HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 ASSIGN CONS SVCS 03-03-97DATE:
MARCH 3, 1997
Inter-Com
NO. 4
3-3-97
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
CHRISTINE A. S1TINGLETON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER .~" ~-'
AUTHORIZATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF CONSULTANT
AGREEMENT
SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an assignment of the
Consultant Services Agreement with Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group to KMG Consuking.
FISCAL IMPACT
The anticipated costs for the preparation of the Business and Development Plan will remain at $99,300.
Funding has been secured'in the amoum of $50,000 from a Department of Defense Office of Economic
Adjustment grant with the balance of costs funded with 1996-97 Community Development Block
Grant funds.
BACKGROUND and DISCUSSION
On April 1, 1996, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Consultant Services
Agreement with the Sedway KOtin Mouchly Group for preparation of a Business and Development
Plan for MCAS, Tustin (Staff Report Attached). These plans will be essential to the City's analysis of
how best to proceed with the acquisition and redevelopment of the base. The preparation of these
plans was significantly delayed while the Coast Guard's request for existing housing units was being
resolved. With resolution of the Coast Guard issue, work is now set to proceed. On January 24, 1997,
KMG Consulting (KMG) sent the attached letter requesting an assignment of the current Consultant
Services Agreement. KMG is a Kotin Mouchly Group.
The City Attomey's Office has reviewed the requested assignmem and recommends that the City
Council concur in any assignment of the agreement.
Attachments
KBB:kKMGASSIGN
KMG CONSULTING
KOTIN MOUCHLY GROUP
Real Estate and Urban Economics
RECEI' ." D
1Z100 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 1050
Los Angeles, California 900~.5
Tel 310 820-0900
Fax 310 820-1703
www.kmgconsult.com
January 24, 1997
Ms. Christine Shingleton
Assistant City Manager
City of Tustin
Tustin Civic Center
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
Re.'
Assignment of Contract for Consulting Services Relating to MCAS Tustin Reuse,
Business and Development Plan
Dear Ms. Shingleton:
To follow up on our recent telephone conversation, we are sending you this document for
your signature in order to formally assign the consulting contract between the City of Tustin
and Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group to KMG Consulting (KMG). KMG is a successor
company to Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group. Your signature at the place indicated at the end
of this letter will constitute the assignment of this contract.
The scope of work to be performed and the contract amount will remain the same. KMG
also intends to retain the services of the same subcontractors, Public Financial Management
(PFM) and CCL Construction Consultants. In addition, KMG will utilize the services of
Sedway Group as a subcontractor on certain aspects of the economic conveyanCe analysis,
spedfically Terry Margerum and Naomi Porat, who have extensive experience on the Fort
Ord reuse plan.
Because of the time that has passed since the proposal was submitted and the. contract
awarded, we are enclosing a revised proposed work schedule which indicates which work
tasks will be completed at what time during the estimated five months required to complete
the assignment.
KMG
Ms. Christine Shingleton
January 24,1997
Page 2
We look forward to formally commencing work on this contract beginning with a kick-off
meeting and tour of the air station during the week of January 27.
Sincerely yours,
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT TO KMG CONSULTING AGREED TO BY:
Christine Shingleton
Assistant City Manager
City of Tustin
Date
C:~ILES\TUS53796\WPk~SSGNMT.RSS
z
o
o
DATE:
APRIL 1, 1996
TO-
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY F1ANAGER
FROM: CHRISTINE A. SHINGLETON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR
PREPARATION OF A BUSINESS AND DEVELOPIHENT PLAN
. .
Recommendation
It ,is recOmmended that the City Council authorize th.e City l~lanager to execute a
Consultant'Services Agreement with the Sedway Kotin Plouchly Group for preparation of a
Business and DeVelopment Plan. '
Eiscal Impact
The anticipated costs for the preparation of the Business and Development Plan would be
$99,300. Partial funding for the work has been secured in the amount of $50,000 from
a Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment grant. The balance of the
anticipated costs for the project are recommended to be funded with 1996-9 7 Community
Development Block Grant funds. ,
~Back~ound and Discussion
On July 20,-1995, the Department of Defense published the final rules for implementing
portions of the National Defense Authorization Acz.__for FY 1994. The[rules provide the
City of Tustin an'opportunity to obtain dfle to surplfls military prop~rfies at or.below fair
market value through an Economic Development. Conveyance (EDC). The purpose of an
EDC is to foster economic development and the creation of |ohs, enhancing economic
recovery of areas negatively impacted by base closure. Approval of an EDC requires the
submission of an applicatiQn and number of items of information which eXplain whY an
EDC is being requested. One of the items to be submitted is a Business and Development
Pi.an which must include the following:
· A development timetable, phasing plan and cash flow analysis;
·
· A market and financial feasibility analysis describing the economic viability of the
project, including an estimate of net proceeds over a fifteen-year period, the proposed
consideration or payment to the Department of Defense, and the estimated fair market
value of the property;
· A cost esdmate and justification for infrastructure and other investments needed for the
development of the EDC parcel;
· Local investment and proposed financing strategies for. the develc~pment.
City Council Report
April 1, 1996
Page Two
The preparation of a Business and Development Plan is a prerequisite to the City of Tustin
making an application for an EDC. Based on the economic and financial analysis provided
in. the Business and Development Plan, the City would decide whether to seek one or more
economic conveyances of portions or all of the base. If the City decides to seek and
EDC(s), the Business and Development Plan will become an integral part of that
application. In addition, the document will be a critical resource document for planning
and administration purposes as well as for securing much needed loans, fi~ancing and bonds
necessary to offset the significant, infrastructure improvement costs which must be
accommodated for economic development to occUr at the base.. The City is interested in
rapidly transferring the base for reuse by the private sector. Regardless of whether an EDC
application is.submitted or whether the Department of the Navy approves an EDC request
by the LRA, a Business and Development Plan is desired to assist in making: the application
decision and in making further business decisions relative to property disposal at the base.
Due to limited personnel resources, the City solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) to
develop the required Business and Development Plan. An RFP was sent to 31 firms in late
summer of 199.5. Responses were received from nine lead firms (Attachment A). After a
len~hy ranking process and reference review, interviews were held with the follOwing firms:
Williams Kuebeibeck ~ Associates
[] Gruen, Gruen ~ Associates
[] Economic Research Associates
[] Sedway Kotin Mouchly Group
The following representatives were members of the City's interview panel and ranking
process: Assistant City Manager, Rede. ve. lopmen, t__ Pro~ram Manager~'. Senior Planner,
Chairman of the' City's Economic Development Coundl (Chuck ~Oble from Lea and
Associates), and John Lynch, a representative from Kutak Rock and one of the City's
consultants on base closure legal issues in Washin~on, D.C. Based.on the interviews and
reference checks, the Sedway Kodn Mouchly' Group '(SKM) was s~lected as the most
qualified firm to undertake the project. SKM is currendy working with Fort Ord and
Treasure Island in Northern California on developing Business Development Plans. The
interview panel also established some parameters for their choice of SKM which, required
additional contract negotiation and an increase of the oriCnally prepared contract price,
including additional principal involvement and sub-consultant work. Significant work is not
anticipated to begin on the project until resolution of the Coast Guard issue.
The attached contract has been approved by the City Attorney's office. The proposed
project has been partially funded by a $50,000 grant from the Department of Defense
Office of Economic..Development. The remaining portion of the funding is recommended
to be funded by the City's I c)c)6-c)7 Community Block Grant application.
At~chment