Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1985 07 01 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JULY 1, 1985 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli r-' led the Pledge of Allegiance, and the Invocation was given by Council- man Hoesterey. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: FrankH. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Eva A. Nava, Deputy City Clerk Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Dale Wick, Assistant City Engineer Royleen A. White, Di r. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Jeff Kolin, Recreation Superintendent Eileen Harter, Recreation Supervisor Suzanne Atkins, Deputy City Attorney Approximately 30 in the audience III. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & PROCLAMATIONS 1, FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION Mayor Greinke extended a hearty invitation to all to attend the free sixth annual Fourth of July Fireworks Spectacular at Tustin High School, with entertainment beginning at 6:00 p.m. 2o AWARD TO COPES, INC., OF PROCEEDS FROM EL CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK-OFF On behalf of the Tustin City CoUncil, Jeff Kolin, Recreation Super- intendent, presented a check in the amount of $4,177.98 to COPES, Inc., which was accepted by Executive Director Marilyn Morgan, President of the Board Gerald Klein, Dottie Hill, and Bob Hill. Mr. Klein offered recognition and gratitude to the Tustin City Council, the E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cook-off-Steering Committee, the Cook-off sponsors, and the community for the dona- tion. He presented the Recreation Superintendent with a plaque. The Recreation Superintendent introduced Eileen M. Harter, Recrea- tion Supervisor, who was responsible for coordination of the Cook- off. Mrs. Harter was commended by the Council for her work. 41 3. NATIONAL "SAFEGUARD & IMPROVE YOUR ENVIRONMENT" DAY Mayor Greinke read and presented a proclamation accepted by Judy Tanner, Kathy Viney, Kristin Follis, and Caige Moore for their participation in the National "Safeguard and Improve Your Environ- ment Day" at Tustin Centennial Park on June 23, 1985. 84 4. JEFF KOLIN, RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT RESIGNATION FROM CITY SERVICE A proclamation was read and presented by Mayor Greinke to Jeff Kolin in commendation and appreciation of meritorious and outstand- ing service during his tenure with the City. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 7-1-85 Mr. Kolin expressed his thanks to the Council, City staff, and the Tustin community for their cooperation and support. 84 5. CONGRATULATIONS TO "THE TUSTIN NEWS" EDITOR Mayor Greinke noted that John Orr has recently been promoted to Editor of "The Tustin News," and offered his congratulations to Mr. Orr on his new position. 84 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT AT 155 MAIN STREET - RESOLUTION NO. 85-48 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July. l, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. A brief question-and-answer period followed. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:15 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded:by Kennedy, to: 1) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NU. 85-48 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN CONDITIONS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 155 MAIN STREET (AP # 401-585-01) CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND HEREBY ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISANCE 2) Authorize staff to file a misdemeanor complaint against the business and property owner as deemed appropriate by the City Attorney, should compliance not be obtained by August 1, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 81 2. EXTENSION OF MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT ALONG FIRST STREET - URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 936 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. There were no speakers, and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 936 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 936 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 936 be introduced. Councilman Saltarelli expressed opposition to the ordinance. The motion carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. Xt was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 936 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 936 by the City Clerk, it was moved b Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordi- nance No. 936 be passed any adopted as ~o~lows: ORDINANCE NO. 936 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES ON FIRST STREET WESTERLY OF NEWPORT AVENUE Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, HoeSterey, Kennedy NOES: Saltarelli ABSENT: None 81 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 7-1-85 3. SPECIFIC PLAN AREA NO. 7 - URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 937 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:21 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed. : It was moved by Hoestere~, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. : 937 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 937 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 937 be introduced. Motion carried 5-0. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere~, that Ordinance No. 937 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 937 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 937 be passed and adopted as follows: ORDINANCE ND. 937 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSALS OF A SPECIFIC PLAN Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 4. APPEAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 85-13 - MOBIL OIL STATION AT 13872 RED HILL AVENUE AT LAGUNA ROAD (EL CAMINO REAL) The staff report was presented by the Community Development Direc- tor as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, lg85, and stated that since waiver of the required irrevocable offer of dedication is subject to Council policy, the recommended action is pleasure of the Council. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. The Community Development Director recommended that the matter be continued to July 15, 1985, to allow the applicant/appellant an opportunity to speak on the matter. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to continue the open public hearing and appeal of Use Permit No. 85-13 to July 15, 1985. Carried 5-0. 81 5. LAND USE REGULATIONS GOVERNING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ND. 85-1 - RESOLUTION ND. 85-65 B. ZONE CHANGE 85-5 - ORDINANCE NO. 934 C. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 - ORDINANCE NO. 935 The staff report and recommendation for the three actions pertain- ing to Yorba Street land use regulations were presented by the Com- munity Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985. Following a question-and-answer period, the public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:33 p.m. Dr. Martin D. Schwartz, property owner at 175 Yorba Street, spoke in favor of the proposed actions and commended the City Council for its progressive approach to guiding the future development in the City to achieve the most pleasing eventual product for the resi- dents while accommodating the continued economic growth of the area. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 7-1-85 The Community Development Director reiterated the public hearing notice procedure at Councilwoman Kennedy's request. Councilman Edgar spoke in favor of the proposed actions. A. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 85-1 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-65 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85-1, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO After further Council discussion regarding the widening of Yorba Street to its ultimate width, the motion carried 5-0. 56 B. ZONE CHANGE 85-5 - ORDINANCE NO. 934 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 934 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 934 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 934 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 934 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 85-5 REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTIES LOCATED ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Motion carried 5-0. i 110 C. SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 - ORDINANCE NO. 935 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 935 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 935 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 935 be introduced as tollows: ORDIIta, NCE NO. 935 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 9 REGULATING DEVELOPMENT INCLUD- ING CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON YORBA STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BLVD. AS INDICATED ON EXHIBIT ATTACHED HERETO Carried 5-0. 81 It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to direct staff to report back on the feasibility of the immediate widening of Yorba Street, including the concept of undergrounding utilities, and that staff communicate with existing property owners regarding dedication of right-of-way to minimize development costs. The motion carried 5-0. 81 6. CONSIDERATION OF EAST TUSTIN PHASE I RESIDENTIAL A. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 84-3 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 B. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-4 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-67 C. ZONE CItANGE NO. 85-4 - ORDINANCE NO. 938 The staff report and recommendations were summarized by the Com- munity Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department pertaining to consideration of the East Tustin Phase I Residential Development. The Director indicated that representatives of The Irvine Company were in attendance to make a presentation and respond to Council questions. Mayor Greinke opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. The following persons spoke on the matter: CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 7-1-85 Brad Olson, President of The Irvine Community Development Company, a subsidiary of The Irvine Company, provided chronological history on the East Tustin development plans to date. Steve Ross, Manager of Urban Planning & Design, narrated a five- minute slide presentation on the evolution of the Phase I residen- tial community concept plan before Council this evening. Mr. Olson provided closing comments, addressing issues of density, parking, flood control, and public schools. Stephen D. Johnson, representing the North Tustin Municipal Advi- sory Council (formerly the Santiago Municipal Advisory Council), asked Council to reject the EIR, stating more engineering studies are needed to determine the impact on the County area within Tustin's sphere of influence, including the shared school system (Tustin Unified School DistriCt). Carol Taylor, 13532 Farmington Road, spoke in rebuttal to Mr. Johnson's comments, noting that there has been a great deal of new development in the County area, whose residents also use Tustin roads, and the County has done nothing to help resolve traffic problems. In response to Mrs. Taylor, Mr. Olson defined the difference between a townhome and condominium is the legal distinction as to form of ownership. A townhome involves fee ownership of the land, and a condominium involves ownership of airspace and land ownership belongs to the association. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. A. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 84-3 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 Mayor Pro Tom Saltarelli commended the staff and Planning Commis- sion for their excellent work and spoke in favor of the Phase I residential plan. It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-66 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 84-3 AND AMENDMENTS, AS FINAL EIR 84-3 Councilman Edgar also spoke in favor of EIR 84-3. Mayor Greinke commended the Planning Commission on their exceptional work rela- tive to receiving extensive public input during the public hearings on the matter. Councilwoman Kennedy echoed Mayor Greinke's commen- dations. In response to Councilwoman Kennedy, James McDonald from the consultant firm of Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, described flood control mitigation measures to be implemented along Browning Avenue between San Juan and E1 Camino Real. Council dis- cussion followed. Terry Austin from the consultant firm of Austin, Foust & Asso- ciates, responded to Councilwoman Kennedy's concerns on traffic. He stated there will be improvements made to Bryan and Browning Avenues as part of the Phase I residential project. The major mitigation will come from the Jamboree Road interchange, which will not only serve traffic from this project, but will take existing traffic off of City streets, i.e, Redhill Avenue. Councilwoman Kennedy stated she was not entirely satisfied, that she understood the numbers support what is recommended, and that the solution (Jamboree Road interchange) has not yet been built even though it is funded and programmed, which makes the recommendation difficult for her to accept. Councilman Hoestorey expressed offense at Mr. Johnson's comments and spoke in support of the project. He added that Council will be looking for lower development densities in the East Tustin area to the north. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6, 7-1-85 Councilman Edgar spoke in support of EIR 84-3. Mayor Greinke spoke relative to negotiations with the Tustin Uni- fied School District and the spirit of cooperation being maintained to continue the good working relationship the City and School Dis- trict have enjoyed. The motion to adopt Resolution No. 85-66 carried 5-0. 81 B.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 84-4 - RESOLUTION NO. 85-67 It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO, 85-67 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE TUSTIN AREA GENERAL PLAN FOR AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, BRYAN AVENUE, BROWNING AVENUE, AND PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" Carried 5-0. 56 C,ZONE CHANGE NO, 85-4 - ORDINANCE NO, 938 It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 938 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Follow- ing first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 938 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Noesterey, that Ordinance No. 938 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO, 938 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, REZONING AN AREA BOUNDED BY THE I-5 FREEWAY, BRYAN AVENUE, BROWNING AVENUE, AND THE PROPOSED JAMBOREE ROAD, FROM PLANNED COM- MUNITY TO PLANNED COMMUNITY/RESIDENTIAL AND PUBLIC AND INSTITU- TIONAL AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "A" AND INCLUDING THE INCORPORATION OF PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS KNOWN AS THE EAST TUSTIN PHASE I RESIDENTIAL Mayor Greinke voiced great concern that there is insufficient off- street parking (driveways) for the three and four-bedroom units. Mr. Olson responded that The Irvine Company does not intend to have any four-bedroom apartment units, and same was included at the request of the Planning Commission to assure that if any were built the parking requirement would be greater. Mr. Olson responded to further Council questions. Councilwoman Kennedy raised concerns over the parking system in the Phase I residential community that will have no driveways - only blacktop alleyways, curbing, landscaping, and the front door; and if garages are used for storage, residents will have no place to park. There is nothing to prevent The Irvine Company from selling the apartments in the future, and she sees all problems developing in the next ten years will belong to the City. She added that she is bothered by the "postage stamp" parks designed to meet the City's minimum parkland requirement of 3 acres per 1,000. She com- mented that the density is great because Phase I is not designed in conformance with the rest of the City with sidewalks, front lawns, public streets, and the requirements are inconsistent in each phase. She expressed alarm with the 40 foot height maximum, when the City has experienced problems with such developments. The amendment to the motion by Kennedy to modify Ordinance No. 938 to require a use permit procedure to provide Council the opportu- nity to thoroughly review Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III died for lack of a second. The Community Development Director explained the Planned~Community zone regulations versus Use Permit regulations which are discre- tionary and provide the Planning Commissi on, and City Council under appeal, the ability to approve or disapprove the land use. Councilwoman Kennedy appealed to the Council to reconsider her request for Use Permit regulations. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7, 7-1-85 In response to Mayor Greinke, the Community Development Director stated that the only real difference between private and public streets is that the narrower private streets lack available park- ing, with the positive factor being that maintenance jurisdiction rests with a homeowners' association and not with the City. The Community Development Director responded to Councilmembers' concern that Condition No. 4 of Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 (Public Hearing No. 7) addresses the adequate right-of-way and the resultant equivalent decrease in density. The motion to introduce Ordinance No. 939 carried 4-1, Kennedy opposed. 