Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1986 02 03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 3, 1986 I, CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION ; The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tom Saltarelli, and the Invocation was given by ~ Councilwoman Kennedy. ~ II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Frank H, Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoestorey Ursula E. Kennedy Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Fred Wakefield, Police Captain Susan Jones, Recreation Superintendent Approximately 30 in the audience II,I~ PROCLAMATIONS !. RUBY MAY - VOLUNTEER SERVICE IN SENIOR PROGRAMS Mayor Greinke presented a proclamation to Ruby May in recognition of her volunteer services in senior programs for the past ten years. Mrs. May thanked the Council. 84 ' 2. ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TUSTIN - RED GARTER REVUE The Mayor read a proclamation commending the Assistance League of Tustin for dedicated service and contributions to the community, and extending best wishes on their 1986 Red Garter Revue production to be held at Chapman College on March 13-15. Marge Lightfoot, President, thanked the Council. 84 3. FRIENDS OF THE TUSTIN LIBRARY - TWENTIETH ANNIVERSARY Mayor Greinke read a proclamation congratulating the Friends of the Tustin Library on their twentieth anniversary in community ser- vice. President Jean Kemp accepted the proclamation and thanked ! the Council. 84 IV. COMMUNITY NOTES 1. TUSTIN ROTARY CLUB SWEETHEARTS LUNCHEON The Mayor announced that the Tustin Rotary Club Sweethearts Lunch- eon will be held on Wednesday, February 12 at noon, ~ 2. HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANES - ROUTE 55 A public sub-committee meeting will be held on February 4 from 9:00-10:30 a.m. of the Route 55 Advisory Committee which deals with the HOV lanes. 3- TUSTIN CROSSING GUARDS Mayor Greinke referenced a letter from Beverly Langley congratu- · lating Tustin on the excellent job done by its crossing guards. He . requested staff acknowledge Ms. Langley's letter. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 2-3-86 4. TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER FUND, INC. - SEED MONEY REQUEST Councilwoman Kennedy reported that Margarete Thompson, Co-Chair for fund-raising for the Tustin Area Senior Center, has formally requested seed money for commencement of fund-raising efforts. As recommended in the inter-com dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the Director of Community and Administrative Services, it was moved by Greinke, seconded by Hoestere~, to approve $10,000 seed money for the Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. Motion carried 5-0. 41 5. BOARD OF DIRECTORS - TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER FUND, INC. Councilwoman Kennedy reported that Ken Hoesterey has had to step down from the Board of Directors, Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. The Board voted last week to recommend to Council that Janet Schwartz be appointed to fill subject vacancy. It was then moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to appoint Janet Schwartz to the Board of Directors, Tustin Area Senior Center Fund, Inc. Carried 5-0. 41 Mayor Greinke requested that Council give proper recognition to Ken Hoesterey at its next Council meeting for his work on subject board. 6. INTERNATIONAL BOWLERS CONGRESS IN TUSTIN Mayor Greinke announced that the Orange County Women's Bowling Association will be hosting the International Bowlers Congress from April 3 - July 1. Tustin Lanes will be one of the host facili- ties. With Council's concurrence, Mayor Greinke forwardedl corre- spondence on the matter to staff for appropriate handling and response. V. PUBLIC HEARING 1. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 85-8; PROHIBITION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS - ORDINANCE NO, 954 {Continued from Janbary 20, 1986} The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated February 3 pre- pared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened at 7:17 p.m. by Mayor Greinke, Frank Greinke, Jr., 1011 E1 Camino Real, spoke as a representative of Southern Counties Oil and Director of the Chamber of Commerce. He requested continuance of the matter until "toxic waste transfer station" and its effects on existing businesses within our commu- nity are defined. The Legislative Committee of the Chamber of Com- merce has invited a member of the Orange County Fire Department ~nd City staff to attend its February 5 meeting on the matter. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the publi~ hearing was closed at 7:19 p.m. The Community Development Director responded to Councilwoman Kennedy that Ordinance No. 954 specifically prohibits toxi.c waste transfer stations. The ordinance also provides a definition of a toxic waste transfer station which is almost exactly out of State law. Mr. Greinke has concerns that service stations dealing with bulk reclaimed oil may be interpreted to be toxic waste transfer stations. Staff does not interpret it that way but perhaps some- body else may. Another possibility would be to totally ~.redefine toxic waste transfer station and specifically exclude service sta- tions. Following Council/staff discussion, it was moved by Hoestere~, sec- onded by Edgar, to continue consideration of Ordinance No. 954 for 60 days as follows: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 2-3-86 :: ORDINANCE NO. 954 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 85-8 PROHIBITING THE DEVELOPMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF TOXIC WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS WITH- IN THE CITY LIMITS Council discussion followed with comments as follows: 1) Expand the ordinance so it is not a disservice to the average resident, but something that can be effective for those doing massive kinds of toxic waste transferring; 2) Provide more specific definitions in the ordinance; 3) Request the City Attorney's office to review the possibility of including certain findings in the ordinance relative to the size of Tustin as a city, the lack of production of toxic waste in Tustin, and the poor traffic circulation which makes it hazardous to be on the roads at certain times; and 4) Include an exemption clause for those businesses who may inadvertently be categorized as a toxic waste station. The motion carried 5-0. 102 PUBLIC INPUT 1, FRONTIER PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT David McMahon, 14092 Woodlawn Avenue, requested replacement of the toddler swing at Frontier Park. He complained that transients are ~ sleeping in the park, and also stated that the park needs atten- tion. He suggested that a staff person be assigned to perform a few hours' maintenance on a daily basis. The City Manager indicated staff would investigate the matter. 77 '~2~ WEED ABATEMENT ALONG ROUTE 55 FREEWAY James L, Mayer, 17271 Amaganset Way, complained that weeds on the Route 55 Freeway between Fourth and Seventeenth Streets pose a fire hazard. The Director of Public Works reported that CalTrans has deferred any landscaping on subject freeway until completion of the inter- change. Mayor Greinke stated that staff would strongly pursue with CalTrans the matter of weed abatement and the status of the land- scaping program, and provide Mr. Mayer with a copy of correspon- dence on same. 54 VII. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. There was a brief question-and-answer period regarding Item No. 12 and Item No. 13. The motion carried 5-0. : APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JANUARY 20, 1986, REGULAR MEETING , ! 2, APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $964,539.82 ':" RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $142,646.95 50 RESOLUTION NO, 86-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT VANDERLIP AVENUE) Adopted Resolution No. 86-18; and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed 30 days after recordation, authorized payment of final 10% of retention amount as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 107 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 2-3-86 4. RESOLUTION NO. 86-16 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK - PHASE I) Adopted Resolution No. 86-16; and assuming no claims or stop payment notices are filed within 30 days after recordation, authorized payment of final 5% retention amount as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 77 5. CALTRANS SERVICE AGREEMENT #07-C458, NEWPORT AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT PROJECT Approved subject agreement and authorized the Mayor to execute same as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engi- 45 neer. 86-5 6. RESOLUTION NO. 86-15 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COLUMBUS TUSTIN ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION PROJECT AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS Adopted Resolution No. 86-15 as recommended by the Community Services Department. 77 7. AGREEMENT FOR REGIONAL MASTER PLAN FOR FLOOD CONTROL & STORM DRAIN- AGE Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject agree- ment between the City, the City of Irvine, and The Irvine Com- pany subject to final approval of the City Attorney's office; and authorized a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $5,000 for Tustin's total share of the first year cost as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engi- 45 neer. 86-6 8. PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS, HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD) Approved the contract between the County of Orange (No, C40200) and the City; and authorized its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk as recommended by the Community Development Depart- ment. 45 86-7 9. PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTIES Approved the contract between the County of Orange {No. C40272} and the City; and authorized its execution by the Mayor and City Clerk as recommended by the Community Development Depart- ment. 45 86-8 10. RESOLUTION NO. 86-13 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 8451 {South of Dow Avenue, West of Tustin Boundary, North of Moulton Parkway} Adopted Resolution No. 86-13 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 11. RESOLUTION NO. 86-19 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 SLURRY SEAL PRO- GRAM) Adopted Resolution No. 86-19; and assuming no claims -dr stop payment notices are filed 30 days after date of recordation, authorized payment of the final 10% retention amount as!'recom- mended by the Engineering Division. 