Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 1982 06 07 MlNUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way JUne 7, 1982 Io CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 3:43 p.m. TTo ROLL CALL Council~ersons Present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli Councilpersons Absent: None Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director Ronald Nault, Finance Director Royleen White, Community Services Director Approximately 10 in the audience III. PROCLAMATION 1. "PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH" Mayor Edgar read and presented to Royleen White, Director of Community Services for the City of TGstin, a proclamation proclaiming the month of June, 1982, as "Parks and Recreation Month." 84 IV. PUBLIC CONCERNS- None V. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Greinke asked that Item No. 2 be removed from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to approve the Consent Calendar except for Item No. 2. Carried 5-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- May 17, 1982 3. UNIFORM RENTAL AND LAUNDRY SERVICE AGREEMENT Authorize the Mayor to sign and implement the subject agree- ment for uniform service and laundry as reconunended by the Engineering Department. 45 4. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF KEITH MURPHY; DATE OF LOSS: 12-5-81, DATE FILED: 3--11--82; AND CLAIM NO. 82-8 Deny claim of Keith Murphy as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 5. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF BARBARA JO GILBERT; DATE OF LOSS: 1--2-82; DATE FILED: 4--9-82; AND CLAIM NO. 82-12 Deny claim of Barbara Jo Gilbert as recommended by the City Attorney · 40 6. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF ARTHUR L. DAVIS; DATE OF LOSS: 4-21-82; DATE FILED 4-23-82; AND CLAIM NO. 82-14 Deny claim of Arthur L. Davis as recommended by the City Attorney · 40 7. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF ADELLA M. BAKER; DATE OF LOSS 4-21-82; DATE FILED= 4-30-82; AND CLAIM NO. 82-15 Deny claim of Adella M. Baker as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 8. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF BARBARA L. FRAIM; DATE OF LOSS= 4-14-82; DATE FILED 4-30-82; AND CLAIM NO. 82-16 Deny claim of Barbara L. Fraim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2, 6-7-82 9. RESOLUTION NO. 82-38- A Resolution of the City Council of the City of T~stin, California, APpROVING ~E ~PLI~TION ~R G~T ~DS ~DER ~E ROBERTI-Z'BE~ U~ OPt-SPACE ~D MC~ATION PROG~ Adoption of Resolution No. 82-38 as recomended by the Director of ~ity Services. 45 10. RESOLUTION NO. 82-39- A Resolution of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 10300 (14882-14942 __ NewPORT Avenue) Adoption of Resolution No. 82-39 as reco~ended by ~e C~ m~ity Development Department- 99 11. RESOLUTION NO. 82-40 - A Resolution of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1981-82 HANDICAPPED RAMP CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Adoption of Resolution No. 82-40 as reco~ended by ~e Engi- neering Department. 92 12. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED PARKING - 15910 PASADENA AVENUE Authorize the installation of signing to restrict on-street parking on the easterly side of Pasade~ Avenue adjacent to 15910 Pasadena Avenue ~d ~at warnings ~ issued in lieu of citations for the first 30 days after the si~ installation. 75 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS in ~e ~o~t of $471,685.53 RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL ~o~t of $93,575.13 50 Co~cilman Greinke's concern was ~out ~y ~ssible conflict of interest. He is waiting for a ~itten decision. His business services many accosts in ~stin and it is difficult to kn~ who all of ~em are. Also his monthly ~nse allowance ~at is -- listed on Page 5 of the warrants has the name of his business which should not ~ listed. It was mved b~ Hoesterse, seconded by Kennedy, to approve Item No. 2 of the Consent Calendar. Carried 4-0, Greinke abstained. VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - None VII. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION - None VIII · OLD BUSINESS 1. ARCADES-MECHANISM FOR REVIEW AND PLANNING AGENCY GUIDELINES Following consideration of the report dated J~e 7, ~982, pr~ pared by the Co~ity Development Director, it was moved b~ Kennedy, seconded bX Saltarelli, that Arcades shall be subject to review and action ~der a use ~rmit proced~e by ~e Plan- ning Agency only and that the guidelines ~ used for infomation for ~e public. Carried ~0. 