HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 APPROP LIMIT 96-97 07-01-96Inter-Com
DATE:
JUNE 26, 1996
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
RONALD ~. N~ULT, FINANCE DIRECTOR
APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
RECOMMENDATION:
le
Select the change in the California per Capita Personal
Income as the price factor for adjusting the 1996-97
appropriation limit.
·
Adopt Resolution 96-75 setting the appropriation limit
for Fiscal Year 1996-97 at $30,266,623.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
DISCUSSION:
Article XIIIB of the State Constitution requires Cities to annually
adopt a limit on appropriations for governmental funds.~The basis
of this limitation is the relationship between proceeds ~f tax and
total appropriations. The base year was 1978-79, and the limit is
allowed to grow based on the annual increase in population and U.S.
CPI/California per Capita Personal Income, whichever is less.
Proposition 111 was approved by voters in 1990 changing the base
year from 1978-79 to 1986-87 and amending the adjustment formulas
to make the Appropriation Limit more responsive to locai growth
issues. It also required a review of the Limit calculation as part
of the annual audit process.
Exhibit "A" shows the calculation of the Appropriation Limit for
each of the Fiscal Years 1986-87 through 1996-97. Worksheets #1-7
go through the various calculations that are required in
conformance with the League of California Cities uniform guidelines
for calculating the annual appropriations limit. Worksheet #6 goes
through the steps necessary to calculate the current limit of
$30,266,623. Worksheet #4 carries forward the proceeds of taxes
from Worksheet #2 and compares them with the current year's limit
from Worksheet #6. The result shows the City of Tustin is below
its allowable, spending limit for Fiscal 1996-97 by $10.4 million.
Ronald A. Nault
Finance Director
RAN:ts
Attachments
RAN5 :Agenda6. Jun.
!
$
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION 96-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY,COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTINt CALIFORNIAt DETERMINING A/TD ADOPTING
AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-1997
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ AND
SECTION 7910 OF THE ~OVERNMENT CODE
The City Council of The City of Tustin does hereby resolve
as follows:
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB was added to the Constitution of
the State of California at a general election held November
6v 1979; and.
WHEREAS, an annual appropriation limit must be
determined for this City effective for the fiscal year
beginning July, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the appropriation limit must be adhered to in
preparing and adopting this City's Annual Budget;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tustin
does hereby resolve and order as follows:
Section 1: In accordance with Article XIIIB of the
Constitution of the State of California, and Section 7910
of th~ Government Code, and as set forth in detail in the
Attached Exhibit "A", that the appropriation limit for.
the fiscal year beginning July, 1996 through June, 1997
is $30,266,623.
Section 2: The appropriation limit shall not. be exceeded
in the adopted budget nor by any proposed amendment to
the budget.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Tustin held on the 1st day of
July , 1996.
ATTEST:
Tracy Wills Worley, MayOr
Pamela Stoker, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814'4998
May l, 1996
P, ECEIVED
FINANCE DEPT.
PETE V~LSON. Governor
PRICE AND POPULATION DATA FOR LOCAL JtTRISDICTIONS
Appropriations Limit
Article XIII B of the California Constitution specifies that appropriations made by State and local
governments ma3' increase annually by a factor comprised of the change in population combined with
either the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local assessment roll d,:e
to local nonresidential construction.
The Department of Finance is mandated to provide the population and California per capita personal
income change data for local jurisdictions to calculate their appropriation limits. The change in the
local assessment roll due to local nonresidential construction may be obtained from your county
Assessor. The enclosures contain price and population factors for setting your 1996-97 appropriation
limit.
Enclosure I provides the change in Califomia's per capita personal income price factor. An example of
how to utilize this price factor and the population percentage change factor in calculating your 1996-97
limit is included.
EnclosUre II provides the population percentage change factors for cities and counties.
Enclosure IIA provides the' population percentage change factor for counties and for the total
incorporated population of each count3,.