95 12. TUSTIN LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - STREET LIGHTING AGREEMENTS Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Street Lighting Service Utility-Owned System Schedule No. LS-1; the Street Lighting Service Customer-Owned System Schedule No.'s LS-2, LS-3 and Option Schedule No. LS-4, subject to the City Attorney's final approval, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 45 86-9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 2-3-86 13. SANTA ANA FREEWAY (I-5)/COSTA tiESA FREEWAY (RTE. 55) INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION Authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject agree- ment between the City and State of California Department of Transportation as recommended by the Director of Public Works/ City Engineer. 45 86-10 VIII. ORDIItatNCES FOR INTRODUCTION 1, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE ORDINANCE & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - ORDINANCE NO. 964 Following consideration of the inter-com dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by · Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to continue the Hazardous Mate- rials Disclosure Ordinance and Implementation Plan for 60 days. The City Manager interjected that this item is different from Zon- ing Ordinance No. 85-8 to prohibit toxic waste transfer stations (Public Hearing No. 1, Ordinance No. 954). The Community Development Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. The motion for continuance was withdrawn by the maker and the second. It was then moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordi- nance No. 964 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Mayor Greinke felt it important that the City know which businesses will be impacted by subject item and implement a notification pro- gram on same. He suggested the business license process as a means of accomplishing this, The Community Development Director responded that State law must be implemented rather quickly. At this time staff does not know exactly how many businesses will be impacted. He stated staff could prepare a press release or have an article in the Chamber's newsletter published. Jim Radley, Assistant Chief, Orange County Fire Department, stated that the County will mail a packet of information to businesses ~ they think may be affected by the ordinance. At present, there is , limited information available. Press releases will be made when implementation of the program begins. Chief Radley provided a timetable for same. He responded to Council questions. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance :~- No. 964 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO, 964 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 5600 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE DISCLOSURE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS "~ The motion carried 5-0. 102 IX,! ! ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION None. X. OLD BUSINESS 1. PARKING RESTRICTIONS DURING HOURS OF STREET SWEEPING The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer as contained in his inter-com dated January 22, 1986. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 2-3-86 The Director responded to Councilwoman Kennedy that subject.~policy would apply only to new requests for installation of signs or requests for removal of existing signs. Council discussion followed. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the current practice of regulating parking during hours of street sweeping with the addition of the following six policies that would regulate that practice as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer: ! ' ~ a) All restrictions should be placed on a block-by-block basis only for most residential developments, except where a develop- ment is located on a large parcel of land with one ownership such as an apartment complex or a homeowners' association. b) The resident(s) initiating said request should be required to submit a petition signed by a minimum of 2/3 of the total num- ber of residents on any given block that are in favor of the requested on-street parking restrictions. c) Only one signature per dwelling unit should be utilized for attaining the 2/3 count. d) Staff would review the request and/or petition and implement the action if the 2/3 signature requirement was met. Otherwise, if the signature requirement was not met, staff would deny the request. e) Appeals by the requesting party could be made to the City Council. f) Requests for sign removals would require a petition signed by a minimum of 2/3 the total number of residents on any given block. The motion carried 5-0. 75 XI. NEW BUSINESS 1. BID AWARD - PURCHASE & INSTALLATION, POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICA- TIONS CENTER UPGRADE As recommended in the inter-com dated January 29, 1986, prepared by the Chief of Police, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded Hoestepey, to: 1} Award contract for subject bid to Modular Communications Systems, North Hollywood, in the amount of $99,772; and 2} Approve $20,000 as contingency sum to cover any incidental modifications, additions, unforeseen difficulties, etc., not directly or specifically addressed in bid request. Carried 5-0. 