HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1984 08 20 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 20, 1984
I. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Greinke at 7:01 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Alle-
giance was led by Councilman Edgar, and the Invocation was given by
-'- Councilman Saltarelli.
i II. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present: Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Donald J. Saltarelli
Councilpersons Absent: Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
:~' Charles R. Thayer~ Chief of Police
Royleen A. White, Dir. of Com. & Admin. Srvcs.
Jeff Kolin, Recreation Superintendent
ApproXimately 14 in the audience
III: PROCLAMATION - SEPTEMBER, "LEUKEMIA MONTH"
Mayor Pro Tem Greinke stated that Council has proclaimed the month of
September, 1984, "Leukemia Month" urging all citizens to support the
1984 Leukemia Society Campaign to raise funds for leukemia research and
patient-aid programs. Because no one was present to accept the procla-
~ mation, Mayor Pro Tem Greinke requested that it be mailed to the Chap-
! ter President. 84
IV. PUBLIC INPUT
1. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
James Plesetz, 17731 Miller Drive, spoke in opposition to expansion
of John Wayne Airport on behalf of area residents, and urged Coun-
cil efforts in favor of Tustin residents pertaining to New Business
Item No. 4 - John Wayne Airport Expansion, EIR 508 (see page 4 for
Council action on this matter}. 101
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
'Nofie.: !''
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Ed at, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the entire
Consent Calendar. ~arried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy absent.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - AUGUST 6, 1984
~" 2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $108,626.64
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $490,291.04 50
3. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF LUCKY STORES (JANET TURBES); DATE OF LOSS:
2-3-83; DATE FILED: 6-26-84; CLAIM NO.: 84-16
Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40
4. TUSTIN PUBLIC INFORMATION, INC.
Authorized the Finance Director to transfer $7,300 from the
Community Services Department budget to Tustin Public Informa-
tion, Inc., for mailing of Tustin Today as recommended by the
Recreation Superintendent. 41
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 2, 8-20-84
5. RESOLUTION NO). 84-64 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING IRVINE BOULEVARD BETWEEN RANCHWOOD
ROAD AND 4320.33 FEET EASTERLY TO BE A COUNTY HIGHWAY DURING THE
PERIOD OF IMPROVEMENT BY THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
Adopted Resolution No. 84-64 as recommended by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer. 95
-~!~ '6. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS
. ~ :'(Redhi.ll Avenue between San Juan Street and North of Lance Drive,
and Lance Drive between Redhill Avenue and CharlomaDrive)
Authorized the installation of signing to restrict on-street
parking during street sweeping hours, 6:00 a.m. to;noon on
Friday, on both sides of subject streets and that warnings be
issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after sign
installation as recommended by the Director of Public Works/
City Engineer. 75
7. RESOLUTION NO. 84-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REVISED CLASSIFICATION PLAN OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Adopted Resolution No. 84-63 as recommended by the Director of
Community and Administrative Services. 79
8. RESOLUTION NO. 84-62 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ACTING ON AN APPEAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL
AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNING USE
PERMIT NO. 84-8 {Georgetown Manor Apartments, 13181-13195 Gwyneth
Drive }
Adopted Resolution No. 84-62 as requested by the City Council.
81
VII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None.
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
1. ZONE CHANGE NO. 84-3 -ORDINANCE NO. 916
It was moved b~, Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No.
916 have second reading by tit e only. Motion carried 3-0,
Hoesterey and Kennedy absent. Following second reading by title
only of Ordinance No. 916 by the City Clerk, it was moved by Edgar,
seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance No. 916 be passed and
adopted as follows:
ORDINANCE ND. 916 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING THE PROPERTIES ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SEVENTEENTH STREET AND CARROLL WAY (ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS
395-142-05 THROUGH 395-142-09} FROM RETAIL COMMERCIAL .(C-1} DIS-
TRICT TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CG-PUD}
DISTRICT
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Saltarelli
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hoesterey, Kennedy 110
IX. OLD BUSINESS
X. NEW BUSINESS
1. SAN DIEGO CREEK SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PROGRAM
The staff report and recommendation were presented by the Director
of Public Works/City Engineer as contained in his inter-com dated
July 27, 1984, on subject item.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 3, 8-20-84
The City Manager noted that Cost estimates for construction do not
include State and/or Federal grant funds, and any amounts from out-
side sources, which is highly probable, would decrease Tustin's
share. He added that the City should view the program in the con-
text of overall flood control improvements in the community; i.e.,
if the Orange County Flood Control District is expected to fund
future improvements (Peters Canyon Wash, for example), then the
City should accept its share of this project so that a reciprocal
arrangement is established.
