40 3 s_5{{{ a + tustin legacy community park city of tustin The City of Tustin is seeking to adopt a Master Plan for the development of the 31.5 -acre park at Tustin Legacy. The City sought interest from highly qualified firms with experience, creativity and demonstrated capability to assist the City in determining the scope, needs and design features for the park. With the adoption of the 2004-05 FY Capital Improvement Plan, the Tustin Legacy Park Master Plan project was scheduled. At that time the proposed park site was 24 -acres in size. It has since increased to 31.5 -acres. The City retained MIG, Inc. for the master planning design and architectural services. BACKGROUND The 31.5 -acre park site is located on the old Marine Corp Air Station (MCAS) on the southwest side of Tustin. The base is located between Red Hill Avenue and Jamboree Road. The Tustin Legacy Master Plan designates this site as a Community Park. The City proposes to utilize the 31.5 -acre parcel as a Community Park offering a variety of high intensity sports, recreation and passive opportunities. Tustin Legacy is the portion of the former MCAS - Tustin within the City of Tustin corporate boundaries. The MCAS -Tustin was commissioned in 1942 as a U.S. Naval "Lighter than Air" base, intended to support anti-submarine observation blimps and personnel that protected the southern California coast during World War II. The base was decommissioned by the Navy in 1949 and reactivated by the Marine Corps in 1951 as a a rota oduction introduction Aerial View of Site - 2003. Aerial View ofSire - 2013. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 3 chapter one helicopter base. Owned and operated Lwthe Navy and Marine Corps for nearly 6Oyears, approximately 1,585 gross acres of property at MCAS -Tustin were determined tobesurplus tothe Federal Government needs, and the air station was officially closed in July 1999. The majority of the facility lies within the southern portion ofthe City ofTustin. Approximately 73acres lie within the City ofIrvine. The portion o[the former MCAS -Tustin located within the City oFTustin has been re -named the Tustin Legacy project. AnEconomic Development Conveyance (EDC) for the former MCAS -Tustin was approved on May 13, 2002 with the execution of an agreement between the United States of America and the City ofTustin (the EDC Agreement).The EDC Agreement provided for the conveyance otapproximately 1153acres ofproperty to the City ofTustin. Ofthe 1'153acres tobeconveyed tothe City under the EDC Agreement, approximately 1'DOOacres have been deeded tothe City ofTustin, while approximately 152.4 acres are leased by the Navy to Tustin through a Lease in Furtherance of Conveyance (L|F[}{Jpending completion ofa Finding ofSuitability to Transfer (F(]ST)and approval bvthe State and Federal Environmental Regulators. The Tustin Legacy Community Park is within the L|FOC, leased property. LEASE RESTR|CT|ONVENV|RONMENTAL REMEDIATION Asmall portion ofthe Community Park site iscurrently within the portion ofthe UFOCparcel. This has not been conveyed to the City of Tustin and has been leased to the Old Building on Park Site. 4 1 rusr/w Lso^C, commuw/r, ,^nK City bvthe Department ofthe Navy. Aportion ofthe Tustin Legacy 31.5-acrepark site has been determined bvthe Navy assuitable for immediate re -use activities as long ascertain lease restrictions are met during any site use ordevelopment. Any improvement ofthe Community Park would have uzinclude all provisions ofthe UFC]C and laws, regulations and/or orders which may bepromulgated from time totime with respect tothe discharge and/ or removal of hazardous substances. There will also be restrictions prohibiting the release or disposal of any hazardous substances onthe site. The Navy has determined that soil and groundwater contaminationexistin-the westerly portion ofthe community park site. This requires the Navy to complete aresponse under CERCLAand install a long-term remediation system intended toprevent the migration of groundwater plume. Once a Finding ofSuitability toTransfer has been issued by the Department ofthe Navy, the remaining portion ofthe Tustin Legacy Community Park site will beconveyed to the City. Atpresent, the Navy believes itwill have completed installation ofthe required remediation system and obtained regulatory concurrence that the system is effective, sothat deed conveyance ofthis portion of the park might occur. OVERVIEW OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN / LEGAL DESCRIPTION The City ofTustin has adopted acompnehensive Specific Plan for the development of Tustin Legacy, the former MCAS-Tustin.The Specific Plan includes detailed planning, policies, regulations, implementation strategies, and even procedural criteria for the processing of development at Tustin Legacy. Tustin Legacy, through Section 9248ofthe Tustin Municipal Code, has its own zone district classification. Section 9246establishes the 5P-1 Specific Plan Zone District for the entire Tustin Legacy within the boundaries ofthe City. This, inessence, makes the Zone District, the Specific Plan, esthe zoning ordinance One of the most significant uses contemplated in the Specific Plan is the proposed Community Park, consisting of approximately 31.5 acres of land. The SP -1 designation allows for public park uses within this 31.5 - acre site. SITE DESCRIPTION The 31.5 -acre park site is bordered by Landsdowne on the north, McCain/Smith Rd. on the west, Severyns Road on the south and commercial/industrial properties on the east. The original site was operated as a community park by the Department of the Navy and the Marine Corps. Baseball fields, football fields, tennis courts and two racquetball courts were part of the original park's design. The park site also included the old officer's club and officer housing in a dormitory building. A portion of the park included a child care center, a small swimming pool, and an adjacent community building. An inventory of landscape specimens has determined there are no suitable species of trees, shrubs or landscape that should be retained. However, the City and Design Team will conduct a Horticultural Suitability Study with a Certified Arborist to determine if some of the large tree speciemens can be saved and used in the parks new design concept. There are currently limited utilities accessible to the site and no irrigation. Weed abatement and the Navy's remediation program for environmental cleanup are the only two activities that are occurring on the park site. Identified as Parcel 22 in the LIFOC document, this 31.5 -acre site will be part of the Legacy's entire open space system, where there will also be neighborhood parks, focal parks, perimeter greenbelts and increased landscape parkways. intro duction Above• Legacy Park Planning Map. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 5 tustin legacy community park city of tustin COMMUNITY OUTREACH The City of Tustin believes in community involvement in the design of their public facilities. Workshops were utilized to provide an opportunity to bring together a diverse audience and have them generate ideas. The City was interested in making sure that community stakeholders shared and gathered information to get the design work completed. The mixture of large group presentations and small group interactive sessions allowed for greater participation and encouraged open dialogue. The workshops were managed with strong facilitation to ensure there was good communication and active listening among attendees so that a consensus was reached. On April 21, 2004 and May 20, 2004, the City Parks and Recreation Department, in conjunction with MIG, Inc. (formerly Purkiss Rose -RSI), conducted a preliminary planning process for the Tustin Legacy Park. The planning process included discussions on history and awareness; site analysis review; and an overview of the City-wide recreation needs and deficiencies. At both meetings, breakout groups were assigned to review wish lists/desires and concerns and to present group priorities. Following the first public workshop on April 21, the prioritized concerns included adequate parking as the number one concern. In sequence, the additional concerns were lighted sports fields; public transportation and access; operations and maintenance; traffic control; safety and security; and restrooms. planning process (A-11APTER TWO planning process Existing Site, 204' The prioritized list of desires at the first workshop included, beginning with the number one priority, lighted sports fields; skate park; Veteran's Memorial; aquatic facility; community center; amphitheater; a multi -sports facility for indoor and outdoor use; tot lot; barbecue and picnic shelters; and a dog park. During the second workshop, on May 20, it became evident that additional desires and rankings needed to be reviewed. The amphitheater ranked higher during the second meeting, and the skate park ranked considerably lower. While a 31.5 -acre site is a considerable size for a Community Park, it became obvious it could not TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 8 chapter -Lw# accommodate all the amenities requested by those who attended these two workshops. While the Parks and Recreation Department made every effort to bring to the Parks and Recreation Commission some conceptual designs for a master plan, it was obvious that consensus among our community stakeholders could not be reached. While the priority list of desires effectively defines those amenities that should be considered for our park improvements at the Tustin Legacy Park, it became apparent that additional considerations needed to be reviewed prior to developing a master plan for this specific park. Those additional considerations included: ■ The identification of existing City resources and our deficiencies ■ A review of the plan currently proposed by the Master Developer of Tustin Legacy, called Tustin Community Partners No further workshops were scheduled until such time as a City-wide Community Needs Assessment Survey was completed. City staff, in conjunction with the Landscape Architect, began to prepare data to clearly identify support information to conduct the next community workshop. On November 16, 2005, the Parks and Recreation Commission conducted a community workshop with approximately 60 people in attendance. The workshop brought together many of the same stakeholders with additional new community residents to generate ideas and comment on the three concepts that were created at the previous workshops. The workshop provided the history and awareness to establish a set of principles to provide output for our planners and Commission members to work toward the goal of adopting a master plan. This third community workshop provided information such as: ■ An inventory of the City's current facilities ■ The completed Needs Assessment Survey ■ The existing and current use patterns of city facilities ■ The constraints and restrictions of the property 9 1 TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK ■ The master developer footprint for the 700 acres at Tustin Legacy ■ The three proposed park designs ■ Conclusions from the park inventory and recent survey The stakeholders then broke into eight separate groups to review the three concepts and define preferences on site amenities. A matrix of the consensus of the group at the November 16 workshop is shown in Figure 1.1. On January 18, 2006, the Commission adopted revised Concept C and directed staff to prepare the Design Development Report. General consensus priorities were as follows: 1. Lighted Sports Fields 2. Larger fields and more open space for multiple uses, i.e., lacrosse, cricket and practice fields. I The use of existing buildings for historical significance. 