82 2. REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM ORANGE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AGENCY (C.T.S.A.) Following consideration of the inter-com dated January 27; 1986;~ prepared by the Director of Community and Administrative Services, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to approve the request for financial assistance from Orange County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA} in the amount of $1,958r Mayor Greinke requested that in the future, staff reports spell out what an acronym stands for. Councilmembers spoke in support of the Orange County CTSA. The motion carried 5-0. 41 45; 86-11 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 2-3-86 3. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP - RESOLUTION NO. 86-17 Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated January 22, 1986, prepared by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, it was moved by Saltarelli seconded by Hoestere~, to: 1) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 86-17 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE SOUTH- ERN CALIFORNIA WATER COMMITTEE, INC. 2) Authorize a supplemental Water Service budget appropriation in the amount of $750 for said membership. Carried 5-0. 107 4~ RENTAL FEES FOR 1986 POLLING PLACES (WALK-ON ITEM) Following consideration of the inter-com dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the City Clerk, it was moved Hoestere~, to authorize $35.00 as the rental fee for polling places for the April 8, 1986, General Municipal Election. The motion car- , ried 5-0. 48 REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JANUARY 27, 1986 It was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, to ratify the entire Planning Commission Action Agenda of January 27, 1986. Carried 5-0. 80 2~ STATUS REPORT CONCERNING ABANDONED RAILROAD SPUR TRACKS FROM THE INTERSTATE 5 FREEWAY TO MOULTON PARKWAY The staff report was presented by the Community Development Direc- tor as contained in the inter-com dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke suggested staff contact Chick Willette, Director of The Irvine Company's Builder and Land Sales Division, for further information on the matter. Councilwoman Kennedy suggested a town hall meeting with residents of the Laurelwood, Peppertree, and Tustin Meadows subdivisions, ' with representatives from the Tusti n Unified School District, The Irvine Company, and City staff to start expressing concerns and try to find a solution rather than to take no action. Mayor Greinke reiterated his suggestion to contact Mr. Willette. If that proves futile, then Council could proceed with a town hall meeting. Councilman Hoesterey reported on the area between Walnut and the railroad tracks. If residents are able to get 100% participation along Alder in the Peppertree subdivision, The Irvine Company would sell that property to the residents. A couple of those residents are polling all residents on Alder to see if they will participate. / Another problem is that the drainage ditch through that area must have some type of easement or storm drain for flood control. A jet fuel line also runs through there which means there is a perpetual right of easement. If the Alder residents do acquire the property, · ~i they must still grant an easement to prevent encroachment for any future repairs or replacement of that line. On the Laurelwood side, he remembered that there was a proposal a few years ago for a bicycle trail, at which time the homeowner's association took exception. He suggested that the City poll those CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 2-3-86 residents again to see if they would want some type of bike lane or passsageway which would take school children off of Redhill and provide a safe route of travel. Councilwoman Kennedy noted that Tustin Meadows abuts the other side of that right-of-way. She felt the matter should-not be dealt with on a piecemeal basis as more than one association is directly involved. She again stated the need for a meeting with at least homeowner association directors to inform them of what is going on. Councilman Hoesterey agreed that they should be notified that something must be done with that parcel, However, he felt that prior to holding a townhall meeting, the City should know what the options are to provide direction for discussions, and perhaps poll each of the affected bodies prior to such a meeting. The Director of Public Works focused attention on an additional parcel other than the railroad within that strip which the City owns in fee for the drainage facility. It is immediately adjacent to Tustin Meadows. He stated that if residents from the La~elwood and Peppertree tracts were to acquire the entire 60-foot parcel, they would only be able to utilize 45 feet of it at this time, until that open channel were enclosed with conduit or pipe and covered over. The report dated February 3, 1986, prepared by the Community Devel- opment Department was received and filed by unanimous informal consent. XIII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager and City Attorney requested a Closed Session for legal matters to review the progress in preparation of lawsuits involving the City of Irvine. 