These population percentage changes were prepared pursuant to Sections 2227 and 2228 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code and are calculated as of January 1, 1996. Section 2227 specifies that state
mental institutions, federal military bases and state and ''~ a-- '
~u,,a, prisons be excluded from t_he percentage
change calculations.
Population Factors for Cities and Counties
The Demographic Research Unit has adopted a new method of estimating population for the cities and
counties. This new method was used for the numbers presented here. The effect is to lower population
for the State and most jurisdictions. The new method 'was used to revise city and county numbers for
earlier years in the 1990s. The revisions are available on request.
Cities and-counties should consult Section 7901 of the Government Code for the various population
factors that may be used 'for purposes of change in population.
May 1, 1996
Page 2
PopUlation Factors for Special Districts
Special districts should consult' Section 7901 of the Government Code and Section 2228 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code for the various population factors that may be used for purposes of change
in population. .'
Article XIII B, Section 9(c) states that special districts in existence on January 1, 1978, which levied a
tax of 12½ cents or less per $100 assessed value on property within their boundaries as of the 1977-78
fiscal year are permanently exempt from establishing appropriation limits. In addition, any special
districts in existence or created thereafter whose sole funding source is from nonproceeds of taxes are
also exempt. Therefore, special districts which meet either of these two tests do not need to establish
appropriation limits.
This letter may be received by special districts, which were exempt fi-om establishing appropriation
limits by Article XIII B, Section 9(c). Receipt of this letter should not be construed as a requirement by
the Department of Finance to establish an appropriation limit.
Certification
The certification program applies to cities and counties only and does not apply to special districts.
Sections 11005.6 and 30462.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 21022 Streets and Highways
Code, and Section 38421 Vehicle Code specify that if a Department of Finance population estimate is
greater than the current certified population the Department shall automatically file a certified copy
with the Controller not less than 25 days nor more than 30 days after completion of the estimate. The
Department will certify the higher estimate unless a ,a~:itten request not to certify is received by the
Department from the city or county within 25 days of the completion of the estimate. A city or county
requesting that their higher estimate not be certified will remain at the current certified population.
The Department of Finance will not certify a population estimate that is lOwer than the current certified
population unless requested to do so by a city or a county. The request for certification must be
received by the Department on or before June 1, 1996.
Further Information
Questions concerning population should be directed to the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 322-4651.
Director
Enclosures
ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONS* JANUARY l,
TO JANUARY l, 1996 AND TOTAL POPULATION JANUARY l, 1996.
1995
ENCLOSURE II
DATE PRINTED
O4/3O/96
COUNTY
CITY
POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONS
ANNUAL
PERCENT CHANGE
1995 TO ]996
POPULATION
7-1-95
1-1-96-
TOTAL
POPULAT I ON
1-1-96
ORANGE
ANAHEIM
BREA
BUENA PARK
COSTA MESA
CYPRESS
DANA POINT
FOUNTAIN VALLEY
FULLERTON
GARDEN GROVE
HUNTINGTON BEACH
IRVINE
LAGUNA BEACH
LAGUNA HILLS
LAGUNA NIGUEL
LA HABRA
LAKE FOREST
LA PALMA
LOS ALAMITOS
MISSION VIEJO
NEWPORT BEACH
ORANGE
PLACENTIA
SAN CLEMENTE
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
SANTA ANA
SEAL' BEACH
STANTON
]~TUSTIN
VILLA PARK
WESTMINSTER
YORBA LINDA
UNINCORPORATED
ORANGE COUNTY
0.59
O.BO
O.11
O.11
0.50
0.85
o.13
0.35
0.09
0.32
4.45
0.89
0.32
1.43
0.25
0.10
-o.o6
o.75
1.79
0.22
7.39
0.96
7.38
1.11
-o.17
o.o9
0.07
3.73
0.46
0.So
0.96
5.40
291,536
34,527
72,617
46,167
35,679
54,239
121,63o
151,247
186,587
12o,474
23,581
24,940
54,778
53,980
57,571
15,513
]],422
88,323
68,920
]18,105
44,575
45,972
28,629
306,327
25,646
31,861
56,821
6,336
81,879
57,084
165,624
293,245
34,802
72,700
101,269
46,397
35,984
54,311
122,059
151,376
187,18o
125,836
23,790
25,021
55,561
54,117
57,631
15,5o4
11,508
89,906
69,069
119,742
45,003
46,607
28,948
3o5,8oo
25,668
31,882
58,940
6,365
82,536
57,632
174.,570
'293,245
34,802
72,700
102,084
46,397
35,984
54,311
122,059
151,376
187,18o
127,22o
23,790
25,021
55,567
54,117
57,631
15,5o4
12,307
89,906
69,069
]19,742
45,003
46,607
28,948
305,800
26,366
31,882
63,619
6,365
82,536
57,632
179,571
1.05 2,583,745 2,6]0,959 2,624,335
EXCLUSIONS INCLUDE STATE MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, FEDERAL MILITARY BASES AND STATE
AND FEDERAL PRISONS.
