HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB 4 ON-ST PKG 11-02-92NEW BUSINESS N0. 4
11-2-92
A G E N D
Ic m l nver- C ���,
ll
D ATE: NOVEMBER 21 1992
WILLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
TO:
ROBERT S. LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
FROM:
CITIZEN REQUEST FOR MODIFICATIONS
BETWEEN EL CAMINO REAL AND IC"
SUBJECT:ECT: RmREETCTIONS ALONG SIXTH STREET
RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is recommended that the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of
November 21 1992, authorize the following:
1. Deny the request to remove the two-houbetweenrElparking
Camino
restriction signs along Sixth Street
Real and "C" Street.
2. Maintain the existing red curb markings in the area of
the El Camino Real and Sixth Street intersection.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Don LeJuene, a resident of Tustin, has requested the Public
Works Department consider implementing the following changes to
existing parking restrictions in the E1 Camino Real/Sixth Street
area:
1. The removal of the two-hour parking zone along Sixth
Street between El Camino Real and "C" Street.
2. The reduction of red zone on Sixth Street at ethe
southwest corner and on the northeast corner of
Cam no Real and Sixth Street. El
interseclL__
DISCUSSION:
The two-hour parking restrictions along Sixth Street between E1
Camino Real and "C" Street were auth:r�zed by City Council action
t ff reports and their
in June, 1984. Attached are copies c_ two s a p
respective City Council minutes from the May 7, 1984 and June 18,
1984 City Council meetings regarding the parking issue in this area
of the City.
The existing red curb markings in the area of the E1 Camino
Real/Sixth Street intersection were also authorized by the City
Council in conjunction with the installation he traffic
ssignal
and
at the same intersection. A copy of t staff report
accompanying City Council minutes from the March 15, 1982 City
Council meeting, recommending the installation is attached.
red
ta h b markings
in the area around the subject intersection,
Citizen Request For Modifications
November 21 1992
Page 2
To On -Street Parking Restrictions
The subject red curb markings were recommended to improve
intersection visibility and to provide adequate turning radii for
vehicular traffic at this location.
The Engineering staff met with Mr. LeJuene on October 26, 1992 at
the subject location and discussed concerns regarding his requests.
Staff is concerned that removal of the time -restricted parking
zones may evoke similar volatile reactions from the residents in
this area that were experienced prior to the installations of the
parking restrictions. Also, by removing the time -restricted
parking zones, the opportunity would exist for the Tustin Garage to
return to the vehicle maintenance operations and practices that
preceded the Council direction to install the parking restrictions
that currently exist in this area.
CONCLUSIONS:
Upon review, the Engineering Division concludes the following:
1. The two-hour parking restrictions along Sixth Street
between E1 Camino Real and "C" Street should remain since
there has not been substantial changes in the area to
warrant a change in parking restrictions. This would
preclude a reoccurrence of concerns that were previously
expressed by area residents.
2. The E1 Camino Real/Sixth Street intersection has not been
physically modified since the original signal
installation in 1984. The City Council previously
directed the installations of the red curbs in
conjunction with the installation of a traffic signal at
this location. The same concerns that led to the
installation of the existing red curb markings in this
area in 1984 are still concerns today. Therefore, it is
recommended that the current red curb zones in this area
be maintained.
Robert S. Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Attachments
RSL:DA:kIb:PARKiNG1
Doug s R. Anderson
Transportation Engineer
!,GE''NDA, 'Y
6
TE: JUNE 13_, 1984
TO: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
0L f) GUS
`l. 1
-18-84
Inter --,Com
APPR0VE0 ICTAFE Ri r01V1P-` .0";DA-10N
FROM: BOB LEDENDECKER., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND
500 BLOCK SOUTH C STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City Council, at their meeting of June 18, 1984, authorize the
following:
1. Two hour parking tow away zone, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.-, Monday
through Saturday on Sixth St. between "B" Street and 150 + feet
easterly -of El Camino Real.
2. Install handicapped parking zones on westerly side of "C" Street
and the northerly side of B Street.
3. Install red zones at the intersections of Sixth and "C" Street, and
Si xth ' and "B" Street.
BACKGROUND:
On May 7., 1984, staff presented a report (copy attached) to City Council outlining
parking complaints at the 200 block of West Sixth Street and the 500 block
South "C" Street and some.suggested actions to help resolve some of the
complaints.
This report also suggested that a neighborhood meeting be held to discuss the
concerns and hopefully resolve some of the indifferences. A neighborhood meeting
was held Thursday evening, May 24th, with nine residents/businesspersons in
attendance and.a representative of the Tustin News.
DISCUSSION:
As a result of this neighborhood meeting, several concerns and/or ideas surfaced
with respect to the parking complaints as follows:
1. Restricted parking on "C" Street northerly
el seSixth
utilizing ethewould
streetpose
for
hardship both on the residents and anyone
parking.
The dwelling units along the 500 block sout�, of "C" Street have garages,
but these garages are either used for storage or the property owner
charges additional rent for the use of the Garage.
1UNE 13, 1984
.GE 2
2. Individuals delivering groceries, meals, etc. to the senior citizens
within the complex at the 500 block of south "C" Street can not find a
place to park within a reasonable distance of the point of delivery.
3. The Tustin garage utilizes the on -street parking for employee parking,
customer car parking, and parking of inoperable vehicles.
4. A concern of the residents was the industrial development on the
Southwesterly corner of Sixth Street and "B" Street was utilizing the
underground parking for storage in lieu.of vehicle parking.
In March, 1983, the Community Development Department reviewed a similar .
complaint and found no storage of materials. Additionally, on June 1,
1984, the underground parking area was investigated with the finding of
no material storage and the following vehicle/parking space information:
a. Total parking spaces available is 32.
b.. Eight vehicles parked in underground parking area.
A copy of the March, 1983 Community Development Department staff report
is attached -for information.
5. Mr. Chornomund suggested that the City might lease the vacant parcel at
450 El Camino Real to his business for use of parking on an interim
basis.
This suggestion has been reviewed and found not to be feasible. The
Redevelopment Agency purchased this parcel for future commercial
development and any use for parking would be very short term with respect
to the improvements that.would be required to have it function as a
parking lot.
6. It was also suggested that the top level of the parking structure on "C"
Street could be utilized for employee parking of the Tustin garage.
However, this parking structure should not be utilized for the long term
storage of inoperable vehicles.
7. The Chornomund's have requested the residents to notify then immediately
if any of their employees infringe upon the residents private properties,
disturbing the peace-, repairing vehicles in the street- right-of-way,
etc.., and they will attempt to reduce these occurences.
As a first phase reaction to these community complaints, staff suggests the
following actions:
1. Modify existing parking zones to read "Two Hour Parking Tow Away Zone,
6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Saturday" on Sixth Street both
easterly and westerly of El Camino Real.
JUNE 13, 1984
'AGE 3
2. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in+No.
1 above)
on
of
both sides of Sixth Street between Street and 15 _
E1 Camino Real in areas currently unmarked
arkin zones on Sixth Street and "C" Street as shown
3. Install handicapped p 9
in blue on the attached map.
4. Install additional red curb on all appon roaches of the "C"
Street/Sixth
tre t/Sixtached
It Street and "B" Street/Sixth Street intersections as
map.
In addition
to these measures, the Police Department is seeking to modify the .
Municipal Code to include a section of continuountinualtbasis�, i.These once
Tustin P
modifications would allow violators -to be cited on a co
every two, hours within a two hour parking limit zone.
Bob Ledendecker
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL:jr
Attachment
fril
/''� �►' = PASADENA AVE
%04 W V W 7 V u►
W i 7i70 Ln N-1
v
-71
i --�' �6,77v�.�FZv oo0000 7W .�
tMYRTLE AV
IGO G57��``5
t } , • �• G �?� I
AL
7col
G—
,�.ds _ ss
f 4
� - 600 - � .s � `:� �•. � • 1Gdi
o
PACI FIC - • - ST:
PST
ssts3PAC I F IC : ST 3d rn s3sL5 � C)1511F 0
CALI .. 4vs �iid 439
1416
=� x,04
4ZO 45
3fO U)
330 iso -4 35s
310 Zo
1 (ni —
6148
6 =_ = ST
4
PEPPERTREE
U) PARK _
_ZZs g - •
ti
Lo
kt
H --•4
4
171
4
PEPPERTREE
U) PARK _
_ZZs g - •
Ell" q
IgEffiris A
023
zo
ova
Lo
kt
H --•4
4
171
Ell" q
IgEffiris A
023
zo
ova
MINUTES OF A REGULAR 1£ETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 18, 1984
I, CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/ INVOCATION
The meeting was called to order by Mayo- Kennedy at 7:00 p.m. in the
City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial way. -The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman Edgar, and the Invo:ation was given by Councilman
Hoesterey.
I1. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present= UrsulFrank H. E. �
H. Greinke,MayorrrPro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoeste-ey
Donald J. Saltarelli
Councilpersons Absent: None
Others Present: James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledenaecker, Dir. of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Approximately 5O in the audience
III. PROCLAMATION - 1983 WOMAN OF THE YEAR
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a pro:lama-ion honoring and recog-
nizing Frances Wilcox Logan as the 1983 «oman of the Year, nominated by
the Tustin Historical Society. Mrs. Loan expressed her thanks to the
Council and the Historical Society, and Sine introduced family members.
Members of the Tustin Historical Society were invited to stand and
received recognition as well.
IV. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION; RECONVENED
to recess
At 7:09 p.m. it was moved by Greinke, z^3 ntl attersHoesa�r ed 5-0.
to a Closed Session or discus o -_
The City Council meeting was reconvenes at 7:32 p.m. with all members
present.
