Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 MOULTON PKWY PROJ 05-20-96AGE N NO. 7 5-20-96 DATE: MAY 20, 1996 Inter-Com TO: FROM: SUBJECT: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINF. F. RING DIVISION APPROVAL OF THE IMPL~ATION PLAN FOR THE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET PROJF~T RF-~OMMO~DTION It is recommended that the City Council, at their meeting of May 20, 19~6, adopt Resolution No. 96-53 supporting the Moulton Parkway Implementation Plan. FISCAL IMPACT The approval of the plan by the Corridor cities and County will enable each city to apply for Measure "M" Smart Street (100%) monies to fund improvements within their respective jurisdictions. In the case of Tustin projects for which full funding would be sought include: JamboreefF. dinger Grade Separation ($5.5 million); Edinger Widening (SR55 to 1400' east of Redhill) ($4.85 million); and Edinger Widening (Harvard to 2500' west of Jamboree) ($1.1 million). BACKGROUND In 1981, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) identified the improvement of the high flow arterial ("Smart Street") as one of the possible solutions to the County's congested transportation network. The Smart Street concept applies such measures as traffic signal coordination, roadway widening or restriping, intersection improvements (dual left turn lanes, fight turn lanes), on-street parking restrictions, median closures and bus turnouts to provide additional roadway capacity, improve traffic flow and upgrade the safety and effidency of the roadway. Four Sma~ Streets were made eligible for funding under the Measure "M" Smart Street Program (Beach Boulevard, Imperial Ave., Katella Avenue and Moulton Parkway). The limits of the 24.5 mile Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project extend from Main Street in the City of Santa Ana to Del Prado Avenue in the City of Dana Point. The proposed project crosses six cities (Santa Ana, Tustin, Irvine, I4guna HillS, Laguna Niguel and Dana Poin0. The roadway is also referred to as Edinger Avenue, Irvinc Center Drive, and Street of the Golden Lantern depending on the jurisdictional boundaries. The Orange County Environmental .Management Agency (OCEMA) previously completed the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report. The primary goal of the Project Report is to improve traffic capacity to meet post year 2010 traffic demand on the Moulton Parkway corridor. The post-2010 year is used as a target year since it assumes full implementation (buildout) of all cities and County General Plans. The Moulton Parkway Smart Street Environmental Impact Report (EIR-542) was prepared by OCEMA in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and was certified by the Orange County Board of Supervisors on October 3, 1993. · ~ter approval of the Project Report and certification of EIR-542 by the County Board of Supervisors, it became the exclusive responsibility of each local agency along the project route to implement the Smart Street improvements within its respective jurisdiction. Project implementation includes obtaining funding for the project, p~fion of final design plans, acquisition of fight-of-way, construction of the improvements and implementation of the project mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring 'DISCUSSION The Implementation Plan was p~ to define the scope of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project and to outline the proposed implementation of improvements along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street corridor. The objective is .to promote a coordinated planning effort between the cities and the County, which will insure that the project is completed to eliminate, existing and projected deficiencies and to maximize available funding. The Implementation plan has been compiled with information from the previously approved Project Report and EIR. The Implementation Plan establishes and documents the scope, schedules, cost estimates, deficiencies, and funding sources for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street project. The County of Orange, 'as lead agency for this project, has prepared this Implementation Plan to initiate -the funding acquisition process.' This Implementation Plan has been submitted to each city along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor and to OCTA for their review and approval. For this project to 'be eligible for Measure M Smart Street funding, OCTA has indicated that each jurisdiction must approve this Implementation Plan. The majority of the funds for this project are expected to come from Measure M revenues as allocated by OCTA, .as a part of the Smart Street Program. OCWA has not yet determined how the funds will be allocated to each corridor. However, since each Smart Street Corridor has a significant local and regional impact it would appear reasonable to distribute funds equally. A copy of the Implementation Plan for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street project is available for review in the Office of the City Clerk. Tim D. Sexlet Director of Public Works/City Engineer TDS:NM:COUNCIL/Smart Street Nestor M'6ndok Assistant Civil Engineer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13: 14 15 16 17 18 19 25 2~ 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 96-53 A RESOL~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CAI.JFORNIA SUPPORTING THE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN WIqEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), in coordination with local agencies, identified several high flow, multi-jurisdictional arterials ("Smart Streets") as one solution to Orange County's congested transportation network; and WHERE,SsS, Moulton Parkway (FAinger Avenue in the City of Tustin) has been designated a Smart Street from Main Stxeet in the City of Santa Aha to Del Prado Avenue in the City of Dana Point; and WHEREAS, the City of Tustin desires to maintain and improve the streets and roads within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City supports the Smart Street concept as one method of reducing traffic congestion; and WH~AS, a feasibility study was conducted to identify improvements to alleviate existing and future congestion and safety problems on Edinger Avenue/Moulton Parkway; and WHEREAS, analysis of environmental impacts from the Moulton Parkway Smart Street project has been undertaken to address the effects, mitigation measures, and project alternatives associated with the proposed project as required under state and/or federal law; and WHEREAS, local agencies along Moulton Parkway Smart Street have drafted an implementation plan that will be used as a guide for phasing, funding, and constructing Smart Street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Implementation Plan outlines the roles of the local jurisdictions along the Moulton Parkway corridor as well as costs and schedules for improvements; and WH~AS,. the OCTA Board of Directors will only make Smart Street Program funding available to those agencies which approve the Smart Street Implementation Plan and support the components of the plan which affect their jurisdiction; and 1 3 4 5 ? 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, support from all agencies along the Smart Street corridor is critical to the success of the improvements included in the Implementation Plan and will enhance every project in the corridor's opportunity for receiving Smart Street funding from OCTA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: . The City Council of the City of Tustin approves the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Implementation Plan as meeting the goals and objectives of the Moulton Parkway. Smart Street project; and . The City Council agrees to support, seek funding for, and implement the improvements identified in the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Implementation Plan. The City Council suppom the distribution of all available Smart Street funds to each corridor on an equal basis. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 20th day of May, 1996. Tmcy Wills Worley, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared by County of Orange ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY MARCH, 1996 MOULTON PARKWAY MAR 2 0 1996 JSTIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. SMART STREET PROJECT Main Street to Del Prado Avenue IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Prepared by County of Orange Environmental Management Agency Participating Agencies City of Santa Ana City of Tustin City of Irvine County of Orange City of Laguna Hills City of Laguna Niguel City of Dana Point MARCH 1996 • • MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Table of Contents Page 1 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN GOALS 2 2 BACKGROUND 2 3 PROJECT SCOPE & OBJECTIVES 4 3 A.) Alignment Establishment 5 4 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES & PLANS 7 4 A ) Committed Roadway Improvements 11 4 B ) Deficiencies 12 5 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES 15 6 PROJECT PHASING PLAN & PRIORITY RANKINGS 16 7 FINANCIAL STRATEGY & FUNDING SOURCES 20 8 AGREEMENTS PERMITS & APPROVALS 24 9 PROJECT LEAD AGENCIES 25 10 CONCLUSION 25 • APPENDIX 1 Project Segment Summaries 2 Cost Estimate Breakdowns 3 Project Schedules (Bar Charts) 4 Level of Service (LOS) Tables 26 5 Preliminary Plans (Aerial Photos) - Available for Reference in the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report - August 1993 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 1 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN GOALS This plan was prepared to define the scope of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project and to outline the proposed implementation of improvements along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street corridor The objective of this Implementation Plan is to promote a coordinated planning effort between the cities and the County which will insure that the project is completed to enhance existing and projected deficiencies and to maximize available funding The 24 5 mile Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project consists of twenty -five (25) separate segments or intersections to be improved (See Exhibit 1 and listing on page 7 ) This Implementation Plan will outline the development of the project in six (6) links" or segment groupings The goals of the implementation plan are to • Describe the proposed project scope and improvements for each segment * Outline the schedules for each segment and a phasing plan for implementing each link * Establish a cost estimate for each segment • Identify funding sources and a financial strategy for funding each segment * Define the Lead Agency for each segment This implementation plan will outline the roles of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) the County of Orange and the cities along the Moulton Parkway corridor in the development and implementation of the Smart Street Project within their respective jurisdictions Project implementation includes funding acquisition, preparation of design plans (plans, specifications and estimates) acquisition of right -of -way construction of the improvements, and implementation of project mitigation measures 2 BACKGROUND In 1982 the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) formerly the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) performed a "High Flow Arterial Concept Feasibility Study" which indicated that substantial improvements in reducing vehicle delay number of stops, fuel consumption, and vehicle emissions can be achieved through the implementation of the high -flow arterial ( "Smart Street ") concept The Smart Street concept is a method of reducing traffic congestion in Orange County by acting as a complement to the highway system. 