110 RECESS RECONVENED Mayor Greinke recessed the meeting at 9:26 p.m. The meeting was recon- vened at 9:30 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. 7. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12345 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated July 1, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 9:31 p.m. There were no speakers on the matter. It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to continue the open public hearing on Tentative Tract Map No. 12345 to July 15, 1985. The motion carried 5-0. 99 8. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - CITY COUNCIL & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LAFAYETTE PLAZA - DISPOSITION & DEVELOPNENT AGREEMENT The City Manager/Executive Director presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in his inter-com dated July 1, 1985, and responded to Council/Agency questions. Mayor/Chairman Greinke opened the joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency public hearing at 9:42 p.m. Jack Harty, representing Lafayette Partners, spoke in favor of the proposed development and responded tO Agency/Council questions. Doreen Jacobs, co-owner of Electric Eye video store located in the Newforth Shopping Center, read her letter dated July 1, 1985, per- taining to the subject disposition and development agreement. The City Manager/Executive Director and City Attorney responded to the ten questions posed by Mrs. Jacobs. Don Hall, representing the Christian Science Reading Room, was instructed to contact Burnett-Ehline directly on when tenants will know the cost of what will be available in Lafayette Plaza. Earl Jacobs, co-owner of Electric Eye, voiced great dissatisfaction with negotiations between tenants, City staff, and the relocation consultant to date. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the joint public hearing was closed at 10:18 p.m. Acting as the City Council, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded b Edgar, to approve the Disposition & Development Agreement (DDAT between the Agency and Lafayette Partners. Following a question- and-answer period, the motion carried 5-0. Acting as the Redevelopment Agency, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to aprove the Disposition & Development Agreement (DDA) between the Agency and Lafayette Partners. Carried 5-0. 45 85-29 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8, 7-1-85 V. PUBLIC INPUT None. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the entire Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 1, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 17, 1985 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,734,049.89 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,339.18 50 3.REJECTION OF CLAIM OF CRAIG & DEBORAH PHILLIPS; DATE OF LOSS: 2-27-85; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 5/28/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-31 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 4. EAST TUSTIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-1 - APPROVAL OF WILLDAN ASSOCIATES AS THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER Approved Willdan Associates as the Assessment Engineer for the East Tustin Assessment District No. 85-1, and authorized the Mayor to execute the subject Professional Services Agreement as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 25 45; 85-30 5. RESOLUTION NO. 85-69 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PERSONS TO PERFORM VARIOUS DUTIES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS Adopted Resolution No. 85-69 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 25 6. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS - TRACT NO. 12018 (SW Corner of Holt Avenue and Warren Avenue) Accepted the public improvements within Tract No. 12018 and authorized the release of all pertinent bonds as indicated in the staff report dated June 19, 1985, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 99 7. RESOLUTION NO. 85-70 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN ACCEPTING WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDA- TION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (NEWPORT AVENUE RESERVOIR ROOF REPAIRS} Adopted Resolution No. 85-70 and authorized payment of final 10% retention mount of $3,124.55 providing no liens or stop payment notices have been filed within 30' days as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 107 8. RESOLUTION NO. 85-71 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, INFORMING THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS Adopted Resolution No. 85-71 as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 95 9. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS - TRACT NO. 11582 (SW Corner of San Juan Street and Orange Street} Accepted the public improvements within Tract No. 11582 and authorized the release of all pertinent bonds as indicated in subject staff report dated June 20, 1985, as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 99 10. PUBLIC HEARING - FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 BUDGET Announced there will be a Public Hearing on July 15, 1985, on the 1985-86 Budget and the proposed use of 1985-86 Revenue Sharing proceeds, and authorized the City Manager to expend funds subsequent to July 1, 1985, within the appropriation limits established by the adopted 1984-85 Budget until such time as the Council takes action on the proposed 1985-86 Budget as recommended by the Finance Director. 