The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC MINUTES 1985 06 03 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA JUNE 3, 1985 I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION The meeting was called to order by Mayor Greinke at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. Councilman Edgar led the Pledge of Allegiance, and the Invocation was given by Councilwoman Kennedy. II. ROLL CALL Councilpersons Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Donald J. Saltarelli, Mayor Pro Tem Richard B. Edgar Ronald B. Hoesterey Ursula E. Kennedy Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager James G. Rourke, City Attorney Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs. Janet Hester, Administrative Secretary Approximately 35 in the audience III. PROCLAMATION 1. BOB BOIES - GOLDEN TOUCH AWARD RECIPIENT Mayor Greinke read and presented a proclamation commending Bob Boles upon his selection by Tustin High students to receive ATSC's Golden Touch Award for his work with youth. Mr. Boies extended his thanks to the Council and students. 84 SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS Mayor Greinke recognized and welcomed Jim Sumrow, Southern California Edison Company, who was recently appointed to represent the Tustin area. The Mayor commented that the Second Annual E1 Camino Real Championship Chili Cookoff was a tremendous success, and he lauded City staff and committee members on their work in coordinating the event. IV. PUBLIC HEARING 1. PROPOSED DESIGNATION OF LAGUIta, ROAD, FROM NEWPORT AVENUE TO FlYFORD ROAD, TO EL CANINO REAL - RESOLUTION NO. 85-56 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the City -'- Attorney as contained in his inter-com dated April 26, 1985. The public hearing was opened by Mayor Greinke at 7:10 p.m. Margaret Greinke, 230 South "A" Street, representing the Tustin Area Historical Society, chronicled Laguna Road's history and pre- sented a petition containing 35 signatures requesting retention of the Laguna Road designation. Trudy Wilson, Tustin Chamber of Commerce Di rector, stated that the Chamber Board of Directors is unanimously in favor of the name change and spokein support of same. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 6-3-85 Walter Flaherty spoke in favor of the proposed street name change. There were no other speakers on the matter, and the public hearing was closed at 7:17 p.m. After Council discussion, it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Greinke, to adopt the following: RESOLUTION NO. 85-56 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING DESIGNATION OF LAGUNA ROAD, FROM NEWPORT AVENUE TO MYFORD ROAD, TO EL CAMINO REAL Councilmembers Kennedy, Hoesterey, Saltarelli and Greinke spoke in favor of the motion in the best interest of street continuity and identity, and they expressed their greatest respect for the Histor- ical Society. Councilman Edgar spoke in opposition on the basis of preserving Tustin's heritage. The motion carried 4-1, Edgar opposed. 96 V. PUBLIC INPUT None. VI. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, to approve the enti re Con- sent Calendar. Edgar and Greinke registered an abstention on the Minutes of the May 23, 1985, Adjourned Regular Meeting. The motion carried 5-0. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MAY 20, 1985, REGULAR MEETING MAY 23, 1985, ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING (Edgar and Greinke abstained.) 2o APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $461,065.99 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $128,296.48 50 3.REJECTION OF CLAIM OF B. J. MC ADAMS, INC.; DATE OF LOSS: 8/29/84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 5/10/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-29 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney, 40 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF CLARENCE MILTON STANFIELD; DATE OF LOSS: 8/29/84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 5/10/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-28 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney, 40 5.REJECTION OF CLAIM OF L. KENYON LILJEGREN; DATE OF LOSS: 3/12/85; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 4/24/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-25 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney, 40 6. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF ROBERT & YVONNE LEGGETT; DATE OF LOSS: 12/27/84; DATE FILED WITH CITY: 3/21/85; CLAIM NO.: 85-19 Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 7. SCANTRON AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT CO. AND THE CITY OF TUSTIN REGARDING CIRCULATION FEES FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 7 AREA (1361VALENCIA AVENUE) Authorized the execution of subject agreement as recommended by the Community Development Department, 45; 85-25 VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 1. LICENSE & PERMIT BOARD PROCEDURES - ORDINANCE NO. 929 The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Community Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated June 3, 1985, prepared by the Community Development Department. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-3-85 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 929 have first reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 929 by the City Clerk and brief Council discussion, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 929 be introduced as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 929 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS REGULATIONS Carried 5-0. 31 VIII, ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION 1, INFRACTION CITATION ORDINANCE - ORDINANCE NO, 932 It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 932 have second reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 932 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 932 be passed and adopted: ORDINANCE NO, 932 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 1121 RELATIVE TO VIOLATIONS, PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT, TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 1132 RELATIVE TO AUTHORITY TO MAKE ARRESTS, AND TUSTIN CITY CODE SECTION 1133 RELATIVE TO CITATION PROCEDURES Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli NOES: None ABSENT: None 81 2, MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT ALONG FIRST STREET - URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 933 It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance No. 933 have first reading by title only. Motion carried 5-0. Following first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 933 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded b~ Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 933 be introduced. Carried 4-1, Saltarelli opposed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 933 have second reading by title only. Carried 5-0. Following second reading by title only of Ordinance No 933 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Kennedy, that Ordinance No. 933 be passed and adopted: ORDINANCE NO, 933 - AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSALS OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FIRST STREET PROPERTIES Mayor Pro Tem Saltarelli spoke inopposition to Ordinance No. 933. Roll call vote: AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy NOES: Saltarelli ABSENT: None 81 IX, OLD BUSINESS None, X, NEW BUSINESS 1, BID AWARD - SAN JUAN STREET STORM DRAIN FACILITY FO7P24 & LATERALS Bids for subject project were received on May 28, 1985~as follows: The Beechef Construction Company, West Covina $364,051.25 Dabco Construction, Huntington Beach $393,848.00 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 6-3-85 Changing Times Enterprises, Buena Park $394,687.00 Jan Earnest Enterprises, Inc., Anaheim $415,706.00 Gosh Construction Corp., Los Angeles $423,565.25 Mladen Bunrich Construction Co., Sunland $437,248.00 Thibodo Construction, Vista $463,102.50 As recommended in the inter-com dated May 29, 1985, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to award the contract for subject project to The Beecher Construc- tion Company, West Covina, in the amount of $364,051.25. The motion carried 5-0. 91 XI. REPORTS None. XII. OTHER BUSINESS 1. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION The City Manager requested a Closed Session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. 2. LIBRARY PARKING LOT PROBLEMS Councilwoman Kennedy reported that she has received complaints regarding users of the Community Center parking in the Library lot on Saturdays during library hours. She requested that staff con- tact Library personnel to determine the seriousness of the matter. 3, "PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" Councilwoman Kennedy acknowledged "Public Works Week" during May 26 through June 1, 1985. She commended the Tustin Public Works Department, and the Mayor indicated he would forward a letter of commendation to the department. Agnes Bacon, Mountain View Drive, indicated her street was in need of pothole repairs. 4. CLOCK AT EL CAMINO REAL & MAIN STREET In response to the Mayor, the Public Works Director stated he would investigate the matter of a possible mallunction of the chimes in the clock at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and Main Street. XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; CLOSED SESSION - RECONVENED It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar., to recess to the Redevelopment Agency, and thence to a Closed session to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Carried 5-0. The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 p.m. with all members present. XIV. ADJOURNMENT Council concurred to adjourn to the Budget Workshop on June 10, 1985, at 4:00 p.m.; thence to a Workshop on East Tustin plans on June 15, 1985, at 8:00 a.m.; and thence to the next regular meeting on June 17, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. MAYOR