V. PUBLIC INPUT
1. DRAINAGE PROBLEM - 1422 LANCE DRIVE
Retired Major R. A. Campbell, 1422 lance Drive, complained that
stagnant water settles in front of nis home as a result of sewage
backed up on Andrews. He stated he nas complained to the Water and
Engineering Departments in the past =o no avail, and he will circu-
late a petition among area homeowne•-: and contact the County Health
Department if the problem is not olved. Mayor Kennedy assured
Mr. Campbell the Director of Publi: 40rks would be in contact With
91
him the next day.
2. PROPOSAL - BURGLARY PROTECTION SYSTEM
Philip Costanzo, 14422 Grassmere LE -e, proposed and demonstrated a
low-cost, high technology burglar�ote ostanzo ion sand requested tem which he has
developed. Mayor Kennedy thanke.
direct a letter to Council for ev-' iation, response and review 82
the Chief of Police.
CITY COUN-- i_ Mid
Pa4e 2,
VI. PUBLIC HEARING
1. APPEAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 84-8 - GEORGETOWN MANOR APARTMENT EXPAN-
SION AT 13181-13195 GWYNETH DRIVE
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as contained in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984,
prepared by the Community Development Department.
The Community Development Director summarized a letter dated
June 14, 1984, from Alice Anderson, 1362 Olwyn Drive, in opposition
to the project.
The Community Development Director narrated slides of the proposed
apartment expansion which were viewed by Council.
Mayor Kennedy opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m.
James Beauchamp, project applicant, spoke in favor of Use Permit
ho. 84-8 and responded to Council questions.
The following persons spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 84-8:
Howard Gorman, 1421 Mauna Loa
Edward Chang, 1271 Mauna Loa
Charles A. Tamulevich, 13191 Gwyneth Drive, kC, read a letter from
Michael/Diana Marchese, 1282 Olwyn Drive, in favor of U.P. #84-8.
Kent Sorey, 1321 Mauna Loa, spoke in opposition to Use Permit No.
8-111-8.
The following persons spoke in favor of Use Permit Nc. 84-8:
Tim Hawthorne, 13183 Gwyneth Drive, #A
hugh Daschbach, 13189 Gwyneth Drive, #C, read a letter dated
,lune 7, 1984, signed by three neighbors and himself.
Gilliam Jones, read a letter from Terry White dated A.oril 12, 1984.
5ernard Maye-O'Brien, 13181 Gwyneth Drive, ¢A
ne following spoke in opposition to Use Permit No. 8=-8:
Marsha Sorey, 1321 Mauna Loa
.:aures McKahan, 1392 Olwyn Drive
-ed Ondracek, 1342 Olwyn Drive, read letter dated %':ne 11, 1984,
`rom Mrs. Ondracek in opposition to Use Permit No.
.mon Kelly, 1312 Oiw_vn Drive
.-is Gorman, 1421 Mauna Loa
!'.3ureor, McKahan, 1392 Oiwvn Drive
..Ile public nearing was closed at 8:37 p.m.. b_,• Mayor t._nnec;.
:ouncil discussion followed, with consensus tna: tnE utter be con-
_inued to review project modifications, i.e., Bowe-ine structure
ne:ont to one-story, decreasing density throuen Lamination e`
grits, and providing fire access to the complex. _
was then moved by Greinke, seconded by cdga�. tc continue cer-
_'3eration of se Permit No. -6 to July 16, 1Q64. `lotion carries
8I
VII. CONSENT CALENDAR
It w -=s moved by Hoesterev, seconded by Edoar, to app-,ve the entire
Cons:_:-,`_, Calendar. Councilman Edgar made a correction _o the June 4,
1934, Minutes, page 4, item 4, to read as follows:
"4. =.JJOURNED REGULAR MEETING SCHEDULED - BUDGET DISCUSS:JNS
Council concurred to schedule an adjourned -eou':- meeting on
"iesday, June 5, 1984, at 4:00 p.m, in the City Conference
=Dour to discuss the 1984-85 budget."
CITY ,IL MINUTES
Page ,-18-84
The motion carried 5-0 to approve the Consent Calendar with the noted
correction to Lem o. 1.
1, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - J, 193-: (As corrected)
UNE 5
JUNE 6, 1934
2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE A`QUNT OF 5109,399.24 50
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 5878,090.18
3. RESOLUTION N0. 84-44 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 12018
Adopted Resolution No. 84-4= as recommended by the Community
Development Department.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 84-45 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,INFORMING
IhHE THEARTERIAL
EOFA THEGHWAY CITY OF FINANCING
TUSTIN
PROGRAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
Adopted Resolution No. 84-45 as recommended by the Director 54
Public Works/City Engineer.
5. REQUEST FOR RESTRICTED � PARKING DURING STREET SWEEPING OPERATIONS -
WALNUT PARK COMM
Authorized the installation of signing to restrict on -street
parking during street sweeping hours,
6:00 A.M. to Noon on
Monday, on all the streets within the Walnut Park Community
development and that warnings be issued in lieu of" citations
for the first 30 days after sign installation as recommended 75
the Director of Public Works./city Engineer.
6. LOAN TO TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELUNMM RUEM-1, .~W■•• -
PROJECT AREA
Authorized the Mayor to siqn the subject Agreement loaning the
South Central Redevelopmen: Project Area $125,000 at 145
interest as recommended by .ie Finance Director.
84-28
VIII. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION
None.
IX. ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
None.
X, OLD BUSINESS
1. PARKING COMPLAINTS - 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND 500 BLOCK
SOUTH "C" STREET
As recommended in the inter -co- report dated June 13,
1984, pre-
pared by the Director of Publ i -I WorKs , it was moved by Hoestere•. ,
seconded by Greinke, to authoriz= the following:
1) Two hour, parking tow awa zone, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Mone,%.
y
through Saturday on Sixth S_. between "B" Street and 150 + fee,
easterly of E1 Camino Real;
2) Install handicapped parkin_ zones on westerly side of
Street and the northerly s:c_ of "B" Street; and
3) Install red zones at the inverse; -ions of Sixth and C Stre��,
and Sixth and "B" Street.
In accordance with Councilman :=gar's suggestion, the Director of
Public Works was requested to :-ovide a status report six months
from implementation of the autr: izec action.
75
The motion carried 5-0.
,50
Leonard Chronomud, 14401 Clover-roo�, owner of Tustin Garage a.*
El Camino Real, voiced objections to the two-hour parking tow -away
zone on Sixth Street between Street and 150 + feet easterly of
E1 Camino Peal.
COUNCIL MIN;,
4, 6-18-84
Chris Chornomud, 14401 Cloverbrook, spoke in concurrence with
Leonard Chornomud's comments and requested that Tustin Garage be
provided sufficient timely notice of any changes to be implemented
in the parking conditions.
AGENDA ORDER
OTHER BUSINESS
Councilman Greinke extended congratulations to Joyce Bailey, Edison Company
representative, upon her election as President of the Tustin Chamber of Com-
merce.
Xi. NEW BUSINESS
1. PUBLIC HEARING - 1984-85 BUDGET
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to conduct a public
hearing on July 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m., regarding the preliminary
1984-85 budget as recommended by the City Manager in his inter-com
dated June 12, 1984. Carried 5-0. 29
2. ANNUAL TREE STUMP REMOVAL b GRINDING PROGRAM
Pursuant to the recommendation contained in the inter-com dated
June 13, 1984, prepared by the Engineering Division, it was moved
by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, to award the Annual Tree Stump
Removal and Grinding Program to Edney Tree Service for $7,175.00 as
recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 86.1
AGENDA ORDER - WALK-ON ITEM
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
COMMUNICOM/UNITED CABLE
Bob Guthrie, CommuniCom representative, made a chart presentation show-
ing that the system will be completely installed by June 30, 1984, with
the exception of three areas.
Councilman Greinke reiterated hi,. concerns regarding failure to obtain
corporate guarantees from Unmet Cable. He stated he would not support
anv extension until the City recovers 510,000 in legal fees from United
Cable, to which the City Attorney responded it could be a condition of
extension.
Bob Towe, Vice President of United Cable, explained the confusion sur-
rounding completion of system construction.
It was then moved by Saltarelli. seconoec t)Greinke, that subject to
payment of legal fees in the amount ,10,000, plus staff time spent
on the p^oject, CommuniCom wit be c:iven a 30-aay extension. for con-
struction without the 5500/day penalty and a 90-0a.v extension, for
acquisition, by Un'ted Cable.
Cour,_iiman Hoesterey was aoreeabie on the condition that ther- he
updates at 30 -cad intervals on how matter_ are proceedin_.
Mr. Towe stressed the quality of the system's operation, and requested
that acquisition of CommuniCom by United be kept a separate issue. He
aoreed the City should be reimbursed for additional legal expenses, but
noted that staff time is covered by the franchise fee and that, it
should not be included in ongoing expenses.
The City Manager recommended staff be directed to determine future
expenses as "reasonable compensation." There was general consensus and
furtner Council discussion.
The motion carried 5-0.
X1. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
3. BICYCLE 9 PEDESTRIAN FACILITY PROJECTS (FISCAL YEAR 1984-85)
53
The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and recom-
mendation as contained in his inter-com dated June 11, 1984.
CIT 'NCIL MINUTES
Pag 6-18-84
Following Council/staff discussion, it was moved by Edgar, seconded
Greinke, to autr,:)rize sidewalk construction on the northerly
side of McFadden Avenue and 200 + feet easterly of Tustin Village
Way and Pasadena Avenue at an estimated cost of $13,300.00, with
costs over and above Tustin`s allocation of $10,294.00 to be aug-
mented from the Gene -al Fund. Carried 5-0.
