HomeMy WebLinkAboutPH 1 CODE AMEND 92-005 03-01-93PUBLIC HEARING N0. 1
3-1-93
%�.ALNUM
Inter -Com
DATE: MARCH 1, 1993 sT
TO: WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT 92-005 ( SMART SMR)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Certify the Negative Declaration as adequate for the project
by adopting Resolution No. 93-18; and
2. Have first reading by title only and introduction of Ordinance
No. 1097 approving Code Amendment 92-005.
BACKGROUND
In February of 1991, the applicant, SMART SMR of California, Inc.,
was authorized by the Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) to
construct and operate the first dual-purpose digital mobile radio
system in the United States.
Section 9271b of the Tustin City Code allows public utilities,
including natural gas, electricity and telephone communications, in
all zoning districts. To be considered a "public utility", a use
or service provider must be granted a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) by the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) of the State of California. The PUC has not granted a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to the SMART SMR
system; therefore, it is not considered a "public utility".
While the applicant has not yet selected any specific sites for
antenna facilities in Tustin, the Tustin Zoning Code, Specific
Plans and Planned Community District Regulations do not presently
contain any provisions for the regulation of such a proposed use.
Therefore, SMART SMR of California, Inc. is requesting certain
amendments to specific sections of the zoning code and Planned
Community District regulations related to industrial areas.
The amendments currently proposed would modify:
is Tustin City Code Subsection 9242b relating to the Industrial
(M) District;
City Council Report
Code Amendment 92-005
March 1,1993
Page 2
2. Franklin/Walnut Avenues Irvine Industrial Complex Planned
Community District Regulations Section VI., Subsection C; and
3. Red Hill/Warner Avenues Irvine Industrial Complex Planned
Community District Regulations Part I, Section I.
The proposed amendments would allow antennas, their support
structures and accessory equipment buildings or enclosures operated
for a use that has not been granted a CPCN, and located at least
1,000 feet from any residentially zoned property, in the specified
industrial districts, subject to the approval of a conditional use
permit.
On February 8, 1993, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
4001 recommending to the City Council approval of the proposed code
amendment.
There are well over 1000 property owners in the citywide project
area and within 300 feet of the city boundary. Consequently, in
accordance with State law, no public hearing notices were mailed to
individual property owners. However, a 1/8 page display ad of the
public hearing notice, identifying the time, date and location of
the public hearing for the proposal, was published in the Tustin
News, and posted at the Community Development Department public
counter and Police Department. The Tustin Meadows, Peppertree and
Laurelwood Associations, as well as the applicant, were forwarded
a copy of the agenda and final report on this matter.
DISCUSSION
Due to the rapid growth of the communications industry, it is
appropriate to amend the zoning code and other planning documents
to recognize and regulate antenna uses. However, the exact type
and configuration of future antenna facilities is somewhat
difficult to anticipate. The components of various antenna systems
are generally uniform; however, the design of each antenna
installation may vary. Each location will likely include the
antennas, support structures, cabling, and electrical and
mechanical equipment, such as batteries and air conditioners.
Antennas come in a variety of shapes and sizes including paneled or
sectored, whip or omni, and dish. Photographs of various antenna
types are attached as Attachment A. Land mobile radio systems,
such as the SMART SMR system, require an array of antennas; the
exact size, type and number of antennas is determined by the volume
and area of proposed coverage. Antennas must be mounted at a
City Council Report
Code Amendment 92-005
March 1,1993
Page 3
sufficient height to provide coverage to a reasonable geographic
area, adequate length of dispatch transmission, adequate overlap
with coverage areas of surrounding antennas, and in some cases,
achieve line -of -sight communication with surrounding antennas. In
discussion with the FCC, budget constraints have limited their
ability to respond to complaints of interference from outside
sources on home electronic and telephone equipment. However, they
will provide a filtering device to the effected party to eliminate
any interference that may be experienced. The FCC also indicated
that 99% of all complaints received are related to interference
created by citizen band and amateur radios or between different
commercial operators. Interference from a commercial operator on
home electronic equipment would be unlikely.
To provide optimal height, antennas can be ground, building or roof
mounted. Ground mounted antennas make use of a self-supporting
,structure which is generally referred to as a "mast" or "tower".
Masts are generally constructed of one or two materials: wood or
steel. The wood type is'similar to a standard utility pole; steel
poles are also referred to as "mono -poles". The design and
diameter of a pole varies by manufacturer and safety requirements
relating to antenna weight and resistance to wind load. Towers are
usually lattice type and can be guyed or non -guyed, depending on
wind conditions and loading. All masts and towers are subject to
requirements of the Uniform Building Codes and require a building
permit. Building -or roof -mounted antennas can be located on a roof
top, behind a parapet wall, or building facade. With new
technologies antennas can also be integrated into building walls.
Many, types of antenna installations require an equipment building
or enclosure. An existing structure, prefabricated shelter or
specially designed container could serve that purpose. Generally,
the equipment must be located near the antennas as well as required
electrical and telephone service connections. Essentially, each
site must be evaluated and designed individually.
The proposed code amendment would allow antenna facilities, such as
a ground -mounted mono -pole, building or roof mounted antenna,
located at least 1,000 feet from any residentially zoned property,
subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning
Commission. The Conditional Use Permit process would allow the
Commission to review on a case-by-case basis those facilities with
the potential to cause adverse impacts to surrounding properties.
Antenna facilities located less than 1,000 feet from any
residentially zoned property would not be authorized by the
proposed amendments. Attachment B illustrates the 1,000 foot
distance requirement from the effected industrial districts.
