Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1986 04 07 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APRIL 7, 1986 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION 'The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:04 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Hoesterey, and the Invocation was given by ~' Councilman Edgar. I I. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronal d B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy ~' Counci 1 persons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director Captain Wakefield, Pol ice Department Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 80 in the audience I I I. PROCLAMATIONS r-- 1. KEN HOESTEREY - VOLUNTEER FOR SENIOR PROGRAMS Mayor Greinke read a proclamation honoring Ken Hoesterey for his many volunteer services in senior programs. Mr. Hoesterey thanked the Council. 84 2. NORMAN METZGER - PRESIDENT OF WESTMED GOLD CLUB · Mayor Greinke presented a proclamation to Norm Metzger commending him on his recent selection as President of the Westmed Gold Club. Mr. Metzger expressed his thanks to the Council. 84 3. SAMUEL LYONS - COMMUNITY SERVICE At the Mayor's request, Police Chief Thayer and Captain Wakefield escorted Mr. Samuel Lyons to the speakers' podium. The Nayor then presented Mr. Lyons with a proclamation in recognition of his many community services. Mr. Lyons eloquently thanked the Council. He then introduced Ernest Elchlepp, new president of Reason Buick Company. 84 Tova Griffith, President of the Tustin Chamber of Commerce, pre- sented Mr. Lyons with a lifetime membership in the Chamber in appreciation of his many years of support and good humor. IV. COMMUNITY NOTES 1, COMMUNITY EXCURSIONS AND EVENTS Mayor Greinke announced the following excursions and events: :'Las Vegas Turnaround, April 26 and 27, 1986 Catalina Cruise and Tours, May 17, 1986 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off, June 1, 1986 Tustin Historical Society Tenth Anniversary Victorian Garden Party, May 4, 1986 General Municipal Election, April 8, 1986 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 4-7-86 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2b - REVISIONS TO THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 86-45 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Communit~ Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the CQmmunity Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:25 p.m~~ There ~'- were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to: 1) Direct staff to make appropriate changes to the Browning Corri- dor definition (reference Page 10, first paragraph); 2) Direct staff to show the Eastern Corridor on all future docu- ments as recently agreed upon by Tustin and Irvine; 3) Direct staff to reflect the current status of flights from John Wayne Airport (reference Page 11, last paragraph); and ~ 4) Adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO, 86-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2b AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE NOISE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN The motion carried 5-0. 56 Councilwoman Kennedy requested that the noise ordinance be updated to reflect the new policies as contained in Attachment A to Resolu- tion No. 86-45 and brought back to Council. 2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2c - 1101 SYCAMORE AVENUE The Community Development Director presented the staff report and ; recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The Director responded to Council questions. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. Mike Fields, 3700 Parkview I-C, Irvine, spoke in favor of General Plan Amendment 86-2c. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:36 p.m. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c on the basis that it is "in the public inter- est" by bringing a high-quality medical care facility into Tustin. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the Community Development Director stated that the property is presently approved as an apartment project for long-term or non-transient rental occupancy. If changed to Public & Institutional (P&I), all uses would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). If the hospital converted the apartments from long-term occupancy to short-term transiency for outpatient residency, it would constitute a change in use requiring a use permit which Council could approve or deny, and would be viewed as a violation of its present approved land use. Transiency' is normally considered up to 30 days. Hotels/motels are not sup- posed to exceed that and must pay a transient occupancy tax for such. The Community Development Director responded to Council questions regarding R-3 vs. P&I zone regulations. He noted that if the hos- pital had any intention of using the property for residential-type purposes such as short-term or outpatient, they would be wisest to leave it zoned R-3. In response to the Mayor, Mr. Fields provided a preliminary time- table of when development plans for subject property will be brought back to Council. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 4-7-86 Councilwoman Kennedy stated that there has not been any real assur- ance the property will not be used for drug or alcohol rehabilita- tion. When the new building was approved, the size of the hospital actually reduced. The building now being constructed is four sto- ries and is a medical office building although many people think it is a hospital. Mr. Fields responded that the second, third and fourth floors will be medical offices for physicians. The entire first floor is ~'- devoted toward ambulatory services (one-day surgery, pharmacy, : ~ physical therapy, all outpatient services) to provide more out- patient services. He assured Councilwoman Kennedy that the hospi- tal will not be reduced further. Councilwoman Kennedy also expressed concern regarding building height. She asked about the possibility of a tenant relocation program. Mayor Greinke expressed opposition to relocation benefits in this instance. The amendment to the motion by Saltarelli to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c with the provision that tenants be allowed up to nine months for relocation purposes if requested died for lack of a second. The amendment to the motion by Greinke to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c with the provision that the applicant submit a development plan to Council within 14 months died for lack of a second. Further Council discussion followed. Councilman Edgar questioned placing a condition on the general plan amendment. The Community Development Director concurred, stating ... that at the General Plan Amendment stage, nothing can be done to ~ condition same. However, the zone change process at the Planning Commission level must immediately follow, which would then come to Council. Recent legislation has allowed councils to condition zone changes with the applicant's concurrence. At that point, the Coun- cil could condition such things as number of months to vacate the property, or perhaps a relocation package stipulating a month's free rent. Such conditions could be put into the zone change only if the hospital agreed to same. The original motion by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve General Plan Amendment 86-2c on the basis that it is "in the public interest" by bringing a high-quality medical care facility into Tustin carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed for reasons stated. 56 3, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2e - 1800 SAN JUAN STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 86-42 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke expressed surprise that at a recent meeting of The Church of Latter Day Saints, no mention was made of this proposed .'- amendment. He requested that the Director advise the church bishop of Council action on same. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO, 86-42 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 1800 SAN JUAN STREET Carried 5-0. 56 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 4-7-86 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86-2f -13881-13895 BROWNING AVENUE - RESO- LUTION NO. 86-43 The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated April 7, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 8:08 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. Councilman Hoesterey wondered how many other parcel s under County jurisdiction were zoned single-family but developed as multi- family, and the potential for it reoccurring in the future. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to deny Gen- eral Plan Amendment 86-2f. Council discussion followed regarding spot zoning in general and rezoning subject property to PUD-Residential. The motion carried 5-0. 56 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to direct staff to report back to Planning Commission and Council (recognizing the idea of PUD) with a zone change recommendation; and if necessary, recommend a General Plan Amendment that would not perpetrate what is there but have a practicality of accepting what we can do. Motion carried 5-0. 56 Note: Pursuant to Council action to deny General Plan Amendment ~f, the following resolution was not adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 86-43 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 13881 TO 13895 BROWNING, FROM (SF) SINGLE-FAMILY TO (MF) MULTI-FAMILY RECESS - REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY - RECONVENED At Councilwoman Kennedy's request, the meeting was recessed to the Redevelopmerit Agency at 8:19 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:41 p.m. with all members present. VI. PUBLIC INPUT Eileen Sally Vining, 400 West Main Street, thanked the Council for its action-on March 17, 1986, to discontinue the study on any overl,~y zon- ing of Main Street. Mayor Greinke graciously thanked Mrs. Vining for her comments. VII. CONSENT CALENDAR Items 5 and 6 were removed from the Consent Calendar by Greinke, and Item 10 by Hoesterey. It was then movedby Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, Carried - . to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. 