4. PROPOSAL TO REPLACE CITY WISHING WELL ENTRANCE SIGNS
The Community Development Director presented the staff report and
recommendation as cantained in his inter-com dated June 13, 1984,
on subject project.
Council discussion followed regarding installation of signs for
traffic entering Tustin from southerly points.
It was then moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to:
1) Authorize staff :o obtain competitive bids and expend a maximum
of $5,000 from the Beautification Fund to replace three City
entrance signs as recommended by the Director of Community
Development; anc
2) Direct staff to review a City-wide entryway sign plan, includ-
ing relocation'of existing signs, not necessarily tied to the
wishing well design.
The motion carried 5-0. 93
XII. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - JUNE 11, 1984
It was moved av Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar., to ratify the entire
Planning Commission Nction Agenda of June 11, 1984. After a brief
question -and -answer period, the motion carried 5-0. 80
2. COLUMBUS-TUSTIN WELL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Following a question -and -answer period, it was moved by Edgar, sec-
onded by Saltarelli, to receive and file the inter -corn report dated
June ; 1964 prepared by the Director of Public Works on subject
107
item. Carried 5-0.
3. STATUS REPORT CONCERNING ZONING CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
As recommended in :he inter-com dated ,June 13, 1984, prepared by
the Community Deveopment Department, it was moved by Fioesterey,
seconded b Edgar, :e receive and file subject report. Motion car
ried!)-U.
4. REVIEW OF CITY'S ZOKING b BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
It was moved Dv I+o_sterey, seconded by Edoar, to direct City staff
and the City Atto-ney to prepare the necessary documents for a
citation program tc enforce Zoning and Building Code violations as
recommended by the Community Development Department in the inter-
com dated June 13, :984.
Following Council/s::aff discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 81
5. PARK b CIVIC CENTER BOND REDEMPTION OPTIONS
The City Manaaer :resented the staff report as contained in the
inter-com report sated June 13, 1984, prepared by the Finance
Director, and responded to Council questions.
It was then movec 5v Edoar, seconded bly Saltarelli, to authorize
the Finance �rec:or to exp ore pure asing t e bonds (with no
increment limitati-.-is) and actively pursue same with available fund
balances. Motion carried 5-0. 50
CITY COUNCIL MIN,.
Nage 6, 6-18-84
XIII. OTHER BUSINESS
1. REQUEST FOR CONTINUED CLOSED SESSION
The City Manager requested a continuance of the Closed Session for
discussion of legal matters.
2. NATIONAL AWARDS FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING
The City Manager noted with pride that the City has been awarded a
Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting, and the Finance
Director has been presented an Award of Financial Reporting
Achievement, by the Government finance Officers Association of the
United States and Canada (GFOA). The City Council requested a
press release to that effect be prepared, accompanied by a Council
congratulatory letter to approp-fate staff members. 50
3. SAN DIEGO CREEK SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN
The City Manager responded to Councilman Edgar's inquiry on the
San Diego Creek Sedimentation Control Program, stating that the
City was not advised of same until most details had been worked
out, and the City's position is contrary to that stated in County
Supervisor Riley's letter. Staff has no intention of bringing the
matter to Council until a response to concerns on the program is
received.
4. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION GUIDELINES
There was discussion regarding expiration of Planning Commission
terms, establishing guidelines for interested applicants, and
establishing a logical appoint -rent procedure.
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the
Planning Commission to continue in its present form until such time
as appointments/reappointments are made. The motion carried 5-0.
80
5. TUSTIN LEGISLATORS
Councilman Greinke reported he was in Washington, D.C., a few weeks
ago and met with, and was able to express thanks personally to,
Congressman Dannemeyer on supporting Tustin on the Bullet Train
issue, and to Congressman Bad -a -n or, assisting in the realignment
issue through the USMCAS(H), lus_in.
6. REVIEW OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SIGN REGULATIONS
Councilman Greinke inquired or, :ne status of Council's direction at
its April 16, 1984, meeting to -irect staff to review existing sign
controls for possible revision _e place political signs under same
guidelines as those for realto etc. The Community Development.
Director responded that staff ho-3es to have a report at the Jule
1984, meeting. 93
7. CONGRATULATIONS TO COUNCILMAN EDGAR
Councilman Greinke congratulate= Councilman Richard B. cduar or� hi:.
joint char Tianship of the :ounty Sanitation District.
8. TUSTIN WATER UTILITY ANNEXATION NO. 131
Councilman Saltarelli ex;resse_ thanks to staff and City Council
for the excellent follow-up j7_ done in the LAFCO matter regarding
Tustin Water Utility Annexatior 'io. 131. 24
9. TUSTIN MEADOWS DRAINAGE PROBLEM
Councilman Saltarelli reported a problem in Tustin Meadows with the
Bridgeport/Greenmeadow drain ca::sing water backup, and it needs to
be flushed out. 91
Pac i -18-H4
10. CLEANUP OF NORTHBOUND 55 FREEWAY
Mayor Kennedy thanked the Director of Public WO -KS for effecting
the cleanup of the northbound Costa Mesa 55 freeNz:4 by C�alTrans.
XIV. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION; ADJOURNMENT
At 10:22 p.m., it was moved by Noesterey, seconded by Edqar, to recess
to the Redevelopment Agency, thence to a Closed Session for discussion
of legal matters; and thence adjourn to the next regular meeting on
July 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0.
MAY R
CITY CL RK
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY ff TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 18, 1984
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Kennedy at 10:22 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present: Ursula E. Kennedy, Chairperson
Frank H. Greinke, Chairperson Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
Agency Members Absent: None City Attorney
Others Present: James G. Rourke, er Mana
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City 9
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Approximately 10 in the audience
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved bY Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of
the June 4, 1994, meeting. 79e -Motion came 5-0.
4. LOAN TO TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - SOUTH CENTRAL PROJECT AREA
As recommended in the inter-com dated June 13, 1984, prepared by then
Finance Director, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterey,
authorise the Chairperson to sign subject
agreement accepting the loan of
$125,000.00 at 12% interest from the City's General Fund.
After a brief question -and -answer period, the motion carried 5-0• 84-881
5. MISCELLANEOUS
Mr. Greinke reported there are some major cracks in the parking structure
ramps which need to be sealed. He requested the Director o` Public Works
look into the matter.
6. ADJOURNMENT
At 10:24 p.m., it was moved b Edgar, seconaed by Kennedy, to adjourn to
the next regular meeting on m y 1, 9
_. .,arried-�-
i
M1! LR��- !
i
0.TE_
TO:
FROM:
susJ ECT:
MAY 2, 1984
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
IaL'..
No.
5-7-84
Inter -Com
.: D STAFF I-) L_
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
PARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLOCK WEST SIXTH STREET AND
500 BLOCK SOUTH "C" STREET
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Tustin City Council consider holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss
any proposed changes with respect to parking modifications that they desire to
implement along Sixth Street, C Street, or E1 Camino Real.
BACKGROUND:
A letter has been received from Mr. and Mrs. Charles Anderson- regarding vehicle
parking problems in the 200 block of West Sixth St. and 500 block of South 'C"
p list of ten signatures of Accompanying this letter was a
Street (copy attached).
individuals requesting additions to the existing parking limitations. The parcels
There these individuals reside are shown in yellow on the attached map.
DISCUSSION:
The Police Department traffic section has reviewed the concerns outlined in the
Anderson letter and have recommended, with concurrence of the Engineering
Division, implementation of the following measures:
Parking Zones
1. Modify existing parking zones to read " Two, Hour on „P'arki ng Tow Awath Zone, 6:0nd
A.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through
RealbetweenMain St. and
westerly of El Camino Real and along El
Newport Avenue/I-5 Freeway.
2. Add additional two hour parking zones � a -s described in No. 1 above) on both
sides of Sixth Street between "B" Street and Newport Avenue in areas currently
unmarked.
3. Add additional two hour parking zones (as described in No. 1 above) on both
sides of "C" Street between Sixth Stree.- and the northerly cul-de-sac
terminus in areas not covered by other recommended restrictions.
4. Add additional two hour parking zones las described in No. 1 above) on both
sides of "B" Street between Sixth Street and the southerly cul-de-sac
terminus.
PARKING COMPLAINTS AT 200 BLCOK WEST SIXTH STREI h.�0
500 BLOCK SOUTH C,�STREET
MAY 2, 1984
PAGE 2
Install h
andi caPP ed parking zones along Sixth Street adjacentto
the
esteri n
5.
portion of 570 "C" Street and adjacent to 540, 550-560 C St
blue on the attached map.
Red Zones th
1.
Install additional red curb on all approaches of the "C" Street/Sixmapstoeet
and "B" Street/Sixth Street intersections as shown on the a
tachedimprove intersection vi Sabi 1 i ty. . .
In addition ion to these measures, the Police. Department is seeking to modify the
Tustin n Municipal Code to include - a section on continuous i nual violations.
i ons . These . once
modifications would allow violators to be cited on a cont
every two hours within a. two hour parking 1 imi t zone.
None of these additional measures have been discussed with hat
he reriornto/anyiness
persons within the affected neighborhood.ltbesschesugdested uled to notify the
approval by the City Council, that a meeting
neighborhood of said changes.
Bob Ledendecker _
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
BL:jr
cc: Sgt. Smith, T.P.D.