2. BUDGET PLANNING WORKSHOP - MARCH 10, 1986 As recommended by the City Manager, Council concurred to schedule a budget planning workshop for March 10, 1986, at 7:00 p,m, for mid- year budget review combined with pre-1986/87 budget planning, The City Manager informed Councilman Edgar that both the fiscal year-end financial statement and formalized budget data will be finalized before the workshop. 29 3. EMERGENCY CALLBOXES FOR ORANGE COUNTY - RESOLUTION NO. 86-20 Councilman Edgar brought up the issue of recent legislation to pro- vide reliable funding for installation, maintenance, and operation of an Orange County emergency callbox system. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 86-20 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF lUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES Council debate followed regarding installation, maintenance costs, and related fees for a hard-wire callbox system versus motorists utilizing the 911 emergency system on cellular phones. The Director of Public Works referenced a letter dated January 23, 1986, from the Orange County Transportation Commission which was not received until January 29 on subject matter. He stated Council could defer action on the matter to study the materials further. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli spoke in favor of Resolution No. 86-20. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 2-3-86 A substitute motion was made by Hoesterey, seconded by Greinke, to continue the matter to February 18 for further staff review and recommendation. The substitute motion died 2-3, Edgar, Kennedy, and Saltarelli opposed. The original motion carried 3-2, Greinke and Hoesterey opposed. 54 4. JOINT POWERS AGENCY - FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR Councilman Edgar led discussion regarding Tustin's participation in the Joint Powers Agency. It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Tustin join the Joint Powers Agency effective February 26, 1986, so as to have voting ability at the next meeting of the Joint Powers Agency on February 27, 1986. The City Manager interjected that such action would require a I four-fifths vote of the Council to adopt an urgency ordinance to amend the effective date of the Major Thoroughfare & Bridge Fee Program. After further discussion, the motion was amended by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to agendize for the February 18 meeting the matter of Tustin joining the Joint Powers Agency with an effective date of · ~ Februaryi26~ The motion carried 5-0. 100 5. KUDOS TO POLICE DEPARTMENT Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli commended the Police Department on its apprehension of an escapee from Orange County Jail, 82 6o MAIN STREET ZONE STUDY In response to Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli, the Community Development Director reported that staff will hopefully have a report on the February 18 agenda. A series of three zoning options will be presented. If Council decides that a zone change is in order, it would then be referred to the Planning Commission, and Main Street residents would be notified of same. Mayor Greinke stated that more than Main Street residents are involved. He reported that there is a great deal of resistance from residents in the community. There was consensus that the issue come before Council in the very near future. 109 7. JOINT MEETING WITH SANTA ANA CITY OFFICIALS The City Manager responded to Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli that he would check into responding to recent correspondence from Santa Ana Mayor Griset inviting a Council committee to view their development plans. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli stated that Tustin should recipro- cate and invite Santa Ana Officials to view Tustin's development plans. 38 8, EXTENSION OF NEWPORT AVENUE TO EDINGER AVENUE Council concurred with Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli's request that staff agendize the possibility of extending Newport Avenue to Edinger Avenue, with a report from the City Attorney on possible litigation against the Public Utilities Commission for their resis- tance to same. 95 9. "AN EVENING OF DANCE" Mayor Greinke announced "An Evening of Dance" on February 15 at 8:00 p.m. at Tustin High School. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 2-3-86 10. CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES BETWEEN TUSTIN AND IRVINE Mayor Greinke shared with the audience that the Tustin City Council is diligently continuing to meet with City of Irvine officials in an effort to work out mutual problems. 11. RENAMING OF MOULTON PARKWAY TO IRVINE CENTER DRIVE OR EDINGER STREET Council concurred with Councilman Hoesterey that staff agen"dize the possibility of changing the name of Moulton Parkway to either Irvine Center Drive or Edinger Street. 96 XIV. RECESS - REDEVELOPFIENT; CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURNMENT At 8:35 p.m. the meeting was recessed to the Redevelopment Agency; and thence to a Closed Session to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation involving the City of Irvine pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c); and thence adjourned to the next Adjourned Regular Meeting on Tuesday, February 18, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. by unani- mous informal consent. MAYOR 'cLERK T