City Council Report
Code Amendment 92-005
March 1,1993
Page 4
The following language would be added to the list of conditionally
permitted uses in the specified industrial districts and planned
community district regulations:
Radio and tele -communications are rapidly growing fields which will
become increasingly important to business and residents in future
years. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Code and Planned
Community District Regulations would allow antennas as
conditionally permitted uses in certain industrial districts under
certain situations.
City Council Report
Code Amendment 92-005
March 1, 1993
Page 5
The proposed amendment is meant to largely apply to antennas
accommodating land mobile radio systems. Additional code
amendments will be forthcoming in the future and deal with antenna
applications such as are necessary for card operated gasoline
service stations.
CONCLUSION
Given the analysis conducted by the Community Development
Department and in consideration of comments from other agencies and
the public, it is concluded that the proposed amendments meet
requirements of the Tustin City Code and the California
Environmental Quality Act. The specific listing of antennas
operated for a use that has not been granted a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity by the PUC is appropriate and
compatible with currently permitted or conditionally permitted uses
in the Industrial District and Planned Community District for
industrial areas.
It is therefore recommended that
Amendment 92-005 and have first
introduction of Ordinance No. 1097.
a;
Daniel Fox
Senior Planner
the City Council approve Code
reading by title only and
//A
Christine Shingle
Assistant City Ma ager
Attachments: Resolution No. 93-18
Ordinance No. 1097
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
Attachment A, Antenna Examples
Attachment B. 1,000 Foot Distance Maps
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 93-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AS ADEQUATE FOR CODE AMENDMENT 92-005 INCLUDING
REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as
follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. The request to approve Code Amendment 92-005 is
considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
B. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this
project and has been distributed for public review.
C. Whereby, the Planning Commission and the City
Council of the City of Tustin have considered
evidence presented by the Community Development
Director and other interested parties with respect
to the subject Negative Declaration.
D. The Planning Commission and City Council have
evaluated the proposed final Negative Declaration
and determined it to be adequate and complete.
II. A Final Negative Declaration has been completed in
compliance with CEQA and State guidelines. The City
Council, having final authority over Code Amendment 92-
005, has received and considered the information
contained in the Negative Declaration, prior to approval
of the proposed project, and found that it adequately
discussed the environmental effects of the proposed
project. The City Council has found that the project
involves no potential for an adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources and
makes a De Minimis Impact Finding related to AB3158,
Chapter 1206, Statutes of 1990. On the basis of the
initial study and comments received during the public
review process, the City Council has found that, the
proposed projects would not have a significant effect on
the environment.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 93-18
March 1, 1993
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council, held on the 1st day of March, 1993.
LESLIE ANNE PONTIOUS
Mayor
MARY E. WYNN
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF TUSTIN
CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 93-18
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify
that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing
Resolution No. 93-18 was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City
Council, held on the 1st day of March, 1993.
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER:ABSENT:
MARY E. WYNN
City Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDINANCE NO. 1097
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF ARTICLE 9 OF
THE TUSTIN CITY CODE AND TWO PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS TO•ALLOW CERTAIN ANTENNAS
The City Council of the City of Tustin. finds and
determines as follows:
A. The Zoning Code was adopted to identify
specific land uses and standards of
development to occur within certain Zoning
Districts; and
B. It has been determined that present and future
communication technologies require the use of
antennas and appropriate accessory structures
not currently allowed in industrial areas by
the Zoning Code; and
C. The amendment is in the best interest of the
public health, safety and welfare in that it
will facilitate the installation of antennas
for communication systems; and
D. The amendment is consistent with the General
Plan in that it will not negatively impact the
orderly growth and development of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tustin
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Article 91 Chapter 21 Part 9 of the Tustin
City Code is hereby amended as follows:
A. Subsection 9242b entitled "Conditionally
Permitted Uses" is amended to add subsection
(j) to read as follows:
1
2
3
4
5.
i
6'
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance 1097
Page 2
Section 2. Section VI. of the Planned Community District
Regulations for the Irvine Industrial Complex (Franklin and
Walnut Avenues), adopted by Ordinance No. 611, as amended, is
hereby amended as follows:
A. Subsection C entitled "Permitted Uses Subject
to Conditional Use Permit" is amended to
modify and add subsections 12 and 13 to read
as follows:
34.1 Hazardous waste facilities, subject to
all standards and criteria contained in
the Tustin City Code.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance 1097
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
8'
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22,
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance 1097
Page 4
Section 3. Part I of the Planned Community District
Regulations for the Irvine Industrial Complex (Red Hill,
Warner, Bell, Mosher, and Morgan Avenues) adopted by
Ordinance No. 400, are hereby amended as follows:
A. SECTION I. entitled "PERMITTED USES" is amended to
modify the title, add subsection 10 and a
subsection entitled "Conditionally Permitted Uses"
to read as follows:
....................................................................
SECTION I. PERMITTED USES:..:...............................................................
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ordinance 1097
Page 5
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Tustin held on the 1st day of March, 1993.
LESLIE ANNE PONTIOUS
Mayor
MARY WYNN
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE 1097
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify
that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing
Ordinance No. 1097 was duly and regularly introduced, passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on
the 1st day of March, 1993, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
��v o
CITY OF TUSTIN �♦ _ ,�
GS �`
Community Development Department
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY FORM
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent YJVJ&
2. Address andhone Number of Proponent
1010ZYM100 r�I
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4. Agency Requiring Checklist
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on
attached sheets.)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: .