A%ori l 24, 1984
T0: THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Mr. and Mrs. Charles W. Anderson
We want to call your attention on to the vehicle parki ng problem which exists in
k of West Sixth Street and the 500 block of South
f the garage
the 200 bloc in to the employees P
the parking of automobiles belong 9
located on the corner of E1 Camino Real and West Sixth Street.
he City Council and Tustin Police many t m al l n havetypes of
We have contacted t ndiscrparking of
asked for some kind of control over this eceived1fullt cooperation within the
vehicles, mostly in disrepair, and have r
limits of City control. -
1 broken-down, junky automobiles, all sizes of trucks
We contend with unsight yft from the
r streets for days at a time; abusive language from the
and motor homes lining ou men sleeping in these vehicles; litter parkway.
employees of the garage; from our avocado tree by
the vehicles in the street or eating them lunches in
the
men works ng on a very large limb was broke
This past Saturday morning attempting to park a 2 to 2 1/2 ton encla�keded bacrosse
one of the employees who was P
This same truck had been P
truck directly in front of our residence. _
the street for 10 days and had been ticketed by the police.
w have conducted a survey of the residential o and business
Due to the above, a to do
perso
nne1 in the 200 block of West Sixth Street and and advantageous thing
Street and the consensus is that the most prat is osted for limited
ask that the above stated area (diagram attached) b2 P Monday
is to 6 a.m. and six (6) P•m-
2 hour parking between six ( ) appearance of these
parking - i.e. two ( ) the
Saturday. This would greatly enhance better over
11 he limited on -street
streets, through
g
streets, and thus the community, as well as
and residences. We al so request one handl cline dopfathen
parking for both business the boundary
on the north side of West Sixth Street ri vewaveo` serve the needs of the
slot -
Anderson property eastward to the exp sti ng d I ' c _.•eet .
totci' hanoicarped Person residinc at the addressc'
y
of signatures and addresses of thosz requesting
Attached you wi i i find a list -
limited parkins posting.
NAM:
ADDRESS
NAME
AMRF
J l/�
Y 1� -
NAME: J
NAME:
ADDRESS
C
NAas: `
ADDRESS :
HAME s
ADDRESS:
NAME:-'-•�/�
ADDRESS:
NAME:
DRESS
� /
NAME: — ,-- � ,.`. • ADDRESS,
�.
ADDRESS
:
AMRESS
NAME:
ADDRESS :
NAMES
CL ADDRESS
NAMES e
ADDRESS:
1
-
v f 0 � O�a
PASADENA AvE
V1
r 674 t- 7 ...�
1%41
"
4,71 "41 Ilk
v 677 v: "7
- o
--{ MYRTLE AV
b� low
X ! %,':% .
FGi
Z
Epp J� �.
- - PAC FIC'- - ST: t
S, 7 S3 30 rn 535 ,
9 '.630 • . PLI C I F I C _ ST _
. - X
43
4-36
420
r' .-c t % •`
� . egg � � �•� .
VT
Lo ND -
f,Ass
5.=
_i Ni
• �� . �� WON �� •
- PEPPERTREE
• 2
PARK
P'• T
J �
Ln wo
m - _ •
m
O � Q
EL CAMING REAL
s (T1
171
PROSPECT AVE .
s O �, o o -•�
.,1 l
0 tr o
•
- PEPPERTREE
• 2
PARK
P'• T
J �
Ln wo
m - _ •
m
O � Q
EL CAMING REAL
s (T1
171
PROSPECT AVE .
s O �, o o -•�
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNC I L OF THE
CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
MAY 7, 1984
I,. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF
ALLEGIANCE/INVOCATION
The meeting was called
to order by Mayor Kennedy at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers,
300 Centennial Way. The Pledge of Allegiance
was led by Councilman
Hoesterey, and the Invocation was given by
Councilman Edgar.
II. ROLL CALL
Councilpersons Present:
Ursula E. Kennedy, Mayor `
Frank H. Greinke, Mayor Pro Tem
Richard B. Edgar
Ronald B. Hoesterey
Donald J. Saltarelli
Councilpersons Absent:
None
Others Present:
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Donald D. Lamm, Com. Development Director
Robert S. Ledendecker, Dir. of Public Works
Ronald A. Nault, Finance Director
Charles R. Thayer, Chief of Police
Royleen A. White, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Srvcs.
Isabelle McClements, Sr. Citizens Leader
Approximately 125 in the audience
III. PUBLIC INPUT
1. REGULATIONS FOR OFF
-SALE LIQUOR OUTLETS
Jack Miller, 17352 Parker Drive, representine the "Parents Who
Care" organization, read a letter dated May 4, 1984, addressed to
the Council which recommended: 1) A moratorium on issuance of per-
mits to alcoholic beverage outlets, except restaurant -type loca-
tions, to allow the Planning Commission and City Council time to
study the negative impact of such outlets: 2) That the criterion
for distance between schools and off -sale outlets be at 1,000
feet minimum, anr' 600 feet minimum for on -sale outlets; 3) That the
sale of alcoholic beverages and motor ver.icle fuel at the same
business location be prohibiter; and 4) That all off -sale outlets
be subject to the CUP process. as required by most other Orange
County cities.
It was then moved by Hoesterev, seconded by Edoar, to direct the
Planning Commission to review how other Orange Lounty cities are
dealine with this matter, and report back with recommendations
based on that review.
Mr. Miller requested that Co. nci1 also declare a morator`.um o�,
itsuance of permits durina the revier. period. In response to
Councilman Hoesterey, the City Attorney stated that the Council
could adopt a 90-d:.; moratorium, on issuance of any permits; staff
could come back to Council with an emergency ordinance of that
tvpe, ti-,ith a condition that a study is to be placed into process
witn a report Tor a permanent solution to come back to Council: and
the 90 -day moratorium could be extended at a later point.
Following Council/staff discussion, the motion was amended by
Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to direct staff to prepare an urgency
ordinance declaring a 90 -day moratorium on issuance of permits for
retail "off -sale" liquor outlets to alloy the Planning Commission
time to review other Orange County cities' regulations for same,
and report back with recommendations based on that review.
The amended motion carried 5-0. 81
CITE COuhCIi. NIr,
Page 2, �-7-81A
2. IRVINE COMPANY'S PROPOSED AUTO CENTER AT BRYAN A BROWNING AVENUES
The following persons spoke in opposition to subject project:
Bob Clevenger, 1761 Andrews, voiced concerns about the proposed
location of the project to schools, a church, and residential
areas.
Bruce Carter, no address given, felt the project should be termi-
nated without going into public hearings or plan review.
Councilman Edgar explained the Environmental Impact Report process
and noted that Council is legally required to conduct public hear-
ings to receive all evidence and public input.
Hubert Clark, 1942 San Juan, stated that the purpose of area resi-
dents attending this evening is to make Council aware of their
Opposition to the present location of the proposed project.
Councilman Saltarelli provided additional information pertaining to
development of the- East Tustin area; he assured the audience that
Council will not allow a commercial development 60 feet from exist-
ing residential areas; and that whatever is done, there must be
residential -type buffers to protect the existing residential
areas. Councilman Saltarelli stated he felt the project should be
located at the I-5 Freeway and Myford Road.
Oscar Barnhardt, 13872 Karen Way, shared photos of Browning Avenue
which was flooded during last year's rainstorms.
Mayor Kennedy thanked residents in attendance and encouraged all to
leave their name, address, and phone number with the City Clerk for
mailing of information and public hearing notices.
An informal question-and-answer/discussion period followed, and the
City Manager once again explained the EIR process.
81
IV. PROCLAMATIONS
1. "FIRE SERVICE RECOGNITION DAY" - MAY 12, 1984
Mayor Kennedy read and presented a proclamation to Battalion Chief
Greg Peterson, Orange County Fire Department, designating Saturday,
May 12, 1984, as "Fire Service Recognition Day." Chef Peterson
thanked the Council on behalf of Fire Chief Holms and the Orange
County Fire Department.
84
"OLDER AMERICANS MONTH" - MAY, 1984
A proclamation designating the month of May, 1984, as "Older, ir.,eri-
cans Month" was read and presented by Mayor Kennedy to Isa%bell
MicCl ements . Senior Citizens -eaoe- e
r�r
Council an *^ rs. MCClements thankee the
oduced ofr_ kers or various senior citizens ` clubs.
84
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
I. AMENDMENTS TO 1979 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE - ORDINANCE NO. 909
T7' staff r eaort and recommendation. was presented by the Community
11evelopmen,. Director as contained in the in;er-com dated May 7,
1984, prepared by the Community Development Department. A brief
question -and -answer period followed.
The public hearing was opened at 8:05 r.r:.. There being no speakers
on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
It was then moved by Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordi-
nance No. 909 have T first rea ing by tit e on
Following first reading by title only of Ordinance NoCa9rie�y5L0e
City Clerk, it was moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edqar, that
Ordinance No. 909 be introduced as follows:
CITY 'CIL MINUTES
Page 7-84
ORDINANCE NO. 909 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PART 8, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 8103 OF THE
TUSTIN MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING AMENDMENTS OF THE 1979 UNIFORM
BUILDING CODE (Re: Elevators, Escalators, Etc.)
30
Motion carried 5-0.
2. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT N0. 84-1 - ORDINANCE NO. 911
` The Community Development irent tpresented hfaor tl
recommendation contained heinterom dated May /1984
prepared by the Community Development Department.
{ Council discussion followed on restricting day care homes with
swimming pools.
The public hearing was opened at 8:10 p.m. There being no speakers
on the matter, the public hearing was closed.
Ordinance No.
It was moved b Edgar. seconded b HoeaC�1e ,St0hat The City Clerk
911 have irs reading y title on y.
provided first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 911.