2 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan Due to the rapid development in South Orange County and the projected growth in traffic volumes the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project was recommended to relieve existing and future traffic congestion and improve air quality along the 24 5 mile route A preliminary feasibility study was conducted for Moulton Parkway in 1982 which proposed roadway and intersection improvements between Lake Forest Drive and Oso Parkway The methodology recommended by this study to achieve the goal was the upgrading of the roadway from four (4) lanes to six (6) lanes and widening of the intersections In 1989 the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) selected four (4) candidates for the implementation of the Smart Street concept The four candidate roadways included Beach Boulevard, Katella Avenue Imperial Highway and Moulton Parkway The Moulton Parkway Smart Street Feasibility Study was completed on July 30 1991 The report presents an overview of existing and future traffic conditions on Moulton Parkway from Main Street in Santa Ana to Del Prado Avenue in Dana Point Key intersection and mid -block areas with traffic congestion or safety problems were identified Potential physical constraints to solving these problems such as overcrossings (flyovers) and utilities were noted Opportunities for implementation of Smart Street improvements concurrent with future adjacent development were also identified On August 26 1991 the OCTA and the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency (EMA) entered into an agreement outlining their primary roles and responsibilities for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project The County of Orange acting as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) performed all project management functions including but not limited to CEQA document preparation, coordination with affected cities and presentations to the cities OCTA, and the public OCTA provided funding for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Environmental Impact Report (EIR) from Measure M revenues (Regional Streets and Roads Program Smart Street Component) Pursuant to State and local guidelines, the County of Orange prepared and distributed a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study (IS) to prepare a Draft EIR on May 7 1992 The Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report was completed in August 1993 The Project Report updated the July 1991 Feasibility Study The Project Report presents an overview of existing and future traffic conditions on Moulton Parkway from Main Street to Del Prado Avenue (Pacific Coast Highway) The goal of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report was the development of conceptual (preliminary) engineering plans for two (2) alternatives and the creation of a phasing plan for the Smart Street development 3 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan The Project Report was prepared concurrently with the Environmental Impact Report As outlined in the Project Report, traffic flow will be improved through implementation of the following key components • Provision of additional through lanes where six (6) lanes do not exist * Intersection widening to include four (4) through lanes at some major intersections tapering to three (3) through lanes in each direction beyond the intersection, provision of additional turn lanes • parking restrictions • median closures * bus turnouts * traffic signal synchronization The Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) # 542 for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project was completed in March 1993 The Final EIR was certified by the County of Orange Board of Supervisors on October 5 1993 The Final EIR and the Project Report both include refined, "construction- level" alignment plans with accurate right -of -way requirements and construction estimates 3 PROJECT SCOPE & OBJECTIVES The Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project area consists of approximately 24 5 linear miles of existing roadway extending from the City of Santa Ana to the City of Dana Point within the County of Orange California Although Moulton Parkway is a continuous street it is known by several names depending on the various jurisdictional boundaries The roadway is referred to as "Edinger Avenue" in the Cities of Santa Ana and Tustin Irvine Center Drive" in the City of Irvine; 'Moulton Parkway" in the City of Laguna Hills unincorporated areas of Orange County and parts of the City of Laguna Niguel and Street of the Golden Lantern" in Laguna Niguel and Dana Point The project begins with the westernmost boundary located at Main Street in the City of Santa Ana continues south through the Cities of Tustin and Irvine as well as through unincorporated areas of Orange County including Leisure World, and the Cities of Laguna Hills and Laguna Niguel The project terminates at Del Prado Avenue (southbound Pacific Coast Highway) in the City of Dana Point 4 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan Moulton Parkway parallels the heavily congested I -5 freeway to the coast Its proximity to the freeway makes it a natural alternative for many short and medium length trips Additionally its orientation northwest- southeast also roughly parallels the coast allowing Moulton Parkway to be used as a connector between cities inland along the coast These features combined with the extensive growth along the I -5 corridor in the past two decades and more recently the growth and achievement of Cityhood for several areas in the south county make Moulton Parkway a prime candidate for designation as a high flow arterial "Smart Street" The PROJECT OBJECTIVES, as defined in the approved OCTA Moulton Parkway Smart Street Proiect Report (August 1993) and Environmental Impact Report # 542 are outlined below o Implement roadway improvements consistent with the County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) and the General Plan - Circulation Elements of the cities traversed by the project route o Develop alternatives to enhance traffic flow on Moulton Parkway o Construct improvements which implement the objectives of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and the Countywide Growth Management Plan (GMP) o Reduce existing and projected traffic congestion at key intersections along the project route through provision of additional through lanes turn lanes bus turn outs and traffic synchronization o Design improvements which strive to provide an acceptable peak hour level of service (LOS) for Post -2010 conditions The acceptable LOS has been identified as mid -block LOS = C and intersection LOS = D as a target o Develop cost estimates, project phasing and a financing strategy for the recommended improvements 3 A.) ALIGNMENT ESTABLISFMENT Originally the Draft EIR was to analyze two (2) co -equal project alternatives throughout the document the Maximum Operational Section (MOS) Alternative and the Local - Jurisdictional Operational Section (L -JOS) Alternative The MOS Alternative included widening of the roadway to 8 -lane typical cross - sections and upgrading of intersections to include free right -turn and dual left -turn lanes Numerous comments regarding the MOS Alternative were received from City officials and residents during an extensive public scoping process which included five public meetings and five additional City Council presentations The comments received during the public °coping process substantially challenged the feasibility of the MOS Alternative 5 I I LI I I I. I I I I I I I 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan The L -JOS Alternative is a modification of the MOS Alternative whose design is based largely upon the comments received from the residents and the six (6) cities involved in the project at monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings The L -JOS Alternative is consistent with the development plans and goals of each jurisdiction along the project route The L -JOS Alternative is a detailed, "construction -level alignment plan which will provide for 6 -lane typical cross- sections (three thru -lanes in each direction) with added improvements at the intersections Intersection improvements can include four (4) through lanes free right -turn lanes and dual left -turn lanes As a result of the scoping process the County modified the EIR to carry forward the L -JOS Alternative as the preferred project alternative The proposed improvements under the L -JOS Alternative in the EIR are considered the preliminary design plans for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Detailed right -of -way requirements and project cost estimates have been established as part of the L -JOS Alternative Upon certification of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street EIR, it became the exclusive responsibility of the local jurisdictions to implement their desired improvements The proposed improvements outlined in this Implementation Plan are consistent with the L -JOS Alternative The L -JOS Alternative is consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) the County of Orange s long -range circulation plan, and the Circulation Element of the Cities General Plans It is important to understand that the proposed L -JOS Alternative improvements are the maximum feasible improvements that could realistically be implemented for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street (from a political physical and environmental standpoint) The Maximum Operational Section (MOS) alternative resulted in substantially greater adverse environmental impacts than the L -JOS Alternative with negligible traffic capacity or level of service improvements (Preliminary Plans (Aerial Photos) are available for reference in the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Prolect Report, dated August 1993 ) 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 4 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES & PLANS Construction of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street improvements is divided into the following six links" or grouped project segments (See Exhibit 1) LINK 1 Segment A Main Street to Standard Avenue Segment B Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street LINK 2 Segment C Ritchey Street to SR 55 Segment D SR 55 to 1400 feet east of Redhill Avenue Segment El 1400 feet east of Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet west of Jamboree Road Segment E2 Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Ave interchange Segment F 2400 feet west of Jamboree Road to Harvard Avenue Segment G Jamboree Road /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated Interchange) LINK 3 Segment H Harvard Ave to Culver Drive Segment I Irvine Center Drive /Culver Drive (Advanced Traffic Management System) Segment J Irvine Center Drive /Jeffrey Road intersection Segment K Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 Segment L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive LINK 4 Segment M Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico Segment N El Pacifico to Santa Maria Segment 0 Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde Segment P 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia Segment Q Elm Creek to 400 feet south of Laguna Hills Drive Segment R 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas Segment S Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway intersection Segment T Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road intersection Segment U Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway intersection Segment V Median Islands & Bus Turnouts (within Laguna Hills city limits) LINK 5 Segment W Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint Christopher LINK 6 Segment X Camino del Avion to Del Prado The project segments listed above are the proposed project limits as supplied by the County and the cities along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor The cities and the County have additionally provided the Project Development Schedules for each of the segments The Master Implementation Schedule is presented on the following two (2) pages 7 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET MASTER IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE CITY PROJECT LIMITS BEGIN BEGIN BEGIN DESIGN R/W ACQ CONSTR Santa Ana A. Main /Edinger Intersection JUL 2005 JUL 2007 JAN 2010 (w /o Main St to Standard Ave ) B Grand /Edinger Intersection JUL 1996 JUL 1998 JUL 2000 (Standard Ave to Ritchey St ) C Ritchey to SR -55 JUL 1994 JUL 1996 JAN 1998 Tustin D SR 55 to 1400 e/o Redhill JUL 1994 JUL 1996 JAN 1998 Avenue El 1400 e/o Redhill Avenue to JUL 1999 -- JUL 2001 2400 w/o Jamboree E2 Tustin Ranch Rd /Edinger Ave JAN 1997 JAN 2000 F 2400 w/o Jamboree to Harvard Avenue JUL 1993 -- JAN 1996 G Edinger Ave at Jamboree Road JAN 1995 JUN 1996 (Urban Diamond Interchange) Irvine H. ICD - Harvard Ave to Culver Dr complete (Widen to 6 lanes) I ICD at Culver Drive complete (Advanced Traffic Management Sys ) J ICD at Jeffrey Road 98/99 98/99 99/00 (WB free right turn lane) K. Sand Canyon to SR -133 JAN 1997 JAN 1997 JUL 1998 (Developer conditioned) L ICD - I -405 to Lake Forest Dr 96/97 96/97 97/98 (Widen from 4 to 6 lanes) (Developer conditioned) 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET - MASTER IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE (continued) CITY PROJECT LIMITS BEGIN BEGIN BEGIN DESIGN R/W ACQ CONSTR County M. Lake Forest Dr to El Pacifico JAN 1996 JAN 1997 JUL 1998 N El Pacifico to Santa Maria JAN 1995 JAN 1996 JUL 1997 O• Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde JAN 1995 JAN 1996 JUL 1997 P 1200 N/C Cortez to Via Iglesia JAN 1995 N/A JUL 1997 Q Elm Creek to 400 S /Lag Hills JAN 1995 JAN 1996 JUL 1997 R 600 N /Via Lomas to Via Lomas pending Laq. Hills S Moulton /Alicia Intersection JAN 1995 JUL 1996 T Moulton /La Paz Intersection JAN 1995 JUN 1995 JUL 1996 U Moulton /Oso Intersection 1997 1998 1999 ✓ Median Islands /Bus Turnouts 1996 97/98 (Within City Limits) Laq. Niguel W Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint 99/00 00 /01 01/02 Christopher (Widen to 6 lanes) Dana Point X Camino del Avion to Del Prado Post - 2010 