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
C.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d.
The destructions covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e.
Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any ban, inlet or
lake?
Yes Maybe No
J
NO
Yes Maybe No
g.
Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
✓
or similar hazards?
2. Air.
Will the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial air emission or
deterioration of ambient air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors?
C.
Alteration of air movement, moisture,
or temperatures, or any change in
climate, either locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
of direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh water?
b.
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?
C.
Alterations to -the course or flow
✓
of flood waters?
d.
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
e.
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited. -
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
f.
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
g.
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, ether throuah direct additions
or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h.
Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
/
✓
water supplies?
.F
5.
M
7_
Yes Maybe No
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such'as flooding
or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants
into an area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
Animal Life, Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlij'_-_ habitat?
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a_ Increases in existing noise levels?
b_ Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
NO
Yes Maybe No
g. Land Use. Will the proposal result in
a substantial -alteration of the present
or planned land use of an area?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals
or radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
b. possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. population. will the proposal alter
the location, distribution,.density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result -in:
a. Generation of s43.bstantial add?tional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects.on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
C. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
v/
J
Yes Maybe No
e.
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
/
air traffic?
f.
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
.
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. Public services. Will the proposal have
an
effect upon, or result in a need for new
or
altered governmental services in'any of
the following areas:
a.
Fire protection?
✓
b.
Police protection?
✓
C.
Schools?
✓
d.
Parks or other recreational facilities?
e.
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? ..
✓
✓
f.
Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of /
energy? ✓
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a
need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a.
Power or natural gas?
b.
Conmunica `ions systems-? _
✓
c_
Water? __
d.
Sewer or septic tanks?
e.
Storm water drainage?
f.
Solid waste and disposal?
V/
17 .
Kim
20.
21.
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Solid Waste. Will the proposal create
additional solid waste requiring disposal
by the City?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of
a prehistoric or historic archaeological
site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric -or historic building,
structure, or object?
C. Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical charge which
would unique ethnic cultural
values?
d.. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
V//
22.
Yes Maybe No
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment
substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory? _
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future).
C. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively con-
siderable? (A project may impact•on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small,. but
where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
IV. Determination
(To be completed by the Dead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation?:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a
significant effect on the environme�, and a /
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepares. �/
I find that although the proposed project could have
a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measure described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL
BE PREPARED
I find the proposed project MAY have a significanteffect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ORT
is required.
Date S gnatu
PART III - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
EXHIBIT A
INITIAL STUDY RESPONSES
FOR
CODE AMENDMENT 92-005
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Smart SMR of California, Inc., requests amendments
to standards of the City of Tustin Zoning Code regulating the
Planned Industrial and Industrial Districts, and to Planned
Community Regulations providing development standards for the
City's two largest industrial complexes.
The proposed amendments will allow antennas operated for uses that
have not been granted a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity by the Public Utilities Commission of the •State of
California to be installed in the planned industrial and industrial
districts, and industrial planned communities, either as permitted
uses or conditionally permitted uses. If antennas are entirely
screened from view from any public right of way, such as those
concealed by a parapet wall or designed to be within a building
ill, they will be considered permitted uses. Antennas not
atirely screened from view will be subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by the Tustin Planning Commission.
All -proposals for antennas will be subject to the City's Design
Review process.
No specific sites for the antennas have been selected. However,
the CUP process requires that the Planning Commission make findings
that the use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals,
comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or -working in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. In addition,
specific development criteria for antenna uses has been included in
the amendments.
1. EARTH
Items A, B, C, D, E, F and G - "No": The code amendment will
not result in changes to existing earth conditions, topography
or ground features. The amendment is for a change of land use
regulations only; no development is associated with the
proposal. However as a result of the amendment, the
subsequent development of antennas may occur.
Sources: Submitted Application
City of Tustin Municipal Code
Mitigation/Monitorinq.Required: None required. Any impacts
related to miner grading activity for the construction of
footings and/or foundations required for specific antenna
Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment -92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 2
facilities will be addressed under separate CEQA review.
2. AIR
Items A, B and C - "No": Based on review of AQMD standards
for preparing Environmental Impact Reports, this project will
not result in any degradation to the existing air quality.
Sources: Submitted Application
City of Tustin Municipal Code
AQMD Standards
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Any
possibility of dust generated by future construction activity
will be evaluated and, 'if necessary, mitigated during the
review of that specific development proposal.
3. WATER
Items A through I - "No": The proposed code amendment will
allow an, additional minor land use in industrial areas; it
will not result in any changes to any existing water
conditions.
Sources: Submitted Application
City of Tustin Municipal -Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Specific
proposals for future development will be evaluated on a case-
by-case basis. Any activities which increase in runoff flows
or storm water movement will be assessed with individual
installation proposals.
4. PLANT LIFE
Items A, B, C and D - "No": It is anticipated that future
antenna sites will be associated with existing development.
It is unlikely that any antenna installations resulting from
the code amendment will result in negative effects to plant
life.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. There are no
,.:.xhibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 3
significant environmental impacts created by the proposed
project. Any applicable mitigation measures related to plant
life identified during the future review of individual
projects will be recommended for implementation.
5. ANIMAL LIFE
Items A through D - "No": The proposed amendment will not
result in adverse impacts to animal life. Future facilities
resulting from the proposed code amendment will be evaluated
on a case-by-case basis.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. No
significant environmental impacts will be created by the
proposal. Any mitigation measures identified during
subsequent evaluations, including revegetation of the specific
antenna sites, will be incorporated into project requirements
on a project -by -project basis. .