It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Saltarelli, that Ordinance
No. 911 be introduced and amended to exclude day care homes with
swimming pools as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 911 - AN ORDINANCE pUSHESECT O COUNCIL
OF TTHE
CITY
OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING VAR
TY
CODE ALLOWING LARGE FAMILY ORDINARNCEHOMES IN AMENDMENTTHE NO. 84�1)E-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS ZO 1NG
Following Council/staff discussion, the motion carried 5-0. 109
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Item No. 7 was removed from the Consent Calendar bytheEdgar.
remain t wof
moved by Saltarelli, seconded b Greinke, to approve
the Lotisent C a en a ar. arrie
ETING
1, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 17, 1984, ADJOURNEDRIL 16, 1984, REGULAR REGULARMEETING
2. RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $107,040.90 50
APPROVAL OF DEMANDS IN THE AMOUNT OF 51,304,863.24
3. RESOLUTION NO. 84-34 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING H.R. 4103. (Cable Television)
Adopted Resolution No. 84-3: as requsted by the City Council 53
4. REJECTION OF CLAIM OF WILLIAM ALLEN REID; DATE OF LOSS: 3-8-84;
DATE FILED WITH CITY: 3-29-84; CLAIM N0. 84-7
Rejected subject claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 40
5. POLICE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
Authorized exception to Tustin bid procedures and authorized
purchase oltSwonCohuefrpatrolImpalas
fleet, tat rapcost ohe522,484older,
•721oh
as
mileage u 87
recommended by the Chief of Police.
6. RESOLUTION N0. 84-36 ORN]A AAPPROVINGRESOLUTION
FINALTHE
TRACT MAP COUNCIL
THE
138(26o1Y
OF TUSTIN, CALL
2685, 2691 Dow Avenue)
Adopted Resolution No. 84-36 as recommended by the Community
Development Department.
8. HOMEOWNER REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 13572 UTT DRIVE
Authorized removal of subject trees under the provision of the
current City Tree Removal Policy, Section II, as recommendedby
the Maintenance Superintendent.
CO LlNZILMI(�'.
, 5-/-84
9. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR TRACTS NO. 8590 AND NO. 8763
Aitnorized the following: 1) Execute the amended and restated
Jamboree Road Improvement Agreement between the Irvine Company
arc the City of Tustin; and 2) Release of the following Sub-
division Improvement Bonds: Tract No. 8590, #244109 - Faithful
Performance in the amount of 5318,750.00 and #244109 - Labor
and'Materials in the amount of $159,375.00 and Tract No. 8763,
X2584139 - Faithful Performance in the amount of 5498,700.00,
and 12584139 - Labor and Materials in the amount of $249,350.00
as recommended by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
45; 84-26
10. CITIZEN REQUEST FOR TREE REMOVAL - 14831 BRANBURY CIRCLE 99
Authorized removal of subject tree under provisions of Section
I: of the current City Tree Removal Policy as recommended by
the Maintenance Superintendent. 86.1
11. DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS ITEMS
Declared the 45 items listed in subject report as surplus items
to the needs of the City as recommended by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer. 85
12. RESOLUTION NO. 84-37 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 84-2
(Walnut Street)
Adopted Resolution No. 84-37 as recommended by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer. 81
Consent Calendar Item No. 7 - Senior Center Consultant Contract -
Councilman Edgar expressed concern that a tentative date be fixed for
commencement of project. If that date is not feasible, then a report
should be made to Council fixing a future date, etc. Council discus-
sion followed. It was then moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoestere , to
approve the following with the condition that Council have a status
report at :he September 4, 1984, Council meeting:
7. SENIOR CENTER CONSULTANT CONTRACT
Ap:ove�; the Senior Center Consultant Contract with Recreation
Sys -:ems, Inc., in the amount of 55,000 and authorize the Mayor
anc %"'i -:y Clerk to sign the agreement as recommended by the
Re:reation Superintendent.
Motion car-ied. 45
84-27
VI:. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION
1, KJISAN-_E ABATEMENT PROCEDURE - ORDINANCE NO. 908
The Con—in'.ty Development Director presented the staff repo r; and
recommeraat;on as contained in the inter-com dated Nav 0,RL
c retia --e-- ')v the Community Deve i opment Depa r:ment .
Counc;.'stE=f discussion followed regarding Councilman Greinke's
concer- ov_- prohi'itine parking of vehicles on residential lawns.
Counci- to direct staff to present a play, at the r;av 2'
for abatement /removal of inoperative vehi;ies anr'
prop ^'— c-. of parking vehicles on lawns.
It was :her moved by Saltarelli, seconded by Edgar, that Ordinance
hav_ firs', rea ing y title only. Carried5-0. Followinq
first •=ad rc of Ordinance No. 908 by title only by the City Clerk,
it was ny Edgar, seconded by Greinke, that Ordinance No. 908
be int-ocuc;_'-c as follows:-
ORDINANCE
o ows:
ORDINANCE NCI. 908 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 5, SECTIONS 5500 THROUGH 5510,
TO ART:CLE 5 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE, ESTABLISHING NUISANCE ABATE-
MENT R=S_1L:7I0NS
Motion :ar.'':Ad 5-0. 81
CIT' 4'CIL MINUTES
Page �-7-94
VIII. ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
1. ZONE CHANGE 84-1 - ORDINANCE NO. 910
It was moved bX Hoes tere seconde_ by Edqar, that Ordinance No.
910 have second�
reading y title ry. arried 5-0. Following
second reading by title only of `-dinance No. 910 by the City
Clerk, it was moved by Edqar, seconc-�d by Hoesterey, that Ordinance
No. 910 be passed and adopted as to ,ows:
ORDINANCE N0. 910 - AN ORDINANCE OF -HE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING THE RE -ZONING OF THE PRO:_RTY LOCATED AT 17361 MCFADDEN
AVENUE FR,"M MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDE`. -IAL (R-3) DISTRICT TO RETAIL
COMMERCIA'' (C-1) DISTRICT
Roll call vote:
AYES: Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, ,ennedy, Saltarelli
NOES: gone 110
ABSENT: hone
IX. OLD BUSINESS
None.
X. NEW BUSINESS
1. PARKING COMPLAINTS - 200 BLOCK W. SIXTH STREET b 500 BLOCK S. 'C'
STREET
The Director of Public Works prese-:ed the staff report and recom-
mendation as contained in his report dated May 2, 1984.
Charles A.hderson, 255 West Sixth ::reet, relayed vehicle parking
problems and incidents related to sane.
Council/s:aff discussion followed, a -t the Chief of Police reported
methods tney are legally empowerec to use to resolve some of the
parking problems.
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by=reinke, to conduct a neighbor-
hood meeting to discuss any propos__ changes with respect to park-
ing modifications that residents c= -Pre to implement along Sixth
75
Street, "C" Street, or El Camino Rea-. Carried 5-0.
2. REPORT OK 40 PLUS ADULT SOFTBALL LE&GGUE FEES
The stair report and recommendatic- was presented by the Director
of Commjrity and Administrative Se -•'_es as contained in the inter-
com date: Mai• 2, 1984, prepared by :ie Recreation Superintendent.
Foliowinz a brief question -and -a'_., -2r period, it was moved by
Greinke, seconded by Saltarelli, :: maintain a fee of 5225, and
41
eep the same number of games and :-=�ds. Carried 5-0.
3. LOCAL REGULATION OF FIREWORKS - RESOLUTION NO. 84-38
As reconT--ended in the i nter-com d:-: _ Ma v 3, 1984, prepared by the
City At,c-ney, it was moved by Edc_-. seconded by Kennedy, to adopt
the fol':,»ing:
RESOLUTION NO. 84-38 - A RESOLUTI0% DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING -'-E CO141C.EPT OF LOCAL REGULATION
OF FIREW._RKS
Motion carried 5-0. 52
CITY COUNCIL N.INL
�'aqe 6, 5-7-84
XI. REPORTS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - APRIL 23, 1984
Mayor Kennedy expressed appreciation to the Planning Commission and
staff for their work on Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 84-1 (Large
Family Day Care homes).
Councilman Saltarelli reported that Planning Commissioner Kathy
Weil has suggested that 1) the Council Chambers have an identifica-
tion sign; and 2) an interior board be installed in the Chambers
for noting agenda changes, etc. The City Manager indicated staff
would investigate same.
The Planning Commission Action Agenda of April 23, 1983, was rati-
fied by unanimous informal consent. 80
2. TILLER DAYS PROGRESS REPORT
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Kennedy, that the inter -corn
on subject item dated April 1/, 1964, prepared by the Community
Services Department be received and filed. Carried 5-0. 34
3. REQUEST FROM PLANNING COMMISSION TO AFFIRM NEED TO INITIATE ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT LIMITING SPECIFIC USES IN THE IMMEDIATE VICIN-
ITY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Following consideration of the inter-com report dated May 7, 1984,
prepared by the Community Development Department, it was moved by
Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to receive and file same. Carried
-0. 81
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
1. THIRD QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT OF OPERATIONS
The City Manager reported that the Third Quarter Financial Report
of Operations has been provided to Council and suggested that it be
reviewed in conjun:tion with a Budget workshop or as an agenda
item, whichever Coinci1 desires. The budget will be delivered to
Council the latter part of the week. 29
2. AUTHORIZED DELEGATE - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, ORANGE COUNTY
DIVISION
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Hoesterev, to appoint Council-
man P.icharc B. Edoar as Justin's authorized votinc delegate at the
�eaeue of California Cities, Drange Cour,--% DivisiOn, meetinc to oe
riel d on May 1C, 198-1. Ca rri ec 5-0. 73
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION
The Citv Manaaer requestec E Closed Session for discussion of leoal
Matters.