The Director of Public Works explained to Councilman Saltarelli
how designated percentages by the five participating agencies were
established and what the proposed program will accomplish.
Councilman Saltarelli expressed concern that Tustin would risk
being heavily burdened if one of the agencies were to withdraw from
the program, when the benefits to Tustin are nebulous. The Direc-
tor of Public Works explained that if any agency withdraws from the
program, the Executive Committee could disband the plan, and a
State-mandated program would be effected. The City Attorney stated
that he reviewed the agreement and approved same.
Following further discussion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by
Greinke, to authorize the Mayor to execute the Implementation
Agreement for in-channel facilities along San Diego Creek between
~ .... the City of Tustin, the County of Orange, the Orange County Flood
Control District, the City of Newport Beach, the City of Irvine,
and the Irvine Company.
The Director of Public Works added that if in the first step of the
program the Executive Committee determines that inadequate funds
are available, the program can be terminated. The Director veri-
fied that the proposed payment schedule is based upon completion,
... and no advance payment is required.
The motion carried 2-1, Saltarelli opposed, Hoesterey and Kennedy
absent. 45; 84-33
2. JAMBOREE BLVD./SANTA ANA FREEWAY INTERCHANGE - RESOLUTION NO. 84-65
Pursuant to the staff recommendation contained in the inter-com
dated August 13, 1984, prepared by the Director of Public Works, it
was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to:
1) Adopt the following:
RESOLUTION ltD. 84-65 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, SUPPORTING THE JAMBOREE BOULEVARD/SANTA ANA
FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AS A LOCALLY FUNDED PROJECT
2} Request the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) to
process an amendment to the State Transportation Improvement
Program {STIP} to include ~he Jamboree Boulevard/Santa Ana
Freeway interchange as a locally funded project;
3) Direct staff to initiate project development activities with
CalTrans;
4) Authorize staff to negotiate a contract with LSA, Inc., for
project management and preparation of an Environmental Assess-
ment for the interchange project; and
5} Authorize staff to solicit proposals for the engineering design
services for the Jamboree Boulevard/Santa Aria Freeway inter-
change to proceed concurrently with the environmental process.
Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy absent. 54
3. TRASH COLLECTION FEE - RESOLUTION NO. 84-66
The City Manager presented the staff report and recommendation,
responded to Council questions, and noted that Resolution No. 84-66
was handed out to Council this evening.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 4, 8-20-84
It was ~ved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to adopt the follow-
ing:
RESOLUTION NO. 84-66 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FIXING FEES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF
SOLID WASTE
Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy absent. 45; 83-26
102
4. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT EXPANSION, EIR 508
:' The staff report and recommendation-were presented by the Community
Development Director as contained in the inter-com dated August 20,
1984, prepared by the Community Development Department, Council
discussion followed,
James Plesetz, 17731 Miller Drive, expressed concern regarding the
newer aircraft which are reportedly quieter in take-off but noisier
in landing, and stated that increasing the number of flights
increases the chances of an aviation hazard/accident over Tustin.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to authorize staff
to address a letter to the County of Orange, Board of Supervisors,
outlining the following concerns:
1) The potential impact of airport expansion on vehicular traffic
through Tustin (via Red Hill Avenue).
2) Include in the analyses as a viable alternative the considera-
tion of an off-shore airport with runways parallel to the
coastline.
3) As a mitigating measure, move the Instrument Landing System
(ILS) approach west of the Newport Freeway which would divert
commercial flights over currently existing non-residential uses
(industrialized area of Santa Ana).
4) Encourage moving general aviation flights to smaller local air-
i. />ports which woul~s~ignificantly: reduce overflights.
5) Conduct additional noise studies that compare the single event
noise impacts of the currently used MD-80 with the newer Class
A aircraft (B-757, 767) and Class AA aircraft (B-737-300) on
overflights over Tustin.
6) The potential impacts of single event and CNEL take-offs toward
Tustin.
7) There is not a sufficient level of detail to consider MCAS, E1
Toro, or Santiago Airport as potential airport site alterna-
tives. The City of Tustin can expect additional noise and
traffic impacts, neither of which are sufficiently examined.
8) As a mitigating measure, examine the potential noise impact on
overflights for varying types of descent patterns into the air-
port. Develop an optimum descent pattern that ensures aircraft
safety while reducing noise impact. Develop a procedure that
ensures compliance, while making airlines responsible for the
actions of their pilots.
9) The EIR does not examine fuel dumping procedures carried out by
jet aircraft. The EIR should examine these procedures and what
impact the additional flights may have on the Tustin area in
this regard.