6. NOISE
Items A and B - "Maybe": The proposed code amendment itself
will not result in any degradation of existing noise levels.
However, development may occur as a result of the amendment
which could create short-term construction noise impacts. It
is not known if subsequent development will result _in
residents or others being exposed to severe noise levels
because specific antenna types or locations have not been
proposed. The types of antennas used by the proponent
utilize 120'V electricity, which is considered low voltage. No
Noise is emitted from those antennas. Nevertheless, the code
amendment would allow other types of antennas which may emit
"humming" or other sounds.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Ione required at this time.
Any construction work resulting from the code amendment must
meet standards of the City's Noise Ordinance, which contains
specific requirements recarding construction noise. In
Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 4
addition, each specific antenna site and type proposed
will be evaluated on an individual basis The.potential to
create noise and impact residents or others will be determined
at that time.
7. LIGHT AND GLARE
"Maybe": The code amendment itself will not produce new light
or glare. No specific antenna types or locations are proposed
and it is unknown if any antennas installed as a result of the
amendment will be illuminated. Each subsequent request for an
antenna installation will be evaluated individually. If
warranted, conditions of approval will require applicants to
send notice to the Federal Aviation Administration prior to
the construction of an antenna support structure to determine
if illumination is necessary.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required at this time.
During the review of each individual antenna. proposal, any
mitigation measures found necessary will be incorporated into
the project design or included as conditions of approval.
8. LAND USE
"Maybe": The proposal will not result in a substantial
alteration of present or planned land uses; however, the code
amendment will allow an additional minor accessory -type use in
existing industrial areas. Any subsequent installation of
antennas will most likely occur_ on land parcels with existing
indust--rial buildings, or in conjunction with the future
development of such buildings, and may result in a mix of uses
on each site. Antennas completely screened from view from any
public right-of-ways will be allowed as permitted uses; those
antennas visable from public right-of-ways, such as mast or
mono -pole antennas, will require approval of a Conditional Use
Permit by the Planning Commission. Each proposal will be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis. No additional or altered
land use impacts are anticipated.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
hibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 5
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Adherence to
and compliance with provisions of the Tustin City Code and
Planned Community District regulations, and the City's Design
Review and Conditional Use Permit processes, will ensure that
any development proposed as a result of the code amendment
will be compatible with existing and planned land uses.
9. NATURAL RESOURCES
Items A and B - "No": The code amendment, an administrative
change in land use regulations, will not require significant
quantities of natural or non-renewable resources.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code .
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required at this time.
Each individual proposal for an antenna installation will be
evaluated separately. Any appropriate mitigation measures will be
included in conditions of approval for the project.
10. RISK OF UPSET
Items A and B - "No": The proposal will not increase risk of
upset to the City as it only involves changes in land use
regulations. The installation of antennas, as permitted or
conditionally permitted by the proposed revisions, will
require measures to mitigate any potential risk of upset.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Moni-toring Required:_ None required at. this time.
11. POPULATION
"No": The proposed code amendment will not increase or
decrease the population of the City.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required.
Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 6 '
12. HOUSING
"No": The proposed code amendment will not create a need for
additional housing. No dwelling units are proposed in
conjunction with the proposal.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required.
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Items A through F - "No": The code amendment will not result
in additional vehicular movement or demand for new parking.
There will not be substantial impacts on existing
transportation systems or present circulation patterns.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
MitigationlMonitoring Required: None required. Antenna
installations subsequent to the approval of the code amendment
may generate temporary construction traffic in the vicinity of
individual sites. However, each antenna location will be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis and any mitigation measures
found necessary at that time will be included as conditions of
approval.
14. PUBLIC SERVICES
Items A. throuc� F - "No": The proposal will not have an
impact on or resul in a:i increased demand for or alter any
public service. The proposal will allow an additional minor
lard use of unmanned facilities in existing industrial areas.
Fire and police services, school Facilities, parks and roads
will all be unaffected by the code amendment.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Coda
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required.
_ichibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 7
15. ENERGY
Items A and B - "Yes": The code amendment will not increase
the demand for or consumption of energy. However, the
subsequent installation of antennas will require minor amounts
of fuel and energy; the actual operation of the antennas may
also require small quantities. Nevertheless, energy needs
will not be substantial and the development of new sources of
energy will not be required.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. Any future
construction associated with the installations of antennas
must comply with the Energy Conservation Standards set forth
in Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. Mitigation
measures related to energy, as 'applicable, will be
incorporated into individual antenna projects, or included as
conditions of approval.
16. UTILITIES
Items A, and C through F - "No'l The proposal will not
increase the demand for traditional public utilities, such as
water, natural gas, storm drains or sewers.
Item B - "Maybe": The proposed amendment to the Tustin Zoning
Code and Planned Community District regulations will not, in
itself, impact utility systems. However, after the amendment
is adopted, it is likely that some or all. of the antennas
installed will be for co:rinunica.tion purposes including the
relatively new technologies of cellular telephone, two-way
radio, and land mobile radio systems. It is possible, although
unlikely, that existing traditional communication systems will
be adversely impacted by the proposal. The Federal
Communications Commission closely monitors the effects that
the myriad of communication systems have on each other and
ensures that one system will not interfere with another.
Sources: Submitted Application
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/ Monitoring Required: None required_ Each antenna
installation facilitated b%- the code amendment will require
Exhibit A - Initial Study Responses
Code Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 8
separate review and approval of the Community Development
Department or Planning Commission. Any mitigation measures
identified during those reviews will be incorporated into the
project plans or required by conditionsoff approvalconducts its hewn
the Federal Communication commission
monitoring and requires corrective action if one communication
system interfers with.another.