4. OIL LEAKS ON CITY STREETS
In response to Councilman Saltarel 1 i 's complaint of an ole vehicle
aari:ed in Tustin Meadow_ which leaks. a oreat am')un: or of t.ne
Crie` of Police requested that he be provided with the address of
same.
5. KUDOS TO MAYOR KENNEDY
Councilman Saltarelli was joined by Councilman Greinke in coaniend-
inG Mayor Kennedy on conducting her first meeting as Mayor.
6. ABATEMENT OF OVERCROWDED HOUSING
Councilman Greinke reported the City of Santa Ana has imposed jail
terms on landlords for illegally overcrowded housing and requested
that staff work with Santa Ana to see if Tustin can take the same
type of action.
CIT' 1CIL MINUTES
Page 5-7-84
7. BULLET TRAIN
Councilman Hoesterey reported that American High Speed Rail's
costly trip to Japan has proven unsuccessful in view of reactions
expressed by several legislators who attended, rode the bullet
let
train, and reviewed economics of the project.
8. JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
Councilman Edgar requested that the Council strongly oppose con-
tinued increase in air flights out of John Wayne Airport.
9. BID AWARD, COLUMBUS-TUSTIN WELL PROJECT
In accordance with Councilman Edgar's concern and following
Council/staff discussion, Council concurred to schedule a Redevel-
opment Agency meeting on May at :00 p.m. for bid award
of the Columbus Tustin Well project, to be followed by a City Coun-
107
cit workshop regarding water deficiencies.
10. CONGRATULATIONS TO ENTIRE CITY STAFF
Councilman Saltarelli congratulated all City departments and staff
for the fine job they have done in the last 90 days which has had
the greatest activity in Tustin's history, i.e., elections, bullet
train, auto center, etc.
11. ACQUISITION OF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
Councilman Hoesterey reported that homeowners have expressed inter -
est in acquiring abandoned railroad land between the Peppertree and
Tustin Meadows subdivisions. He requested that staff work with the
homeowners from the standpoint of avoiding potential problems. The
Director of Public Works stated he is presently working with the
residents.
12. CONFIRMATION OF QUORUM FOR MAY 21, 1984, COUNCIL MEETING
mayor Kennedy reported that two Council members will be out of town
or: May 21, 1984, and was able to confirm a quorum will be present
a:. subject Council meeting.
XIII. RECESS - REDEVELOPMENT - CLOSED SESSION; ADJOURNMENT
-,t 9:19 p.m. it was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Saltarelli, to recess
�o the Redevelopment gency, thence to z dosed ession for discussion
leoal matters; and thence ac;journ to a workshop regarding water
ceficiencies immediately followinc the Redevelopment Agency adjourned
^egular meeting on May 15, 1984, at 5:0C! P•'�-> and thence to the next
--ocular srp-e`inc on May 211, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. Carried 5-0.
— AC T I NC hsr'.YOT.` %—
MINUTES OF A REGUILAR MEETING
OF THE REDEV'ELOPKENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTIh, CALIFORNIA
MA - 7, 1 ?84
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order �v C-=irperson Kennedy at 9:19 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, 300 Centennia' may, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
Agency Members Present: Ursule " =. Kennedy, Chairperson
Frank i-. Grz--nke, Chairperson Pro Tem
Richarc B. :-_gar
Ronald S,. h:=sterey
Donald S!'tarelli
Agency Members Absent: None
Others Present: James G. Ro,:-ke, City Attorney
William. A. h:ston, Exec. Director/City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Donald D. Lawn, Com. Development Director
Ronald A. Aa -.alt, Finance Director
Robert S. Leiendecker, Director of Public Works
Charles R. "payer, Chief of Police
R6yleen A. h`iite, Dir. of Admin. & Com. Services
Approximately 20 in the audience
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved !!X Hoestere , secondee oy Edgar, to approve the minutes of
the Apri_1_16, 1984, meeting. a:'rie_ 5-0. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
It was moved bx Hoestere , secondee ov Edgar, to approve demands in the
amount OT$197,273.53 Tor the wontn: of Ra -r -c -hand April, 1984, as recom-
mended by the Finance Director. Mot on carried 5-0. 81
5. IST ANNUAL EL CAMINO REAL CHAMPIONSHIP CHILI COOK -OFF
Mr. Hoesterey invited everyone =o a ---end the Chili Cookoff to be held on
E1 Camino Real between First and n Streets on Sunday, June 3, 1984,
from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
6. TUST I N LIONS GARAGE SALE
Mr. Greinke announced the Tus`�- Club is holdina the "World's Larg-
est Garage Sale" on Saturday. ',a\l 1984, a. Tustin Nioh School and
extended an invitation to every--ne attend,'participate.
7. ADJOURNMENT
At 9:21 p.m. it was moved by Gre,e, seconded .DY hoesterey, that the
Agency adjourn to an ac,lournec ec_ � meet,.nc o�a< it -
P.M., and thence to the nex, mee, nc or M -ay 21, '_984- Carried
-0.
ACTINn CHAIRPERSON
"—%, ,• / �--ccs—.
RECORDING SECN-TARY
Following the Closed Session, the Bo -_d of Directors authorized the City
Attorney and the City Manager tc nec_.iate the purchase of the Southern
Pacific Land Company parcel (approx;mat=-v 44,660 square feet) situated at the
northwest corner of Irvine Blvd. a-:. Avenue for a price not to exceed
510.30 per square foot.
f—�--- _
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MARCH 10, 1982
WILLIAM HUS MN, CITY MANAGER
lnter-Coin
BOB LEDENDECKER, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CAMINO REAL AND SIXTH STREET
REO>1MENDATI0N:
That the Tustin City Council,.at their meeting of March 15, 1982, authorize the
red zoning of curbs at the intersection of E1 Camino Real at Sixth St., resulting
in a loss of thirteen (13) on -street parking spaces, prior to the installation of
the forthcoming traffic signal.
BACKGROUND:
As a result of the closure of "C" Street, the City Council authorized the
installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of E1 Camino Real and Sixth
Street. The installation of this signal will require the red zoning of curbs to
provide improved intersection visibility and adequate turning radii for vehicular
traffic. More recently, at their last meeting, the City Council expressed their
desire to proceed with the red zoning prior to the signal installation. It is
anticipated that the traffic signal plans and specifications will be presented to
the City Councii at their April 5, 1982 meeting for authorization to advertise for
bids.
DISa7SSION:
The attached drawing indicates the additional areas that will require parking
removal for the forthcoming traffic signal installation.
These areas are detailed below:
STRE-
South leg of E1 Camino Real
(westerly side)
North ►eg of E1 Camino Real
(westerly side)
(eas zerly side)
Weste-rly leg of 6th St.
(northerly side )
( southerly side)
ADDITIONAL PARKING
SPACES TO BE REMOVED
i
L
1
2
2
PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CANINO REAL AND SIXTH STREET
MARCH 10, 1982
PAIGE TWO
STREET
Easterly leg of 6th St.
( northerly side)
(southerly side)
BOBEiD.�1 DM '
DIRECIOR OF PUBLIC O
CITY ER
db
Attachment
ADDITIONAL PARKING
SPACES TO BE REMOVED
TOTAL
3
2
13
KINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF MiE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF TUSTI N , CALI FORN I A
March 15, 1982
1. CALL TO ORDER
71ie meeting was called to order by Chairman Sharp at 3:12 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California.
2. ROLL CALL
580,741.5E
Agency Members Present:
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp
Agency Members Absent:
None
Others Present:
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
Gillespie Construction, Buena Park
William A. Huston, Exec. Director/City Manager
California Western, Placentia
Mary E. Wynn, Recording Secretary/City Clerk
Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Par}:
Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director
A. M. Construction, Inc., Whittier
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
R. J. Noble Company, Orange
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
All American Asphalt, Orange
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Sully -Miller Constracting Compan_., Orange
Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Excel Pavinc Company, Lone beach
Royleen White, Community Services Director
Mever Constructors, Highland
Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department
The lo -7 bid __ 25k below the enG_neer's estimatE of $107,584.40, w:tt-.
Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk
for the projects. ns recom-
Approximately 30 in the audience
3. APPROVAL OF KMTES
Division, __ was moved by Edgar, seconded
It was moved by Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, to approve the minutes of the
March 1, 1982, regular meeting. Carried 5-0.
4. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS
It was moved by Hoesterey, seconded by Edgar, to approve General Demands
for the month of February, 1982, in the amount of $$38,186.07 as recom-
mended by the Director of Finance. Motion carried 5-0. 81
5. BID AWARD - ALLEY R1=NSTIMrTZON IP5PROVEMENTS, PROJE= 1, II & III
-ds for subject project were rece_.-ed as follows:
Porter Construction Company, Santa Ana
580,741.5E
Sun Paving Company, Santa Ana
$86,132.01
Five States Plumbing, Orange
$86,153.70
Hardy & Haroer, Inc., Tustin
$86,614.16
Gillespie Construction, Buena Park
$89,190.6C•
California Western, Placentia
$90,801.25
Fleming Engineering, Inc., Buena Par}:
;95,149.12
A. M. Construction, Inc., Whittier
;?5,266.2;
R. J. Noble Company, Orange
$97,927.7-.
All American Asphalt, Orange
�1UG,457.15
Sully -Miller Constracting Compan_., Orange
1OZ,222.0=
Excel Pavinc Company, Lone beach
107,685.0(
Mever Constructors, Highland
s108,071.3C
The lo -7 bid __ 25k below the enG_neer's estimatE of $107,584.40, w:tt-.
5102,000.00 ir. RDS funds t-)resentlx budgeted
for the projects. ns recom-
mended in the report dated March 9, 1962,
prepared by the Eng;:ieer.inc
Division, __ was moved by Edgar, seconded
by Kerne6v, to away tine con-
tract for subject project to the _ow bidder,
Porter Construction Company,
inc., Santa Ana, in the amount of 190,741.5E.