4. No stadium seating, or seating on one side only to maximize open use of fields. planning process Figure 1.1. Public Input Matrix. venerai Consensus Majority of Groups preferred layout of Concept "C" Number 1 Lighted Sports Fields Number 2 Larger Fields and more open space for multiple uses (ie. Lacrosse, Cricket, practice fields) Number 3 Use of Existing Buildings for Historical Significance to the site and area Number 4 lNo Stadium Seating or Seating on one side to maximize open use of fields Following, in no particular order, are additional design comments provided by the stakeholders at the January 18, 2006 meeting: ■ Eliminate concrete walkways dissecting multi-purpose sports fields. ■ Design lighting on perimeter fields where possible to give groups more flexibility. ■ Maximize field sizes to 330'x 210' wherever possible. ■ Eliminate hedges and plantings between multi-purpose fields. ■ Provide grandstands on the easterly boundary of the premier field only. ■ Ensure that open turf space is flat and usable for multi -group practice. ■ Provide lighting for basketball courts and softball field. ■ Include the early childhood tot lot areas for younger age children near the community center. ■ Ensure that interactive and interpretive accessibility is available for the veterans' memorial. ■ In the concept design, provide an overlay for cricket play on the multi-purpose fields.. ■ Concession building should include public restrooms. ■ Place a group picnic area near the parking lot. ■ Place an equipment storage facility for non-profit organizations' sports activities and materials. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 10 chapter two The Commission received significant correspondence from representatives of the community. The consensus of that correspondence indicated that the Commission should adopt the recommended Revised Concept C, which is shown in Figure 1.2. Figure 1.2. Concept C, Adopted by the Commission on January 18, 2006. parking veterans Figure 1.8. Timeline. Base Economic Closure Downturn 1999 A Community Outreach, Adoption of Concept C 11 1 TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK In 2007, an economic downturn spurred the unfortunate onset of budget reductions, and the implementation of the Master Plan slowed significantly. However, over the next several years the City was still able to accomplish several major tasks (Figure 1.3). The City conducted an Architectural Assessment of the major buildings on the park site in 2008-09. Per their assessment, demolition of the officer's club, dormitories, and other ancillary structures followed. In 2010-12 a Geotechnical investigation of the park site was completed. The Geotechnical investigation was an integral step in the design process, as it provides vital information regarding the proper foundations for proposed structures and paving treatments. In 2013, the City met with Navy personnel to present the Preferred Concept Plan and the Geotechnical Study. This meeting helped clarify the requirements and criteria for future site development. The City also conducted land negotiations with SOCCCD for additional adjacent park land. This brought the park land total to 31.5 acres, and Concept Plan B-2 was developed to include the additional acreage. Minor improvements to that plan evolved over the next year, and in 2014 two public meetings (February 19th and March 19th) were held to present the plans and elicit comments and opinions from the community. After these meetings, the plan was further refined based on feedback from the Community Services Commission and the community. The refined Tustin Legacy Park Concept, shown in Figure 1.4, was then approved by the Community Services Commission. The final conceptual iteration of the park is described in detail in Chapter 3 of this report. 2�� Architectural Assessment, Demolition of Buildings 2003-B9 Tustin Legacy Park (31.5 -acres) Geotechnical Concept Investigation Approved A Meet with Navy, Land Acquisition, Concept B-2 Developed planning process 0 Figure 1.4. Tustin Legacy Park Concept, Approved 2014. MOVING FORWARD The Concept Plan will be presented to the City Council in Summer 2014 for their review. If approved, the next step will be the creation of Design Development and Construction Document Plans. These plans will be the ultimate blueprints for construction of the park. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 12 tust'lon legacy community park city of tustin Introduction The Tustin Legacy Community Park will provide a focal point for the entrance of the Legacy Development off Valencia Road and Red Hill Ave. The park is designed as a community park and as such will serve the active and passive recreational needs of the surrounding community. It will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities including lighted soccer fields, ballfields, tennis courts, basketball courts, sand volleyball courts and pickelball courts. It will also contain a children's play environment with a tot lot, a splash pad and picnic facilities. Two large expanses of open space will encourage users to take advantage of passive recreation play and activities. Two restroom facilities will accommodate all the intended uses, as well as concession and storage areas and an office space for city staff. The site will be easily accessible by motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists. Two on-site parking lots will provide approximately 450 parking stalls, including accessible spaces as per the latest ADA standards. This section describes the amenities and facilities planned for the site in the following order: Parking lots, Veteran's Plaza and Memorial, Children's Play Environment, Splash Pad, Group Picnic Facility, Lighted Tennis Courts, Lighted Basketball Courts, Multi -Purpose Sports Fields, Concession/Restroom Buildings, Lighted Ball Fields, Sand Volleyball Courts, Pickleball Courts, Fitness Station, Trail, Skate Plaza, Passive Recreation/ Open Space. ate design C H 1,.::ii r'" i n. R P :,v1, R E E site design Above: Tustin Legacy Park C,'onccpt, Approved 2014. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 16 chi ai P te9 Lhr e en - Abode: Veteran's Aleniorial Plaza Parking Parking Lots The park is designed to accommodate 456 parking spaces. City standards on required parking spaces are established and all required limitations and exceptions will be met. The parking lot will be designed to adequate parking lot aisle widths, space sizes, surface treatments, handicapped parking requirements and any additional parking lot design considerations. A minimum number of parking spaces shall be provided for uses such as the examples listed below: ■ Stadium Seating or Arenas: One parking space for each four seats. ■ Tennis or Racquetball Courts: Four parking spaces are required for each court. ■ Basketball Courts: Six spaces are required for each court. ■ Multi -Purpose Fields or Active Sports Facilities: One for each employee and one additional for each 200 sq. ft. of gross play area. 17 1 TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK The City of Tustin`s parking lot standards require all uses in a recreational or open space or park setting to calculate parking based upon the total sum of the required parking spaces for each use. Portions of the parking lot may be improved with appropriate materials to satisfy NPDES requirements and to maintain and secure the remediation system for regulatory concurrence in compliance with deed conveyance. Veterans' Plaza and Memorial At the entrance to the park, a Veterans` Plaza and Memorial will be designed as a place of honor, reflection and thanks, and a memorial worthy of respect to honor all the veterans who served. The plaza will be designed with the following site criteria: It will be a visible and engaging site; accessible by bus routes and persons with disabilities; a contemplative site that engages participants to reflect and honor those who gave their lives and those who returned from battle. It will be located in a plaza area and be designated as an active, interactive opportunity. Appropriate benches, flag stanchions, and hardscape Above. Play Amenities will provide an opportunity for moderate sized ceremonies and Veterans' activities. Specific design features for the Veterans' Plaza will be coordinated prior to the development of plans and specifications with our local Veterans Affairs and Veterans of Foreign Wars organizations. Children's Play Environment Creating open turf areas for general public use was high on the list of priorities. The Children's Play Environment will be placed in proximity of the pavilion and a large open space for impromptu play and recreation. The children's play features will include separate zones for ages 2-5 years, and 5-12 years. These play zones will be furnished with modular type equipment with elevated and at grade play elements for full access. Resilient surfacing will meet consumer product safety commission standards and consist of either engineered wood chips or rubberized poured in place surfacing. Play Environment design in the City of Tustin provides that the following elements be strongly considered in the amenities selection: ■ Include shade trees or shade structures to protect children from the sun. ■ Provide additional swings to complement the design. ■ A water bubbler or small water apparatus is an attraction. ■ Height, motion and enclosure are key components of play value design. Splash Pad Splash pads are a great way to involve children and youth in water play without the economic and maintenance burdens of a swimming pool/aquatic facility. The zero -depth nature of the splash pad playscape eliminates standing water and prevents drowning, as well as the need for a lifeguard. They are equipped with non-skid surfaces and offer a huge variety of water play features to choose from including: fountains, buckets, cannons, sprayers, micro -sprayers, slides, misters, jets, and more. Elements are typically designed to be colorful, thematic and/or contemporary. Splash pads are fun for all ages, accessible to children of all abilities (designed to meet ADA requirements), Above: Aqua Donee Below left: Lighted Tennis Courts Below right.- Lighted Basketball Courts and a great way to promote physical activity and social interaction. The splash pad will be located next to the Children's Play Environment. Group Picnic Facility Larger gatherings can find shelter in the group picnic area and facility, easily accessible in the open turf area near the parking lot. The shelter can be designed with either a pre -manufactured design or a trellis structure. It should be a minimum of 60' in diameter, with concrete tables, lockable receptacle outlets, security lighting, barbecues and sink area, and should be able to accommodate approximately 100 people. TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 18 The group picnic facility programmatically should be able to be reserved as an independent park amenity. Lighted Tennis Courts Four lighted tennis courts are designated to be placed near the southeast corner of the park, close to Severyns Road. Parking will be available in the southeasterly parking lot. The courts are oriented true north in a northwest/southeast direction, which helps minimize players looking directly into the sun during the winter months. The courts will be fenced and available for reservation and lighted for night play. The courts will be designed with a high-quality non -porous surface, paved with color coating, for lasting durability. Lighted Basketball Courts Two lighted basketball courts will be located near the southeast corner of the park, near Severyns Road. They will be directly accessible from the southeasterly parking lot. They will be designed with a non -porous surface and paved with color coating. These regulation basketball courts will be lighted for night play. A general, drop-in program is designated. The basketball court design may include a modular sport surface based on an orthopedic surface concept of reducing both lateral and vertical stresses. A modular sport surface may also be prepared to meet certain lease restrictions for re -use activities in the remediation of the groundwater plume. Multi -Purpose Sports Fields Four (4) multi-purpose sports fields are designated for the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the commercial/industrial properties. The four fields will be designated as 330' x 210'. A concession building with restroom facilities will be located next to the fields. Parking will be accessible in the southwesterly parking lot. 7©p: ConcessionlRestroom Building Bottom: Multi - ,purpose lighted fid 1s 19 1 TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK Top: Ball Meld Bottom: Dugout These four fields are designated for multi-purpose sports activities such as soccer, lacrosse, football, and field hockey. A portion of one of the fields can also be utilized as part of the cricket field overlay. These fields will be lighted for night play, with design considerations for ease of programming and maintenance. The light poles will be placed along the perimeter of the fields. Playing surfaces