17. HUMAN HEALTH
Items A and B - "Maybe": The proposed code amendment may
create new health hazards for those living or working in the
vicinity. While antennas utilized by the applicant are
considered low voltage (120V) , and therefore, pose few health
risks, there may be other antenna types proposed in the future
which do have health risks, such as noise (humming).
Each specific antenna type and location will be evaluated on
an individual basis to determine associated health risks.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code -
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required at this time.
Any potential risk to human health identified in subsequent
reviews of antenna installations facilitated by the amendment
will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Appropriate
mitigation measures will be_ incorporated into the project
design or included as conditions of approval.
18. SOLID WASTE
Ho�� : The cede amendment will not create additional solid
waste.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required.
19. AESTHETICS
"Maybe": The amendment to the zoning code and Planned
Community District regulations will not impact any
htscenic
vista or view. However, antenna installations g
�,hibit A - Initial Study Responses
:ode Amendment 92-005
September 21, 1992
Page 9
by the new standards and criteria may result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site from public right-of-way
views. Every antenna will be subject to the City's design
review and/or conditional use permit process. One aspect of
that review will be to ensure that antennas are designed to be
as compatible with surrounding properties as feasible.
Sources: Submitted Plans
Tustin City Code
MitigationfMonitoring Required: Subsequent to the proposed
code amendment, any requests for antenna installations will be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Aesthetic factors such as
proximity to other uses, screening and color will be
considered. All applicable mitigation measures will be
included into individual project designs or as conditions of
(10� approval. In addition, any antenna visible from a public
', right-of-way will require a Conditional Use Permit. To
approve a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must
determine that the establishment, maintenance or operation of
the use applied for will, under the circumstances of the
particular case, will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use,
and that it will be injurious or detrimental to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the
City.
20. RECREATION
"No": The proposal will not create a need for additional
recreational services or impact existing services.
Scurces :. Submitted Plans
1ustin City Code
Mitigation/Monitorin Rectuired: None required.
21. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Items A through D - "No": The code amendment will not result
N:
in the alteration or destruction of archaeological sites and
historic buildings, or cause a physical change which will
affect cultural values.
Microwave Antennas, 2.. -2 G•-_
GPLS-21 A, 8 It (2.4 m) Grid Antenna with Integral Vertical
Tower Mount
Wide Range of Performance Levels
offered as standard products for cost efficient system design. V1
Low VSWR Feeds
enable highest capacity, low error rate performance and high-
est revenue potential.
Unpressurized Antennas
-F"-series antennas are designed for high reliability without
need of pressurization. This eliminates the cost of pressuriza-
tion equipment and reduces maintenance costs.
Outstanding Radiation Characteristics
of UHP and UHX ultra high performance antennas offer great
flexibility in planning of microwave routes. Allows maximum
RF channel expansion. Avoids the cost of remotely terminat-
ing a route. Pattern envelopes meet regulations required by
many countries. .
System Capability
Andrew can provide eornplete site construction, -including tow-
ers, equipment shelters, transmission lines. pressurization
equipment. civil work and all the services necessary to. pro-
vide you with a turnkey microwave system. Free up your time
and have a single point of responsibility.
U.S. FCC Pattern Compliance is indicated in the tables.
Vertical Tower Mount is included with all antennas. See
pages 95 and 96 for further information.
Pressurization. Single polarized air -dielectric feeds are pres-
surizable to 101blin2 (70 kPa). Dual polarized feeds are pres-
surizable to 3 IWm2 (20 kPa). F Series unpressurized feeds are
foam filled and eliminate the need for pressurization equip-
ment.
Termination Load for unused port of dual polarized an-
tenna. 1.7-2.3 GHz.
Flange Type 7/8" EIA, 50 ohm ............ Type 43734
To Order. Specify Antenna Type Number. Refer to page 53
for general ordering information.
Further Information. For general information on micro-
wave ar-tennas see rages 40-53. For informatiop on
applications and related products see the index on page 39.
"�
2.1 - 2.2 GHz Antennas Electrical Characteristics
Cross F/B VSWR
Frequency Input Type Diameter U.S.FCC Gain, dBi Beamwidth Pol. Ratio max.
GHz Flanges Number tt (m) Category$ Bottom Mid -Band Top Degrees Disc., dB dB (R.L., dB)
Ultra Hinh Perlormance Antenna, Air Dielectric - TEGLARD Long Life Radome Included
2-' 2.2
7/8" EIA
UHP8-21
8(2.4)
A
31.9
32.1
32.3
4.2
32
33
61
64
1. (
1.08(2 8-38-3 )
Sngle
50 ohm
UHP10-21
10(3,0)
A
33.7
33.9
34.0
3.6
32
65
t (28-31
c_-ianzed
UHP12-21
12(3-7)
A
35.4
35.6
35.8
2.9
-OS
2 7 -2.2
71'8'" EIA
UHX8-21
8 (2.4)
A
31.9
32.1
32.3
4.2
30
32
58
62
1.10 (26.4)
t (26.4)
C al50
ohm
UHX10-21 A
10(3.01
A
33.8
34.0
34.2
3.6
32
67
.10
1.10 (2641
!arzeC
UHX12-21A
12 (3.7)
A
35.4
35.6
35.8
2.8
:,;so meet FCC Stanoards for Common Carne( Servico (Pan 21)
n n HCl CIPJ
Special -Purpose Mounts
The mounts listed in the table below are alternates to the T se-
ries tower mounts listed on page 96. While these are nor-
mally used with standard antennas, they can, in many cases,
also be used with shielded antennas. Contact Andrew for fur-
ther information.