5-0 1. APPROVAl, OF MINUTES - MARCH 7, 1986, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,325,508.66 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $142,388.80 50 3. APPLICATION TO FILE LATE CLAIM - YATSUE NAKAHARA, CLAIM NO. 86-6 Denied the Application to File Late Claim and directed the City Clerk to notify claimant and claimant's representative of such* denial, as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 4-7-86 4. RESOLUTION NO. 86-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 (Community Park- lands Act of 1986) Adopted Resolution No. 86-44 as recommended by the Director of Community and Administrative Services. 77 7. RESOLUTION NO. 86-46 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BELL AVENUE STORM DRAIN EXTENSION AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVER- /"' TISE FOR BIDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-46 as recommended by the Engineering : Division. 91 8. RESOLUTION NO. 86-38 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CA, IN SUPPORT OF THE REMOTE ACCESS NETWORK OF THE CALIFORNIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (CAL-ID) Adopted Resolution No. 86-38 as recommended by the Chief of Police. 82 9. RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS RIGHTS TO WALNUT AVENUE Approved the relinquishment of access rights to Walnut Avenue from Tract No. 10815; and authorized the Mayor to execute a Quitclaim Deed for said relinquishment, subject to City approval of a plan for said work, as recommended by the Direc- tor of Public Works/City Engineer. 49 Consent Calendar Item No. 5 - Fourth of July Fireworks Contract - The Director of Community and Administrative Services responded to Mayor Greinke that staff could attempt to negotiate a penalty clause for a late show start. All contracts contain the same protection for the City indemnity-wise. She highly commended Pyro Spectaculars' past per- formance record vs. San Diego Fireworks, which was contracted in 1985. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve the following: 5. FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS CONTRACT Authorize the City Manager to execute agreement in the amount of $8,900 between the City and Pyro Spectacular Fireworks Com- pany to provide a pyro-musical show for the Annual Fourth of July Celebration as recommended by the Community Services Department. The motion carried 5-0. 45; 86-17 Consent Calendar Item No. 6 - E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook- Off - Council concurred with Mayor Greinke's request to defer this item to coincide with New Business No. 2 (see Page 8). 6. EL CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF - JUNE 1, 1986 Appropriate $2,000 from the General Fund as seed money for the 1986 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. 41 Consent Calendar Item No, 10 - Compensation of Part-Time Employees - Following a question-and answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, sec- onded by Saltarelli, to adopt the following: 10. RESOLUTION NO. 86-37 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RELATING TO THE COMPENSATION OF PART-TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN Carried 5-0. 79 VlII~ ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION 1. CONTXNUEU CONSIDERATION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-8 - PROHIBITION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS - ORDINANCE NO. 954 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 4-7-86 The Community Development Director presented the staff report as contained in his inter-com dated April 7, 1986. Frank Greinke, Jr., representing the Tustin Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber's position is the ordinance is not needed because adequate protection exists for the City to prevent anything drastic from happening in Tustin, and the intent of the law,~as not to abolish waste oil. Councilwoman Kennedy stated that the ordinance was never meant to intimidate service stations from recycling motor oil. The idea was that Tustin did not want to be a regional center for toxic waste. If Council is hesitant to adopt an ordinance, she suggested a resolution which would let the entire county know that Tustin will not tolerate, or go through the use permit process, for a toxic waste center in Tustin. Councilman Edgar concurred with the Chamber's position that if a transfer station was proposed, it would have to go through the individual use permit process. Council would then be obliged on the basis of the data at that particular time, to make a ruling. He felt it not necessary to create laws to attempt to streamline every use that could ever be proposed. Councilman Hoesterey stated he was in favor of the ordinance until he attended meetings of the Chamber and Orange County Fire Depart- ment and learned that 700 common chemicals are listed as hazar- dous. He noted that there is probably no business in ton that does not have hazardous materials. He did not see how Council could definitively structure an ordinance now that wouldr!send a message to the county that says "donmt ever come here." Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli concurred with Councilwoman Kennedy. He stated Tustin is a small town, it is the only city divided into three county supervisorial districts, and political decisions seem to wind up in Tustin. He felt it wise that Tustin go on record that it does not want certain wastes or transfer stations. He suggested that Council ask legal staff to research the area and find out what the State and County preempt, and then perhaps con- sider a position paper or resolution that states there are certain things Tustin finds unacceptable. After further discussion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct legal staff to come back with a resolution or ~ which would make Tustin's position clear that it does not intend to have a toxic waste transfer station within its city boundaries. ~ Councilman Hoesterey expressed concern that if Tustin does not address the matter on a regional basis, there will be an increase in illegal dumping of toxic wastes. Councilwoman Kennedy responded that illegal dumping is already a problem, and government must now take a position to assist industry in disposing of toxic waste and resolve the illegal dumping problem. She noted that with the mam- moth traffic problems in the City, Tustin is an unlikely safe site for a toxic waste transfer station. Frank Greinke, Jr., reiterated the Chamber's position on the mat- ter. The motion carried 5-0. 102 Note: There was no Council action on the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 954 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 PROHIBITING THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS WITH- IN THE CITY LIMITS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 4-7-86 IX. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - ORDINANCE NO. 964 & RESOLUTION NO. 86-14 The Community Development Director presented the staff report. He stated he has met with the Chamber of Commerce and Orange County Fire Department regarding the Chamber's concerns. The Director stated that the City enpowers the County to enforce fees. Council must decide whether it desires the County to bill the City or bill the businesses directly. Mayor Greinke declared an abstention on the matter. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli presided. The City Manager clarified that this is State mandated and it is now a question of who will pay for it. The deadline for enactment of this has passed. Fire Marshall Mike Cate spoke regarding the fees and the exception for packaged containers. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue the following to April 21 and to have some information regarding fees. ORDINANCE NO. 964 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESOLUTION NO. 86-14 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN NAMING THE ORANGE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT AS THE AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 2185 The motion carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. 102 Mayor Greinke resumed the Chair. 2. EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COMMUNITY - ORDINANCE NO. 966 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 966 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 966 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordi- nance No. 966 be passed and adopted as follows: · ORDINANCE NO. 966 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING FROM PLANNED COMMUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/RESI- DENTIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMERCIAL; PLANNED COMMUNITY/MIXED USE AND PLANNED COMMUNITY/COMMUNITY FACILITIES FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY: THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5) TO THE SOUTH; EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN AND THE UNINCORPORATED COMMUNI- TIES OF LEMON HEIGHTS AND COWAN HEIGHTS TO THE WEST; UNINCORPORATED LAND TO THE NORTH; AND UNINCORPORATED AREA WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE LINE (MYFORD ROAD) FOR THE CITY OF IRVINE TO THE EAST ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY 1,740 ACRES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS EAST TUSTIN (EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO). Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke,.Hoesterey, Saltarelli NOES: Kennedy 81 ABSENT: None 3, EAST TUSTIN PLANNED COMMUNITY - ORDINANCE NO. 967 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 967 have. second reading by title only. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 967 by the City Clerk, it was moved -. Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 967 be passed and adopted as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 4-7-86 ORDINANCE NO. 967 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING SECTION 3.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8) AND EXHIBIT "C" AS THE LAND USE PLAN. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Saltarelli NOES: Kennedy ABSENT: None 81 X. OLD BUSINESS ; None. XI. NEW BUSINESS 1. COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK CONCESSION STAND PROPOSAL As recommended in the inter-com dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Community Services Department, it was moved by Saltarelli, sec- onded b), Edgar, that a concession is appropriate at Columbus Tustin snack bar, and to direct Community Services staff and City Attorney to work together to ensure that all legal requirements are met in the process of establishing the Columbus Tustin Park Concession stand. Mayor Greinke expressed that he thought the concession stand was a good idea. He asked if the proceeds would go to the organization or to the City. The Director of Community and Administrative Ser- vices responded that staff will report back on same. She stated that the City cannot preclude what the contractor will do. The contract does contain a clause that a certain percentage of the monthly gross will be paid to the City. The motion carried 5-0. 