PAGE 1
S'rATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-3706
May 13, 1996
PETE VVILSON, Governor
RECEIVED,
qNANP.,IE DEPT,
REVISED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT DATA FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
This letter is to inform you that the Department of Finance has corrected the Price Factor,
that is, the percentage change in per capita personal income, to be used in setting the
1996 - 1997 appropriation limit.
The revised Price Factor is lower than the Price Factor given in Enclosure I of the letter,
Price and Population Data for Local Jurisdictions sent to you on May 1, 1996.
The old Price Factor was 5.21 percent. The new Price Factor is 4.67 percent.
We have revised Enclosure I to reflect the new Price Factor and to show how the new price
factor and population factor are used in computing an appropriations limit.
We apologize for an), inconvenience this revision causes. But we do ask that you notify any
affected offices within your jurisdiction of this revision.
If you have any questions, please call us at (916) 323-4086.
Sincerely,
Linda Ga~e,o Chief
Demographic Research Unit
91 $ L Street, 8th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
May 13, 1996
Revised
Enclosure I
Ao
Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost-of-living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their
governing body. Local jurisdictions may select either the percentage change in
California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local
assessment roll due to the addition of local nonresidential new construction. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage changes
to be used in setting the 1996-97 appropriation limit are:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal
Year (FY)
Percentage change
over prior year
1996-97 4.67
Bo
Following is an example using sample population changes and the changes in.
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 1996-97
appropriations limit.*
1996-97:
Per Capita Change = 4.67 percent
· Population Change = 1.58 percent
Per Capita converted to a ratio:
4.67 + 100 = 1.0467
100
Population converted to a ratio:
1.58+100 =1.0158
100
Calculation of factor for FY 96-97: 1.0467 x 1.0158 = 1.0632
* Conversion of the factor to a ratio eliminates minus numbers.
(D
0~000000~0
000000000
·
0
-~-
0
· 0
0
81 -
0
..,1~
c:'~ o
.o mC)
0 0 lZ')
~.§§oooo
§o, o~ 8o~
0
0
0
0
0 O~ O0 O0 0 0.0
0 0~ O0 O0 0 O0
0 O0 O0 O0 0 O0
0 00000000000 00000.
00000~00000~00000
~0000 0000~
0
0
0
0
I'-,
o 8
O0
0
0
0 0
O0 000
O0 0~0
00 0 0
00) 0
00~
0000
0
x
I-
uJ o
o§
~! o o o o:
'lC)' 0 ~ 0 0 (
m
~o
0 0 0
o q
~o
~ o o
~ o o
~ o o o
~oo
oe~oo
=§
0
0
o olio
~ ~j~.
o ~llO
~0
00~
0
~ ..0
0mo
0
0
0
00
0
0 0 0 0
E' E E
O3 0
0 ~