To Order. Specify mount type number from the table below.
Also specify antenna "less standard mount" when ordering.
Ir Mounting Information
Type M10
Type HT6
Special -Purpose Mounts for Standard Antennas
Mount Type Number
Inch Metric Azimuth
Standard Standard For Use With Center Offset` Adjustment
Hardware
Elevation
Adjustment included
Hardware Antenna Size ft (m) in (mm) degrees
Degrees Side Strut
Horizontal Mounts
M10 M10M 4-10 (1.2-3.0) — —
±5 —
Vertical Tilt Mounts
VT613 VT6MB 4.6 (1.2...8) 5.4 (137) left" ±5 —5 to +50
VT10 VT10M 8. 10 (2.4. 3.0) 8 (200) ±5 —5 to +50 1
HT6 HT6M 4. 6 (1.2...8) — 360 0 to ±50
HT10 HT10M 8.10 (2.4. 3.0) — 360 0 to ±50 —
'With respect to the mounting pipe. viewed from the rear of in.
antenna. Can be reversed by inverting the mount or antenna.
"Can be offset right or left without inverting the mount or antenna. Q ��
ANDREW 97
4.0
WOODEN MAST
Ela.
time
4.0
time
L' r.
MA
�-1 r ' .fes... _ s�.•
ir�w.� ..r•.�.Y
! G
e.a�dr
47.
ow
0' %i�atl✓
tz
3
Vol
�-1 r ' .fes... _ s�.•
ir�w.� ..r•.�.Y
! G
e.a�dr
47.
ow
0' %i�atl✓
tz
3
Vol
Andrew offers a complete range of custom-designed mono-
poles, platforms and accessories to meet your cellular or
telecommunication needs.
Compared with other tower types, monopoles have minimum
land requirements and are most aesthetically pleasing to local
zoning boards.
Standard Features
Optimum Design. Andrew monopoles are designed using a
computer analysis program which considers wind. ice and
antenna loading and the effects on member stress and displace-
ments. The displacement of the tower is determined and used
to calculate monopole twist and sway. All monopoles are
designed in accordance with EIAMA-222-E and local codes
where applicable.
Hot Dip, Galvanized and Certified Structural Steel.
Steel for monopoles is purchased directly from U.S. mills. All
steel is physically and chemically certified to assure quality
fabrication.
Foundation Designs. Monopole foundations are custom
designed using a customer supplied soil analysis. The stan-
dard foundation is a spread footing and pier. For unusual soil
conditions. Andrew also offers non -conventional foundations
such as pilings, rock anchorage, and drilled caissons. All work
is supervised by professional engineers. Professional engineer-
ing certification for all U.S. states is available for a nominal
charge to assist in obtaining zoning variances or construction
permits.
Ladder Bracket Climbing Devices. Monopoles include
ladder brackets and removable ladder steps that run the full
length of the shaft for climbing purposes. Cable type safety
.-limbs are also available for the ladder brackets to ensure safe
:limbing.
U.S. FAA Requirements. Enamel paint is available for
sowers that require painting under FAA regulations. Refer to
rages 483-484 for information on monopole light systems and
be Andrew ALC Light Controller.
Optional Features
:ellulai Platforms. Cellular platforms support omni and
ectorized antennas as described on pages 478-479. Andrew
)latforms are AMP type and are adaptable to monopoles with
In A.T.T. flange. Platforms are offered for 120.90. and 60
legree sectorization.
:ellular Radomes. 'Thermoform radomes for three and four
.ided platforms enhance aesthetic appearance. Sky Blue is the
tandard color.
)own -Tilt Brackets. Mechanical brackets down -tilt cellular
intennas up to 20' in t' increments and rotate antennas 15' in
increments for controlling and adjusting the seciorized cell
.rea.
Monopoles
The monopole is ideal for cellular and telecommunication
applications having minimum land requirements. Cellular platform:
and pipe mounts allow easy attachment of cellular and microwav;
antennas.
*epj M a T I e..*
ANDREW
I: :•.Yti= �•:•r•,•r �j,Cjj �7:••7r1V•. a •.,,��
�•, . t,a•'�+�_�•.?.•e�;y�a�!�•�.��:1-�""'w:.z?�Wa� �:137�rn�,fta1 4�s�,�� 'tr"� .Dr ,'�•`•,:i �:��
,../a ►f. + .. t•..-•�:'a _ '^'� � 1. '.,. a•d '< •rt�Cy ,.+. .a.,r'r4 +•.is`T°:
wdwplsem...- �."".�"�`��.�A"� �`,,,•',�`•�1{- - .sL.+w:.t`-' • - _-;
V ~ter .��4wr., .y •'�•r1 'T;�•r ���(4 .'"": `��'• - ;+�Y;a. J'v^.- j�l
L ..•i � . Z 1y - - _ • L.a•:1 • i•w-amu :"�--3•f -:� �y`,i'. i•.•.. , � �, •-
`' -'r�-= '�'^d ►tea-�."'��'""`'"r "'-i-...,..-.,:..+wr0"-��
771
/
it _� • •� ./�I' •; w'•....
Zd
•�. - moi'
TL
-, �'.,::.a T''•+/,.ti•y�; • -�. _ _ _ ��� is 07•. ,'�- '_�la-S.?. .'