will be determined prior to the development of plans and specifications. Artificial turf and other surfaces will be considered as part of a long term low maintenance operation and to meet the requirement of the lease restrictions for environmental remediation. Concession / Restroom Buildings Public restrooms will be made available near the active sports facilities in the central portion of the park, and at the ball fields which are immediately adjacent to the other multi-purpose courts. The restroom buildings will provide easy access to participants and spectators. xt d e s i a n �o The ADA accessible restroom facilities will be designed to accommodate the capacity of maximum participant and spectator attendance. The restrooms should include sinks and lavatories for both men and women. A family restroom with baby changing station should also be considered. Stainless steel fixtures, countertops and wash facilities should be included in the design of the facilities. The concession stands will offer food and beverages for the convenience of spectators and participants. No designation for the operation of the concession stand has been determined at this time. The concession portion of the building is estimated to be approximately 200 to 500 sq. ft., with the restroom portion of the building to be approximately 1200 sq. ft. Architectural design of the restroom/concession building will be determined prior to the preparation of plans and specifications. Lighted Ball Fields Along Valencia Avenue, in between the two parking areas, is a ball field complex with three (3) ball fields. There is one (1) 300' field complete with backstop, skinned infield, at grade dugouts with shade covers and bleachers that provide an opportunity for youth and adult play. In addition there are two (2) 200' fields that will also include backstops, skinned infields, dugouts and bleachers. In between the fields are bull pens for pitchers to warm-up and/or practice during game time, and batting cages for pre -game and practice. All of the fields will be lighted for maximum use. A small play environment is situated next to the ball fields, so that younger siblings and other spectators can stay entertained during ball games and practices. The surface of the field will be evaluated prior to the development of plans and specifications. Artificial turf could be a consideration for long term maintenance and to meet the lease restrictions for environmental remediation. CROWN VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK NEEDS ASSESSMENT 120 chapter IIr e e Above: Pickleball C.otrts Sand Volleyball Court The sand (beach) volleyball court will be located in the center of the site, south of the multi-purpose fields and north of the ball fields. There will be two (2) courts located side-by-side. These courts will contain high quality beach volleyball sand (not golf course bunker sand or washed masonry sand). The court will contain a playing area and surrounding safety space. The playing area will be level and consist of a depth of sand which prevents players from contacting the underlying surface. Pickleball Courts Originated as a backyard pickup game in the mid 1960's, Pickleball has emerged as one of the fastest growing sports in North America. Popular among adults Pickleball is a fun game for players of all skill levels. The courts are similar in size to badminton (20`x44') for both single and doubles matches with a net is hung 36" high in the middle from end to end to resemble a small tennis court. The game is played with a ball similar to a wiffleball and a paddle. Eight lighted Pickleball courts will be located adjacent to the tennis facility in the southeast corner of the park, near Severyns Road. Parking will be available in the southeasterly parking lot. The courts will be oriented true north to help minimize players looking directly into the sun during the winter months. Courts will be completed fenced, lighted and available for reservations and possibly tournament play. The courts will have a high-quality non -porous surface, paved with color coating for lasting durability. 21 1 TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK Fitness Stations The fitness stations will be situated adjacent to the tennis courts and pickle ball courts. The concept plan shows a variety of stations laid out circuit -style, so that users would be able to travel quickly and easily from one station to the next. The variety of machines assures that all levels of fitness and mobility can be accommodated. Fitness stations provide many health benefits and have the added scenic value of being outdoors. The stations are designed to provide a workout targeting specific muscle groups, similar to the workout provided by an indoor gym. Trail (D.G.) Encircling the soccer fields is a D.G. (Decomposed Granite) pedestrian trail. The trail can be used for active pursuits such as walking and jogging, as well as a means of getting from one area of the park to another. The D.G. surfacing will be ADA accessible to provide a safe route of travel for all. The trail will connect to the paved walkways that provide access into the site from Landsdowne Road, Severyns Road, and Valencia Ave. Top: Fitness &ation Equipment Bottow.D. C�'. Trail Skate Plaza Skateboarding is a great way to engage youth in active recreation. Skateboarding is a highly popular sport amongst a range of ages and levels of skill. Skate plazas offer a challenging and exciting form of exercise with very little maintenance. To achieve maximum durability, all of the materials used should be fixed into forms with grout and concrete. A professional skate park designer with experience and expertise should be consulted during the preparation of plans and specifications. Passive Recreation/Open Space There several areas within the park that are designed for passive recreation. A large open space is situated near the Children's Play Area and Skate Plaza. This area is convenient for laying out a blanket, flying a kite, throwing the dog a frisbee and many other leisurely activities. There is also a large passive recreation area to the east of the soccer fields, just north of the hard courts. This area would be ideal for watching a sporting event or relaxing between games. Throughout the park are landscaped areas, picnic tables and benches. All of which can be used to sit back, relax and enjoy the park experience. site design CROWN VALLEY COMMUNITY PARK NEEDS ASSESSMENT 1 22 tust'In legacy community park CI of tustin PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE General Construction $1,1391482.00 Mobilization Fine Grading Erosion Control Utilities Ballfields $1,1927,000.00 3 Fields Lighting Amenities Miscellaneous Paving & Trails $890"000.00 Paving Trails Lighting Signage Multi -Purpose Fields $2.1315jr000.00 4 Fields Lighting Amenities Courts $750,000.00 Basketball Tennis Pickleball Sand Volleyball Lighting Amenities Children's Play Environment $2,110,000.00 Play Equipment Passive Areas Par Course Equipment Veteran's Memorial Signage Amenities Parking Lots $2,1110,000.00 Small Parking Lot Large Parking Lot Buildings $650,000.00 Two Buildings Skate Park $396,1500.00 Lighting Amenities Miscellaneous Landscape & Irrigation $1,408,282.75 Soil Preparation Trees, Shrubs, Groundcover Irrrigation TOTAL $11,586,264.65 General Conditions $347,587.94 Design Contingency $11158,626.48 Total $13,092,479.17 Additive Alternate: Synthetic Turf @ Soccer Fields $3,120,000.00 cost estimate TUSTIN LEGACY COMMUNITY PARK 1 25 tustin legacy community park ci ty of tustin � � J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST For Projects With Previously Certified/Approved Environmental Documents: Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin This checklist of environmental impacts takes into consideration the preparation of an environmental document prepared at an earlier stage of the proposed project. The checklist and evaluation evaluate the adequacy of the earlier document pursuant to Section 15162 and 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. A. BACKGROUND Project Title(s): Concept Plan 2015-001 (CP 2015-001) and Design Review 2015-002 (DR 2015-002) Lead Agency: City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: Amy Stonich, AICP Phone: (714) 573-3126 Project Location: MCAS Tustin Planning Areas 2, IE, IJ of Tustin Legacy located on Valencia Avenue between Landsdowne and Severyns Road Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 General Plan Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Zoning Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Project Description: The City of Tustin is proposing to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities including four (4) lighted soccer fields, three (3) lighted ball fields, four (4) lighted tennis courts, two (2) lighted basketball courts, two (2) lighted sand volleyball courts and eight (8) lighted pickleball courts and a skate plaza. A Veteran's Plaza and memorial, designed as a place of honor, will be located at the west side of the park. The park will also contain a children's play environment with a tot lot, a splash pad and picnic facilities. Two large expanses of open space will be available for passive recreation play and activities. Two restroom facilities will accommodate all the intended uses, as well as concession and storage areas and an office space for City staff. Two on-site parking lots will provide approximately 450 parking stalls, including accessible s -paces per the latest ADA standards. The proposed sports park is consistent with the current overall development potential, intensity, and/or residential capacity allowed by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. Surrounding Uses: Northeast: Residential, Light Industrial, and Commercial. Northwest: Light Industrial, Commercial and Institutional/Educational Southeast: Industrial Southwest: Institutional/Educational Previous Environmental Documentation: On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEISS IR) for the reuse and disposal of AS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. And, on May, 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The FEIS/EIR along with its Addenda and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CFA). The IS/E , Addenda and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impactlas indicated by the checklist in Section D below. ❑Land Use and Planning ❑Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑Population and Housing [:]Noise ❑Geology and Soils ❑Public Services ❑Hydrology and Water Quality ❑Utilities and Service Systems ❑Air Quality ❑Aesthetics [:]Transportation & Circulation ❑Cultural Resources OBiological Resources ❑Recreation ❑Mineral Resources [:]Mandatory Findings of ❑Agricultural Resources Significance • I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. r-1 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. F] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, an 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Signcant Unless gated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. r-1 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. 9 =8 Amy Stonich, AICP, Senior Planner Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director FJJEFKVAV -P RNA No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: Impact Impacts Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [� �] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [� ❑ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? El 11. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? El b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 4:) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 111. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? El El b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) El El c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? El El d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? El El e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? El El a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: z") No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Analysis 1:1 F-1 E El 0 i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial Z) risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of Cn septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARD S AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 4:) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Zn No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous *0 Impact Impacts Analysis El EJ El El Z El El Z El El Z El Z g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 4'= injury or death involving wildland fires, including where Z:) wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, through h the alteration of the course of a Z) Z) stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on - or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation man'? Jr. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involvingtn flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? F1 E No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous ImpactLmlpacts f c Analysis ❑ F] 0 F1 E b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? El El No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous ni- Impact Impacts Analysis 1:1 El Z ❑ El Z El El Z El El I. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in Z:) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? tn F-1 b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ temporary d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing or without the project? El El Z e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excess noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and L-1 businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? El El Z XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection.? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION — a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? V. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC, — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C� k--1 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 4:) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses farm equipment)? (e.g.,C) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 1:1 F-1 No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Analysis c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 1-*-) 1:1 1:1 E XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection.? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION — a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? V. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC, — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C� k--1 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 4:) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses farm equipment)? (e.g.,C) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 1:1 F-1 F-1 F� 1:1 F-1 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs grams supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact_ Impacts Analysis 1:1 1:1 E F-1 1:1 H El 0 1:1 N E] 0 F1 of L = e-TOW11 On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Envi ron mental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a Second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The FEIS/EIR along with its Addendums and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin. The FEIS/EIR, Supplement, and Addendums analyzed the environmental consequences of the Navy disposal and local community reuse of the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin site per the Reuse Plan and the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Specific Plan). The CEQA analysis also analyzed the environmental impacts of certain "Implementation Actions" that the City of Tustin and City of Irvine must take to implement the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan proposed, and the FEIS/EIR analyzed, a multi-year development period for the planned urban reuse project (Tustin Legacy). When individual discretionary activities within the Specific Plan are proposed, the lead agency is required to examine the inddual activities to determine if their effects were fully analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The agency can approve the activities as being within the scope of the project covered by the FEIS/EIR. If the agency finds that pursuant to Sections 15162, 15163) 15164, and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines no new effects would occur, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects occur, then no supplemental or subsequent EIR is required. Tustin Legacy is located in central Orange County and approximately 40 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles. Tustin Legacy is that portion of the former MCAS Tustin within the City of Tustin corporate boundaries. Owned and operated by the Navy and Marine Corps for nearly 60 years, approximately 1,585 gross acres of property at MCAS Tustin were determined surplus to federal government needs, and MCAS Tustin was officially closed in July 1999. The majority of the former MCAS Tustin lies within the southern portion of the City of Tustin. The remaining approximately 73 acres lies within the City of Irvine. Tustin Legacy is in close proximity to four major freeways: the Costa Mesa (SR -55), Santa Ana (1-5), Laguna (SR -133) and San Diego (1-405). Tustin Legacy is also served by the west leg of the Eastern Transportation Corridor (SR 261). The major roadways bordering Tustin Legacy include Red Hill Avenue on the northwest, Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-0024 MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 2 Edinger Avenue on the northeast, Harvard Avenue on the southeast, and Barranca Parkway on the southwest. Jamboree Road transects the Property. John Wayne Airport is located approximately three miles to the south and a Metrolink Commuter Rail Station is located immediately to the northeast providing daily passenger service to employment centers in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Diego counties. The proposed sports park (Veteran's Sports Park) encompasses 31.5 acres. Specifically, Planning Areas 1E and U, and 2 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The I park is bordered by residential to the east and educational/institutional uses to the wesL with future facilities to be located to the south. Existing industrial/commercial uses are located to the north. The proposed project is consistent with the by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The sports park will offer a variety of high intensity sports, recreation and passive opportunities. It is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities including four (4) lighted soccer fields, three (3) lighted ball fields, four (4) lighted tennis courts, two (2) lighted basketball courts, two (2) lighted sand volleyball courts and eight (8) lighted pickleball courts, a skate plaza and future IRWD well site. A Veteran's Plaza and memorial, designed as a place of honor, will be located at the west side of the park. The park will also contain a children's play environment with a tot lot, a splash pad and picnic facilities. Two large expanses of open space will be available for passive recreation play and activities. Two restroom facilities will accommodate all the intended uses, as well as concession and storage areas and an office space for City staff. Two on-site parking lots will provide approximately 450 parking stalls, including accessible spaces per the latest ADA standards. An IRWD groundwater well site will be located at the northwest corner of the property. The well site will also include irrigation piping and sprinklers to maintain landscaping on the site. In accordance with MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Section(Planning Area 1) of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan district regulations (as amended in SPA 2014-001, Ordinance No. 1450), uses such as ball fields, courts, playgrounds and other recreation facilities, private recreational facilities, public park, sports field lighting, nature center, and other civic and community center buildings are permitted uses. Section 3.3.3 (Planning Area 2) of the MCAS Tustin SP allows public parks, ball fields, courts, playgrounds and other recreation facilities as well as cicultural and community center buildings as permitted uses. Section 4.2.2 of the MCAS Tustin SP requires a concept plan to be prepared and submitted or updated for Zoning Administrator approval concurrent with the submission Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 3 An Environmental Analysis Checklist has been completed and it has been determined that CP 2015-001 and DR 2015-002 (Project or Proposed Project) is within the scope o� the previously approved FEIS/EIR and that pursuant to Title 14 California Code o -l"' Regulations Sections 15162 and 15168(c), no new effects could occur, and no new gation measures would be required. Accordingly, no new environmental document is required by CEQA. The following information provides background support for the conclusions identified in the Environmental Analysis Checklist. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited t trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state sceni highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 1) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project would not cause aesthetic impacts that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. The Project proposes to permit the development of a community sports park with parking and amenities in Planning Areas 2, 1 E and U These uses were previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. If approved, the Proposed Project would allow development of Veteran's Sports Park within these planning areas of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan pursuant to the City's Community Park Master Plan. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to aesthetics and visual quality that would occur as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to aesthetics and visu ' al quality that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Proposed Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. No new gation measures are required in relation to impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. The implementation of the park use would continue the visual change from the abandoned military facilities onsite to a park use. Furthermore, the original site was operated as a community park by the Department of the Navy and the Marine Corp. Baseball fields, football fields, tennis courts and two racquetball courts were part of the original park's design. The new park will provide beneficial Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 4 impacts through development and improvement of the existing vacant land t benefit the community as set forth in the Tustin Legacy Community Park Maste Plan Report. Therefore, visual change is consistent with the City's Community Park Master Plan and overall,visual change of the former base to the larger Tustin Legacy development was not a significant impact in the FEIS/EIR. There are no designated scenic vistas in the Project area; therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. The Project Site is also not located within the vicinity of a designated state scenic highway. The Project would not change the conclusions of the historical analysis of the historic blimp hangars from the FEIS/EIR relative to visual changes since the Proposed Project would not affect these hangars. The project will have a new source of lights (sports field lights). These lights will have shields and timers with a curfew of 10:00 PM. These lights will nol adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to aesthetics. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR were certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: No new impacts or substantially more severe aesthetic impacts would result from the implementation of the Project; therefore, no new or revised mitigation measures are required for aesthetics and visual quality. No refinements related to the Project are necessary to the FEIS/EIR gation measures and no new gation measures are required. gation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums ,-?.nd Supplement; applicable measures will be recommended as conditions ol, et.ntitlement approvals. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-58 through 3-67, 4-81 through 4-92), Addendum 1 (Page 5-3 through 5- 7), and Addendum 2 (Page 24 through 26) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 5 Tustin General Plan Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewid Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to th Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resource Agency, to non-agricultural use? I b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Ac contract? i c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to thei, location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non agricultural use? I No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Project proposal is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of community facilities. There are currently no agricultural uses on the Site and there were no agricultural uses on the Site in the recent past. The original site was operated as a community park by the Department of the Navy and the Marine Corps. The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to agriculture and forest resources that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to agricultural resources that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. The impacts of the implementation of the Specific Plan are already analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. There is no new information relative to agricultural resources that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to ,i?-gricultural resources. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to agricultural resources. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 6 respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that requin major reons of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significan environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previousl). identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importanc( relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was no known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified al complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required.- In certifying the FEIS/EIR, the Tustin City Council adopted Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations on January 16, 2001 concluding that impacts to agricultural resources on other areas of MCAS Tustin were unavoidable (Resolution No. 00-90). No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-8 through 3-87, 4-109 through 114), Addendum 1 (Page 5-8 through 5 9), and Addendum 2 (Page 27 through 28) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) 111111. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations .9 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to %or construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001 Y DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 7 The Proposed Project was analyzed in the FEIS/EIR within the planned activities at Tustin Legacy. It was determined that the park use impacts would not cause impacts to air quality that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to air quality that would occur as a result of the implementation of the Project that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. There is no new information relative to air quality that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its a X implementation are consistent with and previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. As a result, no new' mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to air quality. The Tustin City Council adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the FEIS/EIR on January 16, 2001 to address significant unavoidable short-term (construction), long-term (operational), and cumulative air quality impacts for the Specific Plan. The City also adopted mitigation measures to reduce these unavoidable adverse impacts. Consistent with the findings in the FEIS/EIR, implementation of future development on the Project Site could result in significant unavoidable short-term construction air quality impacts because it is part of the "project" analyzed in the FEIS/EIR for which this finding was made. Construction activities associated with the Project Site were previously addressed in the FEIS/EIR. There is no substantial new information that shows there will be different or more significant short-term air quality impacts on the environment from the Project than described in the FEIS/EIR. There is no substantial new information that shows there will be different or more significant long-term and/or cumulative impacts on the environment as a result of the Project than described in the FEIS/EIR., Based on the foregoing, none of the condons identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or gation measures with regard to air quality. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required.- Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measures Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 8 will be recommended as conditions of entitlement approvals for future development of the site. However, the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement also concluded that Specific Plan related operational air quality impacts were significant and impossible to fully mitigate. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16 ,2001. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-143 through 3-153, 4-207 through 4-230, 7-41 through 7-42), Addendum 1 (Page 5-10 through 5-28), and Addendum 2 (Page 27 through 32) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) 11'11171 1 :111111•.1 N I P119jr-161t a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on -any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community idened in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and W'Ildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands al defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not fimitel:l to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, fillin hydrological interruption, or other means? I 1) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or a migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biologica�l resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the proons of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional'. or state habitat conservation plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 9 Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodat large group activities and offer a wide variety of faces. The proposed sports par is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. I The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to biological resources that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. The Project proposes to develop the same areas as proposed in the Specific Plan, City's Community Park Master Plan and previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to biological resources that would occur as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to biological resources that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts on biological resources. Based on current delineations of wetlands and jurisdictional waters, the Project will not affect wetlands or jurisdictional waters. The impacts resulting from the implementation of the Project, if any, would be those identified in the FEIS/EIR. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to biological resources. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the'severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-75 through 3-82, 4-103 through 4-108, 7-26 through 7-27), Addendum 1 (Page 5-28 through 5-39), and Addendum 2 (Page 33 through 35) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plar Page 10 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource as defined in §15064.5*7. 1 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064-59. 1 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or sit-, or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside form cemeteries? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. f he Proposed Project would not cause impacts to cultural resources that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. The Project proposes to develop the same areas as proposed in the Specific Plan and previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The impacts of the Specific Plan on cultural resources, including any that may be present on the Project Site, were considered in the FEIS/EIR. It is possible that previously unidentified buried archeological or paleontological resources within the Project Site could be discovered during grading and other construction activities. Consequently, future development is required to perform construction monitoring for cultural and paleontological resources to reduce potential impacts to these resources to a level of insignificance as found in the FEIS/EIR. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to cultural and paleontological resources. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 11 alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. �PitigafionlMonitofing Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tusti City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measure will be conditioned as part of entitlement approval. I Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-64, through 3-74, 4-93 through 4-102, 7-24 through 7-26), Addendum 1 (Page 5-40 through 5-45), and Addendum 2 (Page 36 through 37) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan V1. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effect including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1 Rupture of it known earthquake fault, as delineated on the mos S recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by th State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidenc I of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Speci 01 Publication 42. 0 Strong seismic ground shaking'i Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil^r c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (11994), creating substantial risks to life or property .9 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plar Page 12 Implementation of the Project would not cause any direct impacts to geology and soils. The Project proposes to develop the same areas as proposed in the Specific Plan and previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to geology and soils that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to geology and soils that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR as prepared. Therefore, the Proposed Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to geology and soils. The FEIS/EIR found that impacts to soils and geology resulting from implementation of the Specif ' ic Plan would include non -seismic hazards (such as local settlement, regional subsidence, expansive soils, slope instability, erosion, and mudflows) and seismic hazards (such as surface fault displacement, high- intensity ground shaking, ground failure and lurching, seismically induced settlement, and flooding'associated with dam failure). The FEIS/EIR concluded that compliance with state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, would avoid unacceptable risk or the creation of significant impacts related to geotechnical issues. No substantial change is expected during implementation of the Project from the analysis previously completed in the certified FEIS/EIR. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to geology and soils. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously idened effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or gation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. T171-ifigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measures will be made as conditions of entitlement approval. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-88 through 3-97, 4-115 through 4-123, 7-28 through 7-29), Addendum 1 (Page 5-46 through 5-49), and Addendum 2 (Page 38 through 40) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific is Page 13 Tustin General Plan a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? 4) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment throug reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving th release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 1) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? a e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area.) f) For a project wn the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project resu,it in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires, including where wildlands are adjacent t�s urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildiands? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MICAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MICAS Tustin Specific Plan. The entire MICAS Tustin site was reviewed for hazardous materials prior to start of redevelopment activities. Federal regulations require the Navy to complete remediation of hazardous materials prior to conveyance of properties to other landowners. Further, as set forth in the gation Monitoring report, prior t o - issuance of building permits, the City shall work closely with OCFA to ensure that Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 14 adequate fire protection measures are implemented in the project and eliminat any negative impacts on fire protection services (Mitigation Measures LU 2(o)(p)). The FEIS/EIR included a detailed discussion of the historic and then -current hazardous material use and hazardous waste generation within the Specific Plan area. The Navy has determined that soil and groundwater contamination exist in the westerly portion of the community park site. This requires the Navy to complete a response under CERCLA and install a long-term remedon system intended to prevent the migration of a groundwater plume. This area is currently within the Lease in Furtherance of Conveyance (LIFOC) pending completion of a Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) and approval by the State and Federal Environmental Regulators. Any improvement of the Community Park would have to include all provisions of the LIFOC and laws, regulations and/or orders which may be promulgated from time to time with respect to the discharge and /or removal of hazardous substances. Once a Finding of Suitability to Transfer has been issued by the Department of the Navy, the remaining portion of the Tustin Legacy Community Park site will be conveyed to the City. Therefore, the Navy is responsible for planning and executing environmental restoration programs in response to releases of hazardous substances for MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR concluded that the implementation of the Specific Plan would not have a significant environmental impact from the hazardous wastes, substances, and materials on the property during construction or operation since the Navy would implement various remedial actions pursuant to the Compliance Programs that would remove, manage, or isolate potentially hazardous substances in soils and groundwater prior to conveyance to the City of Tustin. Implementation of the Project will not cause any direct impacts to hazards and hazardous materials. There are no new or increased significant adverse project - specific or cumulative impacts with regard to hazards and hazardous materials that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to hazards and hazardous materials that was not in existence ,?.t the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts from hazards and hazardous materials. As idened in the FEIS/EIR, the Project Site is within the boundaries of the Airporj Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) and is subject to height restrictions. The Proposed Project is well within the 1 00 -foot height limitation included in the Specific Plan. The Project Site is not located in a wildland fire hazard area. Evaluation ofEnvironmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 15 The project site is not located within the 100 -year flood hazard areas. The project will not impair or interfere with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with •!'. • to hazards and hazardousSpecifically, circumstancesnot been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the • t require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measuresor alternatives that was not l and could not have been known wascertified as complete. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-106 throughi' through • • Addendum 1 (Page 5-49 through 5-55), and Addendum 2 (Page 44 through 47) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST) for Southern Parcels 4-8, 10- 2,14, and 42, and Parcels 25, 26, 30-33, 37 and Portion of 40 and 41 Finding of Suitability to Lease (FOSL) for Southern Parcels Care -out Areas i / Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) Tustin General •, Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 16 Vill. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: - Would the project: ,?-) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements"r b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff .9 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudf low? q 11111=1119 R 1 1111111 Le 41 KOJIFT1 Mur I� 1) Potentially impact stormwater runoff from post -construction activities? m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipmen) maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? o) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 17 p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park wn the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. An IRWD groundwater well site will be located at the northwest corner of the property. The well site will also include irrigation piping and sprinklers to maintain landscaping on the site. In accordance with "OC -58 Agreement", the City agreed to provide IRWD with a groundwater well site within a site proposed for a community park. IRWD has been granted an exclusive license to construct, use and maintain a groundwater well within the project site and a non-exclusive license to construct and maintain the well within the Construction/Maintenance Area. The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to hydrology and water quality. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to hydrology/water quality that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to hydrology/water quality that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to hydrology/water quality. As concluded in the FEIS/EIR, preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Project site in compliance with all applicable regulatory standards would reduce water quality impacts from development activities to a level of insignificance. The Project would not result in new or substantially more severe impacts to water quality than what was previously identified in the FEIS/EIR. The Project proposes no change to the drainage pattern and water management systems previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The drainage pattern and water management systems in the Project Site vicinity would remain consistent with the Tustin Legacy Master Drainage Plan. Therefore, the analysis and conclusions in the FEIS/EIR relative to impacts related to groundwater supply, groundwater levels, or local recharge have not changed. In addition, no change to the backbone drainage system is proposed. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts related to drainage patterns, drainage facilities, and potential flooding would result from the Project. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to hydrology and water quality. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 18 that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or gation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measures will be made conditions of entitlement approval for the Project. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-98 through 3-105, 4-124 through 4-129, 7-29 through 7-30), Addendum 1 (Page 5-56 through 5-91), and Addendum 2 (Page 48 through 51) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General P1,9 -A-1 1X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project. - a) Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of a agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited, t the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zonin ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating a environmental effect? I c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natu• r community conservation plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to land use and planning. There would be no change to development intensity, building height restrictions, setbacks, signage, and other development standards. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to land use and planning that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to land use and planning that was noi in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new gation measures are required in relation to impacts to land use planning. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 19 *A1 The Proposed Project is consistent with the Specific Plan and does not increase development intensities or introduce incompatible uses. Implementation of the Project would not physically divide any Specific Plan land use, conflict with the Specific Plan, or conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to land use and planning. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR were certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. Mitigation measures require the City to provide evidence of compliance with all requirements and standards of the City of Tustin City Code; applicable measures will be required prior to building permit issuance. Sources: FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-3 through through 4-13, 7-16 through 7-18), Addendum 1 (Page 5-92 through 5-94), and Addendum 2 (Page 52 through 54) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan 2,) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, IVICAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 20 large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports par is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. I There are no known mineral resources located at the site. The Project would not cause new impacts to mineral resources that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to mineral resources that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to mineral resources that was not a at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to mineral resources. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to mineral resources. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR were certified as complete. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-91), Addendum 1 (Page 5-95), and Addendum 2 (Page 55) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 21 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? z) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in thZ project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project wn the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels'.) No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The ambient noise environment on the site is influenced by the surrounding roadways, existing uses, a rail line located north of Edinger Avenue, and construction and remediation activities on surrounding parcels. The project will not increase the ambient noise level. Implementation of the Project will not cause any direct impacts to noise. The Project site is located next to (existing and future) residential, educational and institutional uses to the west, east and south. The design where passive uses and parking lot are located closest to residential uses was intentional to minimize noise and provide better accessibility to the public park uses within the 31.5 acre site. The project is not located within two miles of airports. No new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to noise are identified as a result of the approval and implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to noise that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Proposed Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new gation measures are required in relation to impacts to noise. The Project would not modify l land use distribution within the Tustin Legacy site. All proposed land uses were included in the Specific Plan. Consequently, long-term traff ic-related noise impacts associated with implementation of the Project have previously been identified and analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. Short-term noise impacts were also analyzed in the previously certified FEIS/EIR; implementation of any future project would be required to comply with applicable adopted mitigation measures and state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, thus avoiding significant short-term construction- related noise impacts. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 22 EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to noise. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions o� the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR were certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. New development within the reuse area shall ensure •that interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed those prescribed by state requirements and local City ordinances and general plans. Plans demonstrating noise regulation conformity shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits (Measure N-3). Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-15 through 3-162 and 4-231 through 4-243), Addendum 1 (Page 5-94w through 5-101), and Addendum 2 (Page 57 through 60) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to housing and any associated population. There is no new information relative to population and housing that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Proposed Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plar Page 23 result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to population d housing. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to population and housing. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. Ili i In eveci i s, 19 = 4 ri it1�! Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-18 through 3-34, 4-14 through 4-29, and 7-18 through 7-19), Addendum 1 (Page 5-101 through 5-111), and Addendum 2 (Page 61 through 62) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan ?-)Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the proon of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause signcant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: No Substantial Chancte from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to %or construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Proposed Project would require maintenance and operation management of the park. The construction of the proposed sports park will alleviate the overuse of the City's current sports park located in Tustin Ranch. There would be no Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 24 substantial change to development intensity, which would lead to an increased demand for public services. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to public services and facilities that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to public services and facilities that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to public services and facilities. F ire protection for the Tustin Legacy Site was discussed and analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The Project results in no changes to that previous analysis, and no increased or new environmental effects on the environment from those previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. Implementation of the Project requires compliance with existing OCFA regulations regarding construction materials and methods, emergency access, water mains, fire flow, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, building setbacks, and other relevant regulations. Adherence to these regulations will reduce the risk of uncontrollable fire and increase the ability to efficiently provide fire protection services to the Site. Pursuant to the FEIS/EIR, the existing fire stations in the Project vicinity with additional fire fighting personnel and equipment will meet the demands created by the Project and other development within Tustin Legacy. The City shall ensure that adequate fire protection measures are implemented in the Project, prior to issuance of a building permit (Mitigation Measure (p)). No new or expanded facilities were identified as being required and therefore no physical impacts were identified. Police protection for the project site was discussed and analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The Project results in no changes to that previous analysis, and no increased or new environmental effects on the environment from those previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. The City and Tustin Police Department will ensure that adequate security precautions are implemented in the project (Mitigation Measure (s)). However, Tustin Police Department has reviewed the Proposed Plan and it is anticipated that implementation of the Project would not increase the need for police protection services in addon to what was previously anticipated in the FEIS/EIR. The Project will not directly result in any residential development. Therefore, the Project does not generate K-12 students and there is no impact to K-12 schools. Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, D0MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 25 R_ Therefore there would not be a requirement to pay school fees for public uses o1i the Tustin Legacy site consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 50 of 1998. 1 • The Project is a permitted use in Planning Area 1 E, 1 J and 2 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and would have potentially beneficial impacts by providing additional opportunities for parkland. Parks for the project site were discussed and analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. A Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2-014) was prepared for the development of the 31.5 acre park. The plan is consistent with the City of Tustin Park Code and construction plans will be reviewed for further compliance as set forth in Mitigation Measure (u). The Project results in no changes to that previous analysis, and no increased or new environmental effects on the environment from those previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR. Other Public Facilities An IRWD groundwater well site will be located at the northwest corner of the property. The well site will also include irrigation piping and sprinklers to maintain landscaping on the site. The Proposed Project would not cause impacts to hydrology and water quality. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to hydrology/water quality that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to hydrology/water quality that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new gation measures are required in relation to impacts to hydrology/water quality. The FEIS/EIR concluded that public facilities would be provided according to a phasing plan to meet projected needs as development of the Specific Plan proceeded. The Project would not modify conditions or proposed development which was already analyzed in the previously approved FEIS/EIR; therefore, no substantial change is expected. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or gation measures with regard to recreation. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plar Page 26 known and could not have been now when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tusti City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums', and Supplement. Mitigation measure (m) through (x). No further mitigation is required. The Project will benefit resident and will relieve the use of the existing sports park at Tustin Ranch. I Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-47 through 3-57, 4-56 through 4-80 and 7-21 through 7-22), Addendum 1 (Page 5-112 through 5-122), and Addendum 2 (Page 63 through 65) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan Tustin Legacy Community Park Master Plan Report (June 2014) a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational faces, 'which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to ,C.onstruct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Proposed Project would not result in an increase of development intensity or change in uses that would result in increased use of existing parks or recreational facilities. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to recreation that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to recreation that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement was prepared. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to recreation. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to recreation. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plar Page 27 the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major reons of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could 'not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. gationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measures will be recommended as conditions of entitlement approvals. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-47 through 3-57, 4-56 through 4-80, 7-21 through 7-22), Addendum 1 (Page 5-122 through 5-127), and Addendum 2 (Page 66 through 67) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan Tustin General Plan XV. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traff ic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific PlaNt Page 28 Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park .�Is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. There are no net changes to the land use intensity or density and resulting trip generation then what was analyzed previously. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to transportation and traffic that are identified as a result of the implementation of the Project that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. Based on this analysis, there are no new or increased significant adverse project - specific or cumulative impacts with regard to traffic and transportation that am idened as a result of the implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to traffic and transportation that was not in existence at tI'M time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. As a result, no new mitigation measures ar;t required in relation to impacts to traffic and transportation. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to recreation. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Specific mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in certifying the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. However, the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement, also concluded that Specific Plan related traffic impacts were significant and impossible to fully mitigate. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement, was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-111 through 3-142, 4-139 through 4-206 and 7-32 through 7-42), Addendum 1 (Page 5-127 through 5-146), and Addendum 2 (Page 68 through 73) • of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MICAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 29 MICAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Page 3-35 through 3-62, Page 3-70 through 3-81, Page 3-82 through 3-88, and Page 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilitl"es, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? e) Have sufficient • supplies available to serve the project from • entitlements and resources, • are new or expanded entitlements needed? f) Result in a determination • the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity • serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? g) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal • h) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related tit solid • Would the project include a new or retrofitted storm water treatmen control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g. water quality treatmen I basin, constructed treatment wetlands), the operation of which coul result in significant environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors an odors)? No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MICAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Proposed Project would not result in an increase of development intensity or change in uses cause any direct impacts to utilities and service systems. There are no new or increased significant adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts with regard to utilities/services systems that are identified as a result of the Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001 7 DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 30 implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to utilities and service systems that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR. As a result, no new mitigation measures are required in relation to impacts to utilities and service systems. The FEIS/EIR identifies that the City will require certain conditions for future individual development projects identified as "Mitigation" or "Implementation Measures" (pages 4-43 through 4-46) to be complied with as appropriate. The Proposed Project will result in no substantial changes to the environmental impacts previously evaluated by the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. There is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR or other environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures with regard to utilities and service systems. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: Mitigation measures were adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement; applicable measures will be recommended as conditions of entitlement approvals. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 3-35 through 3-46, 4-32 through 4-55 and 7-20 through 7-21), Addendum 1 (Page 5-147 through 5-165), and Addendum 2 (Page 74 through 76) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Page 3-35 through 3-62, Page 3-70 through 3-81, Page 3-82 through 3-88, and Page 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, IVICAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 31 FAVRXIIIII[MKM a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of th environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlif species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustainin levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce th number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal o eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histor or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited buml cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly • indirectly? No Substantial Change from • Analysis. The Proposed Project is to construct and maintain a 31.5 acre sports park within the IVICAS Tustin Specific Plan. The proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodate large group activities and offer a wide variety of facilities. The proposed sports park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The FEIS/EIR previously considered all environmental impacts associated with the implementation • the i• Plan, including mandatory findings • significance Mssociated with the implementation of the Project. The Project would not cause unmitigated environmental effects that were not already examined in the FEIS/EIR; there are no new mitigation measures required; and there are no new significan) adverse project -specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas thal were identified, nor would any project -specific or cumulative impacts in any environmental areas be made worse as a result of the Project. All feasible mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR will be incorporated into subsequen") development project approvals. Further, none • the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 would trigger the `• to prepare a subsequent EIR to evaluate Project impacts • gation measures with regard to environmental impacts. Specifically, there have not been: (1) changes to the Project that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; (2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous FEIS/EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of i Evaluation of Environmental Impacts CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Page 32 previously identified effects; or (3) the availability of new information of substantial importance relating to significant effect or mitigation measures or alternatives that was not known and could not have been known when the FEIS/EIR was certified as complete. MitigationlMonitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR previously considered a environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Specific Pla Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/El 2nd would be included as conditions of approval of the project. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Page 5-4 through 5-11) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (Page 3-35 through 3-62, Page 3-70 through 3-81, Page 3-82 through 3-88, and Page 3-104 through 3-137) Tustin General Plan The above analysis concludes that all of the proposed project's effects were previously examined in the FEIS/EIR, Supplement, and Addendums, that no new effects would occur, that no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur, that no new mitigation measures would be required, that no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and that there are no new mitigation measures or alternatives applicable to the project that would substantially reduce effects of the project that have not been considered and adopted. A Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program and Findings of Overriding Considerations were adopted for the FEIS/EIR on January 16, 2001 , and shall apply to future development projects as applicable. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 15-002 CONCEPT PLAN 2015-001 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2015-002 VETERANS SPORTS PARK 111mil 1 i •FwT---!l ne• l 1. The Zoning Administrator finds and determines as follows: A. That, as part of the City's Community Park Master Plan, the City of Tustin is proposing to construct and maintain Veteran's Sports Park, a 31.5 acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan; specifically, Planning Areas 1 E and and 2; B. That the proposed park is designed as a community park and will accommodatft. large group activities and offer a wide variety of community amees; C. That the proposed park is consistent with the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan; D. That the proposed park supports the following General Plan Land Use Element Goals and Policies: Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. Policy 1.11: Where feasible, increase the amount and network of publi and private open space and recreational facilities which will be adequate i 1 size and location to be usable for active or passive recreation as well as fo visual relief. I E. MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Planning Area 1 E and 1 J permitted uses to include park related as adopted by Ordinance No. 1450 for SPA 2014-001. Planning Area 2 allows for Community Park as a permitted use. F. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on March 17, 2015, by the Zoning Administrator; G. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the program Fin Environmental Impact Statement/Envi ron mental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) fo the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the Cit Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS/E for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the futu alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On April 3, 2006, the City Counc r adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, o May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving Second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The FEIS/EIR along with its Addendum Zoning Administrator Action 11 -OO@ CP'2O15-OO1.2O15-OO2 Exhibit and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former MCAS, Tustin; H. That an environmental checklist was prepared for the proposed project that concluded no additional environmental impacts would occur from approval of the project (Exhibit A). The Environmental Analysis Checklist concludes that all of the proposed project's effects were previously examined in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement, that no new effects would occur, that no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur, that no new mitigation measures would be required, that no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and that there are no new mitigation measures or alternatives applicable to the project that would substantially reduce effects of the project that have not been considered and adopted; 1. That the location, size and architectural features of the park will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, the occupancy thereof or the community as a whole in that the following findings can be made: The proposed project is consistent with the current overall development potential, allowed by the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The Urban Design Guidelines as set forth in the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan including massing and siting of development has been incorporated into the design process of the sports park. The Proposed Project would not cause aesthetic impacts that were not previously analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement., The amenities and site layout of the park has been designed with passive area adjacent to residential uses to minimize noise and lighting effects of the sports park. All lights will be equipped w/shields to minimize potential glare to adjacent areas. In addition, the park has a 10:00 curfew in which all lights will be turned off and all activities will cease. These amenities, including landscape and hardscape theme and treatments, will create continuity and design quality of architecture and renovations. The parking analysis included in the Tustin Legacy Master Community Park Master Plan determined that the proposed 450 parking spaces will accommodate the proposed sports uses. Public Works Department has renewed potential traffic related to park use and has determined that there is adequate capacity to support the proposed use thereby creating conformity with the non-residential land use/trip budget. Zoning Administrator Action 11 -009 CP 2015-0011 2015-002 Exhibit A Page 3 Continuity and adequacy of all circulation systems, such as roads, acces points, trails, pedestrian ways and other infrastructure systems needed t serve the project have been reviewed and found to be consistent with th impacts analyzed in the FEIS/EIR, Addendums, and Supplement. I Pursuant to Sections 15162, 151631 15164, and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines no new effects would occur. 11. The Zoning Administrator hereby approves CP 2015-001 and DR 2015-00'0 authorizing the construction and maintenance of Veteran's Sports Park, a 31. acre sports park within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan; specifically, Planning Areal - 1 E and 1 J, and 2 subject to conditions attached hereto as Exhibit B; I PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin at a regular meeting held on the 17 th day of March, 2015. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Administratorheld on the 17 th day of March, 2015. EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONCEPT PLAN 2015-001 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2015-002 VETERANS SPORTS PARK (2) Implementation of the project shall comply with the FEIS/EIR, Addendums and Supplement mitigationmeasures adopted by ., Tustin City Council. (2) 1.2 Prior to building permit issuance, the City shall ensure that adequate fire protection measures are implemented in the project and eliminate any negative impacts on fire protection services. (2) 1.3 Any improvement of the Community park shall include all provisions of the LIFOC and laws, regulations and/or orders which may be promulgated from time to time with respect to the discharge • • removal of hazardous• - (2) 1.4 Prior to issuance of building permits, the City shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project site in compliance with all applicable regulatory standards. (2) 1.5 Prior to issuance of building permits, the City shall work closely with the Tustin Police Department to ensure that adequate security precautions are implemented in the project. (2) 1.6 Park hours shall be consistent with the City of Tustin Park code and shall be closed after 10 PM curfew. (2) 1.7 Lighting standards shall provide shields to reduce impacts or surrounding residentialuses. (2) 1.8 Interior and exterior noise levels shall not exceed those prescribed by state requirements and local City Noise Ordinance and the Tustin General Plan. STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (2) CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM(1) Zoning Administrator Action 2015-002 CP 2015-001, DR 2015-002 Exhibit B Page 2 (2) 1.9 The project shall provide sufficient parking for the sports park use at a minimum of 450 spaces or as determined by an approved parking study. (2) 1.10 The project shall comply with the archeological, air quality, water quality, noise conditions as set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for MCAS Tustin Specific Plan.