81 IX.NEW BUSINESS 1. AUTHORIZATION TO RE-ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR IRVINE BLVD. FAU PROJECT M-M023(2) RESOLUTION NO. 82-43- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICAITONS FOR IRVINE BLVD. FAU PROJECT M-M023 (2) AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS In response to Co~cilman Saltarelli*s question, ~e City ~gi- neer responded that this total contract includes traffic signal control and ~e median installation with minimal landscaping. ~e medians will be entirely paved except in the vicinity of the trees and within ~at vicinity there will be a square of approx~ately 14' by 14' low maintenance gro~d cover. Co~cihan Saltarelli suggested modifying this contract to include replacing grass with st~d concrete in the present islands from Newport Avenue to Prospect. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3, 6-7-82 Bob Ledendecker said that we were going to do the area westerly on Irvine where we are putting in two left turn pockets under the bid as a special negotiated item. If Council desires to expand this further, he suggested that once we receive the bid, we can come back with costs on a street by street basis. It was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey, to reject all bids for subject project which were received on May 10, 1982, and to pass and adopt Resolution No. 82-43. Motion carried 5-0. 95 2, SANTA ANA TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR STUDY, STAGE II ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT This item is a recap of the Stage 2 Alternatives Analysis of the Santa And Transportation Corridor Study. When the study was initiated, the freeway was proposed to be widened to 8 lanes to a medium standard. It would not have the 30' median between the two directions of travel or the full 15' of side clearance to structures but they would attempt to place the 8 lanes as much as possible within the existing right of way, working On reduced side clearances to have the most minimal impact on the communities. Since that t/me the Orange County Traffic Commission has suggested widening the freeway to 10 lanes to a full standard with 5 lanes in each direction. This would have a large impact on the community. In reviewing this, staff has 3 major concerns: l) A Clarification should be made as to whether the Foothill and Eastern Corridor studies have been considered concurrently with the SATC Study and, if they have not been, perhaps the projected needs within the SATC can be down-scoped; 2) Widening of the I-5 Freeway to eight or ten lanes at medium or full standards will greatly impact Tustin with respect to right of way requirements. A substantial amount of housing units will be removed from the community along with many commercial and industrial buildings which will have an adverse economic impact to the City; and 3) Any elevated rail and busway alternatives within the transit element would effect the community with respect to noise and visual/quality aesthetics. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to authorize staff to forward the City's concerns regarding the Santa Ana Transportation Corridor Study as outlined in items No. 1~ 2 and 3 of the staff report dated June 1, 1982, to the Orange County Transportation Commission and the Orange County Transit District. Carried 5-0. In response to Mayor Edgar's concerns about lack of landscaping and beautification of the freeways that go through Tustin, Mr. Huston said that staff would transmit our concerns in a letter. Mrs. Kennedy reported that there are many weeds at the inter- change of 1-55 and I-5. 3o PARTICIPATION IN ORANGE COUNTY HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM RESOLUTION N0. 82-42 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Tustin, ADOPTING A HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Mike Brotemarkle, Community DeveIopment Director, reported that the Orange County Home Mortgage Finance Program presents an opportunity to make affordable units with low-cost financing available in Tustin, with no administrative burden on the City. The project is strictly to provide mortgages for people who wish to gain entry into the housing market. Mark Ainslee has indicated an interest in obtaining the money for his project at 1082-1102 San Juan. Any project that would be approved for these funds would have to obtain a Use Permit from the City of Tustin and conform to our standards. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, to adopt Resolution No. 82-42 and to authorize the Mayor to execute a cooperative agreement between the County of Orange and the City CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4, 6-7-82 of Tustin, subject to City Attorney approval. Carried 5-0. 81 X · REPORTS I. POTENTIAL WITHDRAWAL OF REQUESTS FOR CONDOMIMIUM CONVERSIONS AND IMPACT OF TENANT RELOCATION PLANS 43 Received and filed. 