�:..:JL •l y�i .L 3:ti� leiV _� _•,n• .1 r�•`'i.!. �-i Jt'� Cr :!i!` `!,
.•�S•.•'i. `:•�„%+f`+'�"y.}�"_: `•` _ .:•• r ��• v_ � � :..� � ',miff-
••�.�.. � .fes:•.^• �� '- s-��.~�.'"� 3��� � �' �•�f. -\
4i0T-I�mli\r7iiG
dw
•�••��
V �. ..�. :rte.! :r`• .. - .Y. .►..,
,��
,y: „e."':. •�r7`�:.....r•... '•- •. �/ 1-�... •,yl,
•1
day.
�•, . t,a•'�+�_�•.?.•e�;y�a�!�•�.��:1-�""'w:.z?�Wa� �:137�rn�,fta1 4�s�,�� 'tr"� .Dr ,'�•`•,:i �:��
,../a ►f. + .. t•..-•�:'a _ '^'� � 1. '.,. a•d '< •rt�Cy ,.+. .a.,r'r4 +•.is`T°:
wdwplsem...- �."".�"�`��.�A"� �`,,,•',�`•�1{- - .sL.+w:.t`-' • - _-;
V ~ter .��4wr., .y •'�•r1 'T;�•r ���(4 .'"": `��'• - ;+�Y;a. J'v^.- j�l
L ..•i � . Z 1y - - _ • L.a•:1 • i•w-amu :"�--3•f -:� �y`,i'. i•.•.. , � �, •-
`' -'r�-= '�'^d ►tea-�."'��'""`'"r "'-i-...,..-.,:..+wr0"-��
771
/
it _� • •� ./�I' •; w'•....
Zd
•�. - moi'
TL
-, �'.,::.a T''•+/,.ti•y�; • -�. _ _ _ ��� is 07•. ,'�- '_�la-S.?. .'
�:..:JL •l y�i .L 3:ti� leiV _� _•,n• .1 r�•`'i.!. �-i Jt'� Cr :!i!` `!,
.•�S•.•'i. `:•�„%+f`+'�"y.}�"_: `•` _ .:•• r ��• v_ � � :..� � ',miff-
••�.�.. � .fes:•.^• �� '- s-��.~�.'"� 3��� � �' �•�f. -\
4i0T-I�mli\r7iiG
I
� rl'. I �
IV"
X-1
•,�v�-J1 -.��F.,sQ.+Y .yj�:.Yai.r} rF,Y .. ...1 1. �•� .` 7�,
'���� ••rr`�,�� ^� l��I � � . � � as •� `ern �'�- t-� i'�ir f - h � •t� • ' `
r•C•>ia i `r , i'+a•: 'r ,,.,,,7.•=-'•1 \t..'S+'`Y �?} .! �> y :t-• N . v."^+. � � , ; . .,j .
t. i�tty.r~�'r -✓ :c� ,.� vtiL, � `i t r� � `�. �•?; :,al' * .. �• - . ,�t r 4r
`''.s- r�`�t' 3 `ll .117:vy a � � � � . `;,i a , � . • e a ^ ,
r( �/••c. r }^� ,c! re:, 'j T-wi '" _ _tea rY• r•! ��. - _ ray dpl.
L'2��"c ti�•:'Sze�.�'rt�c• '~:�.-s rC ,.�{,, �.z',i � :_„_.. ' � ..; •,. ..
Mow
fie
Ar to
kz- W!O�
lbb
�}, w,C�•: �;fir n. � � o.n ! �;�y� ' - ti» r rel. }�•` � J �•' .+ a,
7 -� i b � r ••i
�� �1`1�5: �„„J e ".tip- .� r �. .►�>.. CC •• / ,� v +
,':/ : �-r{.+''••1 ri fid- ^ C ''• � � • J r: ' •
_ % 1. l r -Y rK .•'.. "� ! • `_ •'moi • � �•
il• .f' ` 1. y ..s ! _ ) - i' + , • �, ��' �+
�,,. 1'�i` f��rr r rr. r . a• '`•`-'r�,c. .'!_. .� .•� ,� ••Sf•`_ s
M'�,k� ��r'•'�'aS�, �- • Y .: n `- .v.aero•.aw r. � � .� ���w.r a • � I'j j . I '
j 'qte=}a f+ -+:i •>.i^: `: _ 3- ..c• > ~r �r���� r _
t..r."^ ��tu-�^axe cs r � SKl•-4 .....�w.i. • •t � � � 1: � y _
�-'1 ,{may.• ,• - ! i• _ .5
YT I ' �••Jl' - ' � 7� J
i
�%''�,.[� Yi; k Z'� fie. Y .',,'. - [' �_�_ -� 7 • � � r. !► ! ..:
• � •!•..• • .t ✓ .•: •:.I ! � L•• V � �• �. •••. .�• ti ' i. s+'• •... •. fir• �.1
+ •: _~;' ;-ma'''r • . ,., .• .. :-• � • � -• • ' '' • ' . , �
s
Rt. . � moi► .. • ; � t �• � � ••-
Tf
- r•' ���• _- •.•• . '��ra� � S'v • r. ;� :.rr ) -.�. � -t �'ti � aS-�.•�►�<f e1i•
j�. 2
� ��>�•� �� �� r�'3 fir:
•-
•�R
•
_�_:.
.� •j �i ���^�^'vrte_
.f%.. CYi'%1 f7".: � .�ti''
• t
. •fes
`� C•.gip y-'�� � ,Z,l tt':.