41 The City Manager will consult with the City Attorney on whether such a proposal requires open, competitive bids. 2. SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE - CHILI COOK-OFF AND TUSTIN TILLER DAYS Council considered this item in conjunction with Consent Calendar Item rio. 6. Consent Calendar Item No. 6 - E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off- The Recreation Superintendent clarified that the seed money will be replaced and then the profits will go to the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the fol 1 owi ng: 6. EL CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF - JUNE 1, 1986 Appropriated $2,000 from the General Fund as seed money for the 1986 E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off as recommended by the Recreation Superintendent. Motion carried 5-0. 41 New Business Item No. 2 - Special Event Insurance - Chili Cook-Off and Tustin Tiller Days - The City Manager stated that the Council should appropriate money for insurance for the event. It was moved by Greinke, seconded byEdgar, to appropriate $~0,000 for insurance for the E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-Off and the Tustin Tiller Days events. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was made b~, Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to continue the matter to April 21, 1986. Carried 5-0. 41 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 4-7-86 3. ESTABLISFNENT OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE - STREET NAME CHANGE FROM JAMBOREE ROAD TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 As recommended in the inter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Edgar, · seconded by Saltarelli, to: 1) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 86-47 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF JAMBOREE ROAD, BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND BRYAN AVENUE, TO TUSTIN RANCH ROAD * ~ 2) Establish the public hearing time and date to be at 7:00 p.m. . ' on Monday, May 5, 1986. Carried 5-0. 96 4. AWARD OF BID - POLICE COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MODIFICATIONS · Bids for subject project were received as follows: Ultimo General Contractors, Dana Point $16,322.00 South Coast Construction, Inc., E1Toro $16~870.00 Department of Interior Construction Co., Irvine $17.500.00 Means & Ulrich Contractors, Santa Ana $17.700.00 Lenn Freeman General Contractors, E1Toro $21.000.00 Seashore Interiors, Irvine $22 650.00 Jen-Beck Associates, Inc., Santa Ana $31 965.00 Adams/Mallory Construction, Startton $32 685.00 ; The third bidder was the lowest bidder who complied with all instructions during the bidding process. Pursuant to the recom- mendation contained in the inter-com dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Chief of Police, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by ~o; to award the contract for subject project to Department of ~ Construction Company, Irvine, in the amount of $17,500.00. Carried 5-0. 82 RECESS - RECONVENED The meeting was recessed at 10:08 p.m. by Mayor Greinke. The meeting was reconvened at 10:16 p.m. with all members present. 5. FOOTHILL/EASTERN/I-5 BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS & TOLL ROAD FEASIBILITY STUDY The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom- mendation as contained in his inter-com dated March 26, 1986, not- ing attachments describing the four project alternatives. Mayor Greinke suggested several changes in the letter which he felt make Tustin's position more assertive as follows: Alternative #2, second sentence - "The consultants should address these potential lane requirements as they . . " Alternative #3 - "A quantitative amount of relief to traffic con- gestion should be indicated . . ." "Additionally, the study team should address any additional impacts . . ." Page 2, second paragraph, last sentence - "Widening would destroy the business community along this roadway with displacements." Page 2, third paragraph - ',The Arterial Alternative should include any upgrading . " Councilman Edgar suggested that the letter as modified be sent. In addition, he suggested Council adopt a resolution stating Tustin's strong opposition to Irvine Boulevard and Moulton Parkway as CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 4-7-86 "super" streets, and opposition to double decking of the,~Z-5/55 Freeways. It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Edgar, to: 1) Authorize staff to respond to the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) per the comments/concerns outlined in the letter dated March 26, 1986, from the Director of Public Works/ City Engineer to ~haron Greene, Project Manager, Orange County Transportation Commission and as amended by Greinke; and 2) Authorize staff to prepare a response, for signature by all Councilmembers, to the Orange County Transportation Commission specifically stating Council's preferences and recommendations regarding the Foothill/Eastern/I-5 Bottleneck Analysis and Toll Road Feasibility Study (i.e., opposition to double-decking of I-5/55; opposition to !expansion of La Colina; opposition to Irvine Boulevard, 17th Street, or Moulton Parkway as "super streets"; and opposition to "No Project" alternative. The motion carried 5-0. 