9 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan Descriptions of the improvements within each of the project segments are provided, in more detail in the APPENDIX Implementation of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project improvements is already well underway Many segments of the corridor currently exist as six (6) lane cross- sections In addition, one (1) intersection has been completed and two (2) other intersection improvement projects are soon to be under construction * The following segments exist as six (6) lane cross - sections Segment B Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street Segment H Harvard Avenue to Culver Drive Culver Drive to Jeffrey Road SR -133 to I -405 Segment M Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico Segment N El Pacifico to Santa Maria Segment 0 Santa Maria to El Toro Road Segment Q Elm Creek to 400 feet south of Laguna Hills Drive Segment R 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas Glenwood Drive to San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor * SJHTC to Crown Valley Parkway Sardina to Via Ladera Stonehill Drive to Pacific Coast Highway * temporary lane reductions due to Corridor construction (Exhibit 2 shows the Completed (6 Lane) Links and Intersections ) Additional improvements will be completed within the segments listed above (to complete the Smart Street components) including but not limited to Intersection widening bicycle lane provision, bus turnouts parking restrictions median closures For more detailed descriptions see the APPENDIX 10 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * The following INTERSECTIONS are proposed to be widened within the respective Completed (6 Lane) segments Segment B Segment H Segment M Segment N Segment 0 Segment Q Segment S Segment T Segment U Grand Avenue /Edinger Avenue Culver Drive /Irvine Center Drive (completed) Jeffrey Road /Irvine Center Drive Lake Forest Drive /Moulton Parkway Ridge Route /Moulton Parkway El Toro Road /Moulton Parkway Laguna Hills Drive /Moulton Parkway Alicia Parkway /Moulton Parkway (const = July 1996) La Paz Road /Moulton Parkway (const = July 1996) Oso Parkway /Moulton Parkway Aliso Creek Road /Moulton Parkway While there are significant segments of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street which are completed with six (6) lane cross - sections improvements at the intersections listed above need to be completed to fully realize the Smart Street potential of Moulton Parkway 4 A.) COMMITTED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Roadway improvements are an ongoing part of the land development process Currently a number of improvements to Moulton Parkway have been identified that are committed to the design stage These projects are located in the City of Irvine and are primarily associated with the Spectrum development Included in the Project Report and the EIR is a 'No Project alternative identified as the CIMP (Committed Improvements) alternative The following segments include committed improvements that will be completed independent of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Segment K Segment L Sand Canyon to SR -133 I -405 to Lake Forest Drive 11 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 4 B ) DEFICIENCIES Existing Deficiencies Based on 1990 traffic volumes the following six (6) ROADWAY SEGMENTS are operating at a LEVEL OF SERVICE = D or worse and shall be considered as existing deficiencies Segment C Segment D Segment K Segment L Segment P Segment W Ritchey to SR -55 SR -55 to Redhill Avenue Sand Canyon Avenue to Barranca Pkwy Wild Rivers Entrance to Lake Forest Drive El Toro Road to Glenwood Drive Paseo de Colinas to Hidden Hills LOS = D LOS = E LOS = F LOS = F LOS = D LOS = D Also based on 1990 traffic volumes the following five (5) INTERSECTIONS are operating at a LEVEL OF SERVICE = E or worse, and shall be considered as existing deficiencies Segment D Segment D Segment D Segment P NB SR -55 Ramps /Edinger Avenue Del Amo Avenue /Edinger Avenue Redhill Avenue /Edinger Avenue Via Iglesia /Moulton Parkway LOS = E LOS = E LOS = E LOS = E Future Deficiencies * (See Exhibit 3) Without the implementation of the planned Moulton Parkway Smart Street Improvements (L -JOS Alternative) the only improvements that can be assumed to be completed are the CIMP (Committed Improvements) Under the 'No Project (CIMP) scenario the following sixteen (16) ROADWAY SEGMENTS will be operating at a LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) = F in the Year 2010 Segment A Segment B Segment C Segment D Segment E Segment F Main Street to Standard Avenue Standard Avenue to Grand Avenue Ritchey to SR -55 SR -55 to Redhill Avenue Redhill Avenue to Jamboree Road Jamboree Road to Harvard Avenue 12 Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 1 4 E ) DEFICIENCIES (continued) 1 Year 2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT Deficiencies (continued) Segment K Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 Segment L Barranca Parkway to Alton Parkway Alton Parkway to I -405 I -405 to Bake Parkway Bake Parkway to Lake Forest Drive ' Segment M Lake Forest Drive to Ridge Route Segment N Ridge Route Drive to Santa Maria Segment P El Toro Road to Glenwood Drive ' Segment W Crown Valley Parkway to Paseo de Colinas Paseo de Colinas to Marina Hills 1 * Under the "No Project (CIMP) scenario the following 27 INTERSECTIONS will be operating at a LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) = F in the Year 2010 Segment A. Segment B Segment C Segment D Segment E2 Segment G Segment H ' Segment J Segment K. Segment L 1 Segment M Segment N ' Segment O Segment Q Segment S Segment T Segment U 1 Segment W Main Street /Edinger Grand Avenue /Edinger SB SR -55 Ramps /Edinger NB SR -55 Ramps /Edinger Redhill Avenue /Edinger Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Jamboree /Edinger Harvard Avenue /Edinger Yale Avenue /Irvine Center Drive Jeffrey Road /Irvine Center Drive Sand Canyon Rd /Irvine Center Drive NB I -405 Ramps /Irvine Center Drive SB I -405 Ramps /Irvine Center Drive Bake Parkway /Irvine Center Drive Lake Forest Drive /Moulton Parkway Ridge Route Drive /Moulton Parkway Santa Maria /Moulton Parkway El Toro Road /Moulton Parkway Glenwood Drive /Moulton Parkway Laguna Hills Drive /Moulton Parkway Alicia Parkway /Moulton Parkway La Paz Road /Moulton Parkway Oso Parkway /Moulton Parkway Aliso Creek Road /Moulton Parkway Crown Valley Parkway /Moulton Parkway Paseo de Colinas /Moulton Parkway Marina Hills Drive /Moulton Parkway 13 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 4 B ) DEFICIENCIES (continued) ANALYSIS As outlined previously in the PROJECT OBJECTIVES section, the level of service (LOS) objective of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report and EIR is to design improvements which strive to provide an acceptable peak hour level of service for Post -2010 conditions This objective is fulfilled. For all of the project segments the proposed improvements outlined in this Implementation Plan are consistent with those in the approved Project Report and EIR For the purposes of analyzing the "NO PROJECT" (CIMP) Alternative Levels of Service (LOS) versus the L -JOS Alternative Levels of Service (LOS) for buildout Post 2010 Tables 2 -5 2 -6 3 -8 and 3 -9 from the Project Report have been included in the APPENDIX In a comparison of the L -JOS Alternative to the MOS Alternative the L -JOS Alternative was recommended for implementation for the following reasons o Through the public scoping process the City Councils and the public preferred the L -JOS Alternative to the MOS Alternative o The L -JOS Alternative is consistent with development plans of-each jurisdiction The MOS Alternative is not o The L -JOS Alternative will provide for on- street bicycle lanes without the need to acquire additional right -of -way in those roadway sections with six through lanes The MOS Alternative requires acquisition of extensive additional right -of -way for implementation of on -road bicycle lanes o The MOS Alternative resulted in substantially greater adverse environmental impacts than the L -JOS Alternative with negligible traffic capacity or level of service (LOS) improvements o The L -JOS Alternative has been approved by the Cities the County & OCTA 14 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 5 PROJECT COST ESTIMATES A summary of the project segment cost estimates for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street is presented below This table presents the costs for the project segments outlined previously These cost estimates were either derived from the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Proiect Report or were supplied by the local jurisdictions Cost Estimate Breakdowns are included in the Appendix. SEGMENT AMOUNT Segment A. Main Street to Standard Avenue Segment B Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street $ 5 300 000 $ 9 700 000 Segment C Ritchey Street to SR 55 $ 1 900 000 Segment D SR 55 to 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue $ 4 850 000 Segment El 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet $ 2 600 000 west of Jamboree Road Segment E2 Tustin Ranch Rd /Edinger Ave interchange $ 15 000 000 Segment F 2400 feet w/o Jamboree Rd to Harvard Ave $ 1 100 000 Segment G Jamboree Rd /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated $ 16 500 000 * Interchange) Segment H Harvard Ave to Culver Drive complete Segment I Irvine Center Dr /Culver Dr (Adv Traffic complete Management System) Segment J Irvine Center Dr /Jeffrey Rd intersection $ 750 000 Segment K Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 $ 1 400 000 Segment L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive $ 9 100 000 Segment M Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico $ 525 000 Segment N El Pacifico to Santa Maria $ 1 200 000 Segment 0 Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde $ 2 300,000 Segment P 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia $ 850,000 Segment Q Elm Creek to 400 feet 8/o Laguna Hills Drive $ 200 000 Segment R 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas $ 30 000 Segment S Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway intersection $ 1 600 000 Segment T Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road intersection $ 1 300 000 Segment U Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway intersection $ 1 600 000 Segment V Median Islands & Bus Turnouts (Laguna Hills $ 1 000 000 city limits) Segment W Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint Christopher $ 2,086 500 Segment X Camino del Avion to Del Prado $ 0 Total $ 80 891 500 15 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan Included in the cost estimates are costs for engineering right -of -way acquisition services environmental mitigation, and contingencies Of the $ 80 891,500 total cost estimate approximately $ 25 268 185 is for right -of -way acquisition costs • The cost estimate for Segment G• Jamboree Rd. /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated Interchange) is $ 16 500 000 An agreement exists between the City of Tustin, the City of Irvine and the Transportation Corridors Agency (TCA) that the project funding is to be equally divided between the three parties The share of the cost to the Smart Street Program is $ 11 000 000 The TCA is funding $ 5 500 000 for this project The two cities are seeking Measure M Smart Street funds to fund their share of the project cost While an agreement exists between Irvine /TCA /Tustin the improvements at this interchange are paramount to the success of the Smart Street project 6 PROJECT PHASING PLAN & PRIORITY RANKINGS The Cities of Santa Ana Tustin, Irvine Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel Dana Point and the County of Orange will be responsible for implementation of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street project within their respective jurisdictions Design, right -of -way and construction activities must be consistent with the recommended improvements identified in the project report and environmental studies Coordination among agencies is essential to maintain the intent and goals established for the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project phasing and scheduling is at the discretion of the implementing agencies Outlined herein is a PROPOSED PHASING PLAN which has been based on (in no particular order) 1 The implementation schedules provided by the cities 2 The existing completed improvements 3 The committed roadway improvements (developer conditioned) 4 The existing and future deficiencies • THE PROJECT PHASING PLAN PHASE I LINK 2 SEGMENT F SEGMENT G SEGMENT C SEGMENT D (Years 1995 -2000) 2400 w/o Jamboree Rd to Harvard Ave Jamboree Road /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated Interchange) Ritchey Street to SR -55 SR -55 to 1400 e/o Redhill Avenue 16 Begin Const Jan 1996 Jun 1996 Jan 1998 Jan 1998 • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 6 PROJECT PHASING PLAN (continued) PHASE I LINK 