`��''�,�
.'i.'�.' •
i ! �, •
}
t f�.16
?rf 'J""^./i {�cR♦a ��✓ S.1i,+it-�'. ��4� �/:�
•/�f •'♦
. •, `
•,�v�-J1 -.��F.,sQ.+Y .yj�:.Yai.r} rF,Y .. ...1 1. �•� .` 7�,
'���� ••rr`�,�� ^� l��I � � . � � as •� `ern �'�- t-� i'�ir f - h � •t� • ' `
r•C•>ia i `r , i'+a•: 'r ,,.,,,7.•=-'•1 \t..'S+'`Y �?} .! �> y :t-• N . v."^+. � � , ; . .,j .
t. i�tty.r~�'r -✓ :c� ,.� vtiL, � `i t r� � `�. �•?; :,al' * .. �• - . ,�t r 4r
`''.s- r�`�t' 3 `ll .117:vy a � � � � . `;,i a , � . • e a ^ ,
r( �/••c. r }^� ,c! re:, 'j T-wi '" _ _tea rY• r•! ��. - _ ray dpl.
L'2��"c ti�•:'Sze�.�'rt�c• '~:�.-s rC ,.�{,, �.z',i � :_„_.. ' � ..; •,. ..
Mow
fie
Ar to
kz- W!O�
lbb
�}, w,C�•: �;fir n. � � o.n ! �;�y� ' - ti» r rel. }�•` � J �•' .+ a,
7 -� i b � r ••i
�� �1`1�5: �„„J e ".tip- .� r �. .►�>.. CC •• / ,� v +
,':/ : �-r{.+''••1 ri fid- ^ C ''• � � • J r: ' •
_ % 1. l r -Y rK .•'.. "� ! • `_ •'moi • � �•
il• .f' ` 1. y ..s ! _ ) - i' + , • �, ��' �+
�,,. 1'�i` f��rr r rr. r . a• '`•`-'r�,c. .'!_. .� .•� ,� ••Sf•`_ s
M'�,k� ��r'•'�'aS�, �- • Y .: n `- .v.aero•.aw r. � � .� ���w.r a • � I'j j . I '
j 'qte=}a f+ -+:i •>.i^: `: _ 3- ..c• > ~r �r���� r _
t..r."^ ��tu-�^axe cs r � SKl•-4 .....�w.i. • •t � � � 1: � y _
�-'1 ,{may.• ,• - ! i• _ .5
YT I ' �••Jl' - ' � 7� J
i
�%''�,.[� Yi; k Z'� fie. Y .',,'. - [' �_�_ -� 7 • � � r. !► ! ..:
• � •!•..• • .t ✓ .•: •:.I ! � L•• V � �• �. •••. .�• ti ' i. s+'• •... •. fir• �.1
+ •: _~;' ;-ma'''r • . ,., .• .. :-• � • � -• • ' '' • ' . , �
s
Rt. . � moi► .. • ; � t �• � � ••-
Tf
- r•' ���• _- •.•• . '��ra� � S'v • r. ;� :.rr ) -.�. � -t �'ti � aS-�.•�►�<f e1i•
lit
;,x sem_. .c„��." •�`
"•i �'�a�;^; `yam: µ .:. 4
mow.. .�
_4"•}, -�!>• •= • �
=-�- �.� �:.
•�f
r t 1t}
t : s ♦ • y
R KS � i.JL
1•?'M�..O�•
fM f
-ten •: '
L•s
� fy�F•��I.J
>I
YJ •;
•. . •'+�•
� Irl`.•. 1
J J✓ •r ei air "
This 24 in (610 mm) face width tower is ideal for use in cellu-
lar radio fixed station applications and can meet the require-
ments of microwave systems supporting up to four 8 ft
(2.4 m) diameter shielded antennas.
Bending moments caused by bolt connection eccentricities
are eliminated with the use of formed diagonal members in
X -braced sections. These bracing components contribute
greatly to the rigidity of the tower column.
Integrated transmission line supports carry up to seven runs of
HELIAX® elliptical waveguide or coaxial cable per tower
face. Additional runs can be accommodated.
24-
(610 mm)
1s"
(157 mm)
20'
(6.019 m)
1
I
I
,424 Diagonal
Braced System
Waveguide support
members replace
diagonals to
provide support
at 30" (760 mm)
intervals
30 "
30"
(760 mm) 15-
1 (380 mm)
20-
(6.09 m)
7.25
(184 mm)
•;mow.
The R24 is ideal for cellular applications, and is capable of sup-
porting loads required for medium -density microwave systerns.
Tower shown includes built-in seven -hole feeder support ladder
and cellular platform.
R24 X -Braced Section ��ago
Braced Sectionion
Bayed I�rV4ic�--fu�PMANDREW
-I (N 1
C
R
V
19
- •� (fin A %. �q 9\'0►� \ `• 9
,ZR 3 � \ .r�• 'AF 4�-�. s ,/�' .tis •�y' /•� �
o ♦ a `Cyo
R3
VO
/ 19SO
� '9
PD
q qr ♦ ��o ti,�� q .
r
ATTACHMENT B
:F�o so 69�
>�- Is,
.�� 9 •. A
r
a-40
A
41t-
\4.�� � i:� ` � ,� 9 �.% •'yip/ .: ' . /
%`e �� �� �. P ti
•�'v't /� •9th • , yQ i
t, ) _ P-•too / �� • �, � , \ �
`vomit'
�, ISS \ '. S ,►_
ov
Ae
JP / j f' ih_• st vq
Q-
61
/ '•�� to � � -� r C
♦�y 9 S �E' ` p
C�406
47
\fidefA?
3 L / 431,11Z i
! w