100 Mayor Greinke suggested that Council seriously consider in budget sessions the addition of a full-time transportation/traffic expert on a two-year program to assist staff in matters that will be forthcoming. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer added that the final report is due in June/july, 1986. 6. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - MYFORD ROAD TO JAMBOREE ROAD As recommended in the inter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Wqrks/City Engineer, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to communicate with and request each involved agency, the City of Irvine and County of Orange, to initiate subject name change proceedings within their respective jurisdictions. Carried 5-0. 96 7. PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGE - IRVINE CENTER DRIVE/MOULTON PARKWAY/ EDINGER AVENUE TO MOULTON PARKWAY Following Council discussion regarding the inter-com dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/CityEngi~ neer, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to implement a name change from Moulton Parkway to Edinger, between the Route 55 (Costa Mesa) Freeway and Harvard Avenue. The motion carried 5-0. 96 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR NEWPORT AVENUE FAU PROJECT H-M016(O02) Bids for subject project were received on March 21, 1986, as follows: Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton $188,714.00 Moore Electrical Contracting, Brea $189,800.00 DBX, Inc., Temecula $202,222.00 Baxter-Griffin Company, Inc., Stanton $730,000.00 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to award the con- tract for subject project to Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton, in the amount of $188,714, as recommended in the inter-com dated March 31, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Carried 5-0. 94 9. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF MOULTON PARKWAY AND MYFORD ROAD Bids for subject project were received on March 18, 1986, as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 4-7-86 Paxin Electric, Inc., Lancaster $ 95,212.00 Steiny and Company, Inc., Fullerton $ 98,700.00 :~' Moore Electrical Contracting, Brea $105,900.00 DBX, Inc., Temecula $123,545.00 As recommended in the inter-com dated March 31, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Salta- relli, to award the contract for subject project to Paxin Electric, Inc., Lancaster, in the amount of $95,212. Motion carried 5-0. 94 10. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO TRAILER-MOUNTED ARROW BOARDS After a brief question-and-answer period, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the purchase of two trailer- mounted arrow boards from Starlite/Blinkerlite Safety Supply Com- pany, La Mirada, in the amount of $7,146.16 for the Water Division as recommended in the inter-com dated March 29, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Motion carried 5-0. 87 11. REVISION TO AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS - EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 As recommended in the inter-com dated March 26, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the revised subject agree- ment between the City and The Irvine Company; and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. The motion carried 5-0. 45; 86-18 - 12. AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE TWO REGENERATIVE AIR STREET SWEEPERS Bids for subject item were received on March 21, 1986, as follows: Nixon Egli, Santa Fe Springs (Broom Sweeper) $ 84,147.04 ~ . Haaker Equipment, Pomona (Regenerative Air) $103,145.42 After a question-and-answer period, it was moved by Kennedy, sec- onded by Edgar, to authorize the purchase of two Elgin Crosswind sweepers from Haaker Equipment Company, Pomona, in the amount of $202,290.84, as recommended in the inter-com dated March 29, 1986, prepared by the Engineering Division. Carried 5-0, Greinke opposed. 87 13. EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR/PARALLEL NORTH-SOUTH ROAD STUDIES As recommended in the inter-com dated March 25, 1986, prepared by the Directorof Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Salta- relli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize staff to request the County of Orange to remove that segment of the north-south road between the Santa Ana Freeway and Santiago Canyon Road from the scope of work for the Eastern Transportation Corridor studies. Council concurred with Mayor Greinke's suggestion that the letter be signed by the Mayors of Orange and Tustin, and that it be addressed to Supervisors Tom Riley and Bruce Nestande. The motion carried 5-0. 