2. SETTING DATES IN BUDGET REVIEW SESSION A Workshop was set for June 17th at 4:00 p.m. Further workshops will be discussed at the evening meeting. 29 Xt. OTHER BUSINESS 1 · EXECUTIVE SESSION Mr. Huston reminded the Council of the Executive Session for labor negotiations following the afternoon meeting- 2. DRAINAGE PROBLEM ON FIRST STREET Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy reported a complaint about the standing water at the new condominiums on First Street. The City Engineer said he would look into it. 3 · COMMENDATION Councilman Greinke commended staff for resolution of a tree problem with one of his neighbors. 4. EXTENSION OF TIME BY COLUMBUS TUSTIN PARK TASK FORCE Mayor Edgar stated he was in agreement with extending the time for the Columbus T~stin Task Force but requested that they establish their own deadlines with periodic reports to the Council. 5 · UPDATING SIGNS Mayo~ Edgar asked staff to investigate updating the City's popu- lation on signs coming into the City and Councilman Hoesterey commented that the freeway signs showing the City limits should be updated. XXIo ADJOURNMENT- It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, to adjourn at 4:23 p.m. to an Executive Session for labor negotia- tions and thence to the 7: 30 p .m. meeting. Carried. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 Centennial Way Jnne 7, 1982 7:30 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Edgar at 8:23 p.m. ROLL CALL Councilpersons present: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Kennedy Councilpersons Absent: Saltarelli Others Present: james G. Rourke, City Attorney William A. Huston, City Manager Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director BOb Ledendecker, Director of public Works Charles Thayer, Chief of police RonNault, Finance Director Approximately 20 in the audience CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5, 6-7-82 III. PUBLIC CONCERNS - None N. PUBLIC HEARING 1. G"'~q~c~P~f., PLAN AMBNDM~qT 82-1 (A) ~U~ NO. 82-41 - A Resolution of the City Co~cil of ~e City of ~stin, ~PROVING ~ ~DM~T ~ ~E ~ND USE ~EM~T OF ~E G~E~ P~ FOR PROPERTIES AT 173~1 & 1734~ MC F~D~ S~ET ~e staff re~ort was given by ~ke Brotemarkle, ~ity Devel- opment Director, as contained in the staff re~rt dated J~e 7, 1982. ~is action ts not a final action, since this property is still zoned ~3. Co~cil will have to desi~ate a specific zone for the property at a later date. ~e P~lic Hearing was opened at 8:26 p.m. ~ere ~ing no co~ ments or objections, the P~lic Hearing was closed. It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterey, that Resolution No. 82-41 be passed and adopted. Carried ~0, saltarelli absent. 56 AGENDA ORDER V. CONSENT RESOLUTON NO. 82-39 - A Resolution of the City COUNCIL OF THE CALENDAR 10.3:3~ P.M. City of TUSTIN APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 10300 (14882-14942 3:30 P.M. NeWPort Avenue) MEETING Adoption of Resolution No. 82-39 as reckended by ~e C~ m~ity Development Depar~ent. Since ~ntative ~act Map 10300 was not authorized to s~divide for condomini~ p~ses ~til the 7:30 p.m. Planning Agency meeting this date, it was moved b~ Hoesrefer, seconded by Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. 82-39. Carried ~0, Saltarelli absent. 99 V. NEW BUSINESS 1. 1982-83 WATER CONSUMPTION RATE 7:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 82-44- A Resolution of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING WATER SERVICE RATES ~e City ~nager asked ~at this itM ~ continued in order for staff to provide additional info~tion on the overall rates. Co~cilman Hoesterey said that he Wuld like to have a study on the Water syst~ on a long tem basis, perhaps 3 to 5 year plan. It was moved b~ Grelnke, seconded b~ Edgar, to continue this it~ as a P~lic Hearing to the July 6th meeting. ~yor Pro Tem Kennedy asked if staff was not already working on a study in order to have a 3 to 5 year plan. ~. Muston, City ~nager, res~nded in the affirmative and he Mphasized ~at we need to ~ke a distinction between ~e long tem correction of the syst~ and a short tem of meeting cu~ rent obligations. We also need to begin some effort towards setting up a reserve to cover capital costs. Motion carried ~0, Saltarelli absent. 107 AGENDA ORDER X. REPORTS 2. SETTING DATES FOR BUDGET REVIEW SESSIONS 3:30 P.M. At ~e afternoon meeting, the Co~cil set J~e 17th at 4:00 p.m. as the t~e for a Budget workshop. Co~cil concurred to have a workshop on the s~e night as ~e Co~cil meeting of J~e 21st and if another workshop is necessary, it will be on J~e 22 n d · 29 VII. ADJOURNMENT ~ It was ~ved b~ Greinke, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjoin at 8:50 ~m. to a workshop on July ~7 at 4:00 p.m. and thence to the next reg~ar meeting on J~e 21, 1982. Carried. ~ GE~ ~YOR