4 SEGMENT S SEGMENT T SEGMENT N SEGMENT 0 SEGMENT P SEGMENT Q SEGMENT V SEGMENT M SEGMENT U LINK 3 SEGMENT L SEGMENT K SEGMENT J PHASE II SEGMENT E2 SEGMENT B SEGMENT El SEGMENT W PHASE III (Years 1995 -2000) Moulton /Alicia Intersection Moulton /La Paz Intersection El Pacifico to Santa Maria Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde 1200 n/o Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia Elm Creek to 400 s/o Laguna Hills Dr Median Islands /Bus Turnouts Lake Forest Dr to El Pacifico Moulton /Oso Intersection • I -405 to Lake Forest Drive (Developer Conditioned) Sand Canyon Road to SR -133 (Developer Conditioned) Irvine Center Dr /Jeffrey Rd Intersection (Years 2000 -2005) Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Ave interchange Grand Avenue /Edinger Intersection 1400 e/o Redhill Ave to 2400 w/o Jamboree Road Aloma Avenue to Sardina /St Christopher (Years 2005 -2010) SEGMENT A Main Street /Edinger Intersection PHASE IV (Post 2010) SEGMENT X Camino del Avion to Del Prado Begin Const Jul 1996 Jul 1996 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 1997/1998 Jul 1998 1999 1997/1998 Jul 1998 1999/2000 Jan 2000 Jul 2000 Jul 2001 2001/2002 Jan 2010 Post -2010 17 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * PROJECT PRIORITY RANKINGS SEGMENT 1 Segment F 2 Segment G 3 Segment C Segment D 4 Segment W 5 Segment B 6 Segment A. 7 Segment J 8 Segment E2 9 Segment El Segment S Segment T Segment U Segment N Segment 0 Segment P Segment Q Segment V Segment M Segment R 2400 feet w/o Jamboree Rd to Harvard Ave Jamboree Rd /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated Interchange) Ritchey Street to SR 55 SR 55 to 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint Christopher Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street Main Street to Standard Avenue Irvine Center Dr /Jeffrey Rd intersection Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Ave interchange 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet west of Jamboree Road AMOUNT $ 1 100 000 $ 11 000 000 $ 1 900 000 $ 4 850 000 $ 2 086 500 $ 9 700 000 $ 5 300 000 $ 750 000 $ 15 000 000 * $ 2 600 000 * Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway intersection $ 1 600 000 ** Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road intersection $ 1 300 000 ** Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway intersection $ 1 200 000 ** El Pacifico to Santa Maria $ 1 200 000 ** Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde $ 2 300 000 ** 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia $ 1 200 000 ** Elm Creek to 400 feet s/o Laguna Hills Drive $ 200 000 ** Median Islands & Bus Turnouts (Laguna Hills $ 1 000 000 ** city limits) Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas Segment L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive Segment K Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 Segment X Camino del Avion to Del Prado $ 525 000 ** $ 30 000 ** $ 9 100 000 * ** $ 1 400 000 * ** * Potential for partial outside funding (Tustin MCAS redevelopment) ** Moulton Parkway /Laguna Niguel /CARITS Fee Programs * ** Developer conditioned 18 0 Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan PHASING ANALYSIS. LINK 2 (Segments C D El E2 F G) is considered the highest priority because of the following ' 1 Fulfills the objectives in the Project Report and EIR by improving the highest number of existing and future roadway segment and intersection deficiencies within the LINK 2 Two (2) projects within this LINK are planned for implementation within the next year In particular the design work for the Jamboree Road /Edinger Avenue Grade Separated Interchange is currently proceeding on schedule This is the largest single project in the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Program ' 3 This LINK will provide for an important Freeway to Tollway connection In addition to the above the following factor has been considered The schedule for opening of the West Leg of the Eastern Transportation 11 Corridor which will join Jamboree Road near Edinger Avenue, is December 1999 The Corridor will deliver higher volumes on to Moulton Parkway (Edinger Avenue) when it is opened 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 7 FINANCIAL STRATEGY AND FUNDING SOURCES ' The potential funding sources for improvements along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project are available from three general categories local state and federal 1 1 1 1 1 1 Local funding sources that the Moulton Parkway Smart Street may be eligible for include MEASURE M FUNDS The majority of the funds for this project are expected to come from Measure M revenues as allocated by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) as a part of the Smart Street Program Funding is allocated among the Smart Street projects on a competitive project merit basis by OCTA. It should be noted that OCTA has the option of funding a portion of each of the three currently proposed Smart Streets (Moulton Parkway Imperial Highway and Katella Avenue) If the designated Smart Street funds are not sufficient to cover all the costs of the Moulton Parkway improvements this project may be eligible for funds from other Measure M programs including, but not limited to the Regional Interchange Program, the Intersection Improvement Program, the Traffic Signal Coordination Program Furthermore Measure "M' will also provide $ 400 million in subventions (over the 20 year term of Measure "M ") to the local jurisdictions which they can use at their discretion Another potential funding source is the local jurisdictions funds Each jurisdiction will need to consider the Moulton Parkway improvements along with other funding priorities within its boundaries and decide the amount of funding warranted In areas where the Smart Street passes through a redevelopment district the affected Redevelopment Agency may wish to apply some of its funds towards specific improvements that it feels are of high priority New development projects should be conditioned to provide for their fair share of Smart Street improvement funding as warranted by their level of development The feasibility of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project will be greatly enhanced by incorporating private financing mechanisms such as special assessment districts impact fees and negotiated developer contributions into ' the overall financing plan For Project Segments K and L, the City of Irvine has conditioned the developer to construct these improvements as traffic impact mitigation The costs associated with these improvements ($ 10 5 million) will be borne by the developer The "Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for Moulton Parkway and Laguna ' Niguel Area" is an example of a fee program used in the past to help fund transportation improvements along Moulton Parkway The Moulton Parkway /Laguna Niguel Fee Program has a current balance of $ 6 55 million Another fee program, the CARITS (Coastal Area Road Improvements & Traffic Signals) Fee Program has approximately $ 8 2 million allocated for the Moulton Parkway /E1 Toro Road intersection Together these fee programs could provide the funding for the LINK 4 improvements (Segments M -V) The cost estimate for the LINK 4 improvements is $ 10 575 million 1 20 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan The majority of state -level transportation funds are generated from state and federal gas taxes Proposition 111 (Traffic Congestion Relief and Spending Limitation Act of 1990) provides revenues to be used to reduce traffic congestion by building state highways local streets and roads and public mass transit facilities The cities through which the Moulton Parkway Smart ' Street will pass as well as the unincorporated County are expected to receive Proposition 111 turnback funds over the next twenty years Other state funding programs include the State /Local Partnership Program which provides financial assistance for locally funded transportation projects through reimbursements The State Transit Assistance Funds (STAF) program is administered by OCTA to provide funding for transit projects The Moulton Parkway Smart Street may be eligible for some of these funds for the construction of bus turnouts The Surface Transportation Program (STP) is a federally funded program which was established in 1991 by the passage of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) The STP allocates federal funds to the State and cities through OCTA Moulton Parkway is eligible for STP funds ' because it is listed on the County's Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Plans - A listing of the proposed and potential funding sources for the improvements along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street corridor is included in the following pages Also included is a funding matrix 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 1 1 Segment F 2400 feet w/o Jamboree Rd to Harvard Ave $ 1 100 000 2 Segment G Jamboree Rd /Edinger Ave (Grade Separated $ 11 000 000 Interchange) 3 Segment C Ritchey Street to SR 55 $ 1 900 000 Segment D SR 55 to 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue $ 4 850 000 4 Segment W Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint Christopher $ 2 086 500 5 Segment B Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street $ 9 700 000 6 Segment A. Main Street to Standard Avenue $ 5 300 000 7 Segment J Irvine Center Dr /Jeffrey Rd intersection $ 750 000 TOTAL OCTA SMART STREET PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIRED = $ 36,686,500 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan FINANCIAL STRATEGY SEGMENT AMOUNT 1 TOTAL OF OCTA SMART STREET PROGRAM FUNDING REQUIRED & POTENTIAL FOR PARTIAL OUTSIDE FUNDING = $ 54 286 500 Segment S Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway intersection $ 1 600 000 ** Segment T Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road intersection $ 1 300 000 ** Segment U Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway intersection $ 1 600 000 ** Segment N El Pacifico to Santa Maria $ 1 200 000 ** Segment 0 Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde $ 2 300 000 ** Segment P 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia $ 850 000 ** Segment Q Elm Creek to 400 feet s/o Laguna Hills Drive $ 200 000 ** Segment V Median Islands & Bus Turnouts (Laguna Hills $ 1 000 000 ** city limits) Segment M Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico $ 525 000 ** Segment R 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas $ 30 000 ** Segment L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive $ 9 100 000 * ** Segment K. Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 $ 1 400 000 * ** Segment X Camino del Avion to Del Prado $ 0 Segment G Jamboree /Edinger Ave Interchange $ 5 500 000 # Segment E2 Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Ave interchange $ 15 000 000 * Segment El 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet $ 2 600 000 * west of Jamboree Road 1 1 1 1 TOTAL OF COMMITTED OUTSIDE FUNDING = $ 26,605,000 1 TOTAL PROJECT COST = $ 80 891,500 ' * Potential for partial outside funding (Tustin MCAS redevelopment) ** Moulton Parkway /Laguna Niguel /CARITS Fee Programs * ** Developer conditioned (Irvine Spectrum) ' # Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) 22 1 • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan FINANCIAL STRATEGY (PER PHASE) PHASE I. (Years 1995 -2000) LINK 2 Segment F 2400 w/o Jamboree to Harvard Segment G Jamboree /Edinger Interchange Segment C Ritchey Street to SR -55 Segment D SR -55 to 1400 e/o Redhill LINK 4. Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment Segment LINK 3. S Moulton /Alicia intersection T Moulton /La Paz intersection N El Pacifico to Santa Maria O Santa Maria to Via Campo Verde P 1200 n/o C Cortez to Via Iglesia Q Elm Creek to 400 s/o Lag Hills ✓ Median Islands /Bus Turnouts M Lake Forest to El Pacifico U Moulton /Oso intersection • Begin Const Jan 1996 Jun 1996 Jan 1998 Jan 1998 Jul 1996 Jul 1996 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 1997/1998 Jul 1999 1999 Segment L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive 1997/1998 Segment K Sand Canyon Road to SR -133 Jul 1998 Segment J Irvine Center /Jeffrey intersection 1999/2000 TOTAL PHASE I = PHASE II. (Years 2000 -2005) Segment E2 Segment B Segment El Segment W Tustin Ranch /Edinger interchange Grand /Edinger intersection 1400 e/o Rdh - 2400 w/o Jamb Aloma to Sardina /St Christopher TOTAL PHASE II = PHASE III (Years 2005 -2010) Segment A Main /Edinger intersection 23 Jan 2000 Jul 2000 Jul 2001 2001/2002 Cost $ 1 100 000 $ 16 500 000 $ 1 900 000 $ 4,850,000 $ 24 350 000 $ 1 600 000 $ 1 300 000 $ 1 200 000 $ 2 300 000 $ 850 000 $ 200 000 $ 1 000 000 $ 525 000 $ 1,600,000 $ 10 575 000 $ 9 100 000 $ 1 400 000 $ 750,000 $ 11 250 000 $ 46,175 000 $ 15 000 000 $ 9 700 000 $ 2 600 000 $ 2,086,500 $ 29 386 500 Jan 2010 $ 5,300,000 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET PROJECT FUNDING MATRIX ®=glall COUNTY FEE PROGRAMS DEVELOPER OTHERS TOTAL $5,300,000 Ste® MIIIMIE $5 B $9,700,000 - - - -- $9,700,000 $1.900.000 - -••111111111111MOIN -- $1,900,000 D $4,850,000 - - - -- $4,850,000 El IIIIIISIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIMIIINIIIIIIIIIII - $2 600,000 $2 600,000 E2 - - - -- $15,000,000 $15,000,000 $1 100,000 $1,100,000 G $11,000,000 - -_ - -- $11,000,000 _ $5- $ J Inilli L $ - - - =MI - -- -- $525 000 $1,400,000 $9,100,000 - - MIIIIIIIIIN $750,000 $1,400,000 $9,100,000 $525 000 M N - -- $1,200,000 -- $1,200,000 O MM. $2,300,000 $2,300,000 P - -- $850,000 -- $850,000 o ONMEMEMMEMMOMMEN $200,000 111111.11.111.1111 $200,000 R - -- $30,000 -- $30,000 S MOIMMIIIMEMENUMIIIMIM $1,600,000 -- $1,600,000 T - ® -- $1,300,000 $1,600,000 -- $1,300,000 $1 600,000 U V - -- $1,000,000 -- $1,000,000 W $2,086,500 2,086,500 TOTAL $36,686,500 $10,605,000 $10,500,000 $23,100,000 $80,891,500 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 8 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS & APPROVALS The approved Environmental Impact Report (EIR) # 542 the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project Report and this Implementation Plan will be used by the County of Orange as Lead Agency and OCTA to make future discretionary decisions including allocation of funds and issuance of permits As Responsible Agencies the Cities of Santa Ana Tustin, Irvine Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel and Dana Point the Orange County Flood Control District and Caltrans will use the EIR to provide environmental clearance for their discretionary decisions (authorization of design right -of -way acquisition and construction) on the project The following is a list of permits anticipated to be required for the project and the associated approving authority REQUIRED ACTION APPROVING AUTHORITY Grading Permits 1601 Agreement * Section 404 Permit * Funding Distribution NPDES Permit Encroachment Permit Coastal Development Permit OCEMA, Implementing Agencies California Department of Fish & Game U S Army Corps of Engineers Orange County Transportation Authority State Water Resources Control Board Orange County Flood Control District Caltrans Coastal Commission (City of Dana Point) * If required due to improvements to drainage channels In addition to the above, the project will require modifications to existing public services and utilities The Implementing Agencies would negotiate agreements with the utility companies as required Also, each local jurisdiction will be responsible for ongoing maintenance operations following construction of their respective portion of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street improvements 24 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan 9 PROJECT LEAD AGENCIES As stated previously in this report upon certification of the Moulton Parkway Smart Street EIR, it became the exclusive responsibility of each local jurisdiction to implement their desired improvements along the corridor Implementation includes funding acquisition preparation of design plans (plans specifications and estimates) acquisition of right -of -way and construction of the improvements The County of Orange as the Lead Agency for the project has prepared this Implementation Plan to initiate the funding acquisition process This Implementation Plan will be submitted to each City along the Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor and to OCTA, for their review and approval For this project to be eligible for Measure "M" Smart Street funding OCTA has indicated that each jurisdiction must approve this Implementation Plan The project schedules included in this report have been submitted by the Cities and indicate the timelines for design, right -of -way acquisition, and construction 10 CONCLUSION The Moulton Parkway Smart Street Project is already underway A number of segments along the corridor are currently 6 -lane cross - sections Two (2) projects (Segments H and I) are already completed Two (2) intersection projects (Segments S and T) are soon to be under construction A number of project segments are in the design phase and scheduled for construction within the next two years The approved Moulton Parkway Smart Street EIR and the Project Report define the alignment at a construction -level of detail and accurate construction costs and right -of -way requirements have been established and are included in this Implementation Plan All of the coordination with the affected agencies to establish the project alignment and scope was completed during the EIR approval process The number of existing and future deficient links and intersections along Moulton Parkway point to the clear need for the project improvements The construction of the Eastern Transportation Corridor and the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor will only contribute to the necessity of providing an upgraded Moulton Parkway Smart Street This implementation plan has been compiled with information from the previously approved Environmental Impact Report and Project Report This implementation plan establishes and documents the scope schedules cost estimates, deficiencies and funding sources for the Moulton Parkway Smart ' Street project 25 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * APPENDIX 1 PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES SEGMENT A. Main Street to Standard Avenue (City of Santa Ana) Proiect Description 1 1 1 SEGMENT B Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street (City of Santa Ana) Proiect Description The proposed improvements in this segment include restriping Edinger Avenue to a six -lane divided roadway Intersection improvements at Main Street include widening for dual left -turn lanes on Edinger Avenue and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of the intersection Also included is the construction of a raised median on Edinger Avenue between Main Street and Orange Avenue and the construction of bus turnouts near the Main Street Maple Street and Standard Avenue intersections The restriping work can be accomplished within the existing curbs Right -of -way will need to be acquired to widen the Main Street intersection, and to construct the bus turnouts The proposed improvements in this segment include the widening of the Grand ' Avenue intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of the intersection Also included is the construction of bus turnouts near the Grand Avenue Lyon Street and ' Ritchey Street intersections Right -of -way will need to be acquired to widen the Grand Avenue intersection, and to construct the bus turnouts ' SEGMENT C. Ritchey Street to SR -55 (City of Santa Ana) Proiect Description ' The proposed improvements in this segment include restriping Edinger Avenue to provide for a six -lane divided roadway and constructing a raised median for the entire length of the segment (excluding intersections at Boyd Street and ' the on /off ramps for the SR -55) Also included is construction of exclusive right -turn lanes for the SR -55 on /off ramps Right -of -way will need to be acquired to construct the right -turn lanes The restriping work can be accomplished within the existing curbs 1 1 26 1 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * APPENDIX PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES (continued) ' SEGMENT D SR -55 to 1400 feet east of Redhill Avenue (City of Tustin) Project Description The proposed improvements include widening of Edinger Avenue to provide for a six -lane roadway with Class II on -road striped bike lanes Also included is the construction of a raised median through the length of the segment (with openings at the Del Amo Avenue Pacific Bell Driveway and Redhill Avenue intersections) The widening of the Redhill Avenue intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs is part of the planned improvements SEGMENT El 1400 feet east of Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet west of Jamboree Road (City of Tustin) Proiect Description The proposed improvements include widening of Edinger Avenue to provide for a six -lane roadway with Class II on -road striped bike lanes Also included is the construction of a raised median through the length of the segment (with an opening at the future Tustin Ranch Road intersection) SEGMENT E2 Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Avenue Interchange (City of Tustin) Project Description 11 interchange proposed improvements include the construction of a grade separated interchange The design includes a bridge structure which will carry traffic on Tustin Ranch Road over Edinger Avenue, thus eliminating the through traffic on Tustin Ranch Road from the intersection Work will also include Edinger Avenue improvements in the vicinity of the proposed overcrossing and Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Avenue on -off ramps SEGMENT F 2400 feet west of Jamboree Road to Harvard Avenue (City of Tustin) Proiect Description The proposed improvements include widening of Edinger Avenue to provide for a six -lane roadway with Class II on -road striped bike lanes Also included are ' improvements to the Harvard intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs ' 27 • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan ' • APPENDIX PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES ' SEGMENT G• Jamboree Road /Edinger Avenue (Grade Separated Interchange) (City of Tustin) Proiect Description The proposed improvements include the construction of an Urban Diamond (flyover) interchange The design includes a bridge structure which will carry traffic on Jamboree Road over Edinger Avenue thus eliminating the through traffic on Jamboree Road from the intersection The horizontal alignment ' matches the existing alignments of Jamboree Road and Edinger Avenue The interchange must be operational prior to the opening of the Eastern Transportation Corridor (scheduled for December 1999) SEGMENT R Harvard Avenue to Culver Drive (City of Irvine) Proiect Description 1 This project was completed in 1995 The improvements include the widening of Irvine Center Drive to provide for a six -lane roadway with Class II on -road striped bike lanes SEGMENT I Irvine Center Drive /Culver Drive (City of Irvine) ' Proiect Description This project was completed in 1995 The project included the provision of ' Advanced Traffic Management System improvements at the intersection (Additional information to be supplied by the City of Irvine ) SEGMENT J Irvine Center Drive /Jeffrey Road (City of Irvine) Proiect Description The proposed improvements include the construction of dual -left turn lanes for both legs of Irvine Center Drive and the construction of a free right -turn lane for westbound Irvine Center Drive Also included is a farside bus turnout on the eastbound leg of the intersection 1 1 28 1 ' • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * APPENDIX PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES ' SEGMENT R. Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 (County of Orange) Proiect Description ' The proposed improvements include the widening of Irvine Center Drive to provide for a six -lane roadway, with a raised median and Class II on -road, striped bike lanes Dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes are proposed for all four (4) legs at the Sand Canyon Avenue intersection These improvements are developer conditioned improvements SEGMENT L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive (City of Irvine) Project Description 1 1 1 SEGMENT M. Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico (County of Orange) Project Description The proposed improvements include the widening of Irvine Center Drive to provide for a six -lane roadway with a raised median and Class II on -road, striped bike lanes Also proposed are intersection improvements at the Wild Rivers Entrance and at Bake Parkway At the Bake Parkway intersection, it is planned to provide for dual left -turn lanes on all four (4) legs Six bus turnouts are proposed to be constructed within this segment and construction of retaining walls will also be required to accommodate the proposed improvements The proposed work includes improvements for the southerly leg of the Lake Forest intersection to provide for a fourth southbound through lane an exclusive northbound right -turn lane and dual left -turn lanes Also included is the construction of a raised median for the length of the segment, Class II 1 on -road striped bike lanes and a bus turnout near the Lake Forest Drive intersection Right -of -way acquisition and retaining wall construction will be required to complete the proposed improvements 1 SEGMENT N El Pacifico to Santa Maria Avenue (County of Orange) Project Description The proposed work includes improvements at the intersection of Ridge Route Drive to include dual left -turn lanes on Moulton Parkway Also included is the 1 construction of raised medians a bus turnout Class II on -road striped bike lanes and an exclusive southbound right -turn lane at the Santa Maria intersection Right -of -way acquisition and retaining wall construction will be 1 necessary to complete the proposed improvements 29 1 ' • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan • APPENDIX PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES ' SEGMENT 0 Santa Maria Avenue to Via Campo Verde (County of Orange) Project Description 1 The proposed work includes improvements at the El Toro Road intersection to provide for four (4) through lanes in the nortbound and southbound directions dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of the intersection Also included is the provision of dual northbound left -turn lanes at the Santa Maria intersection raised medians and Class II on -road striped bike lanes Right -of -way acquisition and retaining wall construction will be necessary to complete the proposed improvements SEGMENT P 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia (County of Orange) 1 Proiect Description 1 The proposed work includes the construction of a 6 foot sidewalk and the construction of sound walls on the east side of the roadway Acquisition or dedication of right -of -way will be necessary to complete the proposed improvements 1 SEGMENT Q Elm Creek Lane to 400 feet south of Laguna Hills Drive (County of Orange) Proiect Description 1 The proposed work includes improvements at the intersection of Laguna Hills Drive to provide for four (4) northbound through lanes and an exclusive northbound right -turn lane Also included is construction of a bus turnout near the Laguna Hills intersection and a retaining wall to accommodate the bus 1 turnout SEGMENT R 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas (County of Orange) Proiect Description The proposed work includes construction of a raised median and a bus turnout at the Via Lomas intersection This project is not currently scheduled for construction 1 1 30 1 ' • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan * APPENDIX PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES SEGMENT S Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway Intersection (City of Laguna Hills) Project Description The proposed work includes improvements at the intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of the intersection Widening of the intersection and construction of retaining walls will be required to provide for the improvements SEGMENT T Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road Intersection (City of Laguna Hills) Project Description ' The proposed work includes improvements at the intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes and exclusive right -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of II the intersection Widening of the intersection and construction of retaining walls will be required to provide for the improvements SEGMENT 0 Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway Intersection (City of Laguna Hills) 1 Project Description II The proposed work includes improvements at the intersection to provide for dual left -turn lanes on all four (4) legs of the intersection and exclusive right -turn lanes on three (3) of the legs Widening of the intersection and construction of retaining walls will be required to provide for the ' improvements SEGMENT V Median Islands /Bus Turnouts (City of Laguna Hills) IProject Description I The proposed work includes the construction of raised medians on Moulton Parkway through the city limits and the construction of bus turnouts south of Via Lomas and near the Mandeville Drive intersections Right -of -way acquisition will not be necessary for these improvements 1 1 31 1 ' • • Moulton Parkway Smart Street Corridor Implementation Plan ' • APPENDIX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROJECT SEGMENT SUMMARIES SEGMENT W Aloma Avenue to Sardina /St Christopher (City of Laguna Niguel) Proiect Description The proposed improvements include the provision of a six -lane raodway through this segment by widening Moulton Parkway restriping the roadway narrowing existing raised medians constructing new raised medians and constructing retaining walls Right -of -way acquisition will be required to complete the proposed widening work Extensive noise mitigation work is required to meet the conditions imposed by the Project EIR This work includes window treatments air conditioning and some soundwall installations SEGMENT X Camino del Avion to Del Prado (City of Dana Point) Proiect Description The proposed work in the Project Report includes the provision of six -lane roadway improvements between Camino del Avion and Stonehill Drive This work would be accomplished through restriping narrowing of existing raised medians and some widening of Street of the Golden Lantern Also included is the construction of a raised median island between Stonehill Drive and Priscilla Drive Currently the City of Dana Point has not included this work in their CIP Based on the current and future projected traffic volumes these improvements will not be needed until after the year 2010 32 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT A Main Street to Standard Avenue (City of Santa Ana) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 18 540 Construct Concrete $ 105 225 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 48 090 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 175 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 10 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 19 200 Utility Pole Relocation $ 5 000 Relocate Inlets $ 70 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 451 055 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 67 660 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 67 660 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 586 375 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 4 713 625 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 5 300 000 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT Standard Avenue to Ritchey Street (City of Santa Ana) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION IRemove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 36 340 Construct Concrete $ 171 825 I Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 83 250 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 100 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 11 000 11 Block Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 0 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 65 000 IIROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 467 415 II ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 70 110 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 70 110 IROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 607 635 IIRIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 9 092 365 IIPROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 9 700 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 1 Ritchey Street to SR -55 (City of Santa Ana) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION IEarthwork $ 56 280 Roadway Structural Section $ 271 680 ,Drainage $ 7 375 , Specialty Items $ 28 190 Traffic Items $ 78 400 $ ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 441 925 ENGINEERING (20 %) $ 88 400 I CONTINGENCY (10 %) $ 44 200 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (20%) $ 88 400 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 662 925 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 1 237 075 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 900 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 11 SEGMENT D 1 SR -55 to 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue (City of Tustin) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 Earthwork $ 186 540 Roadway Structural Section $ 895 480 1 Drainage $ 89 470 Specialty Items $ 181 834 Traffic Items $ 358 900 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 1 712 200 ENGINEERING (20 %) $ 342 400 IICONTINGENCY (10 %) $ 171 200 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (20 %) $ 342 400 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 2 568 200 INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS ® SR -55 $ 952 500 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 1 329 300 1 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 4 850 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT E1 1400 feet e/o Redhill Avenue to 2400 feet w/o Jamboree Road (City of Tustin) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION IIMobilization $ 15 000 Traffic Control $ 37 426 I Earthwork $ 239 744 Roadway Structural Section $ 953 528 Landscaping $ 169 620 Drainage $ 263 960 Traffic Items $ 186 000 Utilities $ 6 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 1 871 278 ENGINEERING (15%) $ 280 692 CONTINGENCY (091) $ 167 338 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (151) $ 280 692 IROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 2 600 000 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 0 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 2 600 000 II 1 I 1 1 1 1 • • 1 11 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET iSEGMENT E2 Tustin Ranch Road /Edinger Avenue Interchange (City of Tustin) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 Mobilization $ 440 000 Earthwork $ 883 000 II Drainage $ 386 000 Roadway Structural Section $ 2 161 000 Traffic Items $ 419 000 1 Landscaping $ 405 000 Tustin Ranch Road Bridge $ 6 106 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 10 800 000 ENGINEERING $ 1 500 000 CONTINGENCY $ 1 200 000 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $ 1 500 000 IIROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 15 000 000 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 0 IPROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 15 000 000 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 2400 feet w/o Jamboree Road to Harvard Avenue (City of Tustin) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 Mobilization $ 15 000 Traffic Control $ 15 300 II Earthwork $ 60 290 Roadway Structural Section $ 497 700 Landscaping $ 41 801 Drainage $ 54 499 1 Traffic Items $ 149 110 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 833 700 11 ENGINEERING $ 57 500 CONTINGENCY (10 %) $ 83 700 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (15%) $ 125 100 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 100 000 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 0 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 100 000 II 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT Jamboree Road /Edinger Avenue Grade S(City of Tustin) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION ' Mobilization $ 288 650 Earthwork $ 1 665 732 II Roadway Structural Section $ 777 230 Specialty Items $ 2 395 038 Drainage $ 390 000 Traffic Items $ 545 000 IIMinor Items $ 865 950 Bridge Structure $ 5 321 840 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 12 249 440 CONTINGENCY (10 -15 %) $ 1 550 560 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $ 700 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 14 500 000 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 2 000 000 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 16 500 000 1 1 1 1 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 11 Irvine Center Drive /Jeffrey Road Intersection (City of Irvine) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 30 000 Construct Concrete $ 70 000 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 60 000 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 150 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 30 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 0 Utility Pole Relocation $ 5 000 Relocate Inlets $ 55 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 400 000 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 60 000 CONTINGENCY (15%) $ 60 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 520 000 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 230 000 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 750 000 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 11 Sand Canyon Avenue to SR -133 (City of Irvine) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 0 Construct Concrete $ 31 500 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 373 000 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 200,000 Light Pole Relocation $ 30 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 270 000 Block or Retaining Walls $ 10 000 Utility Pole Relocation $ 5 500 Relocate Inlets $ 30 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 950 000 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 142 500 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 142 500 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 235 000 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 165 000 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 400 000 ft • • 1 11 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT L I -405 to Lake Forest Drive (City of Irvine) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 45 280 Construct Concrete $ 125 550 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 917 190 