100 There was some discussion regarding funding of the Joint Powers . Agency. XII. REPORTS 1. INVESMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MARCH 31, 1986 It was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated Apml 2, 1986, prepared by the Finance Direc- tor. Carried 5-0. 50 2. COSTA MESA (ROUTE 55) FREEWAY LANDSCAPING/WEED ABATEMENT It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated March 28, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Carried 5-0. 54 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 12, 4-7-86 3. FUEL STORAGE AND DISPENSING FACILITIES AGREEMENT It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file subject report dated April 1, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. After a brief question-and-answer period, the motion carried 5-0. 90 XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session for discussion of personnel matters. 2. MAGNOLIA TREE PARK - PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT In accordance with Councilman Hoestepey's request, it was dt_~e Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to appropriate $11,500 ~_~e replacement of playground equipment ;at Magnolia Tree Park. The motion carried 5-0. 77 3. SENATE BILL 2522 In response to Councilman Hoesterey'srequest that staff review SB 2522 (Senator Maddy}, the Director of Community and Administrative Services stated that staff took the liberty of stating Tustin's opposition on same. Subject bill would effective remove city zon- ing powers over establishments which sell beer and wine. 61 4, TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT PACIFIC & MAIN STREETS Councilman Edgar spoke regarding traffic along Main Street. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to install a four-way stop sign at Pacific and Main Streets. Council discussion/debate followed. The Chief of Police stated that Council should be aware of lawsuits that have occurred as a result of unwarranted stop signs being implemented in other cities. When an unwarranted stop sign/signal is installed, the liability that goes along with it most be accepted. He added that the stop signs will not eliminate traffic, but only displace it. Richard Vining, 400 West Main Street, complained about traffic on Main Street. The Chief of Police recommended a traffic signal at Pacific and Main Streets, and a four-way stop sign at Main and "B" Streets. In response to Councilman Hoesterey, the City Manager stated that staff could review the use of both Redevelopment and City funds in some proportionate share as traffic is related to the project area to pay for the traffic signal. A substitute motion was made by Hoesterey, seconded by-Greinke, to direct staff to report back at the next meeting with a recommenda- tion on funding for a traffic signal at Pacific and Main Streets, and proceed from that point. ~! ; The Director of Public Works explained that the project at S3~camore and Newport was connected to a Federal Aid Urban project and all the plans had to be processed and approved through CalTrans which took close to two years. He estimated that the project would take six months total to complete, from design to signal installation. 94 The motion carried 5-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 13, 4-7-86 5. UPDATES TO THE GENERAL PLAN Councilman Edgar requested that the Community Development Depart- ment report on the exact status of all elements to the General Plan which have recently been approved. If they are delinquent, he requested a report on when Council will have a complete, updated set of the General Plan. 56 6. SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION - SIGNAL AT RED HILL & SANTA ANA FREEMAY Mayor Pro Tam Saltarelli reported synchronization problems with the traffic signals at Red Hill and the Santa Ana Freeway in the last month. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to authorize a sup- plemental budget appropriation in the amount of $14,000 for replacement of the synchronization mechanism in the traffic signal control box at Red Hill and the Santa Ana Freeway. Carried 5-0. 94 7. KUDOS TO MAYOR FRANK H. GREINKE Mayor Pro Tam Saltarelli commended Mayor Greinke on his service on the City Council and as Mayor during the last year. 8. WELCOME TO PEGGY BLIZZARD, THE TUSTIN NEWS Mayor Greinke extended a welcome to Peggy Blizzard. She is substi- tuting for John Orr who is awaiting the birth of his first child with his wife Donna Orr, former secretary to the City Council. 9. OFFICIAL ADJOURNMENT - CATHERINE F. FRENCH i Council concurred with Councilman Hoesterey to adjourn the meeting in memory of Catherine F. French, mother of Kathy Weil, Chairperson of the Tustin Planning Commission, who passed away on April 7, 1986. 84 XIV. RECESS - :CLOSED - SESSION; OFFICIAL ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF CATHERINE F. FRENCH At 11:19 p.m. the Council recessed to a~ Closed Session for discus- sion of personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; and thence adjourned in memory of Catherine F. French to the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.; and thence to the next Regular Meeting on Monday, April 21, 1986, by unani- mous informal consent.