Carried 5-6. 95
6. AGENCY CONCERNS - None.
7. ADJOURN KEN T
It was moved by Eduar, seconded by Hoesterey, to adjourn at 3:15 p.m. to
the next regular meeting on April 5, 1982. Carried 5-0.
RECORDIt!C SECRET(l�y
li.INUTES OF A REGULAR METING
OF THE TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
300 Centennial Way
March 15, 1982
1. CALL
TO ORDER The meet:nc was called to order by Mayor Sharp at 3:15 p.m.
II. ROLL
CALL Councilpers3ris Present:
Counc:lpers.3ns Absent:
Others Present:
III. PRE-
SENTATION
Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarell-
Sharp
None
James G. Rourke, City Attorney
William A. Huston, City Manager
Mary E. Wynn, City Clerk
Mike Brotemarkle, Comm. Dev. Director
Ken Fleagle, Planning Consultant
Bob Ledendecker, Director of Public Works
Roy Gonzales, Personnel Director
Ronald Nault, Finance Director
Royleen White, Community Services Director
Fred Wakefield, Captain, Police Department
Eva Solis, Deputy City Clerk
Approximately 30 in the audience
1. PROCLAIQiTION - "RED CROSS MONTH"
-'tie Maur read and presented to Scott Tokarzewsk" Red Cross
Youth .=lunteer, a proclamation designating March, 1982, as "Red
Cross Yonth.w 84
IV. PUBLIC
CONCERNS
1. TBE CALT_FORNIAN TENANTS' ASSOCIATION - CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION
Pic.: 'r_.—o -?res--'dent of Cal :forn:an Tenants' Assoc _at_o:., pro-
videe un:.etP or the condom _'n:urr. conversion proposal n_•- Cal-
State=ssocrates for the Cal:forn:an Apartments and relave6
nroble -_= residents are facing_ as outl:ned :n h -'s letter dated
March 19==. Mr• Horton added that as:de from cosmet:c
repa:ri. no structural repairs are beinc maie. Also, construe -
tion c-. a temporary structure was commenced the week before,
with2= mar:Inc spaces removed for a storage area, without City
perryits _ stop work order was issued by t" -If C tv, but Mr.
hortor reported that wort: has been cont:nuInc on the project out
of the view.
Tne Co_,un_ty Development Director responded that no tentative
r:.ap or =Ina= map has been filed, therefore, the City :s pres-
ently�es'_Inc w:th a Use Permit onlv and utlli=_:ng tentative map
�.apro: as a mechanism by wh:ch to achieve compliance. He cor.-
a:nuec tnat :f a tenant has a spec:f:c problem, :t should be
reoorte_ to the Commun:tv Development Department, and an Inspec-
tor a:__ be ser.- out to that unit. That particular unit ma
thenrpie=emeal-Improved." Staff has been press -r= for su!_-
m:tta__f a comprehensive plan for the overall treatment. There
:s .�a__o-: Coordinator on-site now. Staff has :nformed Cavi
State=_ssoc_ates that any building perry_:t issued, on e:t`ier all
or a of the project, constitutes :mplementat-'on of the
conver__D n• -ve n though the 120 days on tthe ass:stance program
does :._ : co-.mence until Mav 16, whe.r. will be automat:c for
all te-._:ts, those tenants that would be- spec:fready affected
by any bu::c:ng permit would be automatically, :mmed:ately
eligib:_ for the relocation assistance program because the
buildin__ per -:t would supersede the 120 -day wafting notice. As
part of the Jse Permit approval, the relocation plan w:'_: auto-
mat_c_=_`: co :nto effect on Piav 18 for ell tenan-S.
P.1ki,• _ , -, - 1
.a. State Assoc-ates has been informed by stafl that encios_ng
_ne garages would be considered a bu:Id-no Ix-rm=t for those
_enants whose qaraqes or parking spaces were eliminated and the
-elocat-on assistance plan would be implemented for those units
:ryned;ately, and a stop work order was issued on those building
enclosures. A stop work order was not issued for remova: of
s.-)rne of the storage units within the parking garages, since it
-mould have been granted regardless of whether a conversion was
`re -ng cons-dered or not.
%ormally the map and use permit are coterminous. In th_s parti-
_;lar case, without a subdiv4sion map the requirement for 120-
-:vs' notice of intent to convert is not enforceable until
actual commencement of sales is within 120 days.
�tr. Horton requested that Council consider implementing a time-
table for completion of the conversion. Councilwoman Kennedy
suggested that anything that threatens health, safety, or life
be checked into and compliance encouraged.
^ne City Attorney stated that under the approval given, the
developer is required to file a proposed tenant relocation pur-
chase plan with the City. Even though a document entitles
'Highlights - Tenant Assistance Program" was filed last week,
tIke developer should file a document with details of the tenant
assistance and relocation for consideration by staff and
approval by the Council or Planning Agency. Secondly, any
waiver of conversion rights being signed by tenants does not
:ave any application. City approval and Ordinance 822 require
-nat anybody whc was a tenant at the time of Use Permit approval
January, 1982, is entitled to receive relocation benefits.
-=ter further discussion, the City Attorney indicated staff
could :cake available to all tenants copies of the document enter
_led "r.ic*-.'-ghts" whic-: has been filed with the City. If anv
_enant has input approv:ng!disanprorinc same, it should be filed
;ith the Community Development Department. Ultimately, the
_roject must have City approval. First, the 0ev•2loaer should
and identifv ' whatever file complete plan is, Dro-oe
c_oies to the tenants, and staff car: proceed frog tlerr tc mage
recommendation to the Agency. and wnen a final document -s
filed, the developer car. prow -de z�enantE: Math a copy of same.
93
V. CON SEA T
CALENDAR
_e- '' ..a, removed from, the :-nsent Calendar nv Sal tare Ili . :_ w;:.
--dca_, seconaed b•: =-erev, to approve the remainae,.- of
_n,L- _Dnsent Calendar. M,o- -o- carr -e6 5 -(,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Marci. i , 1962.
2 . hDPROVAi OF DEMANDS in the' amoun',_ of
RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL In the amount of 50
PESOLUTION NO. B2-19 - Resolut_or. of ,.nc _-t1' Counc__ the
' - c c Q Tat_ �,� ', !, !i;, 1.
Tust- , Ca_ -fornix, ORDERIN:'
:CiP%�: E:.EZ7^-'IOI: BE HEIa Ji: :J :�:,`', ,..';I 13, 19632, H::
PK
Adoption of Resolution No. asrecrrn ie. b_• thf - w
Clerk. 4B
4. FESOLUTION NO. 82-20 - Resolut-on -:•` the _-t\• Counc_' of t')-
of Tust_n, -.L' fornix, S7PPOR=L cG THE EFt'URTS OF ;.:AHE-'
:1, PARK, ORI%NGE, AND OTHER ORANGE COUNT -i CITIES eV, OP3At:IE�-
"�£ T) BRING 'NE SUPER B7>h:. XX ':O ANA111:1M STA DIU!j
I,doption of Resolution No. 62-20 a_ requested by the Ci y
36
Council.
`.'r� :I:, r:IN,;TES
Page -15-82
S. RESOLUTION NO. 82-21 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, SUPPORTING RATIFICATION OF THE PERI-
PHERAL CANAL REFERENDUM
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-21 as requested by the City
Council. 107
6. RESOLUTION NO. 82-22 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin ACCEPTING WORDS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING
RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (EI, CAMINO UTILITY UNDER-
GROUND DISTRICT NO. 5 CONVERSIONS)
Adoption of Resolution No. 82-22 as recommended by the Engi-
neering Department. 104
The Director of Public Works responded to Councilman Edgar that
ti: -:s contract provides the conduit for the telephone conversion,
and actually has noth►ng to do with the conductor cable for
telephone service; the telephone company will be converting that
on their own. Also, staff is waiting for the telephone company
to complete the conversion (approximately three weeks) until
final accounting notices are sent out.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 82-23 - A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Tustin, California, AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GEN-
ERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE CERTAIN
ITEMS (POLICE PATROL VEHICLES) (BUDGETED)
Approve purchase of six police patrol vehicles at a total
purchase price of $54,343.38 and adoption of Resolution No.
82-23 as recommended by the Chief of Police. 87
8. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF SCOTT MUMER - Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Filed
With City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 62-4
Deny claim of Scott Keeler as recommended by the City Attor-
ney. 40
9. DENIAL OF MAIM. Or PEARL MURRAY - Date of Loss: 12-6-81, Flied
4a=. City: 2-11-82, Claim No. 82-5
Deny claim of Pearl Mut-ay as recommended by the City Attor-
nev. 40
10. DENIAL OF C"&IM OF PETER OLIVARES - Date o: Loss: '-r-8
F=1ec Wlith City: 2-11-82, Cia_rr. No. 82-6
Dene claim of Peter Olivares as recom- mended b•_: the City
Attorney. 40
Consent, Calendar Item No. 11 - :'_nce the City is not a member o: tae
So%:them California itssociatior. of ,,overnments (SCAC) , Councilman
Saltareili questioned the necessity of the resolut_on, wh-'& would
comr;_t the City to a regional sedimentation program (establ_sned b
SCAG) and require a great deal of staff time.
^_ne City Manager and Director of Public Works proy_ded clar_`._ca-
t_or., stating that the Citi- is under a State/Federal mandate to
comply with the program; a need to increase staff Is not env_s:ones;
th-E program is for the betterment of the regional area;
be_na a=oposed in the form of a resolution in lieu of an ord:nanc•-,
w.__Cho SZAG has been promoting; and it is more of a voluntary compl_-
a-_e and coor�erat_on rather than a stiff, regulatory measure, wi1_&i
be tai• ultimate.