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 225 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 64 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 2 564 100 Block or Retaining Walls $ 37 250 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 30 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 4 008 370 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 601 255 CONTINGENCY (15$) $ 601 255 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 5 210 880 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 3 889 120 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 9 100 000 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT M Lake Forest Drive to El Pacifico Drive (County of Orange) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION IRemove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 9 560 Construct Concrete $ 50 850 11 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 20 160 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 100 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 1 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 II Block or Retaining Walls $ 37 650 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 20 000 ' ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 239 220 /I ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 35 880 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 35 880 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 310 980 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 214 020 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 525 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT N El Pacifico Drive to Santa Maria Avenue (County of Orange) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 25 160 Construct Concrete $ 114 600 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 88 350 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 100 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 1 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 129 930 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 60 000 Miscellaneous Items $ 12 650 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 531 690 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 79 750 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 79 750 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 691 190 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 508 810 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 200 000 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT O 11 Santa Maria Avenue to Via Campo Verde (County of Orange) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 67 560 Construct Concrete $ 267 150 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 191 040 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 250 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 4 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 161 300 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 100 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 1 041 050 ENGINEERING (15 %) $ 156 200 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 156 200 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 353 450 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 946 550 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 2 300 000 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 1200 feet north of Calle Cortez to Via Iglesia (County of Orange) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION / Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 0 Construct Concrete $ 115 000 II Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 0 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 0 Light Pole Relocation $ 0 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 II Block or Retaining Walls $ 385 000 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 0 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 500 000 1 ENGINEERING (15%) $ 75 000 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 75 000 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 650 000 1 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 200 000 IIPROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 850 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT 11 Elm Creek to 400 feet south of Laguna Hills Drive (County of Orange) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 10 000 Construct Concrete $ 17 500 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 15 700 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 70 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 7 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 4 800 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 5 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 130 000 ENGINEERING (15%) $ 19 500 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 19 500 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 169 000 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 31 000 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 200 000 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT 600 feet north of Via Lomas to Via Lomas (County of Orange) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 1 300 Construct Concrete $ 15 000 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 4 800 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 0 Light Pole Relocation $ 2 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 0 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 0 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 23 100 ENGINEERING (151) $ 3 450 CONTINGENCY (151) $ 3 450 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 30 000 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 0 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 30 000 • • 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT S Moulton Parkway /Alicia Parkway intersection (City of Laguna Hills) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Earthwork $ 120 000 Drainage $ 97 000 Roadway Improvements $ 810 000 Traffic Items $ 144 000 Median Improvements & Landscaping $ 220 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 1 391 000 CONTINGENCY $ 209 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 600 000 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 0 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 600 000 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET SEGMENT Moulton Parkway /La Paz Road intersection (City of Laguna Hills) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Earthwork $ 71 660 Drainage $ 43 000 Roadway Improvements $ 558 340 Traffic Items $ 136 000 Median Improvements & Landscaping $ 20 000 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 829 000 ENGINEERING $ 75 500 CONTINGENCY (l0t) $ 82 900 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (15 %) $ 124 350 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 111 750 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 188 250 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 300 000 • • 1 ' COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT U Moulton Parkway /Oso Parkway intersection (City of Laguna Hills) ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION IIEarthwork $ 20 000 Drainage $ 19 700 II Roadway Improvements $ 700 665 Traffic Items $ 138 000 Median Improvements & Landscaping $ 27 500 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 905 865 ' ENGINEERING $ 76 000 CONTINGENCY (101) $ 90 585 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (151) $ 135 880 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 208 330 IIRIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 391 670 1 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 1 600 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • 1 1 COST ESTIMATE MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET 1 SEGMENT Aloma Avenue to Sardina /Saint Christopher (City of Laguna Niguel) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION Remove Miscellaneous Concrete $ 78 415 Construct Concrete $ 214 175 Construct Asphalt Concrete $ 306 610 Signal Relocation (installation) $ 225 000 Light Pole Relocation $ 3 000 Widen Bridge Structure $ 0 Block or Retaining Walls $ 49 600 Utility Pole Relocation $ 0 Relocate Inlets $ 97 500 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 974 300 CONTINGENCY (15 %) $ 146 200 ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 1 120 500 NOISE ATTENUATION $ 625 950 ENGINEERING $ 208 650 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION $ 131 400 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL $ 2 086 500 ddIN VIN3Wo3s \N011fl01Analld\COadNIM40 t/ L 96/622 ssaJ6ad dfl palloN O euolsell N d0 mod • Neel dfl Pallo?l lammillit kiewwns euolsalllry ssaJ6ad Neel, 96/622 :0360 AVM)1 JVd N011flOn .loafad uogoalsuo0 f uo@smboy AAA1 Z u61se0 i 10 PO CO ZO 10 PO 20 Z0 to PO CO ZO 10 PO 20 ZO 10 PO 20 30 L0 PO 20 Z0 10 eweNesel al 10 PO EO ZO - 11.03 0103 6003 6003 L003 9003 9003 VNV V1NVS JO A110 NOLL33SM31N1 U3oN103/NIVn 103rOild 1332115 .UVWS AVM)IaVd NO11l01N alnaaHoS 103r0Nd V 1N3n038 la MI MI MS 0 MI • OM UM NM a a e a a a \NO1lf10W\S31Id\fO21dNIM\ 3 4/ L 96 /U£ ddw aLN3INO3S O Quo4sa1MW d0 Fallon • auo4saIM Ise' df Pallod ssei6ad ssaJBad 41 Pa11o21 AiewwnS Hsel 9611£ .9190 AVMN21Vd NannoW :o atad ithimmie uo0om4suo0 f uomsinboV MM Z u&sa0 4 PO CO ZO 40 PO CO ZO LO 6O CO ZO 40 170 CO ZO 40 YO CO ZO 40 90 CO ZO 40 PO CO ZO 40 PO CO ZO LO awe? Asel 01 MU 100Z 0002 6661 8664 L661 9664 9664 VNV V1NVS JO A110 N01133s2131N12130N103/ON V210 103rO21d 133211S JAPANS AVMMJVd No11110W alnaaH0s 10311021d 81N3W03S la MI MI MS 0 MI • OM UM NM a a e a a a ddIN olN3Wo3S \NO1'1110W\S311d\foddNIM \O 1/ 1 96/L/C 0 auolsal!W d0 panoa • auolsaIi J dfl ssai6ad 9F 96/1/£ AyMN2lyd NO11f10W o 2 oJd O >Isel Pallo2! ssai6oId dfl Palloa ilimindlli Aiewwns Hsel umpnllsuo0 £ uogismboy mu Z u6isa0 OWEN gsel I. 01 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO OOOZ 6661 8664 L661 9661 9661 4664 E661 99-218 01 A3HO112J 1O3P021d 1332115 ltIVWS AVNOI21Vd N011f1OW VNV V1NVS AO A11O 311103H3S 1O3I0bid 31N3WO3S ddW' alN3141o3S\NO1111OIN\S311d\fo21dNIM4o 1/ 1 96/622 O auolsacIN 41 Mad �ISel dfl pandit' ssalGad dfl Pa1108l luewwnS • auolsallyy ssaJ6oJd Icel. 96/622 :aleO AVM)I21Vd NO1lf10W pa(o�d uolprulsuo0 f uol :Smbov wij y u61s80 1 PO CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO 10 PO CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO 10 40 20 ZO 10 40 20 ZO 10 eweN)1sel OI 6661 8661 L661 9661 5661 4661 NIlSfll AO A110 3f1N3AV 111H0321 O/3 .0041 01 SS-NS 103rOMd 133815 121VWS AVMNUVd N01lf1OW 31003HoS 1031'021d 01N3W°J3S ddW' I3 11103S\NO11f1O1MS311dWOHdNIMVO • • ssai6ad dfl Pollod ul O euolseIlI dO 001108 Noel dfl Pallo2l dISMINIMa kuwwns • GuolsmIM sser aid moos 40 l £0 I ZO 1 1 o l to { £O I ZO l FO 1 4 0 I £O OOZ O 1 1 0 1 40 [ £ O I O 110 I PO I £ 66I6L O � lO t I to 8661 O 110 £062 l ZOOZ 1 3321Oawvr O/M .004Z 01 3fN3AV T11Ha3H O/3 .00$411021.d 1O3r0Hd 133H1S 121VWS AVM)lHVd N0flfIOW 31f1O3HOS 1O3fOHd NI1Sf11 j0 A11O a r • s a a ee _ _ _ _ — — _ — 96/622 967622 oleo AVANIHvd NO1100IN 'pefad uoipnrlsuo3 u6lsao OWEN )Ise1 1. al 131N3W93S ddW73 19403S \NOlIfIOW\S311flO21dNIM\ O L/ L 96/622 O auolsap 4 dO Palloa Nsel dfl P0008 SSD/Bald dfl PMIIOH SS AiewwnS • auolsaliW SSOJ60Jd �lsel 96/6Z/Z :ale0 AVNUI21Vd NOlIfIOW .l�afad uollonilsuo0 y u6!sa0 1 £0 ZO LO PO CO ZO LO PO EC) ZO 10 PO CO Z0 LO PO CO ZO It) PO CO ZO L0 PC) CO ZO L0 aweN4lsel GI ZOOZ 100Z OOOZ 6661 9661 1661 9661 NIISf111O AlIO 30N3AV II9ONI03 /OVO21 HONV21 NI1Sfi1 1331.021d 133211S lHVWS AVMN8Vd NO11flOW 310O3HOS 103f0Nd Z31N3W03S ddW' 131 W 'J3S \N011f10W\Sa1I4\rOLIdNIM \:O I/ 1 96/6Z/Z ssai6ad d0 O auoisam dO pallou Nsel dfl pafo2l Newwn9 • auolsallyy ssaJ6ad Hsel 96/6Z/Z :ale0 AVMH2IVd N011f10W ioa(oid papa -_� uogonmuoo Z u6Isag !saO i CO ZO 10 6O CO ZO 10 4O CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO 10 PO CO ZO 10 4O CO ZO 10 90 CO ZO 10 OWEN4Sel CH 8661 L661 9661 9661 4661 8661 2661 NI1Sf11 AO A110 3f1N3AV OLI VANVH 0133b10819 Vf O/M ,004Z i33rO21d 133211S 1LIVWS AVM)IHVd N011f1OW 31f103H3S 1031O21d d 1N314,1038 ddIN E 1W03S\N011f1OLMS31IffOiidNIM \:0 L/ L 96/622 O euolsalj 01 Mod • Hsel df) PalloLl ssaifiwd dfl Pallnel amila ,GewwnS euolsaIM ssOJ6ad Hsel 96/622 :alea AVM)RIVd NO1ifOW :loe(oid uollorulsuo0 y uelseO 1 PO EO ZO LO PO CO ZO LO PO 20 Z0 LO PO CO ZO LO Pi) CO ZO LO PO 20 ZO 10 eweN61681 CI 6661 8661 1661 9661 9661 9661 NIISfll AO AlJO (39NVH3213INI ONOWVIO NVBLIn) oval 3321081AVf lV 3f1N3AV 18308103 103rO1:1d 1.33/11.6 12UVWS AVM)R)Vd NOffOW 31l03HOS 133rOLld 01N31103S NO =MI • NM OM MI MN MI MP - M MI SI i MI r ddWT 11 103S\N011110W\S3lld\fONdNIM\.O 1/ L 9616UZ O auolsal!W ssaJ6oid dfl Polion lam.mmilh d0 palloN • dfl auo)saIIW ssaJ6ad Hsel 96 /6Z/Z ale0 AVMNLIVd NO1lf1OW Pefoid Hsel papa tiewwng uoipmisuoO £ uogsinboV wee Z u6hsa0 L 40 ED ZO 10 4D CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO 10 PO CO ZO LO •0 CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO LO ewer 9301 01 CO ZO LO ZOOZ 1003 0003 6661 8661 L66L 9661 3NIA211 .4O A110 (3NVl