29 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9, 7-1-85 11. RESOLUTION NO. 85-61 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-196 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF VALENCIA AND DEL AMO AVENUES Adopted Resolution No. 85-61 as recommended by the Community Development Department. 99 12. RESOLUTION NO. 85-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-197 LOCATED AT 1361 VALENCIA AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 85-62 as recommended by the Com- munity Development Department. 99 13. REAPPOINTMENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Appointed Mary Ann Chamberlain as representative and Jeff Davis as alternate to the Orange County Housing Authority Advisory Committee. 67 14. RESOLUTION NO. 85-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Tustin APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 85-212 LOCATED AT NORTH- WESTERLY CORNER OF RED HILL AVENUE AT BELL AVENUE Adoption of Resolution No. 85-63 as recommended by the Com- munity Development 99 15. RESOLUTION NO. 85-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COM- MISSION CONCERNING USE PERMIT NO. 85-9 (NEWPORT AVE. BETWEEN MAIN ST. AND EL CAMINO REAL) Adopted Resolution No. 85-64 as approved by the City Council. 81 VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION See Public Hearings 5 and 6. VIII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION See Public Hearings 2 and 3. IX. OLD BUSINESS None. X. NEW BUSINESS 1. AWARD OF BID - IRRIGATION, LANDSCAPE AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AT COLUMBUS-TUSTIN PARK PHASE I Bids for subject project were received on June 18, 1985, as follows: Hondo Company, Inc., Santa Ana $134,919.15 Ultimo General Contractors, Dana Point $158,397.32 Valleycrest Landscape, Santa Ana $168,002.35 Artistic Landscape, South Gate $I72,669.15 "' C & B Engineering, Los Angeles $205,272.50 ~ Taylor-Shafer, Inc., Long Beach $206,544.00 As recommended in the inter-com dated June 18, 1985, prepared by the Director of Public Works, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to award the contract for the subject park improvements to Hondo Company, Inc., Santa Ana, in the amount of $134,919.15. Motion carried 5-0. 77 2. EAST TUSTIN LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT- RESOLUTION NO. 85-72 Ron Wolford, representing Berryman & Stephenson, Inc., presented the staff report and recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated June 21, 1985, prepared by the Administrative Assistant. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10, 7-1-85 It was then moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to: 1) Approve the Engineer's Report as a preliminary document; 2) Adopt the following; and RESOLUTION NO. 85-72 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF TUSTIN LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND ' TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 3) Set July15, 1985, as the date for public hearing to discuss subject district. The motion carried 5-0. 25 XI. REPORTS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JUNE 24, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to receive and file the Planning Commission Action Agenda of June 24, 1985. Car- ried 5-0. 80 2. INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF MAY 31, 1985 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to receive and file subject report dated June 24, 1985, prepared by the Finance Director. The motion carried 5-0. 50 3. STEERING COMMITTEE FOR A SENIOR CENTER PROGRESS REPORT As recommended by City staff, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to continue subject matter to July 15, 1985. Car- ried 5-0. 41 XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - JULY 8, 1985 The City Manager recommended the Council adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on July 8, 1985, at 6:30 p,m, to consider an agree- ment between the City and the United States Marine Corps regarding Myford Road. 2. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session to consider personnel matters. 3. KUDOS TO MAYOR GREINKE Councilman Hoesterey commended Mayor Greinke on his conduct of this evening's lengthy meeting. 4. HANDLING OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Councilwoman Kennedy referenced the inter-com dated May 29, 1985, from the Community Development Department on subject item. In accordance with the City Manager's recommendation, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to direct staff to report back on the most beneficial method for Tustin to regulate the handling of toxic waste, including a possible addendum to the business 1.icerise application whi ch would requi re a statement on whether or not a business in any way involves the use, storage of manufacture of hazardous or toxic materials. The motion carried 5-0. 102 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11, 7-1-85 5.. CITY-WIDE TRAFFIC SIGNALS In response to Councilwoman Kennedy's comments, the City Manager reported that synchronization of traffic signals City-wide will be addressed in a report to Council in the near future. 94 6. IRVINE VALLEY COLLEGE Mayor Greinke reported that he was honored to speak at the open house at the newly-named Irvine Valley College (formerly Saddleback Collge North) which was held earlier in the day. XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; CLOSED SESSION - ADJOURNMENT Mayor Greinke announced that the City Council would recess to a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Sec- tion 54957. At 10:37 p.m. it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session as stated above; and thence adjourn to an Adjourned Regular Meeting on July 8, 1985, at 6:30 p.m., and thence to the next regular meeting on July 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0. MAYOR cLER