In response to the Mayor, -_ouncilman Saltarell_ stated ne would be-
favor
efavor of the resolution so long as the last paragraph in tht-
resolut_on is loose enough tiia= the C --t,,- cannot be forced to creat; -
a7. ordnance unless both the ;qty and the Santa F,na Regional tJate_
Control Board (Rt.,)CB) agree that the ve_untary program is
_nef`ect_ve. The City Manager stated that _s the intent. In an-,,
case, the item would come back to Council and allow the opportunity
to take whatever direction would be appropriate. The resolution
merely _ndicates a statement of Intent.
It was then rnnved 2)v Kennedy, seconded by Edaar, , to a(Aoi)t the'
followin7 resolution as recommended by tht• Enq_neering F)epart-
ment:
11. RESOLUTION NO. 82-24 - A Resolution of the Citi• Council of the
Citi• of Tun ---'n APPROVING J11E IMPLEMENTATION AI4D ENFORCEMENT OF
THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE SOUTH COAST AREAWIDE WASTE TREATMENT
MA14AGEME14T PLAT; APPLICABLE 7U THE CITY
Motion carried 5-0.
VI. ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION - Wone
107
VII. ORDI-
NANCES FOR
ADOPTION
1. ORDINANCE NO. 869 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City
of Tustin REZONING 13681 REDHILL AVENUE FROM R-3 (2700) TO R-3
(1960)
It was moved by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance
No. 869 have second reading by title only. Motion. carried 5-0.
Following reading of the title by the City Clerk, it was moved
by Edgar, seconded by Hoesterey, that Ordinance No. 869 be
passed and adopted. Roll call vote:
AYES: Edgar, Hoesterey, Kennedy, Saltarelli, Sharp
NOES: None
110
ABSENT: None
VIII. OTUER
BUSINESS
1. TILLER DAYS COMMITTEE REQUEST
Cy)�_ill Webb, Tiller Days Chairperson, reported that t'jt, co:n-
r.i--tee :las looked into a couple of sources for the third :>ower
ttie the nt-r- ;c vat"
One ir
source. !JO_l._nc '.laS moron'.
�=
ne-ther of tt?e twu source`6 comes througr., the i.Om)rt_ttee net -ds.
conn- from rom the Citi -Citi -because they feel tne, cannot cc the
Tiller Days without the third pole am electricity. In response
to Couixilmar. hoesterel•, Ms. Web'_- tha-_ last yc2;:_,
=ss>c were blown and circuit brewer- went o`_r wit.. the e>:ist=nc
r_:-L_nnent, and. mam boot. renters c_c not have the
they neeaea.
-._�•0r, t 11 CO^m:I n_: _ ,e rv; Ce£�
renerte. _aa So .then.. Ca'_.forr._a Ec_sn:-company does not get
_n, lvec t}le hardware enc. Gene Carter, Southern. Ca-iforr.,�
Lt.tna' "'-• T�O�', _. no: r!lF .SSllt': _- til COI!—
me C:ai iJ7ti, e.. tha- i_ eY.7enS�VE, wf.:C.', iG_SO�. �JTM
noes nn', nanc1c.
:lis. Webr, res_aonaec tc: Counci:mar. Hoesterey that 1, c_
boo"15 would havt to be __iminatFc, alonc with the panda :�
f f act_v_�_e< <_r- be accommodate- b.
Brea i.. as- , _ -
e^c_ gym• nt. F ,e is dec �.at generators• a- e>:'renely cost__ a-"-•
,a r. -s +rinse to Counciiwotnan -;ennedl the Cortmun.itY Se~v:Ce
�irer-t�r stated tilat C=tv use of the tn:rd pole cannot :x lus".'-
`_er, ^, for P:)urt!, of July act_._.._es, and __ile: il:_ � not
tny_.::cxl• a� b•�co�n:nc s;elf-sun: "rt_no _`or appro:.imat�ly _�.
vears
Followine further Counc_: discussion, Coun-_! concurred that
C,>u lcilmem'Ders Edgar and !,ennedy .., _ . _ with Webb to :ttemp�_
tc i�act, a solutio 34
VIZI. NEW
BUSINESS
:-_TY __ M:!4:;TES
F'ayc• . 15-8:'
1. BID AWARD - RED HILL AVENUE AHFP PROJECT NO. 1064
B_ds for subject project were received as follows:
R. J. Noble Co., Orange
$130,964.95
All American Asphalt, Orange
$134,933.33
Blair Paving, Inc., Yorba Linda
$136,488.68
Five States Plumbing, Orange
$138,063.50
Lee Construction Corp., Mission Viejo
$140,774.79
Porter Construction Co., Santa Ana
$142,681.14
Griffith Co., Irvine
$146,919.95
Sully -Miller Contracting Cu., Orange
$153,891.30
Red Hill Construction Co., Inc., Santa Ana
$156,340.10
Hardy & Harper, Inc., Tustin
$162,405.48
Hannon B. J. Gladd Const. Co., Los Angeles
$183,709.10
The low bid is 24.8% below the engineer's
estimate of
$174,170.30, with $107,800 in gas tax funds budgeted for the
City's share of the project. Based on the low bid, the cost
split for the project is as follows:
City Share $ 54,395.93
County Share 76,569.02
Total $130,964.95
As recommended in the report dated March 9, 1982,
prepared by
the Engineering Division, it was moved by Edgar,
seconded by
Kennedy, to award the contract for subject project to the low
bidder, R. J. Noble Company, Orange, in the total amount of
$130,964.95. Motion carried 5-0.
95
2. PARKING PROHIBITION AT EL CAMINO REAL 6 SIXTH STREET
The Director of Public Works presented the staff report and
recommendation. Pursuant to h_s report dated March 10, 1982, it
was moved by Edaar, seconded by Saltarelli, to authorize the red
zor.-nes of curbs at the intersection of E1 Camino Real at Sixth
Street, result:no in a loss of 13 on -street parkins spaces,
pr -'or t:, the installation of tnE: forthcom-'no_ traffic s_gnai.
Carried 5-0. 75
3. UNIT FEE FOR M LTIPLE UNITS SERVICED BY ONE WATER METER
Tne Citv Manager presented the staff report and recommende__on
and stated that the effective date for the adjusted b:-montnl-,
water usage rates and charges would bQ ;.pr_! 1c', 1962. It was
then moved - Saltarelli, seconded by Hoesterev, to adopt the
follow --'ng r•.s-)iution-
RESOLUTION No. 82-25 - A Resolutio. of the ._tv Counc:_ of the
Cit", of Tust_n, Cal:fornic, ADJUST_=NC; TUSTIN WATEF1 SERVICE RATES
Motion carried 5-0. 107
4. DRAFT ORDINANCE FDR GAME ARCADES
Tne- Z:ommurif t% i>rveio xnen .: r-rctor presented the stzf f repor t
and recommendation. He stated stat` recommends approves: ,-if the
pror:s:ons outlined in Alternative I_ as conta_ned :n the renort
date. t•tarch 15, 1982, prepared by the Community Development
Department.
quest:on-and-answer period followed, rafter °urther
d:scuss:or., ;t was moved b•; Kennedy, seconded by Edgar, tc- refer
th•.: matt�. baci; co the Police Department for input.
Tne Community Development Director reported that the Use P•:rmit
mDrator:um for arcades exp,res in May.
The mot:on carred 5-0. 81
IX. OIMER
BUSINESS
1. CITY MANAGER
Tne City Manager stated he has distributed to Cour►cil a rejx3rt
on fund balances for the Redevelopment Agency and will answer
any Agency questions at the next regt.Iar meeting.
2. SIDEWALK CONDITION AT RED BILL L WALNUT
Councilman Saltarelli stated he has received citizen complaints
regardinq the dilaF-dated con :it:on of the asphalt sijewalk at
Red Y.ill and Walnu-. He reouested that staff look into the
92
matter.
3. SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL
Councilman Hoesterey reported teat the California League of
Cities, Orange County Division, unanimously appointed Ruby May
as a voting delegate to the Oranoe County Senior Citizens Advi-
sory Council as recommended by the City. Council. 28
4. MONITORING OF STATE FUNDING
Councilman Hoestr-rey provided a report of some current State
funding cutbacks. He suggested that staff monitor the State's
actions as the City goes into the budgetary process, that
unfunded State mandates be identified, and that list be provided
to the League of Cities so it can be combined with those of
other cities and lobbying commenced to get them removed. The
City Manager indicated staff woc:d provide such a 1-st at the
next regular meeting. 29
5. DIAL -A -RIDE
Councilwoman Kennedv
in:•u-'red i`_ there was a problem Mai;
the
Dial -A- Ride program,
ar _--ne has received,
citizen concerns
that
-he system has been
chanced, the-. are no
longer usinc two-wa`,
_adios, etc. Tne Directo- of ".-_-- works
stated he wool:
!o" -)V
into the matter ant
repo* bac
6. SEGERSTROM DEVELOPPIENT
Tne Mayor inquired about the ti- schedule for the Seger-trom
Development on N ewport. Staff resconoec that would be opt_-
mistic if it read: --s completion 145:-£�� .
T•.'.�J O:J ids !3E.'►1 T _
wz__S, moved b:• Edaar, seconded S to ad-iourn at
memory- of ualter Rawl_-naE t7� a�xt r�^'liar m� et_n _ or.
r:pr_ 1
19S2. Carried 5-11;-
64
K-71YOR