10) The City of Tustin Can support growth of the John Wayne Airport
if it can be quantitatively shown that the additional flights
can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. The City would
define a level of insignificance as a single event noise level
impact that is either the same or less than current overflight
noise levels.
Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy. 101
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 5, 8-20-84
5. TUSTIN TILLER DAYS PARADE - TUSTIN JAYCEES
Following consideration of the letter dated August 15, 1984, from
the Tustin Jaycees, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli,
to approve the following:
1) The Tustin Jaycees will procure adequate liability insurance to
cover their own involvement in the parade, while the City will
procure its own coverage to the extent of its involvement, with
each party then having coverage to the extent it may deem
necessary;
2) Only those equestrian units with substantial parade experience
(i.e., 6 parades within the last 12 months} and good safety
records will be allowed to participate; in addition, with the
exception of military units, these entries will be required to
provide evidence of at least $1,000,000 of liability coverage
and sign an agreement relieving the City and Tustin Jaycees of
any liability resulting from their participation in the parade;
and
3) The City will provide advance funds to the Tustin Jaycees to
run the parade in an amount not to exceed $3,100.00.
Carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy assent. 34
XI. REPORTS
11. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - AUGUST 13, 1984
Following the Community Development Director's response to Council
questions regarding items pertaining to the proposed satellite dish
antenna ordinance, monument signs fop the revitalized center at
Seventeenth Street and Carroll Way (former Ralph's shopping
center), and the automotive service center at 1122-1192 Laguna
Road, it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to ratify the
August 13, 1984, Planning Commission Action Agenda. Carried 3-0,
Hoesterey and Kennedy absent. 80
2. QUARTERLY REPORT SPRING 1984 - COMMUNITY SERVICES
Mayor Pro Tem Greinke commended the Community Services Department
on the upcoming 5K Run to be held in conjunction with Tustin Tiller
Days. Councilman Edgar noted that the Community Services program
is self-sufficient and benefits many people.
Subject report dated August 14, 1984, prepared by the Recreation
Superintendent was received and filed by unanimous informal con-
sent. 41
3. CONMUNICOM UPDATE PROGRESS REPORT
The Director of Public Works reported that all construction
required for service within the City was complete~ on July 27,
1984, with the exception of the Enderl e Gardens area ~here property
easements on private streets were not granted. He added that
acquisition by United Cable will be completed on September 18,
1984, within the deadline date established for the transaction
which was October 1, 1984. 53
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
1. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL HEARING - MARK ZIMMERMAN
In accordance with the City Attorney's request, it was tm~
Saltarelli, seconded by Greinke, to authorize and direct
ance of 10 subpoenas for the administrative appeal hearing of Mark
Zimmerman, and direct the Mayor and City Clerk to cause said sub-
poenas to be issued. Motion carried 3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy
absent. 79
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Page 6, 8-20-84
2. AMENDMENT TO THE BROWN ACT
Following Council/staff discussion regarding recent amendments to
the Brown Act relative to disclosure of legal matters discussed in
Closed Session, Mayor Pro Tem Greinke requested staff provide Coun-
cil with a copy of same. 61
3. COLUMBUS TUSTIN WELL PROJECT STATUS
The Director of Public Works responded to Councilman Edgar that the
September 17 meeting is the target date for Council approval of
plans/specs and authorization to advertise for bids on the Columbus
Tustin water well design project (Phase II). 107
4. "B"STREET STORM DRAIN
In response to Councilman Edgar, the Director of Public Works
reported that staff has contacted CalTrans regarding the "B"
Street/Nisson Road storm drain project to correct flooding problems
during the rainy season. Commencement of improvements is dependent
upon which alternative is chosen for the expansion of the I-5/55
Freeway interchange, and staff isawaiting word on the matter. 91
5, EASTERN CORRIDOR TRAFFIC STUDIES
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Greinke, to authorize a letter
be sent to the Orange County Board of Superwsors to insure that
traffic studies include the Eastern Corridor going southerly of the
I-5 rather than stopping at the I-5. Carried 3-0, Hoesterey and
Kennedy absent. 100
6. PUBLIC INSTITUTION FACILITIES
The City Manager responded to Mayor Pro Tem Greinke that staff has
had dialog with the Tustin Unified School District regarding East
Tustin development and use of school facilities, and staff will
report details to Council.
XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT; ADJOURNMENT
At 8:00 p.m., it was moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess
to~theFRedevelopment Agency,' and thence adjourn to the next adjourned
regular meeting on Tuesday, September 4, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried
3-0, Hoesterey and Kennedy absent.
~~MA~~