N21f111HOId 3321.4 9M) CVOS A321443f lV 3A180 1:131N33 3NIALN 133fO21d 13321.1.9 DAMS AVMNNVd NO1lloW 31f103HOS 1O3fO21d f1N319038 01 s n- I n N MI MN a -_• NM MO (03NOI110N00 213d021tld NOl1fOW "13h30) Gf �'Z1S 01 NO/,NtlO ONtlS 103`Otid 133Dn03HOS 103 O d ddW 1:11403S \ N01.1110VV \ ST114\ rOddNIAAVO II L 96/6Z2 O auolsallIN dfl pallotl Hsel d0 Pa11o21 ssaibad dill Pa110d ilhimilal tiewwnS • auolsal!W ssai6ad Hsel 961622 a1e0 AVM)121Vd N011fOW Pafmd uogismbovwd Z u6isaO 1 10 40 CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO 10 PO CO ZO 10 PO CO ZO 10 PO £0 ZO 10 aweN 49e1 01 CO ZO 666L 9661 L661 9661 9661 4661 3N1A211 JO 4110 (03NOI110N00 213d013A30) (S3NV1 9 01 4 WOiid N30IM) 3A1210 2131N30 3N1A211 103PO21d 133211S121VWS AVMM1Vd NO11f1O1A1 311103HOS 1031"O21d 11N3W038 M Ola s s a a MN MN a a MO MI ddW'W 1I O3V4O11110W\S3lld\fO21dNIM\ 0 L/ L 96 /6Z/Z O auosaiM d0 Pa11021 • auo2sapj dfl ssa.16ad 96 /63/? :men AVMNWd NOJJfOW :2oafad 8sel Pa11o2l ssaiewd dfl Palloel iilli Aiewwn$ )Ise , uonaru4suo0 £ uoglsinbov Nal Z u6isa0 i ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 co ZO 10 40 EC) ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO PO CO ZO 10 40 CO ZO LO 01110N 4s91 01 3 0002 6661 8661 L661 9661 9661 OOId1OVd 13 01 3A11:10 1932104 3)1V1 103rOdld 1332115 1NVIAIS AVM021Vd N011fOW A1NfO0 31003HOS 103rOild W 1N3WO3S we a_ ma m_ it = a a a la SUM IS I 01 ddIN N1 WO3S \N011f1OW\S3lld \rO21dNIM \:O 1/ 1 96 /6Z/Z - O auoisaidry d0 pello2l Hsel dfl pello2l ssaJ6wd dfl pelloil aa AiewwnS • euolsallW ssai60Jd HseL 96 /6ZIZ :a3e0 AVMN21Vd N011f1OW :Polak! vo!lorulsuoO £ uol8snboV wa y u61sa0 1 40 £0 ZD LO 90 co ZO LO 170 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 6O CO ZO LO PO CO ZO LO eweNpIsel OI OOOZ 6661 9661 L661 9661 9661 4661 t661 ALNfOO VINVW V1NVS 01 O01dI3Vd 13 1O31O21d 133211S 121VWS AVM)RIVd NO1111O91 31f103HOS 1O31O21d N 1N3WO3S NM Mil MI MIN Nig MN UM dal d IIN03S \NO1111OPV153l1d\fOUdNINN O auolsallyy d(1 pa110U S Ass/ d(1 papa VIS3191 VIA Ol Z31UOO 311V0 OIN 00Z1 1O3rOUd 133U n03 ON AVM111Vd NO11IIOW ddW 0 1W03S \N011f1OW\S3lld\fOi8dNIM \:O L/ L 96/62/Z ssaBad df P9IIo2 O auolsallW dfl PaII021 Ise' do Palloii S tiewwnS • euolsallW ssai6ad Hsel 96/622 :e4e0 AyMNyd NOl10W :Polak' li U0Il0N1SU00 £ uoms!nboy MR1 Z uthsa0 1 40 EO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO •0 EO ZO LO VO CO CO LO 4O EO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO 40 CO ZO LO ewEN OBI 0I OOOZ 6661 8661 L661 9661 9661 4661 £661 A1Nf100 S11IH VNflOyl as 004 O1 )133801A113 1031"02Id 133211S DAMS AVMNdyd N011fOW 31f103HOS 1031121d 0 IN31/403S MI S INN ION MI =II I= UM MN =II WM MI OM NM MO MI I ddW 1-111035N011110114\ S311A\FO'ddNIMVO 961E12 aww0 AVM)1UVd winnow :paloid NOI133SN31NI VI0I1V!NO11(lOW 1031132:1d 133211S 1NVWS AVNUINVd NO11nOW 31f1O3HOS 103fOHJd ddW. S- 1W03S \N01111014WS311APO'1dNIM\ O OUa3SU31NI ZVd'rllN0 tld NOI��O� 1O3f021d 13 3-U103H S 103f021d 03S2131NI OSOINOIIROW 133108d 13331n03N75 AV Olid d NOlIfOW ddW'A 1WO3S \NO11f10W\S31IJ\fO21dNIM\0 N1 O auolsaim dfl Pa11021 Nsel dfl Pa11o21 ssaJ6md dfl P01108 lima& A/ewwng • 9616Z/Z 96/622 ale0 AVMN2iVd N01ll0W loafad • • 4 0 i E O I Z O I t O I Y O I E O I Z O I 10 POI£OIZOI10POICOI ZOI 10 POICOIZOI LOIPOI £OIZOI1O 000Z 6661 866E 2661 9661 S661 S111N VNfOV1 AO MAO S11161I1 A1.10 3H1 NIHIIM S1fONMnl Sf19 /SONnSI NVI03W 103r0Hd 133211S 121VWS AVMNNVd N011f10161 31003H0s 1031'Oad uthionnsuo0 u6isa0 aweN 3ISe1 L 0I AlN3WO3S MI r___- I MO MO WO MI MB NM NIII ■IN ddWMM 1WO3S \N011f1OW\S311.4 21dNIM\ 3 • • 11 1 auolseI W dN Pallo2l ssel dfl Pajoil ssaa6ad dfl PalloH Newwns • ssaJ6oJd 40 I £O I ZO LO 40 I CO I ZO I 10 4 0 j £O I ZO 1 1 0 4 0 I CO I ZO I to I CO 1 1 O C O I 10 E0OZ ZOOZ LOOZ 0002 6661 (S3NVl 9 O1 N30W1 1):13Hd01S121H0INIVS/VNIONVS 01 3f1N3AV VWO1V 103rONd 1332115 .LdVWS AVM)l avd NO1lflOW 31f103HOS 1O31"O21d 13f1OIN VNnnOV1 dO A11O - M r_- N s— s n -_— MI IS NB MI OM MN 96/6Z11 96 /61/Z :a ;eO AVMN2lVd N011fOW Pafad uoipnilSUOD uogismboV Ml21 u6!sa0 ewEN MIse1 E L OI M 1N3WO3S • TABLE 2 -5 • CIMP - POST 2010 ADT'S & LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE FROM TO ADT CAPACITY V/C LOS MAIN ST STANDARD AVE GRAND AVE SR -55 S/B SR -55 N/B RED HILL AVE JAMBOREE HARVARD AVE CULVER DR YALE AVE JEFFREY RD SAND CANYON AVE LAGUNA CANYON BARRANCA PKWY ALTON PKWY I-405 N/B I-405 S/B BAKE PKWY LAKE FOREST RIDGE ROUTE SANTA MARIA EL TORO RD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA PKVY LA PAZ RD OSO PARKWAY SJHTC N/B SJHTC S/B ALISO CREEK ED CROWN VALLEY PKWY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS BEACON HILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONEHILL DR SELVA RD PACIFIC COAST HWY (64997)0218 STANDARD AVE GRAND AVE SR -55 S/B SR -55 N/B RED HILL AVE JAMBOREE HARVARD AVE CULVER DR YALE AVE JEFFREY RD SAND CANYON AVE LAGUNA CANYON BARRANCA PKWY ALTON PKWY I-405 N/B I-405 S/B BAKE PKWY LAKE FOREST RIDGE ROUTE SANTA MARIA EL TORO RD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA PKWY LA PAZ RD 050 PARKWAY SJETC N/B SJHTC S/B ALISO CREEK RD CROWN VALLEY PKWY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS BEACON HILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONEHILL DR SELVA RD PACIFIC COAST HVY DEL PRADO AVE 2 -14 56000 46900 1 19 F 57000 56300 1 01 F 42000 56300 0 75 C 39000 37500 1 04 F 42000 37500 1 12 F 47000 37500 1 25 F 55000 37500 1 47 F 63000 46900 1 34 F 44000 56300 0 78 C 50000 56300 0 89 D 43000 56300 0 76 C 58000 56300 1 03 F 53000 56300 0 94 E 59000 56300 1 05 F 64000 56300 1 14 F 65000 56300 1 15 F 60000 56300 1 07 F 59000 56300 1 05 F 58000 56300 1 03 F 60000 56300 1 07 F 52000 56300 0 92 E 61000 56300 1 08 F 49000 56300 0 87 D 50000 56300 0 89 D 45000 56300 0 80 C 47000 56300 0 83 D 51000 56300 0 91 E 32000 56300 0 57 A 41000 56300 0 73 C 46000 56300 0 82 D 58000 56300 1 03 F 57000 37500 1 52 F 43000 56300 0 76 C 39000 56300 0 69 B 34000 37500 0 91 E 33000 56300 0 59 A 36000 56300 0 64 B 31000 46900 0 66 B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • TABLE 2 -6 CIMP - POST 2010 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (V/Right Tura Overlap) NO N/S STREET E/V STREET AM PEAK HR PM PEAK HR V/C LOS V/C LOS 1 9 12 20 21f 25 29f 31f 32f 33 37 39 42 45 46f 47 49 53 54 57f 62 67 70 72 78 80 83 88 91 95f 96f 100 104 110 118 127 130 144 147 153 155 NUN STANDARD GRAND SR -55 SB RAMS NEWPORT AVE RED HILL TUSTIN RANCH RD JAMBOREE /ETC SB JAMBOREE /ETC NB HARVARD CULVER YALE JEFFREY SAND CANYON AVE LAGUNA CANYON RD BARRANCA PKWY ALTON PKVY ENTERPRISE /I-405 1-405 SB RAMS BAKE PKWY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKWY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKWY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKWY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY MOULTON PKVY GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN GOLDEN LANTERN (54989)0803 EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR N IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR LAKE FOREST DR RIDGE ROUTE DR SANTA MARIA EL TORO ROAD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA LA PAZ OSO PARKWAY SJHTC NB SJHTC SB ALISO CREEK ROAD CROWN VALLEY PKWY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS DR BEACON HILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONE HILL DR SELVA PACIFIC COAST HWY DEL PRADO 2 -15 1 46 F 1.29 P 0 89 D 0 83 D 2 22 F 2.33 P 0 67 B 1 09 F 1 68 F 2.09 F 1 43 F 1.24 F 1 78 F 1 60 F 0 96 E 0 87 D 0 67 B 1 04 F 0 83 D 1 24 F 1 02 P 1.07 F 0 47 A 0 62 B 0 73 C 0 82 D 0 68 B 0 90 D 1 12 P 1.08 P 1 10 F 0 60 A 0 79 C 1.14 F 0 90 D 1 11 F 1 27 F 1.47 P 1 12 F 1.16 P 1.19 F 1.54 F 1 11 F 0 89 D 1.05 F 1 14 F 1.24 F 1 50 P 0.95 E 1 25 F 1.04 F 1 04 F 0 67 B 0 93 E 0 84 D 0 89 D 0 47 A 1 04 P 1 06 F 1 17 F 1.24 F 1 35 F 1 30 F 1.29 P 0 36 A 0 39 A 064 B 074 C 0 70 B 0 77 C 0 59 A 0 64 B 0.97 E 0 92 E 0 29 A 0 55 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • TABLE 3-8 • L-J0S - POST 2010 ADT'S & LINK LEVEL OF SERVICE FROM To ADT CAPACITY V/C LOS MAIN ST STANDARD AVE GRAND AVE SR -55 S/B SA -55 N/B NEWPORT AVE RED HILL AVE TUSTIN RANCH RD JAMBOREE HARVARD AVE CULVER DR YALE AVE JEFFREY RD SAND CANYON AVE LAGUNA CANYON BARRANCA PKVY ALTON PKWY I-405 N/B 1 -405 S/B BAKE PKWY LAKE FOREST RIDGE ROUTE SANTA MARIA EL TORO RD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA PKWY LA PAZ RD OSO PARKWAY SJHTC N/B SJHTC S/B ALISO CREEK RD CROWN VALLEY PKWY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS BEACON HILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONEHILL DR SELVA RD PACIFIC COAST HWY (24705)0218 STANDARD AVE GRAND AVE SR -55 S/B SR -55 N/B NEWPORT AVE RED HILL AVE TUSTIN RANCH RD JAMBOREE HARVARD AVE CULVER DR YALE AVE JEFFREY RD SAND CANYON AVE LAGUNA CANYON BARRANCA PKWY ALTON PKWY I -405 N/B I -405 S/B BAKE PKWY LAKE FOREST RIDGE ROUTE SANTA MARIA EL TORO RD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA PKWY LA PAZ RD OSO PARKWAY SJBTC N/B SJHTC S/B ALISO CREEK RD CROWN VALLEY PKVY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS BEACON RILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONEHILL DR SELVA RD PACIFIC COAST HWY DEL PRADO AVE 3 -23 59000 56300 1.05 F 60000 56300 1 07 F 54000 56300 0 96 E 57000 56300 1 01 F 66000 56300 1.17 F 60000 56300 1 07 F 74000 56300 1 31 F 60000 56300 1.07 F 80000 56300 1 42 F 77000 75000 1 03 F 52000 56300 0.92 E 54000 56300 0 96 E 45000 56300 0 80 C 56000 56300 0 99 E 55000 75000 0 73 C 60000 75000 0 80 C 65000 75000 0 87 D 65000 75000 0.87 D 60000 75000 0 80 C 60000 75000 0 80 C 57000 56300 1 01 F 59000 56300 1.05 F 51000 56300 0 91 E 59000 56300 1 05 F 49000 56300 0.87 D 50000 56300 0 89 D 46000 56300 0.82 D 49000 56300 0 87 D 53000 56300 0.94 E 33000 56300 0 59 A 42000 56300 0 75 C 46000 56300 0.82 D 59000 56300 1 05 F 60000 56300 1.07 F 45000 56300 0 80 C 41000 56300 0.73 C 34000 56300 0 60 A 35000 56300 0.62 B 37000 56300 0 66 B 31000 46900 0.66 B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • • TABLE 3 -9 L-J0S - POST 2010 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (W /Right Turn Overlap) N0. N/S STREET E/V STREET AM PEAK HR PM PEAK HR V/C LOS V/C LOS 1 MAIN 9 STANDARD 12 GRAND 20 SR -55 SB RAMPS 21f NEWPORT AVE 25 RED HILL 29f TUSTIN RANCH RD 31f JAMBOREE /ETC SB 32f JAMBOREE /ETC NB 33 HARVARD 37 CULVER 39 YALE 42 JEFFREY 45 SAND CANYON AVE 46f LAGUNA CANYON RD 47 BARRANCA PKWY 49 ALTON 53 ENTERPRISE /I -405 54 I-405 SB RAMPS 57f BAKE PKWY 62 MOULTON PKWY 67 MOULTON PKWY 70 MOULTON PKWY 72 MOULTON PKWY 78 MOULTON PKWY BO MOULTON PKWY 83 MOULTON PKWY 88 MOULTON PKWY 91 MOULTON PKWY 95f MOULTON PKWY 96f MOULTON PKWY 100 MOULTON PKWY 104 MOULTON PKWY 110 GOLDEN LANTERN 118 GOLDEN LANTERN 127 GOLDEN LANTERN 130 GOLDEN LANTERN 144 GOLDEN LANTERN 147 GOLDEN LANTERN 153 GOLDEN LANTERN 155 GOLDEN LANTERN (21723)0727 EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER EDINGER IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR N IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR IRVINE CENTER DR LAKE FOREST DR RIDGE ROUTE DR SANTA MARIA EL TORO ROAD GLENWOOD DR LAGUNA HILLS DR ALICIA LA PAZ OSO PARKWAY SJHTC NB SJHTC SB ALISO CREEK ROAD CROWN VALLEY PKWY PASEO DE COLINAS MARINA HILLS DR BEACON HILL CAMINO DEL AVION STONEHILL DR SELVA PACIFIC COAST HWY DEL PRADO 3 -24 1 04 F 1 17 F 0 72 C 0 89 D 1 63 F 1.37 F 0 86 D 1 14 F 0 88 D 0 76 C 1 46 F 1.56 F 0 94 E 1 16 F 0 82 D 0 83 D 0 63 B 0 61 B 1 30 F 1 23 F 0 93 E 0 85 D 0 48 A 0 54 A 0 87 D 0 85 D 0 81 D 0 74 C 0 51 A 0 59 A 0 63 B 0 60 A 0 55 A 0 93 E 0 79 C 0 73 C O 98 E 0 60 A 0 73 C 1 24 F 0 80 C 0 99 E O 92 E 0 89 D 1 08 F 0 82 D 0 89 D 0 99 E 0 95 E 0 70 B 0 89 D 0 97 E 0 95 E 1 18 F 0 99 E 1 06 F O 90 D 0 96 E 0 46 A 0 76 C 0 75 C 0 76 C 0 61 B 0 67 B 0 86 D 0 79 C 0 87 D 0 85 D 0 77 C 0 60 A 0 45 A 0 38 A 0 63 B 0 70 B 0 71 C 0 70 B 0 61 B 0 62 B 049 A 068 B 0 30 A 0 62 B i • 1 MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ERRATA SHEET The following corrections should be noted in the text of the Implementation 1 Plan 1 1 On pages 15 18 22 23 and in the Funding Matrix after page 23 the cost estimate for Segment X should be listed as $ 600 000 in place of $ 0 This revision brings the total project cost to $ 81 491 500 1 A cost estimate breakdown was not included for this segment because the current schedule lists this project as not being constructed until Post -2010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Project Segment County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, Transportation Programs MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET EXHIBIT 1 fal r IRVINE FFW SAN r TA a y 9 (API r EYiPO AG SAN LAC B _ c r 1 Legend • • Completed Intersections Completed Links County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, Transportation Programs r MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET COMPLETED LINKS & INTERSECTIONS EXHIBIT 2 eF.q SAN IA yCAPI 0 0 Deficient Intersections Deficient Links County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, Transportation Programs MOULTON PARKWAY SMART STREET FUTURE DEFICIENT LINKS & INTERSECTIONS EXHIBIT 3